Scribd
Upload
35 views3 pages

Cost-Effective Concrete with Coconut Shells

The document investigates using crushed coconut and palm kernel shells as substitutes for conventional coarse aggregate in concrete. 320 concrete cubes were made with 0-100% shell replacement using two mix ratios. Tests found compressive strength decreased as shell percentage increased, with coconut shells exhibiting higher strength than palm kernels. Cost was reduced 30% for coconut shells and 42% for palm kernels. Considering strength and cost, coconut shells were deemed more suitable than palm kernels as coarse aggregate substitutes.

Uploaded by

BEN NARENDRAN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
35 views3 pages

Cost-Effective Concrete with Coconut Shells

The document investigates using crushed coconut and palm kernel shells as substitutes for conventional coarse aggregate in concrete. 320 concrete cubes were made with 0-100% shell replacement using two mix ratios. Tests found compressive strength decreased as shell percentage increased, with coconut shells exhibiting higher strength than palm kernels. Cost was reduced 30% for coconut shells and 42% for palm kernels. Considering strength and cost, coconut shells were deemed more suitable than palm kernels as coarse aggregate substitutes.

Uploaded by

BEN NARENDRAN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Abstract

The high cost of conventional building materials is a major factor affecting housing delivery in
Nigeria. This has necessitated research into alternative materials of construction. This paper
presents the results of an investigation carried out on the comparative cost analysis and strength
characteristics of concrete produced using crushed, granular coconut and palm kernel shells as
substitutes for conventional coarse aggregate in gradation of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%.
Two mix ratios ([Link] and [Link]) were used. A total of 320 cubes of size 100×100×100 mm were
cast, tested and their physical and mechanical properties determined. The results of the tests
showed that the compressive strength of the concrete decreased as the percentage of the shells
increased in the two mix ratios. However, concrete obtained from coconut shells exhibited a
higher compressive strength than palm kernel shell concrete in the two mix proportions. The
results also indicated cost reduction of 30% and 42% for concrete produced from coconut shells
and palm kernel shells, respectively. Considering the strength/economy ratio, it was concluded
that coconut shells were more suitable than palm kernel shells when used as substitute for
conventional aggregates in concrete production

next figure »

Fig. 1. Density vs. % replacement at [Link] and [Link] mix proportions.

Fig. 2. Compressive strength of CSC of mix proportion [Link].


Fig. 3. Compressive strength of CSC of mix proportion [Link].

Fig. 6. Comparison compressive strength of CSC and PKSC of mix proportion [Link] at 28
days curing

Fig. 8. Comparison of water absorption capacity of CSC and PKSC


Fig. 6. Comparison compressive strength of CSC and PKSC of mix proportion [Link] at 28
days curing

Fig. 7. Comparison compressive strength of CSC and PKSC of mix proportion [Link] at 28
days curing.

You might also like