Journal For Paint
Journal For Paint
ABSTRACT
This work investigated the pigment-extender effects of calcium carbonate and kaolin (china clay) in emulsion paint by determining
and comparing some important physical and performance properties of the emulsion paints produced with the two extenders. The
extenders were first sieved to obtain a uniform particle size range of 32-63 microns (µm) used in the formulation of the emulsion
paints. The compositional levels of the extenders in the emulsion paints were varied from 2-12% by weight. The results of the tests
showed that kaolin-filled emulsion paints had higher specific gravity values, higher pigment volume concentration (PVC) values and
higher viscosities than CaCO3-filled at all levels. However, the calcium carbonate-filled emulsion paints had more brilliant whiteness
than those produced with kaolin. The dry films of CaCO3-filled emulsion paints had a noticeable gloss (sheen) while those of kaolin
had a flat (non-glossy) appearance which was in conformity with their PVC values. The performance tests revealed the similarity of
the two paint variants in scrub resistance, but better performance of the kaolin variants in opacity, settling resistance and brushing
properties.
% PVC = x 100
The volume of pigment in the paint is determined from the coatings are as follows: flat paints, 50-70%; semi-gloss
expression: weight of pigment + extender / S.G of pigment+ paints, 35-45% and gloss paints, 25-35% (Sharma, 2002).
extender. The value for non-volatile constituents in the paint Generally, the paint gloss decreases as the PVC increases.
is obtained from the product of weight % of resin used in the This is due to the fact that when the volume of pigment
paint and its total solids content. The PVC values for various increases relative to the non-volatile vehicle, gloss decreases
IJST © 2015– IJST Publications UK. All rights reserved. 570
International Journal of Science and Technology (IJST) – Volume 4 No. 12, December, 2015
until the gloss of the paint becomes flat (Sharma, 2002). The The raw materials used to formulate the emulsion paints were
viscosity of paint, which is also controlled by the PVC, is an grades designed for paint production and were all obtained
important quality parameter as it affects the flow and from assured suppliers/ importers of paint raw-materials.
application properties of the paint and was also determined in They all met the required specifications when subjected to
this study. standard Quality Control tests.
Titanium dioxide White pigment 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00
Styrene-acrylic Binder 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 33.00
resin
Natrosol Cellulosic thickener 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Ammonia pH adjuster 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Texanol Coalescing agent 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
2.2.4 Procedure for Production of Emulsion Paints [Link]. Determination of Viscosity of Emulsion Paints at
±270C (NIS, 1990)
The production method described is the same for all levels of
extender but the quantities specified in the procedure are for The paint sample was poured into a sample can to a level of
the production of 300g of the emulsion paint which is about 2.5cm from the top of the can. The can was then placed
obtained by multiplying the % by weight of each component on the turntable of the rotothinner after it had been switched
by 3. on. The disc was immersed into the emulsion paint inside the
(i)The following components (weights in g) were loaded into sample can. The disc was allowed to rotate inside the paint
a plastic vessel: Water (part), (15.15) ,Calgon PT (0.45) sample until the peak viscosity value was obtained. The
Acticide Bx (1.50), Berol 09 (0.60), Antifoam (0.30) and viscosity reading was taken from the graduated scale around
Coatex (0.60) (ii) They were stirred at low speed by means the turntable. The disc was raised and the sample can
of a mini stirrer until Calgon PT dissolved. (approx 5 mins) removed, following which the disc was thoroughly cleaned
(iii) The following ingredients were added into the same pot with a brush and water.
with low-speed stirring: RHA (24.00) Titanium dioxide
(57.00) (iv) The mixture was then stirred at high speed [Link]. Determination of Dry Film Appearance of
(pigment dispersion stage) for about 20mins while Emulsion Paints
intermittently scraping the sides of the vessel. When the
dispersion was satisfactory, the stirring speed was reduced The paint was first thinned with water then applied by means
and the following components were added with slow stirring: of a brush on brush- out cards (6”x 4”). The first coat was
Styrene - acrylic resin (99.00), Water (26.00) (vi) Slurry of allowed to dry for 1hr after which the second coat was
the following was prepared in a separate container and added applied and allowed to dry. The dry paint films were
with stirring to the main pot: Water (70.35), natrosol (1.5). observed for degree of gloss/sheen.
(vii)The following components were finally added and the
mixture stirred until natrosol dissolved (approx 25mins): [Link]. Pigment Volume Concentration (PVC) Values of
Antifoam (part) (0.30), Ammonia (0.30), Texanol (3.00).(iii) Emulsion Paints
The paint was finally checked for satisfactory dispersion of
the pigment with the aid of a small piece of a 100-mesh sieve The PVC values of the emulsion paints were calculated from
and stored in sample cans. their specific gravity values using the mathematical
expression provided in Section 1
2.2.5. PHYSICAL TESTS .
2.2.6 Performance Tests
Physical tests were carried out on white emulsion paints
produced with kaolin (KWEP) and CaCO3 (CCWEP). The The white emulsion paints were subjected to opacity, scrub
tests were carried out using standard testing methods (NIS, resistance, settling resistance and brushing tests.
1990; NIS, 2008) with some modifications where necessary.
The tests include in-can assessment, pH, wt per litre (specific [Link]. Determination of Opacity of Emulsion Paints
gravity) and viscosity.
The paint sample was scooped with a palate knife and spread
[Link]. In-Can Appearance evenly across the width of a Morest chart (black and white
The emulsion paint samples were put in plastic sample cans, striped paper) about 4cm from the edge of the paper. The
gently and thoroughly stirred, then visually observed for paint was then evenly applied down the length of the paper by
colour, homogeneity/consistency and smoothness. means of the K-bar (stainless steel bar) and left to dry. A
second coat was applied using the same application technique
[Link]. pH Determination
but with a space of 5cm left from the edge of the first coat.
The opacity was assessed by the extent to which the black
The pH meter was switched on and the pH electrode was
and white stripes were covered by the paint.
standardized with a buffer solution of pH 7.0. The glass
electrode was rinsed with distilled water and dried with tissue
[Link]. Determination of Scrub resistance (Washability)
paper. It was then dipped into the emulsion paint and the pH
reading taken.
This test is used to determine the number of wet brushing
[Link]. Determination of weight per litre (specific gravity) cycles that the emulsion paint film can withstand before any
Values of Emulsion Paint scratch is observed on the film. Two coats of the emulsion
paint were applied to an asbestos panel of dimension 6”x 12”
The weight per litre cup was first weighed empty on a digital using a brush. The paint was allowed to dry under ambient
weighing scale. The value obtained was ‘tared’. The paint conditions and allowed to age for seven days. The test panels
sample was poured into the cup and any excess paint cleaned were mounted on the washability (scrub resistance) testing
off from the hole in the lid. The cup with the paint was machine fitted with nylon brushes. The machine was set at
weighed to obtain the wt per litre value of the paint. 5,000 cycles to determine if the paint would be washed off
the asbestos panel after brushing the surface 5,000 times.
[Link]. Determination of Settling Resistance calcium carbonate, calcite, dolomite and kaolin respectively(
Morgans, 1990) Fig. 1 shows a chart of the S.G values of
The emulsion paint samples were thoroughly stirred then kaolin and CaCO3 at various particle size ranges. The
poured into 500ml plastic jars which were tightly covered. disparity in S.G between CaCO3 and kaolin at the different
The samples were left to stand for a period of four weeks at particle size ranges is evident.
the end of which they were stirred to check the presence of
hard settlement.
produced emulsion paints with pH values slightly higher than Table 3: pH Value of CCWEPs and KWEPs at 2-
specification of 7.00-9.00 for emulsion paints (NIS,2008 ) 12% Levels of Extender
pH Values of CCWEP and KWEP at 2-12%
Extender Level
2 4 6 8 10 12
This trend is probably due to the fact that pH values of Table 4: Weight per litre (Specific Gravity) Values of
emulsion paints are affected by several factors such as the pH Emulsion Paints
of the resin, additives and other components of the paint as
well as amount of ammonia used. Thus, the slight variation in Weight per Litre Values of CCWEP and KWEP at
pH values of CCWEPs and KWEPs is attributable to a 2-12% Level
combination of the said factors.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
3.5. Weight per Litre (Specific Gravity) Values of
Emulsion Paints CCWEP 0.98 0.99 1.03 0.93 1.03 1.04
The weight per litre values (equivalent to specific gravity) of KWEP 1.04 1.08 1.10 1.15 0.99 1.01
CCWEP and KWEP are presented in Table 4. KWEP had the
highest values in the range of 1.01-1.15 while CCWEP values Control 1.17
were in the range of 0.98-1.04. It is evident that the S.G of the
extenders had little or no effect on the S.G of the emulsion
paints otherwise CCWEPs would have had higher S.G values
than KWEPs since CaCO3 has a higher S.G than kaolin.
Fig .3. Plots of Weight per litre values of Emulsion paint versus Extender level
The little or no impact of the S.G of extender on emulsion Table 5. Viscosity Values (poises) of CCWEPs
paints S.G can be attributed to the presence of other and KWEPs at different Extender Levels
components in the emulsion paint as well as other factors.
Such factors that can affect the S.G of the emulsion paint Viscosity(poises) of CCWEP and KWEP at 2-
include specific gravity of pigment, level of pigment 12%
dispersion, presence and amount of air bubbles and amount of
foam generated during blending of the paint. Thus the S.G of 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
the emulsion paint varies but the variation usually falls within
the range of ±0.2. The S.G of the Control (1.17) which had no CCWEP 2.6 3.2 3.5 3.6 4.0 5.0
extender also substantiates this observation as it is higher than
the values of the emulsion paints containing extender. The KWEP 2.8 3.4 4.1 4.4 5.0 5.9
high S.G of the Control can be attributed to the high S.G of Control 2.8
4.6 of titanium dioxide ([Link]) used as
pigment in the paint. The addition of an extender of lower The emulsion paints showed a gradual increase in viscosity at
S.G evidently reduced the impact of the high S.G of TiO2. lower extender levels (2-6%) but sharp increases at higher
The two extenders, however, did not show much variation in levels (8-12%), which implies that higher levels of extenders
S.G with increasing extender levels. are required in the paint formulation for a pronounced
increase in the viscosity of the emulsion paints.
3.6. Effect of Calcium Carbonate and Kaolin on Viscosity
of Emulsion Paints
The superiority of kaolin to CaCO3 in thickening performance The calculated PVC values of CCWEP and KWEP obtained
can be attributed to its having a lower S.G than CaCO3 of the at 2-12% extender levels are presented in Table 6. Plots of
same particle size range. The low S.G of kaolin results in a calculated PVC values versus extender levels for CCWEP
higher pigment volume concentration (PVC) of KWEPs due and KWEP are shown in Fig.5
to the inverse relationship between S.G and PVC of paint. .
This increase in the volume of pigment/extender particles in Table 6. Pigment Volume Concentration (PVC)
the paint, implies that more kaolin particles are dispersed in values of Extenders
the paint which invariably results in a proportionate increase
PVC Values of CCWEP and KWEP at 2-12% Levels
in its resistance to flow, which is described as ‘viscosity’ of
the paint. The Control which had 0% extender had a value of
2 4 6 8 10 12
2.8 poises which is the same as that for 2% KWEP, and
slightly higher than that of 2% CCWEP. This suggests that CCWEP 25.49 28.39 31.05 33.52 35.77 37.99
low levels of CaCO3 and kaolin have little effect on paint
viscosity. KWEP 26.30 29.84 33.09 36.05 38.73 41.22
specific gravity and PVC; the lower the S.G of the extender,
the greater its volume and the higher the PVC value of the 3.12. Brushing Properties
paint. Thus, kaolin with a lower S.G produced emulsion
paints with higher PVC values than CaCO3. The PVC values KWEPs displayed better brushing properties than those of
of KWEP correspond to those of exterior house paints which CCWEP, in terms of ease of application, flow and spread of
have a low-gloss or flat appearance while the PVC values of the paint on the substrate when applied with both brush and
CCWEP fall within the category of semi-gloss paints [6,7]. roller. This is probably due to the difference in their particle
shapes. The lamellar (plate-like) shape of kaolin particles
3.8. Dry Film Appearance of Emulsion Paints promotes ease of application better than the nodular (round)
shape of the CaCO3 particles.
The PVC values of the emulsion paints reflected in the
appearance of the dry paint films when applied on a substrate.
CCWEP had a noticeable gloss (sheen) while KWEP had a 4. CONCLUSION
rather flat appearance. This effect has substantiated the ‘semi-
gloss’ category of SFWEP and the ‘exterior house paint’ The results of the study revealed that KWEPs had higher
category of RHAWEPs based on PVC values. viscosities than CCWEPs at all extender levels. The pigment
volume concentration (PVC) values of KWEP were higher
3.9. Opacity of Emulsion Paints than those of CCWEP at all extender levels due to the lower
specific gravity of kaolin. The PVC values were evident in
The opacity of the paint, which is also known as the hiding or the dry film appearance of the emulsion paints such that the
obliterating power, is largely dependent on the nature and dry films of CCWEPs had a noticeable gloss (sheen) while
amount of pigment in the paint. However, KWEPs were those of KWEP were rather flat (non-glossy). Kaolin-filled
observed to be slightly better than CCWEP in opacity at 8- emulsion paints showed better performance in opacity,
10% level. Although, they both covered the Morest chart in settling resistance and brushing properties than CaCO3-filled.
two coats, KWEP was found to obliterate the black and white The findings suggest that for a glossy appearance as well as
stripes on the chart slightly better than CCWEPs. This brilliant white colours, calcium carbonate is preferable to
suggests that kaolin contributes to opacity which conforms kaolin. However, if a glossy finish is not required, kaolin
with literature finding (Morgans, 1990). Since extenders have might be a better choice because of the additional benefits in
little or no effect on opacity, the hiding power of the white viscosity, opacity and brushing properties. Further research
emulsion paints is due mostly to the presence of titanium work will explore effects of combinations of kaolin and
dioxide pigment,which has excellent hiding power. CaCO3 in different ratios on emulsion paint properties.
Morgans, W.M., Outlines of Paint Technology, 3 rd ed. Sharma, B.K.( 2011). Industrial Chemistry, KRISHNA
Edward Arnold, London, pp 1-8, 425- 438, 1990. Prakashan Media (P) Ltd., 16th ed., Chapter 43, pp.1353-
1355,Sharma, B.K(.2002). Engineering Chemistry,
Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS) (1990). Test Methods for KRISHNA Prakashan Media(P) Ltd.5th ed., p.494
Paints and Varnishes, NIS 278:1990,Standards Organization
of Nigeria (SON), Lagos, Nigeria, part 6, pp. 1-28.
Terry Hickling,( 2008). Specific gravity of Powders
Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS),( 2008). Specifications for Determination, Martex Paint Ltd., Birmingham, UK,.
Emulsion Paints for Decorative Purposes, NIS:269:2008 [Link]/481/[Link]
Standards Organization of Nigeria (SON), Lagos, Nigeria, pp.
5-13, [Link]/[Link]/msds/294-titanium-oxid-tiO2;
Retrieved on 15th Oct.2015