Phase in TQM Implementation
Phase in TQM Implementation
Jablonski's five-phase Total Quality Management (TQM) implementation strategy includes preparation, planning, assessment, implementation, and diversification. In the preparation phase, management decides on pursuing TQM, communicates goals, develops corporate policies, and commits resources . The planning phase involves drafting a detailed implementation plan, setting quantifiable targets, and secure necessary resources . During the assessment phase, a thorough evaluation of the company and its practices is conducted through methods like discussion groups and surveys . Implementation involves training support personnel and managers to begin determining returns on TQM investments . Finally, diversification involves using TQM experiences to engage external groups like suppliers in the quality process .
The '5 Whys' technique contributes to problem-solving in TQM planning by encouraging repeated inquiry to delve deeper into the underlying issues of a problem. By asking 'Why?' at least five times, organizations can peel back layers of symptoms that obscure the true cause, often uncovering factors that may not be immediately apparent. This method allows TQM planners to focus on fixing root causes rather than just addressing symptoms, enhancing problem resolution effectiveness and ensuring lasting solutions .
Management commitment is crucial in TQM implementation because it ensures allocation of necessary resources and sets a precedent for organizational culture change. Lack of commitment often leads to a failure in changing the organizational culture, which is essential for TQM success since it requires trust and a shift from fear-based approaches . Moreover, without strong management backing, other barriers such as improper planning, lack of continuous training, and ineffective measurement occur, undermining TQM efforts . Management must actively engage to provide direction, align the organization’s values with the TQM goals, and facilitate an environment where improvement and quality are prioritized.
The Cause and Effect Diagram, or fishbone diagram, aids in quality management by providing a visual representation of potential causes of a problem, helping in the thorough investigation of the possible origins of quality issues. It organizes and categorizes potential causes into groups such as methods, manpower, materials, and machinery, among others, allowing teams to evaluate all areas of influence and determine root causes comprehensively . This broad and systematic approach facilitates the identification of key factors contributing to defects or issues, aiding in targeted problem-solving efforts and overall process improvements.
In a TQM framework, a Control Chart plays the critical role of monitoring and controlling process performance over time by distinguishing between common cause and special cause variations. It helps ensure that a process remains within acceptable limits by graphically displaying data, such as sales or customer complaints, in chronological order, which allows for the identification of trends, shifts, and outliers . By providing a basis for process stability assessment, control charts enable organizations to maintain processes 'in control' and foster continuous improvement in performance by addressing deviations as they occur.
A lack of continuous training and education can significantly hinder TQM efforts by resulting in knowledge gaps among employees, reducing awareness of TQM practices, and stunting competency development. Without ongoing training, employees might not fully understand TQM principles, leading to inconsistent application and diminished performance outcomes. Furthermore, it can cause resistance to process changes needed for TQM, limit employee empowerment, and decrease motivation to achieve quality goals . Continuous education helps in keeping the workforce updated with the latest TQM practices and technologies, ensuring alignment with organizational objectives.
A Pareto Chart is used in TQM to prioritize problems by visually illustrating their relative significance based on the Pareto Principle, which asserts that approximately 80% of effects come from 20% of causes. The chart organizes and displays data, typically focusing on the frequency of defects or issues, to highlight the most critical ones that require attention. By concentrating efforts on the few causes that have the most significant impact, organizations can effectively allocate resources toward resolving the most pressing problems, hence improving overall process quality and efficiency .
An organization's structure can become a barrier to TQM implementation if it promotes siloed departments and isolated individuals, which hampers communication and the flow of information needed for comprehensive quality management. Structural barriers often lead to conflicting objectives across departments, reducing the organization's ability to collaboratively engage in TQM initiatives and create a unified improvement strategy . This fragmentation can result in misaligned goals, competition for resources, and resistance to change, which undermines efforts to cultivate a culture of quality and continuous improvement required for successful TQM.
The absence of empowerment and teamwork in TQM negatively affects the process by stifling the creativity and initiative of employees, essential for innovative problem-solving and continuous improvement. Without empowerment, teams lack the authority and confidence to make decisions and implement changes, limiting adaptive and proactive approaches to quality issues . Additionally, insufficient teamwork leads to a lack of collaboration and information sharing across departments, which is essential for creating cohesive and integrated strategies for quality improvements. Such deficiencies weaken the organization’s ability to respond effectively to customer needs and market changes, ultimately undermining TQM objectives of achieving superior quality and performance.
Benchmarking enhances an organization’s quality improvement plans by providing a structured method for comparison and learning from the best practices of others. It involves analyzing the performance (performance benchmarking) and operations (practice benchmarking) of top-performing organizations to identify gaps and areas for improvement . By implementing best practices identified through internal, external, competitive, or non-competitive benchmarking, companies can set realistic goals, improve efficiency, and achieve superior quality standards. This further leads to enhanced customer satisfaction by refining processes and products based on proven success metrics from other industry leaders .