Guide To Water Work Design
Guide To Water Work Design
October 2012
EPB 201
Note: As of October 1, 2012 The Water Security Agency and Saskatchewan Ministry of
Environment share responsibility and authority for the administration of The Environmental
Management and Protection Act, 2002, and The Water Regulations, 2002 as pertaining to
prescribed waterworks or sewage works in Saskatchewan. Therefore, all material contained within
this document applies to waterworks or sewage works governed by the Water Security Agency or
the Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment in accordance with their assigned responsibility .
Foreword
This document replaces A Guide to Waterworks Design published by Saskatchewan
Environment; October 2008.
The design guide applies to all waterworks controlled by The Water Regulations, 2002 and
should be used as a companion to the applicable Acts, regulations and other provincial
publications currently in use or as may be published from time to time. These include:
For private and municipal designers and waterworks owners, the guidelines:
identify items and factors that should be considered for waterworks; and
provide accepted practices suitable for Saskatchewan conditions.
The design guide is not intended to be a detailed engineering manual. However, the guide
addresses the aspects pertinent to the design of water treatment units so as to safeguard the
public and protect the environment.
i
[Link] Granular Bed Filtration
[Link] Pressure Filtration
[Link] Direct Filtration
[Link] Slow Sand Filtration9
[Link] Special Filters
3.2.7 Taste and Odour Control
3.2.8 Activated Carbon Adsorption
3.2.9 Membrane Processes
3.2.10 Fluoridation
3.2.11 Disinfection
3.2.12 Instrumentations/Controls
3.3 Groundwater 21
3.3.1 Processes
3.3.2 Pre-Filtration Processes
3.3.3 Filtration
3.3.4 Manganese Greensand Filtration
3.3.5 Other Common Groundwater Treatment Processes
4. Treated Water Storage ............................................................................................................22
4.1 General ..............................................................................................................22
4.1.1 Type of Storage
4.1.2 Location
4.1.3 Protection
4.1.4 Freezing
4.1.5 Safety
4.2 Capacities ..............................................................................................................23
4.2.1 Sizing
4.2.2 Fire Protection
4.2.3 Recommended Minimum Storage
4.3 Design Features .............................................................................................................23
4.3.1 General
4.3.2 Materials
4.3.3 Protection Coatings and/or Cathodic Protection
4.3.4 Drains
4.3.5 Drainage of Roof
4.3.6 Entrances
4.3.7 Vents
4.3.8 Cleaning/Disinfection
4.4 Hydropneumatic (Pressure) Tanks ..............................................................................24
4.4.1 Pressure Tank Storage
4.4.2 Location
5. Distribution ......................................................................................................................25
5.1 General ......................................................................................................................25
5.2 Pumping Facilities .........................................................................................................25
5.2.1 General
5.2.2 Pumps
5.3 Distribution Systems .....................................................................................................26
5.3.1 Materials
5.3.2 Placement
5.3.3 Sizes, Pressures
5.3.4 Fire Hydrants (Municipal Waterworks)
5.3.4 Valves, Appurtenances
5.3.5 Construction and Maintenance Practices
Appendix A ......................................................................................................................26
References ......................................................................................................................34
Glossary of Symbols and Abbreviation .....................................................................................34
ii
1. Information Submissions for Approvals
1.1 General
An approval to construct, extend, or alter any waterworks must be obtained from the Water Security Agency
before starting construction of such works. Applications for approval are required to be made on prescribed
forms obtained from the Water Security Agency.
Applications for approvals are required to contain information as outlined below. Information should be in a
concise form and logical order. Drawings and plans should conform to good engineering practices.
Previously submitted information need not be resubmitted unless it is affected by the construction, extension
or alteration or updating is appropriate.
The following summarizes the regulatory requirements and includes other recommended submissions that
will facilitate the review and processing of applications.
When a person makes an application for a permit to construct, extend or alter waterworks as required in
Section 22 of the Act, he/she shall include in the application:
engineering reports for new systems and major modifications;
name(s) of owners and responsible party for operation and maintenance;
designer or responsible engineer or engineering firm;
proposed period of construction and anticipated operation date;
cost estimates for the work including applicable local improvement or capital portions; and
if applicable, application for permit shall include easement agreement containing the following
information and provisions:
a) the name of the person proposing to construct, extend, alter or operate the waterworks that is the
subject of the easement;
b) the nature and extent of the construction, extension, alteration or operation of the waterworks that is
the subject of the easement;
c) the name of the registered owner of the land on which the waterworks that is the subject of the
easement is to be constructed, extended, altered or operated and, if different, the name of the
registered owner of the land affected by the waterworks that is the subject of the easement;
d) the legal description of the lands mentioned in clause (c); and
e) a provision that:
i. grants an easement by the registered owners of the lands affected by the waterworks that is
the subject of the easement;
ii. conveys a right to use the land for the purposes and to the extent required to construct, alter,
extend or operate the waterworks that is the subject of the easement; and
iii. states that the easement runs with the land and is binding on the present and subsequent
registered owners of the lands affected by waterworks that is the subject of the easement
and their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns.
Municipalities and other waterworks owners are advised that First Nations and Métis Consultation must take
place before any waterworks or distribution system construction, upgrading or decommissioning activities
that could adversely affect treaty or aboriginal rights is developed or put in place. Although the need for
notification or consultation will depend on the specific circumstances of construction, upgrading or
decommissioning, such consultation is to begin at the earliest possible time (conceptual stage) and to some
degree could involve the municipalities or other waterworks owners and their consultants. For more
information please see Government of Saskatchewan Guidelines for Consultation with First Nations and
Métis Consultation at: [Link] Municipalities and
other waterworks owners are also advised that such construction, upgrading or decommissioning activities
with a significant areal impact will need to have an initial review called a Heritage Resource Review or HRR
which will determine if a broader Heritage Resource Impact Assessment or HRIA is necessary.
3
plan and profile of the water supply main indicating the size, material, location, depth and
appurtenances;
for groundwater supplies, the depth, diameter, screen details and the rated capacity of the well together
with the type and capacity of the pumps; and
for surface water supplies, details of impoundments, intake works, the type and capacity of pumps,
hydrological projections, intake operating mode and planned or contemplated source treatment.
1.5 Distribution
plan of the distribution system showing the location of the pipe in the street in relation to other
underground utilities, the depth of pipe burial, profile elevations, the type and size of pipe, and
location of hydrants, valves and appurtenances;
description of the water main location using street referencing where possible; and
design information for the distribution or water transmission system including flow capacity, areas
served and future areas to be served.
2. Water Supply
2.1 General
2.1.1 Approvals
During the investigation for water supplies, the requirements of other administrative authorities with respect
to water rights, groundwater exploration, environmental impact assessments, planning, and intake siting,
etc., should be reviewed and applicable consultation undertaken. Required approvals from other authorities
should be obtained as soon as possible.
2.1.2 Characteristics
The water supply should be of such quality so that the municipal drinking water quality objectives can be
achieved with appropriate treatment technology. Quality considerations should include potential future
changes and other variables that may impact on treatment capability or water safety. The capacity of the
supply should be checked to provide confidence in the long-term expectations for the source.
4
storage capacities with respect to demands;
anticipated maintenance and repair schedules; and
alternate supply options.
Direct in-stream supplies should have sufficient flow to meet forecast peak demands at all times and
consideration should be given to operational practices of current and foreseeable upstream water
development projects.
Where a watercourse has highly variable flows and/or water quality, consideration should be given to the
provision of off-stream storage to ensure use of adequate water supplies of the best available quality. The
capacity of off-stream storage should be based on the hydrological and quality characteristics of the primary
supply.
In general, supplies created by new impoundments or water development projects should be assessed prior
to the design of waterworks facilities. Where this is not feasible, projections based on upstream data or from
similar impoundments within the drainage basin could be made.
5
2.2.5 Intakes
In addition to economic and construction factors, intake-siting considerations should include:
water quality;
water circulation patterns;
bank stability and localized erosion potential;
bottom sediment buildups and silting potential;
accessibility;
protection from other users; and
location of outfalls.
Intakes should be accurately marked or mapped to enable their location during any season. In water
supplies susceptible to vertical water quality variations, inlets should be placed to allow withdrawal of the
best water quality. In general, inlets should be placed no lower than 0.75 m (2.5 ft.) off the bottom and the
top inlet should be at least 2 m (6.5 ft.) below the low surface level where depths permit.
Intakes should be suitably anchored and marked if they may interfere with other users. Intakes should be
designed to prevent entry of fish and debris and entrance velocities should be kept to a minimum especially
where frazil ice may be a problem. On large intakes, mechanical screening is recommended. For small
gravity intakes, a means of back flushing should be provided.
Where use of submerged infiltration-type intakes are proposed for small capacity facilities, consideration
should be given to the potential water quality impact of the media and the capability for periodic cleaning
and/or replacement of the media face.
2.3 Groundwater
2.3.1 Hydrogeological Characteristics
The long-term safe yield and recommended pumping rate of a well supply should be established. The
following information should be obtained:
pump test and recovery data and curves;
depth and extent of the aquifer;
geological profile of the aquifer overburden;
probable source of aquifer recharge; and
location and characteristics of observation wells.
Where artificial recharge is proposed, the source water should be free of contaminants. A sample of the
proposed source water should be analyzed and the results discussed with the Water Security Agency.
Drilled wells should be of watertight construction to exclude contamination from the surface and designed to
seal off formations that are, or may be, contaminated or yield undesirable water.
Provision should be made for proper disinfection of the well during drilling, construction, and repair
operations as follows:
during drilling operations: by the application of chlorine to the water in the well each day in sufficient
quantity to obtain a chlorine concentration of 50 mg/L in all the water in the well; and by cleaning and
disinfecting the gravel pack materials and pumping equipment before placement;
after completion of well construction and before use: by thoroughly removing foreign substances
including swabbing the casing pipe using alkalis if necessary to remove oil, grease or other material;
application of sufficient chlorine to the well to ensure a chlorine residual in the well water of at least
50 mg/L for at least 12 but not more than 24 hours. Disinfection of wells should follow appropriate
standards such as AWWA C654; and
after a repaired pump has been reinstalled or a new pump has been installed: by chlorine application
as noted above.
6
Observation wells when not being used must be properly sealed to prevent the entry of surface water, dirt or
other material into the well.
Following development of a well, the water quality should be determined to include the appropriate variables
or constituents listed in Saskatchewan Municipal Drinking Water Quality Standards and Objectives. In
addition, the potential for undesirable dissolved gases and bacteriological growths should be assessed.
Sufficient analyses should be obtained to account for potential groundwater quality and sampling variability.
2.4.2 Pumping
Pumping capacity should be consistent with the supply and aquifer capacity and the water treatment
capability. In general, for single supply sources, the pumping rate should equal the maximum daily demand
based on the plant's operating time.
The number of pumps should be consistent with the pattern of flow requirements and the method of flow
control. At least two pumps are recommended for single surface supply sources. Pumping capacity should
be met with the largest unit out of service. Pumps should be chosen to operate over a full range of flows and
adequate control valving installed.
Where only one pump is used to service small waterworks, consideration should be given for emergency or
standby units.
7
2.5 Supply Pipelines
2.5.1 Capacity
Pipeline capacity should be based on maximum day demands with consideration given to supply and
treatment capacities and potential demands within the life of the pipeline.
2.5.2 Materials
Supply lines should be of durable material and pipe, fittings and appurtenances should conform to applicable
standards or specifications issued by AWWA, CSA, CGSB or other acceptable references. Pipe selection
should be based on careful consideration of pressure regimes including transient pressures such as surge
and external loading. In addition, the material should be assessed with respect to both external and internal
corrosion potential. Where necessary, corrosion protection measures should be incorporated.
Interior lining should conform to AWWA standards is available. Consideration should be given to potential
water quality effects from the lining.
2.5.3 Location
Where possible, supply pipelines should be located in stable areas and where the line is readily accessible
for repair. Care should be taken to avoid installation near areas of potential contamination. Sufficient bury
should be provided to prevent freezing with special attention given to road crossings. Consideration should
be given to grading the line to facilitate draining and the installation of drainage facilities.
2.5.4 Appurtenances
Air release valves should be provided at high points along the line where needs dictate. The use of reliable
automatic valves should be considered on long lines. Air release valves should be protected from damage
and accessible for testing or repair.
Isolation valves should be considered for long pipelines and should be placed at the terminal ends of
underwater crossings to facilitate testing or repairs. Valve locations should be well marked and readily
accessible. Valve selection should include considerations for minimizing water hammer and the use of
pipeline cleaning materials such as pigs or swabs.
Pipeline design should consider flushing, cleaning, and disinfection needs during construction and
subsequent use. For pipelines susceptible to chemical or biological deposits, provisions for pig or swab
launching and exit facilities should be made.
Where supply connections are made for other users in addition to the engineering and operational problems,
consideration should be given to the execution of agreements covering water quality aspects and for the
prevention of cross-connection.
Backflow prevention devices should be installed to prevent backflow occurring at the point of a cross-
connection. It is important that the backflow prevention device match the particular hydraulic conditions at
that location and is suitable to protect against the degree of hazard present. Generally, cross-connection
and backflow prevention utilize five control measures including:
air gap (AG);
reduced pressure zone backflow preventer (RPZ);
double check valves (DCs);
pressure vacuum breaker (PVB); and
atmospheric vacuum breaker (AVB).
3. Treatment
3.1 General
3.1.1 Objectives
The objectives of a public water supply water system are to provide safe and aesthetically appealing water to
the customers without interruption and at a reasonable cost, an adequate quantity of water at sufficient
pressure for fire protection and industrial water for manufacturing.
8
3.1.2 Selection of Water Treatment Processes
Selection of a suitable water treatment process for a given utility is always a complex and diverse task.
Conditions are likely to be different for each water utility, adoption of an appropriate water treatment process
by a water utility is influenced by the necessity to meet the regulatory guidelines, the desire of the utility and
its customers to meet other water quality standards and objectives and the need to provide water service at
the lowest reasonable cost. A water treatment plant should be designed considering the fact that it should
supply continuous and safe water to the customers regardless of the raw water characteristics and the
environmental conditions. Hence, the selection of treatment process is important in the plant design. The
ultimate plant design has a system that is proven to be simple, effective, reliable, durable and cost-effective.
The design of water treatment plant starts with the preliminary studies that include:
design period;
water supply areas – identifying the areas to be served;
population – estimating the present and future population;
estimating maximum daily water demand;
evaluation and selection of the water source;
size of the treatment plant;
location of the treatment plant site; and
financing.
Engineers/designers should conduct a preliminary engineering study and consider the following basic rules
prior to design work:
standards and objectives of the finished water quality;
source treatment and potential water quality changes during supply transmission;
treatability of raw water – various treatment options to be considered;
recommend a treatment process that is cost-effective;
keep an alternate treatment process;
design a plant that is easy to construct and safe to operate; and
confirm that the plant meets the structural and geotechnical design specifications, hydraulic grade
across the plant and legal requirements.
For waterworks serving the public, the treated water quality shall meet the current Saskatchewan Municipal
Drinking Water Quality Standards and should also meet the objectives. Where a treatment facility serves
more than one supply source, careful consideration should be given to ensure the treatment processes are
applicable and compatible for the sources.
The selection of package treatment plants and special proprietary devices or processes should be based on
proper consideration of:
raw water condition and demand variability;
operation and maintenance;
servicing, repairs or replacement; and
operational flexibility.
3.1.3 Capacities
The water treatment plant production capacity should be on the basis of the maximum day demand at the
design year with consideration also given for capacity to address storage or fire flow needs.
Treatment process capacity should be based on the plant production capacity, the in-plant water use and
allowances for treatment component downtime such as filter washing. Consideration should also be given to
capacity restrictions during periods of worst water quality. Where feasible, recycling of non-sanitary
wastewater should be considered.
Treatment capacities should consider future expansion needs and allowances should be made for logical
staging of process units.
9
3.1.4 Plant Siting
The site evaluation is based primarily on the distance from the site, the layout of treatment units and the
method of water distribution (gravity or pumping). Further, the following items must be considered in
evaluation of the treatment plant site:
neighbouring land use compatibility;
availability of electric power and utilities;
accessibility for vehicles including supplies and equipment transport;
susceptibility to flooding;
foundation stability;
provision for future plant expansion; and
plant wastewater disposal facilities.
Interior finishes should be durable and easily cleaned. Floors should be finished to provide a smooth, dust
free surface and should be graded to provide adequate drainage. Consideration should be given to ensure
products or materials of construction will not affect water quality for both raw and treated water.
Fuel storage should be sited and protective measures incorporated to avoid any potential contamination of
raw or treated water.
Water service should be provided from a source that has had full treatment including adequate disinfection
contact time. Consideration should be given to the provision of a hot water supply for sanitary and cleaning
purposes. The water system should be properly protected from any cross-connections.
Electrical systems should be adequate to accommodate peak usage plus reserves for maintenance and
repair equipment and potential upgrading. Main switch gear should be located above grade and not subject
to flooding. Adequate electrical outlets should be provided for maintenance and other services.
Adequate heating should be provided with control levels depending on the type of area being heated.
Consideration should be given to the provision of adequate building ventilation especially for below grade
facilities and for dehumidifying needs.
3.1.7 Safety
Particular attention should be paid to ensuring the plant complies with the current occupational health and
safety regulations. All necessary safety and protective equipment should be available at the time of plant
start-up. Attention should be given to recommended safety measures as provided by suppliers of equipment
and chemicals.
Piping should be arranged so that all valves, meters or other appurtenances are conveniently accessible.
Proper consideration should be given to installation of drains, air release valves and cleanouts and flushing
facilities where applicable. A totalizing water meter should be provided and additional flow measuring
10
devices should be installed as applicable to the treatment units. Piping should be designed with flow
velocities based on process, hydraulic and retention time considerations.
It is recommended that piping be adequately identified as to contents and direction of flow. Where a facility
does not have a standardized colouring or marking code, one should be adopted. The recommended colour
code for the Water Treatment Plant Piping as per the “Ten State Standards” is shown in Table 3.1.
Suitable operations and maintenance manuals should be prepared and readily available to operating
personnel at all times. It is suggested that manual include:
drawings, installation descriptions, recommended lubrication and maintenance schedules, special
operation and/or maintenance features, calibration requirements, spare parts listing, warrantees and
parts and repair availability for all equipment;
basic operating procedures.
recommended testing and record keeping program;
description of finishes; and
any emergency procedures and troubleshooting instructions that may be applicable.
11
Analytical equipment and laboratory facilities should be provided with consideration given to:
source water quality and its variability;
treatment processes - their complexity, adjustment opportunity and performance assessment;
operating personnel capability;
optional analytical availability; and
acquisition of reagents and equipment parts.
Appropriate forms should be devised for maintenance of water treatment records for water usage, process
operations and analytical test data.
3.1.12 Wastewater
All sanitary wastes should be segregated within the plant from process wastewaters and discharged to a
sanitary sewage works or provided acceptable on-site or off-site treatment. Consideration should be given to
recycling of process wastewaters where feasible.
Clarifier sludges should receive a minimum of sedimentation. The disposal of concentrated sludge should be
considered.
Filtration of a surface water source or a groundwater source under the direct influence of surface water may
not be necessary if all of the following conditions are met:
Disinfection must reliably achieve at least a 99% (2-log) reduction of Cryptosporidium oocysts,* a 99.9% (3-
log) reduction of Giardia lamblia cysts and a 99.99% (4-log) reduction of viruses. If mean source water
12
cyst/oocyst levels are greater than 10/1000 L, more than 99% (2-log) reduction of Cryptosporidium oocysts
and 99.9% (3-log) reduction of Giardia lamblia cysts must be achieved. Background levels for Giardia
lamblia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in the source water should be established by monitoring as
described in the most recent “Protozoa” guideline document produced by the Federal/Provincial/Territorial
Committed on Drinking Water, or more frequently during periods of expected highest levels (e.g., during
spring runoff or after heavy rainfall).
2. Prior to the point where the disinfectant is applied, the number of Escherichia coli bacteria in the source
water does not exceed 20/100 mL (or, if E. coli data are not available, the number of total coliform bacteria
does not exceed 100/100 mL) in at least 90% of the weekly samples from the previous 6 months.
3. Average daily source water turbidity levels measured at equal intervals (at least every 4 hours),
immediately prior to where the disinfectant is applied, are around 1.0 NTU but do not exceed 5.0 NTU for
more than 2 days in a 12-month period. Source water turbidity also does not show evidence of protecting
microbiological contaminants.
4. A watershed control program (e.g., protected watershed, controlled discharges, etc.) is maintained that
minimizes the potential for faecal contamination in the source water. The Water Security Agency must be
informed and consulted on any watershed control program.
In the selection of a water treatment process, consideration should also be given to provide appropriate
control measures to control the disinfection by-products (DPBs) that are formed during the disinfection
process. However, this should not be done in manners that would compromise the efficiency of the
disinfection process. Special treatment processes for controlling the specific contaminants would have to be
reviewed on an individual basis.
Use of coagulant or flocculant aids should be based on appropriate bench or pilot testing for the specific
water supply. Polyelectrolytes or other aids should be suitable and approved for use with water. Special
consideration should be given to mixing needs, chemical agency application points, and dosage control.
Chemicals should be stored and handled in appropriate manners. Containers should be fully labeled to
include chemical name, purity and concentration and supplier name and address. Segregated, interior
storage space should be provided if possible with consideration given to:
maintenance of inventory for at least 30 days supply unless short notice deliveries are assured;
unloading and handling conveniences;
maintenance of dry conditions;
compatibility of chemicals or species hazards;
protection from adulteration and spills; and
13
suitable ventilation.
For critical operations like disinfection and coagulation, standby feeders should be available. Chemical feed
equipment should have appropriate dust and gas control measures and siting considerations should include
proximity to application points and accessibility for servicing, repair and observations. Measures should be
taken to avoid potential cross-connection problems with water and potential chemical syphoning. In addition
to ensuring feeders are suitable for the form and characteristics of the chemical, selection considerations
should include:
adequate capacities to meet anticipated maximum dosages;
ability to control feed rates; and
reliability of operation, availability of parts and repairs and repair capability.
Chemical application points should be carefully evaluated for such factors as:
treatment efficiency;
safety to operators;
flexibility for process modifications;
mixing;
antagonistic effects of different chemicals;
impact on facility materials; and
feed line maintenance.
3.2.3 Aeration
Aeration is effective for removing dissolved gases and highly odorous compounds such as hydrogen sulfide.
Aeration is the first step in treating impounded surface waters or well water, and may achieve any of the
following: removal of hydrogen sulfide; reduction of dissolved carbon dioxide; and addition of dissolved
oxygen for oxidation of iron and manganese. Examples of aeration processes include diffused mechanical
nozzle spraying, multiple tray cascading and packed power type.
Forced or induced draft aeration devices should be designed to ensure even water distribution, adequate
counter currents of air and proper external exhausting. As a guide, the loading should be within the range of
0.7 to 3.4 L/s per m² of total tray area (0.8 to 4 gpm/ft²) and 5 or more trays used with separations not less
than 150 mm (6 inches). Where pressure aeration is proposed for oxidation purposes, consideration should
be given to compressed air quality and mixing, the scaling potential of the water and subsequent air release.
Aerators should have a bypass and provisions should be made for inspection and cleaning of the devices.
Exhaust gases should be vented outside the building.
Flocculation is the gentle mixing phase that follows the dispersion of coagulant by the flash mixing unit that is
necessary to condition the suspended material for subsequent treatment. The design of flocculation systems
should allow for low velocities and avoidance of rapid acceleration to ensure maintenance of a good floc.
When designing a flocculation process, selection of the mode of mixing and determination of the physical
relations and characteristics of the flocculation tanks and clarifiers (sedimentation tanks) are among the first
decisions to be made; either hydraulic mixing or mechanical mixing may be chosen. Where sedimentation
follows flocculation, the retention time for floc formation should be at least 30 minutes.
Flocculation tanks should be designed to permit flexibility of operation and for ease of maintenance and
cleaning. Features that should be considered are a minimum of two tanks and appropriate drainage and
access for removal of sludge and basin cleaning.
Consideration of mechanically or hydraulically mixed tanks should ensure sufficient flexibility of operation is
possible and that G values can be varied to approach optimum flocculation. Incorporating the flocculation
basin into the clarifier unit is considered as the most efficient and economical design.
14
The general basic criteria for a basic rectangular flocculation tank with 2 to 6 flocculation stages are as
follows:
4 5
Energy input Gt = 310 to 210
4
t is in seconds (510 average)
or
-1 -1
G = 10 to 70 S (30 S average)
Detention time 20 to 30 min at maximum daily flow rate.
There are three main configurations for sedimentation tanks: horizontal rectangular basins; upflow
sedimentation tanks; and upflow clarifiers with sludge blanket. Regarding application, rectangular
sedimentation tanks are suited to large-scale plants, whereas upflow and sludge blanket clarifiers are suited
to small and mid-sized water utilities where the rate of flow and raw water quality are constant. The design
details for some basic types of sedimentation tanks are shown in table 3.2. Sedimentation tanks should be
designed on the basis of surface overflow rates (surface loading rates) with due consideration given to the
type of floc generated and water temperature. Inlets of the sedimentation tanks should provide equal
distribution and uniform velocities that maximize the opportunity for particles to settle. Outlets should be
designed to maintain settling velocities and to minimize short-circuiting.
The sedimentation tank should be designed to accommodate the preferred method of sludge removal.
Where a tank must be removed from service for cleaning, it is recommended two tanks be provided.
Consideration should be given to ice formation potential, bypasses, overflows to prevent plant flooding and
means for observing the settling performance.
15
3.2.6 Filtration
In general, minimum of two filters should be provided, with a design working capacity equal to the plant
capacity and each capable of independent operation and backwash. In larger facilities with more than two
filters, production capacity should equal the maximum plant capacity with the largest filter removed from
service.
Filter media depths should not be less than 600 mm (24 inches). As a guide, a gravity filter could consist of
a lower level of silica sand, not less than 200 mm (8 inches) deep and an upper layer of anthracite coal not
less than 450 mm (18 inches) deep. The use of multi-media or proprietary mixed media designs should be
based on examination of data and operating experience to demonstrate their suitability.
Appropriate support media should be provided consistent with the underdrain and wash water distribution
system characteristics.
Filter bottoms or underdrains should be designed to provide uniform distribution of backwash water and/or
scouring air. Porous plate bottoms should not be used with waters high in iron or manganese, scale forming
waters or those susceptible to algal or other biological growths. Filter bottom design should be such that
essentially all head losses in backwashing occur at the final openings. Careful consideration should be given
to the type of filter operation to be employed such as declining rate filtration, influent flow splitting, and
constant rate filtration.
The appropriate backwash rate should be determined by the specific gravity of the medium, the size of the
medium grains and the water temperature. The backwash rate, usually recommended in the filtration
2
process, falls in the range between 36 and 45 m/h (12 – 15 gpm/ft ). There should be enough headspace
over the filter medium for the expansion of the medium during backwashing procedures.
Designers/Engineers should consider several additional issues when designing a granular bed filtration
process: the use of wash troughs, the amount of allowable headloss for filtration, the type of underdrain, type
of filter and waste wash-water handling facility.
16
Table 3.4 Types of Filter Medium and Design Details
Filter Medium Design details
Fine Sand Effective size: 0.25 – 0.35 mm
Uniformity coefficient: 2 – 3
Depth: 1 – 1.2 m (3.3 – 4 ft)
Medium Sand Effective size: 0.45 – 0.65 mm
Uniformity coefficient: 1.4 – 1.7
Depth: 0.6 – 0.75 m (2 – 2.5 ft)
Coarse Sand Effective size: 0.8 – 2 mm
Uniformity coefficient: 1.4 – 1.7
Depth: 0.8 – 2 m (2.6 – 7 ft)
Multi Media – dual or trimedia (sand-coal-garnet) Sand
Effective size: 0.45 – 0.65 mm
Uniformity coefficient: 1.4 – 1.5
Depth: 0.3 m (1 ft)
Anthracite coal
Effective size: 0.9 – 1.4 mm
Uniformity coefficient: 1.4 – 1.5
Depth: 0.45 m (1.5 ft)
Garnet
Effective size: 0.25 – 0.3 mm
Uniformity coefficient: 1.2 – 1.5
Depth: 0.0075 m (0.25 ft)
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Effective size: 0.5 – 1 mm
Uniformity coefficient: 1.5 – 2.5
Depth: 1.8 – 3.6 m (6 - 12 ft)
Considerations should include ensuring production of acceptable filtered water and also plant operational
capabilities. Wash water troughs should be designed to ensure suitable discharge capacity and to enhance
good filter washing. Filter backwash provisions should ensure sufficient rates for suitable filter media
expansion. Auxiliary water or air wash systems are recommended. Filter to waste provisions should also be
provided.
17
the surface of the filter bed known as ‘Schmutzdecke’. This layer composed of dirt and living and dead micro
and macro-organisms from the water, becomes the dominant filter medium as the filter cycle progresses.
The general design criteria for the slow sand filter system are listed below:
2
Filter bed area – 0.05 to 0.15 m per capita per day.
0.5
Number of filters – n = 0.25 Q , where n is the number of filters and is
3
greater than or equal to 2, and Q is the plant flow rate (m /h).
2
Filtration rate – 0.04 to 0.42 m/h (0.01 to 0.14 gpm/ft ).
In general slow sand filters should be limited to cases where the raw water quality is suitable for this type of
filtration and documentation is available to demonstrate the potential effectiveness to produce acceptable
water quality.
Addition of powdered activated carbon (PAC) at selective points in the treatment system may be
advantageous for taste and odor control. The primary characteristic of PAC that differentiates it from
granular activated carbon (GAC) is particle size. The main advantages of using PAC are the low capital
investment costs and the ability to change the PAC dose as the water quality changes. The disadvantages
include high operating costs, low total organic carbon (TOC) removal and sludge disposal problems.
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) is used as a substitute for filter medium or as an additional process in the
conventional treatment process, for the removal of organic compounds including DPBs, those producing
taste and odor and pesticides.
Water may be applied to GAC either upflow or downflow. Downflow columns are the most commonly used in
drinking water treatment. GAC gravity contactors usually find their application in medium and large-scale
water treatment systems. GAC contactors should be designed on the basis of contact time.
Additional factors that must be considered in the design of full-scale systems include:
pretreatment;
GAC particle size;
hydraulic loading rate;
backwashing;
18
adsorption efficiency;
biological activity and control of microbial growth; and
replacement of the medium or regeneration frequency and method of regeneration.
Electrodialysis (ED) and electrodialysis reversal (EDR) processes are limited to treatment of ionic
contaminants and are ineffective for pathogen and organic removal in most cases.
Membranes are often classified by their pore size. A reverse osmosis membrane rejects solutes as small as
0.0001 m and nanofiltration membrane rejects solutes as small as 0.001 m. Microfiltration and
ultrafiltration membranes have a minimum solute rejection of 0.10 and 0.01 m, respectively. The details
about the membranes are summarized in Table 3.4. Cost is a major factor in the case of selection of a
membrane process. Type of membrane, pressure, manufacturer’s specification and guarantee are additional
factors to be considered in the selection.
Special considerations should be given to the disposal of the membrane concentrate. Discharging of
membrane concentrate to a receiving body of water should only be done after careful considerations of each
case from the broader water quality management point of view. Another disposal option is discharging the
concentrate into the local wastewater collection system. Deep well injection is another disposal option but a
costly method. Evaporation ponds are also a viable disposal option. Selection of a particular disposal
method depends on the local environmental conditions, costs and ease of conveyance and disposal.
3.2.10 Fluoridation
Fluoride feeding equipment should be capable of maintaining feed rates within 5% of set rate. Where
fluoridation is practiced, it is recommended the finished water contain 1.0 + 0.2 mg/L fluoride and should not
contain more than 1.5 mg/L fluoride.
3.2.11 Disinfection
Disinfection is the final component in water treatment train designed to further reduce and/or inactivate the
number of pathogenic organisms in drinking water. Disinfectants are also used for other purposes such as,
taste and odour control, oxidation of iron and manganese and as a coagulation and filtration aid. The
potential formation of DPBs, such as trihalomethanes THMs), haloacetic acids, chlorate, chlorite, bromate,
aldehydes and ketones should be considered when designing the disinfection system. The formation of
DPBs depends on the type of disinfectant, the presence of organic material (e.g., TOC) and other
environmental factors. The formation of DPBs can be minimized by removing the DPB precursors.
19
The factors that affect the disinfection efficiency are:
oxidizable substances in the process water;
particulate concentration;
temperature and pH;
contact time; and
level of desired disinfectant residual, if applicable.
Chlorine is the most commonly used disinfectant in drinking water treatment. Chlorination equipment should
be of adequate capacity to maintain a free chlorine residual throughout the system. Where feasible, and
especially for small facilities, consideration should be given to he use of sodium hypochlorite for ease in
operation. Use of gas chlorine should be in conformance with the Guidelines for Chlorine Gas Use in Water
and Wastewater Treatment (Water Security Agency).
Other major disinfectants include chlorine dioxide, chloramines and ozone. Other materials that can act as
disinfectants include potassium permanganate, iodine, bromine, hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet (UV) light.
One of the most important factors for determining the germicidal efficiency of a particular disinfectant and the
adequacy of disinfection is the CT factor. The CT factor is defined as the residual disinfectant concentration
(mg/L) multiplied by the contact time (T, min) between the point of disinfectant application and the point of
residual measurement.
The CT values
Look up CT required from the corresponding to 3 log
Calculate CT Actual
table
C T10 Giardia and 4 log viral
(T10 is the time for 10% of inactivations are the
CT3-log, Giardia basis for determining
the water to pass)
CT4-log, virus the estimated log
inactivation achieved
by the plant on any
given day. Operational
Estimated segment log inactivations information required to
use the CT tables
Log inactivation of Giardia = (CT Actual / CT3-log, Giardia) 3 include: disinfectant
type, temperature, pH
Log inactivation of viruses = (CT Actual / CT4-log, virus) 4 (for chlorine only) and
residual disinfectant
concentration. The CT
value for a particular
disinfectant
corresponding to
inactivation’s of 3-logs
Estimated plant log inactivation by chemical disinfection of Giardia (CT3-log,
Giardia) and 4 logs of
Plant log inactivation of Giardia = (segment log inactivation Giardia) viruses (CT4-log, virus)
can be read from the
Plant log inactivation of viruses = (segment log inactivation viruses) tables which are
shown
20
in Appendix A. These CT values can be used to determine the estimated log inactivation achieved by
applying a disinfectant to water. The ability of a water treatment plant to inactivate protozoa and viruses can
be determined by constructing a disinfection profile using the CT tables (Appendix A). The data to be used
for the construction of disinfection profile must be representative of the entire treatment plant, from the initial
point of disinfectant addition to the entrance to the distribution system.
Ultraviolet light (UV) is recognized as a disinfection alternative to other disinfectants in drinking water
treatment. UV has three spectral bands: 1) 100 to 280 nm (short-wave); 2) 280 to 315 (middle-wave); and 3)
315 to 400 nm (long-wave). Typically, disinfection of UV is carried out by short-wave UV. A secondary
disinfectant is required to maintain the necessary residual throughout the distribution system. The
effectiveness of a UV disinfection system depends on the characteristics of the water, the intensity of UV
radiation, the amount of time the microorganisms are exposed to the radiation and the reactor configuration.
Medium-pressure lamps are generally used for large facilities. They have approximately 15 to 20 times the
germicidal UV intensity of low-pressure lamps. However, these lamps operate at higher temperatures and
with a higher energy consumption rate. UV dose is calculated by intensity times the exposure time in
2 2
seconds and is expressed as mW.s/cm (mJ/cm ). The dose required to disinfect water varies with the
2 2
quality of water, but generally in the range between 24 and 45 mW.s/cm (mJ/cm ). Protozoan parasites,
particularly Giardia and Cryptosporodium, are considerably more resistant to UV inactivation than other
microorganisms. Typically, protozoan parasites require a higher UV dose than that needed for other
pathogenic organisms.
3.2.12 Instrumentations/Controls
Instrumentation and control systems should be selected on the basis of plant complexity, operating
competency and operational needs, the need to control key functions to ensure smooth and continuous plant
operation and the ability of the systems to be operated efficiently. Monitoring consideration should be given
to:
continuous monitoring and recording of finished water turbidity and chlorine residuals where feasible;
raw water temperature, flow and turbidity;
filter rate of flow, loss of head and effluent turbidity;
washwater flow;
clearwell or reservoir levels;
treated water flow and pressure;
process sensitive water quality variables;
indicators, recorders and totalizers appropriate to the process; and
alarm conditions and means for bringing alarms to the attention of responsible operating staff.
3.3 Groundwater
3.3.1 Processes
Groundwater works shall be designed so that the treated water meets turbidity and other water quality
standards specified in the regulations. In general, groundwater treatment facilities should be adequately
disinfected on a continuous basis to ensure greater than or equal to 99.99% (4 log) reduction of viruses.
Many of the waterworks components are already discussed in previous chapters. Although many
Saskatchewan groundwater supplies are characterized by a high hardness and/or high dissolved salt level,
the use of central softening or demineralization has been uncommon and each application for these
processes would have to be reviewed on an individual basis.
21
Where either the raw water quality or the treatment process yields significant precipitate or settleable
material, sedimentation should be incorporated prior to filtration. Sedimentation basin design should be
based on the settleability characteristics and consider sludge removal features.
3.3.3 Filtration
In general, a minimum of two filters should be provided, with a design working capacity equal to the plant
capacity and each capable of independent operation and backwash. In larger facilities with more than two
filters, production capacity should equal the maximum day plant capacity with the largest filter removed from
service.
Filtration rates should be based on the quality of the raw water, pre-treatment provided, filter media
characteristics, operational surveillance available and plant quality control measures. In general, the filtration
rates of 5 m/h (1.67 gpm/ft²) to 12.5 m/h (4.17 gpm/ft²) should be considered. Pressure filters should also be
2
limited to 5 and 12.5 m/h (1.67 to 4.17 gpm/ft ).
Sufficient treated water backwash capability should be provided to develop the appropriate bed expansion
consistent with the water temperature and media characteristics. Except for full depth anthracite filters,
backwash rates in the 36 to 45 m/h (12-15 gpm/ft²) range should be available. Filter bottoms should be
designed to provide uniform distribution of backwash water and the provision of support media should be
based on the nature of the filter bottoms. Porous plate bottoms are not recommended for use with water
containing high levels of iron and manganese or which have significant scale forming tendencies.
Filter media should be durable and should meet applicable American Water Works Association (AWWA)
specifications. Rapid rate gravity filters should incorporate features noted in Section [Link]. Pressure filters
should incorporate features noted in Section [Link].
Media depths should be adequate and a minimum of 600 mm (24 inches) to permit good filtration and
oxidation. A minimum 150 mm (6 inches) cap of anthracite media is recommended over manganese
greensand. Auxiliary air wash facilities are recommended to assist proper backwashing. Manganese
greensand filters should have sample taps at the top and mid-depth points in the media.
In some cases, manganese greensand filtration may be used for arsenic removal from groundwater.
However, addition of iron at a suitable ratio to the influent arsenic is necessary to effectively remove arsenic.
Treatment using substantial pH adjustment through the addition of acids or caustics should only be
undertaken where proper control, neutralization mechanisms and safety features are available.
Filtration technologies such as iron oxide-coated sand filtration systems for arsenic (both arsenite and
arsenate) removal may be applicable to small community groundwater supplies. However, demonstration
testing at pilot-scale level is necessary. Membrane processes should incorporate features noted in
Section 3.2.9.
22
4.1.2 Location
New storage facilities should be located to enable reasonable access during all climatic conditions and
designed that they can remain in operation during maximum anticipated flooding. As far as practically
possible, areas of poor foundations should be avoided.
4.1.3 Protection
All treated water storage reservoirs should have suitable waterproof roofs or covers that exclude birds,
animals, insects and excessive dust. Fencing, locks on access man ways and other necessary precautions
should be provided to prevent trespassing, vandalism and sabotage.
4.1.4 Freezing
All treated water storage structures and their appurtenances, especially the riser pipes, overflows and vents
should be designed to prevent freezing which will interfere with proper functioning. Elevated storage should
be provided with facilities for heating and circulating the water.
4.1.5 Safety
The safety of employees should be considered in the design of a storage structure. As a minimum, such
matters shall conform to pertinent Occupational Health and Safety Regulations. Ladders, ladder guards,
balcony railings and safely located entrance hatches should be provided where applicable. Elevated tanks
with riser pipes over 200 mm (8 inches) in diameter should have protective bars over the riser openings in
the tank.
4.2 Capacities
4.2.1 Sizing
Storage facilities should have sufficient capacity, as determined by engineering studies, to meet domestic
demands, plant operating requirements and where fire protection is provided, fire flow demands.
Roofs, sidewalls and floors should be watertight with no openings except properly designed vents, man way
entrances, overflows, risers, drains, etc.
4.3.2 Materials
Steel structures should follow current AWWA standards concerning steel tanks, standpipes, reservoirs and
elevated tanks wherever they are applicable. Storage structures constructed of other materials should meet
these guidelines and conform to applicable industry standards, such as AWWA, CSA, ASTM or CGSB.
23
4.3.3 Protective Coatings and/or Cathodic Protection
Proper protection should be given to metal surfaces by paints or other protective coatings, by cathodic
protection or by both. After proper curing, the coating should not adversely affect water quality. Cathodic
protection should be designed and installed by competent technical personnel.
4.3.4 Drains
It is recommended that drains on a water storage structure do not have a direct connection to a sewer or a
storm drain. The design should allow draining the storage facility for cleaning and maintenance without
causing loss of pressure in the distribution system.
4.3.6 Entrances
Finished water storage reservoirs should be designed with reasonably convenient access to the interior for
cleaning and maintenance. Manhole entrances above the waterline:
should be framed at least 150 mm (6 inches), above the surface of the surrounding area. The grade
surrounding exterior manholes should be sloped away from the manhole to prevent flooding by
surface runoff;
should be fitted with a solid watertight cover that overlaps the framed opening and extends down
around the frame at least 50 mm (2 inches);
should be hinged at one side; and
should have a locking device.
Manhole entrances into a clearwell reservoir below a treatment facility should be framed at least 150 mm
(6 inches) above the finished floor and shall be covered with a solid, durable lid so designed as to prevent
entry of water.
4.3.7 Vents
Treated water storage structures should be vented separate from any overflows. Open construction between
the sidewall and roof is not considered acceptable. Vents should prevent the entrance of surface water and
rain water, exclude birds and animals and exclude insects and dust as much as practically possible.
Ground level structure vents should terminate in an inverted U construction with the opening 600 mm to 900
mm (24 to 36 inches) above the roof or sod and covered with twenty-four mesh non-corrodible screen
installed within the pipe at a location least susceptible to vandalism.
4.3.8 Cleaning/Disinfection
Finished surfaces and floor slopes should be designed to facilitate cleaning and disinfection. Treated water
storage reservoirs require cleaning and disinfection prior to being placed in service, in accordance with the
latest applicable AWWA standard. Construction specifications should identify an appropriate method of
disinfecting and bacteriological sampling/testing. Cleaning and disinfection should include the roof of the
tank or reservoir, from which condensate may drop back into the water supply.
4.4.2 Location
Due consideration should be given to proper location, protection from corrosion by elevating tanks above
floor levels, adequate sizing, bypass piping and valving to facilitate maintenance, servicing access ports,
drain, air blow-off means for adding air and pressure operated start-stop controls for the pumps.
24
5. Distribution
5.1 General
For the purposes of these guidelines, conventional municipal distribution systems, which provide fire
protection, are referred to as municipal waterworks. Very small systems, which do not provide fire
protection, are referred to as domestic waterworks.
Design and construction of water distribution systems should comply with all local or provincial bylaws and
regulations. For distribution extensions, the past performance and records of the municipality should be
reviewed to assure compatibility with existing systems.
Wherever possible, water demands and peaking factors based on usage records for the waterworks should
be used for design of distribution systems. When such records do not exist or are unreliable, water demands
and peaking factors derived from installations that are similar in terms of climate, locale, size and character
of population, etc. may be used.
It should be ensured that there will be no physical connection between the distribution system and any pipes,
pumps, hydrants or tanks whereby unsafe water or other contaminating materials may be discharged or
drawn into the system.
In cases where water loading stations form part of the system, due consideration should be given to
preventing contamination of either the public supply or treated water vessels being filled. In the design of
water loading stations, attention should be given to assuring that there will be no backflow to the public water
supply, that the piping arrangement will prevent contaminants being transferred from one hauling vessel to
another and that hoses will not be contaminated by contact with the ground.
Pumping stations should be designed to provide adequate space for the installation of additional units if
needed and for the safe servicing of all equipment. Consideration should be given to providing hoist-beams,
crane-ways, floor openings, etc. for servicing and removal of heavy or bulky equipment.
For worker safety, ladders, ladder guards, balcony railings, etc. should be provided where needed and the
pertinent Occupational Health and Safety Regulations should be adhered to.
Pump station buildings should be properly ventilated, heated and adequate lighting provided in accordance
with all local and provincial regulations. Stations, which are staffed for extended periods, should be provided
with treated water, lavatory and toilet facilities. Wastes should be handled so as to prevent contamination of
a public water supply.
5.2.2 Pumps
At least two pumping units should be provided (in addition to any pumps required to provide fire flows). With
any one pump out of service, the remaining pumps should be capable of serving the maximum daily pumping
demand of the system.
Pumping units should have ample capacity to supply the peak demand and pressure conditions without
dangerous overloading, be driven by prime movers able to operate against maximum head, have spare parts
and tools available and be served by control equipment that has proper heater and overload protection for air
temperature encountered.
Due consideration should be given to such factors as avoiding suction lift, if possible, or maintaining it within
allowable limits; priming of pumps and protection of pump station headers against pressure surges.
Booster pumping stations should contain not less than two pumps with capacities such that peak demand
can be satisfied with the largest pump out of service. Consideration should be given to the provision of
standby power generation in the event of power outages.
25
5.3 Distribution Systems
5.3.1 Materials
Pipes, fittings, valves, fire hydrants and other appurtenances should conform to the latest standards issued
by AWWA, CSA or CGSB. Anticipated water quality and bedding soil characteristics should be considered in
selecting pipe materials, which will protect against both internal and external pipe corrosion.
Due consideration should be paid to the possible presence of sub-surface contaminants and the potential of
such contaminants migrating through mains into the water supply. (For example, soil contaminated by
hydrocarbons in the vicinity of existing or abandoned petroleum marketing installations has been known to
impart taste and/or odour problems to water by migration through some plastic pipes.)
5.3.2 Placement
Dead-ends should be minimized by looping of all mains. Where dead-end mains cannot be avoided, they
should be provided with a fire hydrant, blow-off or other acceptable measures to prevent problems
associated with stagnation. For domestic waterworks, consideration may be given to the use of "yard
hydrants" for flushing purposes. No flushing device should be directly connected to a sewer.
Adequate separation of water mains and sewers should be maintained with due consideration given to such
matters as pipe materials, soil conditions, service and connections into the mains, etc. Water mains and
sewer mains, under normal conditions, should not be installed in the same trench.
Precautions should be taken in the case of pressurized sewers (and/or sewage force mains) to prevent
potential contamination of water supply mains. All water mains should be covered with sufficient earth cover
or insulation below finished street/road grades to prevent freezing.
Water main bedding and backfill should be placed so that the pipe is adequately supported and protected.
Fittings and appurtenances should be provided with reaction blocking to prevent movement.
The minimum size of mains for municipal waterworks (fire protection provided) should be 150 mm (6 inches).
Sizing of mains for domestic waterworks (no fire protection) should be sized on the basis of hydraulic
requirements with due regard to future maintenance requirements such as the potential need for "yard
hydrants" to assist "swabbing" operations.
Fire hydrants should have a bottom valve size of at least 125 mm (5 inches), one 115 mm (4 ½ inch) pumper
nozzle and two 64 mm (2 1/2 inch) nozzles. Fire hydrant leads should be a minimum of 150 mm (6 inch)
diameter. Valving of hydrant leads is recommended.
Fire hydrant drains should be plugged and the barrels pumped dry during freezing weather where the
groundwater is permanently above the drain port. Where hydrant drains are not plugged, they should drain
to gravel beds or to dry wells provided exclusively for that purpose. Hydrant drains should not be connected
to or located within 3 m (10 feet) of sanitary sewers or storm drains.
Fire hydrants should only be installed on water mains capable of supplying fire flow requirements.
26
Valve positions should be recorded on plans of record ("as-constructed" drawings) or other such
documentation to facilitate their location for repair operations or for adjustments during future paving work,
etc.
When pipe laying is not in progress, open ends should be effectively plugged, sealed or covered to prevent
the entry of rodents, foreign material or water into the pipe. Pipelines should be flushed after the pressure
test has been made and prior to chlorination.
Pipelines in a new distribution system or in an extension to an existing system should be chlorinated so that
a chlorine residual of 10 mg/L exists in all sections of the pipeline after 24 hours of contact time.
Where a system is repaired the repaired portion should be chlorinated in accordance with the above
procedures or by maintaining a chlorine residual of 100 mg/L for a contact time of one hour. All valves and
other appurtenances should be operated while a pipeline is being chlorinated.
After completion of the chlorination process, the chlorinated water in the pipeline should be thoroughly
removed by flushing and the replacement water sampled and tested for bacterial quality before use.
Appendix A
Table 1: CT values (CT99.9) for 99.9 percent inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts by Free Chlorine at
0
0.5 C or lower* (3-log inactivation)
pH
Free residual (mg/L) 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
0.4 137 163 195 237 277 329 390
0.6 141 168 200 239 286 342 407
0.8 145 172 205 246 295 354 422
1.0 148 176 210 253 304 365 437
1.2 152 180 215 259 313 376 451
1.4 155 184 221 266 321 387 464
1.6 157 189 226 273 329 397 477
1.8 162 193 231 279 338 407 489
2.0 165 197 236 286 346 417 500
2.2 169 201 242 297 353 426 511
2.4 172 205 247 298 361 435 522
2.6 175 209 252 304 368 444 533
2.8 178 213 257 310 375 452 543
3.0 181 217 261 316 382 460 552
27
Table 2: CT values (CT99.9) for 99.9 percent inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts by Free Chlorine at
0
5 C* (3-log inactivation)
pH
Free residual (mg/L) 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
0.4 97 117 139 166 198 236 279
0.6 100 120 143 171 204 244 291
0.8 103 122 146 175 210 252 301
1.0 105 125 149 179 216 260 312
1.2 107 127 152 183 221 267 320
1.4 109 130 155 187 227 274 329
1.6 111 132 158 192 232 281 337
1.8 114 135 162 196 238 287 345
2.0 116 138 165 200 243 294 353
2.2 118 140 169 204 248 300 361
2.4 120 143 172 209 253 306 368
2.6 122 146 175 213 258 312 375
2.8 124 148 178 217 263 318 382
3.0 126 151 182 221 268 324 389
* These CT values achieve greater than a 99.99 percent inactivation of viruses. CT values between the
indicated pH values may be determined by linear interpolation. CT values between the indicated
temperatures of different tables may be determined by linear interpolation. If no interpolation is used, use
the CT99.9 value at the lower temperature and at the higher pH.
Table 3: CT values (CT99.9) for 99.9 percent inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts by Free Chlorine at
0
10 C* (3-log inactivation)
pH
Free residual (mg/L) 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
0.4 73 88 104 125 149 177 209
0.6 75 90 107 128 153 183 218
0.8 78 92 110 131 158 189 226
1.0 79 94 112 134 162 195 234
1.2 80 95 114 137 166 200 240
1.4 82 98 116 140 170 206 247
1.6 83 99 119 144 174 211 253
1.8 86 101 122 147 179 215 259
2.0 87 104 124 150 182 221 265
2.2 89 105 127 153 186 225 271
2.4 90 107 129 157 190 230 276
2.6 92 110 131 160 194 234 281
2.8 93 111 134 163 197 239 287
3.0 95 113 137 166 201 243 292
28
Table 4: CT values (CT99.9) for 99.9 percent inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts by Free Chlorine at
0
15 C* (3-log inactivation)
Free residual (mg/L) pH
6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
0.4 49 59 70 83 99 118 140
0.6 50 60 72 86 102 122 146
0.8 52 61 73 88 105 126 151
1.0 53 63 75 90 108 130 156
1.2 54 64 76 92 111 134 160
1.4 55 65 78 94 114 137 165
1.6 56 66 79 96 116 141 169
1.8 57 68 81 98 119 144 173
2.0 58 69 83 100 122 147 177
2.2 59 70 85 102 124 150 181
2.4 60 72 86 105 127 153 184
2.6 61 73 88 107 129 156 188
2.8 62 74 89 109 132 159 191
3.0 63 76 91 111 134 162 195
* These CT values achieve greater than a 99.99 percent inactivation of viruses. CT values between the
indicated pH values may be determined by linear interpolation. CT values between the indicated
temperatures of different tables may be determined by linear interpolation. If no interpolation is used, use
the CT99.9 value at the lower temperature and at the higher pH.
Table 5: CT values (CT99.9) for 99.9 percent inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts by Free Chlorine at
0
20 C* (3-log inactivation)
Free residual (mg/L) pH
6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
0.4 36 44 52 62 74 89 105
0.6 38 45 54 64 77 92 109
0.8 39 46 55 66 79 95 113
1.0 39 47 56 67 81 98 117
1.2 40 48 57 69 83 100 120
1.4 41 49 58 70 85 103 123
1.6 42 50 59 72 87 105 126
1.8 43 51 61 74 89 108 129
2.0 44 52 62 75 91 110 132
2.2 44 53 63 77 93 113 135
2.4 45 54 65 78 95 115 138
2.6 46 55 66 80 97 117 141
2.8 47 56 67 81 99 119 143
3.0 47 57 68 83 101 122 146
29
Table 6: CT values (CT99.9) for 99.9 percent inactivation of Giardia lamblia cysts by Free Chlorine at
0
25 C* (3-log inactivation)
Free residual (mg/L) PH
6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
0.4 24 29 35 42 50 59 70
0.6 25 30 36 43 51 61 73
0.8 26 31 37 44 53 63 75
1.0 26 31 37 45 54 65 78
1.2 27 32 38 46 55 67 80
1.4 27 33 39 47 57 69 82
1.6 28 33 40 48 58 70 84
1.8 29 34 41 49 60 72 86
2.0 29 35 41 50 61 74 88
2.2 30 35 42 51 62 75 90
2.4 30 36 43 52 63 77 92
2.6 31 37 44 53 65 78 94
2.8 31 37 45 54 66 80 96
3.0 32 38 46 55 67 81 97
* These CT values achieve greater than a 99.99 percent inactivation of viruses. CT values between the
indicated pH values may be determined by linear interpolation. CT values between the indicated
temperatures of different tables may be determined by linear interpolation. If no interpolation is used, use the
CT99.9 value at the lower temperature and at the higher pH.
30
Table 8: CT values for inactivation of Giardia cysts by Chlorine dioxide, pH 6.0–9.0
Inactivation (log)
0
Temperature ( C) 2.5 3
1 52.0 63.0
2 44.5 53.8
3 37.0 44.5
4 29.5 35.3
5 22.0 26.0
6 21.4 25.4
7 20.8 24.8
8 20.2 24.2
9 19.6 23.6
10 19.0 23.0
11 18.4 22.2
12 17.8 21.4
13 17.2 20.6
14 16.6 19.8
15 16.0 19.0
16 15.4 18.2
17 14.8 17.4
18 14.2 16.6
19 13.6 15.8
20 13.0 15.0
21 12.2 14.2
22 11.4 13.4
23 10.6 12.6
24 9.8 11.8
25 9.0 11.0
31
Table 10: CT values for inactivation of Giardia cysts by Chloramine, pH 6.0 – 9.0
Inactivation (log)
0
Temperature ( C) 2.5 3
1 3,170 3,800
2 2,835 3,400
3 2,500 3,000
4 2,165 2,600
5 1,830 2,200
6 1,772 2,130
7 1,714 2,060
8 1,656 1,990
9 1,598 1,920
10 1,540 1,850
11 1,482 1,780
12 1,424 1,710
13 1,366 1,640
14 1,308 1,570
15 1,250 1,500
16 1,183 1,420
17 1,116 1,340
18 1,049 1,260
19 982 1,180
20 915 1,100
21 857 1,030
22 799 960
23 741 890
24 683 820
25 625 750
32
Table 12: CT values for inactivation of Giardia cysts by Ozone
Inactivation (log)
0
Temperature ( C) 2.5 3
1 2.40 2.90
2 2.20 2.65
3 2.00 2.40
4 1.80 2.15
5 1.60 1.90
6 1.52 1.81
7 1.44 1.71
8 1.36 1.62
9 1.28 1.52
10 1.20 1.43
11 1.12 1.33
12 1.04 1.24
13 0.95 1.14
14 0.87 1.05
15 0.79 0.95
16 0.75 0.90
17 0.71 0.86
18 0.68 0.81
19 0.64 0.77
20 0.60 0.72
21 0.56 0.67
22 0.52 0.62
23 0.48 0.58
24 0.44 0.53
25 0.40 0.48
33
References nd
1. Kawamura, S. (2000). Integrated Design and Operation of Water Treatment Facilities. 2 edition, John
Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 326.
4. Letterman, R.D. (Editor). (1999). Water Quality and Treatment – A Handbook of Community Water
th
Supplies. AWWA, McGraw-Hill, 5 ed., New York.
5. USEPA (1999). Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking Guidance Manual. EPA 815-R 99-013,
Washington, DC.
34