0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views8 pages

NTC 2018 Verification Example 001

1) A continuous beam-column is subjected to axial load of 1400 kN and major-axis bending moment of 200 kN-m. The example is analyzed according to the Italian NTC-2018 steel design code. 2) The results of the SAP2000 analysis are compared to independent hand calculations, showing exact agreement for all output parameters. 3) Parameters checked include section compactness, compression, shear, and bending capacities with and without reductions for axial force and shear. The interaction capacity is also checked.

Uploaded by

Mohamed Abo-Zaid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views8 pages

NTC 2018 Verification Example 001

1) A continuous beam-column is subjected to axial load of 1400 kN and major-axis bending moment of 200 kN-m. The example is analyzed according to the Italian NTC-2018 steel design code. 2) The results of the SAP2000 analysis are compared to independent hand calculations, showing exact agreement for all output parameters. 3) Parameters checked include section compactness, compression, shear, and bending capacities with and without reductions for axial force and shear. The interaction capacity is also checked.

Uploaded by

Mohamed Abo-Zaid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000


REVISION NO.: 0

NTC 2018 Example 001

WIDE FLANGE SECTION UNDER COMBINED COMPRESSION & BENDING

EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
In this example a continuous beam-column is subjected to factored axial load P =
1400 kN and major-axis bending moment M = 200 kN-m. The beam is
continuously braced to avoid any buckling effects. This example was tested using
the Italian NTC-2018 steel frame design code. The design capacities are
compared with independent hand calculated results.

GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING

A M

A
L Section A-A

L = 0.4 m

Material Properties Loading Design Properties


E = 210x103 MPa P = 1400 kN fy = 235 MPa
v = 0.3 M = 200 kN-m Section: 457x191x98 UB
G = 80769 MPa

TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED


➢ Section compactness check (beam-column)
➢ Section compression capacity
➢ Section shear capacity
➢ Section bending capacity with compression & shear reductions
➢ Interaction capacity, D/C

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 1


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 0

RESULTS COMPARISON

Independent results are taken from hand calculations based on the CSI steel
design documentation contained in the file “[Link],” which is
available through the program “Help” menu.

Percent
Output Parameter SAP2000 Independent Difference

Compactness Class 2 Class 2 0.00%


Section Compression Resistance,
2797.6 2797.6 0.00%
Nc,Rd (kN)
Section Shear Resistance,
719.2 719.2 0.00%
Vc,Rd,y (kN)
Section Plastic Bending Resistance,
499.1 499.1 0.00%
Mc,y,Rd (kN-m)
Section Bending Resistance Axially
Reduced, 310.8 310.8 0.00%
MN,y,Rd (kN-m)
Section Bending Resistance Shear
Reduced, 481.3 481.3 0.00%
MV,y,Rd (kN-m)
Interaction Capacity, D/C 0.741 0.741 0.00%

COMPUTER FILE: NTC 2018 EX001

CONCLUSION
The results show an exact comparison with the independent results.

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 2


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 0

HAND CALCULATION

Properties:
Material: S275 Steel
E = 210000 MPa
fy = 235 MPa
Section: 457x191x98 UB
A = 12,500 mm2
b = 192.8 mm, tf = 19.6 mm, h = 467.2 mm, tw = 11.4 mm, r = 10.2 mm
hw  h  2t f  467.2  2 •19.6  428mm

d  h  2  t f  r   467.2  2 • 19.6  10.2  407.6mm

b  tw  2r 192.8  11.4  2 • 10.2


c   80.5 mm
2 2
Wpl,y = 2,230,000 mm3
Other:
 M 0  1.05

Loadings:
P  1400kN axial load
M y  200 kN-m bending load at one end
Results in the following internal forces:
NEd  1400 kN
VEd  500 kN

M y , Ed  200 kN-m

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 3


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 0

Section Compactness:
235 235
  1
fy 235

1 N Ed 
1    1    1
2  2htw f y 
1 1, 400, 000 
 1    2.7818  1, so
2  2 • 467.2 • 11.4 • 235 
  1.0

Localized Buckling for Flange:


For the tip in compression under combined bending & compression
9 9 • 1
 cl .1   9
 1
c 80.5
e    4.11
t f 19.6

e  4.11 cl .1  9
So Flange is Class 1 in combined bending and compression

Localized Buckling for Web:


  0.5, so
396 396 • 1
 cl .1    33.00 for combined bending & compression
13  1 13 • 1  1
d 407.6
e    35.75
tw 11.4

e  35.75  cl .1  33.00


456 456 • 1
 cl .2    38.00
13  1 13 • 1  1
e  35.75  cl.2  38.00

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 4


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 0

So Web is Class 2 in combined bending & compression.

Since Web is Class 2, Section is Class 2 in combined bending & compression.

Section Compression Capacity


Af y 12,500 • 235
N c , Rd  N pl , Rd  
M 0 1.05

Nc, Rd  2797.6 kN

Section Shear Capacity


AV , y  A  2bt f  t f  tw  2r   12,500  2 • 192.8 • 19.6  19.6 11.4  2 • 10.2 

AV , y  5,565.5mm2

fy 235
Vc , Rd , y  Avy  • 5,565.5
M 0 3 1.05 3

Vc, Rd , y  719.2 kN

  1.0

h 467.1 72 235 72 235


  37.5    72
tw 11.4  fy 1.0 235

So no shear buckling needs to be checked.

Section Bending Capacity


Wpl , y f y 2, 230, 000 • 235
M c , y , Rd  M pl , y , Rd  
M 0 1.05

M c, y , Rd  499.1kN-m

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 5


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 0

with Shear Reduction


VEd  500kN  0.5 • Vc, Rd  359.6kN Shear Reduction is needed

Av  htw  467.2 •11.4  4,879.2mm2

2
 2V   2 • 500 2
   Ed  1    1  0.1525
V   719.2 
 c , Rd 

 Av 2   0.1525 • 4879.22 


W 
 pl , y 4t  f yk  2, 230, 000   • 235
4 • 11.4
M y ,V , Rd  w 
    M y ,c , Rd
M 0 1.05

MV ,r , Rd  481.3kN-m

with Compression Reduction

N Ed 1400
n   0.50
N pl , Rd 2797.6
A  2bt f 12,500  2 •192.8 •19.6
a   0.40  0.5
A 12,500
1 n 1  0.5
M N , y , Rd  M pl , y , Rd  499.1 •
1  0.5a 1  0.5 • 0.4
M N , y , Rd  310.8kN-m

Interaction Capacity: Compression & Bending


Section Bending & Compression Capacity
Formula NTC 4.2.39
2 5n
D  M y , Ed   M z , Ed  2
 200  M y , Ed
      310.8   0  0.414   0.644
C  M N , y , Rd   M N , z , Rd    M N , y , Rd

D
 0.644
C

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 6


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 0

Member Bending & Compression Capacity: Method B


k factors used are taken from the software, and determined from Method 2 in
Annex B of Eurocode 3.
k yy  0.540

k yz  0.420

kzy  0.600

kzz  0.700

Formula NTC 4.2.37


D N Ed M y , Ed M z , Ed
  k yy  k yz
C  y Af yk W f Wpl , z f yk
 LT pl , y yk
M1 M1 M1

D 1, 400 200
  0.54  0
C 112,500  235 1
2, 230, 000  235
1.05 1.05
D
 0.5  0.22  0
C
D
 0.717
C

Formula NTC 4.2.38


D N Ed M y , Ed M z , Ed
  k zy  k zz
C  z Af yk W f Wpl , z f yk
 LT pl , y yk
M1 M1 M1

D 1, 400 200
  0.600  0
C 112,500  235 1
2, 230, 000  235
1.05 1.05
D
 0.5  0.24  0
C

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 7


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 0

D
 0.741 (Governs)
C

NTC 2018 Example 001 - 8

You might also like