Scribd
Upload
234 views2 pages

Prototype

The document outlines the prototype design of an academic social network called Noteboard. It identifies stakeholders and their requirements through a questionnaire. The design includes architecture, user interface mockups, and a task analysis. Six students contributed equally to the project. The appendices provide more details on requirements gathering, use cases, interface designs, and meeting minutes.

Uploaded by

NoteBoard
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
234 views2 pages

Prototype

The document outlines the prototype design of an academic social network called Noteboard. It identifies stakeholders and their requirements through a questionnaire. The design includes architecture, user interface mockups, and a task analysis. Six students contributed equally to the project. The appendices provide more details on requirements gathering, use cases, interface designs, and meeting minutes.

Uploaded by

NoteBoard
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Prototype Design

Noteboard
Academic Social Network

Name Contribution
Jose Lima 16.6%
Tim Macfarlane 16.6%
Toby Smith 16.6%
Stephen Goater 16.6%
Scott Jefferies 16.6%
Chen Feng 16.6%

13th December 2010

University of Bath
Department of Computer Science
Contents
1 Requirements 1
1.1 Stakeholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Use Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.4 High Priority Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2 Design 6
2.1 Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2 User Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2.1 UI Design Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3 Task Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3 Progress Report 10

4 Appendix 13
4.1 Appendix A: User Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.1.1 Questionnaire Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.2 Appendix B: Use Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
4.3 Appendix C: Requirements Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.3.1 Functional Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.3.2 Non-Functional Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.4 Appendix D: Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.4.1 Entity Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.4.2 Relation Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.4.3 Sitemap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.4.4 User Interface Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.4.5 Design Evaluations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4.5 Appendix E: Hierarchical Task Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.6 Appendix F: Meeting Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

You might also like