1
Inquiry Essay
This quote perfectly summarizes the intention of this essay: “Taking an inquiry stance on
leadership means that teachers challenge the purposes and underlying assumptions of
educational change efforts rather than simply helping to specify or carry out the most
effective methods for predetermined ends” (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1999, p. 295). My
experience at Graduate School of Education (GSE) has constantly enabled me to look at and
dig into individuals’ lives and thoughts – my peers, teachers – their confusions and mine
interwoven, lead me to an inquiry into literacy environment in the US. In addition to some
effective pedagogies, I have learned more regarding the assumptions of education in this
context. These thoughts started from a question mark, and probably will end with another.
Nonetheless, I hope these thoughts reflected in the framework of Inquiry as Stance will be a
new window towards what is strange and worth questioning, looking from an outsider’s
perspective.
To begin with, this essay will focus on the basic understanding of Inquiry as Stance. This
stance improves the literacy environment by stimulating teacher initiative through community
communication.
Inquiry as Stance
Inquiry as Stance centers the role of community communication. Cochran-Smith and
Lytle (1999) conceptualize that there are three types of relationships between knowledge and
practice in education (i.e., knowledge-for-practice, knowledge-in-practice, and
knowledge-of-practice). Knowledge-for-practice emphasizes on the theoretical aspect of
knowledge (e.g., the knowledge coming from the GSE reading assignment),
2
knowledge-in-practice emphasizes on the practical aspect of knowledge (e.g., the knowledge
coming from the GSE fieldwork teaching assignment), and knowledge-of-practice
emphasizes on the interactive aspect of knowledge between knowledge and practice (e.g., the
knowledge coming from interviews with reading specialists in our course, where we
discussed the problems we had in assisting students together), which is considered critical in
the context of a community. The goal of Inquiry as Stance, thus, is to seek the
knowledge-of-practice. Two main characteristics set it apart from other stances: one is
marked by a collaborative relationship rather than a traditional expert-novice relationship
(Smith & Lytle, 1999, p. 292), and the other is marked by its end, where it requires teachers
to challenge existing ideas and make changes in the community. The connotation of “Inquiry”
is reflected in this ongoing process of asking questions about the current state of the
community, without the necessity of reaching a conclusion, because one question usually
leads to another (Simon, 2015, p. 52). Inquiry as Stance highlights the initiative of teachers to
lead educational change, or even social change.
The Importance of Inquiry
Simon’s case study (2015) illustrates the importance of Inquiry as Stance to students with
the experience of how a teacher, Laura, communicates with one of her students. Laura was
teaching at a school where “75 percent of students were African American” (p. 53), and Will,
a student in her class (who had been labeled “disengaged” by other teachers) suddenly
talked with Laura angrily, saying that he could not believe that the school did not teach them
Emmett Till’ s murder in history classes. Laura reflected this experience and summarized
the importance of inquiry powerfully: “It is impossible to have faith in an institution if you
3
believe it is not teaching what you think is important.” Without this interaction as an
opportunity to inquiry and critical literacy, or if all teachers kept teaching solely according
to the existing syllabus, teachers may never have learned that students like Will were
actually engaged, and the problem truly lied in the school’s overlook of black history. This
example shows how cold the environment of literacy (in this case, history classes) can be if
it is lack of inquiry, as its highness is making it gradually lose students’ trust.
In addition, Inquiry as Stance can not be separated from the discussion of literacy.
“Literacy was not something you kept for yourself; it was to be passed on to others, to the
community. Literacy was something to share” (Perry, 2003, p. 14). In other words, literacy
practice must take place in a community, which is the environment for literacy. Inquiry can
also enhance critical literacy and learning across teachers’ professional life spans (Campano,
Ghiso, & Sanchez, 2013; Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 2009; Freedman & Appleman, 2009;
Hamre & Oyler, 2004; Nieto, 2003; Schulz & Mandzuk, 2005; Schultz & Ravitch, 2013;
Simon, 2013a, 2013b; Whitney et al., 2008). Simon (2015) provides examples of the Bread
Loaf Teacher Network, the National Writing Project, and the Philadelphia Teachers Learning
Cooperative to show how inquiry communities can influence the development of more
critical and culturally relevant curriculums and pedagogies (p. 44). These networks have all
established for over 30 years and have been contributed to local literacy issues, such as
providing more equitable approaches to responding to students’ writing (Simon, 2013b).
Reflection: my inquiry at GSE
The first moment making me begin the inquiry into the literacy environment in the
context of the US was when I asked a classmate, Elsa (pseudonym) if she had been assessed.
4
She was talking about her case study of helping another Hispanic boy with disabilities in
perfect English until I asked this question. She suddenly paused and answered slowly: “Yes, I
have been assessed, since I am in a Spanish-speaking family. I could hardly remember any
specific process though...all I remember is just that I was struggling a lot.” Elsa’s impressive
vulnerability directly showed the impact of her identity as a Hispanic to me, instead of the
identity of being a normal American citizen. Her aptitude has already demonstrated that she
did not need to struggle intellectually, but the label of her identity seems too crucial,
determining whether a student should be specifically assessed. This event made me question:
though many tests are designed to help students, are they truly empower students or promote
discrimination, when racial identity (rather than performance) is always associated with a
negative label such as “likely to struggle”?
The second moment was when I heard Powell’s podcast mentioning the South tireless
efforts against black people’s rights, which led to this question: besides the historical factor,
what makes the South against black people till now? I turned to the professor at that class,
read several papers, and was introduced to the concept of “implicit bias”, which was not
spoken, but hidden in people’s subconsciousness. Implicit bias is shaped by a literacy
environment where history and medium continue to reinforce the negative impression of a
particular identity. People in the south, for example, are implicitly bias against black people;
Hispanic pupils requiring special assessments can be another type of implicit bias; the subtle
strangeness for being Asian people in the US probably has to do with it as well (my Asian
classmates echoing). The next question is, how can we make change?
In a recent interview with an American classmate, Lindsay (pseudonym), mentioned that
5
ironically, even in a multicultural class, she could not ask questions that she was extremely
curious about to our classmates from other backgrounds, because she was fear of offending
others in the current tense racial climate. To make change is hard. Though I do not find the
answer to this final question, it was only after I learned Inquiry as Stance that I realized if I
did not start and keep asking questions in chitchats, interviews, and office hours, I would
never have learned that these confusions were worth discussing to the classmates and
teachers at GSE community as well. My inquiry has also become the initiative of writing
these essays now – to further explore how emotion such as fear may impact literacy.
6
References
Campano, G., Ghiso, M. P., & Sanchez, L. (2013). “Nobody knows the ... amount of a
person”: Elementary students critiquing dehumanization through organic critical
literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 97-124.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher
Learning in Communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–305.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research in the
next generation. New York: Teachers College.
Freedman, S. W., & Appleman, D. (2009). “In it for the long haul”: How teacher education
can contribute to teacher retention in high-poverty, urban schools. Journal of Teacher
Education, 60(3), 323-337.
Hamre, B., & Oyler, C. (2004). Preparing teachers for inclusive classrooms: Learning from a
collaborative inquiry group. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(2), 154-163.
Nieto, S. (2003). Challenging current notions of “highly qualified teachers” through work in a
teachers’ inquiry group. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 386-398.
Perry, T. (2003). Freedom for literacy and literacy for freedom: The African-American
philosophy of education, in T. Perry, C. Steele, and A. Hilliard, Young, Gifted, and
Black: Promoting High Achievement Among African-American Students, Boston, MA:
Beacon.
Schultz, K., & Ravitch, S. M. (2015). Narratives of learning to teach: Taking on professional
identities. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 35-46.
Schulz, R., & Mandzuk, D. (2005). Learning to teach, learning to inquire: A 3-year study of
7
teacher candidates' experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 315-331.
Simon, R. (2013a). Literacy teacher education as critical inquiry. In C. Kosnik, J. Rowsell, P.
Williamson, R. Simon, & C. Beck (Eds.), Literacy teacher educators: Preparing
teachers for a changing world (pp. 121-134). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Simon, R. (2013b). “Starting with what is”: Exploring response and responsibility to student
writing through collaborative inquiry. English Education, 45(2), 115-146.
Simon, R. (2015). “I’m Fighting My Fight, and I’m Not Alone Anymore”: The Influence of
Communities of Inquiry. English Education, 48(1), 41-71.
Whitney, A., Blau, S., Bright, A., Cabe, R., Dewar, T., Levin, J., Macias, R., & Rogers, P.
(2008). Beyond strategies: Teacher practice, writing process, and the influence of
inquiry. English Education, 40(3), 201-230.