INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF REGULAR AND IRREGULAR FLAT SLAB FOR MULTISTOREYED BUILDING UNDER TWO SEISMIC ZONES USING ETABS AND SAFE ‘THIMMAYAPALLY DILEEP KUMAR’, A. MOWNIKA VARDHAN? 'M, Tech (Structural Engineering), Department of Civil Engineering, Vishwa Bharathi College of Engineering ‘Adj. Brundavan colony, Nizampet road, Opp. INTUH, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500085,, 2 Assistant Professor (M.Tech), Department of Civil Engineering, MVR College of Engineering and Technology, Adj. Brundavan colony, Nizampet road, Opp. INTUH, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500085 ABSTRACT: Construction industry is being revolutionised with ‘growing technology and innovation. Man started to reach shy not in any aeroplane but with the height of building. Tall structures have considerably reduced the problem of shelter but are considered highly susceptible to seismic Toads and uneconomical. Both the problems are aroused due to high weight of the building. Of all the structural ‘members in a building slabs are considered 10 be ‘oceupying high area and the load of the building is mostly ‘contributed due to slab, In general for commercial areas ‘normal slabs are not been considered. as the spans ‘benween the supports are more which leads to increasing jn deflection and ultimately provision of huge depth and percentage of steel is increased beyond the codal provision once such solution o reduce the lab depth and provide economical design is flat slabs technology. LINTRODUCTIO! ‘The horizontal floor system resists the gravity load (dead load and live load) acting on it and. transmits this to the vertical framing systems. In this, process, the floor system is subjected primarily to flexure and transverse shear, whereas the vertical frame clements are generally subjected to axial compression, often coupled with flexure and shear. The floor also serves as a horizontal diaphragm. connecting together and stiffening the various vertical frame elements, Under the action of lateral loads, the floor diaphragms behave rigidly (owing to its high in plane flexural stiffness) and effectively distribute the lateral load to the various vertical frame clements and shear walls. In cast in situ reinforced conerete construction the floor system usually consists of one of the following Wall Supported slab systems PRES 1INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ‘Beam Supported Slab System ‘Two way ribbed (waffle) slab system Flat Slab Systems RC slabs with long spans extended over several bays and only supported by columns, without beams known as flat slab. Flat slab system is very simple to construct and is efficient in that it requires the ‘minimum building height for a given number of stories, Such structure contains large bending ‘moment and vertical forces occur in a zone of supports. This gives a very efficient structure whi ‘minimizes material usages and decreases the economic span range when compared to reinforced conerete. Post-ensioning improves the structural ‘behaviour of flat stab structure considerably. This is more acceptable concept to many designers. It is adopted in some office buildings. Drop Panels: The ‘drop pane! is formed by the local thickening of the slab in the neighbourhood of the PRES supporting column. Drop panels or simply drops are provided mainly for the purpose of reducing shear stress around the column supports. Column Capital: The column capital or column head provided at the top of a column is imtended primarily to increase the capacity of the slab to resist punching shear. The flaring of the column at top is generally done such thatthe plan geometry at the column head is similar to that ofthe column, Drop panel and column capital ‘Types of FLAT SLAB: 1 FLAT PLATE 2. FLAT PLATE WITH COLUMN HEAD OR CAPITAL, edge colt capital mcemst edge ‘column colamaINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL 3. FLAT PLATE WITH DROP i = j | SZ drop panel | / dt on! =. 4. FLAT PLATE WITH DROP AND COLUMN, HEAD ILLITERATURE REVIEW R. P. Apostolska! , G. S. Necevska-Cvetanovska’ , 4. P.Cvetanoyska’ and N. Mirci': Flat-slab building structures possesses major advantages over traditional slab-beam-column structures because of the free design of space, shorter construction time, architectural functional and. economical aspects. Because of the absence of deep beams and shear walls, Mat-slab structural system is significantly more flexible for lateral toads_then traditional RC frame system and that make the system more vulnerable under seismic events. The results from the analysis for few types of construction systems which is presented in the paper show that flat slab system with certain modifications (design of beam in the perimeter of the building and/or RC walls) can achieve rational factor of behaviour considering ECS and can be consider as a system with acceptable seismic risk. Modifications with additional construction elements improve small bearing capacity of the system and merease strength and stiffness, improving seismic behaviour of flat- slab construction system. Selected result from the analysis is presented inthe paper. Mohd. Rizwan Bhina', Waseem Khan’, and D.K.Paul Flat-Slab building is very popular from the aesthetic and architectural. point of view. From fimetional aspect a Matslab building is more efficient than a RC. frame building. So, construction of Flat-Slab building is increasing also in high seismic zone.. In this paper the response of Flat-Slab building and a normal symmetric R.C. frame building of same dimension have been studied for varying. seismic intensities and serviceability. Static, Response Spectrum, have been performed to assess the performance of buildings. The costs of construction for these two buildings have also been compared, An extensive study of serviceability has aso discussed in the paper. The paper also comments on the cost of the ‘at slab building and conventional building and there serviceability. Papers also conclude that which building is more serviceable during earthquake. S.D.Bothara et.al ‘Studies about comparative effect of earthquake on flat slab & Grid floor system consisting of beam PRES 195,eS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL spaced at regular intervals in perpendicular directions, monolithic with slab, V.K. Rahmant et.al work on design of R.C.C. as well as pre-stressed concrete flat slabs for various spans and then compare the results. Programming in MS EXCEL is done to design both types of flat slabs. The idea is to reach a definite conclusion regarding the superiority of the two techniques over one ‘another, Results reveal that a RLC.C. flat slab is cheaper than prestressed concrete flat slab for smaller spans but vice versa is te for larger span. II PROPORTIONING OF FLAT SLAB: IS 456-2000 [Clause 31.2] gives the following {guidelines for proportioning. Drops The drops when provided shall be rectangular in plan, and have a fength in each direction not less than one third of the panel in that direction, For exterior panels, the width of drops at right angles to the non-continuous edge and measured from the centre-line ofthe columns shall be equal to one half of the width of drop for interior panels. COLUMN HRANS Where column heads are provided, that Portion of the column head which lies within the largest right circular cone or pyramid entirely within the outlines ofthe column and the column head, shall be considered for design purpose as shown in Figs. 3.2 and. Thickness of flat slab From the consideration of deflection control IS 456-2000 specifies minimum thickness in terms of span to effective depth ratio, For this purpose larger span is to be considered. If drap as specified in 3.2.1 is provided, then the maximum value of ratio of larger span to thickness shall be 10, if mild steel is used 2, if Fe 415 or Fe 500 steel is used If drops are not provided or sire of drops do not satisfy the specification 3.2.1, then the ratio shall not exceed 0.9 times the value specified above ie, 0X09 = 36, if mild steel is used. 2X09 = 28.8, if TYSD bars are used Wis also specified that in no ease, the thickness of flat slab shall be less than 125 mm, INTRODUCTION TO SOFTWARES ETABS: ‘The innovative and revolutionary new ETABS is the ultimate integrated software package for the structural amalysis amd design oF buildings. Incorporating 40 years of continuous research and, development, this latest ETABS offers unmatched 3D object based modeling and visualization tools, Dluzingly fast tinea and non sophisticated and comprehensive design capabilities for a wide-range of materials, and insightful graphic displays, reports, and schematic drawings that allow users to quickly and easily decipher and understand analysis and design results. sar amatyutcal power, SAFI SAFE is the ultimate tool for designing concrete floor and foundation systems. From framing layout all the way through to detail drawing PRES 496eS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL production, SAFE integrates every aspect of the DESIGN OUT PUT: engineering design process in one easy and intuitive PUNCHING SHEAR: environment, SAFE provides unmatched benefits 10 the engineer with its truly unique combination of power, comprehensive capabilities, and ease-of-use. IV MODEL IN ETABS AND SAFE: ETABS: Punching shear: Max of 0.9885 which i less than I safe BENDING MOMENT IN THE STRIPS AREA OF STEEL ALONG THE STRIPS Y- AXIS 7eS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL. CELLAR PLAN: AREA OF STEEL ALONG THE STRIP X-AXIS V DRAWINGS: FOUNDATION DETAILS: PRES 198eS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FLOOR PLAN: VIRESULTS: = STRIP FORCES 9 ue en ea fi Aa a Hak FOUNDATION REACTIONS DESIGN OF FOUNDATION: UT = JW: 2 8 2 3phe PRES 199INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL DISPLACEMENT: wea BEAM DESIGN: DESIGNED FOR CRITICAL. LOAD ONLY BEAM 40 sy ban ™ 3339393333939 3339293993 a EEEEES EEEESERERSERERELEREES EEEEERERESERE8 lt tee 57 375 sa sas sas 49 a0 495 ss sa 4 se se se se se aa 28 98 ae 22 a 20 ow on 185 um 9 an ms aa ast a0 am as as um a8 1m om ust an oa ua us| co on | us ust oon on 0 COLUMN DESIGN: CONCLUSIONS. 1. Flatslab building structures possesses major advantages over traditional slab-beam-column structures because of the free design of space, shorter constriction time, architectural —fimetionsil and economical aspects, 2. Because of the absence of deep beams and shear walls, flat-slab structural system is significantly more Alexible for lateral loads then traditional RC frame system and that make the system more vulnerable under seismic events. 3. The purely flat-slab RC structural system is considerably more flexible for horizontal loads than the traditional RC frame structures which contributes to the increase ofits vulnerability to seismic effects. 4, The critical moment in design of these systems is the slab-column connection, ie. the penetration force in the slab at the connection, which should retain its bearing capacity even at maximal displacements LS PRESeS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL. 5. The ductility of these structural systems is generally limited by the deformability capacity of the column-slab connection, 6. To increase the bearing capacity of the flatslab structure under horizontal loads, particularly when speaking about seismically prone areas and limitation of deformations, modifications of the eystem by. ‘adding structural elements are necessary REFERENCE: LL] ISSN 2521-6905 (Paper) SEAL, Vol 4, Issue 2 2016 “Analysis and Design of Flat Slabusing Etabs Software” by B. Anjaneyulu etal [2] Sunayana Varma , B, Venugopal, K. Karthikeyan Intemational Joumal of Civil Engineering and Teclmology (UCIET), ISSN 2321 -919X(Online), Volume 2, Issue 8, August (2014) [3] Mahdi hosseini , Ahmed najim Abdullah alaskari,Prof.N.V.RamanaRao, Intemational Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 -6916(Online), Volume 5, Issue 8, August (2014). [4] CSI. (2011), extended 3D analysis of building structures (ETABS), Computers and Structures Ine. USA [5] IS: 1893 (Part 1), 2002), Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Dethi. [6] IS: 456:2000, Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Dethi. [7] The other code books referred for this project are, ‘SP 16 (design aids for 1S 456), 1S 875 — Part I, II, II, V. [8] Mahdi hosseini , Ahmed najim Abdullah alaskari,ProfN.V-RamanaRao, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IICIET), ISSN 0976 ~6316(Online). Volume 5. Issue 8. August (2014). 201