VISAYAS STATE UNIVERSITY
Department of Pure and Applied Physics
0
Chem 120.1: Organic Chemistry
R097 | 10:00 am - 1:00 pm
LABORATORY SCIENTIFIC REPORT
on
Hydrocarbons
Name: Adrianne Marie B. Labaclado
Christal Grace O. Repollo
Student ID #: 24-1-01847
24-1-00264
Course and Year: BSA-1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Nature and Importance
Hydrocarbons are the primary type of organic molecules. According to the name
itself, hydrocarbons are composed of two elements, namely hydrogen and carbon. In
most cases, hydrocarbons are structured with one or more carbon atoms forming a
central structure surrounded by hydrogen atoms (Donev et al. 2018, as cited in Alvarez,
2021). Hydrocarbons are categorized into four classifications: alkanes, alkenes,
alkynes, and aromatic hydrocarbons or also known as arenes. Furthermore,
hydrocarbons may be classified as either saturated or unsaturated.
Each classification of hydrocarbons possesses unique characteristics and plays
a significant role in various scientific and industrial applications. They are the principal
constituents of petroleum and natural gas. They serve as fuels and lubricants as well as
raw materials for the production of plastics, fibers, rubbers, solvents, explosives, and
industrial chemicals (Carey, 2024). This report aims to explain each classification in
detail, elucidating their respective natures and importance within the broader context of
hydrocarbon chemistry and their purpose through this experiment.
Alkanes or in others terms “paraffins” are often described as saturated
hydrocarbons—saturated because they only have C-C and C-H single bonds and thus
2
contain the maximum possible number of hydrogen per carbon. They have the general
formula CnH2n+2, where n is an integer (McMurry, 2011). They exhibit low reactivity
which according to Libretexts (2023) is because of their strong carbon-carbon single
bonds and strong carbon-hydrogen bonds. They are also nonpolar molecules, making
them relatively inert toward polar reagents.
Meanwhile, alkenes and alkynes are unsaturated hydrocarbons since they have
fewer amounts of hydrogen atoms compared to alkanes. Alkenes or olefin has a general
formula CnH2n, which is a chemical compound made of only carbon and hydrogen
atoms containing at least one carbon-to-carbon double bond (McKeen, 2011), meaning
it has both sigma (𝜎) and pi (π) bonds making them more reactive compared to alkane.
Alkynes, on the other hand, are acyclic (either branched or unbranched)
aliphatic hydrocarbons distinguished by the presence of at least one carbon-to-carbon
triple bond, which leads to the general molecular formula CnH2n-n. It is also known as
acetylene, following the established trends, triple bonds are both shorter and stronger
than double bonds; the presence of an additional π bond—resulting in alkynes having
two π bonds—further enhances the reactivity of the triple bond (Stauffer et al., 2008).
Aromatic hydrocarbons, or arenes, are compounds containing benzene rings
with delocalized π-electrons. This contributes to their stability and distinct properties.
They are nonpolar, hydrophobic, and usually insoluble in water but dissolve easily in
organic solvents. Arenes are chemically stable and undergo electrophilic substitution
reactions rather than addition reactions. When burned, they produce sooty flames due
to high carbon content.
3
This experiment involved samples like cyclohexane, cyclohexene, benzene,
toluene, and acetylene which highlights the characteristics of hydrocarbons in their
chemical reactivity. The selected samples represent different types of hydrocarbons—
which exhibit varying chemical behaviors. These differences make them ideal for
studying reactivity trends and their potential applications. By exploring the samples,
the experiment demonstrated how the unique properties of hydrocarbons can be
leveraged for practical uses in energy production, manufacturing, and other industries.
Objectives of the Study
The main objectives of the experiment were the following:
● To differentiate types of hydrocarbons.
● To identify the characteristic chemical tests for each of hydrocarbons.
● To understand the chemical properties and reactivities of hydrocarbons through
experimental observation.
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This chapter introduces the materials and methods that were applied to do this
experiment. The use of laboratory equipment and chemical reagents were
systematically applied to conduct tests such as ignition, Bromine, and Potassium
Permanganate and ammoniacal silver nitrate were applied in an orderly manner during
the experiments . Each procedure was designed to examine and compare the behaviors
of various hydrocarbons.
Materials
In this experiment, the laboratory apparatuses that were used are the following:
crucible cover, crucible tong, medicine dropper, tirrill burner, test tube, test tube rack,
wash botte, carbon paper, separatory funnel, filter flask, rubber tubing, blue litmus
paper, and lastly 5 mL pipet. On the other hand, to perform the experiment, the
chemicals/substances that were needed were: Ammoniacal AgNO3, cyclohexane
(C6H12), cyclohexene (C6H10), acetylene (C2H2), 0.1 M Br2 in CCl4, dilute KmnO4,
calcium carbide (CaC2), benzene (C6H6), and toluene (C6H5CH3).
5
Methods
A. Ignition Test
Each sample was placed in a porcelain crucible, with three (3) drops. The crucible
was then brought to the edge of the burner flame using crucible tongs. Observations
were made regarding the sample's flammability and characteristics, specifically noting
its color and sootiness.
B. Reaction with Bromine
One (1) mL of 0.1M Br2 was placed in CCl4 solution into each of the two (2)
test tubes, ensuring that one (1) tube was wrapped in carbon paper to protect its contents
from light. Then three (3) drops were added of the sample to each test tube, sealed them,
and shook gently to mix the solutions. After approximately ten (10) minutes, any fading
of Br2 was observed in the unwrapped tube and subsequently compared the contents of
both test tubes. Where fading had occurred, the presence of HBr was tested by adding
ten (10) drops of distilled water to the final reaction mixture. The water layer was then
examined using the litmus paper and results were recorded.
C. Reaction with Cold Dilute Permanganate
In a test tube, one (1) mL of dilute KMnO4 was added. Then, five (5) drops of
each sample were added, and the test tube was shaken for 5 minutes to mix the contents.
After this time, the contents of the test tube were examined, and the results were
recorded.
6
D. Reaction with Ammoniacal Silver Nitrate Solution
In the clean test tube, the silver reagent was placed in it with ten (10) drops and
then two (2) drops of each sample was added using the medicine dropper. The contents
of the tube were then mixed thoroughly and observed. Any of the precipitate that was
obtained was transferred in a vessel.
Preparation and Testing of Acetylene Gas
Approximately five (5) grams of calcium carbide lumps were introduced into a
dry two hundred fifty (250) mL distilling flask, and the remainder of the apparatus was
assembled for the generation of acetylene gas. About one hundred (100) mL of water
was added to the dropping funnel, and a few drops of water were allowed to fall onto
the solid. The setup was permitted to stand for a couple of minutes to ensure that the air
was displaced from the apparatus. Additional water was added as necessary, and the
gas evolved during this process was subsequently used for tests B, C, and D as
previously described. The generated gas was bubbled through the contents of the test
tube for a full minute whenever the procedure required the addition of hydrocarbons.
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter discusses the results acquired from the conducted experiments,
emphasizing the changes reactivity and combustion properties among the hydrocarbons
tested. The data obtained from the chemical tests conducted indicated some properties
of the structure members of hydrocarbons which are saturation, unsaturation and
aromatics. The analysis of these results offers insights into the chemical properties and
practical implementation of hydrocarbons.
Table 1. Ignition test
Samples Chemical Description of Observation during
Formula samples ignition test
Cyclohexane C6H12 Yellow flame No soot formation
Cyclohexene C6H10 Luminous yellow Minimal soot formation
flame
Benzene C6H6 Yellow flame Minimal soot formation
Toluene C6H5CH3 Yellow flame More dark soot formation
In this test, only cyclohexane underwent complete combustion, which is why
there was no soot formation when it was ignited. In contrast, the other samples produced
soot. These results are likely due to their carbon-to-hydrogen ratios. Xuan (2020) stated
the lower the carbon-to-hydrogen ratio, the sootier the flame. In this case, which can be
applied to the results collected.
8
Cyclohexane had no soot when burned as it has a carbon-to-hydrogen ratio of
6:12 whereas cyclohexene produced minimal soot due to its slightly lower C:H rate of
6:10 which reduces the hydrogen available for combustion. Benzene also had minimal
soot produced because of their C:H ratio of 12:1, with its aromatic ring structure
contributing to incomplete combustion, but it is also possible that due to experimental
conditions have limited the amount of soot produced. Then again toluene had a darker
soot formation compared to the other samples having a 6:5 carbon-to-hydrogen ratio.
From here, cyclohexane is more stable compared to the other samples.
Table 2. Reaction with bromine in CCl4
Samples Wrapped test Test w/ litmus Unwrapped Test w/ litmus
tube test tube
Cyclohexane No fading Blue to red No fading Blue to red
Cyclohexene Faded Blue to red Faded Blue to red
Benzene No fading Blue to red No fading Blue to red
Toluene No fading Blue to red No fading Blue to red
Acetylene No fading Blue to red No fading Blue to red
This part of this experiment tested the reaction of various hydrocarbons with
bromine in CCl₄ under wrapped and unwrapped conditions, followed by a litmus test.
Cyclohexene was the only sample that caused the bromine solution to fade. This
reaction is an example of electrophilic reaction. Bromine is a polarizable molecule, and
the approaching pi bond in cyclohexene polarizes the bromine, forming 1,2-
Dibromocyclohexane. (Libretexts, 2023)
9
Figure 1. Chemical formula of cyclohexene in Br2 in CCl4 (Matthew, 2011)
Cyclohexane, as a saturated alkane, and benzene and toluene, as aromatic
compounds, resisted bromine addition, with benzene and toluene requiring specific
conditions (e.g., catalysts) for such reactions. According to Matthew (2011) for
cyclohexane or saturated hydrocarbons to react with bromine you have to add UV light.
So simply adding some bromine to cyclohexane won’t cause a reaction to occur.
Figure 2. Chemical reaction of cyclohexane with Br2 (Codis, 2019)
Acetylene, despite being an alkyne, did not react under these conditions,
possibly due to insufficient reactivity. The litmus test consistently turned red across all
samples, reflecting the acidic nature of the bromine-containing medium. This highlights
bromine's effectiveness in distinguishing between saturated, unsaturated, and aromatic
hydrocarbons.
Table 3. Reaction with potassium permanganate
Samples Observation
Cyclohexane No changes
Cyclohexene Formed a dark brown suspension
Benzene No changes
Toluene No changes
Acetylene Formed a brown suspension
Potassium permanganate is an oxidizing agent that reacts with unsaturated
aliphatic hydrocarbons, but does not react with alkanes or aromatic hydrocarbons. The
10
dilute KMnO4 solution has a deep purple color, if there is no reaction you should see
no color change (Cundiff, 2016). This was evident with the result of cyclohexene, an
alkane, and benzene and toluene being aromatic hydrocarbons showed no reactions
when mixed with potassium permanganate. However, when it reacts with unsaturated
aliphatics it produces MnO2, a brown precipitate. This is why acetylene, a usaturated
hydrocarbon, also showed a reaction, which formed a brown precipitate. Because of its
unsaturation, specifically its triple bond. This reaction is useful as a test for the presence
of a multiple bond, if there is no other easily oxidizable group, such as an alcohol or
aldehyde.
Figure 3. Chemical reaction of cyclohexene with KMnO4 (Codis, 2019)
Figure 4. Chemical reaction of acetylene with KMnO4 (Codis, 2019)
Table 4. Reaction with ammoniacal AgNO3
Samples Observation
Cyclohexane Colorless with small gray precipitate
Cyclohexene Colorless, formed two layers with small gray precipitate
Benzene Colorless, with small precipitation
Toluene Colorless
Acetylene Formed white precipitate
11
According to Camarote (2015) this test is to determine the presence of a triple
bond, which in this case was shown upon the observations in Acetylene reaction with
AgNO3 , producing silver acetylide, a white precipitate. This means the other samples
have no presence of a triple bond.
Figure 5. Chemical formula of acetylene reacting with ammoniacal AgNO3 (Codis,
2019)
In contrast, the other samples—benzene, toluene, cyclohexane, and
cyclohexene—had minor side reactions or did not react because they lack terminal
triple bonds. Benzene and toluene are aromatic compounds with stable resonance
structures that resist such reactions, cyclohexane is a saturated hydrocarbon without
unsaturation, and cyclohexene, though unsaturated, has a double bond rather than a
terminal triple bond, making it unreactive in this test.
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSION
The experiment successfully classified the hydrocarbons—cyclohexane, cyclohexene,
benzene, toluene, and acetylene—through a series of chemical tests that yielded
valuable insights into their structures and reactivity. Each test confirmed the presence
or absence of specific functional groups, facilitating the accurate differentiation among
alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, and aromatic compounds. In the ignition test, cyclohexane
burned cleanly, whereas cyclohexene, benzene, and toluene produced sooty flames,
indicating the presence of unsaturation or aromaticity. The bromine test in CCl₄
revealed that cyclohexene decolorized the solution, confirming its double bond, while
cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, and acetylene showed no reaction. The potassium
permanganate test further supported this, with a brown suspension observed in
acetylene and cyclohexene reacting with a much darker suspension while the other
hydrocarbons remained unchanged. The ammoniacal silver nitrate test reacted
exclusively with acetylene, indicating the presence of a triple bond. The significance of
these tests lies in their ability to illuminate key characteristics such as saturation,
unsaturation, bond types, and aromaticity, all of which are essential for understanding
the behavior and potential applications of these compounds. Overall, the tests produced
reliable results that not only classified the hydrocarbons but also highlighted the
13
importance of chemical reactivity in identifying and distinguishing various types of
hydrocarbons.
LITERATURE CITED
Alvarez, A. N. T. (2021). Reaction of Hydrocarbons. In Department of Biochemistry,
College of Humanities and Sciences, De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences
Institute, City of Dasmariňas, Cavite [Journal-article].
[Link]
Camarote, B. K. (2015). Hydrocarbons. [Link]. Retrieved from
[Link]
Carey, F. A. (2024, November 21). Hydrocarbon | Definition, Types, & Facts.
Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from
[Link]
Codis, E. (2019). Lab rep [Link]. Scribd. Retrieved
from [Link]
docx?fbclid=IwY2xjawGyPSFleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHYddZ9yVIf0ZtFoHR
ohdjCwS9wYbHsJuEeg624IoQiIi8_EJo613fCpkYg_aem_xJgkoKUVaarwBcz
0IzHKlA
Cundiff, A. (2016). Hydrocarbons Background. [Link]. Retrieved from
[Link]
Libretexts. (2023). Reactivity of alkanes. Chemistry LibreTexts. Retrieved from
[Link]
odules_(Organic_Chemistry)/Alkanes/Reactivity_of_Alkanes#:~:text=The%2
0alkanes%20and%20cycloalkanes%2C%20with,and%20strong%20carbon%2
Dhydrogen%20bonds.
Libretexts. (2023). Reactions of Alkenes with Bromine. Chemistry LibreTexts.
Retrieved from
[Link]
odules_(Organic_Chemistry)/Reactions/Addition_Reactions/Electrophilic_Ad
dition_Reactions/Reactions_of_Alkenes_with_Bromine
Matthew. (2011). Properties of hydrocarbons | MendelSet. Retrieved from
[Link]
McKeen, L. W. (2011). Polyolefins, polyvinyls, and acrylics. In Elsevier eBooks (pp.
145–193). [Link]
15
McMurry, J. E. (2007). Organic chemistry: with biological applications. Retrieved
from [Link]
Stauffer, E., Dolan, J. A., & Newman, R. (2008). Review of basic organic chemistry.
In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 49–83). [Link]
1.50007-5
Xuan, L. (2020). Chemistry Report [Link]. Scribd. Retrieved from
[Link]