0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views3 pages

Homo Sapiens vs Neanderthals: Survival Factors

The document discusses the survival of Homo sapiens over other hominid species, including Neanderthals and Denisovans, highlighting factors such as advanced hunting technology, social behavior, and language development. It details how climate changes and competition for resources contributed to the extinction of Neanderthals around 30,000 years ago. The analysis of archaeological findings, including tools and skeletal remains, reveals the advantages that Homo sapiens had in terms of adaptability and innovation.

Uploaded by

micsan0728
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views3 pages

Homo Sapiens vs Neanderthals: Survival Factors

The document discusses the survival of Homo sapiens over other hominid species, including Neanderthals and Denisovans, highlighting factors such as advanced hunting technology, social behavior, and language development. It details how climate changes and competition for resources contributed to the extinction of Neanderthals around 30,000 years ago. The analysis of archaeological findings, including tools and skeletal remains, reveals the advantages that Homo sapiens had in terms of adaptability and innovation.

Uploaded by

micsan0728
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

2.

17 讲义
Some 50,000 years ago, Homo sapiens beat other hominids to become the only
surviving species. Kate Ravilious reveals how we did it.

A: Today, there are over seven billion people living on Earth. No other species has
exerted as much influence over the planet as us, But turn the clock back 80,000 years
and we were one of a number of species roaming the Earth. Our own species, Homo
sapiens (Latin for ‘wise man’], was most successful in Africa. In western Eurasia, the
Neanderthals dominated, while Homo erectus may have lived in Indonesia.
Meanwhile, an unusual finger bone and tooth, discovered in Denisova cave in Siberia
in 2008, have led scientists to believe that yet another human population -the
Denisovans — may also have been widespread across Asia. Somewhere along the
line, these other human species died out, leaving Homo sapiens as the sole survivor.
So what made us the winners in the battle for survival?

B: Some 74,000 years ago, the Toba ‘supervolcano’ on the Indonesian island of
Sumatra erupted. The scale of the event was so great that ash from the eruption was
flung as far as eastern India, more than 2,000 kilometres away. Oxford archaeologist
Mike Petraglia and his team have uncovered thousands of stone tools buried
underneath the Taba ash. The mix of hand axes and smear tips have led Petraglia to
speculate that Homo sapiens and Homo erectus were both living in eastern India prior
to the Toba eruption. Based on careful examination of the tools and dating of the
sediment layers where they were found, Petraglia and his team suggest that Homo
sapiens arrived in eastern India around 78,000 years ago, migrating out of Africa and
across Arabia during a favourable climate period. After their arrival, the simple tools
belonging to Homo erectus seemed to lessen in number and eventually disappear
completely. ‘We think that Homo sapiens hada more efficient hunting technology,
which could have given them the edge,’ says Petraglia, ‘Whether the eruption of Toba
also played a role in the extinction of the Homo erectus-like species is unclear to us.’

C: Some 45,000 years later, another fight for survival took place. This time, the
location was Europe and the protagonists were another species, the Neanderthals.
They were a highly successful species that dominated the European landscape for
300,000 years. Yet within just a few thousand years of the arrival of Homo sapiens,
their numbers plummeted, They eventually disappeared from the landscape around
30,000 years ago, with their last known refuge being southern Iberia, including
Gibraltar. Initially, Homo sapiens and Neanderthals lived alongside each other and
had no reason to compete. But then Europe’s climate swung into a cold, inhospitable,
dry phase. ‘Neanderthal and Homo sapiens populations had to retreat to refuge
(pockets of habitable land). This heightened competition between the two groups,’
explains Chris Stringer, anthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London.
D: Both species were strong and stockier than the average human today, but
Neanderthals were particularly robust. ‘Their skeletons show that they had broad
shoulders and thick necks,’ says Stringer. ‘Homo sapiens, on the other hand, had
longer forearms, which undoubtedly enabled them to throw a spear from some
distance, with less danger and using relatively little energy,’ explains Stringer. This
long-range ability may have given Homo sapiens an advantage in hunting. When it
came to keeping warm, Homo sapiens had another skill: weaving and sewing.
Archaeologists have uncovered simple needles fashioned from ivory and bone
alongside Homo sapiens, dating as far back as 35,000 years ago. ‘Using this
technology, we could use animal skins to make ourselves tents, warm clothes and fur
boots,’ says Stringer. In contrast, Neanderthals never seemed to master sewing skills,
instead relying on pinning skins together with thorns.

E: A thirst for exploration provided Homo sapiens with another significant advantage
over Neanderthals. Objects such as shell beads and flint tools, discovered many miles
from their source, show that our ancestors travelled over large distances, in order to
barter and exchange useful materials, and share ideas and knowledge. By contrast,
Neanderthals tended to keep themselves to themselves, living in small groups. They
misdirected their energies by only gathering resources from their immediate
surroundings and perhaps failing to discover new technologies outside their territory.

F: Some of these differences in behaviour may have emerged because the two species
thought in different ways. By comparing skull shapes, archaeologists have shown that
Homo sapiens had a more developed temporal lobe — the regions at the side of the
brain, associated with listening, language and long-term memory. ‘We think that
Homo sapiens had a significantly more complex language than Neanderthals and were
able to comprehend and discuss concepts such as the distant past and future,’ says
Stringer. Penny Spikins, an archaeologist at the University of York, has recently
suggested that Homo sapiens may also have had a greater diversity of brain types than
Neanderthals. ‘Our research indicates that high-precision tools, new hunting
technologies and the development of symbolic communication may all have come
about because they were willing to include people with “different” minds and
specialised roles in their society,’ she explains. ‘We see similar kinds of injuries on
male and female Neanderthal skeletons, implying there was no such division of
labour, says Spikins.

G: Thus by around 30,000 years ago, many talents and traits were well established in
Homo sapiens societies but still absent from Neanderthal communities. Stringer
thinks that the Neanderthals were just living in the wrong place at the wrong time.
‘They had to compete with Homo sapiens during a phase of very unstable climate
across Europe. During each rapid climate fluctuation, they may have suffered greater
losses of people than Homo sapiens, and thus were slowly worn down,’ he says. ‘If
the climate had remained stable throughout, they might still be here
Complete the sentences below. Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS
from the passage for each answer.

6 Analysis of stone tools and has enabled Petraglia's team to put forward an
arrival date for Homo sapiens in eastern India.
7 Homo sapiens used both to make sewing implements.
8 The territorial nature of Neanderthals may have limited their ability to acquire
resources and
9. Archaeologists examined in order to get an insight into Neanderthal and
Homo sapiens' capacity for language and thought.

You might also like