CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
The comparison of sustainable design and development practices between
public and private housing projects has gained significant attention in recent years,
particularly in the context of addressing the growing challenges of urbanization and
climate change.
This literature review aims to explore the existing body of research that explains
the differences and similarities in sustainable practices employed within public and
private housing sectors. By synthesizing previous studies, this review not only focus on
the theoretical underpinnings of sustainable housing developments but also emphasizes
the practical implications that these differing approaches entail for effective urban
planning and community resilience.
Sustainable Design and Development
Sustainable design and development focus on creating environments that
minimize negative impacts on the natural environment while maximizing social and
economic benefits. This approach is increasingly recognized as essential in both public
and private housing projects. Sustainable design principles include optimizing site
potential, minimizing energy consumption and waste, using environmentally preferable
products, conserving water, and improving indoor air quality. These principles not only
address ecological concerns but also enhance the overall quality of life for residents
through healthier living conditions. The projects adhering to sustainable design often
integrate green spaces, promote energy efficiency, and prioritize materials with low
environmental impact, thereby fostering sustainable communities that are adaptable to
changing needs and climate conditions (Gasparini, 2023).
Public housing initiatives have increasingly adopted sustainable design as a
framework to enhance the livability and resilience of communities. The emphasis on
sustainable practices has shown to significantly reduce operational costs over time,
contributing to long-term affordability. In contrast, private housing developments often
leverage sustainable design to differentiate themselves in a competitive market,
promoting eco-friendly features as key selling points. Nevertheless, both sectors share
a common goal: to create housing solutions that are not only resource-efficient but also
economically viable and socially responsible, addressing the pressing issues of
urbanization, resource depletion, and climate change. This alignment of environmental
and economic goals exemplifies the critical role of sustainable design in shaping the
future of housing.
Sustainable Housing Projects
Various studies have explored the critical role of sustainable housing in mitigating
environmental impacts and fostering social equity. Sustainable housing projects are
designed to minimize resource consumption and environmental footprint while
promoting social inclusivity and affordability (Biro, 2023). This is particularly relevant for
public housing, which often aims to serve marginalized communities and provide
affordable accommodation options. The integration of sustainability principles into
private housing projects, on the other hand, frequently focuses on maximizing energy
efficiency and reducing operational costs, aligning with market-driven approaches
(Moore & Doyon, 2023).
One of the factors in the distinction between public and private housing projects
is the influence of regulatory frameworks and funding mechanisms. Public housing
projects are usually subject to more stringent governmental regulations and funding
constraints, which can impact their design and sustainable practices. In contrast, private
developers may enjoy greater flexibility and innovation in implementing sustainable
design strategies, driven by competitive market advantages. However, this flexibility can
also lead to instances of gentrification, where rising property values may displace
existing low-income residents (Biro, 2023).
Additionally, the use of renewable materials and technologies is another area of
divergence in the sustainability approaches of public and private housing projects.
Research indicates that while public projects often adopt a holistic approach that
considers long-term sustainability impacts, private projects sometimes favor short-term
cost benefits, leading to a lower overall sustainability score (Fell & Mattsson, 2021). The
challenge lies in balancing environmental, social, and economic sustainability, which
remains a critical objective for both sectors to achieve sustainable urban development
(Robles, Pico & Hosseini, 2022).
The landscape of sustainable design and development in public and private
housing projects is intricate and multifaceted. A comprehensive understanding of the
similarities and differences can inform policymakers, practitioners, and scholars in
crafting strategies that address the pressing issues of housing sustainability while
fostering equitable urban environments.
Foreign Studies
Housing Projects in Abu Dhabi, UAE
A study assessed the sustainability and satisfaction levels within public housing
projects in Abu Dhabi, UAE. It examined the architectural and social aspects of housing
units, urban design, and their contributions to residents' quality of life through the
Estidama rating system. The study outlined how government-led initiatives strive to
create environmentally friendly and socially cohesive communities, highlighting the
integration of local materials and energy-efficient designs to enhance sustainability
(Ibrahim, 2020).
Further investigations have shown that public housing policies are increasingly
aligned with sustainable practices, targeting energy efficiency, waste reduction, and
community engagement. These initiatives often focus on retrofitting existing structures
and constructing new homes that adhere to rigorous sustainability criteria, emphasizing
long-term benefits over short-term costs.
Public Housing Projects in New York City
A study evaluated the implementation of the LEED (Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design) framework within public housing projects in New York City,
demonstrating significant reductions in energy consumption and improvements in indoor
air quality (Roberts & Todd, 2009). This research highlighted how adherence to
standardized sustainability certifications can optimize building performance while
fostering healthier living environments for residents.
Sustainable Building Practices in Denmark and Austria
In countries like Denmark and Austria, comprehensive policies promote
sustainable building practices that emphasize community participation, eco-friendly
materials, and effective waste management systems. These studies reveal that
integrating sustainability into planning processes can significantly enhance the
environmental performance of housing projects. Denmark’s Friland community
exemplifies how residents actively participate in building their homes with sustainable
materials, leading to a collective commitment to maintain environmental stewardship
and reduce carbon footprints (Hayward, 2024).
Local Studies
Sustainable Design Principles in Philippine Housing
Sustainable design principles are increasingly recognized as essential in
addressing the environmental challenges facing the Philippines. A significant study
highlights that the Philippine National Climate Action Plan identifies green building as
pivotal in developing housing that adapts to climate change (Oomen, [Link]., 2023). This
framework emphasizes the integration of environmentally friendly materials, energy
efficiency, and waste management practices in both public and private housing sectors,
forming a basis for comparative studies.
Public and Private Housing
Research indicates a disparity in the approach to sustainable design between
public and private housing projects. Public housing initiatives often face limitations due
to budget constraints and regulatory hurdles, which can impede the adoption of
advanced sustainable technologies (Salzer, [Link]., 2017). In contrast, private housing
developers are increasingly integrating innovative green technologies, driven by
consumer demand for eco-friendly homes and potential cost savings over time. Studies
demonstrate that private projects tend to implement comprehensive sustainability
measures more effectively than public counterparts, which frequently focus on basic
compliance with regulations.
Green Building Code in the Philippines
The introduction of the Green Building Code in the Philippines serves as a critical
development aimed at promoting sustainability across housing projects. This code
establishes standards that affect both public and private housing developments, though
studies reveal that compliance levels vary widely (Evangelista, n.d). A study
documented that while many private developers actively pursue LEED or BERDE
certifications, public projects often lag behind due to bureaucratic processes and limited
resources. The effectiveness of these regulations can significantly influence project
outcomes in terms of sustainability and environmental performance, suggesting a need
for more streamlined processes to enhance public sector participation.