Scribd
Upload
54 views3 pages

Simple Memorial Format

The document outlines the internal moot court competition case between Mum Legal Aid Centre and the Attorney General in the Republic of Uwezo. It details the jurisdiction, admissibility, issues presented, and arguments for both the applicant and respondent regarding alleged human rights violations. The document concludes with a section for stating the reliefs sought under each issue.

Uploaded by

Jemedali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
54 views3 pages

Simple Memorial Format

The document outlines the internal moot court competition case between Mum Legal Aid Centre and the Attorney General in the Republic of Uwezo. It details the jurisdiction, admissibility, issues presented, and arguments for both the applicant and respondent regarding alleged human rights violations. The document concludes with a section for stating the reliefs sought under each issue.

Uploaded by

Jemedali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MUMLSA TEAM X

MUSLIM UNIVERSITY OF MOROGORO LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION

INTERNAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UWEZO

SITTING IN HAKIZETU

IN THE CASE BETWEEN

MUM LEGAL AID CENTRE……………………… [APPLICANT]

AND

ATTORNEY GENERAL………………………… [RESPONDENT]

IN THE REPUBLIC OF UWEZO

2022

MEMORIAL FOR THE APPLICANT OR RESPONDENT


1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Remember to use proper paragraphing, sub-paragraphing and numbering of points in


all parts of your presentation.

[1 PAGE]

2.0 STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY

For the applicants Memorial write the below;

a) That the matter is admissible before the court and that the court has jurisdiction to hear
and determine the matter

For the respondent Memorial write the below;

a) That the matter is not admissible before the court alternatively that the court is ousted
of its jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter

[1 PAGE]

3.0 ISSUES PRESENTED


a) Whether UWEZO has violated the right to freedom from denial of liberty of JEILEDI and
MATRA
b) Whether UWEZO has violated relevant human rights treaties by failing to protect the rights
of JEILEDI and MATRA;
c) Whether Sections 10 and 11 of the Criminal Procedure Code are unconstitutional and in
contravention of the human rights treaties that UWEZO has ratified.

4.0 ARGUMENTS ADVANCED [7 PAGES]

For the applicants Memorial write the below;

1. That UWEZO has violated the right to freedom from denial of liberty of JEILEDI and
MATRA;
2. That UWEZO has violated relevant human rights treaties by failing to protect the rights
of JEILEDI and MATRA;
3. That Sections 10 and 11 of the Criminal Procedure Code are unconstitutional and in
contravention of the human rights treaties that UWEZO has ratified.

For the respondent Memorial write the below;

1. That UWEZO did not violate the right to freedom from denial of liberty of JEILEDI
and MATRA;
2. That UWEZO did not violate relevant human rights treaties and didn’t fail to protect
the rights of JEILEDI and MATRA;
3. That Sections 10 and 11 of the Criminal Procedure Code are not unconstitutional
and in contravention of the human rights treaties that UWEZO has ratified.

5.0 PRAYER OF RELIEF

State the Reliefs Sought Under Each Issue

[1 PAGE]

You might also like