By

1
2.1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 14
2.2. A Brief Summary ................................................................................... 19
2.3. Project Listing and Description ................................................................ 25
2.3.1. Insectology ........................................................................................ 25
2.3.2. Project Bellwether ............................................................................... 26
2.3.3. Operation Magic Sword ........................................................................ 27
2.3.5. Insect Allies ....................................................................................... 29
2.3.6. Operation May Day ............................................................................. 30
2.3.7. Operation Drop Kick ............................................................................ 31
2.3.8. Operation Big Buzz ............................................................................. 32
2.3.9. Operation Big Itch............................................................................... 33
2.3.10. Operation LAC .................................................................................. 34
2.3.11. Operation Top Hat ............................................................................. 34
2.3.12. Project 112 ...................................................................................... 35
2.4. Other Biological Tests............................................................................. 36
2.4.2. Operation Sea-Spray ........................................................................... 37
2.4.3. Operation Big City (Also Operation Open Air) ......................................... 37
2.4.4. Operation Dark Winter ......................................................................... 37
2.4.5. Operation Whitecoat ........................................................................... 38
2.5. Some Notable Experiments ..................................................................... 39
NOTES ........................................................................................................ 42

3.1. Identifying Biological Warfare Attacks ...................................................... 51

3.3. Suspicious Outbreaks ............................................................................. 57
3.3.1. Hantavirus ......................................................................................... 57
3.3.2. Lyme Disease ..................................................................................... 59
3.3.3. Mycoplasma – The Gulf War Syndrome .................................................. 63
3.3.4. The West Nile Virus ............................................................................. 66
3.3.5. Vaping............................................................................................... 69
3.3.6. Virginia Nursing home infections ........................................................... 72
3.3.7. The Pandemic That Never Was: The 2009 Swine Flu Outbreak .................. 73

2
 3.3.7.1. The Source and Origin – Official Story ................................................ 74
3.3.7.2. A Media Extravaganza in Support of the Official Story ........................... 76
3.3.7.3. The Actual Results............................................................................ 78
3.3.7.4. Possible or Probable Origin ................................................................ 78
3.3.7.5. Criticisms of Officials and the Official Story.......................................... 79
NOTES ........................................................................................................ 81
4. Chapter 4 – US Foreign Deployment ........................................................ 87
4. 1. Secrecy of Operation ............................................................................. 89
4.2. US Bio-Chemical Warfare – Foreign Applications ........................................ 89
4.3. The Korean War .................................................................................... 91
4.4. US Biowarfare on Cuba and The Americas................................................100
4.5. Vietnam and Agent Orange ....................................................................103
4.6. Georgian Swine Flu in Russia and China ..................................................106
4.7. Bat-Borne Diseases in Asia ....................................................................107
4.8. Gruinard Island – Scotland ....................................................................108
4.9. The Secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit ..............................................................109
4.10. Operation Third Chance .......................................................................110
4.10.1. Operation Derby Hat (Biological experiments in China and Asia) ............111
4.10.2. Okinawa .........................................................................................112
4.10.3 Afghanistan ......................................................................................113
4.11. Ethnic-specific bioweapons ...................................................................114
4.12. More Secret US Government Projects ....................................................115
NOTES .......................................................................................................117

5.1. Introduction .........................................................................................122

5.2. And Polio, Too . . . ................................................................................130
5.3. And Meningitis . . . ...............................................................................134
5.4. And EBOLA . . . ....................................................................................136
5.5. A Chinese “Experiment”? .......................................................................139
5.6. Back to Depopulation ............................................................................140
5.7. A Successful Genocide ...........................................................................141
5.8. And Yet More . . . .................................................................................142
5.9. Epilogue ..............................................................................................144
NOTES .......................................................................................................147

3
The WHO, Pfizer, and Nigerian Meningitis .......................................................150
NOTES .......................................................................................................158

7.1. The Official Story – Pathogen Spread by Wild Birds ...................................160

7.2. Then: The Disclaimers ...........................................................................162
7.3. All We Need to do is Think ....................................................................163
7.4. Epilogue ..............................................................................................166
NOTES .......................................................................................................169

NOTES .......................................................................................................181
8.3. Evaluation and Conclusions ....................................................................185

NOTES .......................................................................................................198

10.1. China’s 6 Bio-attacks ...........................................................................200

10.2. China’s Bird Flu Outbreaks ...................................................................201
10.3. China’s “Pork Speculators” ...................................................................202
10. 4. China-Targeted Bio-Weapons ..............................................................204
10.5. China COVID-19 .................................................................................206
10.6. Beijing COVID-19 ...............................................................................207
10.7. China’s Second COVID Attack 2022 .......................................................209
10.8. Hong Kong COVID-19 ..........................................................................211
10.9. SARS, MERS, ZIKA, EBOLA .................................................................213
10.9.1. Let’s Look at SARS ...........................................................................214
10.9.2. Let’s Look at MERS ...........................................................................215
10.9. 3. Let’s Look at ZIKA ...........................................................................216
10.9.4. Let’s Look at EBOLA .........................................................................218
NOTES .......................................................................................................221

11.1. Some Background ...............................................................................229

11.2. Fredrick Cancer Research Center – CIA, NIH, CDC ..................................232
11.3. Dr. Robert Strecker .............................................................................235
11.4. Dr. Leonard Horowitz ..........................................................................236
11.5. Dr. Horowitz on Professor Jakob Segal ...................................................237
11.6. Dr. Boyd Graves .................................................................................239
11.8. The WHO ...........................................................................................242
4
11.9. The WHO Vaccination Programs ............................................................244
11.10. Spread of AIDS in the US ...................................................................246
11.10 . Epilogue..........................................................................................252
NOTES .......................................................................................................254

Notes ........................................................................................................274

Notes ........................................................................................................284

Ebola Origin ...............................................................................................287

The WHO Vaccination Programs ....................................................................289
Ebola as Bioweapon .....................................................................................291
Suspicions ..................................................................................................294
Notes ........................................................................................................298

The Infected World Cup Visitor......................................................................305

Oxitec’s GM “Terminator” Mosquitoes ............................................................308
Back to the Future ......................................................................................311
The Microcephaly Problem ............................................................................312
The Media Focus .........................................................................................314
Notes ........................................................................................................320

16.1. ZIKA South America, 2015 ...................................................................324

16.2. ZIKA and Microcephaly ........................................................................325
16.3. Oxitec’s Failures .................................................................................326
16.4. Gain of Function Research....................................................................327
16.5. Oxitec Mosquito trials in Florida and California ........................................328
16.6. Here Comes Doomsday .......................................................................329
16.7. Concerns for Fertility. Is This About Sterilisation and Depopulation? ..........333
16.8. The Usual Group of Suspects, and a Few New One ..................................335
16.9. Epilogue ............................................................................................337
NOTES .......................................................................................................339

5
1. Chapter 1 – Introduction

I will repeat here a few comments from the Introduction to the previous series, The
World of Biological Warfare, since they are especially pertinent to the content of this
next series of articles. I wrote earlier that we tend to think of biological warfare in simple
terms within a simple framework, imagining the use of these agents in times of war, such
as the US inflicting biological pathogens in North Korea (as it did), or dispersing
swine flu in Cuba and China (as it also did). But biological warfare acts in many guises
and has many objectives. It also has many categories of perpetrators as well as
classifications of intended victims.

Biological warfare has long since passed from the military world into the civilian
one, a fact that will be illuminated by the content of these essays. The main actors
are no longer restricted to state governments but, as we will see, are now
often institutions, NGOs, corporations like Big Pharma and Big Agra, and even UN

6
agencies like the WHO and UNICEF, but all collaborating in some fashion at the higher
levels. Because of this, it is not always easy to identify the powers for whom the
perpetrators are ultimately acting.

Shepherd Józef Klimowski, left, and others lead a flock of sheep in Nowy Targ, Poland, in the
country’s southern highlands, on Oct. 8.Maciek Nabrdalik—The New York Times/Redux

When the US government and military conducted their decades-long litany of biological and
chemical experiments on the American population, this counts as biological warfare.
Similarly, when the US military subjected its soldiers to various pathogens and vaccines,
in biological experiments designed to learn how to infect and disable an enemy’s military,
these also count as biological warfare.

Turning to another direction, when a group of financiers and industrialists conspire

to kill off domestic animal herds or flocks so that Big Agra can eliminate small
farmers and take control of a nation’s food supply,as they almost certainly did in the
US and the UK as we will see, this also classifies as biological warfare even though the
targets in this case are animals.

7
65% of conventional cotton products end up in our food chain, directly through food oils or indirectly
through the milk and meats of animals feeding on cotton seed meal and cotton gin by-
products. Source

The prospect of depopulation is another example of increasingly immediate

concern. As you may already know, the UN’s WHO concocted a “sterility vaccine”
utilising the human female hormone Hcg combined with tetanus toxoid as a carrier and, in
Third-World countries, sterilised about 150 million women without their
knowledge, under the guise of conducting tetanus vaccinations. This will be covered
in a later Chapter. There is yet another aspect to this: GM seed. It is by now well-known
that various companies and governments have succeeded in splicing many
different pathogens into GM seed, which actions can easily be malignant as when
companies produced spermicidal corn that would render men sterile.

In fact, it has been proven that a great many deadly pathogens can be spliced into GM
seed, with consequences I will leave to your imagination. GM seed qualifies as biological
warfare, at least potentially. In the same context of depopulation, seed and bio-chemical
companies were in the recent past suddenly promoting the use of cotton seeds as a primary
foodstuff for underdeveloped countries. Cotton seeds are toxic, containing a chemical
called gossypol which is an effective male sterilant. The seed companies claimed to
have removed this toxin to a safe level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very
minute doses taken repeatedly (as when used for a basic food) will render an entire male
population sterile. This also qualifies as biological warfare, in this case by Western
governments and UN agencies against the population of the entire Third World.

8
 Zika virus hijacks the host cell’s own defense mechanism to cause disease. Source

Drug trials and vaccinations are other categories of concern. There are quite a few
instances where it appears almost certain that a major pharmaceutical company arranged
for a disease outbreak in a poor country – with the kind assistance of the WHO’s ubiquitous
vaccination programs – to save the cost of live trials of a new experimental
medication. These are also classified as biological warfare, in this case by a UN
agency and a big pharma company against the poor people of the world. There are
other categories too. Sometimes pathogens can be released which are harmless in
themselves but can be used to create fear which can then be applied to remake a
nation’s social policies. As one example, it is obvious to intelligent observers that the
ZIKA virus was deliberately dispersed to create sufficient fear among the involved
populations to force national governments to relax their policies on abortion. I will
deal with this later as well.

9
In all of these circumstances, it has become exceedingly difficult to know whom to trust. It
seems increasingly that those who should be our protectors, or our “whistle-blowers”, and
our “investigative media” are those who are most likely to mislead us and lie to us.

I would remind you of the US government conducting nearly 1,000 above-ground nuclear
tests to determine the effects on a population of nuclear radiation, with Eisenhower
instructing the media to tell women suffering miscarriages, hair loss and cancers,
that they were suffering from “housewife syndrome”. There are many dozens of such
outrageous examples in the books of buried history, with compelling evidence that the
authorities will commit these atrocities, then lie, deny, stonewall, and classify as “top-
secret”, until all the participants have died.

The mass media, who should expose these travesties, are often the most
shameless liars, covering up until the end.

It is important to realise that in virtually all instances the mass media provide only a few
sound bytes but no detail; their claims are almost always made without evidence. Yet
observers challenging these empty claims are quicky dismissed as conspiracy
theorists. Even worse, the “fact-checkers” are owned or controlled by the same media
groups or their friends, and the fact-checking consists merely of denial – one empty claim
defending another empty claim, neither providing documented evidence to
support their positions.

In reading through the following Chapters of plagues, epidemics, and pandemics, your best
friend is cynicism, followed by a healthy dose of suspicion that refuses to accept any official
explanation without irrefutable proof. In the real world of domestic and foreign
affairs, including epidemics and “pathogen leakages”, there are very few events
that could be termed as accidents.

When any significant medical emergency (or travesty) arises anywhere in the world, your
first thought should be that it was planned, and you should normally not revise that opinion
unless and until the authorities provide irrefutable evidence to the contrary.

This means refusing to accept an idle claim that “SARS, MERS, or COVID
originated from bats”, but demanding firm evidence to document these
assertions, evidence that is beyond dispute. In fact, aside from things like volcanoes
and tornadoes, your safety is in assuming a certainty that these events were planned, and
to act accordingly.

10
One of our worst enemies is a natural human tendency to assume the best in our media
and our leaders, or at least to refuse to accept the worst explanation. We are held back by
our own trusting nature that prompts us to say, “They would never do that.” It is sometimes
very difficult for us to accept that the truth is, “Yes, they would do that”, based on
the evidence that “they” have done similar things hundreds of times. The US
government deliberately sent the Lusitania (carrying illegal cargos of munitions) into the
path of German U-boats, instructing the captain to not pursue a zig-zag course, and to
travel slowly near the coastline. A great many lives were sacrificed to give the US an excuse
to enter the European war. This is proven fact, not fantasy. Similarly, it has now been
adequately proven that the US knew the precise date and time of the Japanese attack on
Pearl Harbor, but refused to notify Hawaii because that attack was necessary to justify an
American entry into the Second World War. This, which was for decades dismissed as
another “conspiracy theory” is now proven fact. The sacrifice of a few thousand
lives was irrelevant in the larger political picture.

Romney’s “Treason” Smear of Tulsi Gabbard is False and Noxious, But Now Typifies U.S.
Discourse. Source

11
In the next Chapter you will read of the thousands of unconscionable experiments
conducted by the US government and military against the citizens of the United States,
experiments that were denied, accompanied by thousands of lies, until the truth finally
emerged. I would remind you of the syphilis experiments carried out by the US government
in Tuskegee and in Guatemala, in the latter case infecting thousands with a venereal
disease to determine how best to spread it and to observe the deterioration of the victims.
Penicillin was freely available, but all were left to slowly die for the sake of an
“experiment”. If you want to understand the powers, agendas, and purposes
behind all these recent “medical events”, you must thoroughly disabuse yourself
of any notion that there are morals or ethics in government, military, or the
media. There are not.

As you read through the examples discussed in this series, keep these cautions in mind
and it should become increasingly clear that many past biological events we dismissed as
accidents were almost certainly carefully planned and with a very definite purpose. And as
you review in your mind the “official narrative” from governments and the media on these
events, it should become increasingly clear to you that the official stories in many
cases could not have possibly been true.

Lastly, in all the examples of outbreaks of strange illnesses in these Chapters, keep in
mind the criteria for identification of the potential application of a biological
weapon:

* Disease caused by an unusual, rare, or uncommon pathogen, or an unusual strain of a

common pathogen, indicating it was potentially genetically engineered

* Lack of an epidemiological explanation. i.e., no clear idea of source or origin, no

evident “cause” (other than undocumented media speculation), no patient zero.

* Unusual presentation or manifestation of the disease, i.e., race-specific

* Unusual geographic or seasonal distribution;

* Multiple epidemics. Simultaneous outbreaks at different locations with the same

organism

* Reverse or simultaneous spread. Diseases typically occur first among a susceptible

animal population, then spread to humans.

As you read the details of these events, epidemics and pandemics, ask yourself in each
case which of the events appear suspect, in which cases does the “official
narrative” appear contrived and false, and which events meet the necessary
criteria for the deliberate deployment of a biological agent.

12
 DARPA Commits $65M to Brain Implant Program for Super Soldier Project. Source

Contents

2.1. Introduction

2.2. A Brief Summary

2.3. Project Listing and Description

2.4. Other Biological Tests

2.5. Some Notable “Experiments”

13
2.1. Introduction

The Trinity Nulear Test. Source

Covert nuclear, biological and chemical experiments on the American public are not new.
For at least the past 75 years, the US government waged a war against its own citizens, a
long history of performing illegal, unethical, and immoral
experiments. [1] [2] [3] Countless millions of US civilians have been exposed to
astonishing procedures and pathogens. According to a US Congressional investigation, by
the late 1970s “at least 500,000 people were used as subjects in radiation, biological and
chemical experiments sponsored by the US Federal Government on its own
citizens”. [4] [5] [6] However, as with all US Congressional Investigations, the content
was severely whitewashed, with the actual count of victimised Americans being almost
certainly in the tens of millions. [7] BBC Radio 4 did a long series of podcasts on these
experiments, the series titled “Hotel Anthrax”. [8] I am providing the link here, but the
broadcasts have been archived and the pages don’t always load.

For many decades, nobody in the US was safe from victimisation in these bio-warfare tests
and experiments on civilians. At one time the CIA even infiltrated the drinking water supply
of the FDA headquarters in Washington (I can hardly imagine a more worthy candidate for
a biological experiment than the FDA) with a not altogether harmless chemical, to test its

14
ability to poison drinking water supplies with LSD and other mind-altering agents. By 1950
the US military was actively conducting open-air tests throughout the country,
experimenting with large numbers of viruses and harmful bacteria, and huge volumes of
each, exposing millions of civilians to disease and death. Concurrently, the CIA was actively
conducting their own experiments, using their authority to withdraw pathogens at will from
the military’s bio-warfare arsenal.

The US government exposed millions of Americans to chemical and biological agents, in

clandestine experiments that spanned many decades. In the 1950s and sixties, scientists
from the Fort Detrick biological weapons program ran a series of tests to determine how
easy it would be to expose large numbers of people to a lethal bacterium. These tests were
part of an experimental program originating mostly at Fort Detrick that began in the late
1940s and has not abated. During the first 20 years alone, the US military
acknowledged that about 250 such tests had been conducted in which many tens
of millions of civilians were unknowingly exposed. When these tests or programs
were discovered, the military consistently claimed the agents employed were harmless to
humans, but it has become abundantly clear over the years that many of these chemical
and biological agents were far from harmless.

Pentagon Records declassified in 2002 revealed that the US government and military
often conducted open-air Biological and Chemical Weapons Tests on US civilians until at
least the 1970s. The documents disclosed that these hundreds of biological and chemical
tests were far more widespread than the US military had previously acknowledged.

For various reasons, the 1970s and 1980s experienced a flood of disclosures that
opened a window into a vast array of literally hundreds of unethical and criminal
enterprises of brutal and often fatal human experimentation conducted by the US
government against its own citizens. Despite this, there still remain large numbers of
experiments that are suspected but cannot now be proven, often because all
documentation was destroyed in response to overwhelming public anger and realistic fears
of increasing political instability, to say nothing of a potential flood of millions of lawsuits.

These pages contain only a brief summary of the litany of biological warfare carried out the
by the US government and its various agencies against the American people, with
considerable evidence these experiments are still continuing today. The US government
hypocritically claims the high moral ground in the area of human rights, but I am not aware
of any nation in recent memory that has ever displayed such a consistent, despicable, and
utter disregard for the lives of its own citizens. The content of this series of essays on bio-
chemical warfare begins with unpleasant details of US government atrocities, and it
becomes worse as we progress through the content.

In May of 2009, James Corbett wrote an article titled “Governments and Biowarfare:
A Brief History”, [9] in which he stated: “The American government’s approach to
biowarfare is notable for its unabashed use of unwitting American citizens as guinea pigs
in biological weapons research. The very people who helped establish the U.S. biological
15
weapons programs openly bragged about their experiments on unwitting human test
subjects. And there is no shortage of documentation proving that governments
have used biological agents against their own citizens in bioterror false flag
operations. It is no coincidence that two of the most well-known and devastating biological
releases this decade have traced back to Fort Detrick (the home of the U.S. biological
weapons research program since the 1950s and the current home of USAMRIID)
and Porton Down (Fort Detrick’s British equivalent). UK foot and mouth disease, and US
anthrax scare.”

Before proceeding further, I would make a few initial comments. The first is that
comprehensive information on this large topic is quite difficult to access. Many official
documents have been destroyed, with others still classified or otherwise unavailable and,
while some information is accessible in the public realm, it is scattered and often lacking
useful detail. Most sources provide only a small amount of information, often omitting the
most serious and damaging events or experiments, while often attempting to “soften” the
information by linking American atrocities to something imaginary Germany or Russia did
(or might have done, or could have done, or would have liked to have done …) Also, in
many cases, including some of the US mass media websites, viewers receive a notice
that “This content is not available in your area”, or “You are not authorized to
access this page”. I was disappointed to see that ahrp.org was especially useless except
in a few isolated instances, providing only a few descriptive words on major atrocities.

Another major disappointment is that websites we tend to trust, often prove untrustworthy,
by glossing over or trivialising major atrocities and often by disparaging authors who
attempt to expose these. Andrew Goliszek wrote a book titled “In the Name of
Science”, [10] in which he exposes many of these human experiments and atrocities. His
book is available for purchase, and limited previews are available on archive.org. [11] In
this context, I was very disappointed that Salon magazine chose to trash this whistle-
blower and trivialise the insane medical experiments performed on Americans. [12] From
their article: “Unfortunately, Goliszek is an aggravatingly overheated writer, and as an
investigator he can be lazy, too often relying on dubious sources and presenting only one
side of the story. He is also a poor analyst of the facts he presents. [H]e skips from scientific
disgrace to scientific disgrace with the glee of a freak-show emcee.” Often, the National
Geographic, the Smithsonian, and others similar, seem to do something similar, with
perhaps less personal smear but with the same intent and result. And the intent is to
circle the wagons when the truth escapes confinement, and to paint the whistle-
blowers as deranged conspiracy theorists when they are not.

I stated earlier that America’s human rights calculus excludes any atrocities committed
outside its own borders and focuses only on what happens at home. That’s mostly true
today, but it wasn’t always like this. In fact, all the strident and self-righteous moralising
about human rights emanating from the US today is a relatively recent development that
began only in the late 1970s and 1980s. Prior to that time, the CIA, every branch of the
US military, many Departments of the US government, most prominent American
hospitals and educational institutions, and even UN agencies like the WHO, were
all very busy committing countless atrocities against the domestic US population. It was
only after evidence of many of these events escaped confinement and became
public knowledge that the US relocated its human-rights atrocities offshore. The
16
increasing public outcries and dangers of civil uprising forced the US to terminate or
relocate these activities and, having made this effort to clean up the mess at home, the
propaganda machine worked overtime to distract the American public and deflect attention
from these domestic crimes by focusing on real or imagined violations by others abroad. It
was only at this point that the Americans began preaching their newly-obtained sanctity by
condemning other nations for what were much smaller transgressions than those practiced
at home for so long.

Senate investigations produced substantial evidence that almost 250 populated areas of
the US had been heavily contaminated with biological agents prior to 1970, with no
information on the contamination since then. At that same time, the US experienced a
major outbreak of the H1N1 flu strain that was apparently genetically identical to one that
had disappeared more than 20 years prior, leading to the conclusion that the military had
collected and preserved that strain for future application and had now deployed
it in a test. The US military publicly admitted in 1977 that many hundreds of bio-warfare
experiments had been conducted in the continental US since World War II, and
that several dozens of those involved serious and potentially fatal biological
agents.

In 1994, the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs conducted what it described as “a

comprehensive analysis stretching back 50 years of the extent to which veterans
were exposed to potentially dangerous substances without knowledge or
consent”. They produced what some termed “a damning report” concluding the Defense
Department demonstrated “a consistent pattern of misrepresentation” of the hazards
of its activity, and had “used” hundreds of thousands of unwitting military
personnel alone, to say nothing of millions of civilians, in bio-warfare experiments
spanning at least 50 years. A synopsis is available here: [13] The full report is available
here: [14]

The United States Government Accountability Office issued a report on September 28,
1994, which stated that between 1940 and 1974, the United States Department of Defense
and other national security agencies studied hundreds of thousands of human subjects in
tests and experiments involving hazardous substances. [15] A quotation from the report:

Many experiments that tested various biological agents on human subjects, referred to
as Operation Whitecoat, were carried out at Fort Detrick, Maryland, for about twenty
years from 1953 to 1973. [16]. The human subjects originally consisted of volunteer
enlisted men. However, the enlisted men soon staged a sit-down strike to obtain more
information about the dangers of the biological tests, and many questions were raised
about the “voluntary” aspect of the victims. No follow-ups of note were done, nor were
records kept, of the participants. The US military later claimed it had contact information
for only about 1,000 of the original participants. The official claim is that no one died
in these experiments and that “only two” persons suffered “long-term medical
complications”, but knowing the list of pathogens used and considering that the military
refuses to declassify the records, we can be forgiven for harboring doubts.

17
The official Government text, Medical Aspects of Biological
Warfare (2007), [17] [18] makes several interesting admissions. It states that between
about 1950 and 1970, “at least 239 open-air ‘field tests’ were conducted in the US in which
the general public and test subjects were uninformed”. These tests contained all
manner of biological and chemical pathogens which were dispersed over heavily-
populated areas that included Minneapolis, St. Louis, New York City, San Francisco, and
several of the military’s own bases including Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. The report further
states that “In conjunction with the US Department of Agriculture”, the military released
“anti-crop agents” throughout the US, i.e. herbicides lethal to the nation’s food supply. It
states further that the open-air releases of pathogens were performed “to study viability
and infectivity”, the resulting massive flood of medical disabilities and the many
deaths being either unexpected or perhaps irrelevant.

However, the report notes plaintively, “These studies [performed without knowledge
or consent of the victims] tainted the history of the offensive biological warfare
program”. We don’t need an imagination to understand why.

While we can appreciate his candor, the Surgeon-General failed to record the instances
where, in testing “techniques of biological pathogen dispersion” the city of Minneapolis
was sprayed with germ warfare materials 61 different times in tests lasting
several months, or that the “assumption” the pathogens were “harmless” may have been
incorrect in light of the enormous increase in respiratory illnesses experienced in
the dispersal areas in and near Minneapolis. He also failed to record the test with the
foolish code name of “Big Tom”, where the Department of Defense sprayed the entire
population of Oahu in 1965 with a bacterium while practicing a planned attack on
Cuba. He also failed to note that Big Tom caused serious infections in tens of
thousands of people, particularly those young, elderly, or ill with weakened
immune systems. The Surgeon-General informs us further that, included in these other
environmental field tests, the military did indeed conduct many “controversial studies” that
were meant “to determine whether African Americans were more susceptible”. They
were.

Finally, the report tells us that “Public disclosure of the testing program in the Washington
Post on December 22 , 1976, and in US Senate hearings in 1977 resulted in harsh criticism
…”. But then we are told the CDC investigated the matter of the US military poisoning the
population and concluded that in 100 outbreaks of one particularly dangerous bacterium,
“none was caused by the [strain used by the military], and the vast outbreaks of illnesses
by the same bacteria were simply unfortunate accidents caused by “opportunistic
pathogens”. Such a big lie.

In a further attempt to un-blemish his record, the Surgeon-General also claims

that “Numerous unsubstantiated allegations were made” about the US using
biological pathogens against North Korea and China, and swears that “Biological
weapons have never been used by the US military”, but that the US State
Department “suspected” China, Russia and Cuba to have done so.

18
2.2. A Brief Summary

Beginning around 1950, the US Army conducted at least 240 open-air bio-warfare
attacks [19] on American cities, releasing deadly nerve agents and bacteria from Alaska
to Hawaii. [20] In one of these cases in the 1950s, The CIA released whooping cough
bacteria from the sea near Tampa Bay, Florida, to test their ability to infect human
populations on a large scale [21] causing an epidemic that left tens of thousands of people
extremely ill and killing many others.

Whooping cough (Pertussis) was chosen because it is a highly-contagious airborne disease

that spreads easily and is often fatal, especially to small children. The disease causes such
violent coughing that victims can break their own ribs, the coughing spells leaving them
exhausted. An enormous number of people became seriously ill, and many died,
none realising their distress was visited upon them by their own government.

19
Source

20
In one long-running study that continued until at least 1970, the US Navy simulated
biological warfare attacks by spraying large quantities of a bacteria over a 117 square mile
area of the city of San Francisco, in which many citizens died and countless contracted
serious pneumonia-like illnesses. [22] [23] [24] In one such test of many, the Military
determined that San Francisco had received enough of a dose for nearly all of the city’s
800,000 residents to inhale at least 5,000 of the Serratia Marcescens bacteria particles.
After news of this attack became public, military sources insisted the bacteria were
‘harmless”, but in fact resulting illnesses were widespread, with countless thousands
incurring serious urinary tract infections, respiratory infections, pneumonia and
other illnesses. According to authorities, these infections were permanent: “To this day,
these bacteria are a leading cause of death among the elderly in the San Francisco
area”. After revelation of the tests about 30 years later, some families filed suit against
the US government claiming their relatives died and many families went bankrupt trying
to pay the medical bills, but US courts all the way to the Supreme Court, declared the US
government was immune from lawsuits.

The US Military also experimented with widespread dispersal of dangerous

bacteria in a secret release of another strain of bacillus at Washington’s National
Airport and its main bus terminal.

Operation Big Buzz was an experiment that took place in June 1955 in Savannah, Georgia and again
in Avon Park, Florida in 1956 under the name Operation Drop Kick. Source

In another famous study, US Army biological warfare experiments were conducted in

Georgia and Florida where researchers released millions of infected mosquitoes to learn if
the insects could potentially spread yellow fever and dengue fever. Hundreds of residents
contracted a wide array of health problems ranging from respiratory difficulties
to spontaneous abortions and stillbirths. No information was given to the public, and
no treatment was offered to the ill and dying. Instead, Army researchers pretended to

21
be public health workers, and visited the victims to collect photographs and to
perform medical tests to determine “the success rate” of their experiments, with
no permanent records kept, and illnesses and deaths attributed to “other causes”.

Containers of semi-toxic bacteria were planted in the New York subway, and bacteria were
secretly pumped into the Pentagon (another great candidate for a biological experiment)
ventilation system and clouds of bacteria were released in San Francisco. The process never
stopped. In 2005, US Homeland Security released a claimed (but unidentified)
“nontoxic gas” into New York’s Grand Central Station to trace the flow of airborne
chemicals through the terminal.

During the widespread public protests against the Vietnam war in the 1960s, the US military
asked President Nixon for permission to test its arsenal of biological and chemical weapons
against the civilian war protestors, to (1) demonstrate the “efficacy” of the chemicals and
biological agents, (2) “control” the protestors and eliminate future protests, and (3)
“educate people” on gas weaponry.

1966: ‘A Study of the Vulnerability of Subway Passengers in New York City to Covert Attack with
Biological Agents,” military officials tried to see how easy it would be to unleash biological weapons
using the New York City subway. They would break light bulbs full of bacteria on the tracks to see
how they spread through the city. Source

22
During the late 1960s, the US Army conducted an experiment they called, “A Study of the
Vulnerability of Subway Passengers in New York City to Covert Attack with Biological
Agents”, in which they released trillions of a strain of bacillus into the subway system during
the rush hour. This was only one of many such experiments, which were not suspended
until the 1970s. The US Army acknowledged that they conducted hundreds such tests in
populated areas across the entire nation, and that US overseas territories like
Hawaii, the Pacific Islands and others were repeatedly blanketed with various
bacteriological organisms in order to determine the optimum dosages and placements
as well as to measure effects of the weather on dissemination patterns.

Following its grand success in obtaining the bio-warfare and human experimentation
treasures from the Japanese atrocity programs conducted at Unit 731, the US government
embarked on literally hundreds of these secret projects, many begun by one of America’s
most morally-deformed psychopaths, US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara. One of
the better-known efforts was labeled “Project 112”, which number was its position in a list
of more than 150 clandestine bio-chemical projects operated by McNamara against
American civilians and military personnel, with funds and operating staff from every branch
of the US military and intelligence agencies. Many of the numbered projects in this series
of 150, contained numerous sub-projects, and many of those contained further sub-
projects. The truth of the total will never be known because the records have been
destroyed. Perhaps the most famous and inclusive of these was Project 112. [25] [26]

On September 20, 1950, a US Navy ship just off the coast of San Francisco used a giant hose to spray
a cloud of microbes into the air and into the city’s famous fog. The military was testing how a
biological weapon attack would affect the 800,000 residents of the city. Source

23
Project 112 was a series of biological and chemical weapons experiments that primarily
involved the dissemination of airborne biological pathogens meant to incapacitate civilian
populations, that was secretly conducted on a massive scale within the US, Canada, the
UK, and in vast swatches of the Pacific and some other undeveloped countries as well. This
vast program was the umbrella under which many hundreds of biological dispersion
tests were carried out in the continental US against the civilian population. Some
of these experiments involved potentially harmless strains but many others were quite
lethal and led to thousands of deaths and permanent debilitations within large sectors
of the US civilian population, the tests in San Francisco and Florida being two obvious
examples of the latter.

There were many parts to this Project, with many of them covering extensive areas of both
the US and Canada, some pathogen dispersals reportedly covering the entire United States.
The names of some of the more prominent biological programs: Operation DEW, Operation
LAC, Project SHAD, all part of the very extensive Project 112. Operation
Dew [27] consisted of several separate experiments to determine the feasibility of
maintaining a large aerosol cloud released offshore until it drifted over land, achieving a
huge land coverage and poisoning or killing all the area inhabitants. Operation
LAC [28] involved the spraying of carcinogens and pathogens over large areas of the US
and Canada, intended to test the dispersal patterns and potential geographic range of
chemical and biological weapons.

Many of these “experiments” were conducted on US military servicemen without

their knowledge, a major portion of which was conducted in a series of shipboard trials
on unwitting American sailors, the project collectively known as SHAD, [29] or Shipboard
Hazard and Defense. With project SHAD, the military initially claimed the tests were
designed to identify US warships’ vulnerabilities to attack, but it gradually became clear
the real purpose was a search for ways to overcome defenses of enemy ships, methods to
guarantee the total destruction with biological pathogens of enemy naval forces at sea.
One excessively ambitious effort involved attempts to literally envelop a vast section of
ocean in a pervasive cloud of biological pathogens that would kill an entire enemy
marine fleet while at sea. The military stoutly maintains that no one suffered
injury from these tests, belied by the fact that the US government Veterans
website contains instructions on claiming compensation for these injuries. [30]

These were by admission very large-scale experiments that were expected to leave
“significant or protracted effects on the physical or biological
environment”. Understand what this means: the military fully expected their tests to do
lasting or permanent harm to the environment and the people. At one time, for this
program alone, the military developed – and tested – on US farms and citizens more
than 1,000 anti-crop biological pathogens and defoliants. A vast array of pathogens
was weaponised and prepared in cluster bombs for delivery to unfortunate victims. The
tests used at least 20 different biological pathogens plus another 15 or 20 chemical agents
that included Sarin and VX nerve gases, mustard gas, tear gas, and other unknown
substances. The program went so far as to search desperately for methods of inducing
biological epidemics in both plant and animal populations – in addition, of course, to entirely
separate methods of killing off the human population.

24
Since the victims were unaware of these projects and were unwitting participants, informed
consent clearly did not exist, the document record further revealing the US Defense
Department conducted many of the tests in foreign countries since they were
considered too unethical to perform at home. Given the illegalities and international
implications, to say nothing of the domestic deaths and injuries, the entire existence of
Project 112 (and SHAD) was heatedly and categorically denied by the US military,
repeatedly insisting that such a program had never existed. When a CBS news report
revealed some dramatic evidence and indisputable proof of the programs, the
Pentagon and Defense Department exhibited “total surprise”, then made pretenses
of conducting “an internal investigation” to determine if such a program had really existed
– presumably without their knowledge. Later, to mollify an enraged public, the requisite
whitewashed Congressional hearings were held, after which the entire matter
was quietly swept under the carpet.

2.3. Project Listing and Description

2.3.1. Insectology

The program aims to develop virus-transmitting insects that infest crops. With the help of the genome
editing tool Crispr-Cas the viruses can modify the plants’ genomes. Source

That is a new word I created to categorise the US military’s nearly 75-year pathological
interest in weaponsing insects for use as biological weapons against unfavored
nations. And these do not have to be countries with which the US is actively at
war, but merely uncompromising anti-colonials who don’t want to obey the
master. These tests and experiments began immediately after WWII and, if anything, have
increased over time, with devious programs being carried out at USAMRIID, Dugway, and

25
many other locations, and this has definitely emerged into the private sector as well, with
many corporate entities now participating, in addition to US NGOs and UN agencies like the
WHO.

The United States has developed and stockpiled a variety of biological weapons agents
since the late 1960s. The most prominent agents known to have been developed at the
time were Anthrax, Tularemia, Brucellosis, Q-fever, Hantavirus, Venezuelan Equine
Encephalitis virus, and Botulism, but there have been many more. The list is very long,
and most of these can be communicated by insects in one form or another. Q-fever,
Brucellosis, Botulism, Anthrax, and Tularemia are bacterial infections spread in various
ways, and Botulism in particular can cause death if untreated. Venezuelan Equine
Encephalitis (VEE) virus is a mosquito-borne virus that can cause serious neurological
disorders. Anthrax is of course, very contagious and most often fatal.

With nature not always being cooperative, there is no way to know or to foresee or even
to predict the potential long-term results of some of these programs. Natural mutations
could easily create insect Frankensteins that cannot later be corralled. Think of the innocent
transplantation of rabbits to Australia. Live organisms are capable of chain reactions
that would be unimaginable to us. There are also moral and ethical questions. It is
scientifically possible to infect mosquitoes, for example, with a COVID vaccine and “force”
an entire population to be infected against their will. This is very much the hope of Bill
Gates and Oxitec but, just because something of this nature can be done, should it be
done? What happened to “informed consent”? And where will our clearly psychopathic
leaders be willing to stop? Will they ever stop?

Below, we have a list of some of the insect-related biological warfare attempts, tests,
experiments, and this is by no means a complete list.

2.3.2. Project Bellwether

Project Bellwether went further and performed experiments where infected mosquitoes bit humans,
though the mosquitos were infected with inert diseases. Source

26
This was a long set of more than 50 experiments conducted at the Dugway Proving
Ground that used the female mosquito Aedes aegypti (Yellow Fever Mosquito) to
assess the possibility of transmitting fatal or debilitating diseases to an enemy’s
forces and population. [31] [32] It was part of a very ambitious and determined
program by the US military to weaponise insects, part of Project 112, and related to
Projects Drop Kick, Big Buzz, Big Itch, and all the others similar.

2.3.3. Operation Magic Sword

Operation Magic Sword was a biological warfare experiment to determine whether

mosquitoes infected with yellow fever and/or Venezuelan equine encephalitis (VEE) could
be successfully bred and then released from a ship near an enemy shore. This was a cousin
to the Operations Drop Kick, Big Buzz, and Big Itch. The military claim the mosquitos used
for this Operation were uninfected, and that they never conducted such tests with these
live pathogens, but the truth may be otherwise. One of the arsenals produced around 3,000
gallons of VEE and Q-fever, and there is no compelling evidence that these supplies were
27
not used. It naturally arouses much suspicion since the US government and military have
been proven to have lied about every such experiment in one way or another, one of the
most common claims being that the pathogens used were “harmless” while the public were
experiencing a virtual epidemic. [33] [34] [35]

2.3.4. Florida GM Mosquitoes

A biologist in Brazil releases mosquitoes to combat a Zika outbreak. Source

In 2022, Oxitec released over 750 million genetically engineered mosquitoes as part of a
‘mosquito control’ program. According to EPA’s Experimental Use Permit: “Oxitec will
release into the environment male mosquitoes genetically modified to carry a protein that
will inhibit the survival of their female offspring when they mate with wild female
mosquitoes. The male offspring will survive to become fully functional adults with the same
genetic modification, providing multi-generational effectiveness that could ultimately lead
to a reduction in Aedes aegypti mosquito populations in the release
areas.” [36] [37] [38] [39]

However, in “a previous experiment conducted from 2013 to 2015, Oxitec released

mosquitoes in Brazil that carried an earlier engineered gene, OX513A, and
eventually released those with OX5034 as well. While the company declared the
release a success, scientists unaffiliated with Oxitec from Yale and a handful of
Brazilian institutions published research in the journal Nature Scientific Reports
claiming the mosquitoes had mated, produced viable offspring, and ultimately
created a new genetic hybrid population capable of surviving in the wild.”

28
To make matters worse, these are the same mosquitoes – and the same company –
that Bill Gates enthused about and called “flying syringes”, in that the insects could be
used to administer what would be essentially forcible COVID and other vaccinations. The
prospects are terrifying, and it appears more likely than ever that ZIKA was a trial
run. I covered this in an article you may care to read: “COVID Vaccinations and Oxitec’s
“Flying Syringes”. [40]

2.3.5. Insect Allies

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, an arm of the U.S. Department of Defense, is
planning to use insects to deliver genetically engineered viruses to crops, with the aim of altering the
plant’s genetic traits in the field. Source

The Insect Allies program is a recent (2016) DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency) initiative ostensibly to protect American crops from various climatic and pestilential
misfortunes, [41] But DARPA is not about protecting anything. These insect
experiments were presented to the public as “gene therapy for crops”, methods of reducing
the need for chemical insecticides and pesticides. But extreme concern has been expressed
by competent scientists who believe the project is actually developing methods to deliver
a new class of biological weapons, that this is really just another American insecticide
warfare program. There is no question that, from the days of Dr. Ishii after WWII, the US
military has taken very seriously the possibilities inherent in weaponising all manner of
insects. One report at Science.org [42] states, “The critics charge that “the program may
be widely perceived as an effort to develop biological agents for hostile purposes and their
means of delivery. It’s hard to see such a justification for Insect Allies … because
the method is hard to control and unlikely to be allowed in peacetime. Besides,
there is an easier way to introduce viruses to plants: spraying.”

29
2.3.6. Operation May Day

Operation May Day: Aedes Aegypti mosquitoes were dispersed through ground-based methods in
Georgia, USA, during a US Army operation codenamed May Day. Source

Operation May Day involved a series of insect warfare tests (on the American
population) to discover the best methods of dispersing yellow fever mosquitoes
in an urban area. The tests were conducted primarily in Savannah, Georgia. [43] [44]

30
2.3.7. Operation Drop Kick

Source

Then we had “Operation Drop Kick“, [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] designed to test various
ways of dispersing mosquitoes infected with various biological pathogens over large
geographical areas, these tests carried out over many parts of the continental US, including
most of the East Coast. There were other of these programs of course, all with foolish
names and all designed to assess the dissemination of infected insects and other lethal
pathogens into civilian populations. These were not minor operations, with the military on
occasion releasing one million or more infected mosquitoes into a single civilian area. They
were kept very secret since they were illegal in terms of domestic law and
contravened international law and many weapons treaties that other nations signed
with the US in good faith. For those of you still adhering to the COVID religion, you might
care to read this article titled COVID Vaccinations and Oxitec’s “Flying
Syringes”, [50] and see if you can make any connections.
31
2.3.8. Operation Big Buzz

32
Operation Big Buzz was an experiment that took place in Georgia and Florida under the
umbrella of Operation Drop Kick. The tests involved dropping hundreds of thousands of
aedes aegypti mosquitos from airplanes to determine whether they could disperse yellow
fever among a population as a method of biological warfare. Millions of female mosquitoes
were bred, and infected with yellow fever. It doesn’t appear that yellow fever-infected
insects were dispersed in this particular case, but there exists much suspicion that the
mosquitoes were infected with something. There were many reports of the Army
sending officers disguised as health workers to interview the population and
gather information on the resulting diseases and epidemics, a subterfuge the
military has used many times when dispersing a pathogen on the American public.
This was especially true of areas where the populations were mostly
black. [51] [52] [53] [54]

2.3.9. Operation Big Itch

A C-119 Flying Boxcar, the type of plane used to release the chemicals. Source

This was a series of tests at Dugway, designed to determine coverage patterns and
survivability of the tropical rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis) for use in biological warfare as
disease vector. The fleas were loaded into two types of munitions and dropped from the
air. Each munition held 100,000 or 200,000 fleas, and which could survive the drop from
an airplane and wreak the havoc they were meant to do on a civilian population. It was a
copy of the Japanese biological warfare efforts at Unit 731 in
China. [55] [56] [57] [58] [59]

33
2.3.10. Operation LAC

Operation LAC (Large Area Coverage) was a partner to Operation Dew, with similar aims,
that of dispersing biological pathogens or microscopic particles of a chemical pathogen over
very large land areas. Of particular interest was the range of geographical dispersion and
the means of achieving this. [60]

2.3.11. Operation Top Hat

Source

Operation Top Hat was an exercise conducted by the US military that involved the use of
Chemical Corps personnel to test biological and chemical warfare decontamination
methods. Military personnel were deliberately exposed to mustard gas, nerve gases, and
biological pathogens so the army could test decontamination methods. The men used in
the tests were not volunteers and were not informed of the tests. [61] [62] [63]

34
2.3.12. Project 112

Project 112/Project SHAD. Source

Project 112 was a massive series of biological and chemical weapons experiments
conducted by the United States Department of Defense from 1962 to 1973 that primarily
involved the dissemination of airborne biological pathogens meant to incapacitate
civilian populations, that was secretly conducted on a large scale within the US, Canada,
the UK, and in vast swatches of the Pacific and some other undeveloped countries as well. It
is necessary to note that the populations in the affected areas were not notified,
meaning national sovereignty was violated in all instances. The Philippines and
Japan were two such locations, but there were many others including Egypt, Liberia,
South Korea, and much of the Pacific, and of course the domestic populations within
the US, Canada and the UK were also kept ignorant of the tests. This ignorance applied
equally to US military servicemen, hundreds of thousands of whom were exposed to many
pathogens with varying levels of lethality, resulting in many deaths and disabilities as was
also true among the tens of millions in the US civilian population. [64] [65] [66] [67]

The tests used at least 20 different biological pathogens plus another 15 or 20

chemical agents that included Sarin and VX nerve gases, mustard gas, tear gas
and other unknown substances. Many of these “experiments” were conducted on US
military servicemen without their knowledge, a major portion of which was conducted in a
series of shipboard trials on unwitting American sailors while at sea. We cannot fail to be
impressed by the passionate determination exhibited to infect populations under every
imaginable circumstance and condition. The US military was determined to “penetrate”
everything from “arctic inversion weather systems” to “destroying the population of an
island complex”, from spreading pathogens over immense areas of open ocean to the

35
penetration of “jungle vegetation”. The dispersal methods ranged from massive spray
generators installed in ships or aircraft to miniatures contained in briefcases.

McNamara ordered the military Joint Chiefs of Staff “to consider all possible
applications” of these agents (testing biological agents on the populations of disfavored
enemy nations), and to develop a coherent plan for the deployment of an “adequate but
total” “biological and chemical deterrent capability”, the plan to include cost estimates and
an “appraisal of international political consequences”. Understand that this was not
meant primarily as a war-time measure, but simply to punish uncooperative nations. The
plan was approved by then President Kennedy in National Security Action Memorandum
235 (NSAM 235), which meant it was a secret and highly-classified program directed
to biological and chemical warfare against humans, animals, and plants, with
testing performed in various combinations of climate and terrain. At least 50 different trials
were conducted, many with biological pathogens and some with chemical agents including
sarin and VX nerve gases, tear gas and mustard gas.

An agreement was made between the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia to
participate in “mutual interest research and development activity and field
testing”, i.e., to permit the US military to poison their citizens as well as its
own. These agreements and tests were classified Top Secret, and no civilian victims in any
country were provided with an opportunity to give informed consent to what was about to
happen to them.

All means of dispersal were imagined and tested. Several such tests using Bacillus globigii,
an “anthrax simulant”, were conducted in Washington DC, with the bacteria released from
spray generators hidden in specially built briefcases. Another series of tests was done in
the New York City Subway system by dropping light bulbs filled with various bacteria. For
nearly ten years, the Rocky Mountain Arsenal grew plant pathogens intended for wheat
crops that were tested in many areas, some outside the US, with stories of American-
initiated crop failures in places like Japan and Okinawa persisting to this day. At
last report there were still nearly 100,000 pounds of this pathogen remaining in
storage for potential future use. [68]

2.4. Other Biological Tests

2.4.1. Operation Dew

Operation Dew was designed to test the feasibility of creating enormous aerosol clouds of
biological pathogens from offshore military vessels and maintaining the clouds intact while
they drifted over land to kill or incapacitate a local population. The military conducted a
wide variety of these tests, at least one of which “dispersed and maintained a cloud of
some 150,000 km² over a heavily populated coastal region that covered three US
states and much of Central Canada.” Some tests were done with cadmium sulfide,
many with various plant spores and other biological pathogens. Many of these tests were
36
done on an astonishingly large scale, with the contaminant clouds covering virtually
the entire continental US, stretching from the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic
Ocean and from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. [69]

2.4.2. Operation Sea-Spray

This was the study that lasted nearly 20 years where the military practiced spraying clouds
of bacteria over San Francisco in attempts to learn how to conduct a real-life biological
weapons attack from a ship near a country’s coastline. [70] [71] [72] [73] [74]

2.4.3. Operation Big City (Also Operation Open Air)

This was one of the CIA’s many abominable pathogen experiments led by Dr. Sidney
Gottlieb, head of the CIA’s secret Project MK-ULTRA. The intention was to find
convenient methods of producing “large-scale aberrant mental states on an
unsuspecting population“, by spraying a compound over an enemy city and rendering
helpless both civilians and military personnel. They were searching for a substance and a
method of producing “mental confusion”, physical disablement”, “shock”, “illogical
thinking”, “hallucinations”, and anything else that might be possible. One dispersal
method was to fit an automobile with specially-designed exhaust pipes that would disperse
a pathogen widely on city streets. Another was to use a special suitcase that would exhaust
such a pathogen as a person walked down a city street. In both cases, LSD was the CIA’s
pathogen of choice.

Another part of this project was to release massive clouds of biological or chemical gas off
the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, intending to blanket the entire city with the
pathogen and to then monitor and assess how powerful were the disorienting properties of
the pathogen. As was typical, the CIA issued strong cautions in internal memos that the
“utmost secrecy” was to be maintained to prevent the public from learning what had
happened to them. The CIA was involved in many such “missions” as part of MK-ULTRA,
including Operation Open Air where biological warfare tests were conducted repeatedly in
the streets and tunnels of New York. [75] [76] [77] [78] [79]

2.4.4. Operation Dark Winter

Operation Dark Winter was a simulation of a biological attack of smallpox conducted in June
of 2001, a project designed by the Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies.
The simulated attacks were carried out in Oklahoma City, and other locations in Georgia
and Pennsylvania. The plans were partly meant to test the weaknesses of the US health
care infrastructure and its ability to handle such an occurrence. [80] [81] [82] It is
noteworthy that many saw this as one of the eerie projects that resembled COVID a bit too
closely for comfort. According to Foreign Policy, “… the fallout from the coronavirus
pandemic bears an eerie resemblance to [this] simulation”. [83] You can decide.

37
2.4.5. Operation Whitecoat

Operation Whitecoat was a medical research project conducted at Fort Detrick by the United
States Army for about 20 years, ending around 175. Its stated purpose was to test the
effects of biological agents and various tropical diseases. The participants were subjected
to a variety of pathogens that included Venezuelan equine encephalitis, Q fever, and
Sandfly fever, among others. This long-running project was supposedly conducted on
volunteers, with the official story that the studies were conducted in “a controlled
environment” and the volunteers “were closely monitored”. But the facts seem to indicate
otherwise. As mentioned earlier, the enlisted men soon staged a sit-down strike to obtain
more information about the dangers of the biological tests, and many questions were raised
about the “voluntary” aspect of the victims. In reality, it appears that either few records
were kept, or they were later destroyed. The US military later claimed it had contact
information for only about 1,000 of the original participants. The official claim is
that no one died in these experiments and that “only two” persons suffered “long-term
medical complications”, but knowing the list of pathogens used and considering that the
military refuses to declassify the records, we can be forgiven for harboring doubts.

Wikipedia tells us that all the “volunteers” were all “conscientious objectors” mostly many
members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, who were informed of the purpose and
goals of each project before providing consent to participate in any project. [84] However,
the Church tells stories of coercion and extortion to obtain these volunteers who were
seldom informed of anything that was about to happen to them. PBS also has produced a
very sanitised version of this study, [85] and the Washington Post calls them “The Military’s
Medical Heroes”, [86] but the questions remain.

2.4.6. Operation Polka Dot

Cluster Bomb, showing bomblets; U.S. Army photograph, ca. 1943 at Rocky Mountain
Arsenal. Source

38
Operation Polka Dot was a field test of the E133 cluster bomb at the Dugway Proving
Ground in Utah. [87] It involved filling the munitions with various biological agents, most
simulating lethal pathogens. They used the bacteria or other agents for anthrax, Botulinum,
Tularemia, and the Venezuelan Equine encephalomyelitis virus, among others. It was the
US Army’s labs at Fort Detrick that conceived the project to determine the military
usefulness of the bacteria for Tularemia. This was one of the nastier projects
conducted by the US military. The attraction was that infected persons generally
become long-term medical cases since convalescence is slow and may extend to
as long as a year, putting enormous strain on an enemy’s resources and medical
facilities and effectively removing all infected troops from possible
combat. Moreover, the mortality rate can be as high as 40%.

2.5. Some Notable Experiments

From 1989 to 1991, Kaiser Permanente and the CDC jointly conducted a secret
measles vaccine experiment on poor and black children in Los Angeles. The high-
potency experimental vaccine had been previously tested on infants in Mexico, Haiti, and
Africa, but was discontinued when it was discovered that the children were dying in large
numbers. The vaccine had never been licensed for use in the US, and the CDC later
admitted the parents were never informed their children were being injected with
an experimental vaccine that was potentially fatal. The CDC and FDA refused to
release the raw data on the results of these experiments. [88]

Then we have the famous Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment conducted by the US Public
Health Service and the CDC in which researchers collected about 600 black men, most of
whom apparently were already infected with syphilis though none were aware of the
fact. [89] [90] [91] Even after penicillin became known as a proven cure, the men were
never informed of their diagnosis, and were not only discouraged from, but coerced against,
seeking treatment that was freely available elsewhere. The reason was that they wanted
to track the progress of the disease from inception to death, and treatment would have
rendered the experiment useless. All the participants died. [92] [93]

In another case, as part of Operation LAC, [94] the US Army for many years sprayed toxic
chemicals that included zinc cadmium sulfide over a large number of cities in both the US
and Canada, in order to test dispersal patterns of chemical weapons. The US military
mounted sprayers on rooftops and vehicles, and on low-flying aircraft, and proceeded to
spray an entire section of downtown St. Louis and “at least” 33 other cities including
some in Canada. The residents were told these were tests of a kind of “smoke
screen” that could protect the residents if the Russians attacked. The US military
managed to keep the secret hidden for more than 40 years before the facts leaked out.
The public were never notified, and the cause of enormous number of respiratory and other
illnesses was never publicly identified. The areas that were sprayed – and sprayed heavily
– were densely-populated poor areas with about 10,000 residents each, probably
75% of whom were children. In some families, all members succumbed to cancer within
a short time, and there were high rates of cancer in the sprayed areas of all cities but,
since no records were maintained and no follow-ups ever performed, there is now no way
to know the total number of cancers and deaths that resulted. [95] [96] [97] [98]
39
From 1948 to 1975, and possibly much later, the US Army Chemical Corps conducted a
long series of top-secret classified human research at the Edgewood Arsenal in the US
military’s Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. [99] [100] The stated purpose was to
evaluate the effect of chemical warfare agents and to test protective clothing, but even a
cursory examination of the facts leads only to a conclusion that this was full-fledged
biowarfare experimentation and testing program. And in fact, a portion of the tests
involved psychochemical warfare which was driven by perceived need for new interrogation
techniques, as evidenced by a 1949 classified report by L. Wilson Greene, Edgewood’s
‘scientific director’, titled “Psychochemical Warfare: A New Concept of War”. [101] The
original report appears unavailable, but we have some references to it.

This entire decades-long effort was referred to as the Medical Research Volunteer Program.
According to the records, more than 7,000 military servicemen and more than 1,000
civilians were involved in the program and were exposed to more than 250 different
chemicals and biological agents. Many of the toxins tested were deadly, such as the nerve
agents VX and Sarin. According to government documents and class action lawsuits, the
“volunteers” were subjected not only to Sarin and VX nerve gases, and various
hallucinogens like LSD, mescaline and PCP, but to other psychoactive agents, tear
gas, mustard gas, CS gas, BZ, anthrax, botulism, plague, tularemia, Q fever,
dioxins, various pesticides and many other compounds. These experiments are
described in detail in a previous article “The US government declares war on
America, Part 2. [102]

This one is perhaps my favorite: Dugway – Dead Sheep and Soviet Trickery

Source
40
March of 1968 experienced one of the more famous events at the Dugway Proving Ground
when a military aircraft released several thousand pounds of VX nerve gas into a large and
inhabited area, and the next day 6,000 sheep were dead. And not only
sheep. [103] [104] [105] One survivor, a man named Ray Peck, told the news that very
soon after, a military helicopter landed in his yard, “disgorging officials who collected dead
wildlife and performed blood tests on his frightened family”. He claimed that all family
members soon began experiencing violent headaches, numbness, burning
feelings, psychological loss of control, skin cancers and heart problems. A flood
of miscarriages also occurred in area families immediately after this test. A military
report that remained classified and buried for more than 30 years was finally obtained and
made public by the Salt Lake Tribune. The report stated that the evidence was
“incontrovertible” that the US military’s VX nerve gas was responsible for the sheep kill and
the human conditions as well, but even with this, the military refused to admit negligence
or to accept responsibility for the event. [106] [107] [108]

One of the serious problems in researching and documenting events such as these is that
there exists a veritable army of individuals, many financed by the military or various of the
sociopathic “Think Tanks” but others of indeterminate provenance, all of whom appear
desperately determined to discredit the revelations of these atrocities. One such person is
a Dr. Steven J. Allen, an apparent editor of something called the Capital Research
Center – which receives funding from the Koch Brothers – and which is all you need
to know. This so-called independent research center became famous some years back
for its published “studies” condemning anti-tobacco lobbyists when it was
revealed that substantial funding had been received from tobacco companies.

In any case, our Dr. Allen, who appears to be an expert on almost everything, wrote an
article on the US military’s VX nerve gas sheep-kill adventure, titled “Nerve gas, six
thousand dead sheep, and Soviet trickery”. [109] To say he was desperately
determined to exonerate the military is a bit of an understatement since he produced at
least one monograph of about 50 pages to deal with an event that required a few
paragraphs at best. Mostly, he attributed the “totally false” accusations against the
US military to “muckraking journalists”, to various civilian criminals disguising their
sins by blaming the US military, and to various other well-meaning but incompetent
individuals. As one example, he noted that “A government official connected with the
(biological weapons) program stated that after the VX nerve gas test the “roadsides were
just covered with carcasses”, but dismissed this testimony as he did with others by stating
that the man “wasn’t a scientist”. We are therefore to conclude that only ‘scientists’, by Dr.
Allen’s definition, are competent to notice large numbers of dead animals littering a
roadside.

The best part of Allen’s dissertation was his conviction that only the Russians had
anything to gain by blaming a massive sheep kill on the US military, claiming that
a couple of Russian saboteurs equipped with simple tools they could acquire on
the local American market could have pulled off the entire sheep episode – and in
fact did so. The benefit to the Russians, of course, would be that “the nationwide outburst
of protest” (about the dead sheep) “shocked President Richard Nixon into putting a hold on
the entire U.S. chemical weapons program”, leaving only the Russians with this military
advantage. So, in Allen’s delusional world, two Russians brought into the US
several thousand pounds of VX nerve gas (or purchased it at the local 7-11), then
distributed it over a few thousand square kilometers, perhaps using water pistols,
41
killed all the sheep (and people) while magically escaping contamination
themselves, then caught the next plane to Moscow. All without being detected.

Allen informs us that if US military involvement had been “at all plausible”, the
Army “would have accepted responsibility in a timely manner”. And of course, we
all know that to be true since neither the US government, the US military, nor the CIA have
ever, ever denied their involvement in anything. Yes, that’s sarcasm. Unfortunately, our
Dr. Allen is only one of a great many individuals who feverishly pounce on any and all
revelations of US government misconduct and do their best to confuse, obfuscate,
overwhelm with irrelevancies, and otherwise contaminate the historical record for the sole
purpose of misleading the public. The mass media generally fall into this category,
seldom engaging in what we used to call investigative journalism and instead
most often producing overt propaganda to parrot the official – and generally
unbelievable – story.

NOTES

[1] The US Government Declares War on America

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10750/

[2] The US Government Declares War on America: Biological, Chemical, and Radiation “Experiments”
on Americans
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/04/the-us-government-declares-war-on.html

[3] US Army Has Admitted To Conducting 100s Of Germ Warfare Tests On Americans – image source
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/biowarfare/us-army-has-admitted-to-conducting-100s-
of-germ-warfare-tests-on-americans/

[4] Secret Government Experiments On The American People

https://www.whiteoutpress.com/secret-government-experiments-on-the-american-people/

42
[5] Over and over again, the military has conducted dangerous biowarfare experiments on Americans
https://www.businessinsider.com/military-government-secret-experiments-biological-chemical-
weapons-2016-9

[6] Of Microbes and Mock Attacks: Years Ago, The Military Sprayed Germs on U.S. Cities
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1003703226697496080

[7] Hidden history of US germ testing

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/file_on_4/4701196.stm

[8] Hotel Anthrax

https://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/hotelanthrax/

[9] Governments and Biowarfare: A Brief History

https://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20090501_biowarfare_history.htm

[10] In the Name of Science: A History of Secret Programs, Medical Research, and Human
Experimentation
https://www.amazon.com/Name-Science-Programs-Research-Experimentation/dp/0312303564

[11] Andrew Goliszek “In the Name of Science”

https://archive.org/details/innameofscienceh0000goli

[12] In the Name of Science by Andrew Goliszek

https://www.salon.com/2004/01/08/goliszek/

[13] 1994: Senate VA Committee Hearing: Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health?
https://ahrp.org/1994-staff-report-by-the-senate-committee-on-veterans-affairs/

[14] IS MILITARY RESEARCH HAZARDOUS TO VETERANS’ HEALTH? LESSONS SPANNING

HALF A CENTURY
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/103d_congress.html

[15] Human Experimentation An Overview on Co1d War Era Programs

https://www.gao.gov/assets/t-nsiad-94-266.pdf

[16] Operation Whitecoat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Whitecoat

[17] Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare;

https://repository.netecweb.org/items/show/325

[18] Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare

https://archive.org/details/BioBook4

[19] US Army Has Admitted To Conducting 100s Of Germ Warfare Tests On Americans
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/biowarfare/us-army-has-admitted-to-conducting-100s-
of-germ-warfare-tests-on-americans/

[20] Secret Government Experiments On The American People

https://www.whiteoutpress.com/secret-government-experiments-on-the-american-people/

[21] Over and over again, the military has conducted dangerous biowarfare experiments on Americans
https://www.businessinsider.com/military-government-secret-experiments-biological-chemical-
weapons-2016-9

[22] Serratia has dark history in region / Army test in 1950 may have changed microbial ecology
https://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Serratia-has-dark-history-in-region-Army-test-2677623.php

43
[23] Navy Fogged Bay Area With Bacteria
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/09/17/navy-fogged-bay-area-with-
bacteria/cee3e0eb-7504-44d4-b89e-0c801152a324/

[24] In 1950, the U.S. Released a Bioweapon in San Francisco

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1950-us-released-bioweapon-san-francisco-
180955819/

[25] Project 112

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_112

[26] About Project 112 and Project SHAD

https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/shad/basics.asp

[27] Operation Dew

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dew

[28] Operation LAC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_LAC

[29] Project SHAD

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_SHAD

[30] Exposure through Project 112 or Project SHAD

https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/project-112-shad/

[31] Outdoor Mosquito Biting Activities – Project Bellwether

https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0596046.pdf

[32] Opening up Dugway Proving Grounds, the military’s secretive biological weapon testing unit
https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2016/jan/27/look-inside-archives-dugway-proving-
grounds-milita/

[33] Operation Magic Sword

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Magic_Sword

[34] THE UNTOLD HISTORY OF INSECT WARFARE

https://www.grunge.com/713342/the-untold-history-of-insect-warfare/

[35] We Have Met the Enemy And They Are Small – A Brief History of Bug Warfare
https://militaryhistorynow.com/2014/02/06/we-have-met-the-enemy-and-they-are-small-a-brief-
history-of-bug-warfare/

[36] Florida mosquitoes: 750 million genetically modified insects to be released

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53856776

[37] a U.S. Company Plans to Release 2.4 Billion Genetically Modified Mosquitoes
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-the-us-plans-to-release-24-billion-genetically-
modified-mosquitoes-180979833/

[38] Thousands of genetically modified mosquitoes being released in Florida

https://nypost.com/2021/04/27/genetically-modified-mosquitoes-being-released-in-florida/

[39] First-ever US release of genetically modified mosquitoes begins in Florida Keys

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/30/health/genetically-modified-mosquitoes-us-scn-
wellness/index.html

[40] COVID Vaccinations and Oxitec’s “Flying Syringes”

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/6756/
44
[41] Insect Allies (Archived)
https://www.darpa.mil/program/insect-allies

[42] Crop-protecting insects could be turned into bioweapons, critics warn

https://www.science.org/content/article/crop-protecting-insects-could-be-turned-bioweapons-critics-
warn

[43] Attack Of The Killer Mosquitoes

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/attack-killer-mosquitoes-0

[44] Operation May Day

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_May_Day

[45] Operation Drop Kick

https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Operation_Drop_Kick

[46] Operation Drop Kick

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Drop_Kick

[47] How The U.S. Government Used Mosquitos To Secretly Experiment On Its Citizens
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/how-the-u-s-government-used-mosquitos-to-secretly-
experiment-on-its-citizens/ar-AA17WoWK

[48] Summary of Major Events and Problems – US Army Chemical Corps fiscal year 1959
https://archive.org/details/declassified-document-detailing-operation-drop-kick-and-big-buzz

[49] Summary of Major Events and Problems

https://ia801501.us.archive.org/20/items/declassified-document-detailing-operation-drop-kick-and-
big-
buzz/Declassified%20document%20detailing%20Operation%20Drop%20Kick%20and%20Big%20Bu
zz.pdf

[50] COVID Vaccinations and Oxitec’s “Flying Syringes”

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai

[51] Blacks in Savannah haunted by memory of infamous mosquito experiment

https://eu.savannahnow.com/story/news/2021/02/04/big-buzz-mosquito-experiment-savannah-
blacks-distrust-covid-vaccine-tuskegee-fear/4314322001/

[52] Swarms of mosquitoes, the type notorious for transmitting yellow…

https://www.upi.com/Archives/1980/10/29/Swarms-of-mosquitoes-the-type-notorious-for-
transmitting-yellow/5266341643600/

[53] Operation Big Buzz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Big_Buzz

[54] How The U.S. Government Used Mosquitos To Secretly Experiment On Its Citizens
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/how-the-u-s-government-used-mosquitos-to-secretly-
experiment-on-its-citizens/ar-AA17WoWK

[55] OPERATION BIG ITCH AND OPERATION DROP KICK: FLEAS AND INFECTED MOSQUITOES
DROPPED OVER BLACK TOWNS
https://blackthen.com/operation-big-itch-operation-drop-kick-fleas-infected-mosquitoes-dropped-
black-towns/

[56] Operation Big Itch

https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Operation_Big_Itch

45
[57] Operation Big Itch
https://www.liquisearch.com/operation_big_itch/operation#:~:text=Operation%20Big%20Itch%20w
as%20a%20September%201954%20series,trials%20were%20not%20infected%20by%20any%20biolo
gical%20agent.

[58] Using the Flea as a Weapon

https://web.archive.org/web/20070611071747/http://www.wood.army.mil/chmdsd/pdfs/Jul-
Dec%202005/Kirby.pdf

[59] Redacted government document: DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, U.S. ARMY
DUGWAY PROVING GROUND
http://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/biological/bigitch.pdf

[60] Operation LAC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_LAC

[61] Operation Top Hat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Top_Hat

[62] Moreno Jonathan D Undue Risk: Secret State Experiments on Humans

https://ia801606.us.archive.org/34/items/moreno-jonathan-d-undue-risk-sec/Moreno-Jonathan-D-
Undue-Risk-Sec.pdf

[63] Veterans at Risk: The Health Effects of Mustard Gas and Lewisite
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 1993. Veterans at Risk: The Health Effects
of Mustard Gas and Lewisite. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
https://doi.org/10.17226/2058.
https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/2058/chapter/21

[64] Project 112

https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Project_112

[65] ПРОЕКТ 112: ТЕСТИРОВАНИЕ ХИМИЧЕСКОГО И БИОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ОРУЖИЯ НА

ГРАЖДАНАХ США
http://lllolll.ru/project112/

[66] Обо всем на свете: Проект 112

https://teletype.in/@shpili-vili/ryCdv2xhV

[67] DoD Tested Weapons On Thousands

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dod-tested-weapons-on-thousands/

[68] TX Anticrop Agent & Project 112

https://rockymountainarsenalarchive.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/tx-anticrop-agent-project-112/

[69] Operation Dew

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dew

[70] Operation Sea-Spray

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray

[71] Blood & Fog: The Military’s Germ Warfare Tests in San Francisco
https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/blood-and-fog-the-militarys-germ-warfare-tests-in-san-
francisco

[72] Serratia has dark history in region / Army test in 1950 may have changed microbial ecology
https://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Serratia-has-dark-history-in-region-Army-test-2677623.php

46
[73] Navy Fogged Bay Area With Bacteria
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/09/17/navy-fogged-bay-area-with-
bacteria/cee3e0eb-7504-44d4-b89e-0c801152a324/

[74] In 1950, the U.S. Released a Bioweapon in San Francisco

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/1950-us-released-bioweapon-san-francisco-
180955819/

[75] CIA May Have Tested Biological Warfare in New York in ’50s, Church Says
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/12/04/cia-may-have-tested-biological-
warfare-in-new-york-in-50s-church-says/0872f274-58c6-4184-bde3-50d1ecef0573/

[76] Operation Big City

https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Operation+Big+City#:~:text=An%20ambitious%20proje
ct%20was%20conducted%20in%201957%20when,properties%20of%20the%20substance%20would%
20affect%20the%20population.

[77] Operation Big City – Biological Weapons Testing On U.S Citizens

ttps://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread648567/pg1

[78] Operation Big City

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s0FxCYwkFg

[79] Operation Big City Top-Secret Bioweapons Testing- NEWYORK 1956

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HIfP0-TC94

[80] Operation Dark Winter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dark_Winter

[81] Shining Light on “Dark Winter”

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/34/7/972/316999?login=true

[82] Two decades of pandemic war games failed to account for Donald Trump
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02277-6

[83] America’s Pandemic War Games Don’t End Well

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/01/coronavirus-pandemic-war-games-simulation-dark-winter/

[84] Operation Whitecoat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Whitecoat

[85] Operation Whitecoat

https://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/2003/10/24/october-24-2003-operation-
whitecoat/15055/

[86] The Military’s Medical Heroes

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/2003/10/09/the-militarys-medical-
heroes/411e62dd-f208-4bb2-b2c1-898c2f4d013b/

[87] Operation Polka Dot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Polka_Dot

[88] CDC Says It Erred in Measles Study

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-06-17-mn-15871-story.html

[89] The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

https://allthatsinteresting.com/human-experiments/4

47
[90] The Syphilis Study at Tuskegee Timeline
https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm

[91] Tuskegee Experiment: The Infamous Syphilis Study

https://www.history.com/news/the-infamous-40-year-tuskegee-study

[92] The Tuskegee Syphilis Study

https://onlineethics.org/cases/ethics-science-classroom/tuskegee-syphilis-study

[93] Tuskegee Syphilis Study

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study

[94] Operation LAC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_LAC

[95] U.S. Performed Radiation Experiments On Its Own Citizens, New Book Reveals
https://allthatsinteresting.com/us-government-radiation

[96] Army’s secret chemical testing in St. Louis neighborhoods during Cold War raising new concerns
https://www.foxnews.com/us/armys-secret-chemical-testing-in-st-louis-neighborhoods-during-cold-
war-raising-new-concerns

[97] The Army Sprayed St. Louis With Toxic Aerosol During A Just Revealed 1950s Test
https://www.businessinsider.com/army-sprayed-st-louis-with-toxic-dust-2012-10?r=US&IR=T

[98] Suit filed over government test-spraying in St. Louis during cold war
https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/suit-filed-over-government-test-spraying-in-st-louis-
during-cold-war/article_9bc1fc7d-7093-58a3-b557-0cbac5dc38ab.html

[99] Edgewood Arsenal human experiments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgewood_Arsenal_human_experiments

[100] Edgewood Arsenal human experiments

https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Edgewood_Arsenal_human_experiments

[101] Wilson Greene, “Psychochemical Warfare: A New Concept of War”; Operation Delirium
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/12/17/operation-delirium

[102] The US Government Declares War on America — Part 2 — Biological Warfare

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10791/

[103] Dugway sheep incident

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dugway_sheep_incident

[104] How the Death of 6,000 Sheep Spurred the American Debate on Chemical Weapons
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-death-6000-sheep-spurred-american-debate-
chemical-weapons-cold-war-180968717/

[105] The Skull Valley Sheep Kill

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csvtv3

[106] TESTING BY DUGWAY KILLED SHEEP

https://www.deseret.com/1992/6/30/18991954/testing-by-dugway-killed-sheep

[107] Nerve gas at Dugway

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dugway_sheep_incident

48
[108] Dead Sheep at Dugway.
http://capitalresearch.org/2014/03/a-mighty-wind-nerve-gas-six-thousand-dead-sheep-and-soviet-
trickery/

[109] Dr. Steven J. Allen; “Nerve gas, six thousand dead sheep, and Soviet trickery”
https://capitalresearch.org/article/a-mighty-wind-nerve-gas-six-thousand-dead-sheep-and-soviet-
trickery/

49
3.1. Identifying Biological Warfare Attacks

3.2. Project Bacchus – A Conspiracy Theory for you

3.3. Suspicious Outbreaks

50
3.1. Identifying Biological Warfare Attacks

We are in the middle of a world-changing war. This is no ordinary war, however. Most of the
victims of this warfare aren’t even able to identify it as war, nor do they understand
that
they are combatants in it. It’s called fifth-generation warfare. Source

In reading the following examples, I would ask that you keep in mind the treatise
by Leonard Horowitz and Zygmunt Dembek on the common signs used to identify a
bio-warfare agent:

1. Disease caused by an unusual, rare, or uncommon pathogen, or an unusual strain

of a common pathogen, indicating it was potentially genetically engineered

2. Lack of an epidemiological explanation, i.e., no clear idea of source or origin

3. Unusual presentation or manifestation of the disease, i.e., race-specific

4. Unusual geographic or seasonal distribution

5. Multiple epidemics. Simultaneous outbreaks at different locations with the same

organism

6. Reverse or simultaneous spread. Diseases typically occur first among a susceptible

animal population, then spread to humans. If these two are simultaneous or if the human
disease precedes animal infections, we can be suspicious;

51
According to the brief description above, there are a few recent disease outbreaks that
would seem to properly qualify as potential bio-warfare agents. The first that come to mind
are AIDS, SARS, MERS, US Bird Flu, US Swine Flu, China bird flu. China swine flu,
Hantavirus, Lyme Disease, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Polio, Foot and Mouth Disease,
the Gulf War Syndrome, and ZIKA. And COVID, if you’re inclined to think that way.

3.2. Project Bacchus – A Conspiracy Theory for you

No listing such as this would be complete without a good conspiracy theory, and we are
fortunate to have one. For background, Project Bacchus was an exceptionally secret
project by the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency intended to see if it were possible
to construct a biowarfare facility – specifically to produce anthrax – “in a foreign country”,
using off-the-shelf equipment and doing so without arousing suspicion or being discovered.
It seemed obvious the CIA wanted to produce such facilities in foreign countries and
disperse the anthrax, leaving the local government without a clue as to how it happened.
However, the “official story” was that this was an attempt to learn if foreign terrorists on
US soil might be able to accomplish such an effort. But, if this were really the case, there
would have been no need for the extreme secrecy. [110] [111]

In any case, the “scientists” did manage to find an abandoned building where they could
work without scrutiny, and they did manage to build their mini anthrax factory and produce
several kilograms of anthrax. Part of what turns this story into a conspiracy theory is all
the inconsistencies in the story, and how the official narrative changed with each new
discovery and revelation of details. Part of the initial story was that the scientists produced
not a biological pathogen but merely a few kilograms of a harmless pesticide. [112]

[121]

52
The project was discovered and revealed by New York Times reporters Judith Miller,
Stephen Engelberg and William J. Broad. [113] Shortly after this, they published a book
containing further details. The book, Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret
War that also covered Bacchus’ two sister projects, Clear
Vision [114] and Jefferson, [115] which also came to light at about the same time.
The book attracted much attention. [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] It is available for
download on archive.org. [121]

This is where things become interesting. First, the original stated purpose would have
to be fraudulent – the idea that “foreign terrorists” might be able to enter the US,
build an anthrax factory, and distribute the pathogen among the population. It might as
well be stated bluntly that a few disaffected Uzbeks with AK-47s and big ambitions might
well be able to enter the US, find a suitable location, and maybe construct something, but
how would they obtain the seed anthrax needed to begin production? You can’t
make anthrax from sunshine and dandelions; you need the actual pathogen. Can you
picture foreign terrorists walking into Fort Detrick and saying, “Good morning. We would
like to buy a few pounds of anthrax, please.”? On the other hand, if they brought the
seed anthrax with them, they would have no need to build a factory, would
they? They needed only enough to mail a few letters. And if all I want to do is to poison
a few US senators and the Editors of the New York Times, why not just mail the
letters from whatever country I’m in? Why go to all the trouble and expense of coming
to the US and building a factory for something I can conveniently do from my home in
Geneva? And with much less risk. The original stated purpose may appear
superficially plausible, but, with a bit of thought, the entire idea is ridiculous.

Project Bacchus ran in 1999 and 2000, and news of it escaped confinement and
was revealed to the public on September 4, 2001. It was only a few days later that a
series of letters containing anthrax spores were sent through the mail to various locations
in the US, addressed to two senators, several news media offices, and various other public
locations. The attacks resulted in five deaths, 17 illnesses and a nationwide scare.

Dr. Stephen Hatfill. Scientist Is Paid Millions by U.S. in Anthrax Suit. Source

53
Naturally, the FBI launched an investigation into the attacks, which apparently became one
of the largest and most complex investigations in the agency’s history. After a lengthy
investigation, The FBI concluded that Dr. Stephen Hatfill, an American physician and
biological weapons expert, was the sole culprit who perpetrated the attacks. He became
the subject of extensive media coverage, he lost his job, his home was repeatedly
raided, his phone tapped, he was apparently under surveillance for years. In 2008,
after seven years of harassment, the government officially exonerated Hatfill of any
involvement in the anthrax attacks and settled with a $5.8 million payment. [122] [123] It
should be noted that the courts railed against the FBI for their incompetent and
malicious investigation, saying that no one should have been subjected to such an
obvious personal atrocity for seven years.

Dr. Bruce E. Ivins at work in the laboratory in 2001. Source

Having failed with Hatfield, the FBI then decided the culprit was Bruce E. Ivins, a scientist
at AMRIID, the Fort Detrick source of all the highly-weaponised anthrax in the US. However,
Ivins conveniently committed suicide before the FBI had a chance to prove their case or to
indict him. [124] The “overdose of pain killers” is not as good as MOSSAD’s “surprise heart
attack”, but we must work with whatever tools we have available. I should note here
that apparent suicides are much too plentiful in the US whenever such an event
would be politically expedient. Think of Gary Webb, who was about to reveal evidence
54
connecting the CIA to extensive cocaine-dealing in the US, and who conveniently
“committed suicide” a day before he was to reveal his evidence – the only man in history
to have committed suicide by shooting himself in the head twice. Or think of Steve
Kangas, or Karen Silkwood. Or, for variety, think of Pat Tillman who was accidentally
killed by “friendly fire” in Afghanistan. We don’t normally think of “friendly fire” as including
three closely-grouped shots to the forehead at close range, but then this is America and
maybe things are different here. [125]

The FBI investigators claim to have concluded that Ivins had the means, motive, and
opportunity to carry out the attacks, had been in possession of the various strains of
anthrax used in the letters, and had a grudge against the United States government. But
immediately, various scientists and media reporters dismissed the FBI claims against Ivins,
stating they were not only inconclusive but possibly fraudulent. [126] [127] To make
matters even more interesting, “it was determined that the spores in the letters were
derived from a batch of the Ames strain of anthrax that had been created and
maintained at USAMRIID”. Now we know where the “terrorists” obtained their
seed anthrax for their factory.

Then, to assist in the “post-mortem” investigation, the FBI and the CDC gave
permission to destroy the Iowa anthrax archive. This was not only described as
“an enormous surprise”, but it served to make further investigation impossible
since the crucial evidence had been destroyed. Of course, the case was then never
solved. What a surprise.

The media and many people connected the anthrax attacks with 9/11, which served
immeasurably to smoke up the room. However, a few others who were paying attention,
made different connections. First, the actual scheme seems to have been an experiment to
determine (1) if a small anthrax lab could be built in absolute secrecy, but more importantly
(2) to disperse that pathogen and determine whether it could be traced back to that secret
lab, or to Fort Detrick or Dugway where the seed originated. And that would require, despite
the exposure by the New York Times reporters, the “terrorists” to still distribute those
anthrax letters and see if the secrecy would hold. However, the public exposure of the plot
required a change in plans – to find someone to blame. Thus, Hatfill and Ivins were
chosen as the sacrificial lambs to take away the focus from the CIA and/or
military – and Project Bacchus. And, for seven years, it seems to have accomplished
precisely that: everyone forgot about the CIA and their mini-anthrax lab, and focused on
two innocent men until the story was old news and no one cared any more. And the
“suicide” provided closure to the story.

The conspiracy conclusion of course is that the CIA not only manufactured the anthrax but
also distributed it through the letters. In case you are tempted to say, “They would
never do that”, there is no shortage of real examples of the US government (and
other governments) deliberately staging terrorist activities to further political
aims. Think of Operation Gladio the US sponsored in Europe, causing multiple terrorist
attacks, and killing a great many people, simply to frighten European populations into
electing Right-Wing governments. [128] This is real, and there are many other such

55
examples. You may recall Operation Northwoods, [129] where the CIA wanted to
fill an American airliner with college students on holiday, send the aircraft off-
course near Cuba, shoot it down, then use that as an excuse to declare war on
Cuba. It was only President Kennedy’s infuriation that prevented this from actually taking
place. The US military, the CIA, and the US government establishment itself, have never
had much hesitation in killing American civilians or anyone else if a desired political aim
could be thereby achieved. That’s reality, and you have to live with it. I don’t know the
truth of this, but it is certainly the kind of thing the US military and CIA would do, proven
by the fact that they have done similar things on many occasions.

As further proof, let me remind you of the callous and obscene nature which has always
pervaded the US government: Kodak’s discovery of radiation:

Source

Kodak began receiving customer complaints about fogged film, the cause of which was
quickly traced to corn husks from Indiana that Kodak used as packaging material for its
film. A Kodak physicist discovered that all corn husks were heavily contaminated with
radioactivity. After this, the US government agreed to secretly provide Kodak with advance
information on all future nuclear tests, including “expected distribution of radioactive
material in order to anticipate local contamination”. Unfortunately, the population were not
provided with the same ‘advance notification’ as were Kodak’s corn husks, the people not
being relevant to corporate profits. The victims now tell us, “In fact, the Government
warned the entire photographic industry and provided maps and forecasts of potential
contamination. Where, I ask, were the maps for dairy farmers? Where were the
56
warnings to parents of children in these areas? The Government protected rolls
of film, but not the lives of our kids. Why did they do that when they had all the
information about hot spots and fallout, and yet they did not warn the people of this country
about the dangers inherent in radioactive fallout? Why has the government withheld
information until now?” It is reprehensible that our citizens were intentionally exposed to
radioactivity and yet those who knew remained silent – even in the face of evidence that
said if we provided treatment and information early, we might alleviate suffering or prevent
diseases.” We really must pity these Americans who, despite the overwhelming
evidence, cannot bring themselves to accept the truth that their government
didn’t inform them of the radioactivity because they were the guinea pigs in the
tests. The painful deaths of those millions of children were not accidents from
above-ground nuclear tests; they were the purpose of the tests. [130]

Nevertheless, this is a good conspiracy theory. You decide.

3.3. Suspicious Outbreaks

3.3.1. Hantavirus

The Ptinus fur beetle, also known as the Whitemarked Spider Beetle, alleged to be used as an insect
vector for delivery of anthrax spores during the Korean War (picture from the report of
International Scientific Commission, 1952). This Source provides shocking details and facts about
the U.S. biological warfare campaign undertaken during the Korean War, and in particular, the use
of anthrax as a biological weapon against China, which had entered the Korean War in late 1950.

In mid-1993, a strange disease emerged in the US, the infections concentrated in a four-
state area. In this case, the virus appeared to attack only native Indians who developed
sudden respiratory problems and were often dead within hours. [131] Most victims
57
reported “not feeling well” one day, and were dead the next, from what appeared as a very
mysterious pathogen with an undeterminable source. “In his 30-plus years as a doctor,
Bruce Tempest had never seen anything like it. A Navajo man having trouble breathing
showed up at the emergency room of a small hospital in Gallup, N.M. Less than an hour
later, he was dead. The man had been young, athletic and otherwise healthy. His fiancee
had died days before, also from sudden breathing problems. Tempest remembers
thinking “This is something different. It just doesn’t fit”.”

Then on September 10, 2012, the Los Angeles Times ran an article discussing the topic of
doctors “still trying to diagnose mysteries of the Hantavirus” more than 20 years after this
deadly pathogen was first identified in the US in 1993. [132] But then, “a lucky clue”
arose from a television viewer, a physician who stated this illness seemed very
similar to that caused by a virus he had observed the US military using in Korea
in the 1950s. And sure enough, tests proved the illness to be caused by a variation of the
same Hantavirus that attacked troops in Korea. The virus attracted attention because some
American troops were accidentally exposed to it in Korea, most of whom died very
suddenly. Two facts that were eliminated from the public reports of the time: (1) the virus
attacked North Koreans and Chinese in greater numbers, and (2) this Hantavirus
was one item in the treasure trove of biological weapons the Americans inherited
from Dr. Ishii and his Unit 731. The Japanese were light-years ahead of the Americans
and the Western Allies in virus research and had isolated the lethal Hantavirus by the late
1930s, with much evidence it was used against China by the Japanese and later against
both China and North Korea by the Americans. It seems that some of this weaponised
material escaped containment and exposed American and South Korean soldiers to their
own handiwork.

Now think about this in terms of the common signs used to identify a bio-warfare agent:

1. Disease caused by an unusual, rare, or uncommon pathogen, or an unusual

strain of a common pathogen, indicating it was potentially genetically engineered. Check.
Unusual and rare indeed. And nearly identical to the strain the US used in Korea, except
that this variety attacked the respiratory system instead of the renal system.

2. Lack of an epidemiological explanation. i.e., no clear idea of source or origin.

Check. This virus seemed to come from nowhere, and no source was identified, nor was a
patient zero.

3. Unusual presentation or manifestation of the disease, i.e., race-specific. Check.

There were no reports of the virus attacking anyone other than native aboriginals, leading
to speculation the US military had isolated certain genes in natives that made them
susceptible to a particular strain of this virus, and then produced it.

4. Unusual geographic or seasonal distribution. Check. The virus appeared only an

the confluence of four states, an area heavily populated with natives.

5. Multiple epidemics. Simultaneous outbreaks at different locations with the same

organism. Check. The virus appeared in different locations at the same time. and then
spread

58
6. Reverse or simultaneous spread. Diseases typically occur first among a susceptible
animal population, then spread to humans. If these two are simultaneous or if the human
disease precedes animal infections, we can be suspicious. Check. No animal source.

In 2006, a disingenuous apologist named Robert Neff wrote an article stating that “a few
members of the United Nations forces” in Korea fell ill from a mysterious disease.
(Note that the partitioning of, and genocide in, North Korea is now attributed to ‘the United
Nations’ rather than US meddling.) Mr. Neff does admit the disease that struck his “United
Nations forces” did indeed resemble the hemorrhagic fever which the Japanese “had
encountered” in Manchuria. It’s hardly a surprise the Japanese “encountered” it,
since they created it. But Mr. Neff, in his rush to exonerate the US from culpability, fails
to make the obvious connection that was made by every other medical researcher – namely
that from all the facts on the ground, it appears that the US put to almost immediate use
Ishii’s weaponisation of the hantavirus. Many reputable medical researchers have
stated this disease did not originate in Korea but was introduced by the Americans
as a biological weapon.

Back to the outbreak in the US in 1993 that appeared to affect only North American
aboriginals: Barbara Knust, a CDC epidemiologist, said, “The biggest mystery is we
don’t have a good explanation [as to the cause].” I have an explanation. All she
needs to do is ask.

3.3.2. Lyme Disease

[133]

59
In 2004, Michael C. Carroll published a book titled, “Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of
the Government’s Secret Plum Island Germ Laboratory”. Amazon carries two
versions of the book, the original, [133] and an update. [134] The book is available to
read on archive.org. [135] Plum Island is located off the coast of Long Island, New York,
and is the US military’s main repository for some of the world’s most dangerous animal
pathogens being researched for use as bio-warfare materials. It was first a military base,
then turned into a government animal disease laboratory operated by the US Department
of Agriculture, then transferred to the Department of Homeland Security where it still
resides – [136] [137] and we should ask ourselves why Homeland Security is
operating BSL-4 animal pathogen labs instead of terrorising American citizens by
its more usual methods.

Lyme disease has a gradual onset, often with flu-like symptoms. Individual can have unexplained
fevers or hot and cold spells. Memory, planning, reading, brain processing, and judgment may be
impaired. Fatigue and exhaustion are common as well as sleep problems and
headaches. Sensitivity to light and sounds is increased so people can feel assaulted by
the world around them. Source.

Our main current interest in Plum Island relates to an outbreak of Lyme

disease, [138] [139] which many believe originated here since the island is only a few
kilometers from the coast of Lyme, Connecticut, where the disease first appeared in 1970
then exploded around 1975. This is basically a fatal disease, though it kills slowly
and painfully. Our interest in Lyme Disease is primarily because it is a mycoplasma-type
of illness, the specific strain being ‘mycoplasma fermentens’ which is the same strain
that infected the soldiers suffering from the Gulf War Syndrome, both Lyme Disease
victims and Gulf War veterans mostly suffering precisely the same symptoms. “At
a cancer center in Houston, Texas, Dr. Garth Nicholson discovered that many of
those returning soldiers were infected with a genetically-altered strain of
60
Mycoplasma that was clearly man-made and commonly used in the production of
biological weapons.” [140] Not only that, this particular mycoplasma strain was
created at Plum Island, and later patented by the US military (U.S. Patent
5,242,820 issued Sept. 7, 1993). A further connection with Plum Island is that this
mycoplasma is most commonly transmitted through insects – ticks, in this case – which
were the specialties of both Erich Traub and Dr. Ishii’s Unit 731 and entrenched
in Plum Island laboratories.

MSNBC ran an article stating the CDC had admitted Lyme Disease was a biological
weapon, but the page is at times unavailable. [141] This is a quote from the article: US
Government Admits Lyme Disease Is A Bioweapon: “SAN ANTONIO (AP) — The
$10.6 million Margaret Batts Tobin Laboratory Building will provide a 22,000-
square-foot facility to study such diseases as anthrax, tularemia, cholera, lyme
disease, desert valley fever and other parasitic and fungal diseases. The Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention identified these diseases as potential
bioterrorism agents.” [142]

One author noted that Lyme Disease is “an ideal bio-war agent because it evades
detection on routine tests, has an enormous range of different presentations, and
can mimic everything … Enemy medical staff would never know what had hit them, nor
even that ONE illness had hit their population, rather than an unexplained rise in dozens of
known conditions.”

A truly odd condition, even after many years, is that this subject is apparently
forbidden for discussion. The government refuses to discuss the matter, physicians are
apparently afraid to diagnose or treat the illness, and health insurance companies refuse
to cover the treatment, apparently on the basis that the disease doesn’t really exist. These
are precisely the same issues existing with the soldiers suffering from Gulf War
Syndrome: the topic is essentially forbidden, the government and the military
refuse to talk about it or admit its very existence, and insurance companies refuse
to cover “non-existent” illnesses. In keeping with this attitude, medical professionals
who attempt to treat or discuss the issue are harassed and sanctioned,
intimidated into silence.

Barbara Andrews stated in an article in the August 6, 2002 Journal of Degenerative

Diseases, that Plum Island was definitely the source of Lyme Disease, [143] and that the
disease contains the same pathogen (mycoplasma fermentens) found in Gulf War Illness.
More than this, it described “a university-based effort to discourage doctors from
diagnosis and treatment for chronic Lyme Disease and to thwart insurance
coverage” for the disease. Andrews reported the case of a Dr. Joseph Burrascano, who
performed intensive and highly-respected research on Lyme disease and who in 1993
testified before a Senate Committee on the topic. Andrews said Dr. Burrascano risked
his career by stating publicly what others had been afraid to discuss, and by
criticising academics who apparently published flawed and misleading papers to prevent
the real truth from emerging. According to Andrews, Burrascano stated in his
testimony:

61
 “… state health departments have begun to investigate, in a very threatening
way, physicians who [diagnose and treat the disease] … Indeed, I must confess that I feel
I am taking a large risk here today by publicly stating these views, for fear that I may
suffer some negative repercussions, despite the fact that many hundreds of physicians all
over the world agree with what I am saying here.” Burrascano characterised Lyme as
a “political disease” and indeed, he was made an example, charged with professional
misconduct. It took seven years before he was finally exonerated and during that long
ordeal, Dr. Burrascano’s case was watched surreptitiously but carefully by the medical
community.” Andrews noted finally that physicians consider Lyme Disease in the
same way as the Gulf War Syndrome – a “red-flag” illness.

Karl Grossman, a full-time professor of journalism at the State University of New York,
spent five decades investigating the U.S. government laboratory on Plum Island, which is
“shrouded in secrecy.” Grossman was the first journalist who exposed the U.S.
government’s admission to doing biological warfare work on Plum Island in 1971, and is
convinced also this is the source of Lyme disease. [144]

Lastly, I should note that the CIA and US military must have hundreds of people
(at least) working the media to publish huge volumes of irrelevant trivia,
misleading statements, false information, and much more, solely to confuse the
public mind and remove the ability to focus on the main issues. One so-called
“medical paper” claimed that Lyme Disease was not new, that it had been “first documented
as a skin rash in Europe in 1883”. Approaches like this are very clever, but they avoid
discussing how the citizens of Lyme, Connecticut and soldiers in Kuwait ended up
infected with the same strain of mycoplasma that the US government patented,
and that caused “skin rashes” in Europe in 1883″.

The establishment is fighting back in other ways too. With every such event, there are
many people (who are often paid) who write disclaimers and “prove” all doubters are
conspiracy theorists. Tufts University tells us that the “Lyme Bacterium Predates the U.S.
Lab That Conspiracy Theorists Say Unleashed Ticks on Public” [145] And of
course, Snopes is always there to “debunk” the truth. [146] Others disagree: [147] Kris
Newby published “Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological
Weapons” [148] in which he says, “if a scientist named Willy Burgdorfer had not made a
confession in 2013, the secret that Lyme disease came from a biological weapons program
would have died with him”. And Dr. Leonard Horowitz agreed with Patrick Leahy,
Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee investigating this, that the outbreak of Lyme
Disease was a deliberate attack. [148a]

Again, think about this in terms of the common signs used to identify a bio-warfare agent:

62
1.Disease caused by an unusual, rare, or uncommon pathogen, or an unusual
strain of a common pathogen, indicating it was potentially genetically engineered. Yes.
Unusual and rare indeed.

2.Lack of an epidemiological explanation. i.e., no clear idea of source or origin. Yes.

This virus seemed to come from nowhere, and no source was identified, nor was a patient
zero.

3.Unusual presentation or manifestation of the disease, i.e., race-specific. Yes. Lyme

disease infected only people living in Lyme, Connecticut – from where it spread.

4.Unusual geographic or seasonal distribution. Yes. The virus appeared only at the
mainland, a stone’s throw from the Plum Island lab where it had been created and
patented.

5.Multiple epidemics. Not in this case, but the disease is spread by infected ticks,
and weaponising ticks was a specialty at Plum Island.

3.3.3. Mycoplasma – The Gulf War Syndrome

It doesn’t seem well-known, but hundreds of thousands of US troops from the first Gulf
War in Kuwait have suffered from exposure to depleted uranium (DU) shells that were used
against Iraq, resulting in widespread cancers and leukemia, badly-deformed childbirths and
a variety of other illnesses. It is even less well-known that there was a second problem. At
a cancer center in Houston, Texas, Dr. Garth Nicholson discovered that many of
those returning soldiers were infected with a genetically-altered strain of
63
Mycoplasma that was clearly man-made and commonly used in the production of
biological weapons. [149] In spite of this, and other overwhelming evidence, the US
government denied the use of any of these war materials, and refused either
medical treatment or compensation to its soldiers. There appears to be little question
that the severely debilitating illnesses and cancers these men experienced, were a direct
result of this exposure, but the US military denied not only responsibility but the
existence of the disease itself.

US soldiers during the Gulf Wars were forced under federal law to take experimental
vaccines, the law stipulating that soldiers cannot refuse participation in the
military’s medical experiments. Jessica Horjus, a member of the US Air Force, refused
to take an anthrax vaccine before being sent to Kuwait, because the vaccine had
accumulated thousands of reports of adverse reactions ranging from headaches and
vomiting to severe autoimmune and neurological problems. [150] [151] [152] Despite
this and despite four years’ service and commendations and Good Conduct Medals, her
commander demoted her and cut her pay in half. When she refused additional orders
to take the vaccine, she was dishonorably discharged from the US military. Others who
have refused the vaccinations have been imprisoned, and many threatened with
up to 10 years in prison. Soldiers, citizen groups and members of Congress have
demanded that Defense Department officials cease the vaccinations, but to no
avail. The US military is determined to accumulate statistical and biological experience
with its weaponised anthrax, and requires test subjects, both for the disease and for various
treatments or immunisations.

Between 2003 and 2004, 181,000 artillery shells containing depleted uranium were used throughout
Iraq, causing birth defects in a huge number of children. Source

64
One article by a man with the unlikely name of Matt Saintsing tells us the cause was
unexplained until now – until someone discovered it was cause by the nerve gas
Sarin, that Saddam had in storage and that was accidentally released when the US bombed
everything in Iraq. [153] It was such an apparent stroke of luck that a team of researchers
at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School “looked at the genes” and
learned the truth. Dr. Robert Haley, the study’s lead author and director of epidemiology
in the internal medicine department at UT Southwestern said, “Quite simply, our
findings prove that Gulf War illness was caused by sarin, which was released
when we bombed Iraqi chemical weapons storage and production facilities.” He
provides no evidence, but debunking doesn’t require evidence; empty claims are
sufficient. Johns Hopkins wrote an excellent article on the Gulf War Syndrome, but it’s a
bit lacking because they apparently weren’t even aware of the existence of
mycoplasma. [154] The Mayo Clinic unfortunately did a whitewash, claiming
“Psychological and cultural factors undoubtedly contribute” to the Gulf War
illnesses, failing to address the issue of how a “psychological illness” could be
transmitted from the soldiers to their children and transmuted into a mycoplasma
infection. [155]

However, there are a few bright lights despite of the denials. PubMed admits there is a
“High frequency of systemic mycoplasmal infections in Gulf War veterans and
civilians” [156] Researchgate does address this latter issue with an article “Chronic

65
Mycoplasmal Infections in Gulf War Veterans’ Children“, indicating that the disease
not only exists but is contagious and causes autism in children. [157] But you can see the
difficulties in trying to ascertain the truth when the government and military steadfastly
deny even the existence of an illness and respected institutions blame an infection
on mental and emotional disturbances.

Again, if we consider the signs of an engineered pathogen distributed among a

population, the mycoplasma is a good fit. A rare pathogen, clearly man-made, no
apparent source or cause of the outbreak (other than the experimental vaccine),
unusual geographic and human manifestation in that it infected only US soldiers
returning from the Gulf War. And, like Lyme Disease, a determined effort to
silence any discussion of it.

3.3.4. The West Nile Virus

Source

The West Nile virus was yet another new pathogen from Africa that “suddenly
appeared” in the US in 1999, then spread to the West Coast, eventually infecting more
than 30,000 people in most US states. But like Zika and several others, this virus was mild
and appeared to do no great harm in its original location, while in the US the same virus
became a kind of permanent infection apparently causing irreparable nervous
system damage to many victims. That would almost certainly indicate a mutation, either
accidental or derived in a lab, the mutation deciding to occur upon landing in the
US, although it may have made an intermediate stop at the US military’s NAMRU-
2, as did ZIKA.

And, as with Zika, the official story was that this virus had been introduced to North America
by a traveler from Africa or the Middle East, or “via a stray mosquito on an airplane” or,
more commonly, arrived in shipments of automobile tires. But in fact, the US military had
been doing research in the US on the West Nile virus for decades, and it isn’t even a secret
that this virus, along with many other pathogens can be freely purchased from a catalogue
from various US sources, and has been for decades. Hundreds of labs from around the
world make these purchases on a regular basis, the pathogens being openly sold
for medical research, one source being the US National Type Culture Collection in
Rockville, Maryland, very near to the military’s bio-warfare labs at Fort Detrick.
66
According to the ATCC website, they “provide scientists with the biomaterials that
move their research forward”. Their “microbial collections” are of course of high
standard and are “at the heart of incredible breakthroughs in scientific
exploration”. No information on the nature of the breakthroughs, though I must say their
involvement with ZIKA aroused my suspicions. [158] Wikipedia tells us ATCC is a “non-
profit” organisation that “collects and distributes “standard reference
microorganisms” for research and development, and distribute these to more
than 150 countries. [159] Wiki also tells us these people have the largest [micro-
pathology] collection in the world, although I would have thought this honor
would go to either Fort Detrick or the CDC, but they aren’t far from Fort Detrick so
perhaps they collaborate.

It seems that each time a new pathogen appears in the public realm, the official story
involves Africa and travelers or automobile tires, and the compliant media parrot this
nonsense, knowing it is almost certainly false. Even brief research into the US military’s
massive bio-warfare operations would inform interested citizens of the truth of the fact that
killer germs and designer diseases are actively offered for sale in the US, including those
that, like the West Nile virus, are alleged to have “mysteriously” appeared and been
suddenly widely dispersed in the population.

I should note here that precisely the same attributions were made with the
inexplicable appearance of ZIKA in South America – that it was brought there by a
traveler to see the World Cup or, alternatively, arrived in a shipment of automobile tires.
Let me note further that ZIKA is transmitted only by mosquito bites, so an “infected traveler
to the World Cup” would have to be bitten by quite a few mosquitoes who would then
become infected and spread through all of South and Central America, covering
20 million square kilometers and infecting millions of people simultaneously in 20
countries. The claim about the auto tires is merely a clever bit of disingenuous
propaganda; most of us have seen used auto tires resting somewhere with water in them,
and we know that pools of water are breeding grounds for mosquitoes, so this superficially
seems to make sense. But on reflection, how many auto tires do you need, and how
many mosquitoes breeding in them, to infect hundreds of thousands of soldiers
in many different locations?

Dr. Alan Cantwell wrote an article on the West Nile virus [160] in which he made some
very interesting points, one of which was that while many infectious diseases had been
banished from the world, a great many new ones had emerged to replace them,
including HIV, Lyme Disease, Hepatitis C, Legionnaire’s disease, the so-called
“mad cow disease”, the hantavirus and hemorrhagic fever, and Ebola. He wrote:

“Health officials blame increased global travel and globalization, population growth and
movements, deforestation and reforestation programs, human sexuality (in the case of
HIV), and increased human contact with tropical mini-forests and other wilderness habitats
that are reservoirs for insects and animals that harbor unknown infectious
agents. Nowhere in the official list of causes is the fact that for many decades
67
millions of animals and innumerable vials of infectious material have been
shipped around the world for commercial and biological warfare
purposes. Epidemiologists suspect that the West Nile virus has for the first time [in 1999]
been isolated in humans or animals in the Western Hemisphere, but the virus has for
decades made its home in several U.S. research laboratories, including
Rockefeller University in Manhattan and Yale University in New Haven, Conn. In
fact, investigators there were the first to grow and study the West Nile virus in the United
States. The work began in the 1950s when unidentified viral samples from around
the world arrived at Rockefeller on a steady basis.” – From an article in Newsday in
September 29, 1999, titled, “Area Labs Have Long Studied Virus / Yale, Rockefeller began
tests in ’50s”. The article appears to have been removed.

It may simply have been a fortuitous coincidence that the outbreak of West Nile
Fever in New York coincided with a “field test” of a new OraVax vaccine, one
which was patented by the US government at Fort Detrick. Dr. Cantwell also noted
that with the West Nile virus, as with many other pathogens, the US military even
patented the process for using mosquitoes to spread the disease. But then the Wall
Street Journal reported that “OraVax Gets $3 Million Grant To Develop West Nile
Vaccine”. [161] That seemed fitting, somehow.

In his paper, Dr. Cantwell quoted an article from the Associate Press that stated in part,
“In Army tests at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., japonicus was found to be the “most
competent vector” [transmitter] for West Nile virus in a laboratory setting, when
compared with other mosquitoes.” from the Federal Register: March 22, 1996 (Volume 61,
Number 57, Page 11812) U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 08/348,882, filed
November 28, 1994, and entitled “Infectious cDNA Clones of Japanese Encephalitis Virus
and Attenuated Strains Japanese Encephalitis Virus Made from the Clones”. He concluded
by writing that with this widespread world trade coupled with advances in gene-splicing
technology, has resulted in the production of new laboratory diseases that have potential
biological warfare capabilities, stating that “the implications of all these scientific
“advances” have naturally led many to suspect or conclude that these repeatedly-
emerging new epidemics are man-made.”

It is difficult to disagree with this conclusion, since suspicion naturally arises when a
pathogen that has been actively researched by the military for more than 30 years, with
many mutations patented by the US military, suddenly escapes into the public and is
blamed on a mosquito in a Japanese auto tire. I do not know the source of this virus that
emerged in the US, nor have I formed conclusions about the method of its introduction and
spread among the US states, but one needn’t be a scientist (nor a conspiracy theorist) to
know that the official story created in the White House and promulgated by the mass media,
is almost certainly untrue. Our suspicions are further aroused when public
investigation into the source and method of dispersal of these pathogens appears
to be voluntarily censored, with no news medium or reporter exhibiting any
interest in contradicting an official story which is implausible at best and almost
certainly false.

68
Once again, thinking of the common signs of a bio-warfare agent: West Nile Fever was
rare, existing only in other parts of the world, but appeared suddenly in the US with a new
strain that was not harmless as the original, but “caused irreparable nervous system
damage”. The disease broke out primarily in California, then spread. Further, the
appearance of the disease coincided perfectly with the distribution of an
experimental vaccine: this is very common with many new disease outbreaks –
that they so often appear on the heels of a WHO or other vaccination program,
too often to be mere coincidences. This is true, and happens all over the world. There
was no identifiable origin, no source. The West Nile virus is a Flavivirus, of the same
family as ZIKA, which are normally harmless, but this strain was deadly, and the
US government at Fort Detrick patented not only the pathogen but the best means
of distributing it. And of course, the official intimidation to silence on the matter. Draw
whatever conclusions you think are appropriate.

3.3.5. Vaping

We have all read about the outbreak of lung injuries initially attributed to vaping, or the
use of e-cigarettes, that started in the US in 2019 and resulted in around 3,000 illnesses
and around 100 deaths, these emergencies mostly involving younger people, especially
young men and boys. [162] The reported symptoms included severe pneumonia,
shortness of breath, coughing, fever, fatigue, and respiratory failure. From the
beginning, this illness was identified as “a localised problem”. Experts in toxicology and

69
addiction said they were sure that the American cases of serious lung injuries linked to
vaping were “a US-specific phenomenon”. Dr Anne Schuchat from the CDC (she of
COVID fame) said the outbreak was expected to continue for some time, with no
indication of how she would know that. [163]

There had been for a long time the occasional difficulty related to vaping, but the sudden
explosion in 2019 was unprecedented. This was where the speculation began. What
was the cause of the severe pneumonias and deaths of the young people that were
originally attributed to vaping? First, the “official story”: Officials were quick to
condemn vitamin E acetate from the cigarettes as the compound likely behind the
mystery illnesses, saying that the substance was found in “nearly every” cannabis
vape product they tested. Federal health officials called the substance a “chemical of
concern” after finding it in lung fluid samples from 29 patients diagnosed with vaping lung
injury.

But their diagnosis was clearly nonsense, and the nonsensical aspect increased with each
new detail revealed. First, they claimed to have found vitamin E acetate in “nearly every”
marijuana product they tested. [164] Its absence in some of the products would obviously
negate it as a cause. But more than that, this was in “marijuana vape products” which
were by no means the only product being used. Secondly, they found it in lung fluid
samples from 29 patients. But there were more than 3,000 patients, 2,970 of whom
did not have this compound in their lungs. This is exactly the same as seeing a person
in the vicinity of a few bank robberies and then convicting him of every bank robbery that
ever happened.

70
To make matters worse, the injured patients, according to the authorities, “used a [large]
number of different devices, from vaporisers to smaller e-cigarettes, and a variety of
different brands of liquids and cartridges. The CDC itself reported no consistency among
the illnesses or deaths. [165] No single substance was shown to cause the illness, and
investigators conceded there had to be more than one cause [166] – or perhaps a common
cause that was not identified. This latter would appear to be the case, since attending
physicians unanimously claimed the vaping itself was not the prime cause, that
there was another pathogen at work but they had no idea what it was.

Even more, a study of lung tissue samples from 17 patients found that the injuries looked
like chemical burns or toxic chemical exposure. There were later reports that the lung
damage resembled the “ground glass” appearance of COVID damage. It was eventually
concluded – in countries other than the US – that the combination of e-cigarettes with
COVID-19 could have been the cause, that some aspect of that combination could be
deadly even to young otherwise-healthy individuals. It was then that a Taiwanese
physician, after examining the evidence, concluded firmly that the symptoms and
conditions could not be explained by e-cigarettes. He also stated further that the more than
200 simultaneous “pulmonary fibrosis” cases revealed in the US also experienced
conditions and symptoms that could not be explained by pulmonary fibrosis. He wrote the
US officials to inform them of his findings and ask them to seriously consider that
both illnesses were actually caused by a combination with COVID. They apparently
responded by insisting on vaping as the cause, then silenced further discussion. The
Taiwanese doctor then went public to state that the COVID outbreak began in the
US much earlier than assumed.

I can recall thinking at the time, that the main objective of the official story was to bury
some unrevealed truths, since the story simply didn’t make sense as presented because
too much contrary evidence was obviously being ignored, and because there were many
later indications that COVID had indeed been circulating in the US much earlier
than admitted.

Let’s look at the common signs of a bio-warfare agent again. Certainly an uncommon
pathogen, so uncommon it was never identified or, if it was identified, those in the know
kept that knowledge to themselves. There was no epidemiological explanation, no clear
idea of source, origin, or cause. It had an unusual presentation in that it affected
only those who were using vaping products, and primarily attacked only the
young. It also had an unusual geographic distribution and multiple outbreaks of
the same pathogen.

But there is something else here of importance. Think: A gas line develops a leak, and then
ignites, and burns down a large shopping mall. If Wikipedia were to create a page for this
event, it would state that a gas line developed a leak, ignited, and burned down a shopping
mall. There would be no need to lie because there would be nothing to cover up, nothing
to hide. But in every case I have examined where there are serious questions about the
veracity of the official story, where we have good reason to form “conspiracy
theories’, Wikipedia is there with a page that is replete with lies. And Wiki does so

71
here, opening by telling us that these young people who suffered injury did so because
they were “users of illegal, unregulated cannabis vaping products”. [167] Every
word in that statement is a lie. There was no evidence that any of the products were illegal
or unregulated and, while a large percentage had tried cannabis “at least one time”, the
illnesses were by no means restricted to the use of cannabis. And, as is standard, Wiki then
fills the room with smoke, and leaves. This fact alone raises my personal suspicions to a
high level because, in my experience, Wikipedia fabricates wild tales that support the
“official narrative” in every instance that involves a political risk. When Wikipedia
begins telling lies, we know that our suspicions are justified. Wiki did a masterful
job on SARS, MERS, ZIKA, and others, in the same way.

3.3.6. Virginia Nursing home infections

Immediately prior to the shutdown of Fort Detrick, a mysterious respiratory illness

broke out at the Greenspring Retirement Community in Fairfax, an hour’s drive
from Fort Detrick. The nursing home had had 63 cases of the disease and three deaths.
The “pneumonia of unknown cause” was reported in two nursing homes near Fort
Detrick, and immediately after this the CDC announced the closure of the Fort Detrick
labs. [168] Then in September, the Maryland health service stated that the “pneumonia
of unknown cause” had connections with e-cigarettes, or vaping illnesses. Shortly after
that, a pulmonary disease with symptoms highly resembling COVID-19 started
spreading in several US states.

It may be an odd coincidence that the events appeared to be connected, but the close
timing raised many suspicions of cause and effect. At around the same time as Fort
Detrick was closed, there were sudden reports of unexplained respiratory disease
72
in two communities in Virginia near Detrick, and others a bit later in
Wisconsin. Shortly thereafter, the “vaping” deaths began as well as the pulmonary
fibrosis cases. [169] [170] [171]

It wasn’t only these two nursing homes. According to the Virginia State health
department, the number of reported respiratory cases increased by 50% in a
short time. Officials tested for a variety of common virus- or bacteria-borne respiratory
illnesses, but failed to identify a likely cause. It is possible that COVID illnesses were mis-
diagnosed in these situations since there is evidence that COVID was circulating in the US
much earlier than originally thought. One of the odd factors was the timing. Benjamin
Schwartz, a health department director, “Seeing a respiratory outbreak in a long-term
care facility is not odd. … One thing that’s different about this outbreak is just that it’s
occurring in the summer when, usually, we don’t have a lot of respiratory
disease.” [172] That was precisely the objections being made in many European countries
about COVID – that respiratory illnesses never appear during the summer, that
they always wait for the “flu season” in the fall. This fact alone raised many suspicions
about the synthetic nature of the virus, and the same was true at the nursing homes in
Maryland.

And just as with the “vaping” illnesses, no specific pathogen was ever identified as the
cause of the outbreak, despite extensive testing. [173] [174] [175] As with the supposed
vaping illnesses, the situation remained unresolved. We cannot pretend to label every
unusual disease outbreak as emanating from a lab, but equally we needn’t silence our
concerns and, if suspicions arise due to the circumstances, we must not be fearful of
examining these possibilities. A theory cannot be dismissed if it fits all the known
facts.Once again, we have an unusual pathogen that could not be identified, an
outbreak with no epidemiological explanation, no clear idea of source, origin, or
cause. An unusual presentation in that it affected only the elderly – who would be the most
susceptible to COVID, an unusual seasonal appearance that belied its apparent nature, an
unusual geographic distribution in that it appeared only in nursing homes in the
vicinity of Fort Detrick, and we had multiple epidemics of apparently the same
pathogen. I would have to say the suspicions appear justified.

3.3.7. The Pandemic That Never Was: The 2009 Swine Flu Outbreak

President Barack Obama being vaccinated against H1N1 flu on 20 December 2009. Source

73
 This one has so many delicious aspects that it’s difficult to know where to begin. We can
start with Nature Magazine screaming “Swine flu outbreak sweeps the globe“, and
telling us that “The world is bracing itself for the imminent onset of an influenza
pandemic”. [176] The virus appeared to be a new strain of H1N1 that resulted from a
previous triple reassortment of bird, swine, and human flu viruses which further
combined with a Eurasian pig flu virus, along with other viruses from Asia and Africa.
The WHO declared a worldwide public health emergency, as did the US. Wikipedia led
the parade on this one, initially claiming that “perhaps 1.4 billion people” – 21% of the
global population – could be infected, only Heaven knowing how many might die. [177]

3.3.7.1. The Source and Origin – Official Story

Some catholics gathered yesterday at the Metropolitan Cathedral (in Mexico City). They prayed for
the sick people, the government and the rest of the society. Hoping they make “good decisions”
against the swine flu epidemic in our country. Source

“The 2009 swine H1N1 flu pandemic originated in pigs from a very small region in central
Mexico, according to a research team headed by investigators at the Icahn School of
Medicine at Mount Sinai. Researchers used “state-of-the-art genetic analysis” to
identify the precise location [where] a pig influenza virus [jumped] into
humans.” [178] Science Daily identified the senior author of this “study”, Adolfo García-
Sastre, PhD, and we know it must be legitimate just from the length of the man’s
title: Director of the Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Irene and
Dr. Arthur M. Fishberg Chair and Professor of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), and
Professor of Microbiology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. There
were many media reports of large numbers of infections and deaths in Mexico.
74
You may not know that mixing viruses is a messy and unpredictable business. You
can spend hours recombining things and not get anything you hoped for. But
fortunately, NPR (National Public Radio) enlightens us on a way out of this time-consuming
dilemma:

“Pigs can become mixing pots for viruses to swap genes and mutate. Scientists say the
gene-swapping that gave rise to the newly discovered swine flu virus happened 10 or 20
years ago … but until recently, the virus wasn’t able to spread among people. It acquired
that ability only last year, when the older triple virus combined again with two other pig
viruses that circulated in North American and Eurasian swine.” [179] No need for
extravagant efforts; just let Nature do it for you. And who knew that pigs were
“mixing-pots” for viruses?

It is important to note that – also according to the NPR – “The virus may also be causing
sickness in sub-Saharan Africa”. However, Laurie Garrett, a senior fellow for global
health at the Council on Foreign Relations (a medical expert if there ever was one) said
they have no information because “public health officials only have good data from
countries with strong public health systems”, and besides, countries “are no longer
reporting [infections and deaths]”. This CFR medical expert also stated ominously that the
virus “could cause as many as 90,000 deaths in the United States” alone. [180]

In other words, this innocuous infection is sweeping the world and likely to kill
huge numbers of Americans and, even though we have no facts or information to
verify any of this, we are wildly speculating to drive up the public’s anxiety level
and encourage them to get vaccinated.

The NPR and CFR cogitations may be correct. The NCBI tells us that pigs have “avian-like”
viruses that are close to H1N1 viruses isolated in Europe and the H3N2 viruses isolated in
Asia. Unfortunately, the sequences of these genes do not directly reveal the immediate
source of the virus, but NCBI speculates that “The three parents of the virus may have
been assembled in one place by natural means, such as by migrating birds“. [181]

Sadly, it was not explained how a flock of Canada geese flying from Saskatchewan to
Tijuana would arrange to stop in Bakersfield and “assemble” a group of viruses before
proceeding on their journey. But let’s not spoil their story. However, pigs must have been
involved somewhere in this mess, because Martha Nelson, an evolutionary biologist at
the US NIAID, said, “We learned a lot about pig farming [in researching
this]”. [182]

75
3.3.7.2. A Media Extravaganza in Support of the Official Story

President Obama at Homeland Security Council meeting in Cabinet Room to discuss the H1N1 flu
May 1, 2009. Source

Reuters (who are shameless liars as bad as Wikipedia) did their best to put a bad
face on this by claiming this influenza was “15 times deadlier” than officially admitted
by health authorities. This was based on “a new study” by “an international group of
scientists” who claimed that the WHO estimate of worldwide deaths at only
18,500, was in gross error and that “as many as 579,000 people” might have died.
According to Reuters, all the other deaths were not counted because those people
were “without access to a health system”. [183] Dr. Fatimah Dawood of the US
CDC, who led the study, said “This pandemic really did take an enormous toll”,
without explaining how such a minor fatality rate equated to “an enormous
toll”. But Fatimah did promote the encouragement of vaccines “in areas where the death
toll is likely to be highest.” I want to note here that this Reuters article contained “Reporting
by Sharon Begley and Editing by Michele Gershberg and Xavier Briand“.

To summarise the Official Story:

Part of this summary is inconclusive, since NPR and the NCBI are still arguing about whether
it was the pigs or the migrating hummingbirds that collected several kinds of viruses from
76
humans, birds, pigs, raccoons, probably skunks and porcupines, from Asia, Africa, and the
Americas, and then “mixed” the viruses to form this deadly new strain. But the
important thing is that investigators from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai were
able to identify “the precise location in Mexico where a pig influenza virus jumped
into humans.” It was on the pig farm of Hector Gonzalez, 30 Kms. from
Guadalajara, in his pig sty #3 of 500 sq. meters (North-East corner) where it
happened. One of his farm laborers, Speedy Gonzalez, was infected by one of the
pigs, then traveled to the US where he infected at least 80 million Americans, then
spread his virus to sub-Saharan Africa, killed 579,000 people, pausing just long
enough to give the pharma companies $40 billion in revenue from selling
needless vaccines that killed more people than did the virus.

Pandemrix, 2009 flu pandemic vaccine produced by GlaxoSmithKline. Big ampulla with purple cap
contains antigen solution. Small ampulla with yellow cap contains immunologic adjuvant AS03 in a
emulsion. Source

This last is not an idle claim. There were many reports of serious adverse reactions and
deaths resulting from the swine flu vaccine. [184] The IBI Times published an article,
“Brain-Damaged UK Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine to Get £60 Million
Compensation“. “Peter Todd, a lawyer who represented many of the claimants, told
the Sunday Times: “There has never been a case like this before. The victims of this
vaccine have an incurable and lifelong condition and will require extensive
medication.” Following the swine flu outbreak of 2009, about 60 million people,
most of them children, received the vaccine. It was subsequently revealed that
the vaccine, Pandemrix, can cause narcolepsy and cataplexy.” [185]

77
3.3.7.3. The Actual Results

In the end, the CDC admitted that infections and mortality were “no higher than
that of the yearly seasonal flu”. The CDC “estimated” around 7,000 deaths (other
informed estimates were less than half that) and as many as 80 million infections
– far less than a normal seasonal flu. The CDC tells us that “Estimating the number
of individual flu cases in the United States is very challenging because people
don’t seek medical care”. [186] Of course, the reason they don’t seek medical care is
because they aren’t sick, but let’s not spoil the CDC’s story.

Then, no doubt with great shame, Wikipedia had to retract its original story: “There had
also been speculation that the flu death toll in Mexico could be lower than first
thought.” Note that the huge death tolls in Mexico were initially reported as fact in the
media, while the actual facts of a very low death toll are now termed “speculation”. This
kind of playing with words is very common in the media and is very serious
because it changes the meanings of words and distorts our understanding of
events. Gerald Evans, head of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious
Disease Canada, said there was a huge amount of speculation, and that “what seemed
to be evidence of dozens and dozens of deaths”, in the end was people who died of
other causes unrelated to influenza. [187] Another Canadian expert,Neil
Rau, criticized the WHO’s decision to raise its pandemic alert to level 5, saying it
was meant only to cause panic, not because a pandemic actually
existed. CNN noted that in any individual week there had been at least 800 deaths
in the U.S. due to normal influenza, which was much higher than the 150 total
deaths worldwide from the swine flu up to that time.

3.3.7.4. Possible or Probable Origin

A scientist holds up PCR tubes used for the analysis of the 2009 H1N1 (“swine flu”) outbreak.Andreas
Rentz/Getty Images. Source

78
Outside of the official story by the authorities, the virtually unanimous consensus
among all other doctors, scientists, and even casual observers, was that this virus
originated in a lab and was leaked. The only discussion was whether the leak was
accidental or deliberate. “Top scientists are saying that the current swine flu outbreak came
from a vaccine lab”. [188] Shanta Zimmer and Donald Burke from the University of
Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania wrote in the UK Independent, “One of the most likely routes
for the release of the 1950s virus is that laboratory workers became infected accidentally
and then infected families and friends.” [189] But if this occurred, we would have been
able to identify a source, and we would have had a patient zero. And this version denies
the existence of pigs and hummingbirds “mixing” the viruses, as well as eliminating Speedy
Gonzalez.

An Australian researcher claimed the swine flu was not a natural mutation but a
man-made product of genetic experiments leaked from a
laboratory. [190] The British Medical Journal, Opinion section, reported that many
mass media were speculating that the swine flu was a “man-made disaster”. The study in
the New England Journal of Medicine said: “Careful study of the genetic origin of the
(1977) virus showed that it was closely related to a 1950 strain, but dissimilar to influenza
‘A’ (H1N1) strains from both 1947 and 1957.” This finding suggested that the 1977
outbreak strain has been preserved since 1950. The re-emergence was probably an
accidental release from a laboratory source. [191] And the Daily Mail ran an article titled,
Swine flu pandemic caused by accidental leak from laboratory.” [192]

3.3.7.5. Criticisms of Officials and the Official Story

To put the key question most crudely: was the world wrongly persuaded to believe it was in
the grip of a ghastly and severe pandemic by decision-making bodies unduly
influenced by pharmaceutical companies hoping to sell billions of dollars worth of
vaccines and anti-viral drugs? A report just out from the Council of Europe has come to
some devastating conclusions. Source

79
Forbes began an article with this gem: “The H1N1 swine flu outbreak appears to have
ended less like the rogue wild boar that United Nations bureaucrats predicted and
more like roasted pork tenderloin with apples and sage. From the beginning, the
World Health Organization’s actions have ranged from the dubious to the
flagrantly incompetent. (The Pandemic That Wasn’t; Henry I. Miller) [193]

“Ironically, one might even consider the emergence of the H1N1 flu during the
past year a net public health benefit, since it appears to have suppressed, or at
least supplanted, the far more virulent and lethal seasonal flu strains. During the
second week of January, 3.7% of Americans tested positive for the seasonal flu,
compared with 11.5% during the same week last year. The death toll in the U.S.
from H1N1 is estimated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be
around 3,900, while in an average year seasonal flu kills about 36,000.” ABC
Australia published a stinging rebuke of the entire affair. The article is very worth reading
for all the inconvenient truths it contains: [194]

“Instead of accolades, the WHO and authorities everywhere are facing an

avalanche of disturbing questions about the handling of the swine flu, and the
influence of vested interests. To put the key question most crudely: was the world
wrongly persuaded to believe it was in the grip of a ghastly and severe pandemic
by decision-making bodies unduly influenced by pharmaceutical companies
hoping to sell billions of dollars worth of vaccines and anti-viral drugs? A report
just out from the Council of Europe has come to some devastating conclusions. The
declaration of a pandemic lead to a “waste of huge sums of public
money”, a “distortion of priorities” in public health services, the “provocation of
unjustified fear” and the “creation of health risks through vaccines and
medications” that may not have been sufficiently tested.” Unfortunately, the “the
damming Council of Europe report” has been deleted from the Internet. the title was
“Faked pandemics – a threat for health.”

“The report explains that the WHO definition of a “pandemic” was changed in May 2009,
after the first cases of swine flu were reported. The change removed the requirement that
a virus’s impact be severe, before a pandemic was declared. The report cites concerns
within the scientific community that the WHO rapidly moved towards declaring “pandemic
level 6” in June, 2009, when swine flu presented “relatively mild symptoms”. It went
on to state that the declaration of the pandemic was only made possible by “changing
the definition” and by “lowering the threshold for its declaration.” But it was this
all-important declaration which triggered pre-pandemic planning that would
prove highly lucrative to industry: “pharmaceutical companies had a strong
vested interest in the declaration of a pandemic” the report states. At the same
time, the membership list of the WHO’s 16-member “Emergency Committee”,
instrumental in declaring the pandemic, remains secret – a lack of transparency
strongly attacked by the report.”

A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence
that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who
advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to
80
governments. Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial
and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines? Why
was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work
from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir? And
why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a
secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wondering whether major public health
organisations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical
science. Source

The British Medical Journal, (BMJ) published its own journalistic investigation, revealing
that specialists with financial links to the drug industry were intimately involved
in WHO pre-pandemic planning: Feature: Conflicts of Interest: WHO and the
pandemic flu “conspiracies”. “Key scientists advising the World Health
Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had done paid work for
pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing.
These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO
has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as “conspiracy
theories.” My compliments to Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter who investigated
this. [195]

NOTES

[110] Project Bacchus

https://medium.com/@harihshramm114/project-bacchus-248b9f27ff86

[111] Project Bacchus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Bacchus

[112] Secret project manufactured mock anthrax

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2001/oct/26/20011026-030448-2429r/

81
[113] Next to Old Rec Hall, a ‘Germ-Making Plant’
https://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/04/world/next-to-old-rec-hall-a-germ-making-plant.html

[114] Project Clear Vision

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Clear_Vision

[115] Project Jefferson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Jefferson

[116] Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War

https://www.amazon.com/Germs-Biological-Weapons-Americas-Secret/dp/0684871599

[117] Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germs:_Biological_Weapons_and_America%27s_Secret_War

[118] Review of GERMS: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/review-of-germs-biological-weapons-and-
americas-secret-war-56399043/

[119] Weapons of mass hysteria: Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2001/oct/20/highereducation.news1

[120] Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/germs.htm

[121] Germs: Biological Weapons And America’s Secret War

https://ia800102.us.archive.org/17/items/GermsBiologicalWeaponsAndAmericasSecretWar/Germs_
%20Biological%20Weapons%20and%20America%27s%20Secret%20War%20-
%20Judith%20Miller%20%26%20William%20J%20Broad%20%26%20Stephen%20Engelberg.pdf

[122] The Wrong Man

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/05/the-wrong-man/308019/

[123] Scientist Is Paid Millions by U.S. in Anthrax Suit

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/28/washington/28hatfill.html

[124] Man suspected in anthrax attacks said to commit suicide

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/01/world/americas/01iht-02anthrax.14950820.html

[125] Police State America, Volume 2

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Police-State-America-Volume-
Two.pdf

[126] New Evidence Adds Doubt to FBI’s Case Against Anthrax Suspect
https://www.propublica.org/article/new-evidence-disputes-case-against-bruce-e-ivins

[127] Suicide of Anthrax Scientist Raises Questions

https://www.science.org/content/article/suicide-anthrax-scientist-raises-questions

[128] Operation Gladio: CIA State-Sponsored Terror

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11167/

[129] Operation Northwoods — Targeting Terrorism Against American Citizens

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11675/

[130] How Kodak Discovered the Atomic Bomb

https://fstoppers.com/historical/how-kodak-discovered-atomic-bomb-114260

82
[131] 1993 Four Corners hantavirus outbreak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Four_Corners_hantavirus_outbreak

[132] Doctors still trying to diagnose mysteries of hantavirus

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2012-sep-10-la-me-hantavirus-mystery-20120911-
story.html

[133] Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of the Government’s Secret Plum Island Germ Laboratory
https://www.amazon.com/Lab-257-Disturbing-Governments-Laboratory/dp/0060011416

[134] Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of the Government’s Secret Germ Laboratory
https://www.amazon.com/Lab-257-Disturbing-Governments-Laboratory/dp/006078184X

[135] Lab 257 : the disturbing story of the government’s secret Plum Island germ laboratory
https://archive.org/details/lab257disturbing00carr/page/n9/mode/2up

[136] Plum Island Animal Disease Center

https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/plum-island-animal-disease-center

[137] Plum Island Animal Disease Center

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plum_Island_Animal_Disease_Center

[138] Lyme Disease

https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/index.html

[139] Lyme disease

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyme_disease

[140] The US Government Declares War on America — Part 3 – The US Declares War on its own
Military
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10806/

[141] Lyme Disease

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10039154/

[142] US Government Admits Lyme Disease Is A Bioweapon

http://rense.com/general69/lyme.htm

[143] Living Next Door To Plum Island; Lyme Disease – Denial of Treatment and Doctor Persecution
https://samento.com.ec/sciencelib/4lyme/plumisland.html

[144] U.S. bioweapon lab suspected of source of lyme disease: expert

http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-08/25/c_1310147711.htm

[145] Lyme Bacterium Predates the U.S. Lab That Conspiracy Theorists Say Unleashed Ticks on Public
https://now.tufts.edu/2019/07/18/lyme-bacterium-predates-us-lab-conspiracy-theorists-say-
unleashed-ticks-public

[146] Did Lawmakers Demand the Pentagon Disclose If It Developed Weaponized Ticks?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/weaponized-ticks/

[147] Pentagon May Have Released Weaponized Ticks That Helped Spread of Lyme Disease:
Investigation Ordered
https://www.newsweek.com/pentagon-weaponized-ticks-lyme-disease-investigation-1449737

[148] Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons
https://thehumanist.com/magazine/july-august-2019/arts_entertainment/bitten-the-secret-history-
of-lyme-disease-and-biological-weapons

83
[148a] Horowitz Agrees With Leahy: ‘West Nile Probable Bioattack’
https://rense.com/general29/provb.htm

[149] The US Government Declares War on America — Part 3 – The US Declares War on its own
Military
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10806/

[150] Disability among US Army Veterans vaccinated against anthrax

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22874851/

[151] Court ruling again stops anthrax shots for US soldiers

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/anthrax/court-ruling-again-stops-anthrax-shots-us-soldiers

[152] GAO: Military anthrax shots caused many reactions, prompted some pilots to quit
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/anthrax/gao-military-anthrax-shots-caused-many-reactions-prompted-
some-pilots-quit

[153] GULF WAR ILLNESS SYMPTOMS BAFFLED SCIENTISTS. UNTIL NOW.

https://www.dav.org/learn-more/news/2022/gulf-war-illness-has-baffled-scientists-until-now/

[154] Gulf War Syndrome

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/gulf-war-syndrome

[155] Gulf War Illnesses: Causes and Controversies

https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)63058-9/fulltext

[156] High frequency of systemic mycoplasmal infections in Gulf War veterans and civilians
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12383408/

[157] Chronic Mycoplasmal Infections in Gulf War Veterans’ Children

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235919110_Chronic_Mycoplasmal_Infections_in_Gulf_W
ar_Veterans’_Children_and_Autism_Patients

[158] ATCC
https://www.atcc.org/about-us/what-we-do

[159] ATCC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATCC_(company)

[160] The New West Nile Virus Epidemic … Bioterrorism Or Mother Nature?
https://rense.com/general95/thenewwestnile.html

[161] OraVax Gets $3 Million Grant To Develop West Nile Vaccine

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB965256491105186921

[162] 2019–2020 vaping lung illness outbreak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%932020_vaping_lung_illness_outbreak

[163] US vaping illness deaths rise to 18 with 1,000 cases reported

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49929276

[164] CDC claims 47 Americans are dead as a result of vaping

https://nypost.com/2019/11/22/cdc-claims-47-americans-are-dead-as-a-result-of-vaping/

[165] New CDC Report Provides First Analysis of Lung Injury Deaths Associated with Use of E-
cigarette, or Vaping, Products
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/p1028-first-analysis-lung-injury-deaths.html

84
[166] Vaping illness, deaths likely very rare beyond U.S., experts say
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-vaping-britain-idUSKBN1WT1XP

[167] 2019–2020 vaping lung illness outbreak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%932020_vaping_lung_illness_outbreak

[168] Shutdown of the Fort Detrick laboratory before the outbreak of the disease was not a
coincidence:
https://english.cctv.com/2021/08/10/ARTImZ6SuN3NL3ZEfoycgvx4210810.shtml

[169] Third person has died after respiratory illness outbreak at Greenspring Village, Fairfax officials
say
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2019/07/17/third-person-has-died-after-respiratory-
illness-outbreak-greenspring-village-fairfax-officials-say/

[170] Outbreak Investigation at Assisted Living Facility in Springfield

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/health/outbreak-investigation-assisted-living-facility-springfield

[171] The suspicious Fort Detrick Base

https://english.cctv.com/2021/08/09/ARTIAR04hisNvPIZaNKfKNpk210809.shtml

[172] ‘Respiratory outbreak’ being investigated at retirement community after 54 residents fall ill
https://abcnews.go.com/US/respiratory-outbreak-investigated-retirement-community-54-residents-
fall/story?id=64275865

[173] Respiratory illness outbreak at retirement home kills 2 and sickens dozens more
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/11/us/virginia-retirement-community-respiratory-illness-
outbreak/index.html

[174] Mystery virus: What’s killing, hospitalizing residents at Greenspring retirement center?
https://wjla.com/news/local/mystery-virus-greenspring-retirement-cdc-va

[175] Cause of Respiratory Illness Still Unknown After Dozens Sickened at Virginia Retirement
Community
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/health-officials-to-give-update-after-respiratory-illness-
sickens-dozens-at-virginia-retirement-community/135890/

[176] Swine flu outbreak sweeps the globe

https://www.nature.com/articles/news.2009.408

[177] 2009 swine flu pandemic in the United States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_swine_flu_pandemic

[178] 2009 swine flu pandemic originated in Mexico, researchers discover

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/06/160627160935.htm

[179] Q&A: Where Did The Swine Flu Come From?

https://www.npr.org/2009/09/10/112683634/q-a-where-did-the-swine-flu-come-from

[180] Leaders In Medicine, Public Health Tackle Swine Flu

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112056028

[181] From where did the 2009 ‘swine-origin’ influenza A virus (H1N1) emerge?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2787513/

[182] The Hunt for a Pandemic’s Origins

https://www.the-scientist.com/features/the-hunt-for-a-pandemic-s-origins-69502

85
[183] 2009 swine flu outbreak was 15 times deadlier: study
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-swineflu-idUSBRE85O1DF20120625

[184] High Rates of Adverse Events Linked with 2009 H1N1 Pandemic Vaccine
https://www.contagionlive.com/view/high-rates-of-adverse-events-linked-with-2009-h1n1-pandemic-
vaccine

[185] Brain-Damaged UK Victims of Swine Flu Vaccine to Get £60 Million Compensation
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brain-damaged-uk-victims-swine-flu-vaccine-get-60-million-
compensation-1438572

[186] CDC Estimates of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Cases

https://www.cdc.gov/H1N1flu/estimates/April_February_13.htm

[187] 2009 swine flu pandemic in the United States

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_swine_flu_pandemic_in_the_United_States

[188] Top scientists are saying that the current swine flu outbreak came from a vaccine lab
https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-086-medical-martial-law/

[189] Did leak from a laboratory cause swine flu pandemic?

Same strain of influenza was released by accident three decades ago
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/did-leak-from-a-laboratory-cause-swine-flu-pandemic-
1724448.html

[190] Tamiflu Developer: Swine Flu Could Have Come From Bio-Experiment Lab
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/SwineFlu/story?id=7584420&page=1

[191] The Independent and the Daily Mail are worried that swine flu might be a man-made disaster.
Was H1N1 leaked from a laboratory?
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2009/07/02/tom-nolan-was-h1n1-leaked-from-a-laboratory/

[192] Top scientists are saying that the current swine flu outbreak came from a vaccine lab
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196507/Swine-flu-pandemic-caused-accidental-leak-
laboratory.html

[193] The Pandemic That Wasn’t

https://www.forbes.com/2010/03/10/swine-flu-world-health-organization-pandemic-opinions-
contributors-henry-i-miller.html?sh=3f42c5e81617

[194] Was the swine flu a fake pandemic?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-06-11/34926

[195] WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”

https://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c2912.extract

86
4. Chapter 4 – US Foreign
Deployment

1931 — Fort Detrick Named for Maryland Flight Surgeon. Source

87
As seen in the 1988 USGS aerial photo,the site of Fort Detrick no longer has any recognizable traces
as a former airfield. Source

CONTENTS

4. 1. Secrecy of Operation
4. 2. US Bio-Chemical Warfare – Foreign Applications
4. 3. The Korean War
4. 4. US Biowarfare on Cuba and The Americas
4. 5. Vietnam and Agent Orange
4. 6. Georgian Swine Flu in Russia and China
4. 7. Bat-Borne Diseases in Asia
4. 8. The Secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit
4. 9. Operation Third Chance
4. 10. Operation Derby Hat (Biological experiments in China and Asia)
4. 10. 1. Okinawa
4. 10. 1. Afghanistan
4. 11. Ethnic-specific bioweapons
4. 12. More Secret US Government Projects

88
4. 1. Secrecy of Operation

There is one important item to understand about the biological/chemical warfare trials,
tests, and experiments. As I mentioned earlier, the US consistently either refused to sign
protocols on biological weapons, or reneged on them once signed. The stumbling block is
a refusal to be party to any agreement that requires external monitoring. The government
wanted at all costs to prevent any such inspections, and the US Senate passed a law
permitting the President to deny inspection requests on the purely fictitious grounds of
national security. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] The American solution to avoid oversight
and monitoring was to outsource its chemical and bio-weapons experiments to
Third World Countries under the guise of medical research, which labs are off-
limits to even the local governments and the American staff granted full immunity
from all domestic laws.

4.2. US Bio-Chemical Warfare – Foreign Applications

Just as with its predilection for torture, the US has been engaged in the development,
testing, and use of biological weapons for well over 100 years. It is well-documented
that during its colonisation of the Philippines, US military doctors were infecting
civilians with biological toxins that included malaria, beriberi and the plague. And
huge numbers of civilians in both the Philippines and Puerto Rico were flooded
with clouds of mustard gas during their protests against American occupation and
colonisation. Nothing has changed since then. The number of nations subjected to
American biowarfare now includes (at least) the Philippines, Korea, China, Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Cuba and Haiti, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and Syria.
And of course, the list includes the USA and Canada, where the US government and
military subjected millions of unaware and foolishly-trusting citizens to biological
pathogens and toxic chemicals. [7] [8]

A supervisor inspects mustard gas warheads at an unidentified arsenal, circa 1943. Source
89
Mustard gas was heavily used on many occasions by the Americans during both world
wars, the government’s strident denials notwithstanding. One of the more interesting
occurrences was on December 2, 1943, when the German Luftwaffe launched a surprise
attack on the Italian port of Bari, sinking about 30 ships and destroying crucial supplies of
ammunition as well as much of the harbor. However, soon after the attack, reports were
flooding in from the area of unusual medical symptoms in many hundreds, then thousands,
then tens of thousands of civilians. The source was eventually traced to a single blown-up
ship in the port, with mustard gas confirmed as the responsible agent. The US military
had, in a renege of their promises, secretly brought thousands of tons of mustard-
gas explosives to the European war party and, in their desperation to cover their
crime, refused to inform attending physicians of the cause of the massive
casualties among the civilian population, leaving the doctors to eventually figure
it out for themselves by which time it was too late for many of the victims.
Countless (and uncounted) hundreds or thousands died, and many more suffered
debilitating injuries. [9] [10] [11] [12]

Dwight Eisenhower and Winston Churchill in Tunisia, 25 Dec 1943; Churchill was in a robe in this
photo because he was recovering from pneumonia. World War II Database

The Americans made astonishing, if vain and inhuman, attempts to conceal the disaster
entirely, but there were far too many witnesses and victims to enable keeping this secret.
The Americans did their best at damage control by issuing statements intended for German
ears that these chemical weapons would never have been used except as retaliation in
kind, though German ears were not reported as especially gullible at the time. Even more
90
interesting was the damage control meant for American and British ears; Eisenhower and
Churchill concocted a plot to (1) destroy all incriminating documents and (2) list
all fatalities and other casualties as “burns due to enemy action”.

The US military appears desperate not only to find biological ways to kill nations of people,
but is equally interested in methods of destroying their food supply. Accordingly, it also
confessed to another several dozen (at least) occasions where devastating crop and plant
disease agents had been released, in experiments to test methods of destroying the entire
food plant life of an enemy nation. In 2012, Japanese media revealed that the United States
government had tested specific, DNA-engineered crop-killing bioweapons in Okinawa and
Taiwan during the 1960s and early 1970s, and that the US military tested some of these
within the continental US as well. They were also applied in Vietnam. [13] [14] [15] The
purpose of Agent Orange was never as a defoliant as claimed, but developed
instead to destroy Vietnam’s entire rice crops and to sufficiently contaminate the
soil to prevent re-growth.

4.3. The Korean War

PYONGYANG, NORTH KOREA – SEPTEMBER 09: Statue of a soldier with a grenade in the mouth at
the entrance to the victorious fatherland liberation war museum, Pyongan Province, Pyongyang,
North Korea on September 9, 2012 in Pyongyang, North Korea. (Photo by Eric Lafforgue/Art In All
Of Us/Corbis via Getty Images). Source

91
The accumulated evidence of the American use of biological weapons in China and North
Korea [16] is beyond dispute, but the US government has lied about it for 70 years. A full
report was produced after an investigation by the International Scientific
Commission on the use of biological warfare against both Korea and China. You
can access a summary here, [17] and the full report here. [18]

The report was produced in 1952 at the request of the North Korean and Chinese governments by a
commission that included prominent scientists from Sweden, Brazil, France, and Italy, and was
headed by Sir Joseph Needham, one of the most prominent and respected British scientists
ever. Source

During and after the Korean War, China produced considerable evidence that the US
military was employing biological pathogens against both the Chinese and the North
Koreans. More than 25 US POWs supported Chinese claims – and provided further, and
very detailed, corroborating evidence of anthrax, various insects such as mosquitoes and
fleas carrying Yellow Fever, and even propaganda leaflets infected with cholera, over the
entire North-East of China and virtually all of North Korea. [19] The US government
immediately filed charges of sedition against the soldiers who told their stories
of these illegal activities, applying enormous pressure to silence them, even threatening
defending lawyers with unspecified retribution.

92
 THE NUMBER OF INHABITANTS OF PYONGYANG KILLED BY BOMB SPLINTERS, BURNT ALIVE AND
SUFFOCATED BY SMOKE IS INCALCULABLE, SINCE NO COMPUTATION IS POSSIBLE. SOME FIFTY
THOUSAND INHABITANTS REMAIN IN THE CITY, WHICH BEFORE THE WAR HAD A POPULATION OF FIVE
HUNDRED THOUSAND. Source

Global Research published an article on September 07, 2015 by David

Swanson [20] which provided some detail on American attempts to flood North Korea
with the Bubonic Plague, beginning with the statement, “This happened some 63 years
ago, but as the U.S. government has never stopped lying about it, and it’s generally known
only outside the United States, I’m going to treat it as news.” Correct on all counts. Curtis
LeMay not only conducted his sincere attempts to exterminate the entire civilian
population of North Korea by bombing virtually every house in the country, but
there is now a huge and still emerging volume of indisputable evidence the
Americans dropped on both North Korea and China insects and materials carrying
anthrax, cholera, encephalitis, and bubonic plague.

Then on September 10, 2012, the Los Angeles Times ran an article discussing the topic of
doctors “still trying to diagnose mysteries of the Hantavirus” more than 20 years
93
after this deadly pathogen was first identified in the US in 1993. In this case, the
virus appeared to attack only native Indians – the infections concentrated in a four-
state area – who developed sudden respiratory problems and were often dead within hours.
Most victims reported “not feeling well” one day, and were dead the next, from what
appeared as a very mysterious pathogen with an undeterminable source. But then, “a
lucky clue” arose from a television viewer, a physician who stated this illness
seemed very similar to that caused by a virus he had observed the US military
using in Korea in the 1950s. And sure enough, tests proved the illness to be caused by
a variation of the same Hantavirus that attacked troops in Korea. [21] [22]

Due to the mutation, some of the symptoms were different in that this version attacked
the respiratory system instead of the renal system, but all else appeared to be the
same. This was almost certainly a US military bio-warfare test. Experts are
unanimous in stating that when you have a very unusual disease appearing out
of nowhere, with no apparent source or transmission system, and especially if it
is ethnic-specific, the odds are virtually 100% that this is a deliberate release. You
may harbor doubts that the US military might do such things, but in another E-book in this
series there is a Section titled “The US government declares war on America”, which
documents literally tens or even hundreds of thousands of precisely such
biological and chemical “experiments” conducted on US citizens.

The virus attracted attention because some American troops were accidentally exposed to
it in Korea, most of whom died very suddenly. Two facts that were eliminated from the
public reports of the time: (1) the virus attacked North Koreans and Chinese in
greater numbers, and (2) this Hantavirus was one item in the treasure trove of
biological weapons the Americans inherited from Dr. Ishii and his Unit 731. The
Japanese were light-years ahead of the Americans and the Western Allies in virus
research and had isolated the lethal Hantavirus by the late 1930s, with much evidence it
was used against China by the Japanese and later against both China and North Korea by
the Americans. From the documentation available, it would appear the Americans employed
not only anthrax and the other listed pathogens but also attempted to use Dr. Ishii’s
weaponised hantavirus in their biological war against North Korea – and against
China as well. It seems that some of this weaponised material escaped containment and
exposed American and South Korean soldiers to their own handiwork.

When captured Americans confessed to these crimes in detail, the US government launched
a massive damage-control propaganda campaign that blamed the confessions on
“brainwashing”. Of course, it was all lies. Swanson referred to the movie ‘The Manchurian
Candidate’, which attempted to create a credible brainwashing narrative, but which was
complete nonsense. Upon returning home after their release from China, the same
American POWs discussed openly the details of their participation in their country’s bio-
warfare attempts but the mass media were surprisingly reluctant to publish the
accounts. In an attempt to discourage any attempts at improper use of the
microphone, the US government immediately filed charges of sedition against the
soldiers who told their stories of these illegal activities.

94
U.S. Air Force lieutenants Kenneth Enoch (left) and John Quinn (right) shown signing germ warfare
“confessions”, circa April 1952, photos released by the former Soviet Union. Source

The US military launched strident propaganda attempts to lessen the fallout from
revelations of its use of biological pathogens in North Korea, not least from the lingering
testimony of these returning American soldiers who repeatedly confirmed such usage. The
US government applied enormous pressure to silence these individuals, even going so far
as to threaten defending lawyers with unspecified retribution if they didn’t back off. As a
final desperate attempt to silence these former POWs, the US military relied on
the CIA to subject them to extensive treatments with a newly-discovered and
dangerous drug called Metrazol, in attempts to totally erase all memories of their
activities in Korea, apparently destroying the mens’ minds in the process.

Swanson referred to a book published by Dave Chaddock, titled, “This Must Be the
Place“, [23] [24] which presented considerable evidence that the US indeed
determinedly tried to kill tens of millions of Chinese and North Koreans with
deadly diseases, and Canadian researchers have produced substantial and irrefutable
evidence of the same in more than one recent historical study. The Western mass media
have ignored all of these, effectively censoring this entire portion of history. Once again,
freedom of speech depends entirely on who controls the microphone.

95
 Free PDF of Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare (2007). Source

In the textbook titled, Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare (2007), published by the
US military’s Surgeon-General, was some commentary on the Korean war stating, not
entirely accurately, that the US began “an expansion” of its biological warfare program
from “concerns” that the North Koreans, Chinese, or Russians might resort to biological
warfare, conveniently omitting mention of the treasure trove recently obtained from the
Japanese. In any case, it does admit to the establishment of “a large-scale
production facility in Pine Bluff, Arkansas”, with the new plant featuring
“advanced laboratory … measures enabling large-scale fermentation,
concentration, storage, and weaponization of microorganisms”. And it does also
admit that by 1951, the US had produced its first biological weapons, anti-crop bombs, and
“antipersonnel” munitions, having “weaponised and stockpiled” all these. It adds that the
CIA had independently “developed weapons using toxins including cobra venom and
saxitoxin for covert operations”, but that unfortunately “all records regarding their
development and deployment were destroyed in 1972” when the information became
public. We are then hastily assured that the US “has never used biological weapons”, this
by the same people who were simultaneously tendering contracts for the production of
anthrax and other “pathogens” in multiple batches of 3,000 liters. Dissembling
propaganda is impossible to avoid in America, even in official military medical
textbooks.

We are further informed by the Surgeon-General that accusations of American usage of

bio-warfare pathogens are just “based on anecdotal accounts of patients”, and that
96
these allegations “were not supported by scientific evidence” and had “dubious
scientific plausibility” since, even though “The United States admitted to having
biological weapons [it] denied using them”. The Surgeon-General opines that the
stories “appear to be based on Chinese experiences” with field-testing done by the
Japanese, the Chinese apparently unable to differentiate between Japanese invaders in
1935 and American invaders in 1953. However, our Surgeon-General does admit “The
credibility of the United States may have been undermined by the knowledge of
its biological weapons program and its failure to ratify the 1925 Geneva Protocol
until 1975.” – i.e., 50 years after everyone else, and that these “unsubstantiated
accusations” may have resulted in “a loss of international goodwill toward the
United States” while simultaneously demonstrating “the propaganda value of
biological warfare allegations, regardless of veracity.” It didn’t seem to occur to him
that the loss in good will might have stemmed in part not from “unsubstantiated
accusations”, but from the fact that the US refused to ratify the protocols against the use
of bio-weapons until long after the Korean and Vietnam wars were over and there was no
other war in sight. He finishes with the conclusion that “Reviews of documents from
former Soviet archives published by a Japanese newspaper in 1998 provide
evidence that the allegations were deliberate and fictitious propaganda.”

In 2006, someone named Robert Neff published a typically American, historically-

bankrupt, article on the subject of the hantavirus, beginning with the statement:

“One of the most persistent accusations from the Korean War that continues to dog the
American government is the alleged use of germ warfare in North Korea and China.
Although the United States has patently denied the charges, and recently published
documents from the Soviet archives seem to indicate the charges were concocted by the
North Koreans and Chinese, there are still many that believe there is some truth to the
charges. One particular allegation is the deliberate introduction of hemorrhagic
fever into Korea by the United States.”

Of course, Mr. Neff conveniently ignores all the damning evidence that has been uncovered
during the past 20 or so years, evidence which makes the claims of US bio-warfare
indisputable. According to him a few “members of the United Nations forces” fell ill from a
mysterious disease. (Note that the partitioning of, and genocide in, North Korea is
now attributed to ‘the United Nations’ rather than US meddling.) Mr. Neff does admit
the disease that struck his “United Nations forces” did indeed resemble the hemorrhagic
fever which the Japanese (note this) “had encountered” in Manchuria. It’s hardly a surprise
the Japanese encountered it, since they created it, and Ness would surely be aware of
this damning fact. However, he does also admit the following:

“An investigation was conducted by the Army and it was discovered that … the
Japanese had … experimented with (the hantavirus) in their Unit 731 … Biological
Weapons program. After Japan’s defeat in World War II, the commander of Unit
731, Ishii Shiro, and other officers were given immunity from war crimes
prosecution by the U.S. in exchange for data from their experiments.”

97
Precisely correct on all counts, but Mr. Neff, in his rush to exonerate the US from culpability,
fails to make the obvious connection that was made by every other medical researcher –
namely that the US put to almost immediate use Ishii’s weaponisation of the hantavirus.
Many reputable medical researchers have stated this disease did not originate in Korea but
was introduced by the Americans as a biological weapon, although another apologist
named George J. Hoffman gave us this beautifully-written – and completely dishonest –
rendition, in September 1997 in USA Today:

“Not differentiating friend from foe, this enemy of both enemies first attracted
international attention after it struck U.S. troops during the Korean War. No
stranger in a part of the world where it had been active for centuries, it blindly
attacked opposing sides and civilians with equal intensity and was irrefutably
responsible for the demise of untold numbers on and off the battlefields.”

Mr. Hoffman is correct in stating the disease attracted attention only when it attacked
American troops (or “United Nations” troops, if you prefer to believe Mr. Neff), while all the
other deaths among the Chinese and North Koreans oddly attracted no attention at all. And
the disease had most emphatically NOT been active in Asia “for centuries”. Hoffman
appears to attempt to deflect blame for the massive deaths in North Korea from US
genocide to a biological ‘act of god’. The article noted the following:

“In early August 2001, a team of six American veterans arrived in South Korea to
investigate charges of American war crimes during the Korean War. One of the members
of this team was Dr. Brian S. Wilson, who has accused the American government of
intentionally spraying South Koreans with a white spray that he believes was a myotoxin
or perhaps a form of the hemorrhagic fever. According to him, … American aircraft sprayed
… Korean people … with a white spray. The few survivors that he and his team were able
to find when they visited the site claimed: “[T]hey witnessed aerial spraying of a white
cloud or mist from light planes. They claimed that this spray seemed to lead directly to the
development of quick sickness, then a period of brief recovery before dark skin discoloration
was alarmingly noted. Most of the people present at that time … ultimately died.” Perhaps
even more distressing are the allegations that “the ROK army … came through and shot
and then burned any of the survivors they found, supposedly in an effort to hide the crime
or perhaps to ensure the disease did not spread.” Richard Applegate, a captured
American pilot, while held in China confessed that “the United States had been
conducting germ warfare upon China and North Korea. He also explained the
hemorrhagic fever outbreak amongst the American 25th division in Korea during
the summer of 1951 as the result of an accidentally dropped germ bomb. He
further wrote in his confession that within the first three or four days, about 97
percent of the victims of the disease died.”

Mr. Neff concludes his disparaging revisionism by noting that there are many internet sites
“dedicated to the alleged germ warfare committed by the American (or UN) forces”, and
that these “recite the same dogma that has been espoused for the past fifty years by the
North Koreans and Chinese”. Mr. Neff appears unable to contemplate that perhaps
the reason these claims have persisted for more than 50 years is because they

98
are valid. But Mr. Neff doesn’t stop there. He then tells us it is even more likely that the
Chinese brought the disease with them when they came to the aid of North Korea. And to
complete his 180-degree revisionism, he then claims, without a shred of evidence, that
“Korean hemorrhagic fever has also been named as one of the diseases being developed
by the North Koreans in their alleged biological warfare research”. Really? “named” by
whom, exactly? Our history has now been revised to read that the Chinese brought
the disease to Korea and killed everyone including themselves but, as a backstop,
the North Koreans developed it and killed themselves in the process. Every other
possibility, especially any possibility that includes the Americans is, according to Neff and
Hoffman, “just another conspiracy theory”. And thus is history rewritten.

To further the historical revisionism and cloud the issue by blaming the victim, we have
this: In a brief position paper dated December 2015, published on the website of an NGO
operating under the name of Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), it was stated that North Korea
“is suspected” of maintaining an ongoing biological weapons program. It states that
estimates of North Korea’s capability in this area range from almost non-existent to being
a world leader. Though admitting “there is no reliable information”, it informs us that
various parties (all Western enemies of North Korea) “assess”, or “provide a wide range of
estimates”, or “it is believed that”, or “has a biotechnology infrastructure that could support
the production of”, or “likely has the capability to develop”, or “may possess significant
expertise”, or “production is believed to have begun”, or “is suspected of having
researched”.

We are then informed that these ‘assessments’ “suggest” the North Koreans
“might” have in their inventory anthrax, smallpox, tularensis, hantavirus,
botulism, cholera, the plague, typhoid and yellow fever. And one of our favorite
warmongers whom you will know as the pathologically-deformed John R. Bolton,
America’s Ambassador of Killing Everybody, testified to the US Congress that North Korea
had developed, produced, and “likely weaponised”, bio-warfare agents, had the capability
to “produce military quantities within weeks”, and had “a variety of means to deliver these
deadly weapons”, his testimony all derived from documents certified as containing “no
reliable information”. We are also informed that North Korea “has proven
resourceful in securing materials from abroad”, as an example, the DPRK had
obtained a freeze dryer – normally used for foods but which “could be used to
freeze-dry pathogens”.

The paper does note that the Americans “have frequently asserted that the DPRK possesses
significant biological weapons capabilities”, then tells us the US estimates are seldom
consistent and most often have to be “downgraded”. In other words, the Americans lie
and exaggerate to paint North Korea in the worst possible light. And that is how we
go about trashing a country we don’t happen to like. Claims made without evidence, fatuous
allegations, unjustified suspicion presented as accomplished fact, accusations lacking even
a shred of supporting documentation, with the merest physical possibility masquerading as
accomplishment – and of course justifying immediate regime change. The American
way.

99
Even assuming all the accusations are true, my response would be to say, “So what?”. So
the North Koreans are developing biological weapons. Are they the only ones? Does Israel
have any? What about the UK, France or Germany? And what about the US? Why is it
okay for the Americans to have the greatest bio-weapons development program
in history, by orders of magnitude compared to others, but not okay for anyone
else? Is it the North Koreans or the Americans who are advertising for pharma
companies to produce anthrax and other bio-warfare pathogens in “batches of
thousands of liters”? Is it North Korea or the US that has employed biological,
chemical, and radioactive weapons in dozens of nations around the world? Who
dropped tens of millions of liters of dioxins on Vietnam? The North Koreans? Who
dispersed tens of thousands of tons of depleted uranium in Iraq, resulting in
hundreds of thousands of hideous malformed births that doctors describe as
“unidentifiable lumps of flesh”? Was that the North Koreans or the Americans?

Instead of focusing on the multitude of “maybes” in North Korea, why aren’t we focusing
on the multitude of certainties in the US and Israel? The reason is simple: free speech is
not what you think it is. I have stated this before, and I will re-state it another hundred
times in this series of books: The only value in freedom of speech depends entirely
on who controls the microphone, and the Americans and the Jewish-owned media
control the microphone. That is why the media are burdened every single day with
condemnations of Iran, Russia, China, but never a negative word about Israel or
the US, at least not negative where it counts. That is why Palestinians, Muslims,
Syrians, are daily berated and denigrated, but never Americans or Jews. The only value in
freedom of speech depends on who controls the microphone, and those who have it will
tell you only what they want you to hear or know, and will delete or censor whatever they
don’t want you to hear or know. And you will never know what they have not told
you. Think about that.

4.4. US Biowarfare on Cuba and The Americas

Zika Was Soaring Across Cuba. Few Outside the Country Knew. Source
100
One of the commonly-known (outside the US) biological warfare programs conducted by
the US, remarkable for its longevity, is the decades-long offensive attack on Cuba. The US
military and CIA conducted so many of these biological assaults that there is a
museum in Havana that provides substantial evidence of the many years of
biological warfare against this small country.Jeffrey St. Clair noted in an article a
few of these events, as follows: [25]

“CIA Denies Link to Cuban Swine Fever”, Newsday, January 15, 1977. Source

101
“In 1971 the first documented cases of swine fever in the western hemisphere showed up
in Cuba, resulting in the deaths of more than 500,000 hogs. Cuba accused the US of
importing that virus into the country, and a CIA agent later admitted that he delivered the
virus to Cuban exiles in Panama, who carried the virus into Cuba. The news was public,
but the US media ignored it. In 1981, Fidel Castro blamed an outbreak of dengue fever
in Cuba on the CIA. The fever killed 188 people, including 88 children. In 1988, a Cuban
exile leader named Eduardo Arocena admitted bringing some germs into Cuba in
1980. Another occasion involved an outbreak of thrips palmi, an insect that kills potato
crops, palm trees and other vegetation. Thrips first showed up in Cuba on December 12,
1996, following low-level flights over the island by US government spray planes. The US
was able to quash a United Nations investigation of the incident.”

But this was only a small part of America’s biological aggression against Cuba. In 1979,
the Washington Post published reports on a long-standing American bio-warfare program
against Cuban agriculture that had existed at least since 1962, including much involvement
by the CIA’s biological warfare section. And in 1980, the US believed it had discovered
a biological agent that would target ethnic Russians, and sent a ship from Florida
to Cuba on a mission to “carry some germs to Cuba to be used against the
Soviets”. And as recently as 1996 and 1997, the Cuban government was again accusing
the US of engaging in biological warfare by spraying Cuban crops with biological pathogens
during illegal “reconnaissance flights”. It was also definitively reported that during the
Cuban missile crisis, large numbers of chemical and biological weapons were loaded on
American military aircraft in preparation for use on Cuba.

It is also documented beyond dispute that the US conducted a decades-long

campaign [26] of biological warfare against little Cuba, [27] including the distribution of
hemorrhagic fever, and the swine flu that caused Cuba to kill all 500,000 pigs in the
country. The Americans not only lied about this for 70 years but accused Cuba of being “a
pariah state” with a biological warfare program. And not only Cuba. [28] The US has
deployed Chemical and Biological weapons on Canada, [29] the Philippines,
Puerto Rico, Colombia, [30] Brazil, [31] Vietnam, China, North Korea, Vietnam,
Laos, Cambodia and more. [32]

American bio-warfare efforts have also been launched on at least several other nations in
Central and South America, involving a number of viral pathogens, cancers and
chemicals. In his article, St. Clair referred to an epidemic of dengue fever that
erupted in Managua, Nicaragua, where about 50,000 people became seriously ill
and many died. The attack occurred during the CIA’s war against the Sandinista
government, where the outbreak immediately followed a series of low-level so-called
“reconnaissance flights” conducted by the Americans over Managua.It has also been
reliably reported by several sources that the US military has used Haiti as a kind of “open
season” biological lab, exposing the local population to almost everything imaginable, with
the US media keeping a very tight lid on information leakage. Even more reprehensible
was the treatment awarded to those Haitians who made the serious mistake of becoming
“boat people”, i.e., escaping their American pathology lab by emigrating in small
boats to the US. The US government deported most to Puerto Rico to be used as guinea
pigs and lab rats, where they would be out of view of Congress and the media and,
according to reports, having contained them in concentration camps to inflict upon them
102
whatever ‘scientific tests’ they avoided at home. In one case as recently as 1980,
hundreds of Haitian men in these detention camps developed full-size female
breasts after being injected repeatedly with unknown hormones by US military
physicians. The historical record tells us the same was done to the same people
in a publicly off-limits military base in Florida.

From the very earliest days of America’s bio-warfare experiments, US political and military
leaders, as well as CIA officials, made no effort to hide their interest in developing methods
of infecting individuals with cancer as a method of ridding themselves of national leaders
they didn’t like, a method with perfect deniability. There are the strange cases of the
more or less simultaneous occurrence of cancers among the leaders of South
American countries, coincidentally in each case, the infection of a national leader
the US despised and had tried to remove by several other means. We had Hugo
Chávez, the President of Venezuela, Argentina’s president Cristina Fernández de
Kirchner, Brazil’s president, Dilma Rousseff, Paraguay’s Fernando Lugo, and
Brazilian President, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. A former Brazilian President, speaking
of these cancers, said in an interview, “It is very hard to explain, even with the law
of probabilities, what has been happening to some leaders in Latin America. It’s
at the very least strange, very strange.”

The US media will no doubt classify this as yet another ‘conspiracy theory’, but you have
already read of Cuba’s Fidel Castro having entered the Guinness Book of Records for
surviving murder attempts against him – 638 in total – all by the US, and all unsuccessful,
and of the BBC having made a documentary film titled “638 Ways to Kill
Castro”. [33] [34] And of course, we have the CIA’s record of having assassinated by
various means about 150 political leaders in other nations, so denials by either Americans
or their media of murderous intent become rather pointless.

4.5. Vietnam and Agent Orange

103
Agent Orange is a highly toxic herbicide, defoliant and carcinogen consisting of equal
parts of two herbicides, 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D, intermixed with another especially lethal dioxin
named TCDD. The chemical was the creation of joint efforts between the British and
the Americans to design a bio-weapon that would totally exterminate an enemy’s
food crops. Some of the chemical’s components proved useful as commercial herbicides
and later entered the mass markets, though eventually proving too destructive to the
environment for continued use.

The US military was testing was testing Agent Orange as a bio-weapon in the
early 1940s, especially for rice crops, and began full-scale production for use
against Japan before the end of the war. And yes, they did. The US tested well over
1,000 similar compounds and conducted field trials of “the more promising
ones”, especially in Tanganyika and Kenya to assess the value of millions of liters of
carcinogenic herbicides in the eradication of (1) trees and bushes concealing terrorists and
(2) socialist governments.

Arthur Galston, TCDD’s developer, cited it as “perhaps the most toxic molecule ever
synthesized by man” but, according to Photoshop and Mr. Sanitise, its insertion into Agent
Orange was a mistake, an unintended manufacturing side effect, and present in only
“vanishingly small quantities”. Wikipedia informs us unspecified but no doubt fictitious
“internal memoranda” revealed that Monsanto, exercising its legendary prudence,
caution, and concern for human life, immediately informed the US military of the
contamination. Other, less fictitious, internal memoranda revealed that the US military
replied, “So what? That was the plan.”

Finally revealing the real truth of the Vietnam war, Wikipedia tells us “President Ngo Dinh
Diem of South Vietnam asked the United States to conduct aerial herbicide
spraying in his country”, his request launching a frantic policy debate in the White House
and the State and Defense Departments, who were very much against this kind of thing.
But, to help a friend, they reluctantly relented – and then dropped almost 100 million
liters, rendering half the country’s agricultural land and water unusable while
killing half the population and genetically deforming the offspring off the
survivors. The Americans will do anything to help a friend, but the Vietnamese should
maybe think more carefully about their requests.

The reason for pouring the extravagant amount of 100 million liters of Agent Orange onto
little Vietnam is that the Rand Corporation, in a competitive bid to oust Monsanto from
their title of Humanitarian of the Year, stated in a memo (5446-ISA/ARPA), “if [the VC]
are to be hampered by the crop destruction program, it will be necessary to
destroy large portions of the rural economy – probably 50% or more“. My research
has to date not uncovered any internal memoranda from the Vietnamese government
requesting this result. One other point needs to be made. Using the RAND memo above as
a reference, the officially-stated purpose of Agent Orange as a defoliant to
eliminate hiding places for Viet Cong soldiers was always a lie; the only purpose
of the chemical was to destroy Vietnam’s entire food supply and force a military
surrender from starvation. Of the millions of Vietnamese living in the contaminated

104
areas, many hundreds of thousands were reported suffering from severe malnutrition and
there is little doubt many or most of those died, but the Western media have
completely censored this topic, maintaining the fiction of Agent Orange and other
lethal herbicides as ‘defoliants’ to ‘deter snipers’.

The Vietnamese government of course filed claims in US courts for compensation and
damages for the irreparable environmental and human carnage resulting from those 100
million liters of dioxins poured on their country and its people. But, following the well-
established principles of rule of law, those US courts dismissed the claims. In their rulings,
they cited the principle of sovereign immunity, but they could just as well have applied the
doctrine of ‘self-inflicted injury’, since the Vietnamese government did, after all, ask the
United States to conduct aerial herbicide spraying in the country. So, it was really
their own fault anyway. And yes, that is sarcasm.

The Devastating Use of Agent Orange By the United States In Vietnam. Source

Just so it doesn’t go unsaid, some people promote the myth that dioxin has a short ‘half-
life’ and degrades quickly, and that is not true. The lethal dioxin components can
remain stable – and lethal – for 100 years or more, especially in underground
aquifers, resulting in health problems and birth defects for generations, either
through ingesting the contaminated water or from high concentrations in the
plant life. In many areas of the country, these dioxins are still at levels many hundreds of
times higher than the maximum ‘safe limits’ stated by medical experts. The Vietnamese
government estimates that nearly 500,000 people have died from Agent Orange
poisoning to date, and that more than half a million children have been born with
105
birth defects. The Red Cross of Vietnam estimates that perhaps 1 million people
are currently disabled or suffering serious health problems from Agent
Orange contamination. The US government of course refutes all these figures and claims
on the basis that “Vietnamese statistics are notoriously unreliable”, as are those of all other
nations presenting evidence of American military-flavored democracy.

4.6. Georgian Swine Flu in Russia and China

Can Pigs Fly? Georgian Swine Flu Now Spreading to Europe and China. Source

Serious outbreaks of swine flu have appeared in Russia, parts of Eastern Europe, and
China, [35] with strong evidence the pathogen emerged from and was distributed from
the US-funded Lugar biological warfare lab in Georgia. [36] Russia was convinced, and
with good reason, that this was another US biological warfare attack. [37] Top scientists
are saying that the current swine flu outbreak came from a vaccine lab, but you won’t hear
that in the controlled corporate media. [38] I will cover this in detail in a later Chapter.

The H1N1 swine flu pandemic in the US in 2009 appears to have been caused by
a leak from a US military biological lab, which was almost certainly why the CDC
refused for 6 months to even identify the pathogen or warn the citizenry, silently
permitting it to spread worldwide. This appears to have been the same pathogen
that hit Russia in 2016 from the US military’s Lugar bioweapons lab in Georgia.

106
4.7. Bat-Borne Diseases in Asia

A health worker wearing protective gear disposes biohazard waste from a Nipah virus isolation
centre at a government hospital in Kozikode after an outbreak. Photograph: AFP/Getty
Images. Source

As noted earlier, the US developed a rather sudden and extensive interest in bat-borne
viruses, especially coronaviruses, and in the transmission methods between bats and
humans. [39] Some of these studied involved the Lugar lab in Georgia while others were
conducted in China with the Wuhan lab. These studies and research include not only the
US military and the usual collaborators, but the US CDC and in this case Duke
University, some of which were conducted in cooperation with the government in
Kazakhstan.

107
4.8. Gruinard Island – Scotland

Gruinard Island – Fire on island used for Anthrax experiments in Scotland, via BBC. Source

The official Government text, Medical Aspects of Biological

Warfare (2007), [40] makes several interesting admissions. One is that the US tested
explosive anti-personnel munitions containing anthrax on Gruinard Island near the coast
of Scotland in 1942. [41] It notes that “These experiments successfully produced anthrax
among targeted sheep”.

In fact, the experiment was so successful the island was quarantined for almost
50 years, and was finally partially decontaminated only in 1986, using “2,000 tons
of seawater and 280 tons of formaldehyde”. [42] Decontaminated or not, the
island still boasts neither sheep nor humans as residents. No word on whether
Scotland provided informed consent.

(You can download the full .pdf file at the reference above).

108
4.9. The Secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit

A 65-year-old mystery was finally solved by investigative journalists. In 1951, almost the
entire population of the town of Pont-Saint-Esprit in Southern France were driven to mass
hysteria and insanity, hallucinations and suicide. [43] [44] A great many people died and
dozens were put into strait jackets and sent to mental asylums, in one of the world’s most
bizarre mysteries. Many people tried to fly out of windows or from roofs of buildings.

One man shouted “I am a plane” before jumping out of a second-floor window and breaking
his legs. One man tried to drown himself, screaming that his belly was being eaten by
snakes. An 11-year-old boy tried to strangle his grandmother. Another saw his heart
escaping through his feet and begged a doctor to put it back. Time magazine wrote at
the time: “Among the stricken, delirium rose: patients thrashed wildly on their beds,
screaming that red flowers were blossoming from their bodies, that their heads had turned
to molten lead”. In the end, most everyone either died or was committed to a mental
institution. For decades it was assumed that the local bread had been unwittingly poisoned
with a psychedelic compound, speculating that the largest local baker had unwittingly
contaminated his flour with ergot, a hallucinogenic mold that sometimes infects rye
grain. But a journalist uncovered evidence that the tragic event resulted from a
covert experiment by the CIA and the US Army’s top-secret Special Operations
Division, where CIA operatives peppered local food with massive amounts of LSD
as part of a mind control experiment.

For Pont St. Esprit, the CIA sent scientists from Sandoz, the supplier of the LSD, to concoct
a plausible story as to the cause. The CIA concocted and executed many such plans to
infect many locations both in the US and in foreign countries with a wide variety of
pathogens. The journalist referred to above, was investigating the death of Frank
Olson, the CIA biochemist we have already met, and discovered transcripts of a
conversation between a CIA agent and a Sandoz pharmaceutical official who
mentioned the “secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit”, explaining that it was not caused by
mold but by LSD. Two colleagues of Olson further confirmed that that the Pont-Saint-
109
Esprit incident was part of a mind control experiment run by the CIA and US army, having
sprayed LSD into the air throughout the town as well as contaminating local bread and
other food products. The final proof was in a White House document sent to members of
the Rockefeller Commission during its investigation of CIA abuses. The document contained
the names of those employed by the CIA for this job, and made direct reference to the
“Pont St. Esprit incident”, and the culprit was of course none other than Sidney
Gottlieb.

By 1950 the US military and CIA had already produced well-developed plans to ‘outsource’
the field testing of various pathogens to other nations, friend and enemy alike, with much
of the surreptitious testing of LSD and other hallucinogens conducted in Europe and Asia
under the code names of “Project Third Chance” and “Project Derby Hat”. The first
Project was targeting countries in Europe while the second was directed at Asia but China
in particular. You may care to read “Operation Delerium” by the New Yorker Magazine. [45]

4.10. Operation Third Chance

The “ego dissolution” that comes along with taking LSD: Your sense of self is altered, in that your
consciousness expands beyond yourself. Source

This was part of an extensive operation to affect individuals (in other countries) with various
biological pathogens and chemical substances and to assess their reactions. In this

110
instance, team members flew to Europe for a three-month mission called
Operation THIRD CHANCE, which was to dose unwitting people with LSD and
measure the results. In each country, the team joined with local operatives and
methodically rehearsed scenarios to lure subjects to a spot where they could be given the
chemical. [46]

From official documents of 1960: The Army Assistant Chief-of-Staff for Intelligence (ACSI)
authorizes field testing of LSD in Europe and the Far East. [47] Testing of the European
population is code named Project THIRD CHANCE; testing of the Asian population
is code named Project DERBY HAT.

4.10.1. Operation Derby Hat (Biological experiments in China and Asia)

This Operation must have been considered especially politically-dangerous since the
Internet appears to have been scrubbed totally clean of any information on this US military
project in Asia. One website made repeated requests under the FOIA for information: “This
is a [repeated] request under the Freedom of Information Act. I hereby request the
following records: All records pertaining to “Operation Derby Hat” between the years 1960
– 1965.” Despite the repeated requests, there was no response. Finally, a response did
come: From: U.S. Army Medical Department, Tripler Army Medical Center: No Responsive
Documents. [48] In other words, either the information law is being flouted, or all the
documents have been destroyed.

111
4.10.2. Okinawa

Okinawan women hold placards reading ‘Remove poison gas’ at a Japan Mothers Association
meeting in 1969 in Tokyo, just weeks after a poison gas accident at a U.S. installation on the island. |
KYODO

There is still much controversy over the biological and chemical tests conducted by the US
military in Okinawa and Taiwan, as part of Project 112, to which I have referred in an
earlier essay. One of the incriminating documents is “An Organizational History of the 267th
Chemical company”. According to the document, the 267th Chemical Company was
activated on Okinawa on December 1, 1962 as the 267th Chemical Platoon. During this
deployment, “Unit personnel were actively engaged in preparing RED HAT area, site 2 for
the receipt and storage of first increment items, [shipment] “YBA”, DOD Project 112.” The
company received further shipments, code named YBB and YBF, which according to
declassified documents also included sarin, VX, and mustard gas. [49] [50]

The late author Sheldon H. Harris in his book “Factories of Death: Japanese Biological
Warfare, 1932–1945, and the American cover up” wrote about Project 112: The test
program was considered by the Chemical Corps to be “an ambitious one”, with
tests were designed to cover “not only trials at sea, but Arctic and tropical
environmental tests as well.” The tests were conducted at what were termed
“satellite sites”, some located in the US but many in foreign countries, and were
aimed at humans, animals, and plants. It is known that tests were undertaken in Egypt,
Liberia, South Korea, and in Japan’s satellite province of Okinawa. Biological warfare
experts conducted “field tests” for wheat rust and rice blast disease in Okinawa and other
locations, apparently meeting with success and a significant increase in funding. The
112
money was devoted largely to developing “technical advice on the conduct of
defoliation and anti-crop activities in Southeast Asia”. Early in this program, the
Chemical Corps were apparently negotiating contracts for over 1,000 chemical and
biological toxins and defoliants, largely based on their success in Okinawa. New documents
have disclosed that the U.S. military tested biological weapons in Okinawa in the early
1960s, when the prefecture was still under US rule. Many dozens of these tests were
conducted in both Okinawa and Taiwan.

4.10.3 Afghanistan

President Donald Trump speaks at a meeting with the Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, in the
Oval Office on July 22, 2019. Mark Wilson/Getty Images. Source

When Donald Trump was US President, he claimed [51] he could kill the entire
population of Afghanistan within days. [52] “Afghanistan would be wiped off the
face of the Earth. It would be gone and this is not using nuclear. It would be over
in – literally, in 10 days.” Biological weapons would seem the only
alternative. Hemorrhagic Fever and Hantavirus worked for the US in North Korea;
perhaps also Afghanistan. Mr. Trump later denied intention to carry out his threat, but
let’s dispense with the fiction of the US having no biological weapons, of Fort Detrick and
the 400 foreign bio-labs performing only benevolent “peace medicine” functions.

113
“We could win that war so fast if I wanted to kill 10 million people … which I don’t. I’m not
looking to kill a big portion of that country [Afghanistan],” “I have plans on Afghanistan
that, if I wanted to win that war, Afghanistan would be wiped off the face of the Earth. It
would be gone,” “It would be over in — literally, in 10 days. And I don’t want to do — I
don’t want to go that route.” (ABC July 24.2019) “As I’ve said, and I’ll say it any number
of times – and this is not using nuclear – we could win that war in a week if we wanted
to fight it, but I’m not looking to kill 10 million people,” (quoted by Press TV, Aug
21.2019) You can also watch the video at this link: [53]

4.11. Ethnic-specific bioweapons

President George W. Bush signs S.15-Project Bioshield Act of 2004, in the Rose Garden Wednesday,
July 21, 2004. Source

It appears increasingly true that much of the almost hysterical attention suddenly being
paid by the US military to the “global fight against contagious diseases” is related to the
production of ethnic-specific bioweapons, a thought that has been in the mind of the US
Department of Defense for many decades now. One author noted that Then-President
Bush’s “Project BioShield” [54] [55] [56] was presented as part of the War on Terrorism
but was instead almost entirely an offensive biological weapons program. This was the
main reason that the entire field of microbiology – civilian as well as military –
relating to diseases of all kinds – was reclassified by the Pentagon as “biological
warfare” and transferred to the US Army Medical Research Institute at Fort
Detrick, Maryland, and the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases
in Bethesda, Md., location of the military’s Walter Reed Hospital and research
division.

114
4.12. More Secret US Government Projects

Source

Information on these US government programs is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain.

There must be an army of officers scouring the Internet to delete any reference to these
projects, and increasingly any data obtained under FOIA request is so heavily blacked out
(redacted) as to be useless. In prior essays I have listed many of these secret
Projects, Operations, and Programs, but there are many hundreds more that have
not been openly discussed and, with the extreme censorship existing today, it is
unlikely that further information will appear in the public realm. Nevertheless, here
a brief listing, from one source, of some Projects that may be of interest. [57] Not all are
related to biological pathogens and warfare, but many are.

Project Avalon (Directed Energy Weapons): Microwave, Laser, Sonic, Scalar

weapons; Agent Blue (toxic herbicide and defoliant); Agent Orange (toxic herbicide and
defoliant); Project Artichoke, interrogation methods, mind control; Project Bluebird,
interrogation methods, mind control; Project AVIARY, non-lethal mind
control; Operation Pique, non-lethal mind control; Project Blue Beam, involve people
as in a “rapture”; Project Camelot, mind control; Project CASTIGATE, trauma-based
mind control; Project Monarch, trauma-based mind control; Project CHAOS, mind
control; Project Chatter, biological mind control; Project MKCHICKWIT, chemical and
biological mind control; Project Cloverleaf, Stealth Genocide Program; COINTELPRO,
Counterintelligence Program conducted by the FBI to discredit and neutralize political
dissention; Project Echelon, commercial espionage; Project FUBELT, military

115
coup; PROJECT GRILL FLAME, CIA use of psychics; Operation Stargate; Operation
Gondola Wish, Project L.U.C.I.D., MK Delta, Mind Control; MK Naomi, Mind
Control; Project MK Often, toxicological effects of biotics and drugs on humans; Project
Monarch mind control; Phoenix Project Part 2, mass mind control; Project Pegasus,
mind control; Project Prism, espionage; Operation CONDOR, Operation
Doormouse; Operation Gladio; Operation Jefferson; Operation Dirty
Trick; Operation Keelhaul, genocide; Operation Garden Potter; Operation Garden
Plot; Operation MILABS; Operation Midnight Climax; Operation Mind
Control; Operation Northwoods; Operation Pique (CIA); Operation Red
Rock; Operation REX 84; Project Mannequin; Project Montauk; Project Soul
Catcher; Operation Starfish Prime; Operation Tailwind.

116
NOTES

[1] US rejection sets biological weapons treaty adrift

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(01)05589-1/fulltext

[2] US rejects bioweapons agreement

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1076-us-rejects-bioweapons-agreement/

[3] Bioweapons research is banned by an international treaty – but nobody is checking for violations
https://theconversation.com/bioweapons-research-is-banned-by-an-international-treaty-but-nobody-
is-checking-for-violations-163472

[4] US rejects stronger bioweapons treaty

https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt0901-793

[5] US rejects biological weapons convention protocol

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1173329/

[6] U.S. rejects biological weapons checks

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-arms-biological-idUSTRE5B82DG20091209

[7] The U.S. is the World Leader of Bio-Weapons Research, Production, and Use Against Mankind
(Foreign deployment)
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/02/gary-d-barnett/the-u-s-is-the-world-leader-of-bio-weapons-
research-production-and-use-against-mankind/

[8] US Military Bio-labs in Ukraine, Production of Bio-weapons and “Disease Causing Agents”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-military-bio-labs-in-ukraine-production-of-bio-weapons-and-
disease-causing-agents/5605307

[9] Air raid on Bari

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_raid_on_Bari

[10] How a WWII Disaster—and Cover-up—Led to a Cancer Treatment Breakthrough

https://www.history.com/news/wwii-disaster-bari-mustard-gas

[11]In World War II, The U.S. Sent Mustard Gas To Italy (And Killed Its Own Troops)
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/world-war-ii-us-sent-mustard-gas-italy-and-killed-its-own-
troops-91311

117
[12] How a chemical weapons disaster in World War II led to a U.S. cover-up
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/bombing-and-breakthrough-180975505/

[13] US biological weapons reportedly tested in Japan’s Okinawa in 1960s

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-01-12/an-japan-okinawa-weapons/5196224

[14] US biological weapons tested in Okinawa in 1960s: Report

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/us-biological-weapons-tested-in-okinawa-in-1960s-report

[15] U.S. Army tested biological weapons in Okinawa

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/01/12/national/u-s-army-tested-biological-weapons-in-
okinawa/

[16] The US Used Biological Warfare Against Mainland China in the 1950s
https://www.anti-empire.com/us-used-horrific-biological-weapons-in-the-korean-war/

[17] READ LONG-SUPPRESSED OFFICIAL REPORT ON US BIOLOGICAL WARFARE IN NORTH

KOREA
https://shadowproof.com/2018/02/22/read-long-suppressed-official-report-us-biological-warfare-
north-korea/

[18] Report of the International Scientific Commission for the investigation of the facts concerning
bacterial warfare in Korea and China
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4334133-ISC-Full-Report-Pub-Copy.html

[19] CIA, MKULTRA and the Cover-up of U.S. Germ Warfare in the Korean War
https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/11/21/cia-mkultra-and-the-cover-up-of-u-s-germ-warfare-in-
the-korean-war/

[20] U.S. Dropped Fleas With Bubonic Plague on North Korea

https://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-drops-fleas-with-bubonic-plague-on-north-korea/5474089

[21] Doctors still trying to diagnose mysteries of hantavirus

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2012-sep-10-la-me-hantavirus-mystery-20120911-
story.html

[22] 1993 Four Corners hantavirus outbreak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Four_Corners_hantavirus_outbreak

[23] This Must Be The Place

https://archive.org/details/this-must-be-the-place

[24] This Must be the Place: How the U.S. Waged Germ Wafare in the Korean War and Denied it Ever
Since
https://books.google.fr/books/about/This_Must_be_the_Place.html?id=AlvnnQEACAAJ&redir_esc=
y

[25] Germ War: the US Record

https://www.counterpunch.org/2013/09/03/germ-war-the-us-record-2/

[26] Cuba
http://www.internationalist.org/biowarfareagainstcuba0503.html

[27] Cuba
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-wuhan-virus-cia-biological-warfare-cuba/5706466

118
[28] And not only Cuba
William Blum, Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II [Common
Courage Press, 1995]).

[29] America Has Deployed Chemical and Biological Weapons on the Philippines, Puerto Rico,
Vietnam, China, North Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and More
http://www.alternet.org/world/america-has-deployed-chemical-and-biological-weapons-philippines-
puerto-rico-vietnam-china

[30] Colombia
https://www.counterpunch.org/2002/12/24/biowarfare-in-colombia/

[31] Brazil
http://scielo.iec.gov.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-49742016000300519

[32] A Short History of Bio-Chemical Weapons

http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/09/02/a-short-history-of-bio-chemical-weapons/

[33] 638 ways to kill Castro

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/aug/03/cuba.duncancampbell2

[34] How Castro survived 638 very cunning assassination attempts

https://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/how-castro-survived-638-assassination-
attempts/8064788

[35] Can Pigs Fly? Georgian Swine Flu Now Spreading to Europe and China
https://journal-neo.org/2018/10/24/can-pigs-fly-georgian-swine-flu-now-spreading-to-europe-and-
china/

[36] Lugar bioweapons lab

https://eurasianet.org/russia-sees-american-georgian-flu-conspiracy/

[37] Russia Sees American-Georgian Flu Conspiracy

https://eurasianet.org/russia-sees-american-georgian-flu-conspiracy/

[38] Episode 086 – Medical Martial Law 05/17/2009

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-086-medical-martial-law/

[39] Bats, gene-editing and bioweapons

https://www.unz.com/wwebb/bats-gene-editing-and-bioweapons-recent-darpa-experiments-raise-
concerns-amid-coronavirus-outbreak/

[40] Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare

https://archive.org/details/BioBook4

[41] The mystery of Anthrax Island and the seeds of death

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-60483849

[42] Gruinard Island: Fire on island used for Anthrax experiments

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-60892350

[43] French bread spiked with LSD in CIA experiment

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/7415082/French-bread-spiked-with-
LSD-in-CIA-experiment.html

[44] 1951: Pont-Saint-Esprit — the Devil’s Bread or a Disastrous CIA–LSD Experiment?

https://ahrp.org/1951-pont-saint-esprit-the-devils-bread-or-a-disastrous-cia-lsd-experiment/

119
[45] Operation Delerium
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/12/17/operation-delirium

[46] High Anxiety: LSD in the Cold War

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/high-anxiety-lsd-in-the-cold-war

[47] A History Of US Secret Human Experimentation

https://rense.com/general36/history.htm

[48] Operation Derby Hat

https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/operation-derby-hat-44582/

[49] Poisoning The Pacific: Author Releases Uncovered Documents On Toxic Pollutants At U.S. Bases
https://cbrnecentral.com/poisoning-the-pacific-author-releases-uncovered-documents-on-toxic-
pollutants-at-u-s-bases/25596/

[50] Project 112 – Extracontinental Site 2, Okinawa

https://www.liquisearch.com/project_112/extracontinental_site_2_okinawa

[51] Did Trump Tacitly Threaten to Use Biological Weapons to Exterminate 10 Million?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/did-trump-tacitly-threaten-use-biological-weapons/5687936

[52] Donald Trump threatens Afghanistan that he could wipe it ‘off the face of the Earth’
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-24/why-did-donald-trump-say-he-could-kill-10-million-
afghans/11342794

[53] https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2019/08/21/604070/US-President-Donald-Trump-
Afghanistan-war-win-without-nuclear-weapons

[54] Reinventing Project BioShield

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.333.6047.1216

[55] Project Bioshield Act

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Bioshield_Act

[56] President Bush Signs 10-Year, $5.6 Billion Project BioShield Act
https://californiahealthline.org/morning-breakout/president-bush-signs-10year-56-billion-project-
bioshield-act-into-law/

120
5. Chapter 5 – The WHO – Depopulation is Reality

CONTENT

5.1. Introduction

5.2. And Polio, Too . . .

5.3. And Meningitis . . .

5.4. And EBOLA . . .

5.5. A Chinese “Experiment”?

5.6. Back to Depopulation

5.7. A Successful Genocide

5.8. And Yet More . . .

5.9. Epilogue

121
5.1. Introduction

Doctors in Kenya have accused UNICEF, the World Health Organization and the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation of secretly trying to sterilise millions of women in Africa via a tetanus vaccine
program. Source

This qualifies as one of the largest false-flag operations in human history, a story
that almost beggars belief but with the facts too clear to refute. It began its life
as yet another “conspiracy theory” but soon lost that label because overwhelming
and irrefutable evidence was uncovered which moved this series of events
from ‘conspiracy’ mode to ‘proven fact’ mode.

The story is not complicated. During the early 1990s, the WHO had organised and
been overseeing massive tetanus vaccination campaigns in Nicaragua, Mexico, the
Philippines, Tanzania, Nigeria, and a few other countries. Shortly after the initiation of
these programs, concerns began to emerge about spontaneous abortions and
other complications arising exclusively within the vaccinated populations.Tetanus
is a disease whose onset we often associate with stepping on a rusty nail or similar event.
It should be clear that men and children would be at least as likely, if not more likely, to
encounter this circumstance than would women, and perhaps careless children more than
adults, but the WHO vaccination program was directed only to females from 15 to
45 years of age – in other words, child-bearing ages. In Nicaragua, the targets
were females from 12 to 49 years of age. Also, a single tetanus shot is universally
accepted as sufficient to provide protection for ten years or more, but the WHO
inexplicably insisted on vaccinating these women five times within several
months. Mexico was suspicious of the WHO tetanus campaign because it excluded
all males and children and called for injections of the vaccine only in females of
child-bearing age, and insisted on the multiple vaccinations. Based on its
suspicions, Mexico had vials of the tetanus vaccine analyzed, and it was discovered
122
the WHO’s “tetanus” vaccine contained the Human chorionic gonadotrophin
(hCG) hormone.

This hormone is critical to the female body during pregnancy. It causes the release of other
hormones that prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilised egg. Without
it, a woman’s body is unable to sustain a pregnancy and the fetus will be
aborted. This hormone was injected into the subjects along with the tetanus serum,
causing a female body to then recognise both as foreign agents and to develop antibodies
to destroy either if they were to ever appear in the body in the future. Upon becoming
pregnant, a woman’s body would fail to recognize hCG as a friend and would
produce anti-hCG antibodies, the prior vaccination now inducing her body’s
immune system to attack the hormone that is needed to bring an unborn child to
term, preventing subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which is necessary
to sustain them. This means each woman who received the WHO tetanus
inoculation was vaccinated not only against tetanus but also against
pregnancy. [1] [2] [3]

Note that Mexico resisted population control policies, but the World Bank “insisted the country
do something to cut down its population growth.”. Source

123
The Mexican authorities immediately notified representatives in more than 60 countries,
and it was discovered that similar tetanus vaccines laced with hCG were used in the
other countries as well. When this information became public, the WHO at first denied
the facts and disparaged the results of the initial tests, assuming an offensive and
repugnant stand, mocking and ridiculing the nations that had performed the tests
and revealed the contamination, condemning them as incompetent, having
“unsuitable” testing laboratories, and using improper samples or
procedures. WHO officials claimed these nations had “Not the right kind of lab to do
the test. The labs know only how to test urine samples . . .” Then, in the face of
repeated similar discoveries, the WHO finally admitted that “perhaps” “a small
percentage” of the vaccines had been “contaminated” with hCG, but stated that it
was “harmless”. When Nigeria discovered the same hormone in the vaccine, Nigerian
physicians reported that WHO doctors assured them the hCG hormone “would
have no effect on human reproduction” – statements that they knew to be false.

This is the standard response by Western agencies, governments, and corporations, when
caught with adulterated products. When Coca-Cola’s drinks in China were found to
contain frightening levels of pesticides and chlorine, the immediate accusation
was that China’s biological laboratories were all incompetent. When Nestle’s
noodles in India were found to contain dangerously toxic amounts of lead, India’s
laboratories were all incompetent. The next step is to carefully produce a few samples
known to be uncontaminated, provide them to an “independent” laboratory that inevitably
pronounces them clean, then move the story off the front page.

However, following this revelation, and the WHO’s admission of “contamination”, each
nation had extensive tests conducted by expert independent labs, and in all cases the hCG
hormone was identified as existing in the tetanus vaccination serum. The WHO eventually
went silent and discontinued their program, but by this time about 150 million
women had been vaccinated – and rendered sterile.

124
One important fact is that the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used
in this project were developed, produced, and distributed in secrecy and that none
had ever been tested or licensed for use, sale, or distribution, anywhere in the
world. The companies that produced them were the Rothschild-owned Connaught
Laboratories in Canada, Intervex from Canada, and Australia’s CSL
Laboratories. Connaught is the same firm that, along with the Canadian Red
Cross, knowingly distributed AIDS-contaminated blood products for several years
during the 1980s, a criminal organisation that should have been executed along
with its owners. You can read the essay, “Canada’s Tainted Blood”. [4] Following
its outstanding criminal history in Canada, Connaught was sold to Rothschild and
now forms part of his Sanofi Group, the criminality clearly continuing and now on
a worldwide scale. Further damning evidence that the Western media
censored, was the fact that the WHO had been actively involved for more than 20
years prior in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to
tetanus toxoid as a carrier – precisely the same combination as in these
vaccines. According to the WHO’s own reports, they had spent 20 years and more
than $400 million on this specific sterilisation research. More than 20 research
articles have been written on this subject, many of these by the WHO itself, that document
in detail the WHO’s attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus
toxoid.

PubMed reported that in 1972 the WHO established a special “Task Force on Vaccines
for Fertility Regulation” (read sterilisation), which consisted of “international,
multidisciplinary groups of scientists and clinicians collaborating in research” on the specific
goal of [finding] “substances capable of mounting antifertility responses in
women“. And again, “Over the past 18 years, the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for
Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the
development of birth control vaccines…” [5] You can’t be more clear than that.I
examined carefully the WHO website and discovered more than a dozen articles written
by WHO researchers, documenting in detail the WHO’s attempts to create an anti-
fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as a carrier. One need only search the WHO
website for hCG to find the reports. Some leading articles included:

“Clinical profile and Toxicology Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,”
Contraception, February, 1976, pp. 253-268. “Observations on the antigenicity and clinical
effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: B-subunit of human chorionic
gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,” Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-
335. “Anti-hCG Vaccines are in Clinical Trials,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology,
Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 123-126.

Europe PubMedCentral published articles specifically on the antigenicity effects

of hCG in tetanus toxoid. For those who don’t know, “antigenicity” is the capacity
of a substance to produce an immune response, in this case whether the hCG in
the vaccination would be sufficient to render females “immune” to pregnancy:

“Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine:

B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,” Fertility and Sterility,
October 1980, pp. 328-335. And: “Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of
a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin
linked to tetanus toxoid. [6] The Lancet published “Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World
125
Health Organisation Birth Control Vaccine” June 11 1988, pp. 1295-1298. “Vaccines
for Fertility Regulation,” Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction,
Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and
Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988). [7] The US
NCBI published an article essentially boasting of “A vaccine that prevents pregnancy
in women“. [8] The Lancet published records of a WHO “Phase 1 Clinical trials of this
same vaccine, [9] the NCBI doing the same. [10] Europe PubMed Central published
another article confirming the success of the trials. [11] PubMed also published a review
of three such vaccines developed, which displayed “progressively better attributes” in
sterilising women, stating that the clinical trials proved the “effective prevention of
pregnancy” in sexually active women of proven fertility. [12]

Worthy of note is that both the WHO and these august medical journals told one
huge lie. According to PubMed, “clinical trials have proven … the reversibility of the
anti-hCG vaccine(s) in women”. Europe PubMed Central stated that “the vaccine
prevents pregnancy” but that clinical trials “indicated the reversibility” of these
vaccines. (See references 4 and 5). However, what they didn’t mention was that the
“reversibility” resulted merely from the immunisation naturally wearing off after
a period of time, and that this was for a single vaccination.

They didn’t mention that the reason for the 5 injections was to make all females
permanently “immune” to pregnancy.

The WHO has been in the depopulation business for decades. Source

126
As early as 1978, the WHO was actively exploring ways to eradicate much of the
population of the Third World. A paper published by the WHO [13] was titled,
“Evaluating … placental antigen vaccines for fertility regulation”. The paper
acknowledged “substantial progress” in its worldwide eugenics program of
culling non-whites, but yet identified “an urgent need for a greater variety of
methods” of preventing fertility, and gushed over the fact that “immunisation as
a prophylactic measure is now so widely accepted”, that the employment of
sterilisation vaccines would be widely appealing (to those dispensing the
vaccines) and would offer “great ease of delivery”.

If that isn’t clear, the WHO is saying that vaccinations for other purposes –
protection against diseases – are so common and widely-accepted, that
inoculation is probably the easiest way to sterilise the populations of undeveloped
countries. The paper then notes the accumulation of evidence that “there exist proteins
specific to the reproductive system” which “could be blocked” by vaccinations and provide
a new method of “fertility regulation”. Among the stated advantages of a sterilisation
vaccine is that it could prevent or disrupt implantation of the fertilised egg onto the uterus
wall, and thereby guarantee that every conception would result in a miscarriage or
spontaneous abortion, i.e., an anti-hCG vaccine. The paper continues:

“Testing … will reveal whether a single injection is sufficient to achieve the

desired level of immunization, or whether several boosting injections will be
required. The main desired effect is to achieve a degree of immunization sufficient
to: (a) neutralize the hormonal activity of hCG in vivo; and (b) prevent or disrupt
implantation at a very early stage of pregnancy. It is not yet established whether
immunization with the β hCG peptide conjugate will cause an irreversible
biological neutralization of hCG … This will probably vary from individual to
individual. In the first case, the indication for immunization will be restricted to
sterilization, whereas in the second eventuality … immunization may be
considered as a long-lasting but reversible anti-fertility measure.”

On August 17-18, 1992, the WHO produced a report titled “Fertility Regulating
Vaccines”, resulting from a large meeting in Geneva of scientists and ‘women’s health
advocates’ “to review the current status of the development of fertility regulating vaccines.”
The meeting was from a joint Special Program of research in reproduction of
the UNDP, UNFPA, the WHO and the World Bank. The report stated, “… applied research
on FRV’s (fertility-regulating vaccines) has been going on for more than twenty years …”,
and discussed not only the anti-hCG vaccines already receiving clinical trials, but the
development of other vaccines such as an anti-GnRH vaccine that would extend the
temporary infertility due to breast-feeding.

Even more chilling is that one WHO report – still on their website – discusses the
certainty of the vaccinations causing spontaneous abortions since some
significant number of the inoculated females would be pregnant at the time of
vaccination. The report offers no commentary on this. It was clear the WHO had
no intention of performing pregnancy tests prior to administering the vaccines,

127
thus coldly accepting the fact that they would be killing at least some millions of
unborn fetuses.

This vaccine was also being field-tested at the time, with the possible intention of employing
both antigens in the same vaccine on the assumption that a single vaccine might not
sterilise all victims. They recognised the dangers of administering such a vaccine to
women who were already pregnant, and expressed awareness the antibodies
would almost certainly be present in the milk and might therefore render the
infants permanently sterile as well – with the massive understatement that this
“might not be acceptable to all potential users …”

From the outset, WHO planners realised that during mass vaccinations, many
pregnant women would also be inoculated with the anti-hCG serum, which would
inevitably result not only in sterilisation, miscarriages and spontaneous abortions
but also incurable autoimmune disorders and birth defects.

Critical Periods of Prenatal Development. This image summarizes the three developmental
periods in prenatal development. The blue images indicate where major development is happening
and the aqua indicate where refinement is happening. As shown, the majority of organs are
particularly susceptible during the embryonic period. The central nervous system still continues to
develop in major ways through the fetal period as well. Source

The same paper went on to state, “In addition to women being immunized
inadvertently during an established pregnancy, fetuses could be exposed to
potential teratological effects of immunization …”. In other words, WHO staff would

128
freely inoculate pregnant women, those embryos or fetuses not spontaneously
aborting would experience pathological growth from which would result various
undefined birth defects.

The WHO was not researching ‘reproductive health’, but reproductive

impossibility, and their tetanus-hCG vaccine is not in any sense ‘regulating’ the
fertility of women but rendering their fertility biologically impossible, which is not
quite the same thing. Their own paper stated the vaccination likely “will cause an
irreversible biological neutralization of hCG”, which means the permanent
sterilisation of innocent women who agreed to receive tetanus shots.

Try to understand what this means: the WHO was for decades receiving hundreds
of millions of dollars in funding (largely through Bill Gates) for research and
testing, to produce a vaccine that would make a woman’s immune system attack
and destroy her own babies in the womb, a vaccine they would surreptitiously
combine with a tetanus vaccination without informing the victims. To say their
deceit was successful would be an understatement. The WHO inoculated approximately
150 million women in 52 countries with this vaccine, permanently sterilising the
entire lot of them without their knowledge or consent.

To recap:

It was only when an enormous number of women in all countries experienced vaginal
bleeding and miscarriages immediately after the vaccinations, that the hormone additive
was discovered as the cause. Suspicions were aroused when the WHO selected only
females of child-bearing age and further specified the unheard-of practice of five
multiple injections over a three-month period, but the health officials in these
undeveloped countries still had faith in the white man’s medicine.

When the discovery of the hCG was made, many nations enacted immediate legal
restraining orders against WHO and UNICEF vaccine programs. WHO and UNICEF
officials said the “grave allegations” were “not backed up by evidence”, which
was nonsense. UNICEF, USAID and the WHO refused to address the evidence like
vaginal bleeding, miscarriages and spontaneous abortions. They also refused to discuss the
reasons for a series of five closely-spaced vaccinations when one had always been
sufficient for tetanus, ignoring the content of their own published papers stating that
multiple injections of a tetanus-hCG vaccine would be necessary for effective sterilisation.

When faced with documented results, WHO officials admitted the hormone did indeed exist
“in small amounts” in “some” of the vaccine material, but that this was an inconsequential
result of “accidental contamination”. Nobody at the WHO attempted to explain the
source of the hCG hormone in sufficient volume to contaminate about 750 million
doses of a vaccine, nor how that “contamination” could “accidentally” have

129
inserted itself into all those vaccines. Anyone familiar with large-scale vaccine or drug
manufacture knows that the process is mechanical and fully-automated, essentially a
closed system. It is not possible in such an environment to introduce contaminants
of any kind, unless done deliberately. And the amount of hCG necessary to
contaminate 750 million doses of a vaccine would have to consist of tens of
thousands of liters, hardly ‘small amounts’. The Lancet reported that the US National
Institute of Health supplied much of the hCG hormone for WHO experiments and testing.
For the NIH to have submitted this amount of hormone to Canada, where Connaught’s labs
are located, would absolutely have attracted the attention of Canada’s customs officials
and thus Canada’s national government, which has to mean that Canada was fully
aware of what was happening, and why. Let me state again that this vaccine was
created surreptitiously, was never declared, was never tested, and was never
approved for use on humans.

The WHO went silent for a while, but in 2015, Vatican Radio charged that the UN
organisations WHO and UNICEF were again executing vast international programs
of depopulating the earth by using vaccines to surreptitiously sterilise women in
Third World countries, this time in Kenya. It stated that “Catholic Bishops in Kenya
have been opposed to the nationwide Tetanus Vaccination Campaign targeting 2.3 million
Kenyan women and girls of reproductive age between 15-49 years, terming the campaign
a secret government plan to sterilize women and control population growth”. [14] In May
of 2018, it was reported that fertility-regulating vaccines were being used in
India. [15] The media were too busy at the time telling us of the evils of Iran, to
notice the small issue of Rothschild manufacturing 750 million doses of a vaccine
meant to sterilise 150 million women. As I’ve often mentioned elsewhere, the
Western (Jewish) media are excessively fond of demonising Hitler, but Hitler
didn’t sterilise 150 million Jews without their knowledge or consent. Yet
Rothschild (a Jew) produced the vaccine to sterilise 150 million women without
their knowledge, so where is the moral outrage against the Jews?

5.2. And Polio, Too . . .

Polio workers hold up a banner during a 5-day campaign to vaccinate 2.6 million children in Kenya
in July 2019. ©WHO/Kenya. Source
130
Something similar is true for polio. Few people are aware that polio cases in the world
today no longer result from any natural spread of the disease but are now the
result of WHO vaccination campaigns. [16] The WHO’s cheap and easily-
administered oral polio vaccines have proven responsible for the increasing
recurrence of polio in many countries. An independent medical group tasked with
monitoring these events, wrote that polio [because of the WHO practices] was
“spreading uncontrolled in West Africa, bursting geographical boundaries and raising
fundamental questions . . .” It further described the WHO’s attitude toward terminating
this pandemic of vaccine-caused polio cases as “relaxed”. I might have used a stronger
term.

Banned in Western countries and Israel, the oral polio vaccine is not trusted in poor countries and is
often met with resistance among parents in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan where they are
forced upon the population at gunpoint. Photo by Asif Hassan/ AFP. Source

In 2009, there was a spreading outbreak of Polio in Nigeria, a direct result of yet
another WHO vaccination program, this time directly linked to the vaccine which
was made from a live polio virus which always carries a risk of causing polio
instead of protecting against it – as the Americans learned to their chagrin many years
ago. Today in the West, polio vaccines are made from a killed virus that cannot cause polio.
This latest WHO-sponsored outbreak actually began several years prior, which the WHO
blamed on the live virus in their vaccines that had somehow “mutated”. So once again,
the WHO is causing polio in the undeveloped world, amid evidence that for every
case of identified polio there are hundreds of other children who don’t develop
the disease but remain carriers and pass it on to others. It has long been recognised
that the live oral vaccine used by the WHO can easily cause the very epidemics it pretends
to be eliminating. Of course there is no published evidence that the polio virus had in fact
“mutated”. The same occurred in Kenya, this time using the hCG hormone tied to
polio vaccinations, with the same tragic results but with the added benefit of
permanently sterilising the survivors. [17]

131
 Syrian health workers administer polio vaccination to a girl at a school in Damascus, in this file
photo taken by Syria’s national news agency SANA on October 20, 2013.
(REUTERS/SANA/Handout). Source

In late 2013, Syria experienced a sudden outbreak of polio, the first in that country
in about 20 years, and in an area that had been under the control of US-backed
revolutionary mercenaries. The Syrian government claimed to have evidence that these
foreigners brought the disease into the country from Pakistan, from Western (US)
agencies.

The WHO was active in Pakistan in yet another of its “humanitarian vaccination
programs” that strangely coincided in geographic area with a severe outbreak of
polio, and Syrian authorities were adamant that the West transmitted it to their nation
when 1.7 million doses of polio vaccine were purchased by UNICEF, in spite of the fact that
no cases of polio had been seen since 1999. After the mass vaccination program
started, cases of polio began to reappear in Syria.

132
It all began when French pharmaceutical firm Sanofi Pasteur released a statement in November 2017
that its new dengue vaccine, Denvaxia, posed a risk of more severe dengue for people who have not
been previously infected by the virus. It led to a congressional investigation into the deaths of 600
children who had received the vaccine and a dramatic drop in public confidence about all vaccines,
including measles and polio. Source

UNICEF began a similar mass vaccination program with 500,000 doses of live oral
polio vaccine in the Philippines in spite of the fact there were no reported cases
of polio in the Philippines since 1993. This would fit the pattern from other instances
of sudden disease emergencies. I have not managed yet to reconstruct the WHO’s
vaccination and other programs in all locations, but sudden outbreaks of viruses are
always suspicious since they cannot be created from nothing and must be
introduced into a population, and with surprising regularity appear on the heels
of some WHO vaccination program.

The sudden and inexplicable appearance of the Bubonic plague in Peru and
Madagascar are two such events and, increasingly often, the pathogens do not appear to
be natural in origin. In particular, the SARS-related camel virus in the Middle East had
some obvious signs of human engineering as did the SARS coronavirus itself. There are
many other such cases which are far too often linked with the presence of some program
of the WHO.

In the cases I have identified, it is uncanny that the outbreaks of all these new
diseases appear to follow immediately upon yet another WHO vaccination
campaign, and inevitably in the precise geographical locations of the WHO
activities.

133
5.3. And Meningitis . . .

In 1996 Pfizer developed a new antibiotic called Trovan to treat a variety of

infections – meningitis being one example. Many of these new antibiotics are very
powerful and with side effects that normally make them too dangerous to use for
children, often causing permanent liver damage, joint disease and many other debilitating
complications. Inexplicably, Pfizer decided to perform test trials on infants.

However, Pfizer had the standard problem that FDA certification in the US required clinical
trials on humans, and these are almost impossible to conduct in developed
countries because no parents are willing to allow their children to take part in
such risky clinical trials, to say nothing of the lawsuits resulting from trials gone bad.
Therefore, these pharma companies tend almost universally to take their trials to
poor countries in Africa, Asia and South America where the laws are unprepared
and the people don’t understand the risks of untested and unapproved drugs. The
American (and European) pharma companies therefore transformed the
developing world into an enormous test laboratory that carries no financial
liability.

As luck would have it, at precisely the moment when Pfizer was ready to commence
clinical trials of this new drug, Nigeria was suddenly and inexplicably hit with one
of the worst meningitis epidemics in history. And of course, Pfizer was there to
conduct a reprehensible clinical trial for its new medication, on a group of victims unlikely
to complain. Pfizer gathered a trial group and a control group, giving one group Pfizer’s
new medication and a competitor’s product to the other. After experimenting on about 200
victims, they gathered their test information and left.

134
 Anas Mustapha, one of the children given the experimental drug Trovan, pictured in 2007.
Photograph: George Osodi/AP. Source

That would have been the end, except that a controversy erupted soon after about the
relationship between Pfizer’s need for test trials and the meningitis outbreak. As it
happened, the WHO was in Nigeria immediately prior to that time on another of its
“life-saving” vaccination programs, this time for polio, and the timing and
location of the meningitis outbreak apparently matched perfectly the WHO’s polio
vaccination program. And of course, it perfectly matched Pfizer’s need for large
numbers of test subjects. There were lawsuits and payments, accusations and
denials, but to this day Nigeria refuses WHO entry into the country and will not
participate in any further “humanitarian” aid from the UN or the WHO.

We cannot definitively say that the WHO deliberately created the meningitis
epidemic for the benefit of Pfizer’s tests, but it’s the only theory that fits all the
known facts and it’s the kind of thing the WHO appears to do on a regular basis.

The NCBI revealed a “secret report” showing that Pfizer was at fault in the Nigerian drug
tests. [18] A website on the History of Vaccines reported on the Origins of Vaccine
Hesitancy, attributing this to Pfizer’s abominable experiment. [19] The UK
Guardian [20] and Science Magazine [21] reported on the lawsuits by Nigerian
families, and the Washington Post reported on permanent fears in the country
about any vaccine rollouts. [22]

135
5.4. And EBOLA . . .

There were reports of the Ebola virus emerging simultaneously in several African
countries in the middle of 2014. It was surprising to learn that the variety of Ebola that
appeared was “an especially powerful mutated strain that had no apparent natural
origin and immediately raised questions in many minds of having been engineered.”

This caught my attention because the circumstances seemed so familiar – (a) a

sudden, inexplicable outbreak of a new, unusual, and deadly disease, (b) in
dispersed but focused locations, (c) with nobody searching for the origin, (d)
claims that the virus was primarily race-specific, affecting primarily Africans, and
(e) the WHO once again in full attendance. Several physicians wrote an article
titled, “There is no natural disease called Ebola”, and the Wall Street Journal ran
an interesting article titled, “Scientists Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle
Virus”. [23]

I managed to locate some records of the WHO’s vaccination programs for the
countries in Africa where this Ebola virus erupted, and was not surprised to learn
of the correlation with WHO inoculations since there has been a good correlation
with other similar incidents to date. [24]

136
 Dr Cyril E. Broderick points an accusing finger at the United States for the outbreak of Ebola. The
sprawling haemorrhagic virus has killed close to 3,000 and infected close to 6,000 in West Africa
since March this year. The countries seriously affected are Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea, Nigeria, DR
Congo and Senegal. He says Ebola, a genetically modified organism (GMO), is a biological weapon of
mass destruction, just like AIDS. Source

Dr. Cyril Broderick, a former Liberian professor of plant pathology on tenure at

Delaware University in the US, wrote an article claiming that the Ebola virus
raging in western Africa was a GMO, made in a lab by western pharmaceutical
companies and administered to unsuspecting civilians through UN vaccination
programs. Of course, the Washington Post called it a “wild conspiracy theory”, but there
was a basis to his claims. Organizations implicated were the WHO, Médecins sans
frontiers, UNICEF, the US CDC and NIH, and USAMRIID. Links to the L’Oréal group,
owned by The Rothschilds, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation were also
implicated. [25] According to Dr. Broderick, Fort Detrick was known as “the EBOLA
building” over thirty years ago, and went so far as to claim there is sufficient
evidence and clearly “the need to pursue criminal and civil redress for damages”,
against the US government, Tulane University, the WHO, and at least one pharma
company.

137
Dr. Broderick’s claims are solidly backed up by Yoichi Shimatsu, a Thailand-based science
writer who pointed out that the Ebola outbreak coincided exactly with UN vaccination
programs in West Africa, and he named some very high-profile players. He said the
reason for suspecting a vaccine campaign rather than an individual carrier is due to the
fact that the EBOLA contagion did not start at a single geographic center and then spread
outward along the roads. Instead, simultaneous outbreaks of multiple cases occurred in
widely separated parts of rural Guinea. Shimatsu noted what he calls “the strange
coincidence of the earliest breakout in Guinea with major vaccine campaigns
conducted by the WHO and UNICEF. [These involved] a cholera oral vaccine effort by
Médecins Sans Frontières under the WHO, and UNICEF-funded prevention programs
against meningitis and polio.” Shimatsu wrote, “How one of the deadliest viral strains
in human history could have jumped a distance of 4,000 kilometers undetected
from Central to West Africa defies logic”, and I would certainly have to agree with his
assessment. [26] [27] I covered the EBOLA outbreak in some detail here. [28]

Anthony Lake was National Security Advisor to President Bill Clinton responsible for US military
interventions, including: the Bosnia-Herzegovina war against the Yugoslav federation; the Battle of
Mogadishu in Somalia better known as “Blackhawk Down”; and Operation Uphold Democracy in
Haiti. An ardent Zionist converted to Judaism, he is the perfect boss to dispense risky vaccines in
Muslim-majority Guinea. Source

138
The items above are by no means the only circumstances where the WHO has
conducted a vaccination campaign that was immediately followed by a pathogen
outbreak. The participants appear many: inevitably, there is a Rothschild-owned
pharma or vaccine company, and Bill Gates and his Foundation. The WHO is
always in attendance, as are (usually) UNICEF, the UNFPA, the UNDP, the World
Bank, the ubiquitous Rockefeller Foundation, the US NIH and often the CDC as
well, the Doctors Without Borders, and a few others. The Government of
Norway was also a partner in the WHO’s sterilisation travesty, contributing more than
$40 million to develop the Tetanus-abortion vaccine.

5.5. A Chinese “Experiment”?

Dr Bernhard Schwartländer. Source

The WHO is also becoming active in China with alarming potential for disaster. As one
example, in late 2013, a number of newborn Chinese babies died immediately after
being inoculated by the WHO against hepatitis B. The WHO China representative, Dr.
Bernhard Schwartlander, called China’s program “very successful”, but I find myself
with knawing suspicions about his definition of ‘success’. The infant deaths may indeed
have been an unfortunate accident, but I was not encouraged by Schwartlander’s
comment that it is “difficult to establish a causal link between the vaccines and
the babies’ deaths”. Knowing the past history of the WHO and their infectious
inoculations, the ‘difficulty of establishing a causal link between the WHO
vaccinations and civilian deaths’, may have been the part that was ‘successful’.

139
5.6. Back to Depopulation

In 2016, doctors in Kenya accused the WHO and Bill Gates of secretly trying to sterilise millions
of women in Africa via a tetanus vaccine program. Source

Specifically on the sterilisation vaccine, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has been
heavily funding the distribution of tetanus birth-control vaccine in Africa by
UNICEF, which is the agency that provided Kenya with the vaccine laced with
hCG. Gates said: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to
about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care,
reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps ten or fifteen
percent.”

The only way to interpret those words is through the anti-fertility

vaccinations. And yes, Bill Gates really did say that, although there must be 25 or 30
websites now “fact-checking” this and claiming he was either taken out of context or that
the videos have been “doctored or manipulated”. But I have seen the original video,
and yes Bill Gates did say precisely that. The Rockefeller Foundation also heavily
funded this vaccine research and distribution. [29] All this amounts to genocide
on a planetary scale.

140
5.7. A Successful Genocide

Men in name only: New study shows testosterone levels in American males are dropping
dramatically. Why would that be? Source

In April of 2023, the WHO released a comprehensive study which stated that around one
in six people worldwide are unable to conceive, around 18% of the global
population. [30] A landmark study found that male sperm counts have fallen by
62% in the last 50 years, from 104 to 49 million per milliliter, more or less at the
threshold of complete infertility.

Given all of this effort worldwide, and the plethora of contaminated vaccines produced in
the US (including one that contaminated around 100 million Americans with a
cancerous simian virus), it is hardly a surprise that the WHO published a report that
“reveals staggering infertility statistics”.

The Atlantic Magazine followed with an article titled “Sperm Counts Continue to
Fall“, [31] and one by Science Direct [32] and an op-ed by RT titled “Men in name
only“. [33]

141
5.8. And Yet More . . .

There are many other strange things about the WHO. Yoichi Shimatsu pointed out that “the
WHO sponsors the secretive International Vaccine Institute (IVI) in Seoul, which is
headed by a US military officer named Jerome Kim who was formerly the head of the
Molecular Virology and Pathogenesis Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute of
Research in Rockville, Maryland, and that sitting on the Board of Directors of this WHO-IVI
chimera is a Dr. Claudio Lanata, the science director of the US Naval “Medical Research
Unit 6” (NAMRU-6) in Callao, Peru, which is a leading military center for bioweapons
research.” If you are at all familiar with the MERS outbreak in South Korea,
Shimatsu theorised that it may have been caused by a laboratory accident at the
JUPITR biowarfare project which, given the odd behavior of the WHO, is quite
likely. [34] [35]

142
 New facts about the World Health Organisation that have destroyed trust. Source

Oddly, the WHO appeared quite unconcerned about this new potential epidemic, specifically
stating it did not recommend the screening of passengers to or from Korea, and that no
travel restrictions should be imposed. The WHO’s Director-General, Margaret Chan, said
she believed South Korea could control the spread of the disease without these
restrictions. One would have thought that with the worldwide panic still fresh in
everyone’s mind from the SARS experience only a few years prior, they would
have taken a more cautious approach. But then the WHO wasn’t entirely cautious
during the SARS outbreak either; in Hong Kong, Margaret Chan specifically advised
against taking many precautions, including screenings, isolations and
quarantines, all advice that was later much resented because those precautions
would have spared many lives. In fact, it was Margaret Chan’s curious combination of
aloofness and what appeared to be outright incompetence and dishonesty that resulted in
two politicians resigning and Chan leaving Hong Kong in disgrace, only to come to
rest as head of the WHO.

But then only three days after a report stating no precautions should be taken, a
team of WHO “experts” surprisingly stated that “The deadly MERS outbreak in
South Korea” was “large and complex”, and that “more cases should be
anticipated”. And in fact the disease had been spreading at an increasingly rapid pace,
with 150 confirmed infections in less than one month. At the time, it really seemed that
the MERS outbreak did occur from an escape at the US biological weapons lab but
that the WHO assumed the immediate quarantine of the military base would
corral it, and thus their assurance that no restrictions were necessary. But then,
it leaked, and hence the later “deadly MERS outbreak” warning that urged
multiple restrictions of all kinds.

143
It was similar with SARS, where Margaret Chan and the WHO took a very strange stance,
as if they expected the virus to just disappear. I would remind you that SARS, although
apparently intended for the Han Chinese in the mainland – and SARS was
definitely a Chinese-specific virus, infecting almost no one else, it ended by being
a Hong Kong epidemic. The virus was released on the Mainland in Guangzhou, but the
patient zero, unwittingly but immediately, traveled to Hong Kong, sparing the Mainland but
giving Hong Kong an experience to remember. [36] Still, Margaret Chan behaved as if
SARS would quickly die in HK but continue to ravage the Mainland. I see no other way
to interpret her strange behavior, which would indicate the WHO knew a lot more
about SARS than they were telling us.

There was something else very strange, from the outbreak of swine flu in the US – the
epidemic that wasn’t. For that event, the WHO changed its definition of a
“pandemic” as soon as the first cases were reported, greatly alarming the scientific
community. Prior to this, a pandemic was an event that would be expected to have “severe”
consequences on a population, but now it encompassed a pathogen with “relatively mild
symptoms”, and the WHO also lowered the threshold for the declaration of a
pandemic. Whatever the intention, the primary result was a financial windfall for
the pharmaceutical industry, since vaccines would be mandatory. In the event,
billions were spent on a largely-useless vaccine for a non-existent pandemic, and which
vaccines appeared to kill as many victims as did the virus itself. It wasn’t a secret at the
time, that the membership list of the WHO’s 16-member “Emergency Committee”,
instrumental in changing the definitions and then declaring the pandemic,
remained secret – a lack of transparency strongly attacked by almost everyone. Since
then, the information available indicates that the majority of these members have
a vested interest in the pharmaceutical industry.

5.9. Epilogue

As shocking as the accusation might seem, there appears to be no shortage of claims (and
evidence) from multiple informed and independent sources that the WHO has two
primary functions, the first as a tool for world population reduction on behalf of
its masters in The City of London, and the second as a powerful marketing agent
for big pharma, specifically the vaccine manufacturers (owned by the same
people). Many critics have pointed out that the ‘vaccination experts’ at the WHO
are “dominated by the vaccine makers standing to gain from the enormously
lucrative vaccine and antiviral contracts awarded by governments.” And indeed,
the advisory and other committees involved with the WHO’s vaccine programs seem heavily
populated with those who profit directly from those same programs.

Equally, the claims and concerns about population control and reduction are far
from conspiracy theories today, with far too much evidence, some of it
frightening, that this is indeed a major agenda of the WHO today. We have already
seen too much hard evidence of this body’s involvement in both areas to justify dismissing
the concerns as implausible fears. Moreover, there is a disturbing list of individuals
144
closely associated with the WHO, who have had either population reduction or
mass vaccinations as a pet project.

It is difficult, on the basis of all the evidence, to avoid the conclusion that the
WHO is an international criminal enterprise under the control of a core group of
European Khazars in The City of London at its center which, as one writer
noted, “provides the strategic leadership and funds the development,
manufacturing and release of synthetic, man-made viruses solely to justify
immensely profitable mass vaccinations”. We have seen so many instances of an
unusual and apparently laboratory-made virus appearing without warning, the onset
followed immediately by urgent worried pronouncements from the WHO of yet another
mandatory mass vaccination.

We have the rampant production of viruses in secretive labs around the world, and the
repeated “accidental” release of those into various populations (think ZIKA) – seemingly
inevitably without explanation, apology, or even a semblance of actual investigation, much
less censure or criminal or civil charges. We also have the blanket legal immunity for all
pharma companies in their creation and dissemination of deadly pathogens by
vaccination. When we add into this mix the WHO’s history of criminality as with
their now-famous tetanus/hCG international sterility program (the subject of this
145
essay), the curious timing of the onset of AIDS, the release of SARS, MERS, and
EBOLA, and the many occurrences of the WHO’s vaccination programs perfectly
coinciding with a sudden outbreak of yet another unusual disease in the same
areas and populations, one would have to be a hard-core ideologue to not become
damned suspicious.

And finally, we have a Croatian MP who says that the WHO Should Be Declared a
Terrorist Organization: “Worse Than the WEF”. [37] His comments: “I would like to
briefly make the people aware of the upcoming danger for humanity,” said Kolakusic. “The
World Health Organization wants all countries to sign an agreement on handing over the
authority to declare a pandemic, procure vaccines, and drugs. It will be healthier and safer
for humanity to sign an agreement with the Colombian drug cartel. They know all about
drugs for sure.”

There is much more to this story. You may care to read a companion piece titled, “The
Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth”, to learn the origin and vast reach of this
enterprise. [38]

146
NOTES

[1] Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug. International / developing countries
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/

[2] HCG found in WHO tetanus vaccine in Kenya

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/hcg-found-in-who-tetanus-vaccine-in-kenya/

[3] Vaccines and Population Control: A Hidden Agenda

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/are-new-vaccines-laced-with-birth-control-drugs/

[4] Canada’s Tainted Blood

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5973/

[5] The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research
activities
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1874951/

[6] Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: beta-
subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/7418885

[7] PHASE I CLINICAL TRIAL OF A WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION BIRTH CONTROL

VACCINE
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(88)92117-4/fulltext

[8] A vaccine that prevents pregnancy in women

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC44640/

[9] PHASE I CLINICAL TRIAL OF A WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION BIRTH CONTROL

VACCINE
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(88)92117-4/fulltext

[10] Anti-hCG vaccines are in clinical trials

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1514026/

[11] Anti-hCG vaccines are in clinical trials

https://europepmc.org/article/MED/1514026
The available data suggest that the vaccine prevents pregnancy above antibody titres of 50 ng/ml hCG

147
bioneutralization capacity. completed Phase I clinical trials, indicating the reversibility and safety of
these vaccines.

[12] Advances in development of a contraceptive vaccine against human chorionic gonadotropin

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26160491/

[13] Clin. exp. Immunol. [1978] 33, (360-375); February 8, 1978

[14] Vatican: UNICEF and WHO are sterilizing girls through vaccines
https://vaccinefactcheck.ca/2015/03/20/vatican-unicef-and-who-are-sterilizing-girls-through-
vaccines/

[15] Fertility-Regulating Vaccines are Being Tested in India;

https://vactruth.com/2018/05/30/fertility-regulating-vaccines-india/

[16] Fertility-Regulating Vaccines are Being Tested in India;

https://vactruth.com/2018/05/30/fertility-regulating-vaccines-india/

[17] More polio cases now caused by vaccine than by wild virus
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/polio-cases-now-caused-vaccine-wild-virus-67287290

[18] Secret report surfaces showing that Pfizer was at fault in Nigerian drug tests
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1471980/

[19] Origins of Vaccine Hesitancy: The 1996 Pfizer Drug Trials in Nigeria
https://historyofvaccines.org/blog/origins-vaccine-hesitancy-1996-pfizer-drug-trials-nigeria

[20] Pfizer pays out to Nigerian families of meningitis drug trial victims
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/aug/11/pfizer-nigeria-meningitis-drug-compensation

[21] Nigerian Families Sue Pfizer

https://www.science.org/content/article/nigerian-families-sue-pfizer

[22] In this Nigerian city, Pfizer fears loom over the vaccine rollout
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/03/20/nigeria-pfizer-kano-coronavirus-trovan/

[23] Scientists Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle Virus

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10559743167269800

[24] The Ebola Breakout Coincided With UN Vaccine Campaigns

https://rense.com/general96/ebobreakout.html

[25] Ebola Made by Pharma & DOD, Injected by UN – Dr. Broderick

https://eclinik.net/ebola-made-in-the-usa-by-big-pharma-dept-of-defense/

[26] The Ebola Breakout Coincided With UN Vaccine Campaigns

https://www.21cir.com/the-ebola-breakout-coincided-with-un-vaccine-campaigns/

[27] Rebirth of Empire & The American Role: The Global Biowarfare and Ebola Serum
https://www.21cir.com/rebirth-of-empire-the-american-role-the-biowar-ebola-serum/

[28] EBOLA
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/1087/

[29] Rockefeller-Funded Anti-Fertility Vaccine Coordinated by WHO

https://www.globalresearch.ca/rockefeller-funded-anti-fertility-vaccine-coordinated-by-who

[30] WHO reveals ‘staggering’ infertility statistics

https://www.rt.com/news/574235-who-infertility-rate-study/
148
[31] Sperm Counts Continue to Fall
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/10/sperm-counts-continue-to-fall/572794/

[32] A study from Jauary 2020: Trends in Serum Testosterone Levels Among Adolescent and Young
Adult Men in the US
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1743609519315292

[33] Men in name only: New study shows testosterone levels in American males are dropping
dramatically. Why would that be?
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/478234-testosterone-crisis-america-future/

[34] South Korea MERS Emerged Out Of The Pentagon’s Biowarfare Labs
https://rense.com/general96/merspenta.html

[35] MERS
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/mers-november-18-2020/

[36] SARS
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/860/

[37] Croatian MP Says the WHO Should Be Declared a Terrorist Organization: ‘Worse Than the WEF’
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/croatian-mp-says-the-who-should-be-declared-a-terrorist-organization-
worse-than-the-wef/

[38] The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5760/

149
By Larry Romanoff

Manhattan, New York USA – July 9, 2011: Pfizer letter sign on the building’s Headquarters. Pfizer’s
is the largest pharmaceutical company in the world.Source

The WHO, Pfizer, and Nigerian Meningitis

Source
150
It is by now well-known that many new drugs are accompanied by serious side-effects such
as irreversible liver damage, and are often fatal to children. In 1996 Pfizer developed a
new antibiotic called Trovan to treat a variety of infections – meningitis being one
example. Many of these new antibiotics are very powerful and with side effects that
normally make them too dangerous to use for children, often causing permanent liver
damage, joint disease and many other debilitating complications. Inexplicably, Pfizer
decided to perform test trials on infants. However, Pfizer had the standard problem that
FDA certification in the US required clinical trials on humans, and these are almost
impossible to conduct in developed countries because no parents are willing to allow their
children to take part in such risky clinical trials, to say nothing of the lawsuits resulting
from trials gone bad. Therefore, these pharma companies tend almost universally
to take their trials to poor countries in Africa, Asia and South America where the
laws are unprepared and the people don’t understand the risks of untested and
unapproved drugs. The American (and European) pharma companies therefore
transformed the developing world into an enormous test laboratory that carries
no financial liability.

A doctor vaccinates a child against meningitis in Dakwa village, Bwari, Nigeria. Source

As luck would have it, at precisely the moment when Pfizer was ready to commence clinical
trials of this new drug, Nigeria was suddenly and inexplicably hit with one of the worst
meningitis epidemics in history. And of course, Pfizer was there to help the Nigerian
government deal with the outbreak. But Pfizer didn’t exactly deal with the outbreak; what
it did was to conduct a reprehensible clinical trial for its new medication, on a group of
victims unlikely to complain. Rather than “helping” as it claimed, Pfizer gathered a trial
group and a control group, giving one group Pfizer’s new medication and a competitor’s
product to the other. It quickly became obvious that the Americans were not on a

151
humanitarian mission but were saving the expense of live trials. After
experimenting on about 200 victims, they gathered their test information and left
– right in the middle of the meningitis epidemic, without having saved any lives.
The Nigerian government tallied the deaths at about 11,000.

The Infectious Diseases Hospital in Kano, Nigeria, was treating meningitis patients in 1996 when
Pfizer administered the experimental drug Trovan to children. (2000 Photos By Michael Williamson
— The Washington Post) Source

That would have been the end, except that a controversy erupted soon after about the
relationship between Pfizer’s need for test trials and the meningitis outbreak. As it
happened, the WHO was in Nigeria immediately prior to that time on another of its
“life-saving” vaccination programs, this time for polio, and the timing and
location of the meningitis outbreak apparently matched perfectly the WHO’s polio
vaccination program. And of course, it perfectly matched Pfizer’s need for large
numbers of test subjects. There were lawsuits and payments, accusations and
denials, but to this day Nigeria refuses WHO entry into the country and will not
participate in any further “humanitarian” aid from the UN or the WHO.

We cannot definitively say that the WHO deliberately created the meningitis
epidemic for the benefit of Pfizer’s tests, but it’s the only theory that fits all the
known facts and it’s the kind of thing the WHO appears to do on a regular
basis. We should note Pfizer’s intention to market Trovan in the US and Europe after its

152
trials on these African children, but the FDA refused to approve Trovan for American
children due to the severe dangers.

Source

Pfizer’s behavior after these “field trials” ended was, if anything, even more reprehensible.
The lawsuits were based on claims that Pfizer did not have proper consent from parents to
use an experimental drug on their children, the use of which not only left many children
dead but others with brain damage or paralysis. Pfizer eventually reached a settlement
with the Nigerian state government to pay $75m in damages and to create a fund of $35m
to compensate the victims. This, after what the Guardian described as “a 15-year legal
battle against Pfizer over a fiercely controversial drug trial”. Pfizer not only resisted to the
end, forcing the poor families through 15 years of hell before finally relenting, but resorted
to extortion and blackmail of Nigerian government officials in attempts to avoid making
any payments to the families of the tiny victims of its illegal drug trial. The UK Guardian
reported that leaked US government diplomatic cables revealed that “Pfizer hired
investigators to look for evidence of corruption against the Nigerian attorney
general in an effort to persuade him to drop the legal action”, with the apparent
full knowledge and assistance of the US State Department.

The Guardian stated the diplomatic cables recorded meetings between Pfizer’s country
manager, Enrico Liggeri, and US officials at the Abuja embassy on 9 April 2009, stating,
“According to Liggeri, Pfizer had hired investigators to uncover corruption links to federal
attorney general Michael Aondoakaa to expose him and put pressure on him to drop the
federal cases. He said Pfizer’s investigators were passing this information to local
153
media.” The Guardian also reported there was no suggestion or evidence Nigeria’s attorney
general was swayed by this pressure. Pfizer of course claimed the entire notion was
“preposterous”, but we can assume the cables – which were classified as
“Confidential” – didn’t lie.

It seems Pfizer was dissembling in all its statements, not only with claims of
government approval and parental knowledge, but their claim a Nigerian doctor was in
charge and directed the experiments. The government’s study found the local doctor was
the director “in name only” and most often was not even informed of the procedures of the
study and was typically “kept in the dark”. As well Pfizer used the fake letter from a
non-existent department to obtain FDA approval for these clinical trials. Pfizer
finally admitted the forged letter was “incorrect”, but I’m not sure that is the most
appropriate adjective to use. Pfizer also made the infuriatingly dishonest claim that its
antibiotic “Trovan demonstrated the highest survival rate of any treatment at the hospital.
Trovan unquestionably saved lives.” Well, maybe, but the data on which Pfizer based
this claim were the fact that in one location five patients died after using Pfizer’s
drug while six patients died after using another medication, with no data as to
infection severity or anything else. At best, an empty and fundamentally
dishonest claim.

To deflect the issue of Pfizer’s Trovan being lethal to children, the company claimed that
the international body Doctors Without Borders (Médecins sans Frontières) were
administering Pfizer’s drug in their own large treatment program, a claim MSF vehemently
denied, saying, “We have never worked with this family of antibiotic. We don’t use it for
meningitis. That is the reason why we were shocked to see this trial in the hospital.” It
was Pfizer’s Liggeri who claimed the lawsuits against Pfizer “were wholly political
in nature”, and Liggeri as well who concocted the accusation that MSF had
administered Pfizer’s Trovan to children.

In 2006 the Washington Post reported on a lengthy Nigerian government study that
concluded Pfizer violated international law by testing its unapproved drug on children with
brain infections. The Post apparently obtained a copy of the confidential report which had
been hidden away for five years, and which stated Pfizer had never received
authorisation from the government for its clinical trial, the apparent authorisation
letter having been forged on the letterhead of a non-existent department and
backdated to a date prior to the study. According to the Post’s article, the government
claimed Pfizer’s ‘humanitarian effort’ was “an illegal trial of an unregistered drug, and
a clear case of exploitation of the ignorant.” [1] [2]

The American response was not one of shame for participating in this fraud, nor did the
State Department condemn Pfizer for either conducting the drug trials or attempting the
extortion and blackmail. Instead, the US ambassador condemned the leak of US
embassy cables, as if publicly revealing a crime constituted a worse action than
the crime itself. The State Department rushed the high moral ground to condemn
“endangering innocent people” and “sabotaging peaceful relations between nations”,
ignoring the facts that Pfizer’s trials did far more to ‘endanger innocent people’ and

154
‘sabotage relations’ than could be done by the revelation of a crime. But in the eyes of
the US government, Americans do not commit crimes, and in any case the victims
weren’t white. The cables further claimed Pfizer settled only because legal and
‘investigative’ fees had been costing the company more than $15 million per year,
which leads one to wonder what occurs in the minds of these people who will
spend $15 million a year for 15 years, to avoid paying half that sum to compensate
lives they destroyed.

Source

And there is still more. We have seen so many documented examples of the US courts
assuming jurisdiction where they have none, agreeing to try cases without any US
involvement that occurred wholly outside the US, in flagrant violations of international law,
and indicative only of imperial arrogance. But when Nigeria attempted to file claims
against Pfizer in the US, the American courts refused to hear the cases, oddly
claiming they had no jurisdiction. And this isn’t the first time the US government,
the State Department and the US courts have circled the wagons to protect a US
multinational by closing the courts. [3] [4] [5]

In 2004 and 2007, the Nigerian media carried reports which were heavily
suppressed in US and Western media that the country was refusing to permit UN
health authorities to carry out further administration of polio vaccines. The
government adamantly blamed the WHO for having initiated the meningitis
epidemic with their polio vaccination campaign, which occurred immediately prior
to, and in the same areas as, the meningitis outbreak. Nigerian leaders were also
concerned that polio and other foreign vaccines were deliberately contaminated

155
with sterilising and other agents, as occurred in the Philippines and other nations
at around the same time. In much of Africa, there appears to be little remaining
of the trust that once existed in international agencies and US and European
pharma companies. Today, they are viewed primarily as imperial predators with
a distinctly anti-human agenda, or at least an agenda that is anti non-white. The
portions of Nigeria and other African nations that do still permit vaccinations now insist
these be prepared in a trusted non-Western country with no involvement of the WHO or
other Western agencies.

Source

Many nations today insist the WHO is a tool to reduce Muslim populations, a claim
that is increasingly difficult to dismiss as simple paranoia, and in fact Nigeria also
discovered sterilants in WHO vaccines in that country that were clearly capable
of preventing fertility in women. The Western media steadfastly ignore the body of
evidence supporting these claims and suspicions, and focus instead on a moralistic concern
that “the world might be slipping in its efforts to wipe out polio”, categorising the valid
concerns of so many nations as ignorant and uninformed suspicion. The Western
media of course are all reading from the same page as the perpetrators of this outrage, and
the more damning reports have all seemingly been removed from the Internet.

We also have the ever-present corporate apologists, weaving their tapestries of

misinformation attempting to irreversibly confuse an issue with irrelevancies and so as to
156
place doubts in the minds of the public. One perennial favorite is a claim that “these
attacks on pharmaceutical companies could encourage countries to enact
legislation that would lower drug profits, which in turn could hamper the development
of new medications”. This foolish statement from Roger Bate, a “fellow” at the
International Policy Network, which is a lobby group for big pharma, funded by
the usual Foundations and corporations, and dutifully reported by London’s Daily
Telegraph in its campaign to confuse the uninformed public. The statement is actually
rather clever, suggesting that our condemnation of the atrocities and illegalities of big
pharma are somehow unjustified violent “attacks” on undeserving corporations.

Hajara, photographed in 2007, survived the trials but became deaf afterwards and is unable to
speak. Source

In the case of Pfizer and its Nigerian Trovan trials, The Telegraph gives us an added
incentive to sympathise with big pharma by telling us – without evidence or
documentation – that “the Nigerian government’s motives (in condemning Pfizer)
have also been questioned”, the issue being morphed from reprehensible drug
trials resulting in death of children into one of an untrustworthy government with
questionable political motives. Thus will the Western media will spin and weave
until truth in all its forms disappears from the landscape forever.

157
NOTES

[1] Panel Faults Pfizer in ’96 Clinical Trial In Nigeria

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/06/AR2006050601338.html

[2] Secret report surfaces showing that Pfizer was at fault in Nigerian drug tests

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1471980/

[3] Nigerian Families Sue Pfizer

https://www.science.org/content/article/nigerian-families-sue-pfizer

[4] Pfizer pays out to Nigerian families of meningitis drug trial victims

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/aug/11/pfizer-nigeria-meningitis-drug-compensation

[5] Pfizer: Nigeria drug trial victims get compensation

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-14493277

158
Content

7.1. The Official Story – Pathogen Spread by Wild Birds

7.2. Then: The Disclaimers

7.3. All We Need to do is Think

7.4. Epilogue

If consumers knew how farmed chickens were raised, they might never eat their meat again. Source

In 2015, the US experienced an outbreak of bird flu viruses that affected domestic
poultry, and more than 50 million birds died or were euthanised to prevent the
spread of the virus. This was the first time that domestic poultry in the US had
been infected with these particular strains of bird flu – H5N2 and
H5N8. [1] [2] The virus first emerged in Minnesota, appearing almost exclusively in
commercial turkey farms, and infecting several dozen locations almost simultaneously,
but eventually including millions of turkeys and chickens in smaller establishments. [3] It
then spread to about 25 other states, the NPR at the time claiming the outbreak was
being driven by “farm-to-farm transmission” [4] though others blamed the
outbreak on wild birds.

159
Another strain of avian flu, A(H5N1), emerged in the US in early 2022 and affected
tens of millions of commercial poultry and backyard flocks. This was the worst
avian-flu outbreak in US history. [5] [6] Flocks in 42 states were infected by the 2022
outbreak, twice as many as in 2015. Nearly 55 million birds were killed in this outbreak,
some dying from the disease itself, but the vast majority being killed to stop the virus
from spreading. This strain of the avian flu has spread nearly worldwide, limited
outbreaks being reported in North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa. [7] The
USDA said turkey farms accounted for more than 70% of the commercial poultry
farms infected in the outbreak. [8]

7.1. The Official Story – Pathogen Spread by Wild Birds

Migratory birds

Wikipedia claimed that “Migratory waterfowl are assumed to have brought the
disease to the Midwest”. [9] The IBI Times gave a long dissertation on how “mass
migration” of wild waterfowl over the central states in the US had “caused
significant problems for bird farmers in its path”, telling us that “migrating ducks
and geese are carrying a deadly flu and their droppings are somehow sickening
millions of turkeys and chickens being raised in commercial birdhouses for food”. [10]

Reuters doubled down on this theory, stating, “Wild birds like ducks transmit the virus
through their feces, feathers or direct contact with poultry. Wild birds continue to

160
spread [the virus] throughout the country as they migrate.” Further, that “85% of the
cases were traced directly to wild bird origins”. [11]

The NPR continued to push this theory: “Scientists believe that wild migratory birds
brought this virus to North America a few months ago. That’s because this particular
flu virus seems capable of hanging around in populations of wild birds, which can pass the
virus on to poultry farms.” [12] “Unlike the 2014-15 outbreak, this one is being driven
by wild birds, not by farm-to-farm transmission. For commercial and backyard flocks,
many early infections centered along the intersection of the Central and Mississippi flyways
of migratory wild birds. As those birds traveled, so did the virus.” [13] The WHO was also
front and center in promoting the theory that AI viruses are shed in the feces and
respiratory secretions. They can all be spread through direct contact with
secretions from infected birds, especially through feces or through contaminated feed
and water. Migratory wild birds, especially waterfowls, are the natural host and
reservoir of avian influenza viruses.

The main wild species involved in the viral cycle of avian influenza are waterfowls, gulls,
and shorebirds, Direct exposure of farmed birds to wild birds is a likely transmission route
of the virus. The WHO also blamed “Globalisation and international trade” as responsible
parties: “The WHO believes the wave of outbreaks is the result of international
trade, farming practices and migratory wild birds.” [14] According to the US CDC,
the virus “appears well-adapted to spread efficiently among wild
birds”. [15] Reuters reported one farmer who thought maybe “wind blew the virus in
from nearby fields where geese defecated”.

Another thread to this argument, necessary to lend credibility to the basic theory,
was that “[this is] a family of highly contagious viruses that are not harmful to wild
birds that transmit it, but are deadly to domesticated birds … these birds do not
typically get sick when they are infected with it, but when domesticated poultry, such as
chickens and turkeys, come in direct or indirect contact with feces of infected wild birds,
they become infected” (and die within 48 hours). [16] The WHO was here too: “…the
virus can be harmless to the wild bird … When birds have little or no symptoms of the
virus, it allows them to spread the viruses between neighboring countries or over long
distances.

Wild birds have spread the disease farther and wider around the world than ever
before, likely carrying record amounts of the virus, said Gregorio Torres, the head
of the science department at the Paris-based WHO [17] MSN told us “Direct exposure of
farmed birds to wild birds (which are permanently infected) is a likely transmission route
of the virus, according to the [WHO].” [18] Reuters particularly flogged this part of
the theory – that wild birds can be infected but show no symptoms and never
become sick, but they pass it to domestic birds who die almost
instantly: “Waterfowl like ducks can carry the disease without dying and
introduce it to poultry through contaminated feces, saliva and other means.” [19]

161
7.2. Then: The Disclaimers

Source

Beginning with Wikipedia, “Migratory waterfowl are assumed to have brought the disease
to the Midwest, but how it made its way into poultry barns is undetermined. How it
might be spreading from farms that are far away from one another is less understood at
this time. [20] The USDA apparently told TIME magazine that “Poultry operations
have a very complex variety of inputs including air, feed, people, vehicles, birds,
water and others. Any of these might be the pathway of virus introduction on any
single operation.” Researchers are still conducting studies to learn how the virus is
spreading to poultry operations. [21]

That has left government officials, farmers and researchers alike grasping for
answers as to how the flu has continued to infiltrate birdhouses. The U.S.
Department of Agriculture, which coordinates with states in responding to the outbreak and
also conducts research on bird flu, has no clear answers so far as to why the virus is
spreading. “We cannot say definitely how specific poultry operations are becoming infected
at this point. While wild birds have been blamed for carrying the virus, it’s not clear
how it has continued to spread. The fact that the majority of birds struck by the
flu have been hens and turkeys kept indoors on commercial farms and not those
in backyard flocks indicates that wild birds are no longer the primary culprit. Jim
Roth, director of the Center for Food Security and Public Health at Iowa State,
said, “Migrating waterfowl don’t get into these large commercial
operations. Something has to carry the virus in. It’s also possible that the virus
was passed through infected feed.” “There’s some recognition that maybe [there are]
other avenues of transmission,” said Dustin VandeHoef, communications director for the
Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship. “These [wild bird origins] are
all theories at this point.” [22] A Japanese farmer near Tokyo said, “Avian flu is
162
occurring even in a new poultry farm with modern equipment and no
windows“. [23]

7.3. All We Need to do is Think

There are some important things to note here, areas where the official story sounds
plausible, but on reflection proves to be either idle speculation or complete
nonsense. The migratory wild birds being discussed here are primarily ducks and
geese, and anyone who knows anything about farming will tell you that wild
ducks absolutely will not mix with domestic poultry. You can learn more by
speaking to a duck hunter than by listening to either Reuters or the CDC. The wild
birds do indeed have long flyways where they travel from Northern Canada all the
way to Mexico or Central America, but they seldom stop. Even hummingbirds and
Monarch butterflies will travel hundreds of miles on each leg of their migration journey,
and Canada geese will travel 1,500 miles non-stop.

Further, when migrating waterfowl take a break in their migration and come to land, they
will stay as far away from human habitation as possible. They do not search out
the nearest KFC or chicken ranch. Typically, they will look for a wide-open area far
from habitation, preferably a wheat field with a slough or pond so they can have
food and water and a safe place to rest. In the worst typical case, they will be (at least)
several miles away from any chicken ranch or turkey farm. We can concede that these wild
birds will leave droppings in the wheat fields, but then are we to believe the domestic

163
chickens and turkeys leave their houses or farmyards and run several miles to the
wheat fields to frolic with the wild ducks and geese, and then eat the infected
feathers or roll around in the feces and become infected? In fact, the domestic
birds never leave their normal habitation, and certainly do not go roaming into
the wheat fields where the wild birds rest.

In real life, the migratory birds rarely come to land, and there are never situations
where the two kinds of birds would come into physical contact. As the Japanese
farmer pointed out, birds were becoming infected in new farms with modern
equipment and no windows – and absolutely no contact with wild birds of any
description. And as the expert from Iowa pointed out, “Migrating waterfowl don’t get
into these large commercial operations. Something has to carry the virus
in.” Moreover, NPR’s statements of “farm-to-farm transmission” were clearly
dishonest: that might happen between two adjoining farms, but a turkey farm in Iowa
is not conducting “farm-to-farm transmission” with a chicken ranch in
Missouri. Reuters’ claim that “85% of the cases were traced directly to wild bird
origins” was an outright lie.

The best guess about the transmission vector for the virus, would be the feed,
since it is normally sourced from some part of Big Agra. We might think that this could not
affect small farms since they would typically be growing seed crops and would have their
own bird food. But things are not always what they seem. There are six Big Agra
companies that control the vast bulk of the poultry and feed in this
context: Tyson, JBS, Smithfield, Cargill, National Beef, and Hormel. You may be
surprised to learn that companies like Tyson, who sell millions of chickens every year, don’t
actually have any chickens; everything has been sub-contracted and out-sourced.
One website specialising in these matters states that “Ninety-six percent of broiler
chickens in the US are raised under production contracts [in which] growers do
not own the birds but instead raise them under contract with agribusinesses like
Tyson.” In this situation, the growers (farmers) will sign a contract with a Big Agra firm to
produce 10,000 chickens, or 50,000 chickens, and would be buying their bird food
(seed) from or through the same company.

And now you can see the advantage of being able to splice H1N1 into bird
seed. [24] I have no proof this has happened, but there are no records of farmers sending
their feed to laboratories for analysis. Why would such a thing happen? To eliminate small
farmers and put a nation’s entire food supply into the hands of a few select Big
Agra companies. Lest you think this is fantasy, let’s look at the larger picture. Salon
Magazine produced an interesting article titled, “Massive livestock operations are
taking over the country“. [25]

The US. Department of Agriculture says that meat and dairy monopolies currently exhibit
unilateral control over the market with few limitations to their expansion and power. “80%
of all beef production is controlled by only the top four suppliers. 99.9% of chickens are
raised on factory farms. Overall, two-thirds of all meat production in the United States in
corporate monopolies”. The six Big Agra companies listed above “either drive

164
competitors out of business or buy them out”. “Between the years 1970 and 2006,
America lost 88% of its dairy farms.’ [26] [27] The number of dairy cows on factory farms
doubled, and the average-sized dairy factory farm increased by half, between 1997 and
2012. The number of hogs on factory farms increased by more than one-third, and the
average farm size swelled nearly 70 percent from 1997 to 2012. The number of
broiler chickens on factory farms rose nearly 80 percent from 1997 to 2012, to
more than 1 billion. The number of egg-laying hens on factory farms increased by
nearly one quarter from 1997 to 2012, to 269 million. [28]

“Michigan provides a stark example: The number of factory dairy operations in the state
more than quadrupled between 1997 and 2017 — and the total number of cows living
on these operations increased eightfold. Yet today, Michigan has fewer than half as
many small- and medium-sized dairies than it did 20 years ago. The average factory feedlot
houses 4,000 head of cattle, but the largest ones can pack in up to 150,000 head or
more at one time. In 1980, the top four beef-packing firms slaughtered one out of three
cattle; this increased to four out of five by 1995 and remains steady to this
day.” [29] [30]

Bill Gates’ efforts are tied into investing in synthetic dairy and lab-grown meats in the name of
preventing climate change. Getty Images for The New York Times. Source

And here is a graphic display of the current situation of agricultural density in the US, most
of this in the hands of the few Big Agra companies. In this context you might think also
165
of reports of people like Bill Gates buying up hundreds of thousands of acres of
farmland in the US, reportedly now the largest owner of farmland, with about
270,000 acres across 19 states. [31]

The Consequences of Over-Crowding our Country with Factory Farms

Back to the bird flu: it seems apparent that the media flood about wild migratory birds
being the cause, was just propaganda, idle speculation that appeared superficially plausible
but that had no actual evidence to support it, and in fact many contraindications denying
it. The question then is why the media, especially Reuters who are becoming famous
for misinformation, and organisations like the WHO and the CDC (who also
increasingly qualify as misinformation sources) would so strongly promulgate a
theory they would have to know was fictitious. The only possible answer is that they
are in favor of the increasing monopolisation of the human food supply in a few
hands, and all are reading from the same script.

7.4. Epilogue

Once again, let’s consider the common signs used to identify a bio-warfare agent:

166
 1. Disease caused by an unusual, rare or uncommon pathogen. Certainly the
2015 outbreak would qualify, since it was the first time that domestic
poultry in the US had been infected with these particular strains of bird
flu – 5N2 and H5N8. 2022 was not better.
2. Lack of an epidemiological explanation. i.e. no clear idea of source or
origin; the wild bird cause was nonsense, and all authorities in the end
admitted to being baffled as to the origin and cause.
3. Unusual presentation or manifestation of the disease. In this case, in 2015
at least, it attacked only turkey farms initially, only later spreading to
chickens.
4. Unusual geographic or seasonal distribution; in both outbreaks, the virus
struck simultaneously (or nearly so) in many locations and many states.
No wild bird infection could manifest in such a manner
5. Multiple epidemics. Simultaneous epidemics at different locations with
the same organism, and thus highly suspect.

Millions of animals deliberately infected.

The necessary conclusion is that there had to have been a common element to
have caused so many virtually simultaneous infections with the same pathogen
in so many different areas, and the only common element I can identify would be
the food source. I would have to say that there is also rational cause for doubt and
suspicion when the “official story” is clearly nonsense, as it was in this case – and has been
in so many others. The idea that the Big Agra companies, with support from these
international institutions, would engage in such nefarious enterprises as infecting
167
animal food, at first glance may appear preposterous, but there is evidence to
support this hypothesis. In the next article in this series you will read about the
outbreaks of foot and mouth disease in the UK, where it appears almost a certainty
that huge numbers of animals throughout the UK were deliberately infected, and
then nearly 15 million killed, with much informed speculation that this had to be a
deliberate plan to benefit Big Agra. If you have doubts, I suggest you reserve your
judgment until you read this next article. The information should shock you to the
core.

168
NOTES

[1] US Bird Flu Outbreak in Poultry: Workers at Higher Risk, CDC Warn

https://news.yahoo.com/us-bird-flu-outbreak-poultry-workers-higher-risk-235518139.html

[2] 2015 United States H5N2 outbreak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_H5N2_outbreak

[3] 2015 United States H5N2 outbreak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_H5N2_outbreak

[4] What we know about the deadliest U.S. bird flu outbreak in history

https://www.npr.org/2022/12/02/1140076426/what-we-know-about-the-deadliest-u-s-bird-flu-
outbreak-in-history

[5] Bird flu is killing millions of chickens and turkeys across the US

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/04/bird-flu-is-killing-millions-of-chickens-and-turkeys-
across-the-us/

[6] Bird flu kills close to a record number of poultry in the U.S.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-nears-record-poultry-deaths-bird-flu-virus-type-complicates-
fight-2022-10-18/

[7] Bird flu: 50 million birds die in record US outbreak

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63785067

[8] Avian flu outbreak wipes out 50.54 mln U.S. birds, a record

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/avian-flu-outbreak-wipes-out-5054-
mln-us-birds-record-2022-11-24/

169
[9] 2015 United States H5N2 outbreak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_H5N2_outbreak

[10] Bird Flu Outbreak 2015: Deadly Virus’ Spread Sparks Questions On Biosecurity, Strict
Sanitation Protocols At Poultry Farms

https://www.ibtimes.com/bird-flu-outbreak-2015-deadly-virus-spread-sparks-questions-biosecurity-
strict-1910927

[11] Avian flu outbreak wipes out 50.54 mln U.S. birds, a record

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/avian-flu-outbreak-wipes-out-5054-
mln-us-birds-record-2022-11-24/

[12] A worrisome new bird flu is spreading in American birds and may be here to stay

https://www.npr.org/2022/04/09/1091491202/bird-flu-2022-avian-influenza-poultry-farms

[13] What we know about the deadliest U.S. bird flu outbreak in history

https://www.npr.org/2022/12/02/1140076426/what-we-know-about-the-deadliest-u-s-bird-flu-
outbreak-in-history

[14] Avian Influenza

https://www.woah.org/en/disease/avian-influenza/

[15] Ask the Expert: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Viruses

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/spotlights/2022-2023/avian-flu-highly-pathogenic.htm

[16] Bird flu is killing millions of chickens and turkeys across the US

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/04/bird-flu-is-killing-millions-of-chickens-and-turkeys-
across-the-us/

[17] Avian Influenza

https://www.woah.org/en/disease/avian-influenza/

[18] The Bird-Flu Outbreak Still Isn’t Over – What to Know Before the Summer

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/fitness/the-bird-flu-outbreak-still-isn-t-over-what-to-know-
before-the-summer/ar-AAVT6Ov

[19] Insight: Bird flu spreads to new countries, threatens non-stop ‘war’ on poultry

https://www.reuters.com/world/bird-flu-spreads-new-countries-threatens-non-stop-war-poultry-
2023-02-15/

[20] 2015 United States H5N2 outbreak

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_States_H5N2_outbreak

[21] Everything You Want to Know About the Bird Flu Outbreak

https://time.com/3857283/bird-flu-outbreak-usda/

170
[22] Bird Flu Outbreak 2015: Deadly Virus’ Spread Sparks Questions On Biosecurity, Strict
Sanitation Protocols At Poultry Farms

https://www.ibtimes.com/bird-flu-outbreak-2015-deadly-virus-spread-sparks-questions-biosecurity-
strict-1910927

[23] Insight: Bird flu spreads to new countries, threatens non-stop ‘war’ on poultry

https://www.reuters.com/world/bird-flu-spreads-new-countries-threatens-non-stop-war-poultry-
2023-02-15/

[24] The World of Biological Warfare — Chapter 4 – Genetically Modified Seeds (updated)

[25] America’s factory farm sh*tshow: Massive livestock operations are taking over the
country

https://www.salon.com/2015/05/29/americas_factory_farm_shtshow_massive_livestock_operation
s_are_taking_over_the_country/

[26] It’s Time That We Factor Out Factory Farming

https://www.newrootsinstitute.org/articles/its-time-that-we-factor-out-factory-farming

[27] Factory Farms Continue to Dominate U.S. Livestock Industry

https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2015/05/27/factory-farms-continue-dominate-us-
livestock-industry

[28] America’s factory farm sh*tshow: Massive livestock operations are taking over the
country

https://www.salon.com/2015/05/29/americas_factory_farm_shtshow_massive_livestock_operation
s_are_taking_over_the_country/

[29] Factory Farm Nation: 2020 Edition

https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ib_2004_updfacfarmmaps-
web2.pdf

[30] Map Reveals Massive Increase in Factory Farming

https://www.organicauthority.com/energetic-health/map-reveals-massive-increase-in-factory-
farming

[31] Bill Gates is reportedly the largest farmland owner in America

https://nypost.com/2021/01/15/bill-gates-is-the-largest-farmland-owner-in-america-report/

171
Content

8.1. UK Foot and Mouth Outbreak

8.2. Bio-Hazard Facilities

8.3. Evaluation and Conclusions

8.1. UK Foot and Mouth Disease

In 2001, an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease ravaged the British farming industry.

There are a few articles on this topic on the Internet, by the BBC and UK Guardian, but
they mostly repeat the official story in generalities and provide no useful information.
Almost all information of interest or value appears to have been expunged from the
Internet.

172
Carcasses of cows are loaded onto lorries, to be disposed of, after being slaughtered in fields by Settle
in the Yorkshire Dales, as the cull continues in a bid to halt the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in
the area. (Photo by John Giles – PA Images/PA Images via Getty Images). Source

When the outbreaks occurred exports from the UK of live animals, meat and dairy products
were banned by other nations, as was the movement of animals from the infected areas,
and the government ordered a mass slaughter of millions of animals. The losses to British
farmers were nearly incalculable, with a great many farmers going bankrupt or otherwise
put out of business, and some farmers committing suicide in anguish over their losses.
Within six months, almost 4 million animals had been slaughtered and their carcasses
burned, eventually reaching the astonishing total of around 12-14 million. Oddly, in the
face of this enormous disaster, the government refused to hold a public inquiry
into the outbreak, announcing instead three small separate investigations, the
results of which would not be made public.

“There was no discretion involved,” he said. “It was that policy and its inflexibility which led to such
large numbers of animals being slaughtered.” He said the charity argued there was insufficient
scientific evidence for the policy and some scientists said in many cases the disease did not spread
beyond a few hundred metres. Source

173
The UK government initially blamed the disease outbreak on “animal activists”, but not
everyone believed the official story. At the time, the Sunday Express reported that the
outbreak had been attributed to some vials containing foot and mouth virus, which had
gone mysteriously missing from the laboratories at Porton Down, which location is a top-
secret government biological weapons research facility housing such agents as TB, anthrax,
smallpox, Ebola – and the foot-and-mouth viruses.

The report stated that “Authorities tried to play down the report by suggesting that “animal
rights activists” had stolen and released the samples from the maximum-security
government laboratory, though the authorities failed to explain how animal rights activists
would believe they were promoting animal rights by releasing a biological agent that would
result in the destruction of millions of animals, or how they were able to penetrate the
multiple layers of defenses in the heavily-secured laboratory.

As well, one media report in 2001 stated that “An eminent scientist with thirty
years’ experience of infectious diseases challenged [UK Prime Minister] Blair in a
prominent Sunday newspaper to “come clean and tell the truth about the foot-
and-mouth epidemic”. The scientist testified that the virus strain which devastated
Britain’s livestock “was not active in any other part of the world and could only have
come from a UK laboratory.” And indeed, the UK government bio-warfare labs at both
Pirbright and Porton Down have been confirmed by the UK Minister of Health as containing
more than 5,000 different strains of this virus, and in the end, it did indeed appear the
virus had originated in the UK government’s bio-warfare labs at Porton Down.

Then, the Sunday Express reported that a routine audit of Porton Down’s bio-warfare labs
revealed that a container of several vials of foot-and-mouth virus had gone missing two
months before the first outbreak of the disease, stating that “There are very persistent
rumors over missing phials from Porton Down linked to animal rights activists”.

The government of course desperately denied such a possibility, stating that “… only the
Institute of Animal Health Laboratory and the Merial Biological Laboratory at Pirbright
are licensed to hold FMD virus”, and that tales of the virus being stolen from Porton Down
were inaccurate and impossible. But then, a senior military source at Porton Down stated
publicly that vials “appear to have gone missing from one of the labs [at Porton Down]
following a routine audit last year.”

The government then admitted that such a thing did happen after all and, right on cue, the
government blamed the usual “animal rights activists” for the theft and release of the
deadly pathogen, the media dutifully reporting that “Ministry officials were informed
immediately and an investigation was launched initially by Special Branch and then by MI5,
who are interested in the activities of animal rights protesters.” Unfortunately, those
animal activists and protestors were somehow never found.

174
 Revealed: 100 safety breaches at UK labs handling potentially deadly diseases. Source

This scenario was repeated in 2007 with another outbreak in the UK, the source of which
was determined to have been another UK government bio-weapons lab, this time
at Pirbright. At the time, the UK Guardian published an article stating that, according to
the authorities, “a leaky drain allowed the disease to escape”. The Guardian reported that,
according to government sources, there had been a “probable” new leak of foot and mouth
disease virus from the Merial Animal Health facility at Pirbright, the virus believed to
have escaped through a leaking valve, “allowing an unintended probable release
of live FMD virus into the drainage system”. The government claimed in a written
statement to have received Merial’s assurances that “the live virus had not been released
to the environment”, though in fact it had been. A spokesman for Merial apparently told
the Guardian that he was “surprised by the fuss”. Both the government Health Service and
Merial shared the source of this outbreak, the “broken drainage system” which served both
sets of laboratories, though apparently “investigators were strangely unable to determine
which lab was actually responsible for the leakage and outbreak”.

The New Scientist Magazine echoed the official story, stating “A faulty drainage pipe was
the most likely source of an outbreak of foot and mouth disease in Britain on 3 August,
official investigators concluded today. The pipe connected two world class research facilities
on the same Pirbright facility in Surrey. One, Merial Animal Health, is a manufacturer of
foot and mouth and other animal vaccines; the second, the Institute of Animal
Health.” [1]

In June of 2008, soon after the second major outbreak of foot and mouth disease, the UK
media ran a series of articles stating that “Security at British laboratories working with
some of the world’s deadliest pathogens (that included anthrax, hemorrhagic fever and
smallpox viruses), was undermined by a lack of investment and poor maintenance”. The
media articles were in response to a report produced by some government MPs which

175
claimed that the labs were “so dilapidated” and “run down” it was “not acceptable” that
scientists were asked to work there. These facilities, the MPs claimed, had “outlived their
usefulness”, and were in such ruinous condition they were “quite likely to experience” yet
another leakage of deadly pathogens such as those of the foot and mouth virus that
necessitated the slaughter of millions of animals. The committee of MPs especially singled
out the labs at Pirbright and the secretive bio-warfare lab installations at Porton
Down which, the media reported, were “Britain’s frontline defense against infectious
diseases”.

President Gerald Ford apologizing in 1975 to the family of Frank Olson, who died in 1953 after the
C.I.A. gave him a dose of LSD. Credit: Associated Press. View the full documents here and here

It needs to be noted here that neither Pirbright nor Porton Down, but especially Porton
Down, are a ‘frontline defense’ against anything and are in fact bio-weapons labs with a
well-deserved evil reputation and a long and malicious history that includes human
experimentation. This may have been the CIA’s version of a joke, but when anthrax spores
were mailed to some US government and media representatives in 2001, CIA officials
publicly speculated that Porton Down may have been their origin. In the end, the origin
was determined to be (quite possibly courtesy of the same CIA) the US military’s
bio-weapons labs at Fort Detrick, so perhaps a small false flag. Porton Down and
the CIA have been close friends for many decades. It was to Porton Down that the
CIA outsourced many of its “terminal interrogations”, i.e., questioning people until they
died from the questioning methods. It was here that CIA biochemist Frank Olson witnessed
firsthand the results of his ‘biochemistry’, began to suffer unbearable pangs of conscience,

176
then suddenly met his death in most unusual circumstances, the result of an apparent
suicide – as they almost always are. As you will read later, it was eventually revealed
that Olson had been ordered killed by CIA Director Allen Dulles, that his death was
neither an accident nor a suicide, but a deliberate murder to prevent the man
from disclosing to the media the secret crimes of the CIA and Porton Down. US
President Gerald Ford apologised to the family and paid $750,000 in
compensation. So, let’s not pretend Porton Down provides defense against infectious
diseases.According to an “independent” report, the buildings housing the lab facilities that
contained the foot and mouth viruses were apparently “visibly substandard”, were suffering
from a “creeping degradation of standards”, and were “poorly managed and regulated”.
A Dr. Iain Anderson, who led a similar inquiry into the larger similar outbreak in 2001,
was quoted as saying, “This virus should never have got out. [No argument there]
Everything was wrong around Pirbright; the regulatory system was poor; the risk
management was poor”. He further stated, “… the facilities … fall well short of
internationally recognised standards, and the governance and funding
arrangements are muddled and ineffective”. As well, his report described the
laboratories as “shabby and dilapidated”, thus leading to the deadly virus “probably leaking
from faulty pipes”. One British MP was quoted as saying, “When you think about how
important biosecurity is, [… this] is staggering”. No kidding. I would have to agree.

At the time of the release of these so-called independent reports, the media were uniformly
frightening us with claims that “Many scientists believe” that “climate change and
terrorism” would now “bring many new diseases” and cause many pathogens such as
anthrax to be “deliberately released in public places”, though it wasn’t immediately
clear how ‘climate change’ might ‘deliberately release’ anthrax in a public
park. The only scientists who believe that, are the same ‘scientists’ planning the next
release. Those reports were not meant as either an apology or explanation for past
disease outbreaks, but to create fear because a fearful public is malleable and will
easily surrender civil rights to a fascist government in exchange for protection –
most often from that same government. It was also a political statement to justify to
the public the planned expense of a new, and quite massive, bio-warfare pathogen facility
in the UK, one that would of course be “necessary to combat whatever our enemies throw
at us”. Or to produce whatever we might want to throw at ourselves.Aside from the
implausibility inherent in the official narratives of these disease outbreaks, there
are three other curious items I would bring to your attention.

Dr. Mae-Wan Ho. Source. Literary works

177
The UK Government appeared to have prepared precisely for the epidemic of 2001.
From an article by Dr. Mae-Wan Ho in an Institute of Science in Society Report dated
September 24, 2001, entitled “Foot & Mouth Outbreak, GM Vaccine and Bio-warfare
“Investigations by the Evening Chronicle uncovered that the United States, Canada
and Mexico began preparing for ‘a simulated outbreak of foot and mouth disease’
last October. According to papers leaked from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency,
the exercise – which took place between November 6 and 9 – was ‘for the purpose of
emergency planning.’ The papers reportedly state: ‘This exercise is the first of its kind
and provides all three countries with a unique opportunity to apply their
emergency response plans in the event of a real disease outbreak.’ “: [2]

Ominously, the WHO was also involved in these simulations, as it has been in all other
simulations where the identical pathogens have soon after appeared in the public, including
those for COVID-19. It appears that all information and documents relating to the above
simulation, have been removed from the Internet.

In August/September 2000 a company called United Biomedical Inc. based in the USA
had conducted tests on a vaccine for FMD Type O. This is the exact strain of the disease
that is currently infecting UK animals. Bovine sera were obtained from animals
infected with the indicated viruses in biocontainment facilities at the USDA Plum
Island Animal Disease Centre, at the Merial Animal Health Ltd. Biological
Laboratory, Pirbright, UK. [3]

Acrid smoke billows from a “funeral pyre” of burning cattle destroyed in the midst of a devastating
outbreak of foot and mouth disease March 22, 2001 in the town of Unthank, Cumbria in west
England. Over 400 cases of the disease have been confirmed. (Photo by Graham Barclay/BWP
Media/Newsmakers) Source

178
At the same time, the UK Government was reported to be preparing its own ‘contingency
plans’ for a foot and mouth outbreak. The Evening Chronicle reported that officials
from the Agriculture Ministry began telephoning timber merchants as early as
December asking if they could supply wood for pyres, should foot and mouth
strike.” [4] This was months before the outbreak actually occurred.

UK farms appeared to have been targeted in advance, each marked with yellow tapes,
for a visitation from unannounced and unidentified “government animal inspectors”, those
farms being unfortunate enough to earn an “inspection” apparently coinciding with those
suffering an outbreak of foot and mouth disease, with all livestock being destroyed.

According to one report that appeared credible, and there were others, a local resident
named Martin Grant, who lived in Hatherleigh, Devon, described events he observed while
cycling through the countryside in the Spring and Summer of 2001. Grant claims to have
seen yellow tapes tied to fences, hedges, and trees on the roadside at the entrances to
farms in the area. He, and others, later noted that these same locations were those
“inspected” by staff claiming to be government agricultural workers. Though Grant
was not conducting a scientific survey, he later stated that these locations appeared to
coincide not only with the so-called inspections but also with the specific
appearances of foot and mouth disease. He said it all occurred “generally just
about the same time … this seemed to coincide that anyone that got a tape got
foot-and-mouth. As if somebody had deliberately done something.” He was asked
if his impression was that the yellow tapes were, “In other words, to ear-mark the farm
179
for possible infection?” His response was to say, “Yes. That was the impression that
I got…yes.” He added further that at the time, fragments of the yellow tapes were still
hanging on many of the fences.

Another report was from a family named Bratton who lived in the area in question. Mrs.
Bratton reported that she “encountered two men in white overalls outside the cattle shed”
while walking to the buildings on her farm. She had no idea who they were or why they
were on her property and, upon inquiring, was told they were UK Ministry of Agriculture
officials “who had every right to inspect agricultural premises”, and ordered her to go
inside her house because she was not permitted to witness their
“inspections”. Mrs. Bratton said she called the local police several times, was assured
they would investigate and contact her. She claimed she received no response, and
was later informed the police had no record of her prior calls. Shortly thereafter,
all her farm’s livestock was discovered to be infected and were subsequently
destroyed. I have not seen much of the documentation, but there were many apparently
many similar reports of animal inspections from farms suffering the same fate.

Perhaps the most curious of all was the well-documented activity by staff from the office
of the UK Minister of Agriculture inquiring about the supply of lumber (for burning
infected livestock) and the requisitioning of it, prior to any apparent need. There
were at least several published accounts of various government officials or their
representatives inquiring about “combustible materials”, as well as stockpiling
them, and of the issuing of contracts to trucking companies and machinery
operators for ground excavation and for the hauling of dead livestock, several
months prior to the disease outbreak in February of 2001.

One headline stated, “Timber merchants around Britain say that in early February they
were approached by the ministry for wood supplies to burn animals with foot-and-mouth.
Timber merchants say they were approached by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and
Food in early February, before the outbreak was confirmed, to supply wood for the
pyres which are used to burn the diseased animals that have been killed.” UK Agriculture
minister Nick Brown insisted this was part of a “regular contingency planning
exercise”, and added, “There are a number of urban legends doing the rounds that the
ministry knew about this disease before. That is not true.”

Mr. Brown was pointedly questioned about the contacts made by his office with suppliers –
many months prior to the disease outbreak – “to establish the availability of timber, suitable
for use in pyres for burning dead livestock.” The Minister’s reply was to say
that “Information on all the timber stockists contacted by the Ministry over the
last year is not held centrally and could be provided only at a disproportionate
cost.” If that isn’t clear, the Minister effectively stated that his staff created no accessible
records of their approaches to lumber dealers, purchases made and contracts signed, that
any records that did exist were widely dispersed and could be accessed only at
unreasonable cost. That might be true if 50,000 lumber dealers were approached by several
thousand different staff members in a wholly uncoordinated fashion but, if the number

180
of dealers were only in the tens, which is likely, the Minister’s statements beg
some questions.

There is one final matter I would bring to your attention, one which rears its head
in many similar situations. There were many rumors, some articles, and several letters to
the Editor at the time, dealing with what was called a “planned rationalisation” of UK
animal farms, ‘rationalisation’ in this sense referring to the elimination of small
farmers and the concentration of livestock production in the hands of Big
Agra. This would have included, according to these people, increased and prohibitively
costly new regulations which small operators would find onerous or impossible to
implement, preparing the way for small agra to be “eventually absorbed by the multi-
national food processing corporations”. Writers claimed this was one of the ambitions of
then Prime Minister Blair. I do not know if this was the intent, but it certainly was the
result. According to my information, countless thousands of small farmers have
disappeared from the UK, driven out by unrecoverable losses, poor compensation,
and new regulations. And Big Agra has apparently indeed proliferated in the
aftermath, [5] one agricultural website stating that around 85 percent of animals
in the UK are now raised on factory farms”. [6]

I do not know the totality of truths for these outbreaks of foot and mouth disease, nor
specifically how the virus was removed from the secure P-4 facilities and spread around
the entire country. It certainly was not the result of either accidents or activists, and the
weight of evidence would seem to absolutely exclude the possibility of either accidents or
activists., meaning the spread had to be done deliberately. I think we can be forgiven
for suspicions that The City of London that controls so many Western
governments is the most vicious criminal enterprise in the world today.

In light of the above explanations for the release of the pathogen throughout the
UK, and the clearly false official story of animal activists pilfering the pathogen
from the military biological weapons labs at either Porton Down or Pirbright, I
urge you to read carefully the following factual description of these P-4
laboratories and ask yourself what are the most likely conclusions to draw.

NOTES

[1] Faulty pipe blamed for UK foot and mouth outbreak

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12615-faulty-pipe-blamed-for-uk-foot-
and-mouth-outbreak/
[2] Foot & Mouth Outbreak, GM Vaccine and Bio-warfare
https://www.i-sis.org.uk/FootandMouthVaccine.php

181
[3] Foot and Mouth Disease – Lies And More Lies
https://rense.com/general13/lies.htm
[4] Foot & Mouth Outbreak, GM Vaccine and Bio-warfare
https://www.i-sis.org.uk/FootandMouthVaccine.php
[5 Industrial-sized pig and chicken “farming continuing to rise in UK
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/07/industrial-sized-pig-
and-chicken-farming-continuing-to-rise-in-uk
[6] UK Factory Farming Is Booming – When Will We Stop Romanticizing Our ‘Animal
Welfare’?
https://plantbasednews.org/opinion/opinion-piece/uk-factory-farming-animal-
welfare/
[7] Kissinger: Control Food and you Control the People
https://shareverything.com/2016/05/23/kissinger-control-food-and-you-control-
the-people/
[8] Fact Check-No evidence Henry Kissinger ever said ‘control foods and you control
the people’
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-kissinger-control-idUSL1N34J1RD
8.2. Bio-Hazard Facilities

The biological weapons lab at Porton Down in the UK. Source

182
Let’s consider this in a bit more detail and take a look at a typical bio-hazard or bio-weapons
facility, using the UK’s outbreaks of Foot and Mouth Disease and their bio-weapons labs
at Porton Down and Pirbright. For background, and according to UK government
numbers at the time, there were ten laboratories in the country “equipped with the
P4 containment facilities necessary to handle the deadliest viruses and bacteria”
and another 600 labs working with “less dangerous pathogens” at a security
containment capability one level lower. In the UK, Pirbright possesses one such P4
containment facility, with three others at Porton Down. At the time, there were reported
to have been more than 250,000 scientists working with these dangerous
pathogens in Britain. In order to help us evaluate the above claims about thieving
activists, faulty pipes and leaking drains, and the shabby housing afforded to small bottles
of hemorrhagic fever and smallpox, let’s take a quick look at a biological weapons
laboratory or other high-risk bio facility such as those at Pirbright and Porton Down.

Porton Down security fence. Note the “Public Health” and “Science Campus”. Source

Biological Containment is generally categorised by the relative danger the

contents represent, classified as Biological Safety Levels (BSL), ranging from BSL-
1 (lowest danger) to BSL-4 (highest danger), or otherwise identical categories P-
1 through P-4. The P-4 level is lethal, involving work with the most dangerous and
exotic biological agents known to man, all of which cause at least severe illness and most
being fatal to humans, sometimes immediately on exposure. This category includes
anthrax, hemorrhagic fevers, smallpox, Ebola, some strains of lab-created bird
influenza, and things like foot and mouth disease.

These are internationally-described and designated bio-hazard levels, with internationally-

defined containment practices. At the P-4 level, maximum containment is mandatory,
requiring a total, absolute and fail-safe isolation of biological organisms, the procedures
involving an extensive array of physical protection that include the building
183
systems, sealed pressurised rooms and containers, positive pressure suits and
complex and elaborate procedures for entry and exit, as well as intensive
decontamination procedures. Human entry to these facilities is restricted to those
holding top-level security clearances, with overall security being pervasive to ensure
that only specifically-authorised personnel are able to gain access to any area of a
containment zone. Most importantly, the buildings and entire facilities are constructed in
such a way that nothing – and I repeat, nothing – can exit the facility without
intense decontamination and human involvement. In part, this means that nothing
can escape accidentally.

These P-4 facilities are contained in separate, unconnected buildings, often a building within
a building, and which are completely isolated from their surroundings. All buildings are
negatively pressurised to ensure that air pressure will force everything inside to
remain inside. Entry to hazardous areas, which means an area containing anything more
dangerous than KFC’s chemical chicken, is through multiple airlocks which in which both
doors cannot be simultaneously open. Moreover, all doors and windows are sealed with
inflatable seals when rooms and labs are occupied, and each lab contains an elaborate
effluent containment system which prevents anything, of any kind, whether gas, liquid or
solid, from escaping the isolated and confined areas. Even exhaust air cannot escape
the facility without heavy filtering, and the units are constructed with elaborate
facilities for the introduction and storage of air for breathing, including storage
reservoirs, and with HEPA filters that essentially remove even the smallest air-
borne particles.

All air and water service going to and coming from a P4 biolab will undergo similar
decontamination procedures to eliminate the possibility of an accidental release. In
particular, any liquid effluent or other waste must, by design, experience full
decontamination, meaning that prior to discharge, everything will automatically undergo a
tedious process of passing through an extensive, multi-stage, effluent decontamination
system. There are no P-4 biolabs where scientists pour lethal effluent down the
drain at the end of the workday, and in fact any “drains” existing are physically part of
the totally-enclosed decontamination system that is itself physically separated from the
external environment. It is important to understand: this means that even if such a bio-lab
had a “leaky drain”, the effluent would be released inside the containment area, and could
never escape the perimeter. And that means the government and media stories
about leaky drains were all an outright lie.

Within work areas of the facility, all activities are confined to, and all pathogens are stored
in, Class III or better biological safety cabinets, which are locked, which require the
cooperation of two or more individuals for access, and which cannot be entered
without wearing the one-piece ventilated pressure suits with their independent
life support system.

Those personnel gaining access must wear a positive-pressure personnel suit with a
mandatory segregated air supply and life support system. Attendance at a P-4 biolab will
involve not only severe entrance security but exits that use multiple 4- minute chemical

184
and water showers, ultraviolet light, vacuum rooms and a range of other processes and
precautions designed to destroy any trace of a biological pathogen before exiting the
facility. In other words, you will strip naked and undergo chemical showers and
decontamination procedures before you are allowed to leave. Containers or vials of
pathogens cannot be withdrawn from such a facility except by top-level security clearance
into a contained bio-hazard vehicle, and with the participation of several staff members.
There is no way to bypass or shortcut this tedious and severe process, even if you’re an
animal rights activist.

Working inside a biological weapons lab. Source

8.3. Evaluation and Conclusions

Military guardhouse at Porton Down entrance. Source

185
How do we assess the claim that a group of “animal-rights activists” entered
Porton Down, made off with some deadly pathogen and spread it around the
countryside farms, thus spurring an enormous epidemic resulting in the deaths
of millions of animals? First, no ragtag collection of anybody from anywhere would ever
have access to such a facility, much less know how to deal with it. Neither terrorists nor
animal rights activists are renowned Ph.Ds. with high-level security clearances and access
to the top-secret and impossibly-secured facilities that contain these pathogens. And even
if they did obtain access, the chances of any of them escaping the military check-points
and exiting alive, are perilously close to zero. Given all of this, what do we make of the UK
government’s claims that “activists” entered Porton Down, stole “a few” vials of foot
and mouth virus, then apparently walked out of the facility unchallenged and
proceeded to infect cattle and other farm animals, apparently by the hundreds of
thousands? And why would they do such a thing?

Transporting Level-4 biological pathogens. Do these people look like “animal-rights

activists”?. Source

What do we make of the claim that large amounts of foot and mouth virus escaped
through “a leaky drain” at Pirbright? When we have leaks from drains or similar, in all
cases the leaks simply pool on the ground, filling the depressions while waiting to
evaporate. These leaks do not flow around the countryside, and in any case would flow
only downhill in depressions, not covering the countryside. How do we account for the
leaked pathogen winding its way through English hill and dale, visiting and somehow
infecting millions of animals, for hundreds of kilometers in all directions from the
biolab. Viruses are not renowned for (1) their motive ability to travel a
countryside, nor (2) for the necessary tracking radar to hunt down thousands of
animal herds, nor (3) for the aggressive disposition that would lead them to
attack and infect every animal they found. That would almost require an
intelligence – and a vehicle.
186
And, as I pointed out earlier, any “drains” existing are physically part of the
totally-enclosed decontamination system that is itself physically separated from
the external environment. This means that even if such a bio-lab had a “leaky drain”,
the effluent would be released inside the containment area, and could never escape the
perimeter. And that means the government and media stories about leaky drains were all
an outright lie.

But let’s think just a bit further about the government’s independent and unbiased study
and evaluation of these two P-4 facilities from which the disease emerged on two separate
occasions. Given the lethality of the contents and the immense danger to the public
at large, are we really to believe the UK government and the military would
contain these pathogens in facilities that had such poor security (in fact, no
security) as to permit “activists” to just walk in off the street, steal “a few vials”
of lethal pathogens, and just walk out again, without notice or challenge? All you
need to do is use your head. Both Pirbright and Porton Down are Level-4 Military
bio-weapons laboratories under 24-hour military guard. No ‘activist’, animal-
rights or otherwise, could possibly penetrate such an installation without being
shot dead in the attempt.

They must have been wearing Harry Potter invisibility cloaks…

Second, a ‘vial’ is a tiny glass bottle containing maybe 10 ml. of fluid, something
you could easily put into your pocket. But the deadly pathogen was spread
throughout the entire nation and infected many millions of cattle and other
animals, which would require several thousand liters of the pathogen. You cannot
accomplish that with a ‘vial’, and you cannot carry it on a bicycle. So now we have

187
our animal-rights activists approaching a forbidden, off-limits, deadly-force environment,
backing up a 5-tonne truck, loading it with several cubic meters of a deadly pathogen, and
driving away not only unmolested but apparently unnoticed. Further, we must have had
thousands of activists to cover all of England and infect the millions of animals on virtually
every small farm in the country. Even more, they must have been wearing Harry
Potter invisibility cloaks because they did all that unseen and undetected. Why
does this story make sense to you? You don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to
know that somebody is lying to you.

There is another matter. Think back to the description above given by the government
about the “dilapidated state” of the Level-4 biological weapons labs at both Pirbright and
Porton Down. They were apparently “visibly substandard”, with leaking roofs, holes in the
walls, and so forth. But these are the facilities that contain the most lethal
pathogens known to man. Who, in his right mind, would permit such physical
degradation when the only possible result would be to release all those deadly
pathogens into the world and potentially cause hundreds of millions of deaths.
Even more, if the physical descriptions were true, who, in his right mind, would agree to
work in such a place when the only likely result would be death within weeks.

We can also reasonably ask why the UK government refused to conduct an enquiry, and
then agreed to three small enquiries for which the results would not be made public. In a
situation where biological weapons labs are in gross disrepair and where animal-rights
activists stole and released deadly pathogens, all resulting the deaths of nearly 15
million animals. Yet, the government of the day apparently didn’t want to know. And of
course, we can legitimately question why the same government would be scouring the
country to purchase timber to burn infected animals three months before the animals were
infected. When you combine this with the detailed simulation of precisely such an
outbreak, the only possible conclusion is that the event was planned by the UK
government.

Next, these “spontaneous outbreaks” of animal diseases appear more frequently than you
might imagine, in many countries, the mass media not normally devoting many column-
inches to the events. But if you dig beneath the surface in each case, you will find
the same story: small farmers have been largely eliminated, and a few “Big Agra”
companies have moved in to fill the void. The result is that the world’s food
supplies are increasingly concentrated into fewer hands, so that eventually only a
few very large firms will control nearly all the major food needs of the Western nations.

When we review all the evidence in this case, the only conclusion that fits all the
known facts is that this is one of the more egregious examples of criminal
collusion in recent history. Neither Porton Down nor Pirbright are in such “shameful
condition” that scientists should not be asked to work there, and neither are so “dilapidated”
that lethal biological effluents can escape on a whim. These stories were simply rubbish
to smoke up the room and confuse citizens while creating a kind of “plausible
deniability”, for which our Western governments have become so famous.

188
Tony Blair, the UK Prime Minister at the time, was one of the “Young Global Leaders”
who graduated from Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum, and who undoubtedly
subscribed to Schwab’s version of a one-world government controlled from The
City of London, and with its basic precepts including those the stillborn TPP failed
to create: the total control of nations, of energy and food supplies, of commerce
and banking, by a small group of Khazar Jewish financiers and industrialists in
The City of London.

This episode is unquestionably part of the agenda of this aggressive Jewish mafia to take
control of the world’s food supplies. Henry Kissinger stated 50 years ago, “Control oil
and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” [7] Of
course, Reuters immediately “fact-checked” the quote and pronounced it false: “A
spokesperson for Kissinger told Reuters the quote is untrue”. [8] But they are playing with
words, pretending that a paraphrase is irrelevant, and denying the quote. In fact, in 1970,
Kissinger really did say, “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you
control the people”. For those of you who do not already know, Reuters is as dishonest
as the New York Times in presenting falsified information as authoritative gospel
truth. I have seen enough Reuters’ “fact-checks” to immediately toss them into the trash
bin where they belong.

This is also related to the development and propagandised promotion of GM foods. The
result is the same: a few large companies (Monsanto, Cargill, Syngenta, et al) will
control almost all the food emerging from seed crops. If you have been paying
attention, these people have very powerful supporters, including the Chief
Justices of every Western nation. Citizens in many countries are aware of the potential
dangers of GM food, but with the positive media support, few people are aware of the
conflation of events that turns this into a genuine conspiracy. One of the real dangers of
189
GM food is that the seed is sterile, forcing farmers to purchase new seed from these
companies each year. If they refuse to sell, your population will starve. A second fatal
risk is that the US, Israel, the UK, have experimented with splicing every manner
of biological pathogen into these seeds, and with great success. If you don’t die
from starvation, you will die from typhus. Or Ebola or AIDS or H5N1.

But let us not lose the main point. The only conclusion that fits all the known facts of
this case strongly suggest the UK government colluded with the Khazar Jews who
own Big Agra to eliminate the small UK farmers and help them take control of the
UK food supply. This conclusion is strongly supported by the fact that – as almost
always – these people ran a simulation of this precise event shortly before it
occurred.

190
NOTES

[1] Faulty pipe blamed for UK foot and mouth outbreak

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12615-faulty-pipe-blamed-for-uk-foot-and-mouth-outbreak/

[2] Foot & Mouth Outbreak, GM Vaccine and Bio-warfare

https://www.i-sis.org.uk/FootandMouthVaccine.php

[3] Foot and Mouth Disease – Lies And More Lies

https://rense.com/general13/lies.htm

[4] Foot & Mouth Outbreak, GM Vaccine and Bio-warfare

https://www.i-sis.org.uk/FootandMouthVaccine.php

[5] Industrial-sized pig and chicken “farming continuing to rise in UK

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/apr/07/industrial-sized-pig-and-chicken-farming-
continuing-to-rise-in-uk

[6] UK Factory Farming Is Booming – When Will We Stop Romanticizing Our ‘Animal Welfare’?

[7] Kissinger: Control Food and you Control the People

[8] Fact Check-No evidence Henry Kissinger ever said ‘control foods and you control the people

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-kissinger-control-idUSL1N34J1RD

191
 1,000-year-old olive tree at Taurino’s farm. Source

On February 27, 2015, the London Telegraph ran an article by Nick Squires [1] detailing
the danger to olive trees in Italy and potentially all of Europe, caused by a deadly
bacterium brought to Italy from the US, and that was destroying centuries-old
olive trees. He wrote that the disease was first detected in Italy in the fall of 2013 and
had already affected almost a quarter of a million hectares of olive groves. Many trees
that were hundreds of years old, and some 1,000 years old, would all have to be
cut down to prevent further contamination. The cause appears to be a bacterium
named Xylella fastidiosa, which attacks olive and citrus trees, and some grape
vines, causing them to become desiccated and preventing the formation of fruit.

The BBC covered the story with comments that this disease could cost
billions; [2] Bloomberg advised travelers to “see Italy’s olive trees while you
can”; [3] and Scientific American is asking if Italy’s olive trees really need to be
burned to the ground. [4]

But it seems the problem may be more complex (or convoluted) than first assumed. In
August of the same year, Ruben Rosenberg Colorni wrote an article for Global Research
in which he speculated that the biotech industry – GM seeds and plants – might be
responsible for the destruction of Italy’s olive trees, and that the primary underlying cause
may have been the use of chemicals selected for certain species of insects. It seems the
authorities drastically over-simplified the problem “in order to present a threat that
might not even have existed”, blaming a bacterium for the excessive use of GM

192
chemicals. The article further informs us that “[The] commander in charge of
containing the outbreak … stated that simply turning the ground around the olive
trees “has been successful in eradicating 90 percent of the population of insects
vector of the bacteria”.”

Nevertheless, rather than investigate and first attempt less drastic and permanent
measures, the Italian Agriculture Minister inexplicably decided to eradicate all trees
suspected of being infected and all trees in their vicinity. Further, according to Colorni, the
ministry claimed it had received orders from the EU to carry out the eradication, a claim
that was flatly denied by European officials. We can see that something is already very
wrong here. Italian agronomists claim the bacterial agent is being wrongly
blamed and that there is no conclusive scientific evidence of its guilt in the matter,
while farmers and others have become naturally suspicious since the proposed
solution seems excessively radical. Colorni then states the obvious – that the natural
next question is whether the disease is a natural occurrence, something
precipitated by human action, or the result of “foul play”.

Olive plantation with old olive tree in the Apulia Region. Source

Yes, a conspiracy theory. And with apparent good reason.

Colorni notes that in 2010 a group of plant pathologists attended a meeting in

Italy where some American individuals had brought “samples” of the Xylella

193
pathogen from California “for the purposes of scientific research”. Colorni’s further
comments:

“During the meeting, a hypothetical scenario was discussed in which the Xylella
bacteria would be released in parts of Europe as part of an effort to determine
how the countries would react to a “bio-terrorist attack”. This is a bizarre scenario
to imagine … They claim to have disposed of the pathogen, and that the bacteria
present in Italy are of a different variety than the one they had brought. This
could not be known for sure, however, since the lead investigator … has refused
to do a genetic comparison of the allegedly introduced bacteria to those involved
in the current infections.”

In Puglia and in the Mediterranean area, working with olive trees is a thousand-year-old tradition,
still animated today by legends passed down from the region’s ancient inhabitants.According to one
story, a group of farmers challenged the nymphs to a dance competition. As a punishment for their
arrogance, they were transformed into olive trees. There are still those today who swear they can
spot the farmers’ faces in the tree trunks. Source

What do we do with this information? Italy’s olive trees, some being 1,000 years old, are
apparently – but by no means conclusively – being attacked by a bacterium which was
transported to Italy’s olive-bearing areas from the US on the truly unbelievable
pretense of planning reactions to a bio-terrorist attack in which this specific
bacterium would be released all over Europe. This is not only bizarre, as Colorni
194
pointed out, but impossible to be true. The very concept of “terrorists” attacking olive
trees is quite absurd, and planning for such a fantastic event would not possibly involve
importing and releasing the pathogen in the very areas the planning was intended to
protect. If true, this would become an instant classic – the world’s first self-inflicted
terrorist attack. This would be precisely analogous to saying, “Let’s plan a defense
against an anthrax attack by terrorists, by we ourselves spraying anthrax all over
our own country, and seeing how we deal with it”. Does that make sense to you?
Of course not.

So why would ‘scientists’ import a pathogen from the US that apparently (and
suddenly) is found attacking Italian trees, and why are Italian authorities
refusing to do a genetic comparison of the Italian variety with the American
one? And why are Italian authorities apparently determined to destroy millions
of Italian olive trees without even performing such a basic investigation? Given
the lack of evidence of the real cause of this agricultural disease and the proven existence
of what Colorni called “effective alternative policies”, the government’s claims and actions
appear both bizarre and suspicious. You cannot deny this is beginning to stink, because
the facts as presented simply do not correlate and therefore much of the official
story cannot possibly be true.

The Italian police appear to agree, and have apparently begun aggressively confiscating
files and computer hard drives from the national Ministry of Agriculture and various other
so-called ‘institutions’ involved in this fiasco, and regional authorities have placed a freeze
on the cutting down of trees while their investigation continues. Oddly, bizarrely, and
quite suspiciously, the Italian National Minister of Agriculture, the man who
appears desperate to cut down all of Italy’s olive trees, has vowed to file court
appeals against these delays.

195
The plot thickens. Colorni then tells us that critics have good reason for “pointing their
fingers” at the biotech industry because the institution that brought this pathogen
into Italy is funded by biotech companies. To quote further:

“Furthermore the biotech giant Monsanto, known for its predatory

practices, owns Allelyx, a company entirely devoted to the creation of GMO (olive) strains
resistant to the bacteria, and the name of which – what an irony – is Xylella spelled
backwards. Given these links … and the unwillingness of the government to conduct a
thorough investigation, many have alleged that there is collusion between the
government and the biotech industry. The popular belief is that this crisis could have
been engineered for the purpose of eradicating local olive trees. The reasons for this are
still debated, but the dominant hypothesis is to force local cultivators to switch
to GMO varieties resistant to the disease.”

I cannot know how this story will appear to outside readers, but I have lived in Italy for an
extended period and had developed an appreciation of the depth of corruption that
pervades Italian politics and industry. With this, it is very easy indeed for me to
imagine a handful of corrupt Italian politicians and authorities accepting huge
bribes from Companies like Monsanto in return for engineering the destruction of
an irreplaceable portion of their own country’s heritage. And it is even easier for me
to imagine Monsanto imagining such a project. A final thought – which I agree may be a

196
red herring – is that this destruction of olive-producing capacity in Europe would be a gift
from heaven for the American olive industry which produces an inferior product and has
been floundering for a century, and would constitute a similar gift to Israel’s
takeover of Palestine’s West Bank olive production.

Note to Readers: When I first wrote this article some years ago, one could still find much
information on the Internet. However, since then the Internet appears to have been
scrubbed clean of all incriminating information, and no mention can be found of either
Monsanto or Allelyx. This has become increasingly true for so many vital topics in recent
years. One website, the Genetic Literacy Project, states that scientists and GMOs
are responsible for causing the death of Italy’s iconic Olive trees, but the article
now seems to display a “Forbidden” sign. [5]

197
NOTES

[1] Dog detectives to the rescue as Italy battles to save its olive trees

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/12/08/dog-detectives-deployed-italy-battle-against-
blight-devastating/

[2] Deadly olive tree disease across Europe ‘could cost billions’

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52234561

[3] As Eager Travelers Return, Italy Is Losing Its Prized Olive Trees

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-15/a-bacteria-is-destroying-italy-s-prized-olive-
trees-see-them-while-you-can#xj4y7vzkg

[4] Should Italy’s Prized Olive Groves Be Burned to the Ground?

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/should-italy-s-prized-olive-groves-be-burned-to-the-
ground-video/

[5] Activists blame scientists, GMOs for dying iconic Italian

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/09/23/activists-blame-dying-iconic-italian-olive-trees-on-
pro-gmo-plot-block-gm-solution/

198
199
Content
10. 1. China’s 6 Bio-attacks

10. 2. China’s Bird Flu Outbreaks

10. 3. China’s “Pork Speculators”

10. 4. China-Targeted Bio-Weapons

10. 5. China COVID-19

10. 6. Beijing COVID-19

10. 7. China’s Second COVID Attack; 2022

10. 8. Hong Kong COVID-19

10.9. SARS, MERS, ZIKA, EBOLA

10 . 9. 1. Let’s Look at SARS

10. 9. 2. Let’s Look at MERS

10. 9. 3. Let’s Look at ZIKA

10. 9. 4. Let’s Look at EBOLA

I have assembled here a brief collection of recent events that meet all the criteria for
biological weapons attacks, including the astonishing dissembling in the mass media. If
we examine the detail, none of these events could possibly have been accidental
or occurred within the realm of nature.

10.1. China’s 6 Bio-attacks

Shanghai Coronavirus Lockdown 2022

200
It wasn’t reported in the West, but China suffered a total of 6 serious biological attacks
within two years – 2020 and 2021, COVID-19 being one of these. There were a deadly
variant of swine flu, various concentrated outbreaks of bird flu, some of very deadly
pathogens, with simultaneous outbreaks of unusual pathogens all exhibiting an unusual
manifestation, and none of which had a clear natural source or origin. The question is,
why China? The media propaganda narrative implied that China (or China’s vegetable
markets) lacked sanitary cohesion, but the truth is that China is well above most countries
in Asia in sanitation, India being perhaps the worst example. Logic encourages us to ask
why India doesn’t have dozens of pathogen outbreaks, and why all these
epidemics occurred only in China, and why all at the same time. And of course
logic also induces us to ask who has around 100 biological weapons labs
surrounding China and Russia.

10.2. China’s Bird Flu Outbreaks

Workers inoculate the newborn chickens with avian flu vaccines at a chicken hatchery in Shandong
province.Photographer: Chu Baorui/Feature China/Future Publishing/Getty Images. Source

China was hit with virtually simultaneous eruptions of several variants of bird flu during
these two years. H5N6 was almost unheard of in China but is a virus with a high mortality
rate. According to Reuters, these infections “show the risk of fast-changing
variants”. [1] Reuters also reported that “The number of people in China infected
with H5N6 bird flu this year has jumped, raising concern among some experts,
who say a previously-circulating strain appears to have changed and may be more
201
infectious to people.” [2] No information on where the strain was “previously
circulating”, nor how it managed to change into something more lethal.

Then the UK Guardian [3] and the BBC informed us that “China confirms first human
case of H10N3 bird flu strain”. The WHO and FAO noted that this is “not a very common
virus”, with no information as to its origin or source. The BBC informed us that “China
sees first human case of rare H10N3 strain”, with no indication of how a human in
China managed to become infected. [4] There was also an eruption of the H9N2 variant,
which was a milder form, with mortality not a serious risk. It was fortunate indeed that
the Chinese authorities managed to identify these outbreaks and corral them
immediately, before they were able to do any harm.

10.3. China’s “Pork Speculators”

People shop for meat at a new supermarket in Binzhou in China’s Shandong province. Pork prices
have soared this year as an outbreak of African swine fever decimates hog herds. (AFP/Getty
Images). Source

In 2019 and 2020, right in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, China was hit almost
simultaneously with several biological attacks, one being a nation-wide wave of deadly
swine flu, necessitating the culling of around 100 hundred million pigs – China’s
main meat source. This was a new strain, the disease first detected in China near
its border with Russia, who had also experienced the same kind of outbreak from
202
the same strain of the virus, the Russians claiming with some certainty the
pathogen had been deliberately released from the US Lugar military biological
weapons lab in Georgia. In China, the pathogen was distributed with small drones
flying over countless thousands of farms while spraying something. [5] [6] This
was a well-organised effort, since there many of these drones reported. One large farm
was so inundated with these drones that the owner set up a jamming system to upset their
navigation systems. In this case, he had to desist because his jamming systems were
interfering with aircraft landings at a nearby airport. [7] [8]

When news of this epidemic emerged, much of the Western media, including Hong
Kong, immediately flooded their pages with claims that Chinese “pork
speculators” or possibly “Chinese gangs” were responsible for this. The explanation
was that they could then buy (diseased) pigs cheaply, with no detailed analysis offered for
their subsequent disposal. [9] It is of interest that only two years ago there were literally
dozens of US news media reports about this, but a search today produces zero results
for “pork speculators“, which cannot possibly be an accident. But let’s ignore the media
claims for a moment and try to apply some logic.

First, many laboratories in many countries research such pathogens as swine flu, but the
amounts necessary for research typically are a cupful. The volume of pathogen
necessary to infect and\or kill 100 million pigs would be at least tens of thousands
of liters. Where would our ‘pork speculators’ obtain such a volume of a deadly
pathogen? The nearest 7-11? Wal-Mart? The only source of any pathogen in that
volume would be a military bio-weapons lab where it was created for use. There
is no evidence that China has any such labs but for the moment let’s assume they do
have. How would the “pork speculators” gain access to it? What do you suppose would
happen if you and I went to such a military installation and said, “Good morning. We would
like to buy 5,000 liters of anthrax, please.” Exactly. And if the Chinese did have such a
facility, they would be unlikely to supply people wanting to kill most or all of their own
country’s meat supply.

Perhaps more to the point, in any country, WHO would have access to these facilities
and the pathogens contained therein? Only agencies of that government. Nobody
else. And certainly not civilian “pork speculators”. Logic permits us to dismiss the
possibility of the pathogen arising from a Chinese facility, so what would be the source?
We don’t have a smoking gun, but China and Russia are surrounded by about 100 American
military bio-weapons labs. There is no other likely source for such a volume of
pathogen, and no other country with a likely motive or with ample experience in
this area, which means the swine flu epidemic in China was almost certainly a US biological
weapons attack. And the media flood about “pork speculators” was merely a supporting
propaganda effort meant to pre-empt rational thought on the part of readers and lead
everyone down the wrong path.

The New York Times then told us that, however it happened, it was all China’s fault.
According to an article ostensibly written by a Mr. Yanzhong Huang, self-styled as “a
global-health expert specializing in China”, Swine fever devastated China’s stock “because

203
with unsound governance, even sound regulations have perverse
effects”. [10] Mr. Huang did not elaborate on how an American bio-weapons attack would
constitute “unsound governance” on the part of China, but then this is the New York
Times we are reading. Worthy of note is that two years prior, Russia was hit with an
outbreak of the same pathogen, the first time such a thing had ever occurred in
the Southern Caucasus region, and the Russians apparently had much
circumstantial evidence that this pathogen was released from the Lugar US
biological warfare lab in Georgia.

In a Western country, with 50% of the livestock slaughtered, American Big Agra firms
would have had an open door to take control of the nation’s pork supply. But the Chinese
government, not being a party to the pathogen, immediately provided financing and other
assistance for the small farmers to rebuild their herds. The event did, of course, inflict
a significant financial blow to the Chinese economy already suffering from the
COVID slowdown, and I assume this was the purpose. However, if the multiple pathogen
outbreaks had succeeded in escaping confinement, the entire country would have been
devastated. No government can deal with the unknown prospects of COVID-19, the
swine flu and multiple outbreaks of various strains of deadly bird flu all at the
same time. The Chinese government deserves enormous credit for having
contained all of these at the same time. There is no other government in the world
that could have done this.

10. 4. China-Targeted Bio-Weapons

China-Targeted Bio is worrying that there have been persistent claims arising
from scientific sources in many countries that the US has been collecting Chinese
genes for incorporation into a gene-specific bio-weapon. As we will see, there is
much justification for suspicion on this matter, including strong evidence that various
recent diseases appearing in China appeared almost certainly to have had a laboratory
origin, with one Chinese Air Force official flatly stating that several diseases, including the
H7N9 Flu outbreak, were engineered by the US as a gene-specific bio-weapon. Given the
strong evidence, it is difficult to dismiss these claims out of hand, and there certainly is
no shortage of evidence of large-scale American efforts to collect Chinese DNA.

The British Medical Association, in an article on Biotechnology, weapons and

humanity, [11] revealed that FBI crime labs in the US, while doing routine work, “have
stumbled across genetic markers specific to blacks, whites, Hispanics and native
Americans; (and that) the same markers have been discovered in Palestinians,
setting them apart from Israelis. And in an article on the bird flu virus in August of
2013, Susanne Posel [12] [13] wrote that British and Chinese researchers
discovered a genetic variant common to the Chinese that make them more
susceptible to swine flu, apparently some 25% of Chinese having this gene variant which
is also common to Japanese and Koreans. [14]

204
In 2012, The PLA Daily, China National Defense, published an article revealing a strong
suspicion that American universities and scientific researchers were collecting the
genes of ethnic Chinese for the purpose of developing ethnic-specific bio-
weapons, discussing some evidence of a Top-Secret military project involving the
participation of large numbers of American non-military NGOs and other American
organisations in China, largely on the pretense of “assisting” in medical research or
helping to control AIDS. And we do have incontrovertible proof of American
universities Harvard [15] [16] and Tufts [17] coming into China on precisely such
missions for the US military, performing “studies” and “experiments” that were later
uncovered and universally condemned as illegal and fraudulent. Even the Washington
Post agreed that “This was no ordinary blood drive. It was genetic research.” [18]

American scientists may be collecting the genes of ethnic Chinese people for the purpose of developing
genetically engineered bioweapons, reports China National Defence, a military newspaper
sponsored by the PLA Daily of the People’s Liberation Army. Source

It was outrageous and infuriating that as soon as these clandestine, illegal, dishonest – and
definitely criminal – events were revealed, the Jewish US media, ignoring the actual facts,
went into full attack mode with a flurry of news releases and articles claiming that it was
China that was attempting to collect DNA on Americans. The New York Times led the
parade (as always), telling us “U.S. Warns of Efforts by China to Collect Genetic
Data.” [19] The NPR was right behind them, claiming, “China Wants Your Data — And
May Already Have It.” [20] The Business Insider claimed, “China is scooping up DNA
data to target … you, the US government says.” [21] But not a mention anywhere of
the massive frauds that the US military, universities, and pharma companies, had
recently committed in China.

205
The fear of course is that the US military, which has never hidden its desire for such
weapons, hopes to develop pathogens and GM seeds that will mutate the genetic structure
of certain racial groups – of which the Chinese is definitely one. The report stated evidence
that the US had already developed some genetic weapons directed to African and
Middle Eastern races, which used viruses implanted in winemaking yeast that
would infect specific populations.

10.5. China COVID-19

Distribution of Patients with Covid-19 across Mainland China. Source

I will dwell here on only one segment of this topic, that of the source and
distribution of COVID-19 in China. The Western media, beginning with Radio Free Asia,
were at first unanimous that the virus emerged from the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan.
When this was proven an impossibility since many infected persons had had no contact
with the market, then the new Western narrative was that the outbreak resulted from a
“leak” at the biological labs at Wuhan University.

206
But when China counter-attacked with Fort Detrick as the most likely source, the
media narrative quickly changed to bats, and even the CIA suddenly agreed there
was no sign of a lab leak.

But the greatest leap of all in the logic of the entire COVID affair was the timing
and location of the outbreak, the idea that either a natural occurrence or an
accidental escape of a pathogen would occur in one of China’s main transportation
hubs on the eve of Chinese New Year, when literally tens of millions of travelers would
be leaving or passing through that precise location. This is China’s annual migration – the
world’s largest – where several hundred million people would be traveling home for
Chinese New Year. If I were a pathogen wanting to escape confinement, I couldn’t
do better. Utilising this one location at that specific time would virtually
guarantee an instant nationwide epidemic of biblical proportion, spreading the
infection throughout the entire country within 24 hours, with the potential to set
China’s economy back 30 years in one swoop. That is simply too much of a
coincidence for any thinking person to accept.

10.6. Beijing COVID-19

Distribution of COVID-19 infections, fatalities and mortality rates (fatalities/infections * 100) across
the prefectures of China (updated on 23 May 2020), and the distribution of the tropospheric column

207
amounts of three representative air pollutants derived from the 2019 averaged satellite measures of:
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Formaldehyde (HCHO). The values in the
square brackets show the COVID-19 cases’ counts of administrative units.Source

By late May of 2020, Beijing had been virus-free for nearly 60 days. I recall having an
uncomfortable feeling that this wasn’t the end, my fears justified when Beijing
experienced a new outbreak in the Xinfadi market. [22] The media immediately hit
us with a small flood of propaganda that Beijing was experiencing its “second wave” – a
characteristic of COVID-19 that had been heavily promulgated by the media in
spite of the clear fact that no epidemic in history has ever exhibited second and
third or fourth natural ‘waves’. And yes, I’m aware of the 1918 pandemic, but that was
a special circumstance and unrelated to what happened with COVID. We were also hit with
repeated claims that “China’s wet markets” were a natural breeding ground for pathogens,
and that this latest outbreak “showed how the virus can still come back as
restrictions are eased”.

But the media went silent rather quickly from an announcement of “a groundbreaking
virus tracing discovery” in China, [23] which was that the strain of the new virus
in Beijing was the same as that in much of Europe, that this variety had never
before been detected in China and was clearly an import. Dr. Daniel
Lucey confirmed a Reuters report [24] [25] on the genetic sequencing that “the virus
is from a different continent”, and thus was clearly imported. It was also much
more contagious – and more deadly – than previous varieties. The China Daily also
confirmed studies that the virus likely came to China from Europe. [26] PubMed confirmed
the outbreak [27] and Science Magazine stated “Source of Beijing’s big new COVID-
19 outbreak is still a mystery” [28]

Xinfadi is the largest fresh-food market in all of Asia, equivalent to nearly 160
football fields, with many thousands of shops. According to reports in China, the
entire market was “severely contaminated” “from head to foot” while nothing in
the surrounding area was touched. It was obvious the contamination entered the
market – and only the market – from a source external to China. This was an entirely
new version of the virus (Type A) that had not been in China before, a much more virulent
strain (at least to ethnic Chinese) and one which, had it escaped confinement, might have
created a humanitarian disaster. Fortunately, the authorities had not relaxed their vigilance
and discovered the infections almost immediately, shutting down the market, locking
down the neighborhood, tracing all the contacts, and killing it dead within two
weeks with only a handful of infections.

The question is how a new variety of a virus could travel from another continent to
Beijing without leaving infections along the way. And this new virus was traveling
with friends if it could infect 160 football fields in a couple of days. Virus outbreaks always
begin on a very small scale, and then expand, so what would be the source of such an
enormous amount of pathogen released in one place at one time? Consider the
astonishing coincidence of a new strain of a virus migrating from Europe, crossing
half of China without leaving a trace, then choosing to land on and infect only that
one location in Beijing, the largest market in all of Asia with hundreds of
thousands of visitors each day, while not leaving a trace anywhere else, and

208
sparing every other possible victim, even avoiding shops literally across the
street. That would almost require an intelligence. And a large pail. To forestall
such conclusions, the Western media placed a news embargo on this topic
immediately upon the facts being released.

In this context, recall the information about a natural epidemic starting small,
gaining traction while infecting a core group, then expanding. But the Xinfadi
market started with totally infecting 160 football fields of shop space. This isn’t done by
a “patient zero”, but rather by a large group carrying perhaps 1,000 liters of
pathogen. How can it be otherwise?

10.7. China’s Second COVID Attack 2022

A patient with Covid-19 lays on a bed in a hallway at Tangshan Gongren hospital in north-east
China. Photograph: Noel Celis/AFP. Source

China had been virus-free for a long time, with all segments of life having returned to
normal, but then the country began to experience persistent attempts at outbreaks in
various provinces, all of which the Chinese medical authorities quickly quashed. Those
cases at first appeared to be ‘local’ domestic infections that were minor but that
seemingly appeared from nowhere, with no clear source, and no patient zero
located. At first, the infections appeared in only one or two provinces in very small
numbers, but it seemed that as the authorities quashed one eruption in one location, others
would appear simultaneously in several other locations. It was a constant battle, with
new outbreaks in previously clean provinces, the number of these independent
and unrelated outbreaks continually increasing. Then China was hit suddenly with
new infection outbreaks in half its provinces, the numbers suddenly jumping from a mere
209
handful to nearly 3,500 new infections on one day, this huge spike described as
“complicated and severe”. [29] Again, no clear epidemiology, no identifiable
source(s), and no patients zero. [30] If you look at the graphic below, China went from
around zero to this in literally a week. Note the vertical spike at the right of the graph,
something natural virus outbreaks cannot do.

China Mainland subsequent COVID outbreaks. Source

210
When watching these developments live from day to day, it became obvious quite quickly
that something abnormal was taking place. Again, China had been completely free of
the COVID virus and life had returned to normal. There was no sensible reason
for these outbreaks in areas that had been clean for many months. As one fire
was extinguished, several others would break out, always in different provinces,
and sometimes different strains, which would indicate independent outbreaks
with no relation to each other. This was not a pattern of a natural spread of an
infection, but clearly the repeated imposition of an infection of various strains in
locations far distant from each other, and all happening simultaneously. The
Chinese authorities were certainly aware of this; if it was obvious to me that China was
under attack, it was much more obvious to them. When we examine all the details
of this series of events, the only possible explanation is of an organized biological
weapons attack on China. In the end, this persistent series of outbreaks covered
all provinces and overwhelmed the system, and the virus spread until it naturally
died out.

10.8. Hong Kong COVID-19

Hong Kong, like mainland China, had been pursuing a “zero-tolerance” COVID strategy that
sought to curb infections with strict control measures. The city was at the end of its virus
epidemic with only small numbers of new daily infections, then – and more or less
simultaneously with the sudden increases in the Mainland – Hong Kong was blasted with
an enormous epidemic, suddenly and inexplicably reaching nearly 60,000 cases
in one day. That was more than in the entire US, and with only 2% of America’s
population. [31] [32] [33] The outbreak was so sudden and so widespread Hong
Kong recorded nearly 700,000 COVID-19 infections in about two weeks. And again,
no identification of the source of this massive infection spike and obviously no hope of
finding a “patient zero”.

That astonishing explosion of COVID-19 could not possibly have resulted from
any combination of natural events. A natural pathogen outbreak begins with a
single source, essentially a patient zero, and progresses from this, according to
its infectiousness and other factors.

According to all of science, an outbreak of a pathogen begins from a single central

source, infects a core group, slowly gains some traction, then expands rapidly,
reaches a peak, then slowly tails off and dies, essentially following a skewed Bell
curve as in the diagram below.

Look at the chart below. The numbers of infections in Hong Kong were approximately zero
until February of 2022 when an epidemic exploded. The city had been virtually free of
the virus but then it suddenly exploded to infect nearly 60,000 people on one day.

211
 Hong Kong COVID-19 Infections. Source

No natural outbreak of an infectious disease can suddenly explode and infect tens
or even hundreds of thousands of people simultaneously. The reason is that the
212
pathogen is “infectious”; it can spread only by infecting people who then infect others. It
is not possible to infect huge numbers of people simultaneously, yet this is precisely
what happened to Hong Kong. Further, the infections were not localized; it wasn’t
as if 75,000 people were in the same football stadium and all sprayed with a
contagion. The infections occurred simultaneously in multiple locations, and there
is no natural process that can account for this.

Such a violent and widespread outbreak can occur only through the coordinated
distribution of a pathogen by a large number of individuals infecting many
locations simultaneously. There is no other possible explanation. Hong Kong has
open borders, making this kind of infiltration rather easy.

10.9. SARS, MERS, ZIKA, EBOLA

I will cover these individually in more detail in later Chapters of this series, but will make
a quick summary here.

213
10.9.1. Let’s Look at SARS

How SARS terrified the world in 2003, infecting more than 8,000 people and killing 774. Source

We don’t know how SARS was created and released, but we do know the official
narrative as presented in the Western media was false from beginning to
end. And if the media are promulgating a lie, we know they are covering for those
responsible. Why else would they do it? Let’s look at only one part of the SARS
epidemic, the “super-spreading event” at the Amoy Gardens residential complex
of 30 and 40-story buildings, home to almost 20,000 people that experienced a massive
outbreak and had to be evacuated. Virologists were unanimous in categorising this
as “the most spectacular event” of the entire SARS crisis.

The official (Western media) narrative flood told us the virus was spread through
defects in the building complex’s drainage or sewage system, Wikipedia adding poetically
that the virus “was blown by a gentle maritime breeze” from the toilet sewage pipes
into the stairwells and thence to all the apartments. We don’t need facts here; we just
need to use our heads.

What would be the source of the huge amount of SARS pathogen required to infect all those
buildings, and what would be its means of locomotion? Why would it choose to gather in
volume in that one location, and how could it do so? Do SARS viruses form flocks? By
what means would such a huge amount of this coronavirus enter the sewage systems in
the first place? The sewers are all underground; there is no entry point. How could
a breeze, ‘gentle maritime’ or otherwise, possibly enter the sewage system of a
huge apartment complex? Is there a hole in the external wall where all the toilet
pipes emerge? Next, to blow air and pathogen from an underground sewer upwards to
infect all apartments on 40 floors of 10 buildings would require more than a gentle
breeze – more likely a hurricane.
214
I am not a plumber, but a “defective sewage system” in a high-end high-rise apartment
building does not seem to possess the claimed qualifications to distribute lethal pathogens
to all apartments. In any case, aside from the initial – and unsubstantiated – claim, there
were no reports either before or after the outbreak to suggest any plumbing defects ever
existed. The story sounds plausible to a casual reader until we stop to think about the
practical logistics. After all, sewage and drainage pipes are no doubt dirty places which
make a happy home for germs of all kinds, but those germs are there because we put them
there each time we dispose of waste. They don’t enter a building and seek out the
drainage pipes of their own accord, then run around independently like mice
looking for a place to hide, and lurking until victims approach. Nor do they spread
throughout a building and intentionally enter each home. Either case would require
an intelligence. And a large pail.

Upon the outbreak of SARS, the immediate conclusion by Russian virologists that
the SARS virus “absolutely” originated in a lab. It was interesting that while SARS
emerged first in Guangdong Province, fate led the infected persons to travel to Hong Kong
where the virus spread. The health officials in the Chinese Mainland snuffed it out
immediately while Hong Kong took the hit, and SARS was statistically a Hong Kong
epidemic rather than Mainland Chinese. That almost sounds like an attempt that
failed.

10.9.2. Let’s Look at MERS

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a lethal zoonosis that causes death in
35·7% of cases. The Lancet

215
In late 2012, the world experienced the onset of a new mini-epidemic from a novel
coronavirus that was named MERS because it supposedly originated in the Middle East,
infecting small numbers of people in Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Qatar. The virus was
blamed on camels which, after millennia of friendly cohabitation with man,
suddenly decided to share their virology with humans.

The outbreak in Korea was the largest manifestation of MERS outside the Middle
East, hitting that country with economic damage in the billions. According to the
official narrative in the Western media, South Korea’s infections were apparently
traced to an (unidentified and almost certainly fictitious) “businessman” who
developed MERS after returning from a trip to the Middle East.

One item neglected by the media was the massive outbreak of MERS at the US
Osan Air Base in Korea, which conveniently was very near the home of the likely-
imaginary ‘infected businessman’. The Osan airbase is the home of the US JUPITR
ATD, a military biological program that operates its other lab facility at Fort
Detrick, MD, as well as home to one of the US military’s bio-weapons production
labs and a very secretive WHO bio-lab operated by the US military. The theory most
closely fitting the facts is that the MERS outbreak in Korea may have been caused by
a laboratory accident at the JUPITR biowarfare project. Interestingly, there was
sparse Western media coverage of the MERS outbreak in South Korea, certainly compared
to SARS, where we were treated to virulent China-bashing 24/7 for most of a year.

10.9. 3. Let’s Look at ZIKA

Cumulative suspected and confirmed cases of Zika virus disease per 100,000 population — Region of
the Americas,* October 2015, January 2016, and December 2016. Source

216
 An unremarkable little virus so mild most people don’t even know they have it, and one
that had never done any harm to anyone. ZIKA is spread only by mosquitos and never
traveled anywhere in its entire life, remaining sequestered in a forest in Uganda
where it was discovered.

But then one day ZIKA developed a kind of viral wanderlust and traveled 12,000
kilometers or so, crossing the Pacific Ocean, the US and Mexico, all of Central
America and the Caribbean, and finally traversing all of South America to land on
the Atlantic side in Rio and São Paulo. From there, it almost instantaneously radiated
outward 4,000 or 5,000 kilometers in all directions to cover most of Brazil, then spread to
all of South and Central America and the Caribbean, flooding more than 20 countries
within a few months, voyaging as far as Mexico and Puerto Rico.

How did this happen? Well, according to the WHO and the Western media, ZIKA
was brought to Brazil by an infected traveler from Micronesia who had come to
watch the World Cup. Here once again, we don’t need facts; we just need to use our
heads. ZIKA is not a contagious disease; it is spread only when bitten by an infected
mosquito. If the (fictional) traveler had indeed been infected, how many millions
of clean local mosquitos would have had to bite this unfortunate Micronesian, to
become infected themselves, and then infect millions throughout Latin
America? And they would have to do all of that within a very short time because a
mosquito’s life is measured in days and they had thousands of kilometers to
travel. To cause such a rapid outbreak would require hundreds of millions of
infected mosquitos. Even more, how could infected mosquitos traverse all of
South America? Can mosquitos fly over the Andes? How could they travel 10,000
or more Kms. to flood 20 countries in a few months? How did they travel the
12,000 Kms. to Brazil in the first place? You know the official story cannot possibly be
true.

ZIKA was given massive prime time Western media coverage, replete with photos of
graveyards, tombstones, urns filled with wilting flowers. Why? The number of people who
had experienced even mild illness from ZIKA was perilously close to zero, and no person
had ever died from it. What was happening? Two things. First, something that was
heavily censored in the Western media: a UK company named Oxitec had for several
years been conducting “transgenic mosquito trials” throughout Latin America,
pretending to mate their mosquitoes with the local variety to produce sterile
offspring, releasing hundreds of millions of mosquitoes in all countries. It was after
this that the outbreak of ZIKA occurred.

The second thing was that ZIKA was being tarnished with tales of brain damage
to infants, tales entirely lacking medical or logical foundation, but propagated
nonetheless. On the heels of these tales, and interspersed with them, was the sudden
awakening or resurrection of literally hundreds of US-based and funded NGOs all
campaigning loudly – with massive media support – for all of Latin America to
abandon its laws against abortion – for the sake of all these ZIKA-infected mothers

217
who would now give birth to infants with “devastated brains”. But in fact there was never
any connection made between ZIKA and microcephaly.

And that is the entire story. The pro-abortionist NGOs are primarily Jewish, as are
the media, and as is Oxitec with its funding and connections naturally including
the usual group of suspects. The only conclusion that fits all the known facts is
that ZIKA was deliberately unleashed, using pre-infected mosquitoes, as part of
a plan to eliminate the anti-abortion laws in Latin America – the world’s only
holdout.

10.9.4. Let’s Look at EBOLA

A woman crawls toward the body of her sister as a burial team takes her away for cremation on
October 10 in Monrovia, Liberia. The sister had died from Ebola earlier in the morning while trying
to walk to a treatment center, according to her relatives. (John Moore/Getty Images) . Source

There was also the outbreak of the Ebola virus simultaneously in several African countries
in the middle of 2014 that at the time of writing had already killed around 1,000 people. It
was surprising to learn that the variety of Ebola that appeared was “an especially
powerful mutated strain that had no apparent natural origin and immediately raised
questions in many minds of having been engineered. This caught my attention because the
218
circumstances seemed so familiar – (a) a sudden, inexplicable outbreak of a new,
unusual, and deadly disease, (b) in dispersed but focused locations, (c) with
nobody searching for the origin, (d) claims that the virus was primarily race-
specific, affecting primarily Africans, and (e) the WHO once again in full
attendance.

In June of 2003, the Wall Street Journal had an interesting

article [34] titled, “Scientists Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle Virus”, stating
that “Some scientists are turning their attention to a question asked all too
infrequently once deadly viral outbreaks have been contained: Where did that
come from?” The article provided a long list of mostly new diseases resulting from
(probably) manufactured retroviruses like Ebola, Hantavirus, HIV, HTLV-I, HTLV-
II, Lassa, Mad Cow Disease, Monkey Pox, Nipah, SARS, and West Nile Virus, as
well as other curiosities like Gulf War Illness and Lyme disease, asking, “Where
did the pathogens originate?”

Several physicians wrote an article titled, “There is no natural disease called

Ebola”, [35] in which they noted that while the main focus was on treatment, an increasing
number of people were questioning the disease’s true origin, a decreasing number of
investigators being convinced of the official story of Ebola evolving from “infected fruit
bats”, and much skepticism about how Ebola traveled 6,000 kilometers across Africa
– from the site of one US bio-weapons lab to another – without causing infections
in the intermediate areas. The Washington Post tells us these statements “may plant
further seeds of mistrust and suspicion” on the authorities. [36] However, these
physicians and virologists insist there is no such natural disease, and believe it is
a weaponised virus created in a US military bio-lab. [37] [38] One media report, for
which I have not yet seen documentation, claims the US Department of Defense was
funding Ebola trials on humans in the weeks preceding the outbreaks in Guinea and Sierra
Leone. No word on precisely which organisation was physically conducting the trials, but
the DOD apparently had a $140 million contract with the Canadian pharma
company Tekmira to conduct Ebola research that included infusing humans with
the Ebola virus. [39] The Liberian Observer ran a rather stinging editorial on this matter,
but the article appears to have been deleted or suppressed.

Further, I managed to locate some records of the WHO’s vaccination programs for
the countries in Africa where this Ebola virus erupted, and was not surprised to learn
of the correlation with WHO inoculations since there has been a perfect correlation with
other similar incidents to date. [40] [41] [42] Yoichi Shimatsu noted what he calls “the
strange coincidence of the earliest breakout in Guinea with major vaccine
campaigns conducted by the WHO and UNICEF. [These involved] a cholera oral
vaccine effort by Médecins Sans Frontières under the WHO, and UNICEF-funded
prevention programs against meningitis and polio. The reason for suspecting a
vaccine campaign rather than an individual carrier is due to the fact that the Ebola
contagion did not start at a single geographic center and then spread outward
along the roads. Instead, simultaneous outbreaks of multiple cases occurred in
widely separated parts of rural Guinea …”. Shimatsu wrote, “How one of the
deadliest viral strains in human history could have jumped a distance of 4,000

219
kilometers undetected from Central to West Africa defies logic.”, and I would
certainly have to agree with his assessment.

There was another disturbing aspect to this entire Ebola enterprise, that being a report in
the New York Times that the Zaire Ebola strain was identified or created many years
ago, [43] [44] and that the WHO ordered it shipped to the UK’s bio-weapons
facility at Porton Down, from where it was sent to the US-based CDC who do
similar work. [45] [46] Dr. Boyle speculated this virus was then exported to the US
military’s bio-labs in West Africa where development was continued. Yoichi Shimatsu noted
correctly that “the simultaneous eruptions [of this virus] in widely-separated
zones” suggest it was introduced as part of the US military-funded bio-weapons
research program.

220
NOTES

[1] Rise in human bird flu cases in China shows risk of fast-changing variants: experts
https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/rise-human-bird-flu-cases-china-shows-risk-fast-
changing-variants-health-experts-2021-10-26/

[2] China’s Guangdong reports human infection of H5N6 bird flu

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-guangdong-reports-human-infection-h5n6-bird-flu-
2021-12-11/

[3] Bird flu: China sees first human case of rare H10N3 strain
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/01/china-confirms-first-human-case-h10n3-bird-flu-
strain-man-jiangsu

[4] “H10N3 Bird flu” Avia influenza: China report first human case of ‘H10N3 bird flu’
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57326075

[5] Chinese gangs use drones to spread African swine fever

https://www.fox5ny.com/news/chinese-gangs-use-drones-to-spread-african-swine-fever

[6] The Chinese gangsters using drones to spread African swine fever
https://thechinaproject.com/2019/12/16/the-chinese-gangsters-using-drones-to-spread-african-
swine-fever/

[7] Chinese pig farm jams drone of crooks spreading African swine fever
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/china/chinese-pig-farm-jams-drone-crooks-spreading-african-
swine-fever-n1105631

[8] 炒猪团无人机投放非瘟病毒，大北农为防范却干扰了民航GPS
https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_5273995?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0

[9] Chinese criminal gangs spreading African swine fever to force farmers to sell pigs cheaply so they
can profit
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3042122/chinese-criminal-gangs-spreading-
african-swine-fever-force

[10] Why Did One-Quarter of the World’s Pigs Die in a Year?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/01/opinion/china-swine-fever.html

221
[11] Biotechnology, weapons and humanity II
https://www.reteccp.org/primepage/2020/virus20/weaponsnhumanity.pdf

[12] Study: Chinese Genetics Cause Them to Become Susceptible to Swine Flu
https://www.badpolitics.ro/study-chinese-genetics-cause-them-to-become-susceptible-to-swine-flu/

[13] Genetic variant linked to swine flu

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/science/2013/01/30/genetics-may-explain-severe-flu-chinese-
people/aEFGtc4hzp55JEULEORAgK/story.html

[14] Scientists Identify Gene Variant Linked To Swine Flu In Han Chinese
https://www.asianscientist.com/2013/02/health/gene-variant-linked-to-severe-flu-han-chinese-
022013/

[15] Harvard University’s Fraudulent Chinese DNA Exploitation

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/4252/

[16] Genetic Research and U.S. Bio-Agents: Harvard Team Collected and Transferred China Blood and
DNA Samples Back to the U.S.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/genetic-research-and-u-s-bio-agents-harvard-team-collected-and-
transferred-china-blood-and-dna-samples-back-to-the-u-s/5704728

[17] Tufts University’s Fraudulent China Golden Rice “Experiment”

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/4517/

[18] An Isolated Region’s Genetic Mother Lode

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/12/20/an-isolated-regions-genetic-mother-
lode/4280cf1f-ae9c-42f7-b132-9ddbe26e502f/

[19] U.S. Warns of Efforts by China to Collect Genetic Data

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/22/us/politics/china-genetic-data-collection.html

[20] China Wants Your Data — And May Already Have It

https://www.npr.org/2021/02/24/969532277/china-wants-your-data-and-may-already-have-it

[21] China is scooping up DNA data to target foreign spies — and you, the US government says
https://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-dna-data-could-allow-targeting-spies-dissidents-citizens-
2021-3?r=US&IR=T

[22] Beijing closes market, locks down area in new virus outbreak
https://news.yahoo.com/beijing-closes-market-locks-down-113540088.html

[23] China’s CDC experts investigate Xinfadi market three times, announce groundbreaking virus
tracing discovery
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/06/covid-19-china-reseeded-with-covid 20.html

[24] Beijing imposes curbs as coronavirus returns to Chinese capital

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-idUSKBN23M0A8

[25] Beijing steps up coronavirus measures as dozens of cases emerge from a food market
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-cases-idUSKBN23L01I

[26] Salmon called unlikely virus source

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202006/15/WS5ee6b33da310834817252ec9.html

[27] Coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Beijing’s Xinfadi Market, China

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33962683/

222
[28] Source of Beijing’s big new COVID-19 outbreak is still a mystery
https://www.science.org/content/article/source-beijing-s-big-new-covid-19-outbreak-still-mystery

[29] China hit by its biggest Covid-19 outbreak

https://www.rt.com/news/551797-china-biggest-covid-outbreak/

[30] Chinese mainland reports 1,337 new local COVID-19 cases

https://www.shine.cn/news/nation/2203143079/

[31] Hong Kong reports 32,430 COVID cases, 264 deaths

https://www.astroawani.com/berita-dunia/hong-kong-reports-32430-covid-cases-264-deaths-351673

[32] Coronavirus case numbers won’t be coming down any time soon: Hong Kong experts
https://www.scmp.com/topics/coronavirus-hong-kong

[33] Coronavirus: 1,337 new local cases recorded in China’s ‘difficult moment’ of pandemic
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3170366/covid-19-china-reports-1337-locally-
transmitted-cases-895-new

[34] Wall Street Journal – Scientists Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle Virus
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10559743167269800

[35] ‘There is no natural disease called Ebola’

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_101807.shtml

[36] A professor in U.S. is telling Liberians that the Defense Department ‘manufactured’ Ebola
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/09/26/an-american-professor-is-
telling-liberians-that-the-u-s-manufactured-ebola-outbreak/

[37] U.S. is Responsible for the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa: Liberian Scientist
https://www.globalresearch.ca/a-liberian-scientist-claims-the-u-s-is-responsible-for-the-ebola-
outbreak-in-west-africa/5408459

[38] Federal Funding in Support of Ebola Medical Countermeasures R&D

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389695/

[39] https://www.thestandard.co.zw/2017/08/05/usa-epidemic-spreading-africa/
https://www.thestandard.co.zw/2017/08/05/usa-epidemic-spreading-africa/

[40] The Ebola Breakout Coincided With UN Vaccine Campaigns

https://rense.com/general96/ebobreakout.html

[41] Ebola Made by Pharma & DOD, Injected by UN – Dr. Broderick

https://eclinik.net/ebola-made-in-the-usa-by-big-pharma-dept-of-defense/

[42] Rebirth of Empire & The American Role: The Global Biowarfare and Ebola Serum
https://www.21cir.com/rebirth-of-empire-the-american-role-the-biowar-ebola-serum/

[43] There Before Ebola Had a Name

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/health/there-before-ebola-had-a-name.html

[44] Ebola Poses High Risk in Congo, W.H.O. Says

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/world/africa/ebola-congo-outbreak.html

[45] How Ebola went from killing 11,000 people in one year to being on the verge of a cure
https://www.businessinsider.com/ebola-virus-timeline-possible-cure-2019-8

223
[46] Ebola given to more than 250 mice and monkeys at Porton Down weapons research centre in
effort to understand deadly virus
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2827505/Belfast-patient-tested-Ebola.html

224
Contents

11. 1. Some Background

11. 2. Fredrick Cancer Research Center – CIA, NIH, CDC

11. 3. Dr. Robert Strecker

11. 4. Dr. Leonard Horowitz

11. 5. Dr. Horowitz on Professor Jakob Segal

11. 6. Dr. Boyd Graves

11. 7. Dr. Alan Cantwell

11. 8. The WHO

11.9 . The WHO Vaccination Programs

11. 10 . Spread of AIDS in the US

11. 11 . Epilogue

225
 US President George W. Bush (R) announces a new $500-million USD International Mother and
Child HIV Prevention Initiative as US Secretary of State Colin Powell (L) looks on 19 June 2002 at the
Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC. Through a combination of improving care and
drug treatment the program seeks to prevent the transmission of HIV/AIDS from mother to infants
and to improve health care delivery in Africa and the Caribbean. AFP PHOTO/Paul J. RICHARDS
(Photo by PAUL J. RICHARDS / AFP) (Photo by PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP via Getty Images)

If we want to engage ourselves in a conspiracy theory worthy of the name, what

would it take to convince us that HIV was a man-made virus developed as a
biological weapon by the US Defense Department? What kind of proof would we
want?

226
Would it help if we had evidence that a medical researcher from the Defense Department
appeared before the Senate Defense Appropriations Committee, where he requested (and
received) $10 million to fund the research and development of a human immuno-
deficiency virus (HIV)?

Conveniently for us, this is precisely what we have. On Tuesday, July 1, 1969, a Dr. Donald
MacArthur, representing the US Department of Defense, did indeed appear before
the Senate Defense Appropriations Committee, and made precisely such a request.
The context was a presentation to Congress on the creation and development of “Synthetic
Biological Agents”, i.e., man-made biological weapons.

The full title of the Session was: Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970. Hearings
before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations; House of Representatives,
91st Congress, First Session, Subcommittee on Department of Defense
Appropriations; Part 5: Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (of synthetic
biological agents). The Session was chaired by Rep. George H. Mahon. [1]

Another document of value is this one: From the Official U.S. Govt. Documents House of
Rep. Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970; H.B. 15090; “The transcript that
follows is taken from the June 9, 1969 Senate testimony of Dr. Donald MacArthur, a high-
level Defense Department biological research administrator. Funding was approved in 1970
– $10 million to the DOD.” [3]

Following is a summary of the official transcript for House Bill 15090 that approved the
funding. Dr. MacArthur was waxing eloquent about the development of biological weapons:

“There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One
is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very
rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would
be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not
naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.”

Committee member Rep. Robert L.F. Sikes asked, “Are we doing any work in that
field?“, to which Dr. MacArthur replied, “We are not.” Mr. Sikes asked whether this were
due to “Lack of money or lack of interest?“, to which Dr. MacArthur replied, “Certainly
not lack of interest.” Upon request from Mr. Sikes as to the “advantages of such a program”,
the time frame and cost, Dr. MacArthur stated the US military had been examining this
attractive possibility for years, and provided the following information:

227
“We will be very happy to (provide this information). The dramatic progress being made in
the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to
biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the
following observations: Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible
to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important
aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that
it might be refractory [i.e. resistant and immune to cures, and will not respond to
treatment] to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to
maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. A research program to explore the
feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10
million.” His testimony was clearly about the potential development of an AIDS-
like-virus as a biological weapon, especially with this pathogen being “a synthetic
biological agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity
could have been acquired”.

MacArthur then decried the lack of resources and enthusiasm for this biological
weapons program, stating “There are not many highly competent scientists in the
field, almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported
from sources other than DOD.” He also wasn’t blind to the human and ethical implications
of such a program. He confided to the Congressional committee the “growing criticism” in
scientific circles of the military’s “tentative plans” for such a program, noting also that “It
is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research
should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large
populations.” However, Dr. MacArthur dismissed these humanitarian concerns by informing
the Committee that this matter of developing an immuno-deficiency biological weapon was
“an important area of potential military technological inferiority” on the part of the
US.

MacArthur continued to testify about the disappointing lack of enthusiasm for this bio-
warfare program, informing the Congressional Committee that “… it was considered
possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences –
National Research Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC and
tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However, … growing criticism of the CB
program, and our [resulting subsequent] reluctance to involve the NAS-NRC in such a
controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the last 2 years.”

MacArthur was informing Congress that neither the National Academy of Sciences
nor the National Research Council could be trusted to participate enthusiastically
or in secrecy, and the DOD therefore considered them undependable
collaborators. Dr. MacArthur ended with the observation that without full knowledge of
how to construct such a biological weapon, there was “little that can be done to devise
defensive measures”. Some observers have used this last comment as proof that the US
military’s intent in this field was entirely defensive in nature. However, I wouldn’t put too
much stock in such a claim since, as we have seen, the US military’s bio-warfare
research has been far from ‘defensive’.

228
Nevertheless, an appropriation was made by the Committee, the money granted, and ten
years later the first cases of AIDS emerged. The theory that the AIDS virus arose
from US Defense Department experiments became difficult to refute.

11.1. Some Background

While hosting Defense Secretary Robert McNamara at the LBJ Ranch on 22 Dec 1964, President
Lyndon B. Johnson reacts to news of new problems in Vietnam. (Corbis). Source

It is not news that the US military had for many decades been pursuing the development
of biological pathogens for use against mass populations, including race-specific pathogens.
It is also not news that HIV had been strongly suspected from the beginning as originating
from this source. Here is a brief summary of the evidence.

The story begins in earnest when Robert McNamara was the US Secretary of Defense.
McNamara was the man who engineered the extensive biological weapons programs
in the US[4] and the North Korean genocide, [5] the biological warfare on
China and North Korea, the vast Project Phoenix death-torture program in Vietnam, the
man who approved sending about 500,000 retarded young men to battle in
Vietnam, [6] then poured millions of liters of dioxins on the country’s agricultural
land. [7]

229
 Immediately prior to the time of our HIV story, McNamara engineered what must
surely have been the largest program of biological weapons development and
testing that has ever existed, an umbrella scheme consisting of more than 150 separate
projects involving every branch of the US military and many other government agencies
and Departments, all of which were secretly conducted on a massive scale and which were
intended to destroy all plant, animal and human life in any region the US chose to attack.
I covered this in a 3-part series titled “The US Government Declares War on
America.” [8][9][10] Even reading those few references above, which provide an
incomplete catalogue of McNamara’s sins, it is almost impossible to avoid the
conclusion that McNamara was criminally insane.

McNamara ordered the military Joint Chiefs of Staff “to consider all possible
applications” of these agents to produce a “total biological and chemical deterrent
capability”, the plan approved by then-President Kennedy in National Security Action
Memorandum 235 (NSAM 235), which meant it was a secret and highly-classified
program directed to total biological and chemical warfare against humans,
animals, and plants. You can find this evidence in the JFK Presidential
library, [11] among other places. [12]

It is also relevant that McNamara had always been active as a staunch supporter of
population control, a eugenicist taken with the prospect of exterminating large
portions of the world’s peoples and propagating sterility to prevent their re-
breeding. This applied especially to blacks, and generally to the world’s surplus
poor. When he later became President of the World Bank, one of his first speeches was
to a group of international bankers in which he deplored the world’s increasing population
and in which he stated, “Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly
or the current death rates must go up. There is no other way.” His statements,
clearly referring to genocide and sterilisation, were so outrageous that even his
own staff believed he was crazy, but his convictions were couched in humanitarian
terms, McNamara making the extraordinary statement that “(those) who were dying were
fortunate, for the millions of those who lived languidly on were stunted in their bodies and
cripples in their minds.” (See Epilogue)

Our HIV story begins immediately prior to McNamara leaving his position as US Secretary
of Defense to move to the World Bank in 1968, since one of his last acts before leaving
was to put into motion the funding and development of a human immuno-
deficiency virus, the plague we would later come to know as HIV. The thoughts of
this plague, and its planning and basic research, had been in his mind and in the minds of
the US military for some time, and which culminated in the public request by Dr. Donald
MacArthur for Congressional funding to develop precisely this pathogen.

But let’s go back a few steps. This was by no means the first time the US government and
military had held such attitudes or conceived such notions. You will recall that
in 1948, George Kennan, Director of the US State Department’s Policy Planning
Staff, published a then top-secret document (PPS 23, February 24, 1948), [13] in which
he outlined America’s need to dispense with the “luxuries of altruism and world-

230
benefaction” and “unreal objectives such as human rights” in its quest for world
domination. Kennan’s philosophy has been one of America’s guiding principles ever since.

We can go back even farther than this, and refer to an approving article about the prospect
of deadly biological weapons in Time magazine from June 3, 1946, titled “Better Than
The Bomb”, [14] reporting on the details of the US Senate Military Appropriation
Hearings of May 1946, where the discussion is on the allocation of funds for the
creation of a secret biological warfare agent.

And what were they discussing? Well, it would appear that the US military, courtesy
of George Merck, the President of the pharma company then known as Merck, Sharp &
Dohme, had succeeded in “a very significant discovery” which was the crystallisation of
the disease agent mycoplasma – which we know today as the cause of the Gulf War
Syndrome that infects hundreds of thousands of US military servicemen and millions of
Iraqis. This was a milestone in bio-weapons research because it meant the
pathogen could now be indefinitely “stored, transported and deployed without
deteriorating” and could be “be delivered by other vectors such as insects,
aerosol or the food chain”.

Donald W. Scott wrote an excellent and authoritative article on mycoplasma [15] in which
he stated that “Researchers extracted this mycoplasma from the Brucella
bacterium and actually reduced the disease to a crystalline form that was now
effectively a useful battlefield weapon.” I would note it was researchers
at Rockefeller University who first resolved that virus particles were protein crystals,
among many other bio-warfare and battlefield-useful discoveries. The US military
isolated and weaponised their Gulf War mycoplasma more than 40 years before
they had an opportunity to use it on a wholesale basis, unless of course they applied
it in Korea and Vietnam – which they may have done. According to Dr. Scott, “Brucella is
a disease agent that doesn’t kill people; it disables them.

Dr. Donald MacArthur, referred to above, made his own valuable contribution to this
development, as also discussed in his appearance before the Congressional Committee in
1969. MacArthur testified that researchers had “found that if they had mycoplasma
at a certain strength … it would develop into an incurable disease for which the
body has no natural immunity [like AIDS], and the person would die … because it
could bypass the natural human defenses.” He claimed that researchers discovered
that if the pathogen were weaker (less concentrated), the person would manifest
with chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia. He further testified that if the
pathogen were weaker, the victims would not die but would become severely disabled and
lose all interest in living, that Brucella (the source of the original mycoplasma) was “a
disease agent that doesn’t kill people; it disables them”. They would present as
wasting; they wouldn’t die and they wouldn’t be disabled, but they would not be
very interested in life; they would waste away.” [16] But his proposal before
Congress was that he and his scientists could re-work this disabling pathogen and
weaponise it so it would quickly kill.

231
And of course, from Dr. MacArthur’s stellar testimony, the US Congress eagerly allocated
the requested $10 million and indeed “a disease-causing organism … refractory to the
immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative
freedom from infectious disease” (HIV) appeared within the stated “5 to 10 years”, then
found itself suddenly dispersed into the human population simultaneously on three
different continents.

MacArthur not only received his Congressional funding and succeeded in creating the HIV
virus, but the US government obtained a patent for “a method of (the) continuous
production of retroviruses (HIV) …”. The patent number was 4647773, patent
application number 06/602,946, filed on April 23, 1984 and issued on March 3, 1987. The
creators were listed as Drs. Robert C. Gallo and Mikulas Popovic, both of Bethesda,
MD, and assigned to “the Government of the United States of America as represented by
the Department of Health (Washington, DC)”. We might ask ourselves why the US military
would be interested in creating and patenting a method for producing HIV in large
continuous volumes. It was at about the same time, in the late 1960s, that a group of bio-
warfare experts testified to a UN panel that “large-scale killing operations of a general
population” would cost $2,000 per square kilometer with conventional weapons,
$800 with nuclear weapons, and $1.00 with biological weapons. As Dr. Alan
Cantwell wrote, “Governments are always seeking new biological warfare agents, just as
they are always seeking more powerful military weapons. Bioweapons are indeed the
cheapest form of warfare. They kill yet they maintain the infrastructure …

11.2. Fredrick Cancer Research Center – CIA, NIH, CDC

Source

232
As noted, Congressional funding was approved for the development of an HIV
virus, under H.R. 15090. Interestingly, the project was under the supervision of the
CIA, while being developed by the military in its top-secret biological weapons
facility, the Army’s Special Operations Division at Fort Detrick.

But both the science and politics were rather more complicated. For one, it was necessary
to combine the best of American innovative ability and criminal ingenuity in one place and,
for another, the HIV was actually a cancer-causing virus that had been under simultaneous
development by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI). In fact, it was at the NCI that a
special program had already been initiated by the US Navy to develop cancer-
causing viruses which included the precursor to HIV. We normally imagine that a
National Cancer Institute would be involved in searching for a cure for the
disease, but this is America and things are different here.

This was why, on October 19, 1971, then-President Nixon issued an order to merge the
US military’s biological warfare facilities at Fort Detrick with the cancer research
branch of the National Health Service and the facilities and functioning of the
National Cancer Institute into a new unit named the ‘Fredrick Cancer Research
Facilities’. So most everything was then at Fort Detrick, but pretending to involve
itself in research on the causes, treatment and prevention of cancer, and was
publicised in the media as the country’s “War on Cancer”. If that doesn’t qualify as
a “false-flag operation”, I can’t imagine what would. Of course, since the US military
launched its war on cancer, the number of annual cancer deaths has more than
doubled.

“One of the cooperative activities at Fort Detrick’s Biological Warfare Division since early
1962 had been a top-secret project named the “US Special Virus program“, one in which
the US military had been researching what was called a “virus particle” into which they
could splice DNA from another virus, and which would then work to destroy the
natural defense mechanisms of the human immune system. In particular, the
researchers had been attempting to modify the genome of an HIV-related animal disease
called Visna that appeared also to have been man-made but that existed only in sheep to
that point. Many observers, including many prominent medical authorities, believed that
this “declaration of war on cancer” was merely a cover for a new biological
weapons program, and several researchers have claimed this effort was an integral part
of what was known as the military’s Project MK-NAOMI.”

“The 1971 annual report of Nixon’s so-called War on Cancer noted that one of the primary
tasks of the now jointly connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer
Research Center was “the large-scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing)
and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing
basis.” Special attention was given to primate viruses and “The successful propagation
of significant amounts of human candidate viruses.” In simpler terms, this new
“research center” was tasked with the “large-scale production” of cancer-causing
viruses with special attention to primate viruses that could be adapted to human
cells. This Special Virus Cancer Project (SCVP) was the birthplace of genetic

233
engineering, molecular biology, and the human genome project. This was
essentially a new field of species-jumping immuno-suppressive animal
retrovirology, and pioneering the field of genetic engineering which allows
scientists to insert genes into bacteria and viruses, infect bacteria with viruses,
and to efficiently transfer genes in both directions among animals, humans, and
plants, and between animals, humans and plants.”

“When the explosive content of this SCVP program was revealed, the CIA
immediately destroyed most of the records; the first seven volumes were apparently
shredded in their entirety but a few copies of volumes 8 and 9 survived, and it was
these that contained the flow chart discovered by Dr. Boyd Graves. The surviving
documents also provided solid evidence that US military scientists had been
working on pathogenic retroviruses as early as the 1960s.”

In Peter Grose‘s 1994 book, “Gentleman Spy, The Life of Allen Dulles“, [17] he wrote:

“Helms sought Allen’s approval for a major project ‘to develop a capability in the covert
use of biological and chemical materials, . . . . From the start . . . CIA officers made no
pretense that this project would be an innocuous matter of pure science. The research
would have to proceed ‘without the establishment of formal contractual relations,’ Helms
advised Allen; the existence of signed contracts would reveal the government’s
sponsorship. Moreover, the scientists qualified to do research in this field ‘are
most reluctant to enter into signed agreements of any sort which connect them
with this activity, since such a connection would jeopardize their professional
reputations.”

“. . . five years later a CIA audit justified the extraordinary secrecy of the
project: ‘Precautions must be taken not only to protect operations from exposure to
enemy forces but also to conceal these activities from the American public in general.
The knowledge that the Agency is engaging in unethical and illicit activities would
have serious repercussions in political and diplomatic circles.’ For years to come CIA
auditors defended the absence of normal accountability on grounds of professional
discretion within the scientific community, dubious legality, and the dangers of
public disclosure. Neither Congress nor the president was informed. . .“

There was more. At the same time, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
entered a long-term contract with this new Harry Potter Cancer Institute, to participate
fully in the new Special Virus Cancer Program. MIT’s Project Director for this program
was Dr. David Baltimore, [18] touted as “the nation’s leading expert in biological
warfare using immune suppressive viruses”, with many medical experts stating the
MIT studies were mostly done with AIDS-like viruses.

Then we have a firm named Litton Bionetics Research Laboratories[19] who, during
the 1960s, conducted “fourteen biological-weapons-testing contracts” for the
DOD. The firm later signed another long-term contract with the NIH to supply “Support
234
Services for the Special Virus Cancer Program”. Also, at around the same time, Litton were
conducting what they called “Primate Inoculation and Disease Induction Studies”, which
involved the mass propagation of various infectious agents and recombinant lab-created
viruses. It is of more than minor importance that Litton’s research involved the
methods of “causing diseases by inoculation”, i.e. injection or vaccination. And in
1972, Litton Bionetics entered into another six-year contract with the NCI to develop and
test AIDS-like-viruses under the direction of NCI’s Project Officer, Dr. Robert Gallo, who
would later be credited for the discovery (and the patent) of HIV.

During this period as well (late 1970s), Pfizer Pharmaceutical. Over “28,000 liters of
virus harvest fluids” were produced in 1977, and which were apparently shipped
to “approximately 140 laboratories throughout the world”. There were also many
American universities involved in the overall HIV development process, most of whom have
deleted this participation from their official histories. The New York University Medical
Center was named several times in the New England Journal of Medicine reports on the
vaccine trials, as a biological weapons contractor to the US Army, and included in a
list of approved contractors to a Congressional Appropriations Subcommittee.

11.3. Dr. Robert Strecker

THE STRECKER MEMORANDUM. Source

Dr. Robert Strecker, a practicing gastroenterologist with a Ph.D. in pharmacology,

studied this issue and stated “I don’t think there is any doubt that AIDS is a man-
made problem. The question is whether it was created either accidentally or
intentionally. I believe the AIDS virus was requested, predicted, produced, and
deployed.” According to one detailed report:

235
“Strecker’s research indicated the AIDS virus was developed by the National Cancer
Institute, in cooperation with the WHO, in their laboratories at Fort Detrick, in the
US Army’s germ warfare unit, known as the Army Infectious Disease Unit, by combining
bovine leukemia virus and Visna sheep virus, and injecting them into human
tissue cultures. The Bovine Leukemia virus is lethal to cows but not to humans;
the Visna virus is deadly to sheep but not to man. However, when combined, they
produce a retro-virus that can change the genetic composition of the cells they
enter. He said, “If one analyses the genes to the human AIDS virus and the genes of the
Bovine Leukemia virus of cattle and the Visna virus of sheep, and compares them, the
genes appear related.” He asked how it was possible that this combined virus that produced
an AIDS-like disease in 1971 or 1972 was never analysed until 1987, when it was so
closely related to AIDS that it must almost have been its precursor.” [20][21][22]

11.4. Dr. Leonard Horowitz

Documentary: Emerging Viruses and Vaccines by Dr. Leonard Horowitz

236
 Dr. Horowitz has written extensively on this topic, providing much additional and
circumstantial detail to the story. Two of his articles can be accessed here [23] and
here [24] He writes, “Claims that these “emerging viruses” naturally evolved and
then jumped species from monkey to man seem grossly unfounded in light of the
compelling evidence … Alternatively, the possibility that these bizarre germs were
laboratory creations, accidentally or intentionally transmitted via tainted
vaccines in the U.S. and Africa-as numerous authorities have alleged – is
investigated herein.” Dr. Horowitz is the author of “Emerging viruses : AIDS and
Ebola : nature, accident, or intentional?“, which examines the emergence of these
two biological elements and the role played by vaccines in their distribution. His
book can be accessed at archive.org. [25]

Another longer article published in August of 2000 on this matter of engineered bio-
weapons that was titled, “The CIA and the West Nile Virus“, [26] had a section by Dr.
Horowitz on the possibility of AIDS having been made in a lab. According to Dr.
Horowitz:“The theory that AIDS originated in the laboratory has been circulating
in Europe, particularly in West Germany, since late 1986. The theory hinges on
the claim that the AIDS virus (HIV) is virtually identical to two other
viruses: Visna, which causes a fatal disease in sheep but does not infect humans, and
HTLV-I (Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus), which infects humans but is seldom fatal.”5.

11.5. Dr. Horowitz on Professor Jakob Segal

Professor Jakob Segal

Prof. Jakob Segal, [27] the author of the [above] theory, says that structural analysis
using genome mapping proves that HIV is more similar to Visna than to any other
retrovirus. The portion (about three percent) of the HIV genome which does not
correspond structurally to Visna corresponds exactly to part of the HTLV-I
genome. This similarity, says Segal, cannot be explained by a natural process of
evolution and mutation. It can only have resulted from an artificial combination
of the two viruses.”

237
“He notes that the symptoms of AIDS are consistent with the complementary effects of two
different viruses. AIDS patients who do not die of the consequences of immune
deficiency show the same damage to the brain, lungs, intestines, and kidneys that
occurs in sheep affected with Visna. Combining Visna with HTLV-I would allow the virus
to enter not only the macrophages of the inner organs but also the T4 lymphocytes and
thus cause immune deficiency, which is exactly what AIDS does. As further evidence that
HIV is a construct of Visna and HTLV- I, Segal cites studies which show that the reverse
transcription process in HIV has two discrete points of peak activity which correspond,
respectively, to those of Visna and HTLV-I. Thus, according to Segal, AIDS is
essentially a variety of Visna.” “Scientific journals, Segal says, have refused to publish
or discuss his theory. This is difficult to understand. If he is wrong, he should certainly be
refuted. The cornerstone of the theory is that HIV is a combination of Visna and
HTLV-I. Segal claims that any trained laboratory technician could produce AIDS
from these components, today, in less than two weeks. If this is true, it should be
demonstrable by experiment.“

In fact, Segal’s position was quite simple. “He concluded that since Visna was already
known and understood, military scientists needed to find a human retrovirus which, when
combined with Visna, would enable it to infect humans. Segal says scrutiny of the
literature revealed that Dr. Robert Gallo isolated such a virus, HTLV-I, by 1975.” In
1985, Science Magazine published an article stating that Visna and HTLV-1 were “very
similar, indicating a close taxonomic and evolutionary relationship”. And according to the
National Academy of Sciences, HIV and VISNA are highly similar and share all
structural elements except for a small segment which is nearly identical to HTLV-
1, all of which naturally led to speculation that HTLV and VISNA were combined to
produce a new retrovirus to which no natural immunity existed. And in 1987,
the Journal of the American Medical Association published a paper concluding that
HIV/AIDS had indeed evolved from Visna.

In researching Segal’s position, Michael Morrissey made some interesting observations

and, in a long article, details some of the difficulty in approaching the issue, since
contradictory claims of almost every nature are seemingly not in short supply. The true
origin of AIDS is not a topic by which we win friends.

According to Morrissey: “The theory of the African origin of AIDS, that it developed in
African monkeys and was transferred to man, has been abandoned by most
researchers. All of the known varieties of SIV (Simian Immunodeficiency Virus) are
structurally so dissimilar to HIV (much less similar than HIV and Visna) that a common
origin is out of the question. Furthermore, even if such a development by natural
mutation were possible, it would not explain the sudden outbreak of AIDS in the
early 1980s, since monkeys and men have been living together in Africa since the
beginning of human history. The “Africa Legend,” as it is called in a 1988 West German
(Westdeutscher Rundfunk) television documentary, is further debunked by the
epidemiological history of AIDS. There is no solid evidence of AIDS in Africa before
1983. The earliest documented cases of AIDS date from 1979 in New York. It would
not be surprising if the government wanted to keep this quiet, but what about the press? I
could find only two references to MacArthur’s testimony, in a book by Robert Harris and
Jeremy Paxman (A Higher Form of Killing: The Secret Story of Chemical & Biological
238
Warfare_, NY: Hill & Wang, 1982), [27a] and in a couple of articles by Robert Lederer
and Nathaniel S. Lehrman in _Covert Action Information Bulletin (28, summer
1987, and 29, winter 1988).” [28]

Even the WHO appears to confirm the relationship. This from a WHO article in 2021:
“HTLV-1 is a retrovirus which causes a chronic lifelong infection in humans. Its
transmission happens through breast feeding, sexual contact and blood transfusions and
is similar to the HIV virus.” [29]

11.6. Dr. Boyd Graves

See it in normal size by clicking ref. [30]

One of the more prominent, and perhaps the most damaging, discoveries was by Dr. Boyd
Graves, who obtained a copy of the now-famous flow chart of the entire development
process for HIV, in fact the blueprint for its creation. Dr. Boyd Graves was a virologist, and
a graduate of the Annapolis US Naval Academy and law school, who became suspicious
of the nature of the origin and apparently simultaneous distribution of the HIV
virus on several continents and for years diligently researched the matter,
repeatedly using the US courts to pressure the government to release various
documents on military viral research activity. In most instances he was stonewalled
by the government in his search for several tens of thousands of documents he believed
could reveal important truths. One of the documents he did obtain, very likely by accident,
contained a five-page fold-out flow chart that appeared to completely document
all the steps and stages of the engineering of the HIV virus, a document he claims
(as do others) “provides absolute proof of the true laboratory origin of HIV, as a
‘synthetic biological agent‘”. This flow chart is a very large document, consisting
of five full pages. You can download it here. [30]

He says the flow chart proves that HIV was not an accident but resulted from the
intentional development of a military pathogen, and further that the continuing
“progress reports” issued by the developers detail each step taken and the results. Graves
claims the evidence is compelling that HIV arose as a “designer by-product” of
239
the US military’s Special Virus Program. He notes that the flow chart – which
remained “missing” until 1999 – “links every scientific paper, medical experiment
and military contract”. This flow chart was contained in “Progress Report #8”, the first
60 pages of which detail the progress to date and the specific goals of the entire HIV
program, and of which Page 61 contains the flow chart itself.

Phase V of the flowchart documents that this new pathogen would soon be used
in “clinical trials” by vaccination, which Graves claims is proof that the vaccines
were “complemented, not contaminated”, that the HIV was added by Merck to the
experimental hepatitis B vaccines given to gay men in New York City, Los Angeles
and San Fransisco, and to the smallpox vaccines administered on a massive scale
– by the WHO – to blacks in central Africa, during the late 1970’s and early 1980’s.
Graves claims that by 1977 the Special Virus Program had succeeded in producing 15,000
gallons of HIV fluid, which was then added to vaccines in Africa and the US.

In one of his legal cases seeking a court order for the release of further documentation,
Graves apparently presented the court not only with the flow chart but with a letter dated
May 15, 2000, from Dr. Victoria Cargill who was the medical officer of the Office of AIDS
Research at the National Institute of Health. In that letter, Dr. Cargill apparently
declared that the flowchart was indeed the flowchart of the HIV virus – which
would appear to be an official document from the US government admitting to the
creation of HIV. The evidence is that Dr. Cargill “located the flowchart, as well as some
of the Progress Reports of the Special Virus Program from the archives of the National
Cancer Institute and wrote a letter to that effect.” Graves claims she referred all this
evidence to Dr. Allen S. Rabson, a Director at the National Cancer Institute, who
immediately destroyed all of it. According to Graves, the reason was that Rabson was
on the 1971 HIV/AIDS developmental committee and his name appeared in the Progress
Reports.

11.7. Dr. Alan Cantwell

240
Dr. Cantwell has written extensively about the manufacture and distribution of
HIV. He is the author of Queer blood : the secret AIDS genocide plot, [31] as well
as a book titled “AIDS and the Doctors of Death”, which can be accessed at
archive.org. [32] There are also two videos available. ; Part 1 [33] and Part
2. [34] Here are a few of his observations:

“There is no proof that AIDS, which first appeared exclusively in young, primarily
white, gay men in Manhattan, came from Africa. This is yet another myth about AIDS.
How could a supposed black heterosexual African epidemic transform itself into an
exclusively white young gay men’s disease in Manhattan? In my opinion this is biologically
impossible. Furthermore, there was no “incubation period” for HIV in America. As
soon as the government-sponsored gay hepatitis B experiment (1978-1981)
ended in Manhattan in 1981 the epidemic became official. The first cases of AIDS
in gay men appeared in Manhattan in 1979, soon after the vaccination experiment
began.”

“Before the U.S. government took an interest in the health of gay men, there were
no “strange fatal diseases” of obscure origin found in homosexuals. As soon as
they signed up for government-sponsored gay vaccine experiments, the
community was doomed and ravaged with the AIDS epidemic and the
concomitant Karposis sarcoma epidemic. And recall that for the first few years
the U.S. government basically ignored the disease, except to gather statistics. I
honestly believe the release of HIV via vaccine programs was an experiment using
gays and African blacks as testers, and that the disease was allowed to spread
intentionally.” [35]

He also states there were no proven cases of AIDS in Africa prior to 1979, and that from
the very beginning the standard narrative was that HIV originated with primates in Africa
and the entire thrust of the media and government-paid investigation consisted of an
attempt to “prove” this origin. Cantwell claims correctly that this is not at all the same as
a sincere search for the true origin. To quote Cantwell: “There has never been a serious
discussion of man-made AIDS in the New York Times or in any other major media
outlet, except to refer to the theory as paranoia and conspiracy theory. As I said,
the man-made theory of AIDS has remained taboo for more than a quarter-century, and it
is likely to remain in the closet because the true history of AIDS is so incriminating.”

“Cantwell further made the substantial point that the extremely high statistical correlation
between the locations of vaccinations in both Africa and the US and the locations of
outbreaks of HIV, were dismissed entirely by the media and US authorities as “insufficient
evidence” and perhaps a minor “contamination problem”, whereas a questionable test
on a dried-up blood sample taken from an unknown person in the Congo in 1959
constituted “absolute proof” that human HIV existed prior to the US military’s research.
Another medical researcher, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, has advanced essentially the same
theory of the true origin of HIV in two books he has written that question the accidental
appearance of both HIV and Ebola.

241
11.8. The WHO

Geneva, Switzerland. Source

To further our conspiracy theory, what would it take to convince us that the WHO
was not only an interested partner in the development of HIV but knowingly
distributed hundreds of millions of vaccine doses that were contaminated with
HIV and was responsible for the rapid spread of HIV in Africa? What kind of
evidence would we want? Would it help if we had documentation of the WHO’s declared
interest in developing an HIV virus, and overwhelming circumstantial evidence that the
distribution of AIDS in Africa closely matched various WHO vaccination
campaigns? Again, fortunately for us, this is precisely what we have.

It is important to our story that it wasn’t only the US military that was interested in the
potential of an immuno-deficient retro-virus. Another criminal conspirator, the UN’s World
Health Organisation –the WHO – also exhibited a drooling fascination with the
possibilities, perhaps as a population control measure. From the WHO, we have the
following: “An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective
effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune
response to the virus itself may be impaired if the inflicting virus damages, more
or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus.”[36][37]

This is certainly a clear reference to an HIV-type pathogen, and we need to ask

ourselves why the WHO would have such an interest in viruses designed to kill
the human immune system.
242
 As Dr. Alan Cantwell noted, this was a rather “diabolical experiment” for the WHO
to conceive:

“The [UN] report indicates that infection with certain retroviruses could result in “selective
damage” to the immune system, particularly to white blood cells known as “T-cells”. This
immune system damage could also lead to cancer. The WHO recommended a
“systematic evaluation” of these immunosuppressive retroviruses. Part Two of the
memorandum reviews the results of previous animal experiments which have “serious
implications for human disease and clinical research”. In the same year (1972) a
document published in the Federation Proceedings proposed the further study of
bacterial and virus “antigens” that selectively kill T-cells in the blood. The scientific
committee “visualized” human vaccination experiments conducted on [siblings] “during
preventive vaccination”. In plainer English, the word … refers to children of the same
family; “during preventive vaccination” means children would be covertly given
“experimental” infectious agents (i.e., “bacterial and viral antigens”) at the time
of routine vaccinations. The WHO officials stressed the need for the proper
“choice of an appropriate control population”. Within a few years of these
suggested experiments, a new and mysterious immunosuppressive disease
began killing millions of African Blacks.”

If this isn’t clear, the WHO was recommending the development of a retrovirus, HIV or
similar, that would kill the human immune system, then to test it on “an appropriate
control population” (i.e., poor blacks) during routine vaccination programs. Absent
from these reports is any mention that these experiments would be done with
either the knowledge or the consent of those vaccinated.

Life expectancy in South Africa is no more than 45 years. Many people do not see or know their
grandparents. Source

243
Dr. William Campbell Douglass wrote a well-known report titled “W. H .O. Murdered
Africa“. [38] In that report, he states that HIV was finally produced (genetically
engineered) in 1974, after having been predicted and requested. He states that the AIDS
virus distribution by the WHO, was not just a diabolical scientific exercise that
got out of hand; it was a cold-blooded successful attempt to create a killer virus
which was then used in a successful experiment in Africa. African AIDS was the
result of the smallpox eradication vaccine program conducted by the World Health
Organization during the 1970s. It was not an accident. It was deliberate!

11.9. The WHO Vaccination Programs

In 1975, a man named Nathan Gordon, who had been Chief of the CIA’s Chemistry
Branch, testified before a US Congressional Committee on the “Unauthorized
Stockpiling of Toxic Agents”, and stated that in his view the only certain method of
killing large numbers of people would be to vaccinate them, to “put some of them
in one long line and inoculate each and every one”. Here is some of his
testimony: [39] Africa was the center of several ambitious campaigns to rid that part of
the world of various diseases. Two of these campaigns which are of interest include
massive polio vaccination in the 1950s and 1960s, and a similar one for smallpox
that began in the late 1970s and ended in the late 1980s. More than 20 African
nations were included, but the vaccination programs were also conducted in South
America and other areas, all under the jurisdiction and planning of the WHO but
included participation and support from USAID, the CDC, the NCI and, of course,
from Merck who manufactured the vaccines. Records indicate that in the early years
of the program, 200 to 250 million doses of vaccine were administered annually,
and that these same nations participating in the WHO’s vaccination campaigns
were almost exclusively those experiencing the massive outbreaks of HIV. Brazil,
the only South American country covered in the eradication campaign, had the
highest incidence of Aids in that region.

In South Africa, the number of people living with AIDS and HIV has increased by almost 4 million in
17 years. Source

244
It is not for nothing that many prominent scientific groups, scientists, and
researchers have independently concluded that HIV was deliberately created in a
US military lab as a biological weapon and a tool of population control.

Kenyan ecologist Wangari Maathai, the first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize,
made an outright claim that the AIDS virus was a deliberately created biological agent. The
UK Guardian seemed to agree with her. [40]There is a great deal of history and detail
attached to this topic but, for the cynics, the most startling circumstantial proof of not only
the military development of the AIDS virus but of its almost-certainly deliberate release
into the world, emerged from the activity of the WHO.

The WHO were conducting large-scale smallpox vaccination programs in Africa

and South America, these activities highly correlated with the places and times
when the HIV virus emerged in the populations. The concern is that one such occasion
would be a coincidence, but this would be neither the first nor the last time the WHO
would be implicated in a deliberate outbreak of disease and epidemics.

The London Times linked these WHO vaccine programs to the outbreak of AIDS,
claiming the AIDS epidemics were likely “triggered by the mass vaccination
campaign”. It was a WHO advisor who disclosed the linkage. In an article on May 11,
1987, the London Times[41][42][43] confirmed the linkage of the WHO vaccines to the
outbreak of AIDS, writing that “The Aids epidemic may have been triggered by the
[WHO] mass [smallpox] vaccination campaign.”

The impetus for the article was an adviser to the WHO, who disclosed the correlation
between the vaccination locations and the outbreaks of HIV. The Times quoted him
as saying:

“I thought it was just a coincidence until we studied the latest findings about the
reactions which can be caused by vaccinia. Now I believe the smallpox vaccine theory
is the explanation to the explosion of Aids. The greatest spread of HIV infection
coincides with the most intense [WHO] immunization programmes”

Immediately after this Smallpox-HIV vaccine story appeared on the front-page of

The London Times, it was killed and never appeared again in any of the world
major media.

245
11.10. Spread of AIDS in the US

ACT UP members march in the Gay Pride Parade, New York, June 1989. Source

The same was true in the US where HIV exploded suddenly in the precise locations
where the military and the CDC conducted their experimental Hepatitis B
vaccination program. Let’s look at some of the details.

In 1978, the US military, fronted by the CDC, began what it called “experimental
Hepatitis B vaccine trials” in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. The
advertisements for participants in these trials, specifically requested only
homosexual men who were “not monogamous”, and only sexually “promiscuous
males between the ages of 20 and 40”. The participants were all white, well-educated
and perfectly healthy but, as Dr. Alan Cantwell wrote, “As soon as homosexuals signed
up as guinea pigs for the government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments,
they began to die with a strange virus of unknown origin.

The hepatitis B experiments began in Manhattan in the fall of 1978; the first few
cases of AIDS (all young gays from Manhattan) were reported to the CDC in 1979.
My research clearly supports the outbreak of AIDS cases in Los Angeles and San Francisco
shortly after the experiment began in those cities. Not surprisingly, the government
has refused to release data on the number of AIDS deaths that have occurred in
the large group of gay men who initially volunteered for the vaccine experiment.”
246
“It appears that hesitant, small-scale trials with this “experimental Hepatitis
vaccine” were begun in 1970 and lasted for about four years, but the US military refuses
to disclose where these trials were conducted or to provide information about the number
of participants. And in 1974, Saul Krugman published statements from Dr. Maurice R.
Hilleman that “4 lots of [experimental hepatitis B] vaccine”, approximately
200,000 doses, were ready for “initial limited clinical tests“, begging the
important question of who were to be the 200,000 victims of a “limited initial”
test. Again, the authorities have stonewalled all investigations into these human
experiments, refusing to release any documentation on the makeup of the vaccine
or the fate of all those unwitting victims.”

And it was yet another two years later, in 1976, that “Phase I and II” of the administration
of this experimental hepatitis B vaccine were conducted on homosexual men in New York
City, by the above-referenced Saul Krugman and his colleagues, the results of which
apparently led to the widespread full-blown campaign in 1978. The later trials in New York
City were apparently under the direction of a Dr. Wolf Szmuness, involving some 1,100
gay men. In any case, shortly after the initiation of these experimental trials, the
first cases of HIV were confirmed in homosexual men in the three cities and the
precise locations where the Hepatitis B vaccine was administered.

Dr. Cantwell says there is no question that HIV was introduced into the homosexual
communities via the Hepatitis vaccine “experiment”. And, given the circumstances and
extraordinary secrecy surrounding all of this, and the fact that it was entirely a military
endeavor, that “introduction” of HIV was unlikely to have been accidental. It seems
especially incriminating that the US military and the entire US government apparatus
have refused for more than 40 years to disclose the data on the thousands of gay
men subjected to the so-called Hepatitis vaccine, and the numbers of those who
contracted HIV.

There were many articles in the popular media and in respected medical journals that were
desperately (I would say ‘too desperately’) devoted to creating an official
narrative “proving” that HIV originated with monkeys in Africa and that its rapid
and widespread transmission throughout Africa and transfer to other countries
and continents was simply an accident of fate. Numerous researchers and
commentators, many of dubious credentials, claimed HIV “probably” originated in the
1940s, and many repeated a claim (since proved false) that proof was found in 1959 of
man dying of HIV, his blood samples having been conveniently preserved for 50 years in a
hut in Africa. One of the main difficulties was in accounting for the species jump from
primates to humans, but the wordsmiths at the CIA were nothing if not creative.

One of my favorite stories, heavily promulgated by CNN and much of the Western
media, attributed the transfer of HIV (from African primates to North American
whites) to a homosexual Air Canada flight attendant named Gaëtan Dugas, who
has been catalogued by AIDS researchers as “patient zero”. The story is that Dugas
was on a “long layover” in Africa and apparently spent all his free time having sex with
247
monkeys, thereby contracting the HIV virus and bringing it to North America. There was
no mention of Dugas infecting anyone in his home town of Montreal, but CNN told us “The
Canadian flight attendant was linked sexually to dozens of the first AIDS cases
identified among gay men in the United States.”

If true, that would constitute promiscuity with a capital “P”, but for many reasons the tale
is on the cusp of unbelievable and impossible. First, if the story were true and the man
were real, and he was as promiscuous as we are told, he would almost certainly have
infected half of Montreal before reaching San Francisco and New York. For another,
for the man to be personally linked to dozens of the first HIV cases, would indicate a single
source which the facts clearly refute. Also, since even CNN admitted Dugas was by no
means linked to all initial HIV cases, there had to be another source or sources. As well,
nobody promulgating this tale cared to deal with the virtual impossibility of the species
jump and consequent mutations of such a virus necessary to infect humans. However, after
more sane people brought the facts to light, even Wikipedia has admitted the claims
against Dugas were false, [44] while CNN now purports to tell us “The truth about
‘patient zero’ and HIV’s origins” [45] and Canada’s CBC claims the man has been
“exonerated”. [46] But in any case, to suggest a man would want to run around Africa
having sex with monkeys is merely stupid, though the potential risk might form a
cautionary tale for sheep ranchers in Australia.

As well, many publications produced a version of “Scientists have pinpointed what is

believed to be the earliest known case of AIDS …”, all differing in facts and details, but all
attempting to prove the virus crossed from African monkeys to humans of its own accord.
Another CNN version told us that “Researchers at the University of Alabama report
they have traced the source of HIV to a type of chimpanzee in West Central
Africa.” Some imaginative British researchers even discovered a sailor from Manchester
who also died in 1959 and whose blood samples – also conveniently preserved for 50 years
– proved that he died of HIV. Unfortunately, it was quickly discovered that his supposed
blood sample had been only recently contaminated with HIV, either accidentally or
deliberately. Nevertheless, all these stories, and there were many, were claimed by
authorities to definitively refute the various “conspiracy theories” about the origin of HIV.

Dr. Alan Cantwell related the story of Dr. David Heymann, who was the Executive
Director of the WHO’s Communicable Disease Program and who, in a 1992 interview
on the topic of HIV having been spread through contaminated experimental polio vaccines,
was quoted as having said, “The origin of the AIDS virus is of no importance to
science today. Any speculation on how it arose is of no importance.” Dr. Cantwell
asked how this could possibly not be of vast importance when it might suggest a
deliberate mass culling of human populations and genocide. For a man in Dr.
Heymann’s position to make such a statement borders on being bizarre, and with
the strong smell of a man saying, “Don’t go there.” As a point of interest, Heymann,
“led the WHO’s global response to the SARS epidemic.” [47] I don’t find that
comforting. And the Rothschild’s Chatham House calls Heymann “a distinguished
fellow” and “one of our people”. [48] I find that even less comforting.

248
Cantwell added further that:

“Government health agencies have little interest in uncovering possible man-made origins
of any emerging disease because such an investigation could compromise covert biowarfare
activities. The WHO is no exception. In reality, the WHO (according to its own mission
statement) “cooperates” with government agencies like the US Department of
Defense, which funds the US biological warfare program. It is easy to understand
why researchers might want to obscure the man-made origin for AIDS and blame
primates. It is now apparent that most of the major researchers promoting the
African primate origin of AIDS were connected with the largely secret Special
Virus Cancer Program, or are scientists involved in the transfer of viruses in animal
research, particularly primate research.”

I would add that the Western media and a great many writers and columnists, to
say nothing of a virtual flood of pseudo-scientists, made an immense effort to
bury the average reader in an avalanche of irrelevancies and trivia, listing all the
kinds of monkeys or primates that might have been involved, all the possible transmission
media imaginable, interminable if questionable genetic “facts” and theories, sufficient to
render it almost impossible to focus on the core issues. One of those issues of course is
the simultaneous emergence of HIV in Africa, North America, and South America,
with North America experiencing simultaneity in New York, Los Angeles, and San
Francisco and that of Africa in more than 20 nations.

I will repeat here an extract from the Chapters on Biological Weapons, where Leonard
Horowitz and Zygmunt Dembek identified some signs of a bio-warfare agent:

Disease caused by an uncommon agent, with lack of an epidemiological

explanation. i.e. no clear idea of source.

An unusual, rare, (probably) genetically engineered strain of an agent.

Unusual manifestation and/or geographic distribution.

Multiple epidemics. If simultaneous epidemics occur at different locations with

the same organism, it is highly suspect.

And again, recent disease outbreaks that would seem to properly qualify as potential bio-
warfare agents are AIDS, SARS, MERS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Hantavirus, Lyme Disease,
West Nile Virus, Ebola, Polio (Syria), Foot and Mouth Disease, the Gulf War Syndrome and
ZIKA.

And in fact thousands of prominent scientists, physicians, virologists and

epidemiologists on many continents have concurred that all these viruses were
lab-created and their release deliberate.
249
In March of 1996, Scientific American published an article titled, “The African AIDS
Epidemic”, in which they stated “One frequently mentioned explanation for the severe
epidemic in the AIDS belt is that the virus originated here and continues to move outward
from an epicenter of disease. But AIDS cases appeared in hospitals in Uganda and
Rwanda at the same time they did in the West, and no stored human-tissue samples
taken from Africans during the 1970s are HIV-positive.” A further issue, which the article
also addressed, was that “HIV in Africa was entirely a heterosexual disease,
affecting everyone equally. Prior to 1978, there was no sign of the AIDS virus, yet
it struck [only] the US gay community with a vengeance.” None of the articles
adhering to the standard monkey narrative were able to satisfactorily explain
these latter points, and indeed for such simultaneous events to occur in places so far
distant, and to infect very different kinds of individuals, would of necessity suggest
deliberation and planning rather than randomness.

“The most common theory that appears to explain the outbreaks of HIV in Africa relates to
vaccine contamination, which has been a persistent concern almost since the beginning of
the process. Today, many vaccines are prepared from common bases, all of which appear
to contain contaminants and which have managed in turn to contaminate the entire blood
supply of the Western world and, according to virologists, have altered human DNA in ways
not understood.” I have mentioned elsewhere that a common monkey virus, SV40, found
its way into the US blood supply and into the national vaccine base, and that more than
100 million Americans were infected with SV40, the eventual results being still unknown
but probably including increased rates of cancer.

Perhaps the most important issue is that it was the WHO’s smallpox vaccination
campaigns in the 1970s and 1980 that appear to have triggered the vast
outbreaks of HIV. The relationship between the WHO smallpox campaigns and
the sudden appearance of HIV appears irrefutable, simply from the coincidence
of location as revealed in the London Times article, where it appears evident
that every place subjected to smallpox vaccines also quickly developed an HIV
epidemic. The questions then revolved around the content of these later vaccines and
whether the HIV infections were accidental or deliberate. This portion of the debate rages
on even today, with strong convictions on both sides of the argument.

The portion of the argument made by the prosecution against the WHO that claims the use
of infected vaccines is probably very strong and is supported by a great deal of practical
and circumstantial evidence. The second portion of the argument, the ‘conspiracy’
part, that proposes deliberate intent on the part of the WHO to infect populations
with a pathogen is the one creating all the heat. It would be easier to dismiss the
conspiracy portion of this theory if there were not such an abundance of evidence that the
WHO really is a criminal organisation dedicated to world population reduction and the sales
of billions of doses of vaccines manufactured by its masters. Even a quick glance at the
historical record will indicate a surprising correlation between most, or even all,
of the WHO vaccination campaigns and the outbreak of yet another disease
epidemic. As with most other kinds of repeated events, one is unfortunate, two is
bad luck, three might be carelessness, but twenty-five is a plan. Even worse, the

250
WHO has been caught in circumstances of astonishing deceit and enormous
criminal intent in some of its vaccination programs, as you have already seen, the
massive sterilization campaign masked as tetanus vaccinations being one
example.

On June 5, 1981, the CDC published the first documentation of AIDS. Source

It is this weight of evidence that bears so heavily on the HIV epidemics. And of course, the
outbreaks of HIV in the US correlated almost perfectly with the Hepatitis B
vaccination campaigns conducted by the NHS. When you launch a Hepatitis
vaccination campaign involving thousands of healthy homosexual men and most of those
are quickly discovered to have contracted HIV, simple denials are insufficient and,
when the official story clearly does not make sense and does not serve to explain
the phenomena we witness, our instinctive conclusion is that someone is lying to
us.That conclusion becomes conviction when the authorities adamantly refuse to
release details of the vaccination campaigns.

And, just as with the WHO, the authorities, the pharma companies, and vaccine makers,
have been caught lying to us too many times in the past for us to accept their stories this
time. This is where the matter rests today, with a great many people deeply suspicious of
both the WHO and the health authorities. And of course, it is of no help that the volume
of evidence appears to strongly support the theory that HIV was indeed created
by the US military as a biological weapon, and also that active population
reduction has in fact for many decades now been one of the pillars of existence
of some very influential institutions, the Rockefeller group and various UN segments
including our favorite WHO among these, and including our perhaps too-active
philanthropist Bill Gates and his Foundation. Given all the factual and circumstantial

251
evidence, it is not at all difficult to imagine the deliberate creation and dispersal
of lethal pathogens by those who believe the world is theirs to control.

11.10 . Epilogue

…and logic would seem to indicate that the planning for all these travesties emanates
from The City of London.

I have not conclusively proven the thesis proposed at the beginning of this article. We have
voluminous (and powerful) circumstantial evidence, but the remainder lies in the sphere of
conjecture and hypothesis. The facts presented are still facts, and they definitely
justify suspicion, but they are not of themselves proof of the US government and
military involved in a massive conspiracy with the WHO, and all orchestrated by
the European Khazar mafia in The City of London. Nevertheless, this essay may
provide food for thought and perhaps provoke other minds to contribute to the process. The
object is to uncover and document the whole truth, whatever that might be. And
perhaps a caution to avoid both the WHO and vaccines.

It may not be so difficult for us to concede that the US government and

military have indeed done all the evil deeds these articles have exposed, but it
may be more difficult for us to accept that the United Nations and its various
organisations like the WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the IMF, the World Bank, and many
more, are all cut from the same cloth. And yet the evidence is irrefutable.

252
Surprising as it may seem, Robert McNamara‘s efforts described earlier, were
merely one small part of an American program of human experimentation,
torture, sterilisation and much more, an overall program staggering in its
enormity, its depravity, and its callous disregard for human life. The CIA’s MK-
ULTRA program was almost infinitely larger than MacNamara’s programs. I
discussed it in detail in an earlier essay which you can access here. [49] I also provided
summaries of some of the fiendish human experimentation conducted by the US
authorities over decades, in an earlier essay titled “The Dark Side of America:
Human Experimentation”. You can access it here. [50]

The Wall Street Journal published an article titled “Poisoner in Chief” on Sidney
Gottlieb, the mastermind behind MK-ULTRA[51], and the New York Times published an
article where William Colby of the CIA describes the CIA’s “poison work”, [52] and
the NYT also published an article on a Congressional Hearing where Senators were informed
(as one example) of how the CIA prepared a poison to kill Patrice Lumumba, the
Congolese Prime Minister who was becoming troublesome to the US. [53] All of
these, and very much more, are pieces of a gigantic worldwide network of atrocities.

And, surprising as it may seem, those activities above form only a small part of the entire
worldwide picture of planned travesties that include human experimentation, torture,
sterilisation, biological warfare, impoverishment, and depopulation. The US may be the
largest and most visible participant in this picture, but Americans are by no means
the only players in this game, and logic would seem to indicate that the planning
for all these travesties emanates from The City of London. Nothing is what it appears
to be. These groups are criminal organisations following an agenda that is in no
way in the best interest of the peoples of the world.

253
NOTES

[1] Department of Defense – Congressional Testimony On AIDS

https://www.scribd.com/document/546230770/Department-of-Defense-Congressional-Testimony-
on-AIDS

[3] From the Official U.S. Govt. Documents House of Rep. Department of Defense Appropriations for
1970; H.B. 15090
https://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/AIDS3.html

[4] The US Government Declares War on America

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10750/

[5] The US in Korea

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/11684/

[6] Robert McNamara’s Infamous “Project 100,000” and the Vietnam War
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/robert-mcnamaras-infamous-project-100000-and-
the-vietnam-war-a-premeditated-crime-against-humanity-october-30-2019/

[7] The US in Vietnam

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/12126/

[8] The US Government Declares War on America

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10750/

[9] The US Government Declares War on America — Part 2 — Biological Warfare

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10791/

[10] The US Government Declares War on America — Part 3 – The US Declares War on its own
Military
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/10806/

[11] John F. Kennedy Presidential Library; NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDA [NSAM]:
NSAM 235,
https://www.jfklibrary.org/asset-viewer/archives/JFKNSF/340/JFKNSF-340-023

[12] National Security Action Memorandum 235

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Action_Memorandum_235

254
[13] Memo PPS23 by George Kennan
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Memo_PPS23_by_George_Kennan

[14] Science: Better than the Bomb

https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,797850,00.html

[15] BioWarfare: Mycoplasma – The Linking Pathogen in Neurosystemic Diseases

https://www.sott.net/article/155150-BioWarfare-Mycoplasma-The-Linking-Pathogen-in-
Neurosystemic-Diseases

[16] Common Mycoplasmas – Now Weaponized, Pathogenic & Deadly; By Donald W. Scott, MA, MSc
© 2001
https://rense.com/general18/mcc.htm

[17] Gentleman spy : the life of Allen Dulles

https://archive.org/details/gentlemanspylife00gros

[18] David Baltimore

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Baltimore

[19] Litton to Run Cancer Research Lab

https://www.nytimes.com/1972/06/25/archives/litton-to-run-cancer-research-lab.html

[20] INVESTIGATOR PASSES ON COMPELLING MEMORANDUM

https://ia601803.us.archive.org/2/items/umoja-research/AIDS/AIDS%20-
%20Robert%20Strecker%20Memorial%20%C2%B7%20Medical%20Veritas%20Inc..pdf

[21] IS AIDS MAN MADE?

http://files.righto.com/theories/strecker.html

[22] The Story of Robert Strecker

https://ia803207.us.archive.org/34/items/dr.-strecker/Truth%20About%20AIDS.pdf

[23] A Chapter Summary of ‘Emerging Viruses’ for Reporters; Overview Reconciling the origin of AIDS
and Ebola
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0243.080?rgn=main;view=fulltext

[24] AIDS and Ebola – Where Did They Really Come From? by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/supressed_inventions/suppressed_inventions06.htm

[25] Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola

https://archive.org/details/emergingvirusesa00horo

[26] The CIA and the West Nile Virus

http://whale.to/v/nile.html

[27] Jakob Segal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakob_Segal

[27a] A higher form of killing : the secret story of chemical and biological warfare
https://archive.org/details/higherformofkill00harr

[28] Michael Morrissey: Was There an AIDS Contract?

https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Urgent_Action/AIDS_Contract.html

[29] New WHO report on Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 highlights strategies for its prevention
and control
https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-2021-new-who-report-on-human-t-lymphotropic-virus-type-
1-indicates-the-future-path-for-its-prevention-and-control
255
[30] Dr. Boyd Graves’ Research and Flowchart Proof of Intentional Development of a Virus that Kills.
http://www.balaams-ass.com/piano/theworld/graves.htm

[31] Queer blood : the secret AIDS genocide plot

https://archive.org/details/queerblood00alan

[32] Dr. Alan Cantwell – AIDS and the Doctors of Death

https://archive.org/details/aidsdoctorsofdea00cant

[33] Dr. Alan Cantwell – AIDS and the Doctors of Death – Part 1
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=Dr.%20Alan%20Cantwell%20a%20%22diab
olical%20experiment%22%20for%20the%20WHO%20&mid=B53932DE829A4BB06F35B53932DE8
29A4BB06F35&ajaxhist=0

[34] Dr. Alan Cantwell – AIDS and the Doctors of Death – Part 2
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=Dr.%20Alan%20Cantwell%20a%20%22diab
olical%20experiment%22%20for%20the%20WHO%20&mid=70EF6495D713C486D23270EF6495D71
3C486D232&ajaxhist=0

[35] Alan Cantwell On The Origin Of AIDS

https://rense.com/general74/cantww.htm

[36] WHO 1972 Bulletin, volume 47, page 251; Virus-associated immunopathology: animal models
https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/263567

[37] WHO Bulletin; Volume 46(2); 1972

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/issues/169475/

[38] Dr. William Campbell Douglass “W. H .O. Murdered Africa”

https://archive.org/details/dr.-willam-c-douglass/W.H.O.%20Murdered%20Africa.pdf

[39] Testimony of Nathan Gordon, former chief, Chemistry Branch, Technical Services Division, CIA
https://ia803205.us.archive.org/34/items/Church-Committee-Hearings-Volume1-Toxic-Agents/Vol1-
ToxicAgents.pdf (from the bottom of page 54 till page 96)

[40] How Aids was unleashed upon Africa

https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2000/jul/09/focus.news

[41] London Times; Edition 1 MON 11 MAY 1987; Smallpox vaccine ‘triggered Aids virus’; BY PEARCE
WRIGHT, SCIENCE EDITOR
https://www.wanttoknow.info/870511vaccineaids

[42] 1987, the London Times – AIDS epidemics caused by WHO vaccinations
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/botched-vaccinations-blamed-for-aids-in-africa-j7vd72z0689

[43] 1987: WHO Admits Its Smallpox Vaccine Caused AIDS – WHO Omits That It Requested The
Virus
https://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/11/1987-who-admits-smallpox-vaccine-caused-aids-
who-omits-that-it-requested-it.html

[44] Gaëtan Dugas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ga%C3%ABtan_Dugas

[45] The truth about ‘patient zero’ and HIV’s origins

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/27/health/hiv-gaetan-dugas-patient-zero/index.html

[46] Killing Patient Zero: How a Quebec flight attendant was falsely accused of bringing AIDS to
America

256
https://www.cbc.ca/arts/killing-patient-zero-how-a-quebec-flight-attendant-was-falsely-accused-of-
bringing-aids-to-america-1.5224906

[47] David Heymann

https://www.ted.com/speakers/david_heymann

[48] Professor David Heymann

https://www.chathamhouse.org/about-us/our-people/david-heymann

[49] CIA Project MK-ULTRA Updated

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/7928/

[50] The Dark Side of America: Human Experimentation

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/12769/

[51] ‘Poisoner in Chief’ Review: Chemistry Lessons

https://www.wsj.com/articles/poisoner-in-chief-review-chemistry-lessons-11569538888

[52] COLBY DESCRIBES C.I.A. POISON WORK

https://www.nytimes.com/1975/09/17/archives/colby-describes-cia-poison-work-he-tells-senate-
panel-of-secret.html

[53] Senators Hear C.I.A. Sent A Poison to Kill Lumumba

https://www.nytimes.com/1975/09/16/archives/senators-hear-cia-sent-a-poison-to-kill-lumumba-
panel-told-cia-sent.html

257
In November of 2002, Hong Kong experienced the onset of an outbreak of what is
now called SARS (1) (2), an event that appears to have some serious gaps in the logic
of the official narrative as reported in the Western media, some elements of which
seem either implausible or impossible, and with many unanswered questions as
to the phylogenesis and distribution of this virus. It appears that the first
identified case was of a farmer in Guangdong Province in Mainland China, who died
from what appeared to be an unremarkable flu-type illness, “one of the unfortunate
victims who succumb every flu season”. The farmer died soon after admittance to
hospital and, so far as I am aware, no definite diagnosis was made as to the
cause of his death. However, he has been catalogued as “patient zero”, marking
the beginnings of an epidemic of a new and contagious disease that eventually infected
over 8,000 people and killed more than 700. Of these deaths, 300 were in Hong
Kong (of a population of 7 million) and about the same number in
Mainland China (of a population of 1.4 billion). As a percentage of infections,
the death rate in Hong Kong was more than three times that of the Mainland, and
statistically SARS was a Hong Kong epidemic rather than a Chinese one.

The Chinese government was criticised at the time for failing to quickly enough
publicise the outbreak and spread of the illness, but this is irrelevant in a search for
answers. It is true that cases were initially under-reported and that perhaps
Guangdong officials wanted to contain publicity to avoid a panic but, contrary to
persistent reports in the US, the media in other nations were soon reporting that
China appeared to have over-reacted to the problem. Their claim was that Mainland
258
China had incurred less than 300 casualties in a population of 1.4 billion, but was
acting as if the losses were in the millions, and even the WHO stated that the
information provided by Mainland Chinese authorities had been “very
detailed”. There had to be more to SARS than combating a contagious
virus because, while the Chinese authorities quickly engaged in what, even in
retrospect, appears to have been an exceptionally powerful response, going so far as
to state that deliberate spreading of this infectious agent would be considered a capital
offense. (3) We don’t do that for influenza or measles.

By contrast, the Western media profusely praised Hong Kong, the BBC telling us of
Hong Kong’s marvelous “transparency in reporting the spread of the disease,
in sharp contrast to the cover-up in China”, and the South China Morning
Post was almost effervescent in telling readers that “swift moves to quarantine
at-risk residents brought the outbreak under control”. But that story was
unforgivable nonsense propagated to trash China by comparison in the eyes of the
world. In fact, the Hong Kong government, and Margaret Chan, the HK Chief Medical
Officer at the time, were heavily criticised, and even condemned, locally for their
handling of the outbreak until the matter became very serious. Even when the
Amoy Gardens residential complex became infected and its 20,000
residents had to be evacuated and quarantined, the HK government still
refused to inform the public of the severity of the situation. No one in
Hong Kong knew how or where the disease was spreading.

City officials in Hong Kong hand out free protective face masks, March 28, 2003.Christian Keenan /
Getty Image. Source

259
Local citizens became so distressed about inadequate information and legitimate fears
of an almost certain government cover-up, they created a citizens’ website named
“www.sosick.org“ (4) in which they independently detailed their own information
on the progress of SARS, especially on quarantines and new infections. This was more
than nothing. The website was quickly attracting more than 500,000 visitors per day
– from a population of about 7 million. It was the acute embarrassment from
this public action that eventually forced the Hong Kong government (and
Margaret Chan) to provide up-to-date information. (5) But the Western
media, and especially that in the US, avoided any mention of this,
deceiving their readers and slandering Mainland China without
justification.

The Western media were unanimous in claiming SARS was carried from
Mainland China to Hong Kong by one Liu Jianlun, a 64-year-old Chinese
doctor who had treated similar cases in Guangdong and who traveled to
Hong Kong to attend a wedding. He apparently stayed at the four-star Metropole
Hotel in a room on the 9th floor (Room 911, to be precise), where he infected all
the guests and visitors on his floor, who then boarded aircraft and spread
the disease to nearly 40 other countries. (1) (6) Wikipedia was so exact as to
inform us Liu infected precisely 16 hotel visitors. This claim comprises the first of our
gaps in logic, rendering much of the remaining official (Western) story implausible at
best, the tale appearing reasonable only until we stop to think about the
practical logistics.

For one thing, Hong Kong had three of what virologists call “super-spreading
events” whose explanations draw nothing rational from that standard narrative. One
of these events (or sites) was the Metropole Hotel itself. (7) (8) The SARS virus was
not spread like cold germs, where sneezing in a room might infect a dozen people. The
contagion required some extended exposure and perhaps physical
contact. None of that occurs in a hotel, where residents of a floor seldom even see
each other, much less spend time in each other’s company.

If infection transmissions were to occur in a hotel, this would almost

certainly take place in the elevators or the lobby where people might be in
close proximity for at least a period of minutes, thereby spreading the
infection to guests from every floor.

To suggest this pathogen could have emanated from one infected individual in a
corridor and passed through 16 or more closed doors to infect the guests in every room
260
on the entire floor, and ONLY guests with rooms on that floor, is absurd.
Prominent virologists claim the infections that occurred at the Metropole “cannot be
explained” by their understanding of the behavior of the SARS Coronavirus, where the
guests on one floor became infected, but nobody else except due to subsequent contact
with those floors.

While SARS was widely described as “extremely contagious” the facts of transmission
invariably paint a strangely different story. It is true that the virus was transmitted
from person to person, but the new infections were primarily either medical personnel
or family or friends visiting patients in hospitals, and those others who were in close
contact with the victims for an extended time, like sitting next to an infected
person on a long flight. While scientists confirmed that the virus could spread via
droplets, they discounted the possibility of it spreading through the air.

For the great majority of cases, which were again either medical workers
or household and other close contacts, the contagion appeared to spread
through droplets and physical contact with either the patient or with
clothing or medical equipment, perhaps drinking glasses, that had been
in contact with the patient. According to all records I have seen, apart from a few
initial infections and the large events in Hong Kong, most of the infections occurred
in this direct person-to-person manner. This pattern was true with MERS as
well, where more than 25% of all infections were among the medical
community.

Moreover, virologists and the CDC confirmed that Coronaviruses are able
to survive on environmental surfaces for a maximum of perhaps three
hours. The short life-span and need for direct contact would seem to
discount entirely the possibility of the virus spreading widely of its own
accord and surviving long enough to infect all hotel guests on one floor.

Another of these unexplained “super-spreading events” occurred at the

Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong, (9) (10) where a young man had
apparently visited a friend on the 9th floor of the Metropole Hotel and was
shortly thereafter admitted to hospital where he immediately infected
more than 100 medical staff.

There was no sensible explanation for the logistics of this occurrence. If the SARS
virus were really as aggressively contagious as this event would suggest, everyone in
the Metropole Hotel would have been infected within days, given that this location

261
was the apparent origin of all infections in and from Hong Kong, and it
would certainly have followed the same aggressive infection campaign in Mainland
China and the other 40 countries. But it didn’t.

A hospital staff member cares for a suspected SARS victim at the Tan Tock Seng hospital in
Singapore, April 14, 2003.Getty Images. Source

Also, the disease appeared to quickly spread on an international scale, appearing at

surprising speed in many parts of the world, yet Mainland China’s cases were limited
to a few provinces, with the deaths occurring in primarily only two locations
– Guangdong and Beijing. This is not the behavior of an “extremely
contagious” virus that otherwise spreads throughout a hospital or, indeed, the
world, like wildfire. The disease initially spread by travelers almost
exclusively to Beijing, Taipei, Singapore and Toronto in Canada, later
emerging to infect small numbers in other nations. About half of
Mainland China’s infections and deaths were in Beijing. Toronto, Taiwan
and Singapore experienced about 40 deaths each, with only a handful of deaths in the
rest of the world.

While SARS did spread around the world, the infections in most countries
were few and deaths almost zero. Notable also is that while the SARS virus did
spread to about 40 countries, it was almost exclusively Chinese who were
262
infected, those in Hong Kong most seriously, with some parts of Mainland
China being next. Taiwan is entirely Chinese, with Singapore composed
of Chinese in very large part. And according to my information, the infections
and deaths in Toronto affected mostly or entirely the large resident
Chinese population. The CDC noted that SARS transmission in Canada appeared
to be limited to “a well-defined population of health care workers and close contacts”,
i.e. returning Chinese travelers. The SARS virus apparently much preferred Chinese
to Caucasians, though it did attack Vietnamese health care workers (who may be
similar to Chinese in their genetic susceptibility) in both Vietnam and Canada.

Multi-zone modeling of probable SARS virus transmission by airflow between flats in Block E, Amoy
Gardens. Source

263
The third “super-spreading event“ was the Amoy Gardens residential
complex, (11) home to almost 20,000 people that experienced a massive
outbreak of more than 300 cases, and from which all residents had to be
removed from the city and placed in quarantine camps, leaving the entire
complex a ghost town. Virologists are unanimous in categorising this as
“the most spectacular event” of the entire SARS crisis. The official (Western
media) narrative tells us the virus was spread through defects in the building
complex’s drainage or sewage system, where the S-shaped traps under each of the
thousands of sinks or toilets were inexplicably drained of water, the virus then
blown into all the apartments through the now-vacant sewage pipes.
Wikipedia told us so poetically that the virus “was blown by a gentle maritime breeze”
from the toilet sewage pipes into the stairwells and thence to all the homes, but
scientists had already discounted the possibility of the virus being airborne. In any
case, such an event would be impossible for a multitude of reasons, one being
that drainage traps are refilled with water on each use and cannot
evaporate unless a home remains vacant and unused, perhaps for years.

The Amoy Gardens was not a place with empty apartments and drained plumbing,
but the narrative begs many other important questions, the first being how the
SARS virus entered the complex and got itself immersed in the plumbing
system in the first instance. The Amoy Gardens is a large complex of 30- and 40-
story apartment buildings, with one building suffering about half the infections and
the other half spread among four others. How did the SARS virus enter all those
buildings? What was the source? There was no immense open sewer full of
viruses into which a wind could blow, and how does a wind blowing up through a toilet
continue its travel into the corridors and stairwells? A contaminated individual
might infect his family, but not 300 families in five different buildings, and
to that point Hong Kong didn’t have enough infected individuals to contaminate the
entirety of five high-rise buildings. One version was that an infected patient
discharged from the Prince of Wales Hospital visited a relative in one of the buildings,
bringing the contamination there, but those claims were undocumented and
unsubstantiated, becoming increasingly implausible as one examined the precise
facts.

Another is the means of locomotion. If a virus is indeed resting in an

outdoor sewer somewhere, what is the source of the powerful air currents
that would be required to blow it upward throughout the plumbing
system of a 40-story apartment complex and enter most or all
apartments? There are no air currents blowing upwards through our toilets and
sinks, and gravity serves to wash the pipes’ contents down and out of the building, not
inward and upward. For another matter, an enormous amount of SARS virus would
be necessary, as well as a very powerful magical fan, to blow a sufficient amount of
contagion upward through all the drainage pipes and stairwells to reach and
contaminate most apartments in a 40-story building. And what would be the
264
source of the required enormous volume of contagion? We would need
hundreds of liters of the SARS virus gathering at the (non-existent) sewer entrances
of each building, waiting for Wikipedia’s gentle “maritime breeze” to blow them
upwards into all the apartments. The virus resides in people and dies quickly
without a host.

I am not a plumber, but a “defective sewage system” in a high-end high-

rise apartment building does not seem to possess the claimed
qualifications to distribute lethal pathogens to all apartments. In any case,
aside from the initial – and unsubstantiated – claim, there were no reports either
before or after the outbreak to suggest any plumbing defects ever existed, and I was
personally told no changes or maintenance of any kind were performed
later. Once again, to a casual reader the story sounds plausible until we stop to think
about the practical logistics. After all, sewage and drainage pipes are no doubt
dirty places which make a happy home for germs of all kinds, but those
germs are there because we put them there each time we dispose of
waste. They don’t enter a building and seek out the drainage pipes of their
own accord, then run around independently like mice looking for a place
to hide, and lurking until victims approach. Nor do they spread
throughout a building and intentionally enter each home. By whatever
method the virus entered the Amoy Gardens and spread throughout the buildings to
infect hundreds of individuals, the official story is unlikely to be correct.

In short, the narrative of the progress of the SARS virus from Guangdong to Hong
Kong and from there by travelers to other nations appears credible, but support
appears to be lacking for other critical portions of the official story, most especially
the origin of the virus itself, and its transmission in the hotels, hospitals
and building complexes in Hong Kong. Another area with more questions
than answers is the contagious aspect of the virus, in part its apparent
race selectivity, but also its inexplicably aggressive progress in some
circumstances like the Prince of Wales Hospital where it almost immediately
infected more than 100 people, or its progress in the Amoy apartment buildings where
it quickly infected hundreds, and yet its comparatively selective and almost benign
behavior in the Metropole Hotel teeming with travelers where it
apparently chose to confine itself to one floor and infect only a handful of
people in their rooms instead of lurking in the elevators and lobby that
contained hundreds of easily available victims.

SARS was proven to be caused by a strain of the coronavirus, a large family

of mostly harmless viruses also responsible for the common cold. Various research
studies discovered a similar strain residing in bats, which have been categorised as a
kind of warehouse for the virus, with the Western media flogging the

265
undocumented theory that the virus spread from the bats to civets which
were then handled and eaten and thus communicated the disease to
humans. However, neither the bats nor the civets displayed any sign or
symptoms of infection. The Chinese CDC led an investigation that apparently
discovered genetic links between the virus strains found in the animals and in
humans. This would almost force a conclusion that the virus jumped not only one but
two species barriers, but virologists tell us that Coronaviruses do not naturally jump
species barriers, and that jumping two barriers would be a rare occurrence indeed.
Another immediate problem with the theory is that civets had been handled and
eaten in Guangdong for decades prior to the SARS outbreak, and have been
handled and eaten subsequent to the outbreak, all with no effect. This doesn’t mean
the epidemic couldn’t have occurred this way, but it does mean the simple explanation
is not sufficient.

Dr. Alan Cantwell

A more serious problem is that the SARS virus exhibited characteristics never
before observed in any animal or human virus, did not by any means fully
match the animal viruses mentioned above, and contained genetic material that still
remains unidentified. Virologist Dr. Alan Cantwell (12) (13) (14) wrote that “the
mysterious SARS virus is a new virus never before seen by virologists. The …
contagious disease spread by droplets from coughing, is an entirely new
illness with devastating effects on the immune system, and there is no
known treatment.”

266
Dr. Cantwell also noted that the genetic engineering of coronaviruses has
been occurring in both medical and military labs for decades. He wrote that
when he searched in PubMed for the phrase “coronavirus genetic
engineering”, he was referred to 107 scientific experiments dating back to
1987. To quote Dr. Cantwell:

“I quickly confirmed scientists have been genetically engineering animal and human
coronaviruses to make disease-producing mutant and recombinant viruses for over a
decade. No wonder WHO scientists identified the SARS/coronavirus so quickly. Never
emphasised by medical news writers is the fact that for over forty years scientists have
been “jumping species” with all sorts of animal and human viruses and creating
chimera viruses (viruses composed from viruses of two different species). This
unsupervised research produces dangerous man-made viruses, many of
which have potential as bioweapons. Certainly SARS has the hallmarks of a
bioweapon. After all, aren’t new biological warfare agents designed to produce a new
disease with a new infectious agent? As in prior military experiments, all it might take
… to spread SARS is an aerosol can or a specially designed suitcase, or a “gloved” box
(the type used by anthrax spreaders) to infect an apartment building like the Amoy
Gardens or a floor of a hotel likethe Metropole in Hong Kong, which also had a large
number of SARS cases.” The easiest way to surreptitiously spread a pathogen
in a hotel or apartment building is to don a maintenance uniform and
spray each doorknob with an aerosol can.

267
Dr. Mae-Wan Ho of the Institute for Science in Society cites a Journal of Virology
report (Feb 2000) (15) that described a method for inducing desired mutations into
coronavirus to create new viruses. “A key feature of the procedure is to make
interspecific chimera recombinant viruses. It involves replacing part of the spike
protein gene in the feline (cat) infectious peritonitis (corona) virus (FIPV) – which
causes invariably fatal infections in cats – with that of the mouse hepatitis (corona)
virus. The recombinant mFIPV will no longer infect cat cells, but will infect mouse
cells instead, and multiply rapidly in them.”

Ho continues: “Manipulating viral genomes is now routine, and it is easy to

create new viruses that jump host species in the laboratory in the course of apparently
legitimate experiments in genetic engineering. It is not even necessary to intentionally
create lethal viruses, if one so wishes. It is actually much faster and much more
effective to let random recombination and mutation take place in the test tube. Using
a technique called ‘molecular breeding’, millions of recombinants can be
generated in a matter of minutes. These can be screened for improved function
in the case of enzymes, or increased virulence, in the case of viruses and bacteria. In
other words, geneticists can now greatly speed up evolution in the
laboratory to create viruses and bacteria that never existed in all the
billions of years of evolution on earth.” (16) It wasn’t widely publicised, but Dr.
Ho called for a full investigation into the possible genetic engineering and
dissemination of the SARS virus. (17)

Dr. Julie Gerberding, then the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, speaks at a
news conference about the SARS investigation in Atlanta on April 14, 2003.John Bazemore / AP
file. Source
268
And, in a disputation of claims that the SARS virus strain in bats and civets is ‘the
same’ as that which infected humans, Dr. Julie Gerberding, Director of the US CDC
in Atlanta, Georgia, according to Cantwell, claimed that “the genetic analysis and
sequencing of SARS were not helpful in determining the origins of the
virus”. Dr. Gerberding wrote further that “Unfortunately the clues from
comparing it to the animal viruses have not given us any real leads … We
can’t say it’s a mouse virus or a pig virus, or any other animal virus,
necessarily, because it just isn’t similar enough to the known species to be
able to draw those conclusions.” Dr. Cantwell noted further that “experiments
inoculating SARS virus into chickens and pigs were unsuccessful,
indicating SARS did not originate in Chinese pigs and chickens, as
theorised.”

To quote Dr. Cantwell again: In 1995, an abstract of an experiment details the species-
mixing of mouse coronavirus with cow “mutant” (coronavirus) using these words:

“Targeted RNA recombination was used to construct mouse hepatitis [corona] virus
(MHV) mutants containing chimeric nucleocapsid (N) protein genes in which
segments of the bovine [cow] coronavirus N gene were substituted in place of their
corresponding MHV sequences. Our results demonstrate that targeted recombination
can be used to make extensive substitutions in the coronavirus genome and can
generate recombinants that could not otherwise be made between two viruses
separated by a species barrier.”

In another 1997 gene therapy experiment, scientists mixed cat, human,

and pig coronaviruses, and adapted them to human kidney cells. These are just
two examples of thousands of gene experiments found on PubMed. One can enter “rat
sialoacryoadenitis virus and genetic engineering” and be referred to 1424
experiments. The media constantly associate the SARS virus with a human
coronavirus that causes the common cold, apparently in an effort to soothe the public.
But they downplay the various coronaviruses which affect different animal and bird
species and produce a variety of serious infections and fatal illness in various species
of animals and birds. It is mostly these animal coronaviruses that have been
genetically engineered.” (18)

Almost immediately upon receiving the genome sequence,

several Russian scientists suggested a link between SARS and
biowarfare. According to Cantwell and the Washington-based Jamestown
Foundation, the Russian Interfax-AVN news service on April 3 quoted Sergei
Kolesnikov, a member of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, as saying the
propagation of the SARS virus might well have been caused by leaking a combat virus
269
grown in bacteriological weapons labs. Kolesnikov claimed that the virus of
atypical pneumonia (SARS) was a synthesis of two viruses, the natural
compound of which was impossible, that this mix could never appear in nature,
stating, “This can be done only in a laboratory.” (19) And Nikolai Filatov, the
head of Moscow’s epidemiological services, was quoted in the Gazeta daily as stating
he believed SARS was man-made because “there is no vaccine for this virus, its
make-up is unclear, it has not been very widespread and the population is
not immune to it.” (20) (21) In response, Dr. Cantwell noted that “This accusation
was never reported by the mainstream media, but brings to mind similar
accusations Russian scientists made in December 1985 when they
concluded the AIDS epidemic was caused by experiments carried out in
the USA as part of the development of new biological weapons.”

It wasn’t widely reported, but it seems the final conclusion of the Chinese biochemists
was the same, that the SARS virus was man-made. This conclusion wasn’t a secret,
but neither was it promoted to the international media since they would simply have
used the claim to heap scorn on China, dismissing this as a paranoid conspiracy
theory. The Western media totally ignored this aspect, except for ABC news who
reported that the SARS “Mystery Virus” was possibly “a Chinese bio-weapon that
accidentally escaped the laboratory”. Nice of ABC to notice, but their story, if true,
would be the first example of a nation creating and releasing a race-
specific biological weapon designed to attack exclusively itself.

In fact, scientists around the world, from Russia to South Africa to Israel,
were almost immediately speculating that SARS was a deliberately-
seeded bio-weapon. One Israeli doctor, in response to a question, stated (22), “In
my heart of hearts I believe that SARS is genetically engineered to target
Chinese (Oriental) genetic materials. You may already know that Israel has been
working on such a thing, specific to Arab genetic material. Knowing the
military-industrial-medical cartel like I do, I would not be surprised if this
isn’t a ‘test market’ for something more sinister regarding other
populations.”

In a thesis on Biological Weapons, Leonard Horowitz and Zygmunt

Dembek stated that one clear sign of a genetically-engineered bio-warfare agent was
a disease caused by an uncommon (unusual, rare, or unique) agent, with lack of an
epidemiological explanation. I.e. no clear idea of source. They also mentioned
an “unusual manifestation and/or geographic distribution”, of which race-
specificity would be one. (23)

270
Recent disease outbreaks that would seem to possibly qualify as potential bio-
warfare agents are AIDS, SARS, MERS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, Hantavirus,
Lyme Disease, West Nile Virus, Ebola, Polio (Syria), Foot and Mouth
Disease, the Gulf War Syndrome and ZIKA. And in fact thousands of
prominent scientists, physicians, virologists and epidemiologists on
many continents have concurred that all these viruses were lab-created
and their release deliberate. The recent swine flu epidemic in China has the
hallmarks as well, with circumstantial evidence of the outbreak raising only questions.

At the same time, the Hong Kong newspaper Wenweipo published an article titled,
“Earliest SARS outbreak suspected in U.S.” (24), in which the authors wrote of AP and
Reuters reports about a 45-year-old woman who became gravely ill on Feb. 9,
2002 (nine months prior to the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong), while taking part in
her mortgage company’s annual sales convention near Philadelphia. She had the
typical SARS symptoms of headache, fever, chills, vomiting and shortness
of breath. After being hospitalized, she died early the next morning. The
entire hospital and more than 80 individuals suspected of close contact, were all
quarantined. Wenweipo believed the event had been covered up by authorities and
suggested this was actually the original occurrence of SARS, speculating the virus had
originated in a US research lab. There were also published reports that
Chinese researchers and military experts reached the same conclusions
as the Russian virologists, namely that the virus was necessarily man-
made and almost certainly originated in a US military lab and
subsequently released into China.

It is true that SARS appeared to be tightly-focused to Chinese. We might in

other circumstances pass this off as an unfortunate coincidence but for some major
circumstantial events that serve to alter our focus. One of these is the history of
American universities and NGOs having come into China in years prior to
SARS to conduct biological experiments that were so illegal as to leave the
Chinese authorities enraged. This was particularly true when it became known
that Harvard University had surreptitiously proceeded with experiments in China that
had been forbidden by the authorities years earlier, where they collected many
hundreds of thousands of Chinese DNA samples and then left the country.
(25) (26) (27) (28) (29)

The Chinese were furious to learn that Americans were collecting Chinese
DNA. The government intervened and prohibited the further export of any of the
data. The conclusion at the time was that the ‘research’ had been
commissioned by the US military with the DNA samples destined for race-
specific bio-weapons research.

271
Also, a Chinese lawyer named Tong Zeng who had participated in various
US genetic research programs in China, published a book in which he
noted that US researchers in the 1990s had collected hundreds of
thousands of samples of blood and DNA from mainland Chinese which
were all sent to the US (30) (31), and which could have been used in the
development of biological weapons. This would be one explanation for the SARS
virus being Chinese-specific.

It seems that Chinese virologists did ascertain that the SARS virus did exist, or could
exist, in civets, and indeed they were given a prize in recognition of their work. (32)
But if we are examining all possibilities, this isn’t the real issue. There are probably
thousands of viruses and other pathogens that might be usefully
employed as low-level biological weapons, and none of these are created
from whole cloth, that is to say they aren’t created from nothing. Each is
separated from a natural host and methods used to encourage it to adapt to humans.
We therefore need to ‘work backward’, to ignore initially the ‘animal reservoir’ and
focus on locating our true patient zero and determining the method by
which he was infected.That, and only that, is the crux of the matter. The
specific source animal is of little consequence to us at the initial stage. We must
determine precisely how the virus managed to infect our patient zero, and
whether it had outside assistance. This is intelligence work; the remainder is
basic science.

Nevertheless, the Western media immediately and unanimously staked

out the claim about the SARS virus having been traced to bats in China’s
Yunnan province, then worked its way to civets as the “natural reservoir”, then
infected people in a wet market, although no documentation was ever presented in
evidence of the precise transmission method of a virus jumping two species barriers.
Nevertheless no other claims or theories were permissible, and the media strenuously
avoided discussing the apparent outbreak in the US and the wide speculation that
SARS was extracted by the US military in a lab and engineered to prefer Chinese DNA.

Dr. Cantwell stated that we are repeatedly reminded about bioterrorists and
bioweapons in the most innocuous situations, yet with SARS there was not a word
about terrorists or biowarfare, that entire subject being 100% censored by the Western
media. Cantwell concluded this was “Certainly proof the media are controlled
by powerful forces that refuse to recognise what many citizens are
thinking privately, and posting on the Internet.”

My conclusion at the time was that SARS was intended for China, and it
was only an accident of fate that sent patient zero to Hong Kong to do most
272
of his damage there, leaving Mainland China with relatively small remnants to deal
with. A serious disruption of China’s economy would be one certain
motive.

I have no firm conclusions as to where this confusion of information leaves us. As I

wrote at the beginning, portions of the official story seem either implausible or
impossible, but without a clear trail in any particular direction. It is distressing
that the entire Western media ignored in total the testimony of highly-
credible Russian and Chinese scientists that the SARS virus could not
have occurred in nature but created only in a lab. This one case would not
prove a point, but there have been many of these in the past, where the US government
and military have made claims that were overwhelmingly proven false by
the Russians, yet flatly ignored by the Western media.

One such case was in Libya where the US repeatedly flooded the media
with claims that Khadaffi was waging war against his own civilians,
destroying large sections of cities with bombs and artillery and leaving
huge numbers of dead bodies everywhere. In that event, Russia
produced volumes of high-resolution satellite photos of the affected areas that clearly
displayed no damage of any kind whatever and no evidence of either battles or bodies.
Following TV reports of the American claims, the Russians produced all their
irrefutable evidence to the BBC and other Western media newswires, only to have
their evidence ignored.

This is a consistent and provable pattern which has persisted for decades: any
evidence contradicting the official (Western) narrative on any topic is
thoroughly censored. If the evidence is debatable, it is presented and
ridiculed in the media as Communist propaganda or a conspiracy theory.
If irrefutable, it is totally censored and appears no place. What then do we
do with testimony from world-class virologists who tell us SARS was a
man-made chimera, a mixture of pathogens impossible in nature and
most likely of military origin? How then do we interpret the events at the
Metropole Hotel and the Amoy Gardens in Hong Kong?

My view of this matter is that, even despite the passage of time, the entire SARS
event deserves an international forensic investigation.

273
Notes

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome
(2) http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hkedition/2012-10/10/content_15805337.htm
(3) https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dire-retribution-for-spreading-sars/
(4) https://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/26/news/in-hong-kong-even-your-friends-
keep-their-distance-close-encounters.html
(5) https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1264207
(6) http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-21680682
(7) https://www.who.int/csr/don/2003_07_04/en/
(8)https://www.msn.com/en-my/news/other/this-hotel-is-infamous-as-ground-
zero-for-a-sars-super-spreader-in-the-2003-outbreak%e2%80%94heres-what-
happened/ar-BB104h0D
(9) https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/health-
environment/article/3050029/coronavirus-hong-kong-sars-victims-and-frontline
(10) https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(03)13218-
7/fulltext
(11) https://www.info.gov.hk/info/sars/pdf/amoy_e.pdf
(12) u2.lege.net/whale.to/c/cantwell_alan.html
(13) https://medicalveritas.org/rigged-science-man-made-aids
(14) https://www.amazon.com/AIDS-Doctors-Death-Inquiry-
Epidemic/dp/0917211251

274
(15) http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/10627550
(16) https://www.i-sis.org.uk/SAGE.php
(17) [email protected]
(18) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9367365
(19) https://rense.com/general37/manmade.htm(20) The original links are no longer
active.
(21) https://rense.com/general37/bio.htm
(22) The original links are no longer active.
(23) Medical Aspects of Biological
Warfare; https://repository.netecweb.org/items/show/325
(24) The original links are no longer active. An archive search would be necessary to
locate the Wenweipo, AP and Reuters articles.
(25) The Harvard case of Xu Xiping: exploitation of the people, scientific advance, or
genetic theft? Margaret Sleeboom; Amsterdam School of Social Science Research,
University of Amsterdam and International Institute for Asian Studies, University of
Leiden, The Netherlands; Routlege; Taylor & Francis group; New Genetics and
Society, Vol. 24, No. 1, April 2005
(26) http://ahrp.org/article-30/
(27) http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-09/25/content_267233.htm
(28) https://ahrp.org/china-daily-investigation-challenges-us-genetic-experiments-
on-poor-farmers/
(29) http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-09/25/content_267233.htm
(30) The original links are no longer active.
(31) https://www.globalresearch.ca/harvard-genetic-research-team-collected-and-
transferred-china-blood-and-dna-samples-back-to-the-us/5704728
(32) http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2006-11/23/content_740511.htm

275
 Au unidentified student is checked her temperature as a precaution against MERS (Middle East
Respiratory Syndrome) at Gwanghui Elementary School in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, June 17,
2015. The death toll in South Korea’s MERS outbreak increased Tuesday even as schools reopened
and people recovered from the virus. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon). Source

In late 2012, the world experienced the onset of a new mini-epidemic from a
novel coronavirus that was named MERS (1) (2) because it supposedly originated in
the Middle East, at first infecting small numbers of people in Saudi Arabia, Jordan
and Qatar. Then England experienced a few cases where individuals apparently became
infected during trips to the Middle East.

This new virus was similar to SARS but was accused of having mutated and
developed an ability to invade human cells more efficiently and therefore kill
about 50% of those infected, compared to only about 10% for SARS. The virus
was first seen by an Egyptian virologist in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia while doing tests
on a patient with unusual symptoms, with the discovery soon after that this
‘patient zero’ and the Qatari man in the UK had been infected by viruses that were
99.5% identical. (3) There was no vaccine or treatment for the disease, and its fatality
rate reached over 40% overall.

276
 South Korea’s President Park Geun-hye postpones US visit over MERS outbreak KIM HONG-
JI/REUTERS. Source

By early 2013 there had been nearly 100 cases, mostly centered in the Middle East with
the others consisting of infected travelers to those regions (4). But two years later, by June
of 2015, almost 2,500 cases of MERS had been reported, most of these being in the Middle
East with almost the entire remainder being in Korea, apparently centered on the Gyeonggi
provincial district. A small number of cases had been reported in about 25 other countries
and, while the virus did not appear to spread easily between humans, it produced
a fatality rate in some locations of almost 50% of those infected. South Korea
eventually experienced almost 200 cases with about 40 deaths. (5) (6)

The outbreak in Korea was the largest manifestation of MERS outside the Middle
East, hitting this country quite hard. The public were of course worried and
anxious, thousands of individuals were in quarantine, thousands of schools were
closed, mostly in Seoul and surrounding Gyeonggi Province, airline flights to and
from Korea had been reduced by about 50%, and tourism and travel had been
sharply curtailed. A number of countries issued travel advisories, and Korea ordered the
screening of all inbound passengers, dealing further damage to tourism and business travel.
The effect on South Korea’s economy was quite serious, with most observers expecting the
economic damage to be in the billions. Cinemas, supermarket chains, shopping malls and
theme parks suffered huge drops in attendance and sales, as did most tourist-related
facilities including hotels and restaurants.

277
 The virus appearing to spread virulently and aggressively in a hospital environment.

According to the official narrative in the Western media, South Korea’s infections were
apparently all traced to a patient zero who developed MERS after returning from
a trip to the Middle East and who came into contact with others before being
diagnosed. All subsequent infections occurred in Korea’s health facilities, the virus
appearing to spread virulently and aggressively in a hospital environment, much
the same as the SARS virus did in the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong, where
one patient immediately infected more than 100 medical staff. Apparently about 50% of
those with patient contact at the Samsung Medical Centre in Seoul contracted the disease.

Margaret Chan and Keiji Fukuda. Source

278
The astonishing spread of MERS inside several Korean hospitals invoked images of Margaret
Chan stubbornly opposing hospital redesign in Hong Kong during the SARS outbreak there.
As many observers noted, “the hard-learned lessons from the SARS pandemic in
Hong Kong apparently never reached Seoul or Geneva”. WHO Assistant Director-
General Keiji Fukuda, in an attempted explanation of the virus’ rapid progress in
Korean hospitals, stated that “Infection prevention and control measures were
not optimal” in Korean hospitals, with overcrowding and patients sharing
rooms. He also mentioned the South Koreans’ habit of visiting several medical facilities
and the “Korean custom” of patients having many visitors. (7) (8) His comments may have
been true, but there was no evidence Saudi Arabia’s control measures were any more
optimal than those in Seoul, and Korea is not the only country where hospital patients have
contact with visitors or medical staff.

Oddly, the WHO appeared quite unconcerned about this new potential epidemic, specifically
stating it did not recommend the screening of passengers to or from Korea, and that no
travel restrictions should be imposed. The WHO’s Director-General, Margaret Chan,
said she believed South Korea could control the spread of the disease without
these restrictions. One would have thought that with the worldwide panic still fresh in
everyone’s mind from the SARS experience only a few years prior, they would have taken
a more cautious approach. But then the WHO wasn’t entirely cautious during the SARS
outbreak either; in Hong Kong, Margaret Chan specifically advised against taking
many precautions, including screenings, isolations and quarantines, all advice
that was later much resented because those precautions would have spared many
lives. In fact, it was Margaret Chan’s curious combination of aloofness and what
appeared to be outright incompetence that resulted in two politicians
resigning (9) (10) and her leaving Hong Kong in disgrace, only to come to rest as
head of the WHO.

While the school boards in Seoul and surrounding Gyeonggi Province announced the
extension of existing school closures and recommended the temporary closure of many
more, on June 11 of 2015 the WHO advised the country to re-open all of them, stating
that “Schools had not been linked to the transmission of the virus in Korea or
elsewhere”. The WHO also recommended again that Korea lift all travel restrictions, but
then suddenly three days later, a team of WHO “experts” surprisingly stated that “The
deadly MERS outbreak in South Korea” was “large and complex”, and that “more
cases should be anticipated”. And in fact the disease had been spreading at an
increasingly rapid pace, with 150 confirmed infections in less than one month. And
suddenly, in defiance of Margaret Chan’s “I eat chicken every day” SARS
reassurances, the WHO surprisingly stated the Korean government “should
remain vigilant” and should continue “intensified disease surveillance and
prevention measures”, praising the country for its “strong quarantine
measures”. (11) (12)

Interestingly, there was rather sparse coverage of MERS in the Middle East and
South Korea, certainly compared to SARS in Hong Kong and Mainland China, and no
mention of Saudi Arabia, South Korea, or the WHO delaying, covering up, denying

279
infections and fatality rates, while for Mainland China with SARS we were treated to
virulent China-bashing 24/7 for most of a year. Saudi Arabia was heavily criticised
internally for its flawed response (13) (14), and the doctor who reported the first
MERS patient to the government, was sworn to silence then promptly fired, which
rated little mention in the Western media. Soon after, when the outbreak became
public, the Saudi Health Minister was also fired. (15) (16)

There was some muted coverage of the virus, but no clamor for investigation of the
source, no genuine search for a patient zero, nor any puzzlement about how a never-
before-seen bat-cum-camel virus suddenly appeared, and with a strange preference
(and appetite) for residents of the Middle East. Nor could I find any studies of
genome sequencing that would have identified the various strains of MERS that
infected the Middle East and South Korea. Given the minor rates of infections and
fatalities in the rest of the world, this appeared more than curious. Also, any suggestion
(and there were suggestions) by scientists of MERS perhaps having had a human black
hand, were considered verboten by the Western media, and squashed. There were
reports of various teams, including one from Canada (17), who traveled to Saudi
Arabia to study the spread of MERS, but no discoveries were publicised. Overall,
MERS simply died a quiet death.

Researchers Scramble to Understand Camel Connection to MERS. Source

As with SARS, and with COVID-19, the Western media staked out the claim of
MERS being (in this case) a ‘camel virus’ which camels, after millennia of friendly
cohabitation with man, suddenly decided to share their virology with
humans. What is needed is an explanation of the actual source of the new virus in terms
280
of its first human infection. To my knowledge, this was never done, nor was any search for
a ‘patient zero’ ever conducted. Instead, the first victim diagnosed was designated as
patient zero and the matter dropped. This in itself is bizarre, since normally an
extensive and vigorous search is made for this individual. I have no explanation for
virologists casually identifying a ‘possible’ original animal source, then ceasing further
investigation.

Yoichi Shimatsu. Source

But there was more. I have not managed to independently confirm all of these details, but
in June of 2015 Yoichi Shimatsu wrote a quite interesting and detailed article (18)
(19) that provided a few enlightening additions to the facts of the MERS outbreak in
Korea. For one, he reiterated that, according to the Korean Yonhap News Service,
at the onset of the outbreak, 100 South Korean military personnel were
quarantined at the USAF Osan Air Base, following the MERS infection of
servicemen, indicating that this Korean soldier may well have been the actual
Patient Zero.

For those unfamiliar with the geography of South Korea, both Seoul, which
suffered the bulk of the MERS cases, and the USAF base at Osan, are both in close
proximity in Gyeonggi Province, which was also reported as the home of the
(undocumented and quite likely imaginary) “infected businessman” who traveled
to the Middle East and contracted the virus.

According to Shimatsu, the Osan base is home to the Joint US Forces-Korea Portal
and Integrated Threat Recognition advanced technology demonstration (JUPITR
ATD), a military biological surveillance program that operates its other lab facility
at Fort Detrick, MD. It is also reportedly the home of one of the US military’s bio-
weapons research labs.

281
 Jerome Kim. Source

Shimatsu also noted that the WHO sponsors the secretive International Vaccine
Institute (IVI) in Seoul, which is headed by a US military officer named Jerome
Kim who was formerly the head of the Molecular Virology and Pathogenesis
Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Rockville,
Maryland, and that sitting on the Board of Directors of this WHO-IVI chimera is a Dr.
Claudio Lanata, the science director of the US Naval “Medical Research Unit 6” in
Callao, Peru, which is a leading military center for bioweapons research. It appears
that the US military controls the WHO’s main virus laboratory . . . Shimatsu
theorised that the MERS outbreak may have been caused by a laboratory accident
at the JUPITR biowarfare project which is located very near Seoul. He also quoted
the American Forces Press Service as the source of the information that it was a
US biological warfare team that deciphered the MERS genetic code, and that this
work was supervised by the Pentagon’s top biowarfare laboratory, its Biological Defense
Research Directorate at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Certainly there have been numerous
independent suggestions that the WHO at least on occasion appears to function as an
appendage of the Pentagon.

Dr. Claudio Lanata. Source

282
In a thesis on Biological Weapons, Leonard Horowitz and Zygmunt Dembek stated that
clear signs of a genetically-engineered bio-warfare agent were (a) a disease caused by an
uncommon (unusual, rare, or unique) agent, with (b) lack of an epidemiological
explanation, i.e. no clear
idea of source; (c) An “unusual manifestation and/or geographicdistribution”, such as race-
specificity; and (d) multiple sources of infection. MERS appeared to satisfy all four
criteria. (20)

I don’t know what conclusions we draw from this assemblage of information, but it appears
at least possible there is rather more to this MERS story than the official narrative
propagated in the media. One aspect is that MERS fits all the criteria for a biological
weapon, and the fact of the explosive outbreak at the US military’s Osan Airbase
is not inconsequential. Thus, MERS also qualifies for a forensic investigation as to
the source.

283
Notes

(1) https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/ten-years-after-sars-
now-we-have-mers-8640817.html ;the original link is no longer active.

(2) https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/mar/15/coronavirus-next-global-pandemic

(3) http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/hkedition/2012-10/10/content_15805337.htm

(4) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4622265/

(5) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28153558

(6) South Korea president postpones visit to US as 2 more die from MERS; Shanghai Daily | June 11,
2015;

https://archive.shine.cn/world/SKorea-president-postpones-visit-to-US-as-2-more-die-from-
MERS/shdaily.shtml

(7) https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/asia/100000003730450/who-to-look-into-mers-in-south-
kore.html

(8) https://www.who.int/ihr/procedures/MERS_Fukuda_PC_20130705.pdf

(9) https://www.bmj.com/content/329/7458/130.2

(10) https://www.scmp.com/article/462297/dedicated-yeoh-quits-over-sars

(11) https://www.cnbc.com/2015/06/13/south-koreas-mers-outbreak-large-and-complex-who.html

(12) https://www.who.int/westernpacific/news/detail/13-06-2015-who-recommends-continuation-of-
strong-disease-control-measures-to-bring-mers-cov-outbreak-in-republic-of-korea-to-an-end

(13) http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/6/3/saudi-raises-mersdeathtollandcases.html

(14) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/world/middleeast/flawed-saudi-response-fueled-
outbreak-of-mers-middle-east-virus.html

(15) https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/amid-mers-deaths-saudi-health-minister-fired-1.2616520

284
(16) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/22/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-health-official-fired.html

(17) https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/who-team-including-canadian-investigates-how-mers-spreads-
1.1389628

(18) (Shimatsu is a free-lance journalist based in Hong Kong, a former Editor of the Japan Times Weekly
and a former Tsinghua University lecturer). https://rense.com/general96/merspenta.html

(19) https://www.21cir.com/2015/06/south-korea-mers-emerged-out-of-the-pentagons-biowarfare-
labs-2/

(20) Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare; https://repository.netecweb.org/items/show/325

285
 Health care workers wearing full body suits burn infected items at the ELWA Hospital in
Monrovia on Aug. 30, 2014. Images Dominique Faget/AFP/Getty

There was also the outbreak of the Ebola virus simultaneously in several
African countries in the middle of 2014 that at the time of writing had already
killed around 1,000 people. It was surprising to learn that the variety of Ebola that
appeared was “an especially powerful mutated strain that had no apparent
natural origin and immediately raised questions in many minds of having been
engineered.”

This caught my attention because the circumstances seemed so familiar – (a) a

sudden, inexplicable outbreak of a new, unusual, and deadly disease, (b) in
dispersed but focused locations, (c) with nobody searching for the origin, (d)
claims that the virus was primarily race-specific, affecting primarily Africans,
and (e) the WHO once again in full attendance.

286
Ebola Origin

“Ebola virus was first discovered in 1976 near the Ebola River in what is now the Democratic
Republic of Congo. Since then, the virus has been infecting people from time to time, leading
to outbreaks in several African countries. Source

In June of 2003, the Wall Street Journal ran an interesting article (1) titled, “Scientists
Search For Human Hand Behind Jungle Virus”, stating that “Some scientists are turning
their attention to a question asked all too infrequently once deadly viral outbreaks have
been contained: Where did that come from?” The article provided a long list of
mostly new diseases resulting from (probably) manufactured retroviruses like Ebola,
Hanta, HIV, HTLV-I, HTLV-II, Lassa, Mad Cow Disease, Monkey Pox, Nipah, SARS, and
West Nile Virus, as well as other curiosities like Gulf War Illness and Lyme disease,
asking, “Where did the pathogens originate?”

Several physicians wrote an article titled, “There is no natural disease called Ebola”, in
which they noted that while the main focus was on treatment, an increasing number of
people were questioning the disease’s true origin, a decreasing number of investigators
being convinced of the official story of Ebola evolving from “infected fruit bats”, and
much skepticism about how Ebola traveled 6,000 kilometers across Africa –
from the site of one US bio-weapons lab to another – without causing

287
infections in the intermediate areas. (2) (3) These physicians and virologists
insist there is no such natural disease, and believe it is a weaponised virus
created in a US military bio-lab. (4) (5) One media report, for which I have not
yet seen documentation, claims the US Department of Defense was funding
Ebola trials on humans in the weeks preceding the outbreaks in Guinea and
Sierra Leone. No word on precisely which organisation was physically conducting the
trials, but the DOD apparently had a $140 million contract with the Canadian
pharma company Tekmira to conduct Ebola research that included infusing
humans with the Ebola virus. (6) (7)

The “virus” transfers human-to-human by way of contact with an infected person’s bodily
fluids. Source

288
In an article in the UK Guardian, the US Department of Defense was named as
a collaborator in a “First in Human Ebola clinical trial” immediately before the
Ebola epidemic appeared in West. The article also noted warnings that had been
issued by top scientists from both Harvard and Yale Universities that US government
funding of such “trials” risked “triggering a worldwide pandemic”. Dr. Broderick said
“It is most disturbing that the U.S. government has been operating a viral
hemorrhagic fever bioterrorism research laboratory in Sierra Leone. Are there
others? Wherever they exist, it is time to terminate them.” And of course, Dr.
Broderick is correct in his conclusions. (8) And there are indeed many other such
bio-weapons labs around the world, prior US Congressional testimony suggesting these
number in the hundreds.

The WHO Vaccination Programs

I managed to locate some records of the WHO’s vaccination programs for the countries
in Africa where this Ebola virus erupted, and was not surprised to learn of the correlation
with WHO inoculations since there has been a perfect correlation with other similar
incidents to date. (9) (10) (11)Shimatsu noted what he calls “the strange
coincidence of the earliest breakout in Guinea with major vaccine campaigns
conducted by the WHO and UNICEF. [These involved] a cholera oral vaccine
effort by Medicins Sans Frontieres under the WHO, and UNICEF-funded
prevention programs against meningitis and polio.

289
The reason for suspecting a vaccine campaign rather than an individual carrier
is due to the fact that the Ebola contagion did not start at a single geographic
center and then spread outward along the roads. Instead, simultaneous outbreaks
of multiple cases occurred in widely separated parts of rural Guinea …”. Shimatsu wrote,
“How one of the deadliest viral strains in human history could have jumped a
distance of 4,000 kilometers undetected from Central to West Africa defies
logic.”, and I would certainly have to agree with his assessment.

He notes too that the vaccines were produced by Sanofi Pasteur, a French
pharmaceutical controlled by the Rothschilds, and others with funding from
the Gates Foundation. For the Gates-funded meningitis vaccine, an earlier UNICEF
program with this same vaccine in Chad resulted in dozens of dead children. And in all
of this, we seem to have an inclusion of all the usual suspects, namely, the WHO,
Doctors without Borders (MSF), UNICEF, Tulane University, the Gates Foundation,
USAID, the US-based CDC, Chatham House, the Council on Foreign Relations, the
Wellcome Trust, UNAIDS, the US-based NIH, the US military’s Medical Research
Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) from Fort Detrick, and what Shimatsu
calls “the rest of the alphabet soup of the hypocritical oafs of pharmaco-
witchcraft”. USAID has also been implicated in many of these disease
outbreaks.

He claims that “the herd instinct for self-preservation prevents any honest
disclosure” of the facts, and I would have to agree.

It’s also worth noting that MSF itself is nowhere near as angelic as it pretends,being
financed by what Shimatsu called “a rogue’s gallery of corporate
predators” that include Microsoft (Gates again), Goldman Sachs, AIG, Morgan
Stanley, Bank of America, BlackRock and Bloomberg. MSF’s chief aim, if I want
to be cynical, appears to be that of facilitator under the auspices of the WHO and
UNICEF to promote (occasionally illegal and often useless) mass vaccination programs
that produce huge profits for the big pharma companies. And MSF has been under
clouds of suspicion before.(12)

More than one writer has categorised the WHO’s vaccination programs as a “mafia-
style protection racket” where poor nations are bullied into spending unaffordable
sums of money on often useless vaccines. One such example was Donald Rumsfeld’s
prior pharma employer who marketed Tamiflu with enormous success in many
countries, to the extent of billions of dollars in cost, with panels of health experts later
declaring that Tamiflu had been “largely ineffective” and the money wasted. The
UK did the same, spending many hundreds of millions of pounds on useless vaccines
for non-existent epidemics. The same happened with the Ukraine, spending half
the country’s foreign currency reserves on flu vaccines that proved to be both
useless and unnecessary. There are many such stories. (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)

290
Ebola as Bioweapon

With this latest move by the Pentagon to help only foreign workers in Liberia, the message from the
United States, intended or not, rings loud and clear: African health-care workers and their patients
are not our priority. Source

The theory that Ebola is a bioweapon received some media attention when Liberia’s top
newspaper, The Liberian Observer, published a report by plant physiologist Dr. Cyril
Broderick, who suggested the virus was a genetically modified organism. (19) (20)
(21) He quoted Dr. Leonard Horowitz’s book on emerging viruses, in which
Horowitz “confirmed the existence of an American military-medical industry
that conducts biological weapons tests under the guise of administering
vaccinations to control diseases and improve the health of ‘black Africans
overseas’.[The] WHO and several other UN agencies have been implicated in
selecting and enticing African countries to participate in the testing events,
promoting vaccinations, but pursuing various testing programmes.”

American law professor Francis A. Boyle claimed the Ebola virus could have
originated from American bio-warfare labs in Africa, and revealed that the US
had been using West Africa as an offshore bio-weapons lab to circumvent the
Convention on Biological Weapons. (22) (23) According to Dr. Paul Craig
Roberts, it was Dr. Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism
Act of 1989, the US implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons
Convention. And, according to a map produced by the Center of Disease Control, it
291
does appear the virus victims were located in the same places as the American
bio-labs. (24) (25) It is worth noting here that Dr. Boyle is not an easy person to
dismiss as a flake or a conspiracy theorist, being a prominent American law professor
who was responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act and
other Biological Weapons conventions. He is well-versed in the subject of bio-
warfare and has written at least one book on the US military’s dramatic (and
illegal) bio-weapons programs.

One of the issues is that the US bullies smaller nations into rejecting
international bio-weapons treaties for the purpose of using those same non-
signatory nations as locations for its secret bio-warfare labs. This “offshoring”
is just a clever way to violate the Biological Weapons Conventions that the US
has signed while at the same time being entirely outside the purview and
supervision of Congress (and the media). Often, even the host nations have no
clear idea of what transpires in these so-called “health facilities” the US military
establishes inside their own countries, this condition often being maintained by large
cash disbursements.

There was another disturbing aspect to this entire Ebola enterprise, that being a report
in the New York Times that the Zaire Ebola strain was identified or created many
years ago (26) (27), and that the WHO ordered it shipped to the UK’s bio-weapons
facility at Porton Down, from where it was sent to the US-based CDC who do similar
work. (28) (29) Dr. Boyle speculated this virus was then exported to the US military’s
bio-labs in West Africa where development was continued. Yoichi Shimatsu noted
correctly that “the simultaneous eruptions [of this virus] in widely-separated
zones” suggest it was introduced as part of the US military-funded bio-weapons
research program.

In the article mentioned above, Broderick claimed the epidemic was the result of
work done by the US Department of Defense, among others. Apparently a great
many readers praised his article, expressing their own sympathetic concerns for the
large number of unexplained ‘coincidences’ of disease outbreak overlaid with US
military experimentation on biological pathogens and the seemingly ever-present WHO
and its vaccination programs. The US mainstream media attempted to dismiss his
comments as relying on information from so-called ‘conspiracy websites’, but he
appears to have had many legitimate references on which to base his comments and
accusations, published reports he stated were ‘unambiguous’. Dr. Broderick’s main
concern was that diseases such as Ebola and others were designed “for culling
the world’s black population”, a claim that would be much easier to refute or dismiss
out of hand if not for the US military’s proven experiments in designing precisely such
race-specific pathogens. To dismiss this without careful thought would seem to
be reckless indeed.

292
 On July 24, 2014, in Sierra Leone, Sister Nancy Yoko, a nurse, speaks with colleagues in the office of
the Ebola virus disease -EVD- treatment center at Kenema Government Hospital. Staff at the center
are devastated by the loss of six nurses and one doctor who contracted EVD while caring for patients.
The few nurses who remain are exhausted, overworked and demoralized. “We are known as the
‘Ebola nurses,'” says Ms. Yoko. “No one wants to come close to us. The nurses in the general ward
won’t talk to us. Even our families are scared they will catch the virus from us.” Source

The statements of US bio-weapons labs dotting Africa are not imagination. In the
midst of the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone was privately-owned Tulane
University from New Orleans (30) (31) (32), an institution known for
conducting bio-weapons research for the US military at USAMRIID. Tulane
executives had been boasting of having conducted “the largest and most detailed
case [studies] of Ebola patients”, most of whom unfortunately died, and was
accused of providing local hospitals with Ebola diagnosis kits that were either useless
or fraudulent. (33) (34) In any case, Tulane, the US military, and Doctors without
Borders apparently jointly established a hospital at Kenema that provoked
local outrage and sent all hospital staff on strike and forcing a government
investigation of the nearly 100% death rate. A representative for the group, Dr.
Tim Jagatic of Doctors Without Borders, said it was “understandable” that locals
believed they would all die if placed in the American hospital: “We created a hospital,
and a lot of people [died]. It’s very difficult for them to make a connection that we are
here to help”. No kidding. When all the patients die, what is the difference
between hospital and no hospital? (35) (36)
293
But it wasn’t only the hospital that outraged the locals and caused panic; it
was also the fact that the US military was operating a bio-weapons research
lab at the same location, with all evidence apparently suggesting a strong
connection between that military research lab at Kenema, the Kenema
hospital, Tulane’s Ebola research, the Ebola outbreak, and the high death
rate. In addition to the closing of the hospital and the ejection of Tulane University, the
US military was also forced to shut down its bio-weapons lab in Sierra
Leone. The government also ordered the US-based CDC – another bio-weapons-
related contractor – to submit all the data from its own labs in Kenema, apparently for
a government investigation into this tightly-knit foreign collaboration. Of course the
Western media like the Washington Post ignored all of this in their haste to trash anyone
who dared contradict the official “Fruit bat – Act of God” theory of origin, dismissing
inconvenient truths as “churning out Ebola conspiracy after conspiracy”.

Suspicions

Dimitris Konstantakopoulos

Source
294
Many nations in Africa, as in South America and Asia, have become increasingly
suspicious of US and UN so-called “health” activities within their borders, not
forgetting Kissinger’s NSSM paper that said,“The United States economy will
require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from
less developed countries.”, and that called for a huge increase in funding
for “creating conditions conducive to fertility decline”. They are also aware of the
Rumsfeld-Cheney PNAC paper that stated, “Advanced forms of biological warfare
that can target specific genotypes, may transform biological warfare from the realm of
terror to a politically useful tool.” (37) (38) (39)

To accentuate these, in the aftermath of the Ebola outbreaks, US President Obama

announced he would send 3,000 troops to Africa, while Cuba, China and other
nations were sending doctors, virologists and medications. The US government
and military have been rather cagey about the precise qualifications of the troops being
sent to Africa, providing only a nonsensically-vague statement of what appears to be
cautionary behavior to protect themselves from infection, the troops receiving
vaccinations and “training on medical readiness requirements”. But in fact, the
US soldiers being sent to Africa “to fight Ebola” were an elite division of combat troops
who have no medical or other training that would be of use to anyone, and Dr. Boyle
(as well as many Africans) is convinced they have been sent to establish
permanent US military bases on the continent. Africans are naturally
asking, “What does Africa need today, troops or doctors?”, with many
considering the US effort a “sham” that is simply a prelude to military
colonisation of Africa under the pretense of medical security.

The serum cures and vaccinations are being withheld from Africa and utilised for whites
only. Source

295
It has not escaped their notice that, while military personnel are being “shared”
generously, the serum cures and vaccinations are being withheld from Africa and
utilised for whites only. And of course, the US has a long and irrefutable history of
intentionally infecting countless thousands of people in the US itself and in many other
nations, including the famous Guatemala and Tuskegee syphilis
experiments that continued for 40 years, the mass sterilisations of US citizens
including indigenous natives and much of the population of Puerto Rico. West
Africans are terrified of international aid programs for fear of another genocide
campaign, and no one can blame them for their suspicions. The distrust of foreigners,
and of Americans especially, has become so intense in some African locations that
foreign clinics and hospitals have been attacked and burned, and some foreign aid
workers and medical staff assaulted. It isn’t difficult to understand why. Dr.
Broderick went so far as to claim there is sufficient evidence and clearly “the
need to pursue criminal and civil redress for damages”, against the US
government, Tulane University, the WHO, and at least one pharma company.

The disease was surprisingly hyped in the media. Though Ebola can certainly be
lethal, the death rate (kill rate) was nowhere near the publicised ratios and,
while 1,000 or more people did die from it in the first year, in the same year
there were more than 200 million cases of malaria worldwide, with nearly
500,000 deaths, 90% of these in Africa, and mostly children. Yet this rated no
attention whatever in the Western media. If 500,000 deaths aren’t sufficient for even
a mention, much less a declaration of apocalypse, why would 1,000 deaths qualify? Is
it possible that part of this reason is that malaria is treated with simple low-cost
medications like quinine, with no opportunity to sell billions of doses of yet another
hugely profitable vaccine? The same has been true with many other “epidemic”
infections including ZIKA, where very few died, a relative handful suffered
birth defects of questionable origin, but where the human toll was
insignificant compared to malaria, and yet the world media were flooding the
ether with hype and dire prognostications.

Some of AFRICOM’s known permanent and semi-permanent military bases on the African continent,
2019. Source
296
If the real concern of the WHO or MSF were saving human lives, where is the
malaria effort? If Obama really wanted to save the world when he vowed that
“We will not stop, we will not relent until we halt this epidemic once and for
all”, why wouldn’t he send thousands of troops to Africa to save 500,000 lives
from malaria instead of 1,000 from Ebola?

It hardly qualifies as a conspiracy theory when observers suggest the US

military’s commitment is more about population control and military
dominance to ensure access to natural resources than about saving lives. In
this context, the US military “commitment” to eradicating Ebola qualifies more
as a deprecating insult and bad joke than a humanitarian gesture. Ignore the
claims and the media hype, and examine the results. Ignoring malaria makes a
significant contribution to population reduction, no doubt warming the cockles of
hearts of our well-known Malthusians, while providing a convenient platform for
the US militarisation of Africa. Whether or not these are the intentions, they
are the result and, in foreign affairs, it is usually an error of simplistic naïveté
to assume that obtained results were not those intended.

297
Notes

(1) https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10559743167269800
(2) http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_101807.sh
tml
(3) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/09/26/an-
american-professor-is-telling-liberians-that-the-u-s-manufactured-ebola-outbreak/
(4) https://www.globalresearch.ca/a-liberian-scientist-claims-the-u-s-is-
responsible-for-the-ebola-outbreak-in-west-africa/5408459
(5) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4389695/
(6) https://www.liberianobserver.com/news/security/ebola-aids-manufactured-by-
western-pharmaceuticals-us-dod/
(7) https://www.thestandard.co.zw/2017/08/05/usa-epidemic-spreading-africa/
(8) https://www.faceofmalawi.com/2014/09/scientists-allege-deadly-diseases-
such-as-ebola-and-aids-are-bio-weapons-being-tested-on-africans/
(9) https://rense.com/general96/ebobreakout.html
(10) https://eclinik.net/ebola-made-in-the-usa-by-big-pharma-dept-of-defense/
(11) https://www.21cir.com/specialists/yoichi-shimatsu/page/3/
(12) https://geopolitics.co/2013/08/26/doctors-without-borders-aiding-terrorists/
(13) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-roche-hldg-novartis-search-
idUSBREA390EJ20140410

298
(14) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/10/tamiflu-britain-drug-
shortens-not-cure-bouts
(15) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/10/uk-wasted-560m-
stockpiling-flu-drugs
(16) https://www.foxnews.com/health/millions-of-dollars-wasted-on-flu-drug-
tamiflu-review-finds
(17) https://www.channel4.com/news/tamiflu-roche-bird-swine-flu-pandemic-gsk-
stockpile
(18) https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/apr/10/tamiflu-saga-drug-trials-
big-pharma
(19) https://tvaraj.com/2014/10/08/cyril-broderick-ebola-virus/
(20) https://www.liberianobserver.com/opinion/commentaries/dr-brodericks-
ebola-theory-under-the-microscope-no-germ-of-truth-2/
(21) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/09/26/an-
american-professor-is-telling-liberians-that-the-u-s-manufactured-ebola-outbreak/
(22) https://biologicalweapons.news/2020-02-04-transcript-dr-francis-boyle-
interview-coronavirus-biological-weapon.html
(23) http://www.srilankaguardian.org/2014/10/us-bio-warfare-laboratories-in-
west.html
(24) https://www.nigeriandateline.com/article.php/ebola-developed-in-us-bio-
warfare-labs/189/1
(25) https://www.21cir.com/2014/10/us-bio-warfare-laboratories-in-west-africa-
are-the-origins-of-the-ebola-epidemic/
(26) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/07/health/there-before-ebola-had-a-
name.html
(27) https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/03/world/africa/ebola-congo-
outbreak.html
(28) https://www.businessinsider.com/ebola-virus-timeline-possible-cure-2019-8
(29) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2827505/Belfast-patient-tested-
Ebola.html
(30) https://outbreak.tulane.edu/diseases/ebola/
(31) https://news.tulane.edu/news/genetic-study-finds-perfect-storm-behind-
deadliest-ebola-outbreak

299
(32) https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-real-reason-for-distrust-of-
ebola-efforts-in-sierra-leone/2015/11/20/db2deb6e-8cab-11e5-934c-
a369c80822c2_story.html
(33) https://www.cbsnews.com/news/american-company-metabiota-problems-
during-ebola-outbreak/
(34) https://www.thesierraleonetelegraph.com/president-ernest-bai-koromas-new-
legal-headache/
(35) https://www.cbsnews.com/news/american-company-metabiota-problems-
during-ebola-outbreak/
(36) https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-ebola-virus-pandemic-a-weapon-of-mass-
destruction/5394976
(37) https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
(38) https://www.transcend.org/tms/2016/11/project-for-the-new-american-
century/
(39) http://forums.canadiancontent.net/showthread.php?t=33346

300
The ZIKA virus is named after the ZIKA forest in Uganda, where it was first
discovered, and is a type of flavivirus, closely related to those which cause more
serious diseases like dengue and yellow fever. ZIKA normally produces symptoms
such as fever or conjunctivitis and sometimes joint pain, but typically so mild that the
symptoms last for only a few days and most people don’t even know they have it. The
ZIKA is not contagious but is transmitted by mosquitoes, which means you must
be bitten by an infected mosquito to contract it. Africans have developed antibodies
to the virus and are mostly immune, but Westerners have no such immunity and for them
there is no vaccine or cure for the ZIKA virus, though none is generally necessary.

The virus was first isolated from a rhesus monkey in Uganda in 1947, was
discovered in a few humans in Uganda and Tanzania some years later, and in
humans in Nigeria in 1968. (1) (2) There was never any indication that the virus
“traveled well”, and it remained an obscure and unremarkable illness with only a
handful of reported cases for 40 years until it suddenly appeared on a South
Pacific island in Micronesia in 2007, which was the first time it had been seen outside
its original home, but where it apparently did nothing of consequence. (3) Some six or
seven years later, there was a outbreak in French Polynesia, also in the South
Pacific, that affected about 10% of the population, but this time with the added feature of
apparently causing Guillain-Barré syndrome, a rare autoimmune disorder in which
the body’s immune system attacks itself, or at least the body’s nerves, and can
be paralysing or even fatal.Then after a hiatus of seven or so years ZIKA appeared
abruptly in Brazil, with a virtually simultaneous spread to more than 20 other
countries. On this occasion, ZIKA was now linked to a severe birth defect

301
called microcephaly and possibly other birth defects and neurological
disorders.Those are the basic facts.

Some Brazilian researchers are questioning the link between Zika virus and microcephaly. Source

There was substantial controversy about the links between ZIKA and microcephaly, the
official narrative being that ZIKA was suspected – and indeed was strongly promoted – as
the cause, but always with caveats suggesting the links might have been
coincidental or opportunistic rather than causal. (4) (5) One group of medical
practitioners in Brazil wrote a paper suggesting microcephaly was either caused by, or
linked to, the dispersal of the chemical pyroxiprophen, an insecticide recommended
by the WHO, which was heavily sprayed in drinking water reservoirs in the areas
exhibiting the highest incidences of the condition, a theory that appeared to have at
least a solid circumstantial basis. The physicians stated that pyriproxifen was a hormone
disruptor and growth inhibitor that altered the development process of mosquitoes,
generating malformations and causing their death or incapacity to reproduce. They
wrote, “Malformations detected in thousands of children from pregnant women
living in areas where the Brazilian state added pyriproxifen to drinking water is
not a coincidence, even though the Ministry of Health [rules out] the hypothesis
of direct and cumulative chemical damage.”(6) A German epidemiologist, Dr.
Christoph Zink, had been studying and charting the timing and geographic distribution of
both ZIKA and microcephaly, and wrote “I soon got the idea that blaming the ZIKA
virus for this epidemic does not really get to the point”, stating a suspicion there had
been under-reporting of cases for years. (7) But, according to a CBC report, he also
suspected a chemical explanation for the heavy concentration in Northeastern Brazil,
stating, “I would ask my toxicological colleagues in Brazil to please look very
closely into the practical application of agrochemicals”.Others discounted this
hypothesis on the basis of an inconsistent time-line and some conflicting data. Be this as

302
it may, the links between ZIKA and the birth defects appeared at the time of writing (and
later) to be only coincidental at best, with no evidence of direct causality.

It was interesting that this debate conducted itself with more heat than light, exhibiting the
kind of characteristics we associate with the pros and cons of 5G communication, that is
to say more ideological and emotional than scientific. It was also interesting that
the American CDC and the UN’s WHO acted fervently to lay the blame for birth
defects directly on ZIKA while simultaneously building an exit for possible later use with
what I thought were rather cleverly-worded suggestions that the link was “not entirely
proven”.

This clearly coordinated campaign, with its vast international media support,
carried with it a powerful scent of an intent to deflect the main issue into a desired
channel and thereby discourage active investigation or discussion of topics
outside the official approved list. Evidence of this seemed apparent in the unwarranted
eagerness with which officials and the many elements of the media literally trashed
anyone suggesting a story line that differed from the official version.As I wrote in
the Introduction, a clear warning sign that a desired official story is being crafted is when
those presenting contrary facts and theories are not only immediately and widely
denounced as biased ideologues but derided as conspiracy theorists. ZIKA fit this template
very well.

Whatever the totality of truths may be about this viral outbreak, the media coverage – the
official narrative – about ZIKA quickly focused entirely on the statistically insignificant
numbers of birth defects in relation to the total infected populations, and the simultaneous
initiation of a concentrated debate about the cause of such defects, while dismissing in a
single careless phrase the origin of the ZIKA outbreak itself. While it is the origin and
cause of the outbreak that should have been the main story, the official narrative
pushed this aspect into the background where the media buried it. And it is
primarily this that contained the scent of an attempt to deflect the main issue not only into
a desired channel but away from other, perhaps politically dangerous, aspects of the event.
So let’s take a few minutes to examine the curious origin of this outbreak.

As already noted, ZIKA was never predisposed to travel, considering that it sat in Uganda
since 1947 and went nowhere. Surely it had multiple opportunities to attach itself to a
person or mosquito and land on another continent. But no. It stayed at home, and for
almost 60 years was not a public menace, had never been associated with birth or
other physical defects, and attracted no attention.

So, if this ZIKA virus could stay at home and remain more or less localised for 60
years, why would it suddenly begin travelling the world? And, if the virus had never
spread explosively at home in Africa in that 60 years, how could it suddenly become so
active and virulent as to have infected almost the entirety of South and Central
America in only a few months?

303
 Countries with confirmed Zika virus cases. Data from WHO February 2016. Source

Let’s review the path. One day in 2007, ZIKA traveled by means unknown, 15,000
kilometers from Africa to land on a tiny Micronesian island named Yap, where it
rested for six or seven years doing nothing remarkable, then continued its voyage
of several thousand kilometers to French Polynesia where it landed to infect a
large percentage of the population and do rather more harm. After another
lengthy pause of six or seven years it began another voyage, this time traveling
12,000 kilometers or so, crossing much of the Pacific Ocean, the US and Mexico,
all of Central America and the Caribbean, and finally traversing all of South
America to land on the Atlantic side in Rio and São Paulo. From there, it almost
instantaneously radiated outward 4,000 or 5,000 kilometers in all directions to
cover most of Brazil(the fifth-largest country in the world). ZIKA then spread to all
of South and Central America and the Caribbean, flooding more than 20 countries
within a few months, then embarked on journeys of 8,000 kilometers or more,
voyaging as far as Mexico and Puerto Rico. It then quickly headed Northeast on
another journey of 8,000 kilometers to land in Spain where it was predicted to
become a calamity.

Now let’s think about the journey. Viruses can’t fly, and they don’t travel on
airplanes. They travel by mosquito, and mosquitoes don’t travel either. They live their
entire short lives within maybe one kilometer of wherever they were hatched. It’s
true they are sometimes blown around by prevailing winds and could potentially end up
almost anywhere, but these wind-blown insects tend to number in the tens or
hundreds rather than the hundreds of millions necessary to infect millions of
people in a vast country like Brazil. Some news media published deliberately misleading
and unforgivably uninformed reports referring to the “migration patterns” of mosquitoes,
304
but mosquitoes do not migrate, not in any sense of the meaning of that word. Birds migrate,
caribou migrate, locusts and lemmings migrate. Monarch butterflies migrate. Ducks, geese
and hummingbirds migrate. Mosquitoes do not migrate. They cannot.

As one entomologist wrote, “mosquitoes live within a mile or two of their breeding grounds
their entire life, with little evidence they make purposeful long distance flights that can be
classified zoologically as migration. It is better to regard all mosquito flights as dispersal.”
In other words, we cannot have tens of millions of mosquitoes, infected or
otherwise, filling their tiny luggage with mini-viruses and flying 15,000
kilometers to take up residence in another country. We are told that mosquitoes will
sometimes breed in pools of water, in old auto tires and other odd places, and can by this
method be transported around the world, but again the numbers of insects traveling this
way would be exceedingly low for our purposes since no country – and certainly not Brazil
– is importing sufficient numbers of old tires to bring us the hundreds of millions of insects
we need to create an epidemic. And yes, mosquitoes breed, but to burgeon in only weeks
from a few infected mating pairs in one location to a few hundred million scattered over
millions of square kilometers is beyond the ability even of mosquitoes.

The Infected World Cup Visitor

Zika Virus Transmission Cycle. Source

305
And it was here that the WHO and the Western media began crafting their tale. The
official narrative was that the mosquitoes never did travel. Instead, the virus found itself a
means of long-distance transport and was “believed to have been brought to Brazil by
an infected visitor to the World Cup”. Thus, according to the WHO and the compliant
media, a lone traveler infected millions of people in Rio and within a few months the disease
had spread to Colombia, Paraguay, Venezuela, Panama, the Honduras, Guyana, Martinique,
Puerto Rico and Mexico, and altogether more than 20 countries. We need only think for
a moment to realise this proposition is a ridiculous impossibility.I wrote above that
the origin of the ZIKA outbreak was dismissed in a single careless phrase, that phrase being
“believed to have been brought to Brazil by an infected visitor to the World Cup”, a
statement tossed out with no evidential support, one that appears superficially credible but
which constitutes logical rubbish.And, as we will see, ZIKA was in Brazil long before
the World Cup.Remember, ZIKA is not a contagious disease spread by coughing or
sneezing or even extended social contact. It is a virus infection carried by mosquitoes,
and one must be bitten to contract it. The traveling of infected people from Polynesia
to Brazil is of no consequence in itself since the only way to transmit their disease is by
being bitten by mosquitoes, which might in turn become infected then spread the infection
by biting others. (8)

Let’s take a moment to think about the supposedly-infected (and surely

imaginary) World Cup visitor, and consider the astonishingly-rapid spread of the
infection. The official narrative was that the virus came to Brazil from French Polynesia,
but how many people, infected or otherwise, would be likely to travel from the tiny
population of French Polynesia to Brazil just to watch a football game? Two? Ten? So how
could clean, uninfected Brazilian mosquitoes find those few infected Polynesian people, bite
them and become infected in turn, then spread the infection to at least tens of millions of
insects in a few months so as to bite and infect many millions of people throughout the
entirety of Latin America? The sheer volume of the outbreak coupled with its virtually
instantaneous spread, dismisses any possibility of this infection originating with a foreign
traveler. One mosquito biting one person does not constitute an epidemic.

If we want to have an “explosive spread” of a mosquito-borne virus like the ZIKA, which
infected millions of people in only a very short time, we need at least tens of millions of
mosquitoes but more reasonably we need hundreds of millions of them. This is
especially true when the mosquitoes seem determined to infect the enormous land areas
of South and Central America, passing over vast unpopulated areas in the process.
Not every mosquito is infected, not every infected mosquito will find someone to bite, not
everyone will be bitten, and not everyone bitten will be infected. And a mosquito’s life
is very short indeed, about ten days.

With only a handful of infected people, such a widespread epidemic is impossible by this
method of transmission. The number of travelers is statistically insignificant, so even if they
were all bitten many times by different insects, the totality of those insects could not have
in turn bitten and infected millions of people in 20 countries within a few months, especially
countries many thousands of kilometers away, considering that mosquitoes do not travel.
It’s true the infected mosquitoes would breed and perhaps contaminate their young, but
306
this would by definition be a localised outbreak with no natural possibility of traveling even
tens, much less thousands of kilometers to cover a continent. One infected mosquito cannot
breed millions of offspring and cover millions of square kilometers in a few months. And, if
one person traveled to Rio or São Paulo for a football game, how does that explain the
disease exploding in a dozen other cities in Brazil, all at approximately the same time? How
does that explain the disease spreading to Colombia and a dozen other nearby countries,
and 8,000 Kms away in Mexico and Puerto Rico, very shortly thereafter? Even if infected
travelers from Brazil went to Mexico, how many would be bitten by clean mosquitoes there,
and be able to pass on the virus? Statistically zero, or thereabouts.

Millions of mosquitoes cannot bite the same ten travelers, become infected, then bite
millions of other people and cause an epidemic. You don’t have to be a statistician to know
that’s not possible. If millions of people are infected, there had to have been at least many
millions of infected mosquitoes in the area. So, the most important question in this entire
saga is: how did at least tens, and more likely, hundreds, of millions of insects
become infected? The virus did not exist in Brazil. Native mosquitoes were not infected
with ZIKA, and could have become infected only by either biting countless thousands of
infected people, or else being the offspring from millions of matings with infected insects,
but where would those come from? A few infected travelers cannot account for such a
massive geographical outbreak within weeks, which means vast numbers of infected
mosquitoes must have been introduced in those locations. There is no other possible
explanation.

The WHO’s official statement said ZIKA appeared to be spreading so rapidly for
two reasons: One, because it was a new disease to the region and so the
population had no immunity, and two, because ZIKA is primarily transmitted by
a mosquito species known as A. aegypti, which lives in every country in North and
South America except Canada and Chile.These statements are deliberate
misinformation and unforgivably dishonest for what they neglect to say. The
portion about the lack of immunity is true, but that lack of immunity exists only because,
as the WHO itself pointed out, ZIKA is a new disease to the region, meaning it didn’t exist
in Brazil or South-Central America prior to this time. The second portion of the
statement is even more dishonest.The WHO tells us the disease spread so rapidly
because it is transmitted by a species of mosquito which exists locally, but the reason the
disease was new to the region in the first instance is that domestic mosquitoes had never
been infected and therefore could not possibly have been responsible for the dispersion of
the virus.

It is worth noting the cleverness of the WHO’s statement. It does not say the disease was
spread by local mosquitoes (and could not have been, since they weren’t infected), but
spread by the same species that lives in South America. That’s not exactly the same thing.
The fact that this strain of mosquito lives in South and Central America is entirely irrelevant
to the ZIKA outbreak because these local mosquitoes were not infected. The statement
appears to blame local insects – by family association, and we would normally draw this
inference from a casual reading, but if we examine the words, the statement tells us
absolutely nothing and is fraudulent because it leads us to a false
conclusion. The WHO glossed over the most important question in this entire issue, which
is how tens or hundreds of millions of a local variety of clean mosquitoes suddenly
307
became infected by a foreign virus and in a few months caused an epidemic
covering nearly 20 million square kilometers.

It is of course theoretically possible for a single infected person to initiate an eventual

epidemic, but consider the circumstances necessary. One infected person traveling to a
new location is bitten by one or more mosquitoes who become infected and who bite a few
other persons who become infected in turn. The infected mosquitoes breed and die, leaving
potentially infected offspring who can gradually spread the disease. At the beginning, this
would be tightly localised, not only in one city but likely in one area of one city since we
have very few infected mosquitoes that do not travel. Then gradually, infected persons
would move to other areas of the city and to other cities, and slowly spread the infection
to other areas. But it should be obvious that this method would require years to create an
epidemic, and would still not account for an explosive spread in the new locations. By
definition, a natural introduction and spread of a mosquito-borne virus would require years
to develop. The only physical way to have an explosive spread of an insect-borne
disease is to have hundreds of millions of infected insects. And, since Latin America
did indeed experience precisely such an explosive spread, the fundamental question is the
source of those infected insects.

Oxitec’s GM “Terminator” Mosquitoes

During the 2010s, Oxitec established partnerships with agricultural industry[14] leaders and the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation.[15] Source

There is one additional fact in this story, a fact that was heavily suppressed by the media.
It involves a company named Oxitec, which bills itself as “a British biotech company

308
pioneering an environmentally friendly [i.e. genetically-modified] way to control insect
pests that spread disease and damage crops”. Oxitec was conducting genetically-
modified “transgenic mosquito trials” in Braziland many other locations, trials that,
according to Science Magazine, “have not been without controversy in the past”. (9) It will
not be a surprise that one of Oxitec’s “collaborators” is the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, as well as other non-surprises that include the WHO, the CIA, the
Pentagon, the Rockefeller Foundation, Fort Detrick, and other luminaries of the
world of genetically-modified pathogens. In particular, one article that appeared to be
credible, claimed that the equity owners of Oxitec had strong links to the CIA. Other Oxitec
funders are the WHO, who provide research grants, and apparently a Hong Kong
investment fund called Asia Pacific Capital, which is controlled by GE Capital of the US.

Oxitec was conducting “experiments in the suppression of mosquitoes”, experiments which

involved the release of countless millions of genetically-modified Aedes aegypti
mosquitoes(the same species that spread the ZIKA virus) that had been bio-
engineered for male insterility. Oliver Tickell wrote an interesting article published in
The Ecologist on February 1, 2016, titled, “Pandora’s Box: how GM mosquitoes could have
caused Brazil’s microcephaly disaster”. (10) In it, he wrote, “The idea of the Oxitec
mosquitoes is simple enough: the males produce non-viable offspring which all
die. So the GM mosquitoes are ‘self-extinguishing’ and the altered genes cannot
survive in the wild population.”The theory is that these GM-modified ‘terminator’
mosquitoes will breed with native females to produce non-viable larvae, thereby eradicating
the entire mosquito population. Unfortunately, the truth, even according to Oxitec’s own
information, is that a large percentage of their mosquitoes are not sterile after all, that
many do survive and thrive, and that apparently a large percentage of native female insects
refuse to breed with these introduced GM terminators, rendering some part of the
experiment useless.

According to Tickell’s research, the insect dispersions occurred between May of 2011 and
early 2012 and, in some locations alone, involved millions per month. I do not know the
total number of locations in which mosquitoes were dispersed nor the total number of
insects dispersed, but for the disease to spread the way it did, the dispersion was certainly
carried out in many locations and likely involved tens of millions of insects in each case
and, with several years to breed, gives us the hundreds of millions we needed. Certainly
the dispersals in some instances contained massive volumes.

In the Cayman Islands, Oxitec “liberated” 3.3 million of their “transgenic mosquitoes” in
80 separate releases that covered only about 16 hectares of land, and the same a bit later
in Malaysia. (11) With 100 hectares in a square kilometer, how many mosquitoes would
have been released in 20 million square kilometers?

At this point, we can perhaps assume it was a micro-biologist from Oxitec who traveled to
Brazil, but not for the World Cup. This assumption explains many things, but apparently
not to the converted. Soon after, the world media were actively promoting the
theory that Oxitec’s “mutant” GM mosquitoes were instead being used to battle
ZIKA. (12) (13)

309
Tickell discussed the potential survival of the GM insects and how they could spread the
ZIKA infection, but ignored the much more important question of how they became infected
in the first place. Let’s try a direct analogy: You do not get rabies from a dog bite; you get
rabies when bitten by a rabid dog.If the dog doesn’t have rabies, all you get is a dog bite.
And dispersing thousands of non-rabid dogs into a clean environment will give you only
thousands of non-rabid dogs in a still-clean environment. You may get bitten much more
often, but you still won’t get rabies.

By this analogy, the vast dispersal of genetically modified Aedes aegypti mosquitoes is of
no consequence unless the mosquitoes are already infected with the ZIKA virus. If
they do not carry the virus, their bites will do nothing to their victims, leaving us with no
way to spread a foreign virus.

The important point, so studiously avoided by the CDC, the WHO and the media,
is that since ZIKA was not endemic to Brazil or indeed to South-Central America,
it had to be introduced from somewhere, and on a massive scale.

One infected visitor to the World Cup cannot do that, but importing and dispersing hundreds
of millions of infected mosquitoes can do that. It is not possible to disperse millions of
uninfected mosquitoes into a clean environment then have them magically become self-
infected by a virus whose nearest proximity is 18,000 kilometers distant, which means the
insects dispersed by Oxitec had to have been infected before their dispersalbecause there
is no other credible explanation for the comparatively instantaneous explosion of ZIKA in
so many millions of square kilometers, events that appeared to coincide with the dispersion
of Oxitec’s insects.

The question then is how a company like Oxitec could disperse millions of insects
without knowing they were infected.After all, they engineered the mosquitoes, they
surely were aware of the dangers, and certainly had the ability to do testing. The only
possible conclusion I see, is that they did know. If there is an alternative explanation,
I cannot imagine what it would be.

I am reminded of Dr. David Heymann of the WHO who, when speaking of the identical
issue of the origin and spread of HIV, claimed, “The origin of the AIDS virus is of no
importance … speculation on how it arose is of no importance.” I disagreed then, and I
disagree now. The WHO took enormous pains to obscure investigation into the origin and
spread of that virus, and appeared to be doing the same with ZIKA. In the Scientific Method,
we try to form a theory to explain the phenomena we witness. Then, if we can, we test our
assumptions and hypotheses to see if they correlate with the known facts. In this case, we
have unknowns and unanswered questions in a situation where the official explanation
doesn’t appear plausible, and where confusion exists in some facts. But if we theorise that
Oxitec carried out its field trials in these locations with infected mosquitoes our theory
explains almost everything we know about ZIKA. But this isn’t quite the end of the story.
310
Back to the Future

Many virologists and media sources inform us that the ZIKA virus was first isolated from a
monkey in the ZIKA Forest in Africa (Uganda) in 1947 while scientists were researching
Yellow Fever, but the more interesting parts of ZIKA’s story occurred in labs rather than
forests. The virus was isolated in a laboratory by a microbiologist named Jordi
Casals (14) (15), whose entire career (but for two years after graduation) was
funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, mostly working in labs at Yale University.
Casals was a specialist in ticks and virus-borne diseases (of the kind produced by
the US Military at Fort Detrick and Plum Island), as well as the viruses that cause
encephalitis and the kind of hemorrhagic fever the US dispersed in North Korea
during the war and later in Cuba.He was for years a consultant to the WHO and to the
US Army Research Institute in Bethseda, Maryland, where he was performing concurrent
work in what appeared to be related to bioweapons research.

The media and the medical history books tell us that after its discovery, ZIKA remained
an “obscure and unremarkable illness” that caused no trouble and was of no apparent
interest to anybody, but that’s not entirely correct. After Casals isolated ZIKA from
Rockefeller Foundation monkey number 766, a quiet interest apparently emerged
in this ‘obscure’ virus, with both the WHO and America’s CDC establishing “virus
research laboratories” very near the same forest where ZIKA was discovered, and
in 2008 the Wellcome Trust – who are coincidentally one of Oxitec’s sources of funds –
also became involved in microbiology programs at the same location. (16) (17) The
311
Rockefeller Foundation established its East African Virus Research Institute in Entebbe,
Uganda, in 1936, the UVRI forming at the same time (with whom the CDC began working
in 1991, the WHO joining the affiliation in 1996). (18)

More recently, when the ZIKA outbreak occurred in 2007 on the Micronesian
island of Yap, the US military was reported to have sent what was described as
“a large research presence” to that island, consisting of individuals from both the
CDC labs at the University of Colorado and from the military, all experts in insect-
vector bio-pathogens. (19) (20) (21) Perhaps coincidentally and perhaps not, Yap
Island is only about 800 Kms. from Guam, the original site of the US
military’s NAMRU-2 biowarfare lab which depended primarily on researchers from the
Rockefeller Institute. And to bring us up to date with Brazil, one media report informed
us that two American researchers from the University of Wisconsin, one a
professor of pathobiological sciences named Jorge Osorio (22) (23), the other his
assistant named Matthew Aliota, were the first to identify ZIKA virus in South
America. Osorio’s assistant, Aliota, had a long history with the US Army’s bio-
warfare lab, USAMRIID, located at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and was also a
professor at Colorado State University, the source of the CDC’s virological staff
originally sent to Yap to examine the first ZIKA outbreak. (24) (25)

The Microcephaly Problem

Source

There had for many months been a flurry of media activity with reports containing an utter
confusion of claims about the incidence of this condition, a multitude of false alarms causing
misunderstandings and creating excessive caution. One report in the New York
Times claimed that fears of the virus resulted in “massive over-reporting”. In early

312
February of 2016, Brazil’s Health Ministry accounted for about 5,000 reported cases, but
in fact only a few hundred had actually been confirmed, an insignificant number that
would normally be buried within the statistical averages. Interestingly, the WHO was guilty
of laying most of the fuel onto this fire, announcing an “international health
emergency”, appearing primarily motivated to strongly focus public attention onto the
birth defects and away from other considerations. Indeed, virtually all of the media
attention appeared to focus on a few hundreds of potentially damaged fetuses and a few
thousands of symptomatic mothers rather than on the millions of civilians inexplicably
infected by a foreign virus of (so far) unknown provenance. In any case, the clear intent
was to establish a link in the public mind between ZIKA and birth defects, going so far as
to advise all mothers in South and Central America to delay planned pregnancies for several
years. Much of this was alarmist and unjustified. The New England Journal of Medicine
claimed that “29 percent of women who had ultrasound examinations after testing positive
for infection with the ZIKA virus had fetuses that suffered [undocumented] “grave
outcomes”.” (26) (27) But they neglected to mention that the total number of women in
this sample was only about 40, if memory serves me correctly.

The media reports on this problem, virtually without exception and certainly including all
those from the WHO, consisted mostly of dramatic attention-getting headlines. An article
would quote an apparently prominent virologist claiming his research “strongly indicated”
that “the ZIKA virus, and nothing else” was responsible for the rash of birth defects. Other
scientists were quoted as saying ZIKA targeted the brain cortex, leaving readers
to worry that every pregnant mother in all of Latin America would give birth to a
brain-damaged baby. A website calling itself the Virology Blog, run by a virologist and
professor at Columbia University in the US, stated that published reports made “a
compelling case that ZIKA virus is causing microcephaly in Brazil”, quoting from studies
with such small samples they were statistically invalid, and even admitting no confirmations
were available of ZIKA infections in the microcephaly cases studied. He even went so far
as to write, “Here is the clincher – the entire ZIKA virus genome was identified in brain
tissue” of an infant born with this condition. (28) Another virologist promptly informed this
writer that he had all his facts wrong, and that only small sections of the virus had in fact
been identified. Virology Blog – ZIKA virus is causing microcephaly in Brazil. (28)

Other scientists expressed their amazement that a flavivirus like ZIKA could cause birth
defects when no strain or variety of flavivirus had ever done so before. They noted too that
the Brazilian strain of the virus was a 99.75% match, indicating it was the same virus from
other areas of the world, and that birth defects existed in none of those places. Many
virologists stated that historically no flavivirus had ever been implicated in birth defects,
claiming the conditions pointed to a “localised environmental factor” or some other
cause. Dr. Ahmed Kalebi, Director of the Lancet Pathology Research Group, echoed a
similar sentiment, stating the possibility that “ZIKA is just a red herring and there is
something else . . . that makes those babies get microcephaly”. And a published study
posted on the WHO website stated, “ZIKA has been identified in Africa over 50 years ago,
and neither there nor in the outbreaks outside Africa, has such an association with
microcephaly [ever] been reported.” Another virologist wrote that there was no proof of a
cause-effect relationship, that the ZIKA virus might just have been “infecting
opportunistically, and that these are cases that would have developed birth defects even
without it”. Others noted that the apparent surge in these cases occurred only in
Northeastern Brazil, primarily in Pernambuco in and near Recife (where the WHO-

313
recommended insecticide pyroxiprophen was being sprayed), and many noted that there
was no actual proof of correlation between ZIKA and microcephaly, other than the fact that
the virus had been found in some infants with the condition. Unfortunately, none of these
other voices were ever able to reach the microphone.

And there is more. I downloaded a study from the WHO’s own website, titled “Microcephaly
in northeastern Brazil: a review of 16,208 births between 2012 and 2015” (29) that states
in part, “However, if the ZIKV were indeed introduced in Brazil at the World Cup
in mid 2014, the outbreak of microcephaly would have preceded it.” In case this
isn’t clear, the authors of this paper documented that microcephaly began appearing in
Brazil in 2011 and 2012, well prior to the appearance of the claimed “visitor from
Polynesia”, which by itself would seem irrefutable proof that the ZIKA virus cannot be
responsible for the birth defects in Latin America. Not only that, according to this same
paper, the initial appearances of microcephaly would have coincided perfectly with the
spraying of pyroxiprophen and the timing of Oxitec’s GM mosquito dispersal
program. Certainly the WHO was fully aware of this information, and the media pundits
either were aware or should have been aware, but these crucial facts were entirely
censored by all the media. In March of 2016, Canada’s CBC reported on another study
in Paraíba State in Brazil, which lies next to Perambuco, and which also discovered cases
of microcephaly prior to 2012, a full two years before the appearance of the supposed
Polynesian visitor, and which confirmed as well that these cases have been concentrated
in Brazil’s Northeast where the bulk of the chemical spraying was done. (30) (31) (32) (33)
Nevertheless, the New York Times was telling us “There is no longer any doubt that Zika
causes microcephaly”, quoting a study of ZIKA at estimated a “1 in 100” risk of
microcephaly. (34) (35)

The Media Focus

CDC IMAGES FOR FACEBOOK/TWITTER. Source

314
In the extensive media coverage of the ZIKA epidemic, several elements were not
only unusual but were so uniformly focused they had a distinct appearance of
having been coordinated as part of plan. The first of these I have already discussed:
the apparent absence of any interest whatever in the source of the ZIKA infection. Aside
from the almost-flippant attribution of a sudden and massive international
outbreak of ZIKA to a single traveler from Polynesia, I was unable to find any
reference, question or investigation by any part of the Western mainstream media
as to alternative explanations. It seems that no scientist or reporter in the Western
world had any apparent interest in this critical matter, a circumstance I find almost
bizarre. Every newspaper, TV station, publication, that I could monitor, studiously
avoided any mention of alternative explanations of the source of millions of
infected mosquitoes. With every other disease outbreak in the recent past, we have had
various theories and consequent debates as to source and origin, but not this time. This
is exceedingly curious, since the officially-attributed source is clearly impossible.

The second element was a persistent coordinated focus on the relatively few
instances of microcephaly to the neglect of almost every other aspect, leading one
to conclude the outbreak might consist of millions of microcephaly cases instead of
instances of a minor virus infection. This was true not only with the Western mass media
but also with internet searches. In repeated searches for the incidence of total ZIKA
infections in Brazil and other South American nations, Google repeatedly
produced only information on births with apparent ZIKA-related defects. I will note
here that Google’s searches are often highly selective in a manner not entirely explained
by an autonomous algorithm. When repeated and diligent searches on one topic produce
only results on another topic, it is safe for us to conclude that someone is pulling the
strings. In broad searches for rates of ZIKA infection, Google’s entire emphasis was on
supposedly ZIKA-related microcephaly cases, and searches for percentages produced more
of the same “reported but unconfirmed” statistics misleadingly quoted to infer that a
very high percentage of births were defective – which was absolutely not the
case. Let’s look at some statistics.

The total population of South and Central America is almost 450 million, with reported ZIKA
infections projected to total perhaps 4 million overall. This means that less than 1% of the
total populations of these countries will be infected with the ZIKA virus, of which a very
small portion (perhaps only 1% or 2% at any given time) will be pregnant
mothers. Remember too, that there were only a few hundred confirmed microcephaly cases
and only about 1% of those contained any link with ZIKA. This means that of all the
pregnancies in Brazil, perhaps one ten-thousandth will result in microcephaly and, as noted
above, only about 1% of these would exhibit a ZIKA infection. I by no means wish to
trivialise individual tragedies but, with confirmed cases measured as a percentage of the
population or by the incidence of all other primary causes of diseases and deaths, the
incidence of microcephaly in Brazil was statistically zero, whether ZIKA-induced
or not.

The next concern was what appeared to be a widespread and deliberate program
of fear-mongering, with a coordinated focus that I anticipated but found disturbing
nonetheless. Even the adjuncts were designed to be unsettling and frightening. For one
article on ZIKA, the Washington Post employed a photographic setting of a statue guarding
315
a tomb in a cemetery, with the caption, “Flower urns at many graves are breeding
grounds for the disease-carrying mosquitoes.” Why a cemetery setting? Why the
photo of graves? How many people had died from contracting ZIKA? Approximately none.
The Washington Post screamed that “The more we learn, the worse things seem to
get”. It told us of the virus “sweeping through the hemisphere” and wrote of the “growing
links to birth defects and neurological disorders” which were even “worse than originally
suspected”, and warning of the “increasing the risk for devastating harm” during
pregnancy.

The Washington Post told us, “Brazilians panic as mosquito linked to brain damage in
thousands of babies” (36) (37), and Canada’s Globe and Mail told us that “As the virus
ravages Brazil”, several hundred babies were left “with devastated brains” (38), while
failing to mention that Canada’s House of Parliament has suffered the same condition for
decades.

Thomas Frieden, Director of the US-based CDC, said he expected cases to increase
“dramatically” (39), and that “The cost of caring for one child with birth defects
can be $10 million or more”. He tearfully told us, according to the Washington Post,
of one woman “who was fearful of what would happen to her baby. To quote, “She said, ‘I
will be worried for my whole life, and even after I die, who is going to take care of the
baby’.” We were further informed that “studies showed” ZIKA was “likely behind more birth
defects and problems than researchers realised”, and was linked to “a broad array of birth
defects and neurological disorders”. As an aside, WHO Director-General Dr Margaret
Chan said ZIKA had gone “from a mild threat to one of alarming proportions”, and that
she had set up a ZIKA “emergency team” after the “explosive” spread of the virus. (40)

But as you will read elsewhere, Margaret Chan apparently wasn’t concerned about
Ebola that was killing by the tens of thousands, to the extent that the WHO
stopped answering their phones so people wouldn’t continue to bother them with
updates. It took years for Ebola – and other serious outbreaks, including the H5N1
flu and SARS in Hong Kong – to become “alarming” and explosive” and require
Margaret Chan to establish an “emergency team”, so why all the fuss about ZIKA
that killed nobody? To continue, the Washington Post further informed us:

“A growing concern among pediatricians is that ZIKA could inflict harm to

developing brain tissue in other, less obvious ways than microcephaly. That
condition could be the “tip of the iceberg” of a series of neurological problems, some of
which might not show up in the brain scans used to spot microcephaly, and it might not
even show up for years to come, These could include epilepsy, behavioral problems and
mental retardation, “It could be that these children are born with a normal head size but
manifest other problems later in life”.”

From this, we must gather that now even those babies appearing normal at birth are by no
means safe or healthy, that they might appear normal today but may very well become
delinquent, epileptic and mentally retarded at undetermined points in the future. So we
have not only a strong focus on the relatively few cases of confirmed birth defects, but
solemn and somber warnings that all births in the entirety of Latin America are
suspect far into the indefinite future.

316
In such a case, what does one do? Fortunately, the WHO, Western medical “experts”, and
the Washington Post, all reading from the same page, had the ready answer: legalised
abortions. And this was the final, and extraordinarily vocal, thrust of the media coverage.
And I have to say, I found this to be suspicious as hell. Reading from beginning to end, it
was difficult to avoid concluding that the purpose of the exaggerated focus on the birth
defects to the exclusion of all else, coupled with the intense fear-mongering that
followed, were simply the prelude to the main act which was to force a change in South
America’s abortion laws.

The fear-mongering paid off to some extent: The governments of many countries in
South and Central America, aided immeasurably by some elements of the media
and countless NGOs, advised all women to delay any planned pregnancies until
2018.

The New York Times, Bloomberg, Canada’s Public Health Service and others were
instructing Latin American women to avoid pregnancy (41) (42) (43) (44), while
the Washington Post ran an article on January 22, 2016 in which it informed that Latin
American countries were advising women to not only postpone pregnancies but
to avoid sex altogether. (45) But then it launched into what I thought was an
extraordinary propaganda piece on abortion in Latin America. It told us that the topic is
“Taboo in election campaigns”, then “estimated” the total number of induced abortions at
well over 850,000 per year, stating that perhaps ten million women had obtained illegal
abortions in Brazil alone during the prior ten years. In other words, roughly a third of all
pregnancies in Brazil had been aborted. And a group known as the Pan American Health
Organization, a sister to Margaret Chan’s WHO, produced a study claiming the numbers
were well over one million per year. (46) And not only that, but more than 20% of all
women in Brazil have had “at least one abortion” – this in a country where abortions are
illegal. But, according to these “experts”, it is clear that such a prohibition “does not prevent
women resorting to abortion”. I guess not. These “experts” even admitted their figures
were “ridiculously high”, but used this as proof that abortions would not increase if they
were legalised – which was the thrust of the entire argument and the purpose of the almost
certainly fabricated facts. The fear-mongering further reared its ugly head with an
(undocumented and certainly false) tale of one woman who “disappeared after entering an
illegal abortion clinic”, the article confiding to us that “She would have died during the
procedure and police suspect that her body was burned and dismembered”. With risks like
this, we should conclude that Brazilian women are nothing if not courageous, though I
would have thought the more common procedure would be to dismember first
and burn later. But then maybe things are different in Brazil.

The Washington Post ran another article on February 8, 2016, titled, “ZIKA prompts
urgent debate about abortion in Latin America” (47), in which they stated (much too
gleefully, I thought) that calls to loosen restrictive abortion laws were “gaining
momentum”, and that “activists” were “pressing lawmakers” to act swiftly in removing
these laws. According to the Post, the pro-abortion lobby was “taking advantage of this to
liberalize the legislation”, and one spokesman for a pro-abortion NGO named ‘Bureau for
the Life and Health of Women’ hoped that “ZIKA would change the debate”. (48) (49) We
were also informed of another Canadian NGO named ‘Women on Web’, who specialise
in shipping abortion-inducing drugs through the mail (for a “donation” of $100)
317
into countries where abortions are prohibited by law. The article informed us that,
sadly, “Often, government customs inspectors seize the pills.” No idea why.“And a
columnist named Hélio Schwartsman wrote that he has interviewed a woman that said
if she were pregnant and discovered she’d been infected by ZIKA, “I would not hesitate
an instant to abort”, dismemberment and subsequent incineration apparently being an
insufficient disincentive. (50) (51)

I should note here that the Washington Post and all other Western media, while positively
glowing about the prospects of abortion being legalised in South and Central America,
neglected to mention that all the “activists”, the NGOs, and the “pro-abortion lobbies” were
all US-based or US-funded, as well as often being US-managed, many or most closely
connected to USAID and US-based Planned Parenthood, who are in turn the Great-
Grandfather and Great-Grandmother of eugenics, abortion, forced sterilisation,
and population reduction.

Then the New York Times, not one to be left out of the excitement, ran an article by
a Simon Romero, informing that “ZIKA Virus Has Brazilians Re-examining Strict
Abortion Laws”, and that “the surging reports” of babies with microcephaly “are
igniting a fierce debate” over the country’s abortion laws. Romero also noted that
(American) “abortion rights activists are seizing on the crisis” to change the country’s
laws. (52)”Pregnant women across Brazil are now in a panic”, he tells us, which is no great
surprise given “the surging reports” and the extraordinary amount of fear-mongering the
media contributed to aid their momentum. After reading all the Western media stories, I’d
be in a panic too. He noted that “some activists”, American as usual, compare this to the
US debate on abortion following measles infections in that country, a situation that “paved
the way” for abortion in California and then most states in the US. “The fears over the ZIKA
virus are giving us a rare opening to challenge the religious fundamentalists who put the
lives of thousands of women at risk in Brazil each year to maintain laws belonging in the
dark ages.”

It needs to be noted somewhere that casual abortions as a means of birth control may not
necessarily qualify as a “universal value”. People and societies in different countries are
entitled to form their own values, especially those values involving human life, without the
belligerent assistance of either Planned Parenthood or the Washington Post, and if the
countries in Latin America want to restrict abortions or if China wants to restrict
pornography, it is nobody else’s business and is a gross violation of sovereignty to attempt
to force our Western or other values onto them. We formed our values, such as they
are, without interference from others, and they have the right to do the same.

It is a truth in all matters involving foreign affairs, most especially those carrying significant
social, political or economic implications, that there are no fortuitous events, no
“coincidences”, that all things happen because they are planned, with the final result
inevitably being according to expectation and plan. How then do we think about ZIKA? It
seems implausible that the intense onslaught by the WHO and the media, wildly
exaggerating what appeared to be non-existent dangers, was simply unintelligent
and purposeless fear-mongering. This, and the sudden overwhelming push for legalised

318
abortions were too unanimous, too widespread, and too well-orchestrated to have been
merely opportunistic. How then do we think about Oxitec’s release of hundreds of
millions of mosquitoes that were almost certainly infected with ZIKA? How do we
think about the unanimous official narrative of ZIKA packing its bags and
traveling halfway around the world to Brazil at the time of the World Cup? A
coincidence? How do we think about ZIKA choosing as its new home the one place
in the world with concentrated abortion restrictions? How do we think about the
media ignoring the logic in these questions and trashing anyone who raised them?

What were the results of the ZIKA outbreak? The most noticeable was an
unparalleled opportunity to raise a critical mass clamoring for legalised abortions, but
there were others. Media reports estimated South America would lose at least $53 billion
in tourism revenue from the widely-advised travel restrictions. (53) (54) Metropole would
have to search hard indeed to find a more convenient economic sanction for a
recalcitrant socialist periphery. And of course, economic hardship coupled with
public fear and panic easily decay into social unrest, and are the precursor of
choice as a seedbed for regime change. We have seen all of these, and more.

319
Notes

(1) https://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/timeline/en/

(2) https://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/history/en

(3) https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/16-171082/en

(4) https://www.huffpost.com/entry/zika-monsanto-pyriproxyfen-
microcephaly_n_56c2712de4b0b40245c79f7c

(5) https://www.nature.com/articles/srep40067

(6) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5760164/

(7) https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/microcephaly-brazil-zika-reality-1.3442580

(8) https://www.reuters.com/article/health-zika-brazil-exclusive-idUSKCN0VA33F

(9) https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt0111-9a

(10) https://theecologist.org/2016/feb/01/pandoras-box-how-gm-mosquitos-could-have-caused-
brazils-microcephaly-disaster

(11) http://www.genewatch.org/sub-566989

(12) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3722573/Mutant-UK-mosquitoes-fight-Zika-Florida-
Genetically-modified-insects-pass-killer-gene-set-released-attempt-stop-spread-virus.html

(13) https://www.builtreport.com/genetically-modified-mosquitos-to-fight-zika-virus/

(14) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC390228/

(15) https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/11/5/471/htm

(16) https://www.afro.who.int/news/uganda-virus-research-institute-approved-regional-reference-
laboratory-yellow-fever

(17) https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/countries/uganda/default.htm

320
(18) http://hardnoxandfriends.com/2020/04/09/where-oh-where-did-zika-virus-go-after-2016/

(19) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26282227_Zika_Virus_Outbreak_on_Yap_Island_Fe
derated_States_of_Micronesia

(20)http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1469-0691.12707/full

(21) https://health.mil/News/Articles/2019/07/01/Zika-Virus-Surveillance

(22) https://mhdtg.wisc.edu/staff/osorio-dvm-phd-jorge/

(23) https://vetmed.umn.edu/bio/college-of-veterinary-medicine/matthew-aliota

(24) https://vetmed.umn.edu/departments/veterinary-and-biomedical-sciences/news-events/vbs-
welcomes-vector-borne-agreett-hire-dr-matthew-aliota

(25) https://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/07/06/us-army-and-france-sanofi-combine-work-
zika-vaccine.html

(26) https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/grave-outcomes-likely-associated-with-zika-infection-during-
pregnancy-study-1.2804329

(27) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-zika-fetus-idUSKCN0W62Q1

(28) https://www.virology.ws/2016/01/28/zika-virus/

(29) https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/16-171223.pdf

(30) https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/microcephaly-brazil-zika-reality-1.3442580

(31) https://thevaccinereaction.org/2016/09/brazil-study-raises-major-doubts-about-zika-
microcephaly-link/

(32) https://inhabitat.com/is-zika-the-real-cause-of-microcephaly-in-brazil-new-study-raises-
questions/

(33) https://globalnews.ca/news/2512640/is-zika-virus-causing-a-spike-in-microcephaly-in-babies/

(34) https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/14/health/zika-virus-causes-birth-defects-cdc.html

(35) https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/health/zika-virus-microcephaly-rate.html

(36) https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/brazilians-panic-as-mosquito-linked-to-
brain-damage-in-thousands-of-babies/2016/01/15/7e8e2dec-b8ca-11e5-85cd-
5ad59bc19432_story.html

(37) https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/12/23/brazil-declares-
emergency-after-2400-babies-are-born-with-brain-damage-possibly-due-to-mosquito-borne-virus/

(38) https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/the-globe-in-brazil-zikas-
groundzero/article28934757/

(39) https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/sep/9/dr-thomas-frieden-cdc-chief-zika-will-be-
sobering-/

(40) https://nationalpost.com/news/zika-virus-explosive-spread-is-a-global-emergency-and-
extraordinary-event-who-says

(41) https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/09/health/zika-virus-women-pregnancy.html

321
(42) https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/10/health/zika-virus-pregnancy-who.html

(43) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-25/countries-hit-with-zika-virus-are-telling-
women-not-to-get-pregnant

(44) https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/zika-virus/pregnant-planning-
pregnancy.html

(45) https://www.washingtonpost.com/zika-and-pregnancy/bf70c3c4-23e0-4981-9ff3-
3624ffcdef0c_note.html (avoid sex)

(46) https://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/26/world/abortions-across-latin-america-rising-despite-
illegality-and-risks.html

(47) https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/zika-prompts-urgent-debate-about-
abortion-in-latin-america/2016/02/07/b4f3a718-cc6b-11e5-b9ab-26591104bb19_story.html

(48) https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/zika-awakens-debate-over-legal-and-safe-abortion-
in-latin-america1/

(49) https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/08/05/zika-outbreak-could-reignite-abortion-
debate/87961918/

(50) https://www.newscientist.com/article/2094448-zika-virus-prompts-increase-in-unsafe-
abortions-in-latin-america/

(51) https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/jul/19/zika-emergency-pushes-women-
to-challenge-brazil-abortion-law

(52) https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/04/world/americas/zika-virus-brazil-abortion-laws.html

(53) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3447789/Infographic-reveals-Brazil-
countries-Zika-virus-income-tourism-drop-53-2billion-single-year.html

(54) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/12/rio-olympics-zika-amir-attaran-public-
health-threat

322
Chapter 16 – COVID Vaccinations
and Oxitec’s “Flying Syringes”

Source

CHINESE ENGLISH SPANISH

Contents

16.1. ZIKA South America, 2015

16.2. ZIKA and Microcephaly

16.3. Oxitec’s Failures

16.4. Gain of Function Research

16.5. Oxitec Mosquito trials in Florida and California

16.6. Here Comes Doomsday

16.7. Concerns for Fertility. Is This About Sterilisation and Depopulation?

16.8. The Usual Group of Suspects, and a Few New Ones

16.9. Epilogue
323
This essay is going to ramble a bit because we need to build a framework of links as a
foundation for our main point. Some apparently disparate elements are closely
connected as part of a broader agenda, but we need first to identify the
relationships.

16.1. ZIKA South America, 2015

We begin with a brief review of ZIKA, this 2015 outbreak in South America of a
virus so mild that it had never done anything to anybody. ZIKA normally produces
symptoms such as a slight fever or conjunctivitis and sometimes joint pain, but typically
so mild that the symptoms last for only a few days and most people don’t even know they
have it. ZIKA is not contagious but is transmitted by mosquitoes, which means you
must be bitten by an infected mosquito to contract it.

Source

324
There is much about the ZIKA outbreak that is important to our story. You may
want to read my prior article on ZIKA to fully understand. (1) For now, we can note that
the outbreak was accompanied by an intense flood of carefully-organised media
propaganda with an astonishing amount of fear-mongering about a small number of
unrelated birth defects (microcephaly), leading to enormous pressure on Latin
American governments to eliminate their anti-abortion legislation. This appears to
have been the entire purpose of the media flood, and it was rather successful in that three
countries capitulated.

Perhaps the most important point is that there was never any explanation for
ZIKA’s sudden decision to travel more than 12,000 kilometers from Micronesia to
abruptly appear in Brazil, nor for its ability to almost instantaneously infect
countless millions of people in more than 20 countries covering nearly 20 million
square kilometers. The official WHO version was that ZIKA was “believed to have been
brought to Brazil by an infected visitor to the World Cup”, a statement that appeared
superficially credible but which constituted logical rubbish. There was no way that one or a
few infected travelers could have been bitten by hundreds of millions of local mosquitoes
who in turn became infected and then spread over 20 million square kilometers in a
month. In any case, ZIKA was in Brazil long before the World Cup.

There was one crucial fact that was heavily suppressed by the mass media: A UK company
named Oxitec had been conducting “trans-genic” mosquito trials in all these areas
immediately prior to the mass regional outbreak. The theory was to release billions of
sterile mosquitoes which would mate with the local species and produce sterile offspring,
thereby eradicating the local mosquito population. I will expand on this later, but Oxitec’s
“trials” all proved to have been failures, with no resultant reduction in local populations and
with a frightening gene transfer from the trans-genic insects to the local species. Since
ZIKA was not endemic to Brazil or indeed to South-Central America, it had to be
introduced from somewhere, and on a massive scale. In light of all the evidence,
the only possible conclusion was that Oxitec’s billions of mosquitoes were
knowingly infected with the ZIKA virus prior to release in South America. No other
conclusion is even slightly credible.

16.2. ZIKA and Microcephaly

325
The entire thrust of the vast media flood and the truly emphatic and frightening
fear-mongering were directed to the risk of a birth defect called microcephaly,
which was played up to a simply ridiculous extent and blamed on the ZIKA
virus. First, to put this into perspective, the number of microcephaly births in all of Latin
America was around 2,000 in a total population of about 650 million.

But the main point is that these birth defects occurred almost 100% in the precise
areas where spraying had been done with the insecticide pyroxiprophen (a
“hormone disruptor”), on the powerful recommendation of the WHO (who else?).
Further, these birth defects occurred immediately after the spraying and as much
as two years prior to the outbreak of ZIKA. On the basis of all the evidence, any
connection between ZIKA and microcephaly is fraudulent. My prior article mentioned above,
contains all the necessary references. This is important because the Western media are
now re-floating this theory to justify what will become a new flood of
vaccinations.

One article stated: “The evidence is now certain. After the suspicions that for months had
led the major organizations in the world to work to demonstrate the connection between
Zika and some malformations, we now have a scientific basis to confirm it: the virus causes
the rare birth defect, microcephaly, and other serious brain problems. The evidence was
published in the New England Journal of Medicine by CDC researchers, who made
a thorough review of the available scientific evidence related to the Zika virus and birth
defects.” (2) I cannot understand why even the scientific journals have become a
party to this fraud, because there has never been proven any connection between
ZIKA and birth defects, and no flavivirus has ever been implicated in such things.

The same article states further: “Surveys say a lot of people are not worried about Zika
virus infection in the United States [because] they don’t know much about it,” said Dr.
Sonja Rasmussen. About 700 people in the United States have been infected with the
Zika virus according to reports, including 69 pregnant women, Dr. Anne Schucat, deputy
director of the C.D.C., said at a White House briefing. About half of the cases are in
Puerto Rico . . . According to the most recent projections, mosquitoes that can transmit
the virus will be active in 30 U.S. states during the warmer months, a much wider range
than initially predicted by health officials.” (3)

16.3. Oxitec’s Failures

A Brain-Infecting Virus Carried by Mosquitoes Is Spreading Far and Wide This Year (2019). Source
326
It is important to draw attention to the fact that apparently all of Oxitec’s
mosquito trials have failed, many widely (and loudly) denounced as failures by
the local governments, but with this information blockaded by the Western
media.

Some trials produced a temporary drop in local mosquito populations, but which soon
recovered to prior levels. (4) (5) In one trial in Brazil in 2015 (the time of ZIKA)
Oxitec released around 500,000 mosquitoes every week for 27 weeks in one
city. The insects contained a gene modification that would supposedly prevent mosquitoes
from reaching the adult stage and thus being unable to reproduce, the dispersed insects
themselves predicted to die out in total. But the dispersed mosquitoes didn’t die out,
and their offspring did in fact reproduce. Moreover, researchers from Yale
University examined the mosquitoes and discovered that the ‘transgenic’ gene
alterations had unexpectedly migrated into the target population of local
mosquitoes. (6)

16.4. Gain of Function Research

Gain-of-function (GoF) uses genetic engineering to make a living organism more virulent. The
microorganisms studied are often viruses, bacteria, and other microorganisms. Source

But now things take a surprising turn. ZIKA didn’t disappear after South America; it
moved to the US where it was busily engaged in Gain of Function
327
research. Researchers at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology in San Diego,
recreated ZIKA in their labs and, using both cells and animals (and humans, from
what I understand), tried to learn what would happen when Zika was repeatedly
transmitted between different animal species as well as when repeatedly passed back and
forth from mosquito cells to mice. The virus naturally experienced mutations during
these procedures, which increased its ability to replicate, to perhaps bypass
natural immunity, and to become rather dangerous to humans. (7) (8)

This danger to humans of course will require vaccinations, most especially if expecting
mothers in the US and Europe can be frightened out of their wits with fears of microcephaly
as was done so successfully in South America. This wouldn’t normally matter to us because
ZIKA travelled from Polynesia only to South and Central America, and died there. ZIKA
has never existed in North America, so we needn’t be concerned.

16.5. Oxitec Mosquito trials in Florida and California

Source

Well, we needn’t be concerned, except for the fact that Oxitec has already been conducting
the same “trans-genic” mosquito trials in the US, beginning with Florida and California. And
lo and behold, ZIKA has suddenly been detected in both Florida and California,

328
where it will almost certainly exhibit the precise mutations discovered at the La
Jolla Institute in San Diego. Thus, all pregnant women can become terrified of the
prospect of their infants suffering from microcephaly and can all line up for yet
another vaccine – which, coincidentally, is already in production and trials. (9)

In early 2021, Oxitec had gained approval to release billions of its trans-genic
mosquitoes in Florida and California. (10) (11) In an article dated May 14, 2021, the
Scientific American (12) told us excitedly that the “First Genetically Modified
Mosquitoes Released in U.S. Are Hatching Now”. They tell us further that “Oxitec
overcame significant regulatory hurdles before getting the go-ahead from the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration in 2016 and then the Environmental Protection Agency in 2020. If
the current pilot effort is successful, the firm is set to release as many as 20
million more males in the prime of Florida’s mosquito season later this year.”
Scientific American’s final statement was that “The results of the experiment could
ultimately help address concerns about releasing genetically modified organisms into the
wild.” I fail to see how. If anything, this should alarm everyone.

It is disappointing that the Scientific America article is almost pure propaganda and replete
with misinformation and outright falsehoods. In one part, the article quotes a ‘scientist’ as
saying, “Oxitec’s technology for releasing genetically modified insects has been tested in
other places. [The company has] reported reaching A. aegypti population suppression of
more than 90 percent in many of their releases. . .” It is true that Oxitec’s technology
has been tested in other places, but none of those have been successful. The claim
that they have achieved a 90% suppression rate is an outright lie. There have been
a few examples of high suppression rates, but those were very short-lived and within a
year or so the mosquito populations were back to prior levels, and with a more immune
and genetically-altered species. Scientific American’s article is frighteningly
fraudulent.

16.6. Here Comes Doomsday

Source
329
This article isn’t really about ZIKA, and only peripherally about COVID-19. It’s about
something much more sinister, and it began long before either ZIKA or COVID-
19. It is about universal worldwide vaccinations. I would remind you here of the
quote by a Robert Kagan look-alike who stated that the only way to take full control
of the world’s populations would be to “line everyone up and give them a
vaccination.”

In 2008 the Gates Foundation arranged with Professor Hiroyuki Matsuoka of Jichi
Medical University in Japan to manufacture a revolutionary type of GM
mosquito. Through artificial genetic alterations, instead of infecting victims with
yellow fever or malaria, the insects would instead be made capable of
administering vaccines – as for COVID-19. Gates initially paid Professor
Hiroyuki $100,000 to begin this process, and offered $1,000,000 to any technician
successful in creating what he called “flying syringes“. Gates planned on mass-
producing these gene-therapy mosquitoes and distributing them worldwide. (13)
(14) (15) (16)

Anopheles stephensi – Wikipedia

PubMed ran an article on it: Abstract; 2010 Aug. (17) “We are producing a transgenic
mosquito, a flying syringe, to deliver a vaccine protein to human beings via the
saliva the mosquito deposits in the skin while biting. The mosquito produces a
vaccine protein in the salivary gland and deposits the protein into the host’s skin
when it takes the host’s blood. We allowed the CSP-expressing mosquitoes to
feed on mice to induce the production of anti-CSP antibody . . . Further techniques
and trials are required in order to realize vaccine-delivering mosquitoes.”

330
These people had a brilliant idea and the process was simple: “If we can infect billions
of mosquitoes with ZIKA, and have those billions of mosquitoes infect hundreds
of millions of people with ZIKA, why can’t we infect those same mosquitoes with
the spike protein from Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, and have the
mosquitoes give hundreds of millions of people a COVID vaccination?” Take that,
anti-vaxxers! An enormous plus is that this would be done in secrecy and informed consent
is unnecessary for mosquito bites.

Another huge plus is that the spike protein wouldn’t be stuck in the
musculature but would be injected directly into the blood vessels, thus having
transportation throughout the entire body and able to lodge wherever it could do the most
good – or the most harm, depending on which side of the fence you are sitting on.
An additional feature is that a denial would be the only defense necessary since proof
would be almost impossible to obtain.

The only negative feature is that mosquitoes, being the haphazard little creatures they are,
would bite people at random with no sense for equal distribution. This would mean that
some unlucky humans would be bitten rarely or not at all, while the very lucky might
receive 200 or more “booster shots”. Still, a small obstacle considering that we will have
many mosquito seasons to even out the ‘vaccinations’. Too good to be true, and very
cost-effective.

Initial results were unsatisfactory, but in a report on the Japanese study published in the
April 2015 issue of Insect Molecular Biology, the researchers added an antigen – a
compound that triggers an immune response – to the protein mix in the prototype
mosquito’s saliva, and apparently produced the desired results, that the mosquitoes
carrying the desired item (such as a spike protein) would indeed release it into
the victim while drawing blood, much as they might infect a person with ZIKA or
malaria. According to the report in Insect Molecular Biology, mice bitten by Hiroyuki’s
mosquitoes did indeed produce the desired antibodies in the victims. Science Now reported
the same successes.

They ran articles on this until 2015, then suddenly all the references
disappeared. The Press Release by Shigeto Yoshida from the Jichi Medical University in
Japan, that boasted of ‘success’, has been deleted from the Internet, and the published
reports up to 2020 and 2021 are now either deleted (“It seems you’re in search of a
page that doesn’t exist”), or “Access Forbidden”.

The studies published in Insect Molecular Biology and in Science Now, are unavailable. A
wall of secrecy has been built around this entire topic, and the mainstream media
(to the extent they touch this at all) now dismiss it as “An interesting proof of
principle that’s unlikely to be put into practice.” (18)

331
Thus, the case is closed and the entire topic has gone dark. I find this alarming because of
the eerie similarity to other such “discoveries” that have suffered a similar fate. In 2001
scientists at the Epicyte bio-lab in San Diego created a GM contraceptive corn,
having discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm. Their
researchers isolated the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies
and inserted them into corn plants, creating horticultural factories that make
contraceptives.

Shortly after the 2001 Epicyte press release, the company was taken over by Biolex and
all discussion of the breakthrough vanished. Nothing more was heard in any media
about the development of spermicidal corn. (19)

There is much more on this that you should read: (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26)

Source

Similarly, seed and bio-chemical companies were in the recent past suddenly
promoting the use of cotton seeds as a primary foodstuff for underdeveloped
countries. Cotton seeds are toxic, containing a chemical called gossypol which is
an effective male sterilant.[40] The seed companies claimed to have removed this
toxin to a safe level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very minute
doses taken repeatedly (as when used for a basic food) will render an entire male
population sterile. This ‘discovery’ and promotion also suddenly disappeared. NPR
produced an article on it about four years ago (27), but that seems to be the end.

332
16.7. Concerns for Fertility. Is This About Sterilisation and Depopulation?

The Deagel corporation is a minor branch of US military intelligence, one of the many secretive
organizations which collect data for high-level decision-making purposes and prepares confidential
briefing documents for agencies like the National Security Agency, the United Nations, and the World
Bank. This means its population predictions for 2025, as well as its industrial output predictions on a
nation-by-nation basis, are not mere fantasy but instead based on strategic assumptions which are
shared and well understood by other players in the intelligence community. Source

I think it is easy to become paranoid about the depopulation movement and begin
seeing things that aren’t there. But still, when we learn of a new GM seed or learn
of another WHO or other vaccination program (including that for COVID-19), it
just seems that much too often these have an “anti-fertility agenda” built into
them.

I have mentioned in several articles how the WHO, Bill

Gates, and Rothschild conspired to sterilise about 150 million women in
undeveloped countries without their knowledge or consent. (28) But the WHO
didn’t stop there. In 2015, the WHO decided to blanket Kenya with a new polio
vaccine – for no apparent purpose and with an odd stipulation of repeated vaccinations.

A Kenyan scientist, a Dr. Ngare, insisted on testing at least the initial shipment of
the WHO vaccines before any immunisation took place, and discovered the
vaccines contained estradiol, which is the major female sex hormone that
regulates the estrous and menstrual female reproductive cycles. Its presence
could render all females sterile and, when exposed to males as would be done
with a polio vaccine, has been proven to damage the testes and prevent the
creation of sperm.

The WHO apparently had no explanation for the presence of this hormone in a
polio vaccine, which would have acted to sterilise both men and women. (29)
333
You may be interested in this presentation on vaccines: (30) “Many of the
organisations that promote vaccine administration around the world are linked with
population control agendas says Dr. Sam Bailey, who in a short video highlights the history
of anti-fertility vaccines. Over her career and after much research Dr. Sam Bailey, a New
Zealand medical author and health educator, has discovered that the vaccine
model and Germ Theory itself has many flaws. “Today, we’re going to cover an
even shadier application of vaccines. That is the use of them to reduce fertility
and even cause permanent sterilisation,” Dr. Bailey said.

During her video she gave an overview of the philanthropical and health organisations that
have been experimenting on humans with “secret ingredient vaccines” beginning
with The Rockefeller Foundation which in its 1968 annual report, page 72, stated: “Very
little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce
fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found
here.” 1968 Rockefeller Foundation Annual Report.”

I don’t want to get into the COVID vaccines here because that is too large a topic. I will
deal with this in a separate article, but a few comments on fertility are appropriate. The
Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines likewise have caused concern about their
effects on female fertility, with quite a long list of reports of menstrual and other
reproductive disfunctions. The media quickly discounted all these as ‘temporary’ and of
no concern, but that was hardly comforting. The COVID vaccines seem to differ markedly
in their content, with some batches causing blood clots while others are related to a
wide variety of complaints, not all trivial. But Dr. Mike Yeadon, Professor Delores
Cahill, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Roger Hodkinson and many other competent
scientists noted that the spike protein from the mRNA vaccines tended to collect
in the ovaries and testes. They were unable to predict the precise effect of this, but
expressed extreme concern for the effects the mRNA vaccines could have on
fertility in both males and females.

And then we had the detailed article produced by the UK’s Daily Exposé which documented
a major study demonstrating that fertility decreases with the rate of vaccination of
women. (31) (32) In 2021, Professor Dr. Hervé Seligmann examined fertility in
countries that have high rates of Covid injection uptake compared to those that have
not. He concluded women’s fertility decreases the more women are vaccinated. Sir
John Bell is a Canadian immunologist and geneticist. From 2006 to 2011, he was President
of the UK’s Academy of Medical Sciences, and since 2002 he has held the Regius Chair of
Medicine at the University of Oxford. In an interview in 2020 on the UK Channel 4, Dr.
Bell said “These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilise a population. They
are very likely to have an effect which works in a percentage, say 60 or 70%.”

Dr. Seligmann’s study, “Female COVID19 vaccination associates with lower

fertility (Hervé Seligmann, 28IX2021, version 7)” (33) found that only Israel
continued to enjoy relatively high fertility despite the high percentage of
vaccinated women. He did not attempt to explain the reason for the Israeli anomaly
but Haim Yativ, Director of the Nakim Organization (34), said the abnormality in Israel

334
can be explained by the fact that Israel is “Pfizer’s laboratory state”, and that [Jewish
women in Israel] must have been given a high percentage of placebo vaccinations
to test the Covid injection results against them as a control group.

I have long held a suspicion that the mRNA vaccines have not been uniform throughout the
world, that different countries have received vaccines with different content. Certainly,
Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has exhibited a very wide range of side effects according to the
specific batch number, meaning that the batches were not at all the same. This is
actually an enormous concern because the production in volumes of hundreds of millions
or billions of doses of a vaccine is a very complex undertaking and, once up and running,
is a closed system, meaning that every dose must ‘by definition’ be identical to every other
dose. To produce batches with varying properties means to shut down the system,
introduce new contents, and restart. It cannot occur in any other way, and this means
that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has been stage-managed by batch, with no
information publicly available as to the actual contents of each batch. That’s not
comforting.

This is so true that there is a website named “How Bad is My Batch” dedicated to
Pfizer’s vaccine that permits visitors to track the side effects which vary widely
by batch. (35) Dr. Mike Yeadon stated flatly that “this is the calibration of a murder
weapon”. Strong words, perhaps, but he knows better than I.

In researching this topic, it seems that in every case after a disturbing new report the mass
media publish a quick whitewash and then we have a news blackout, a sudden total news
embargo on the topic. Since fertility is a concern to almost everyone, these media
blackouts cannot be random; they must be controlled from a central source. Given
the simultaneity and the universality of the information embargo, there is no other way to
account for it, and that means the usual group of suspects wants to avoid public speculation
and information on this topic as it relates to GM seed and vaccines. And now we have
the same with function-enhanced ZIKA and Oxitec’s “flying syringes” that Bill
Gates wants to distribute worldwide. Keep in mind that the entire media flood on the
original ZIKA outbreak was directed totally to free abortions and the avoidance
of pregnancy in Latin America.

16.8. The Usual Group of Suspects, and a Few New One

I think we can close with a brief examination of the participants in this vast enterprise to
gain an appreciation of the tight interweaving of the parts and to understand that this
is a tightly-held closed group.

These include the Rockefeller Institute, Bill Gates and his foundation, the WHO,
the World Bank, USAID and UNICEF. We have the Rothschilds and their Sanofi
hydra, Big Pharma and a list of private bio-tech companies, and secondary
suppliers like Monsanto, DuPont and Syngenta. But the same group also includes
335
a short list of private investment and financing companies, as well as the World
Economic Forum and, Surprise! the US and UK bio-weapons labs, plus
the CIA. They are all in this together and it is a far-ranging enterprise indeed, all directed
from a central source and all following the same agenda.

Oxitec, originally Oxford Insect Technologies, was founded in 2002 by Luke

Alphey, David Kelly and Paul Coleman. The three founders are no longer associated
with Oxitec. Alphey is now at the Pirbright Institute, one of the UK’s two infamous biological
weapons laboratories, where he works on “the emerging field of genetic pest
management, focusing particularly on mosquitoes”. (36) You would have to be very
naïve to believe that the UK’s Pirbright Institute is working on “pest management”. You
may be interested to know that Professor Alphey was selected as a “Technology
Pioneer” by Klaus Schwab‘s World Economic Forum in 2008, Oxitec also being heavily
praised by that same group. Both Professor Alphey and Pirbright have a long history
of weaponising insects and producing viral bio-weapons. Bulgarian
researcher Dilyana Gaytandzhieva documented bird and insect infections in
Ukraine, which would almost certainly have had participation from the UK at
either Pirbright or Porton Down. (37)

Source

It is more than interesting that this same group obtained in 2015 US patent number
8,967,029 B1 “Toxic Mosquito Aerial Release System,” whose purpose is to “disperse
infected mosquitos as a military weapon”. (38) As more than one researcher has
noted, “The curious aspect of this patent is that the inventor, S. Mill Calvert, and the
assignee, TMARS Associates, both of Manassas, Virginia, do not appear to exist . . .” This
was my experience as well, which means we are dealing with the alphabet
agencies, most likely the CIA.

336
You may be interested to know that the Pirbright Institute was an unheralded attendee
and participant at Event 201, the high-level pandemic exercise that described the outbreak
of COVID-19 in China as it was actually developing in the dark. One of the reasons for
Pirbright’s attendance is that this bio-weapons “Institute” holds many of the
patents on COVID-19.

Oxitec (our mosquito people) was named a World Economic Forum technology pioneer
in 2008 and has been recognised by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ‘Grand
Challenges for Global Health Initiative’. It was purchased by US-based Precigen and
is now owned by Third Security, who also owns 40% of Precigen. Third Security is a kind
of hedge fund with only 41 clients but more than $1 billion in assets under
management, these assets being the same biotechnology companies as above. This
company, and several like it, are funding agencies that gather money from the
Gates and Rockefeller Foundations, the Rothschilds, whomever, and funnel it into
whatever is on the current agenda.

Precigen is a US biotechnology company headquartered in Germantown,

Maryland. It “applies engineering to biological systems to enable DNA-based
control over the function and output of living cells”, and its focus is on “human
gene therapy” (such as Pfizer’s COVID vaccines). Monsanto, Syngenta, and the Gates
Foundation are investors. Given the connection between these above groups and the
bio-weapons labs like Pirbright, it isn’t a surprise that all of these “specialise in
controlling insect damage to crops”. Or causing it, depending on the task for the
day.

16.9. Epilogue

Bill Gates and Warren Buffett speak at Columbia Business School in January 2017. They are the two
of the three richest people in America. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images) Source

337
The transfer of ZIKA to the US and the subsequent gain of function research, then
Oxitec’s new “trans-genic” mosquito trials in the US, the sudden discovery of
ZIKA in the US and a vaccine already in the making, cannot be a coincidence. Nor
can the new media fear-mongering flood attempting to tie ZIKA to brain defects and thus
the need to avoid pregnancy or at least obtain yet another vaccine.

The connections between Oxitec, the Pirbright Institute, the weaponised insects,
Bill Gates’ “flying syringes”, the CIA and the WHO, similarly cannot be random
coincidences. The fact that all the members of this select group are devoted Malthusians
with an altogether unwarranted enthusiasm for sterilising or otherwise depopulating the
planet, is also not a source of comfort.

When I tie in Bill Gates’ Flying Syringes with Oxitec, ZIKA, and COVID-19, I arrive
at unpleasant conclusions, in large part because of the consistent media misinformation
and lies accompanying these topics. Perhaps even worse, the interconnected web of
individuals, companies and institutions involved in all these seemingly unrelated
parts, are an entirely untrustworthy lot who are all provably entwined in
worldwide depopulation efforts to be achieved by GM food and universal
vaccinations. And, given the media silence about the ‘flying syringes’, I have
grave forebodings about Oxitec’s mosquitoes in the US and cannot put out of my
mind a possible connection to COVID-19 vaccinations. The path seems too clear
to me.

I cannot predict the final outcome of this puzzle but I have a bad feeling that,
having progressed this far with the flying vaccinations, these people will not quit,
and that means perpetual “vaccinations by insect” that contain whatever our
would-be masters desire. I think we are doomed.

338
NOTES

(1) https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5811/

ZIKA

(2) https://www.corriere.it/salute/malattie_infettive/16_aprile_14/zika-conferma-
definitiva-usa-virus-causa-microcefalia-5505e798-0218-11e6-9f07-f0b626df35ca.shtml

Zika, the definitive confirmation from the USA: the virus causes microcephaly

(3) ibid

(4) https://www.acbio.org.za/oxitecs-failed-gm-mosquito-releases-worldwide-
forewarnings-africa-and-target-malaria-project

Oxitec’s failed GM mosquito releases worldwide: Forewarnings for Africa and the
Target Malaria project

(5) https://notaakhirzaman.com/9714/

Company set to release billions of GM mosquitoes in two US states (discusses the

failures)

(6) https://www.dw.com/en/genetically-modified-mosquitoes-breed-in-brazil/a-50414340

Genetically modified mosquitoes breed in Brazil

(7) https://www.corriere.it/salute/malattie_infettive/22_aprile_13/zika-virus-mutazione-
3edebc96-bb36-11ec-818b-cbb6b2b517fa.shtml

Zika, just a small mutation to make the virus more dangerous

(8) https://www.cell.com/cell-reports/fulltext/S2211-1247(22)00407-7

A Zika virus mutation enhances transmission potential and confers escape from
protective dengue virus immunity

339
Antigenic cross-reactivity between Zika and dengue viruses: is it time to develop
a universal vaccine?.

A live-attenuated Zika virus vaccine candidate induces sterilizing immunity in

mouse models.

(9) ibid

(10) https://jdfor2024.com/2022/03/florida-and-california-stop-release-of-billions-of-gm-
mosquitoes/

British-based Company Set to Release Billions of GM Mosquitoes in Two US States

(11) https://notaakhirzaman.com/9714/

British-based Company Set to Release Billions of GM Mosquitoes in Two US States

– The Expose

(12) https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/first-genetically-modified-mosquitoes-
released-in-u-s-are-hatching-now/

First Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Released in U.S. Are Hatching Now; May 14,
2021

(13) https://notaakhirzaman.com/9714/

British-Based Company to release billions of GM mosquitoes in the US

(14) https://www.technologyreview.com/2010/03/19/27843/mosquitoes-engineered-
into-flying-vaccinators/

Mosquitoes Engineered Into Flying Vaccinators

(15) https://www.foxnews.com/science/mosquitoes-turned-into-flying-vaccinators

Mosquitoes Turned into ‘Flying Vaccinators’

(16) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20337749/

Flying vaccinator; a transgenic mosquito delivers a Leishmania vaccine via blood

feeding

(17) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20802540/

Production of a transgenic mosquito expressing circumsporozoite protein, a

malarial protein, in the salivary gland of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae)

(18) https://www.technologyreview.com/2010/03/19/27843/mosquitoes-engineered-
into-flying-vaccinators/

Mosquitoes Engineered Into Flying Vaccinators

An interesting proof of principle that’s unlikely to be put into practice.

(19) https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/5760/

The Pleasures of Depopulating the Earth

340
(20) https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/genetically-modified-seeds-
conceived-as-a-weapon-part-iii-february-11-2020/

Genetically Modified Seeds: Conceived as a Weapon

(21) https://www.theguardian.com/science/2001/sep/09/gm.food

GM corn set to stop man spreading his seed; Sun 9 Sep 2001

(22) https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&addres
s=104×3738803

The Eco-Politics of Spermicidal, Genetically Engineered Corn

(23) https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_geneticfood99.htm

Spermicidal Breakfast Cereal

(24) https://canadianliberty.com/spermicidal-corn-and-other-biopharmaceutical-crops/

Spermicidal corn and other biopharmaceutical crops

(25) https://perfidiousalbinos.wordpress.com/2014/08/15/engineered-sterility/

Sterility Vaccines and Spermicidal Corn

(26) http://stopthelie.com/sterility-vaccines-and-spermicidal-corn.html

(27) https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2018/10/17/658221327/not-just-for-cows-
anymore-new-cottonseed-is-safe-for-people-to-eat

Not Just For Cows Anymore: New Cottonseed Is Safe For People To Eat

(28) https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/4879/

A Cautionary Tale About the WHO

(29) https://notaakhirzaman.com/9714/

Oxitec Mosquito Release in US

(30) https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/07/infertility-what-was-done-to-innocent-people/

Infertility: What Was Done to Innocent People with Secret Ingredients in “Vaccines”; BY
RHODA WILSON ON JANUARY 7, 2022

(31) https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/10/14/vaccine-induced-infertility-and-birth-defects-
taking-a-look-at-a-new-study-on-fertility-plus-pandemic-black-eyed-babies/

Vaccine-Induced Infertility and Birth Defects: Taking A Look at A New Study on

Fertility Plus Pandemic “Black-Eyed” Babies

(32) https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/study-concludes-womens-
fertility-harmed-in-vaccinating-countries/

Study concludes women’s fertility harmed in vaccinating countries

341
(33) https://dailyexpose.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Female-COVID19-vaccination-
associates-with-lower-fertility10-1.pdf

Female COVID19 vaccination associates with lower fertility

(34) https://www.nakim.org/

Nakim

(35) https://howbad.info/

How Bad is My Batch

(36) https://www.pirbright.ac.uk/users/prof-luke-alphey

Prof Luke Alphey; Group Leader

(37) https://dilyana.bg/

(38) https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/lawrence-sellin-exclusive-ukrainian-
biolabs-another-us-military-industrial-complex-money-scam-involving-bidens-biowarfare-
facilities/

Are the Ukrainian Biolabs Another US Military-Industrial-Complex Money Scam

Involving the Bidens or Biowarfare Facilities or Both?

342
By Larry Romanoff

ENGLISH ITALIANO PORTUGUESE SLOVENIAN

Take a moment to reflect on the events you have read about in these Chapters,
and see if you can distinguish any patterns.

First in your mind should be that the official stories presented in each case were founded
on so-called “facts” that could not possibly have been true. One or two “animal rights
activists” walked into a deadly-force military installation and stole “a few vials” of a
deadly pathogen and, with that tiny amount, infected millions of animals. Some scientists
apparently just poured a deadly pathogen down the drain and that “leaky drain” spread
across the entire country and infected millions of animals. ZIKA was brought to Brazil by
an infected traveler to the World Cup, was bitten by hundreds of millions of mosquitoes
who then flew thousands of kilometers, including across the Andes, covering about 20
million square kilometers and infecting millions of people in about 20 countries
in only a matter of weeks. Bird flu was spread throughout the entire US by wild birds
who don’t cover most of that area and who never mix with domestic poultry. Meningitis,
polio, EBOLA and AIDS just happened to appear in the precise places where the
WHO (or the US military) had conducted vaccination campaigns immediately
prior.

343
Then we have the denials which are also obviously false. American women dying of
leukemia and brain cancers were suffering from “housewife syndrome”. The
WHO “tetanus” vaccine did not contain the hCG hormone and the millions of miscarriages
and 150 million sterilisations were from “natural causes”. Agent Orange does not cause
birth defects; those stories are just “anti-Americanism”. The lab-created
mycoplasma does not cause birth defects, even though only Gulf War soldiers and their
children had the disease. Similarly, depleted uranium does not cause birth defects
either. The US did not spread biological-warfare pathogens on China, Cuba, Russia,
Ukraine, Japan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Libya or Yugoslavia.

Each example presented in this series contains the same fundamental flaws. A novel
pathogen appears to emerge suddenly and inexplicably, in a wide variety of
locations with no logical explanation as to how this might have happened. The
official story is clearly nonsense but the authorities stonewall and obfuscate, preventing
the release of any useful information. In lock-step, the mass media propagate only the
official story while dismissing all other scientific facts and opinions as “conspiracy
theories” and solidly trash the persons and reputations of those attempting to
shed light on the events or bring the truth into the open. In some of the events, the
official story changes many times as holes and inconsistencies are discovered.

We can be forgiven for cynicism and suspicion because we intuitively know that the stories
cannot be true. We know the authorities must be covering up the truth, lying to
us. We intuitively know that the mass media must be doing the same, that they either
344
know or strongly suspect, but will nevertheless circle the wagons and protect those
in power.

At the time of writing in early 2024, much of the world is suddenly

experiencing an outbreak of measles, of all things, and which is already being
subjected to a media flood suggesting grave seriousness and another pandemic
requiring vaccinations.

One hundred years ago, about one person in 1,000 might have died from measles, but
over the last 50 or 60 years this has decreased from 1/10th of a person to 1/000 of a
person today. In other words, approximately zero, with an infection rate roughly
equivalent. Yet recently one Canadian province with a population of about 15
million had screaming headlines recommending that “everyone” – all children and
adults – be vaccinated immediately because two cases appeared. One prominent
Canadian media source had five articles on measles on the same day, the usual
media flood just as with COVID and with the same dismal intent of frightening
the population into more unnecessary vaccines. There are only a few hundred cases
worldwide, but you need to ask yourself how it is possible that a strain of measles
would break out in 50 countries – suddenly and simultaneously. When I was a child,
everyone got the measles and we were immune forever. It was considered a nuisance
rather than a disease.

You need to ask yourself why, with effectively zero infection rates and very small
risk, especially among the adult population, we are being presented with yet
another “pandemic” and all urged to be vaccinated immediately.

At the risk of boring repetition, please keep in mind the signs that virtually dictate the
deliberate use of a biological pathogen:

1. Disease caused by an unusual, rare, or uncommon pathogen, or an unusual

strain of a common pathogen, indicating it was potentially genetically engineered

2. Lack of an epidemiological explanation, i.e., no clear idea of source or origin

3. Unusual presentation or manifestation of the disease, i.e., race-specific

4. Unusual geographic or seasonal distribution

5. Multiple epidemics. Simultaneous outbreaks at different locations with the same

organism

6. Reverse or simultaneous spread. Diseases typically occur first among a

susceptible animal population, then spread to humans. If these two are simultaneous
or if the human disease precedes animal infections, we can be suspicious

345
This may seem a surprising statement to make, but we are in a class war. Our own
governments are waging war on us, and they hold all the cards. Our so-called
democracies – “government by the people” is a hoax. We have no power but to
protest in the streets, and we now increasingly meet harshness and brutality in
doing so. For questioning and protesting against the official narratives of these and other
events, we risk fines, imprisonment, confiscation of property, freezing of our bank
accounts, unemployability and more.

The events I have described here, with the best evidence I have been able to
accumulate, are by no means the entire story. These form only one snapshot of
an entire landscape, one which contains many other scenes that are all related. If you
try, you may be able to connect many of these dots, all of which lead to a New
World Order dominated by fascist dictatorships. The signs are all there, and each
is inevitably accompanied by a new harsh and unforgiving nature of our authorities as well
as the compliance of the mass media and the methods by which they avoid the
facts and truths of events and condemn and ostracize all who disagree.

These include the promotional floods for LGBT+, the sexualisation of children, the
slow but assured destruction of the family, and much more. They include the WEF
and Klaus Schwab’s “having nothing and being happy”, eating insects and living
in 200-square foot homes. They include his ID-2030 by which our bank accounts
can be frozen on a whim if we (or our children or grandchildren) refuse to submit
to yet another dangerous mRNA vaccine or any other unwelcome instruction
coming from our masters. We will face jail time for insulting a person by using an
incorrect pronoun. We will, as is already proposed in some countries, be deprived
of our citizenship and deported for questioning aspects of Jewish history or
indeed even for anything that might be determined as “anti-Semitism. These have
already been proposed in Germany and the signs are leading to all European and
Western countries, Canada being in the lead in this regard.

There is much to ponder, in all this.

346
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 32 languages and his articles posted on
more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as
well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management
consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international
consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting
professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to
senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten
books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to
Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chapt. 2 — Dealing with
Demons).

His full archive can be seen at

https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ and https://www.moonofshanghai.com/

He can be contacted at:

[email protected]

347
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has

not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content

is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for

educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use

of this content.

Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2024

348
349
By

350