Design PAT GR 12 2025 Eng
Design PAT GR 12 2025 Eng
GUIDELINES FOR
PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASKS
GRADE 12
2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. TEACHER GUIDELINES 3
3. LEARNER GUIDELINES 35
4. LIST OF RESOURCES 43
5. CONCLUSION 43
1. INTRODUCTION
The 18 Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement subjects which contain a practical
component all include a practical assessment task (PAT). These subjects are:
A practical assessment task (PAT) mark is a compulsory component of the final promotion mark
for all candidates registered for subjects that have a practical component and counts 25%
(100 marks) of the end-of-year examination mark. The PAT is implemented across the first three
terms of the school year. This is broken down into different phases or a series of smaller activities
that make up the PAT. The PAT allows for learners to be assessed on a regular basis during the
school year and it also allows for the assessment of skills that cannot be assessed in a written
format, e.g. test or examination. It is therefore important that schools ensure that all learners
complete the practical assessment tasks within the stipulated period to ensure that learners are
resulted at the end of the school year. The planning and execution of the PAT differs from subject
to subject.
The PATs for Design will be showcased into a cohesive body of work that is seen in the context
of an exhibition environment. This Retrospective Exhibition therefore reflects the final PAT
assessment for each learner in the country.
2. TEACHER GUIDELINES
Design teachers will set their own PATs. The creative nature of Design encourages
teachers to develop themes relevant to their specific contexts. These themes will then
determine specific briefs to be completed by the learners for each PAT.
Teachers must design TWO separate practical assessment tasks that are undertaken
during the academic year (Terms 1 to 2). Term 3 will be used to complete Topic 1
(sourcebook/process work) of the Final Practical Examination (Paper 2).
Marks for each PAT should be allocated as follows:
Topic 1: The Process (100 marks)
Topic 2: The Product (100 marks)
Choosing themes for the PATs:
o Teachers should choose themes to guide their briefs (e.g. if the theme is 'Improved
Living', a brief could focus on finding a variety of solutions to improve living).
o Teachers may develop their own themes and/or choose them from the approved
textbooks.
o Teachers may decide on a broad theme for the annual practical work and then
subdivide them into specific briefs, one per term. This will result in a more coherent
body of work in the Retrospective Exhibition.
The teacher should ensure that at least 60% of each PAT is done in class under supervision,
as the teacher has to authenticate the work as the learner's own work. If the teacher cannot
authenticate the work, it should NOT be marked.
The PATs should be set in accordance with the context of the school. Teachers should give
specific instructions in the brief to set the requirements for the PAT.
PAT 1 Topic 1 and PAT 2 Topic 1 should include a 'Design in a Business Context' research
section.
The content of this Business Context research in each Topic 1 task should include some
or all of the content below.
Define your target market. Explain why you have chosen it.
Discuss the trends that have influenced you.
An appropriate local or international case study.
Visual merchandising of your product.
Explain how you would market this product. Create ONE of the following marketing forms:
business card, flier, poster, advert for local newspaper, Facebook page, etc.
List all the materials you required, the name and contact details of your suppliers and write
up the costs of all your materials. Also work out potential other costs, such as electricity,
etc.
Possible competitors: describe their products and why you consider them to be competitors.
Research potential markets for your products.
Research potential funding options for your business.
Investigate tertiary and career opportunities in your design product choice: range, scope,
training needed and training available.
How would you package and/or advertise your product or service to your intended target
market?
At the end of Grade 12, learners must present a PAT exhibition of their work as part of their
examination mark. This exhibition must show substantial evidence of the learners' practical
design development (concept, innovation, process, technical skills, an understanding of
design in a business context and applied theoretical knowledge). The PAT is developed
over a period of time during Terms 1, 2 and 3. The exhibition should be entirely the learners'
own effort.
Learners must concentrate on/demonstrate their entrepreneurial skills and promote their
own products (merchandising).
Design products and solutions must link to each other, which should afford the viewer a
much broader overview of the learners' abilities, and it should be an opportunity for the
school and parent community to view their work.
The sourcebooks must be available at the Retrospective Exhibition for markers to view in
order to understand the intention of each product, as evidence of originality and to see the
level of planning involved in the creation of the product.
An example of a poorly
designed exhibition space,
where little to no consideration
is given to the display of the
Grade 12 Design PATs and the
Grade 11 PATs.
2.5 Ideas and approaches to use in the development of the PAT briefs
The Design teacher should guide the creative process from start to finish.
Teachers are advised to choose themes relevant to the context of the learners and the time in
which we live. The theme should be carefully considered in order to ensure that the learners are
not disadvantaged in any way. The theme will then determine the requirements of the brief.
Clear criteria and instructions should include and consider the following:
This brief should be discussed and debated by the teacher and learners for a better
understanding of the intended design outcome.
Help the learner to find their own creative voice during the design process.
Learners should start by noting or illustrating all possible ideas, activities, issues, etc.
relating to the theme, i.e. in a mind map, photo journal, collage, etc.
It is important to emphasise that the purpose of almost any design is to add value to life and
the world we find ourselves in.
While learners are gathering ideas, try to lead their thought processes to those that are
personal, unusual, innovative and challenging and fill them with passion. Try to lead them
to individual and innovative approaches.
When evaluating ideas with the learners, eliminate ideas that are 'kitsch' (e.g. the obviously
borrowed ideas like a 'flower lamp'), insincere (e.g. world peace poster) or overtly pretty and
lacking in substance or function (e.g. a glitter book cover).
Encourage learners to source quality imagery. Discourage the use of already existing
photographs and designs. It is preferable to explore a topic first-hand (use own photographs
or direct observational drawings) as many images taken from the internet are generic and
of poor quality.
Help them to develop as effective, independent learners and as critical, reflective thinkers
with enquiring minds.
Ensure the extensive use of drawing to express perception and innovation, to communicate
ideas in a skilled way and to describe/illustrate concept development.
A mind map is a good tool for coming up with ideas that are connected to a central theme.
The end result of mapping should be a web-like structure of words and ideas or even images.
Draw additional branches that extend from the main branches. The words on these branches
are subtopics of the words you wrote on the main branches.
Keep expanding the mind map outwards with additional subtopics/keywords and branches.
Useful website: http://blog.iqmatrix.com/how-to-mind-map.
TIP:
It is sometimes a good idea to give the brief just after an activity like the one shown below. This
will assist learners to generate ideas.
Topic 1 could consist of a series of 'building blocks' given at consecutive times to ensure
experimentation and the development of the process. With careful planning, the teacher will
know where these 'building blocks' will lead the learners. Learners might not know where it is
leading to, creating constant aspects of surprise. It also combats the tendency that learners get
stuck on a first idea, without really experimenting and researching other possibilities.
Furthermore, the process or workbook will be almost completed before the making of the final
product.
Theme: Movement
Below are examples of a few activities that will help learners to generate ideas and
develop 'building blocks' using the theme of movement before handing out the brief.
Experimentation:
Guide learners to experiment with media and processes, to produce trial examples,
prototypes and mood boards or colour charts.
Exploring should be purposeful and relevant to the design solution.
Drawing skills:
The development of drawing skills should be evident. A variety of solutions to the brief should be
explored through the use of drawings (thumbnails, idea/conceptual, technical/construction and
observation).
During the course of the year this exploratory process should reflect the use of different drawing
materials (e.g. erasers, pens, ink, bleach, string and wire) and a wide range of drawing techniques
(e.g. stippling, hatching, doodling, scribbling, tonal drawing) and styles (naturalistic, expressive,
gestural) should be explored. This process should be creatively presented and annotated.
Experimental
ballpoint pen
drawings
Recommended rubrics to be used during the assessment of PAT 1 (Term 1) and PAT 2
(Term 2) as well as for the Retrospective Exhibition:
TOPIC 1:
MARKS
DESIGN PROCESS (sourcebook) DESCRIPTION
(100)
CRITERIA
Concept development Expression of intention and rationale/concept:
Brainstorm or do a mind map of ideas to
explore the theme and the intention of the
brief.
Research the brief and find relevant
source materials (visual references,
designers/movements who inspired the
learner, techniques, etc.).
20
Reference images linking/relating to the
theme.
Develop a concept demonstrating critical
thinking and creativity.
State intention/rationale, validating the
design solution found. How does your
design contribute to the current issues
and society?
Exploration and experimentation Evidence of research, experimentation and
reflection:
Show evidence of research by completing
a few thumbnail sketches of ideas.
Design a few different solutions that
explore the brief.
Evidence of experimentation, e.g. a mood
board, should be visible.
Exploration of different style movements.
Exploration of different materials and 20
techniques.
Application of different media and ideas
can be combined where possible.
(Creativity)
Continuous reflection on the process must
be evident. (Critical thinking)
Practise and improve your drawing
technique and skill by redrawing parts that
you struggle with.
TOPIC 2:
MARKS
DESIGN PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
(100)
CRITERIA
Creativity/Originality/Interpretation Is the work unique, original and relevant to
20
the brief?
Evidence of design involvement Overall impression. How have the
elements and principles been used to 20
create a unique design solution?
Technique/Craftsmanship/Method How technically competent is the final
product? Is the craftsmanship adequate 20
and professional?
Time management Evidence and utilisation of available time to
complete the product. Does the design
20
product show legitimate involvement in the
making of the design product?
Professional presentation and Does the product fulfil its function? Is the
functionality product presented professionally and
20
neatly? Does the product solution work in
relation to the brief?
TOTAL 100
This taxonomy should be used in conjunction with the assessment criteria for PAT 1
(Term 1) and PAT 2 (Term 2).
EXAMPLE:
Outstanding 90–100 Exceptional ability; richness; insightful; fluent; high skill; observation and knowledge
powerfully expressed; supported by an original or unusual process and design solution.
Outstanding and original presentation of the process and the product.
Excellent 80–89 Striking impact; most of the above; detailed; well organised and coherent; polished; skill
evident; supported by an original/unusual/relevant design process and solution; presentation
original and considered. Some minor flaws evident.
Very good 70–79 Well organised, as above, but lacks the impact; good level of competence and selection of
content; supported by a relevant design process and solution; obvious care and effort taken
with original presentation. Some obvious inconsistencies/flaws evident.
Good 60–69 Interesting presentation; clear intent; convincing; simple direct use of chosen medium;
displays understanding but tends towards the pedestrian and stereotyped response at times;
adequate design process and solution; reasonable effort taken with presentation.
Distracting/Obvious inconsistencies.
Average 50–59 Adequate; feels mechanical; derivative or copied; little insight; unimaginative; design process
and solution not always clearly identified; fair presentation. Many distracting
inconsistencies.
Below average 40–49 Enough work to pass; not logically constructed: some flashes of insight; limited selection of
information; poor technical skills might be a contributing factor; no real design process and
solution; clumsy or careless presentation. In need of support/motivation to pass.
Weak 30–39 Visually uninteresting; uncreative; limited/poor technical skill used; little attempt to present
information in an acceptable manner; little or no design process and solution; general lack of
commitment. In need of support/motivation to pass.
Very weak 20–29 Very little information or irrelevant work/design process and solution. No effort made to
Fail present work in an acceptable manner. General lack of commitment and technical skill.
Unacceptable 0–19 Incoherent; irrelevant, very little or no work; lack of even limited skills being applied. No
Fail commitment and technical skill.
This moderation tool is strictly for the purpose of moderation. The PATs should be both internally
and externally moderated. All schools will be notified by the provincial education department
(PED) indicating the date, time and venue for the external moderation of the PATs and
examination work.
NAME OF CANDIDATE
EXAMINATION NUMBER
CENTRE NUMBER
Date: Date:
Signature: Signature:
50%–59% Average creativity/ Lacks design Satisfactory Average management/ Satisfactory design
originality/ involvement in each technique/ evidence of process and solution
5. Average. Satisfactory interpretation in PAT. Evidence of craftsmanship/ progressive design that show reasonable
presentation that feels terms of the concept planning and method/competence development in effort taken with the
mechanical, derivative or and solutions appropriate use of utilised in presenting a presentation and
copied with little insight that is relevant to the design elements, presenting the satisfactory body of functionality of the
unimaginative. The design PATs. principles and exhibition with some work that has exhibition to the viewer.
process and solutions are not materials in flaws. inconsistencies. ALL The exhibition reads as
always clearly identified. presenting each PATs are complete a satisfactory cohesive
Satisfactory level of PAT. with some body of work.
competence and selection of inconsistencies.
content. Satisfactory
organisation and coherent
body of work; skill is evident;
supported by original/unusual/
relevant design solutions;
presentation original and
considered.
Many distracting
inconsistencies.
40%–49% Minimal Lacks design Minimal technique/ Below average Minimal design process
creativity/originality/ involvement in each craftsmanship/ management/ and solution that show
6. Below average. Clumsy or interpretation in PAT. Evidence of method/competence evidence of design minimal effort taken with
careless in presentation. The terms of the concept minimal planning utilised in development in the presentation and
learner has done enough work and solutions and use of design presenting the presenting an average functionality of the
to pass with an exhibition that relevant to the elements, principles exhibition that body of work that has exhibition to the viewer.
is not logically constructed. PATs. and materials in shows flaws. many inconsistencies. The exhibition reads as
The exhibition showcases presenting each PATs are incomplete a satisfactory body of
some flashes of insight, limited PAT. with major work that shows minimal
selection of information, poor inconsistencies. effort.
technical skills with limited
design processes and
solutions. Minimum level of
competence and selection of
content; supported by a
relevant design process and
solution; little care and effort
taken with some presentation.
In need of support/motivation
to pass.
30%–39% Very little sign of Lacks design Poor technique/ Weak management/ Limited design
creativity/originality/ involvement in each craftsmanship/ evidence of processes and solutions
7. Weak. Visually uninteresting interpretation in PAT. Evidence of method/ progressive design that show little care
presentation that lacks terms of the concept poor planning and competence utilised development in taken with the
creativity with limited/poor and solutions use of design in presenting the presenting a poor presentation and
technical skill. There is little relevant to the elements, principles exhibition that body of work that has functionality of the
attempt to present information PATs. and materials in shows major flaws. many inconsistencies. exhibition to the viewer.
in an acceptable manner with presenting each PATs are incomplete The exhibition
little or no design processes PAT. with some work showcases a poor body
and solutions. It shows a missing. of work that shows
general lack of commitment minimal effort.
and skill. Poor level of
competence and selection of
content; supported by a weak
design process and solution;
little care and effort taken for
the exhibition. Poor
organisation and skill are
evident; supported by poor
design solutions; presentation
is not well considered. In need
of support/motivation to pass.
20%–29% Very little sign of Lacks design Weak technique/ Incomplete and poor Very little effort taken
creativity/originality/ involvement in each craftsmanship/ time management that with presentation and
8. Very weak, FAIL. Very little interpretation in PAT. Evidence of method/competence shows little evidence functionality of the
information or irrelevant work/ terms of the concept weak planning and utilised in of progressive design exhibition to the viewer.
design process and solution. and solutions use of design presenting the development in The exhibition
No effort made to present work relevant to the elements, principles exhibition that presenting a weak showcases a weak body
in an acceptable manner. PATs. and materials in shows major flaws. body of work that has of work that shows
Weak level of competence and presenting each too many minimal effort.
selection of content; little care PAT. inconsistencies.
and effort taken with little PATs are incomplete
presentation. Poor organisation with some tasks not
and skill are evident; supported being done or missing.
by weak design solutions;
presentation is not well
considered. General lack of
commitment and technical skill.
0%–19% No sign of Very little/no design Weak technique/ Incomplete PATs and Very little/no effort taken
creativity/originality/ involvement in each craftsmanship/ poor time with presentation and
9. Unacceptable, FAIL. interpretation in PAT. Almost no sign method/competence management that functionality of the
Incoherent; irrelevant, very little terms of the concept of planning and very utilised in shows little/no exhibition to the viewer.
or no work; limited skills being and solutions weak use of design presenting the evidence of The exhibition
applied. No commitment and relevant to the elements, principles exhibition that progressive design showcases a weak body
technical skill. Weak level of PATs. and materials in shows major flaws. development in of work that shows
competence and selection of presenting each presenting a very no/minimal effort.
content; no care and effort PAT. weak body of work.
taken with weak/no
presentation. Very poor
organisation and skill;
supported by weak design
solutions; presentation is not
well considered.
RETROSPECTIVE
EXHIBITION
TOTAL: 100 marks 20 marks 20 marks 20 marks 20 marks 20 marks
NAME OF CANDIDATE
EXAMINATION NUMBER
CENTRE NUMBER
TEACHER'S MARK PANEL MARK MODERATED MARK
RETROSPECTIVE
EXHIBITION
3. LEARNER GUIDELINES
All design processes are to be completed using industry-standard software packages, such
as Adobe Creative Suite (Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Adobe Premier) or Coral Draw.
NO APPLICATION(APPS)-BASED programs, such as Canva, with 3D-rendering filters
are allowed.
FOR EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT, all digital design products can be printed for submission.
The digital version must also be submitted in the file extension of the software program used
to create the design product. In the event of an animation/video, the timeline must be clearly
visible.
NOTE: ALL candidates are required to submit a digital file with the layered version of the
product as well as a flattened version (JPEG or MP4). This file must be uploaded onto
a CD/USB/WeTransfer upload, Dropbox upload or Google Drive link made available
for submission. The Design subject teacher is required to refer to the PED
GUIDELINES and the Design Rubric for both the PATs and Exhibition in capturing
relevant information in the event of online moderation.
3.3 Tasks
These practical tasks will allow you to demonstrate your technical and problem-solving skills and
show evidence of innovative thinking and insight. On the next page is a guideline of some
approaches you may adopt.
It is important to develop your particular strengths. Some of you will be careful planners,
while others work more intuitively.
You should be a confident risk-taker. Try out new ideas and processes without fear of failure.
Creative activity may take place at a number of different levels, from producing a collage or
product inspired by an existing idea or design, to developing an entirely fresh and
individualised process and outcome. An idea is only as good as its execution. Technically
inferior work will ruin a good idea.
A design is first and foremost an expression of its medium. In all great designs, the subject
and the means by which it is rendered are inseparable. You should master technique to
protect its content.
Consider the purposeful use of the elements and principles in your design process.
Discuss your body of work continuously with the teacher. It will help you to identify your
strengths and weaknesses.
TOPIC 1 (Sourcebook)
Clearly write your name and surname on the front cover of your sourcebook.
Label each PAT clearly.
Paste in your brief for each PAT.
Your sourcebook should reflect activities chronologically.
Paste all work securely in your sourcebook.
Present your work in your sourcebook neatly and creatively.
Ensure that this document/sourcebook opens easily.
TOPIC 2 (Product)
CHECKLIST: TOPIC 2:
LIST Y N
Cover page
Brief
Term work schedule with due dates
Table of contents/Index
Rationale/Statement of intent
Brainstorm/Mind map
Influences/Inspiration
Mood board
Thumbnail sketches (at least FIVE to EIGHT various design ideas) with
annotations
THREE to FIVE concept drawings – more detailed than the thumbnail
drawings, with annotations explaining the ideas
THREE to FOUR experimental drawings on the final concept, with
annotations
Detailed final drawing (tonal, isometric, perspectival) with different views
and where necessary, with annotations
Business in Context: 1½ to 2 pages – SWOT, target market, production and
material cost analysis, marketing plan
Reflection (1 page) – What were the successes and failures?
Recording the Design Production – PICTURES – SIX to EIGHT pictures
using a cellphone
All PATs are to be completed according to the specified date of the brief. Failure to complete the
PATs could result in an incomplete SBA mark. This will severely compromise your final matric
result.
The absence of ANY PAT without submitting a doctor's certificate will result in an incomplete
mark. At least 60% of ALL tasks MUST be done in class, under supervision of your teacher. Your
teacher has to authenticate the work as your own. When your work is done at home, your teacher
cannot declare authenticity and the work will NOT be marked.
Refer to ANNEXURE A.
4. LIST OF RESOURCES
The teacher should have the following resource materials in the classroom:
Useful websites:
www.behance.com
www.pinterest.com
www.yatzer.com
www.dezeen.com
www.itsnicethat.com
www.underconsideration.com/fpo
www.ineedaguide.blogspot.com
www.lostateminor.com
www.coutequecoute.blogspot.com
www.antwerp-fashion.be
www.logopond.com
www.thedieline.com
www.designtimes.co.za/search
https://zapier.com/blog/mind-mapping-tutorial/http://lifehacker.com/how-to-use-mind-maps-
to-unleash-your-brains-creativity-1348869811
https://www.sdate.edu/sites/default/files/2017-07/service_learning_reflection_hand-out.pdf
https://qqq.thegraphicdesignschool.com/blog/mind-maps-for-graphic-design-ideas-
generation-techniques
https://www.illumine.co.uk/resources/mind-mapping/using-mind-maps-effectively/mind-
mapping-for-creativity-and-creative-problem-solving/
5. CONCLUSION
On completion of the practical assessment task learners should be able to demonstrate their
understanding of the industry, enhance their knowledge, skills, values and reasoning abilities,
as well as establish connections to life outside the classroom and address real-world challenges.
Furthermore, the PAT develops learners' life skills and provides opportunities for learners to
engage in their own learning.
ANNEXURE A
DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY
This is to declare that at least 60% of this PAT was done under the supervision of the Design teacher.
This declaration certifies that all work submitted is original and the work of the learner.
Learner
School
District
SIGNATURE DATE
Learner
Teacher
Principal
SCHOOL STAMP
ANNEXURE B
CANDIDATE՛ S
TOTAL MARKS
WEIGHTING %
OUTCOMES
CRITERIA
MARKER 3
MARKER 1
MARKER 2
AGREED
MARK
Outstanding Proficient Satisfactory Limited
(9–10 marks) (7–8 marks) (5–6 marks) (1–4 marks)
is highly creative, is creative and organised, is adequate, showing some is minimal, lacking creativity,
comprehensive and well- showing a good creativity and organisation organisation or relevance to
organised, demonstrating understanding of the theme. with a basic connection to the the theme.
deep understanding and The concept plan is well- theme. The concept plan is
rationale
alignment with the theme of developed and relevant, with The concept plan is underdeveloped or unclear,
the brief. a clear and well-reasoned somewhat developed, with a with a weak or insufficiently
rationale that effectively general rationale that justified rationale that poorly
10
The concept plan is well-
SOURCEBOOK/WORKBOOK
developed, innovative and supports the solution. moderately supports the supports the solution.
clearly articulated, with a solution.
compelling and thoroughly
DESIGN PROCESS
Research is thorough and Research is good and Research is basic, with some Research is minimal or lacks
highly relevant to the brief. relevant to the brief. relevant materials and relevance to the brief.
Evidence of research and
Clear evidence of extensive The mood board and sources. Mood board and thumbnail
research is presented through thumbnail sketches Mood board and thumbnail sketches are missing or
experimentation
a well-curated mood board demonstrate clear evidence sketches are included, but poorly executed.
and multiple thumbnail of research and a good may lack depth in exploration. Concept solutions are
sketches that explore various exploration of ideas. Concept solutions are underdeveloped and
ideas. Concept solutions are solid, present, but experimentation experimentation is absent or 10
Several concept solutions are with evidence of is limited or not fully superficial.
developed with strong experimentation that clearly developed.
evidence of experimentation, explores the brief.
showing a deep
understanding of the project's
objectives.
CANDIDATE՛ S
TOTAL MARKS
WEIGHTING %
OUTCOMES
CRITERIA
MARKER 1
MARKER 2
MARKER 3
AGREED
MARK
Outstanding Proficient Satisfactory Limited
(9–10 marks) (7–8 marks) (5–6 marks) (1–4 marks)
Generative drawings explore Generative drawings explore a Generative drawings explore Generative drawings are
a wide variety of creative good variety of solutions to the a limited variety of solutions, minimal, using few techniques
Detailed planning
solutions to the brief, using brief, using different using some techniques and and materials.
different techniques and techniques and materials. materials. Drawing skills development is
materials. Drawing skills development is Drawing skills development unclear or underdeveloped.
Drawing skills development evident, with some is evident, but the 10
is evident, with a clear progression in the refinement progression may be minimal
progression from initial of ideas. or uneven.
sketches to more refined and
SOURCEBOOK/WORKBOOK
detailed solutions.
Clear evidence of the final Evidence of the final design Final design solution is Final design solution is
DESIGN PROCESS
design solution in the form of solution is present in the form presented in the form of a underdeveloped or missing.
development and
reflection
considered, highly creative, creative, with a clear visual some attention to layout and little attention to layout,
and aesthetically pleasing, flow. structure. structure or design.
with a clear and coherent Attention to detail is evident in The visual flow is somewhat The visual flow is unclear and
visual flow. the layout, structure and clear, but the overall design the overall presentation lacks
10
Great attention to detail has design. lacks refinement. polish.
been paid to layout, structure
and overall design.
SOURCEBOOK/WORKBOOK TOTAL: 50
CANDIDATE՛ S
WEIGHTING %
OUTCOMES
CRITERIA
MARKER 1
MARKER 2
MARKER 3
AGREED
MARKS
TOTAL
MARK
Outstanding Proficient Satisfactory Limited
(9–10 marks) (7–8 marks) (5–6 marks) (1–4 marks)
The work is highly unique, The work is original and The work shows some The work lacks originality and
original and directly relevant to relevant to the brief, with a originality, but lacks full does not fully address the
Interpretation
Originality/
the brief. solid solution that addresses relevance to the brief. problem posed by the brief.
Creativity/
The solution effectively the problem. The solution addresses the The solution is generic or
addresses the problem posed The approach shows problem in a basic way, with inadequate in its approach. 10
by the brief with innovative creativity, but may lack some minimal creative input.
ideas and a clear creative innovation.
approach.
The work is highly unique, The work is original and The work shows some The work lacks originality and
original and directly relevant to relevant to the brief, with a originality, but lacks full does not fully address the
involvement
Evidence of
the brief. solid solution that addresses relevance to the brief. problem posed by the brief.
design
The solution effectively the problem. The solution addresses the The solution is generic or
DESIGN PRODUCTION
The approach shows problem in a basic way, with inadequate in its approach. 10
THE FINAL PRODUCT
The final product is highly The final product is The final product shows basic The final product lacks
Craftsmanship/
competent technically, technically competent, with technical competence and technical competence or
Technique/
Methods used are Methods are appropriate, Some methods used are less The methods used are
and the product is well- professional, or the product inappropriate and the product 10
professional and the product
is refined with attention to made, but may lack some lacks refinement. is poorly made.
detail. refinement.
Clear evidence of significant Evidence of good time Some evidence of time Little or no evidence of time
time investment and management and invested in the making of the investment in the making of
24 hours of work
the product. the product. The design solution may lack The design solution is
The design solution The design solution shows development or show signs of underdeveloped and there is
clear progress, but may lack limited involvement in the insufficient evidence of the 10
demonstrates an appropriate
and legitimate use of time, some depth or complexity. process. work process.
with evidence of thoughtful
development.
CANDIDATE՛ S
WEIGHTING %
OUTCOMES
CRITERIA
MARKER 1
MARKER 2
MARKER 3
AGREED
MARKS
TOTAL
MARK
Outstanding Proficient Satisfactory Limited
(9–10 marks) (7–8 marks) (5–6 marks) (1–4 marks)
The product is presented The product is presented The product is presented The product is poorly
DESIGN PRODUCTION
professionally and neatly, neatly and functions well. adequately, but there may be presented, with functional or
THE FINAL PRODUCT
fulfilling its function with Reflection on the design some issues with aesthetic issues.
functionality and
attention to detail. solution is present, but may presentation or functionality. Little to no reflection is
presentation,
Professional
reflection
The reflection on the design lack depth or critical analysis Reflection is present, but is provided or the reflection
TOPIC 2
solution is thorough, showing of how it relates to the brief. minimal or lacks focus on the lacks relevance to the brief.
critical analysis of the brief. 10
product in relation to the
brief.
Copyright reserved