Curtis2021Nation CCBYNCND
Curtis2021Nation CCBYNCND
1 Introduction
especially the Vietnam War, in the twentieth century. This chapter will detail
the NOI’s origins and development, paying attention to important charismatic
figures such as Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali. It will then outline its religious
teachings and practices. Finally, it will detail the split of the movement into
two main branches after the death of leader Elijah Muhammad in 1975; one led
by W.D. Mohammed and the other led by Louis Farrakhan.
he met Fard. After Fard left in 1934, Elijah Muhammad not only faced competi-
tion for the leadership of the movement but also ran afoul of federal authori-
ties (Curtis 2002: 63–84).
Like many African American leaders of both traditional and new religious
movements, Elijah Muhammad was investigated by the US Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) for sedition. For FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, almost any
agitation for equal rights was seen as potentially seditious. But Hoover was
especially concerned about the advocacy of many new religious movement
leaders such as Mittie Maud Lena Gordon on behalf of the Empire of Japan.
Elijah Muhammad was also implicated as a possible ally of the Japanese,
whom he considered to be fellow people of color. But the government man-
aged to convict him only of draft evasion, not sedition (Curtis 2013).
As he served time in a federal penitentiary from 1943 to 1946, his spouse,
Clara Muhammad, is credited with keeping the movement’s members con-
nected to its leader and to keeping the movement alive. It was after Elijah
Muhammad emerged from prison that the movement distinguished itself
from the dozens of Islamic groups and new religious movements seeking the
patronage of African Americans. As the United States emerged as a predom-
inant global power that advocated freedom of religion and speech and eco-
nomic opportunity in its Cold War with the Soviet Union, the NOI attempted
to expose the white supremacist social system that used both legal and extra-
legal means to insure the second-class citizenship of Black people in the United
States. Elijah Muhammad criticised African American civil rights leaders say-
ing that their advocacy of racial integration would not correct the problem,
and he advocated instead religious and political separatism. He instructed his
followers to avoid service in the US military and he told them not to vote in
elections. As one of the chief US critics the civil rights movement in the late
1950s and early 1960s, Elijah Muhammad did not share Martin Luther King Jr.’s
dream of racial brotherhood with the people whom he called “blue-eyed dev-
ils.” Instead, Elijah Muhammad dreamed of racial justice, which he said would
come when God would send fire and brimstone to destroy white America in
an imminent racial apocalypse. Since God would eventually see justice done,
Elijah Muhammad taught, it was not the job of his followers to stage a violent
revolution against white America. He told them to obey US laws unless they
conflicted with their freedom to practice their religion. Though the NOI advo-
cated self-defense, the movement did not advocate aggressive violence and it
did utilise the US courts to defend its religious liberty, especially the rights of
Muslim prisoners to practice Islam (Curtis 2002: 63–84).
This lack of a direct challenge to the US political system and white neoco-
lonialism more generally was a frustration for Malcolm X (1922–1965), Elijah
Public figures such as Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali helped to produce popu-
lar, scholarly, media, and governmental images of the NOI as a radical political
group. And NOI made a significant political impact in postwar US history. But
such images often cloud or even overshadow the strongly religious character
of a movement that rested on clearly articulated religious doctrines, a charis-
matic prophet, religious ethics, a system of rituals, and a vibrant material reli-
gious culture. Examining these religious elements and how they intersected
with or were coterminous with the movement’s politics are essential to under-
standing why the NOI worked as a mass movement. The NOI offered its follow-
ers meaning and purpose and a clear path toward religious liberation.
The first step toward this liberation, Elijah Muhammad taught, was knowl-
edge of self; the real history of Black man that white people had suppressed.
Many members who converted to the NOI said and wrote that they found
Islam to be a more rational and scientific religion than Christianity. Even if
many of the theological claims of the NOI were no more based on modern sci-
ence than those of many Christian groups, NOI members presented their reli-
gion as grounded in material reality. They criticised the doctrine of the Trinity
(the Christian belief that God is three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost) as
irrational. Their belief that God was a human being, not some “spook in space,”
exemplified the NOI belief that their religion was grounded in fact rather than
fiction. The same was true for their belief that heaven and heaven were not
actual places, but states of mind—a belief shared by many other metaphysical
religions in the twentieth century (Curtis 2006: 16–24).
NOI catechisms entitled ‘Actual Facts’, the ‘Rules of Islam’, and ‘Student
Enrollment’, memorised by both male and female followers, offered both astro-
nomical fact and cosmological theory. For example, ‘Actual Facts’ detailed the
various distances between planets in the solar system and the Sun as well as
the total square mileage of land on the Earth. In explaining the separation of
the Moon from the Earth, this catechism credited a scientist with creating an
explosion sixty-six trillion years ago. Indeed, the belief that scientists’ mas-
tery of technology was behind most cosmological events was central to Elijah
Muhammad’s thought. Like Christian fundamentalists, he agreed with the
idea that the current historical dispensation, or the reign of white civilisation,
began 6,000 years ago, but he argued that the actual origins of humanity—that
is, Black humanity—could be dated to trillions of years ago (Curtis 2016).
No matter how esoteric Elijah Muhammad’s teachings may have seemed to
those outside the movement, these lessons attempted to give concrete reasons
for the relative lack of social, cultural, and political power among Black peo-
ple, and offer the means to Black empowerment. The fullest published expres-
sion of his theology was in his 1965 opus, Message to the Blackman in America.
In explaining the origins of slavery and racism, Elijah Muhammad offered a
unique myth, sometimes called ‘the Myth of Yacub’. Referring to archeological
and anthropological discoveries on the African continent, Elijah Muhammad
said that the original man—the first human species—was Black. These Black
people, who followed the religion of Islam, lived in Mecca, he said, where they
existed in an Edenic state. But a mad scientist named Yacub began the pro-
cess of genetically engineering the white man, who was naturally brutish and
rapacious. White people eventually conquered the Black people, and Black/
Muslims forgot their language, Arabic, and their true religion. They adopted
the religion of their slave masters. These enslaved Black people gave up their
dignified, respectable behaviors, the Messenger taught. They ate poorly,
became sexually promiscuous, became lazy, and accepted their lot in life. But
God would not abandon God’s people. The appearance of W.D. Fard to Elijah
Muhammad promised to change this history. Commissioned by Fard to “men-
tally resurrect” Black people, Elijah Muhammad would bring Black people back
to Islam. They would separate from their slave masters and live righteously
again. They could again live in a state of heavenly contentment if they would
follow the Messenger’s strict program of self-improvement (Muhammad 1972;
Curtis 2006: 68–93).
Much of this ethical program of uplift focused on strengthening, purifying,
and disciplining the Black body, which was tied to the fate of the entire Black
race. For example, members of the NOI devoted a great deal of energy to their
diet. According to Elijah Muhammad, NOI Muslims should avoid all pork and
liquor—like other Muslims—but also the foods that came to be associated
with the shameful legacy of slavery such as “lima beans, butter beans, black-
eyed peas, green cabbage collard greens, pinto beans, kidney beans, brown
field beans, cornbread, carp, catfish, crustaceans, mollusks, rabbit, possum,
squirrel, [and] coon” (Curtis 2006: 98). Other beans were fine, and indeed the
movement became known for selling bean pies, which were often made from
navy beans. Red meat should be limited, and the Messenger exhorted followers
to give up refined sugar, which, he said, was increasing diabetes among African
Americans. He also asked followers to limit their overall caloric in-take and
eat only one meal a day. Ramadan was practiced in the movement, but during
Advent rather than during the actual Islamic (lunar) month of Ramadan. Elijah
Muhammad explained that a Yuletide practice of Ramadan would help focus
his followers’ attention on Islam rather than Christianity during the holiday
season. Eventually, all of the Messenger’s teachings on diet were compiled into
a monograph entitled How to Eat to Live (1972). Various columns and letters
in the movement newspaper, Muhammad Speaks, outlined the health advan-
tages of following this diet, and many believers testified to how following a
strict diet could cure various bodily ailments (Curtis 2006: 98–109).
In addition to providing guidelines on how to eat, the movement became
an incubator of food businesses that focused on providing healthy and whole-
some food to the Black community overall. Elijah Muhammad himself owned
several farms, a dairy, a meat processing plant, and by the 1970s, a multi-million
dollar fish import business called Whiting H & G. NOI followers were not only
employed in these businesses but also established their own restaurants, bak-
eries, and groceries. Women in the NOI became known for selling homemade
goods, especially the bean pie, around NOI places of worship, during NOI
events, and in their homes and neighborhoods (Curtis 2006: 98–109).
Dress, fashion, and adornment were also essential to the NOI’s focus on the
ethics of the Black body. Unlike the teachings on food, many of these teachings
emphasised the movement’s central focus on properly gendered nature of male
and female Black bodies. In the case of both men and women, Black Muslims
were to dress in a respectable, dignified, and modest manner. But much of
the discussion of dress in the movement centered on women’s bodies. Many
female writers in the Muhammad Speaks beckoned women to stop imitating
what they regarded as white fashions. They proclaimed that wearing cosmetics
and short skirts, bleaching skin, and dying hair obscured the natural beauty of
Black women. Eschewing conventional fashion was a religious issue, as Sister
Beverly 3X wrote in a poem: “Years ago, hemlines were not too short, but the
clothes fit tight / I thought I was really all right. / A stone fox? No! An ignorant
fool, following the devil’s evil rule” (Curtis 2006: 114). Elijah Muhammad went
even further when African American women in the 1970s began to wear afros.
He banned them from the movement, and one of his female columnists said
that African people did not actually wear their hair in this manner. To be natu-
rally Black, it was said, was to be more civilised than wearing ‘savage’ styles like
the afro.
As much as dress and fashion focused on the female Black body, the NOI’s
program of moral reform concerning sexuality and reproduction did so even
more. The official teaching of the movement was that men and women were
equally responsible for sexual morality, which was defined as heterosexual
married monogamy. Men in the movement were shamed and punished for
sex outside wedlock and for adultery, especially with white women. But it was
once again women’s bodies that were often the focus of the NOI’s official teach-
ings about sexuality. Muhammad Speaks discussed women’s bodies as the field
in which the seeds of the Black nation must be planted. Elijah Muhammad
talked about birth control as a form of Black genocide. Women were told to
have large families in order to repopulate the race. Not all women in the move-
ment followed the teachings about birth control, but it is also clear that patri-
archy of the NOI was attractive to many of its female members. In the 1960s
and 1970s, African American women remained extremely vulnerable to sexual
violence from both white and African American men. The promise of physical
protection, which sometimes included escorts from the home to the mosque,
made some NOI women feel safe. Moreover, Black women’s safety was under
threat from the state. One primary example of state violence against African
American women was forced sterilisation, especially of poor African American
women. This is one of the key contexts in which to understand why, even as
second-wave feminism and the movement for the Equal Rights Amendment
gained ground, tens of thousands of African American women would choose to
support a sexually conservative movement like the NOI (Curtis 2006: 118–130).
Men and women also often operated inside the movement in separate
spheres. Men participated in the Fruit of Islam, a fraternal organisation that
insured movement discipline, provided security for NOI events, and arranged
for the selling of movement newspapers. The Fruit of Islam was organised in
military fashion: men inside the group possessed various military ranks and
they were taught military salutes and protocols. The Fruit, as they were some-
times called, were much more than a self-defense force. It provided a male
space for the teaching of NOI religious texts and catechisms as well as activi-
ties such as woodworking. In the 1960s and 1970s, members were told to sell a
certain number of copies of Muhammad Speaks newspapers each week, and
sometimes developed entertaining, even aggressive sales techniques to hawk
their newspapers on the streets of Black America. NOI women were enrolled
in Muslim Girls Training-General Civilization, which taught cooking, sewing,
spelling, penmanship, hygiene, child-rearing, and other subjects thought to be
essential to being a wife and mother. Women sometimes learned to march in
military fashion and maintained various military ranks. Like the Fruit, Muslim
from the respect and devotion of tens of thousands to his prophetic utterances
and his person. They regarded him a genuine prophet, and if his teachings did
not make sense on an initial hearing, this was the result of their lack of under-
standing, not his lack of explanatory skill (Curtis 2006: 160–167).
Toward the end of his life, Elijah Muhammad began to make plain or per-
haps reinterpret the meanings of some of his prophecies. This was especially
true for his prophecy that the world would be destroyed by a Mother Plane,
which he compared to Ezekiel’s wheel (Ezekiel 1:16). Like his teachings about
the origins of the Earth and of humankind, his proclamations about the end
of white America were heavily invested in technological explanations of sal-
vation history. In 1972, during a television interview, he revealed that the end
of white supremacy would not equate into the end of white people. “I must
tell the truth,” he explained. “there will be no such thing as the elimination
of all white people from the earth.” In his other works, including The Supreme
Wisdom (1957) and The Fall of America (1973), the Messenger explained or at
the least implied that what would be eliminated was not white people, but the
whiteness in people—the genetic or moral poison that created racism and vio-
lence. The appearance of the Mother Ship would be like medicine. The Mother
Ship would reign down fire upon humanity, but such fire was a spiritual tech-
nology of righteousness. If people were willing to take this spiritual medicine,
humankind could rediscover its Blackness, that is, its original goodness, and
live in peace and harmony. Though the NOI did much to further a dark and
angry religious vision of the racial apocalypse, Elijah Muhammad’s religious
teaching was in the end a utopian vision of human solidarity (Curtis 2016).
In February 1975, Elijah Muhammad died, and though he never publicly named
a successor, it was son, Wallace D. Muhammad (also spelled W.D. Mohammed,
1933–2008) who emerged as the NOI leader at that year’s Saviour’s Day con-
vention. In just a few short years, Imam Mohammed, as he would eventually
be known, radically altered key characteristics of the movement. In short, he
transformed the NOI from a new religious movement into an African American
Sunnī Muslim religious denomination. Mohammed abandoned the NOI pro-
fession of belief in W.D. Fard as God and his father as a prophet. In its place, the
leader asked his follower to recite the shahada, or the profession of belief that
there is no god but God and Muḥammad (of Arabia) is the Messenger of God.
He instructed his followers to pray five times a day, to observe the holy month
of fast during the Islamic month of Ramadan, and to go on ḥajj. Mohammed
also eventually disbanded the Fruit of Islam and Muslim Girls Training, partly
because he no longer wanted to use these groups to enforce the strict moral
rules of the movement. From this point on, believers would answer to God and
their own conscience for their behavior (Curtis 2002: 107–127).
Mohammed’s approach to US politics and society was just as radical. Like
his father before him, Mohammed had refused to serve in the US military and
spent time in prison rather than take even a non-combat role. But as a leader,
Imam Mohammed encouraged his followers to volunteer for military service.
Over the next few decades, many of his followers would become the most
highly ranked Muslim members of the US military and Imam Mohammed
himself would be honored at the Pentagon, the Department of Defense head-
quarters, for his commitment to the US military after the first Gulf War. The
Imam even introduced US flags in NOI mosques (Curtis 2002: 107–127).
Instead of encouraging racial separatism, Imam Mohammed invited white
people to join the NOI, and participated in various interfaith cooperation
efforts, most prominently in the Roman Catholic Focolare movement. To sym-
bolise the new stance of the NOI, Imam Mohammed changed the name of the
group to the World Community of al-Islam in the West. The organisation would
go through more name changes, being called the American Muslim Mission
and the American Society of Muslims until eventually it became known simply
as the W.D. Mohammed community. Mohammed also divested himself of his
father’s business empire, and eventually handed over control of all mosque
properties to each congregation. He did not wish to be in charge of a business,
he said; he wanted to be a religious leader (Curtis 2002: 107–127).
There were also some continuities with his father’s NOI. Imam Mohammed
continued to stress the appeal of the movement to African Americans and cel-
ebrated historical Black achievements in Islamic and US history. The 1970s wit-
nessed a popular Black ethnic revival, and Imam Mohammed participated in
the movement to honor African American roots by asking his followers to call
themselves ‘Bilalians’, after the Black companion of the Prophet Muḥammad
and first prayer-caller of Islam, the freedman, Bilal ibn Rabah. The name of the
newspaper was also changed from Muhammad Speaks to Bilalian News. Imam
Mohammed renamed the parochial schools of the movement, calling them the
Clara Muhammad Schools after his mother, whom he discussed as an impor-
tant African American historical figure (Curtis 2002: 107–127).
All of these changes were called the ‘Second Resurrection’ and Imam
Mohammed told NOI members that W.D. Fard and his father had intended
for them to occur all along. Many, if not most NOI members stayed with him
through these changes. As NOI businesses ceased operations and the entre-
preneurial activities tied to each congregation declined, followers nonetheless
5 Conclusion
References
Clegg, C.A. III. 1997. An Original Man: The Life and Times of Elijah Muhammad. New
York: St. Martin’s Press.
Curtis, E.E. IV. 2002. Islam in Black America. Albany, NY: State University of New York
Press.
Curtis, E.E. IV. 2006. Black Muslim Religion in the Nation of Islam, 1960–1975. Chapel
Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Curtis, E.E. IV. 2013. “The Black Muslim Scare of the Twentieth Century: The History of
State Islamophobia and Its Post-9/11 Variations.” In C.W. Ernst ed., Islamophobia in
America: The Anatomy of Intolerance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Curtis, E.E. IV. 2015. “My Heart Is in Cairo: Malcolm X, the Arab Cold War, and the
Making of Islamic Liberation Ethics.” Journal of American History. 102:3, 775–798.
Curtis, E.E. IV. 2016. “Science and Technology in Elijah Muhammad’s Nation of Islam:
Astrophysical Disaster, Genetic Engineering, UFO s, White Apocalypse, and Black
Resurrection.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions. 20:1,
5–31.
Evanzz, K. The Messenger: The Rise and Fall of Elijah Muhammad. New York: Vintage.
Gardell, M. 1996. In the Name of Elijah Muhammad: Louis Farrakhan and the Final Call.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Lincoln, C.E. 1961. The Black Muslims in America. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.