0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views1 page

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia Imaging Guide

The document provides an overview of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH), a benign liver tumor characterized by a hyperplastic response to localized vascular abnormalities. It details imaging features, differential diagnoses, and diagnostic checklists, emphasizing that imaging is more reliable than histology for diagnosis. Gadoxetate-enhanced MR is highlighted as the most specific test for diagnosing FNH, with key imaging findings including a bright, homogeneously enhancing mass and a central scar.

Uploaded by

adel adel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views1 page

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia Imaging Guide

The document provides an overview of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNH), a benign liver tumor characterized by a hyperplastic response to localized vascular abnormalities. It details imaging features, differential diagnoses, and diagnostic checklists, emphasizing that imaging is more reliable than histology for diagnosis. Gadoxetate-enhanced MR is highlighted as the most specific test for diagnosing FNH, with key imaging findings including a bright, homogeneously enhancing mass and a central scar.

Uploaded by

adel adel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Radiology Key

Fastest Radiology Insight Engine

Menu

Search...

Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

Hypodense or isodense to normal liver

• Delayed scans
Mass: Isodense to normal liver
Central scar: Hyperdense or hyperintense (due to fibrous tissue)
• Gadoxetate-enhanced MR
Most specific test to diagnose FNH
Prolonged enhancement of entire FNH (except scar) on delayed scan

TOP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES

• Hepatic adenoma
Rarely retains gadoxetate on delayed phase MR
• Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma
Usually large (> 12 cm) heterogeneous mass
Has “aggressive” features such as metastases
• Hepatic cavernous hemangioma
Enhanced portions isodense to vessels
• Hypervascular metastasis
Usually multiple with known primary tumor

DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST

• Imaging is more reliable than histology in establishing diagnosis of FNH


• Diagnosis can be made by CT alone in most cases
MR with gadoxetate enhancement is most specific test

(Left) Graphic shows a homogeneous, vascular, nonencapsulated mass


with a central scar and thin radiating septa dividing the mass into hyperplastic
nodules. Note the cluster of small arteries near the central scar.

(Right) Axial arterial phase CECT shows bright, homogeneous enhancement of a

mass with a central scar in an asymptomatic young woman who


had a mass found on ultrasound. The CT findings in this case are diagnostic of
FNH and require no further evaluation.

(Left) This liver wedge resection shows a well-circumscribed nodular lesion with a

central stellate scar , typical of FNH. (Courtesy M. Yeh, MD, PhD.)

(Right) The central scar as well as the fibrous septa may contain thick-walled

vessels . (Courtesy M. Yeh, MD, PhD.)

TERMINOLOGY
Abbreviations

• Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH)

Definitions

• Benign tumor of liver caused by hyperplastic response to localized vascular


abnormality

IMAGING
General Features

• Best diagnostic clue


Bright, homogeneously enhancing mass on arterial phase CT or MR with
delayed enhancement of central scar
– Hyperintense enhancement on hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate-enhanced
MR
• Location
Usually subcapsular and rarely pedunculated
• Size
Majority are < 5 cm unless symptomatic
• Morphology
Spherical nonencapsulated mass
• Key concepts
2nd most common benign tumor of liver
Benign congenital hamartomatous malformation
Accounts for 8% of primary hepatic tumors in autopsy series
Usually solitary lesion (80%); multiple (20%)
Multiple FNHs are associated with multiorgan vascular malformations and
certain brain neoplasms

CT Findings

• NECT
Isodense or hypodense to normal liver
• CECT
Hepatic arterial phase scan
– Transient, intense, homogeneous hyperdensity
Portal venous phase scan
– Hypodense or isodense to normal liver
– Large draining veins → hepatic veins
Delayed scans
– Mass: ∼ isodense to normal liver
– Central scar: Hyperdense (due to fibrous tissue)
– Scar visible in 2/3 of large and 1/3 of small FNHs
“Large” > 3 cm

MR Findings

• T1WI
Mass: Isointense to slightly hypointense
Central scar: Hypointense
• T2WI
Mass: Slightly hyperintense to isointense
Central scar: Hyperintense
• T1WI C+
Arterial phase: Hyperintense (homogeneous)
Portal venous: Isointense to liver
Delayed phase
– Mass: Isointense
– Scar: Hyperintense
• Specific hepatobiliary MR contrast agents
Gadoxetate (Eovist or Primovist)
– Bright, homogeneous enhancement of FNH on arterial phase
– Prolonged enhancement of entire FNH on hepatobiliary phase (delayed, ∼ 20
minutes)
Intensity of FNH > liver
Most specific test to distinguish from all other hepatic masses
Due to functioning hepatocytes, malformed bile ductules

Ultrasonographic Findings

• Grayscale ultrasound
Mass: Mostly homogeneous and isoechoic to liver
– Occasionally hypoechoic or hyperechoic
Central scar: Hypoechoic
• Color Doppler
Spoke-wheel pattern
– Large central feeding artery with multiple small vessels radiating peripherally
Large draining veins at tumor margins
High-velocity Doppler signals
– Due to increased blood flow or arteriovenous shunts

Angiographic Findings

• Conventional
Arterial phase
– Tumor: Hypervascular
– Scar: Hypovascular
– Enlargement of main feeding artery with centrifugal blood supply
– Same spoke-wheel pattern as on color Doppler

Only gold members can


continue reading. Log In or
Register to continue

Share this:

 

Related Posts:

Rectal Prolapse and Neutropenic Colitis


Intussusception (Typhlitis)

Colonic Diverticulosis Biliary


Cystadenocarcinoma

Pancreas Divisum Crohn Disease

Nov 16, 2016 | Posted by admin in GASTROINTESTINAL IMAGING |


Comments Off

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access

You might also like