Design of 54 m - Box Girder - Entire Analsysis

Authority / Client Desingnation Name Signature

Contractor Desingnation Name Signature

Proof Consultant Desingnation Name Signature

Design Consultant Desingnation Name Signature

Revision History
Rev. No. Date Revision History
Name of Work
Title Design Certifcate
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk. By
R0
Name of Work
Title Contractor's Certificate
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk. By
R0
Name of Work
Title Table of Contents
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk. By
R0
 Name of Work
Title Introduction
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk. By
R0

1 Introduction
The aim of this report is to present the longitudinal analysis and design of 54 m box girder spans
without any radius of curvature.

The proposed viaduct has precast post-tensioned segmental UHPFRC box girder type of
superstructure.

Following Points are considered for the design:

Width of Bridge / Viaduct = 8.8 m
Track Spacing = 4.2 m
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0

1 DATA

1.1 Material
Concrete Girder = 155 MPa
Concrete Slab = 50 MPa
Concrete Parapet = 40 MPa
Reinforcement = Fe500D conforming to IS14268
HT strands = Lox Relaxation strands conforming to IS14268
a = 1.17E-05
Ec Girder = 50000
Ec Slab = 35000
Es = 195000
UTS of strands = 1860 M Pa
Initial prestress = 78.3 %
Modular ratio = 3.900
Creep strain = 0.000043
Shrinkage strain = 0

Maturity of concrete wrt time Age Creep Strain due to residual shrinkage
Please refer to clause 6.2 of IRC 112 3 0.00043
Time (days) Strength 7 0.00035
8 80.44 10 0.0003
14 90.16 14 0.00025
21 96.21 21 0.0002
28 100.00 28 0.00019
90 0.00015

Relaxation loss
As per clause 16.8.2.2 of IRS CBC
Relaxation Relaxation
Initial stress loss loss
1000 hr 50 years
.5 fp 0 0
.7 fp 2.5 7.5
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0
1.2 Permissible stresses
Characteristic Strenght Allowable Stresses

Concrete Girder = M 155 83.7 MPa

Concrete Slab = M 50 22.5 MPa

Reinfrocement = Fe 500 D 300 MPa

1.3 Geometry

C/C of Pier = 54.00 m

C/C of Bearing = 53.00 m

CDA - Coefficient of Dynamic Augumentation 1.1316014

* Effective Flange is same at End And Mid span of Girder as the width of web is same

1.4 Live Load

Train Loading Details

21.85

160 kN 160 kN 160 kN 160 kN

Type 1 2.35 2.3 12.55 2.30 2.35

1.5 Analysis
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0

The analysis is done in analysis software LARSA- 4D.

a. Dead load is modelled as composite property.
b. SIDL is modelled as UDL
c. Live load is applied as Moving load.
d. Construction stage are also modelled in follwing manner to undertand the behavior in depth.
Sr,No. Activity Days
1 Casting of girder 0
2 Stressing of All cables in two or more cycles 15
3 Casting of deck slab 21
4 SIDL 28
5 Live Load 30

1.6 Sectional Properties

At Transfer - At Midspan
Prestressing Type
Modulus Ratio n 5.27
Sectional Area A mm2
Second Moment of Inertia Ixx mm4
Distance from N.A. (Top) ytop mm
Distance from N.A. (Bot) ybot 0.00 mm
Section Modulus (Top) Ztop #DIV/0! mm3
Section Modulus (Bot) Zbot #DIV/0! mm3
Distance of Strand from Top Extreme Fiber dtop mm
Distance of Strand from Bot. Extreme Fiber dbot mm
Assume Total Losses Rtransfer %
No. of Top Strands (Internal) 2K15 pcs
Strand Configuration in 1st Blister
Strand Configuration in 2nd Blister
No. of Bottom Strands (External) 23K15 pcs
Prestress Forces (Top Strands) Pi,top 0.00 kN
Prestress Forces (Bottom Strands) Pi,bot 0.00 kN
Eccentricity (Top) ei,top 0.00 mm
Eccentricity (Bot) ei,bot 0.00 mm

At Transfer - Support
Prestressing Type
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0
Modulus Ratio n 5.27
Sectional Area A mm2
Second Moment of Inertia Ixx mm4
Distance from N.A. (Top) ytop mm
Distance from N.A. (Bot) ybot 0.00 mm
Section Modulus (Top) Ztop #DIV/0! mm3
Section Modulus (Bot) Zbot #DIV/0! mm3
Distance of Strand from Top Extreme Fiber dtop mm
Distance of Strand from Bot. Extreme Fiber dbot mm
Assume Total Losses Rtransfer %
No. of Top Strands (Internal) 2K15 pcs
Strand Configuration in 1st Blister
Strand Configuration in 2nd Blister
No. of Bottom Strands (External) 23K15 pcs
Prestress Forces (Top Strands) Pi,top 0.00 kN
Prestress Forces (Bottom Strands) Pi,bot 0.00 kN
Eccentricity (Top) ei,top 0.00 mm
Eccentricity (Bot) ei,bot 0.00 mm

At Service - At Midspan
Prestressing Type
Modulus Ratio n 5.27
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0
Sectional Area A mm2
Second Moment of Inertia Ixx mm4
Distance from N.A. (Top) ytop mm
Distance from N.A. (Bot) ybot 0.00 mm
Section Modulus (Top) Ztop #DIV/0! mm3
Section Modulus (Bot) Zbot #DIV/0! mm3
Distance of Strand from Top Extreme Fiber dtop mm
Distance of Strand from Bot. Extreme Fiber dbot mm
Assume Total Losses Rtransfer %
No. of Top Strands (Internal) 2K15 pcs
Strand Configuration in 1st Blister
Strand Configuration in 2nd Blister
No. of Bottom Strands (External) 23K15 pcs
Prestress Forces (Top Strands) Pi,top 0.00 kN
Prestress Forces (Bottom Strands) Pi,bot 0.00 kN
Eccentricity (Top) ei,top 0.00 mm
Eccentricity (Bot) ei,bot 0.00 mm

At Service - At Support
Prestressing Type
Modulus Ratio n 5.27
Sectional Area A mm2
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0
Second Moment of Inertia Ixx mm4
Distance from N.A. (Top) ytop mm
Distance from N.A. (Bot) ybot 0.00 mm
Section Modulus (Top) Ztop #DIV/0! mm3
Section Modulus (Bot) Zbot #DIV/0! mm3
Distance of Strand from Top Extreme Fiber dtop mm
Distance of Strand from Bot. Extreme Fiber dbot mm
Assume Total Losses Rtransfer %
No. of Top Strands (Internal) 2K15 pcs
Strand Configuration in 1st Blister
Strand Configuration in 2nd Blister
No. of Bottom Strands (External) 23K15 pcs
Prestress Forces (Top Strands) Pi,top 0.00 kN
Prestress Forces (Bottom Strands) Pi,bot 0.00 kN
Eccentricity (Top) ei,top 0.00 mm
Eccentricity (Bot) ei,bot 0.00 mm

At Service - At Support - Negative

Prestressing Type
Modulus Ratio n 5.27
Sectional Area A mm2
Second Moment of Inertia Ixx mm4
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0
Distance from N.A. (Top) ytop mm
Distance from N.A. (Bot) ybot 0.00 mm
Section Modulus (Top) Ztop #DIV/0! mm3
Section Modulus (Bot) Zbot #DIV/0! mm3
Distance of Strand from Top Extreme Fiber dtop mm
Distance of Strand from Bot. Extreme Fiber dbot mm
Assume Total Losses Rtransfer %
No. of Top Strands (Internal) 2K15 pcs
Strand Configuration in 1st Blister
Strand Configuration in 2nd Blister
No. of Bottom Strands (External) 23K15 pcs
Prestress Forces (Top Strands) Pi,top 0.00 kN
Prestress Forces (Bottom Strands) Pi,bot 0.00 kN
Eccentricity (Top) ei,top 0.00 mm
Eccentricity (Bot) ei,bot 0.00 mm

All the losses are assumed to have occurred at the transfer only. As the losses due to shrinkage
and creep are non-existant. This is in reference to the NF P -18-470

1.7 SIDL

i) SIDL - Fixed
For two track System

i) Rails + pads + plinth = 31 KN/m

ii) Parapet = 36 KN/m
(Along each outer edge) = 18 KN/m
iii) Hand rail with beam and columns
between two tracks = 7.51 KN/m

ii) SIDL - Variable

For two track System

i) Cables = 0.7 KN/m

(Along each outer edge) = 0.35 KN/m
ii) Cables trough cell = 7.4 KN/m
(Along each outer edge) = 3.7 KN/m
Name of Work
Title DATA
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0
iii) Cable trays = 0.1 KN/m
(Along each outer edge) = 0.05 KN/m

iv) Misellaneous ( OCS, Signaling) = 4 KN/m

(Along each outer edge) = 2 KN/m

1.8
ior in depth.
 Stress Check - Longitudinal Analysis
At first
S. No. Load Case Support Blister 1st Joint 2nd joint 3rd Joint 4th Joint 5th Joint 6th Joint 7th Joint 8th Joint Mid Span
1 Dead Load Moment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stress at top
Stress at Bottom
2 Prestressing
Axial Force 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Hogging Moment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stress at top
Stress at Bottom
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

3 SIDL - Rails and Other Load 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Stress at top
Stress at Bottom
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

4 Differential Shrinkage 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stress at top
Stress at Bottom
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

5 Temperature - Rise
Stress at top
Stress at Bottom

6 Temperature - Fall
Stress at top
Stress at Bottom
6 Live Load 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stress at top
Stress at Bottom

7 Seismic Vertical 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stress at top
Stress at Bottom

8a Combination 1
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

8b Combination 2
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

8c Combination 3
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

8d Combination 4
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

8e Combination 5
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom

8f Combination 6
Resultant Stress at Top
Resultant Stress at Bottom
Name of Work
Title Moment of Resistance Capacity of UHFPRC Girder using 1st Principle - Strain Compatibility
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0

Prestressed Concrete Girder (Ultimate check) 1610

250
65 1200
75
550 550
100

1 Ultimate stress in cables in Mpa 1860.00 Mpa

2 stress @0.1%of proof strain 1618.20 Mpa
3 factor of safety for basic combination 1.15
4 design stress in Mpa 1407.13 Mpa
5 elastic modulus of steel 195000.00 Mpa
6 design strain 0.00722
7 force in cable no. 1 inkg 4694.95 kN
8 area of cable no. 1 3220.00 sq.mm
9 prestrain in cable no. 1 0.129
10 distance of cable 1 from bottom 73.000 mm
11 assume neutral axis Xu 51.412 mm
12 ultimate strain at extreme compression face 0.004
13 rectangular stress block height 41.129 mm
14 grade of concrete Cube strenght 155.000 Mpa
15 design compressive stress 69.750 Mpa
16 compressive force in Ton 461.872 tonf
17 distance of cables from neutal axis to cable 1 0.976 m
975.588 mm
18 strain in cable no.1 0.063
19 total strain in cable no.1 0.192
20 stress in steel at respective strain level cable no. 1 1407.130 Mpa
21 Total Axial tensile force in cable no. 1 461.872 tonf
22 difference in comp force and tensile force 0.00 tonf
23 tenslie axial force in cable 1 461.872 tonf
24 total moment about neutral axis 450.60 tonf.m
4420.35 kNm
25 compressive force moment about N.A. 11.87 tonf.m
26 Total ultimate moment 4536.82 kNm
27 lever Z for shear calculations 1.00 m
Name of Work
Title Shear Resistance Check - Ultimate Limit States
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0

Reference: NF P 18-710: 2016-04: National Addition to Eurocode2 - Design of Concrete

Structure: Specific Rules for Ultra-High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC)

Characteristic value of compressive strength fck,UHPFCR = 155 MPa

Safety Factor gcf gE = 1.5
Average confining stress due to prestress scp = MPa
Total Axial Force due to Prestressing in the Cross-Sectio NED = kN
Gross Cross Section of Prestress Beam (Concrete Area) Ac = mm2
k Factor in Eq.6.205 k = 1
Total Web Thickness bw = 100 mm
Effective Depth of Composite Section d = 1000 mm
Lever Arm of External Force z = 900 mm
Design Shear Resistance Provided by UHPFRC VRd,c = 179 kN
Cross Section Area of the Shear Reo. Asw = mm2
Stirrups Spacing Used s = 200 mm
Lever Arm of External Force z = 900 mm
Tensile Strength of Reo. fyw = 500 MPa
Partial Factor for Steel Reo. ys = 1.15
Design Tensile Strength of the Shear Reo. fywd = 435 MPa
Angle of Inclination of the Main Compression Stress on
q 38 deg.
The Longiditudinal Axis =
Design Shear Resistance Provided by Stirrups VRd,s = 0 kN
Global Fiber Orientation Factor K = 1.25
Partial Factor for UHPRFC under Tension gcf = 1.3
Angle of Inclination of the Main Compression Stress on =
q 38 deg.
The Longiditudinal Axis
Effective Vertical Web Area Afv = 90000 mm2
Mean Value of Post Cracking Strength sRd,f = 4.92307692308 MPa
Design Shear Resistance Provided by Fibers VRd,f = 567 kN
Coefficient of Long-Term Effects on Compressive Streng acc = 0.85
Partial Factor for UHPFRC yc = #REF!
Design Limit Force for the Compressive Strength of
#REF! kN
UHPFRC without shear Reinforcement =
Design Limit Force for the Compressive Strength of
#REF! kN
UHPFRC with shear reinforcment =
Design Limit Force for the Compressive Strength of U VRd,max = #REF! kN
Design Shear Resistance VRd = 746.391154321 kN
Total Resisting Shear Force VRd,total = #REF! kN
 at 2 m from
at Support Mid Span
Support
Design Shear Force, VEd
Net Shear Force Vned
Design Shear Force Resistance, VRd
Not OK Not OK Not OK

Check for Complementary tensile force due to the shear force

Angle of Inclination of the Main

Compression Stress on The q 0 0 0
Longiditudinal Axis
Cotθ #NUM! #NUM! #NUM!
tanθ 0 0 0
ΔFtd #NUM! #NUM! #NUM!
Tensile stress generated in Concrete #NUM! #NUM! #NUM!
Resutant Stress at bottom #REF! #REF! #REF!
In Limit state Serviciability
Final Resultant Stress at Bottom of Girder #REF! #REF! #REF!
#REF! #REF! #REF!
In Ultimate Limit states
Design Moment Med 0 #NAME? 0
Resisitng Moment Mrd 150 #REF! #REF!
Lever Arm Z 800 800 800
(Mrd-Med) / Z 188 #REF! #REF!
ΔFtd #NUM! #NUM! #NUM!
#NUM! #REF! #REF!
MPa
LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Name of Work
Title Interface Shear Check - Design of Shear Connectors
Revision Description for Revision Date Design By Chk By
R0

Horizontal Shear Stress, (P.65, NF P18-710) INTERFACE SHEAR CHECK AS PER FRENCH
STANDARD
vEdi ≤ vRdi

vEdi = β*VEd/(Z*bi)
β= Err:509

* Note (1): joint between a UHPFRC and an ordinary concrete (no indentations) {EC2, 1992, P.92, Eq.(6.25)}
vRdi = c fctd + µσn + ρ fyd (µ sin α + cos α) ≤ 0.5 ν fcd
c 0.2
µ 0.6
σn 0
α 90 deg
ν 0.48

** Note (2): At the interface between two different UHPFRCs (no indentations) {NF P18-710, 2016, P.65, Eq.(6.243)}
vRdi = c fctk,el/Ɣc + µσn + ρ fyd (µ sin α + cos α) ≤ 1.15.αcc.f2/3ck/Ɣc
αcc= 0.85
Ɣc= 1.5

*** Note (3): For indentations {NF P18-710, 2016, P.66, Eq.(6.244)}
vRdi = c fctk,el/Ɣc + µσn + ρ fyd (µ sin α + cos α) + (0.35µ + 0.3).fctk,el/K.Ɣc ≤ 1.15.α cc.f2/3ck/Ɣc
K= Orientation factor of the fibers

Bi 250
Z 900
fcd 22.7
fctd 1.67
fyd 435
L 17.45 m
V*Edi 775 kN
vRdi = c fctd + µσn + ρ fyd (µ sin α + cos α) ≤ 0.5 ν fcd = 5.44

Nos. of
Spacing
Distance Av. V*Edi Av. v*Edi link per Shear Stud Stud Area, As, used per ρ
V*Edi (kN) Adopted vRdi (MPa) V*Rdi (kN) vEdi ≤ vRdi Ratio
(m) (kN) (MPa) meter per Type Asf (mm2) m run
(mm)
web
0 775
0.2 757
0.4 739
731 3.247 100 10.0 2T20 628 6283 0.0251 6.89 1551 OK 2.00
0.6 722
0.8 704
1 686
1.2 668
1.4 651
1.6 633 633 2.813 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 1.53
1.8 615
2 597
2.2 580
2.4 562
2.6 544 544 2.418 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 1.76
2.8 526
3 509
3.2 491
3.4 473
3.6 455 455 2.023 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 2.08
3.8 437
4 420
4.2 402
4.4 384
4.6 366 366 1.629 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 2.54
4.8 349
5 331
5.2 313
5.4 295
5.6 278 278 1.234 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 3.26
5.8 260
6 242
6 6.2 224
6.4 207
6.6 189 189 0.839 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 4.55
6.8 171

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 21

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Name of Work
6
Title Interface Shear Check - Design of Shear Connectors
Revision Description
189 for0.839
Revision 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 Date0.0161 Design By
4.53 1020 OK Chk By 4.55
R0
7 153
7.2 135
7.4 118
7.6 100 100 0.444 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 7.53
7.8 82
8 64
8.2 47
8.4 29
8.6 11 14 0.061 100 10.0 2T16 402 4021 0.0161 4.53 1020 OK 21.87
8.725 0

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 22

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Name of
Work
Title Check for Lateral Stability
Revision Description for Revision Date Checked By AJ
R0 17.01.2025 Designed By NG

CHECK FOR LATERAL STABILITY

According to IRC112:2020 (CL11.4.2)

1 FOR IB850 19 M SPAN)

According, IRC 112 CL. 11.4.2.

250 X b^2
Clear distance between lateral restraints should not increase
h

1) When no Deck is considered as compression flange

b = 250 mm
h = 850 mm
Check = 250 x 250 x 250
850
= 18382.3529 mm
= 18.3823529 m

clear distance between lateral restraints = 17.45 m

provided as
= 18.38235 ˃ 17.45
Hence safe

2) When Girder along with deck is considered as compression flange

b = 2300.00 mm (min)
h = 1100 mm
Check = 250 x 2300 x 2300
1100
= 1202273 mm
= 1202.27 m

clear distance between lateral restraints = 17.45 m

provided as
= 1202.27 ˃ 17.45
Hence safe

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 23

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Name of
Work
Title Check for Lateral Stability
Revision Description for Revision Date Checked By AJ
R0 17.01.2025 Designed By NG

According to IRC112:2020 (CL11.4.2)

Second order effects due to lateral instability for the slender beams may be ignored if the following is satisfied

in Persistent situation in Transient situation

lot = 17.45 m lot = 17.45 m
b = 2.30 m b = 0.25 m
h = 0.85 m h = 0.85 m

h/b = 0.37 h/b = 3.40

ok ok

lot = 7.6 lot = 69.8

b b

50 = 405.88 70 = 61.76
(h/b)^1/3 (h/b)^1/3

lot < 405.88 lot > 61.76

b b
Hence Safe Revise

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 24

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Design and Construction of integrated structure consisting of Elevated Viaduct and 6 lane flyover (Double Deck system), Viaduct
and Elevated Ramps for viaduct and flyover Siding lines, Under Pass al Saket G. Elevated Ramp frem BRT comdor tu flyover and
Name of two lane underpass from MB road to BRT comidor and Four Elevated Stations viz. Sangam Wihar, Khanpur, Ambedkar Nagar and
Work Saket G (Excluding Architectural Finishing works of stations and PEB works of slations) from Chainage 1448000 m to 18760.00 m
of Aern City to Tugtakabad Comidor of Phase-IV of Delhi MRTS

Document LSSPL/DMRC/IB 850/DN-1 Approved By SJ

No
Revision Date Description for Revision Checked By AJ
R2 17.01.2025 As per comments by IIT Roorkee Designed By NG
Title Calculation for lifting hook capacity check

As per Clause no. 8.4.2. of NF P-18:710

(η𝛿 〖 𝑓〗 _(𝑐𝑡𝑘,𝑒𝑙))
/𝛾_𝑐
Ultimate Bond Stress = fbd =

η = 2.25 ξ = 0.25 (for prestresssing tendon)

ξ = 0.11 (Table 6.201 of NF P-18:710)

1+0.4×𝑓_𝑐𝑡𝑓𝑚/(□( 〖𝐾′〗
δ = _𝑔𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙 )×□(𝑓_(𝑐𝑡𝑚,𝑒𝑙) )) ≤ 1.5 (eq. 7.213 of NF P-18:710)

= 1.43 ≤ 1.5

Characteristic Value of Tensile Limit of Elasticity = fctk,el = 5 MPa (Table T.1 of NF P-18:710)
Mean Value of Post Cracking Strength = fctfm = 8 MPa (Table T.1 of NF P-18:710)
Orientation Factor associated with Global Effect = K'global = 1.25 (Table T.1 of NF P-18:710)
Mean Value of Tensile Limit of Elasticity = fctmel = 6 MPa (Table T.1 of NF P-18:710)
Partial Safety factor of Compressed UHPFRC = γc = 1.5 MPa (Table 2.201 of NF P-18:710)

Ultimate Bond Stress = fbd = 1.18 N/sq.mm

Lifting Capacity = fbd × (Embeded Length of Strand) × (Circumference of Strand)

Embeded Length of Strand = 600 mm

Circumference of Strand = 47.75 mm

Lifting Capacity = 539562 N

(for 4 nos. of strands) = 539.6 kN

Total Weight of Girder = 73.33363 kN

Wieght of Girder on Single Side = 36.67 kN

< 539.6 kN

Hence Safe

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 25

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Name of Work

Document No LSSPL/DMRC/IB 850/DN-1 Approved By SJ

Revision Date Description for Revision Checked By AJ
R2 17.01.2025 Designed By NG
Title Creep Calculation for Deck slab
ANNEXURE-2: CREEP CALCULATION FOR DECK SLAB

Effective width = 2.30 m

Depth of Deck = 0.250 m
fck = 50 MPa
fcm = 60 MPa
t0 = 7 days
t = 36500 days for 100 years (100 x 365 = 36500)

Cross Sectional Area (Ac) = 0.575 sq.m

Perimeter (u) = 5.1 m

Notional size (ho) = 0.225 m

= 225 mm

Relative Humidity (RH) (%) Avg. Annual RH (%) Table A7-1- IRC:112-2020
I II
73 68
58.5

Creep Coefficient =
= 2.22

where,
= 2.23

= 1.45 (For fcm ≥ 45 MPa)

= 0.80 = 0.94 = 0.85

= 2.42

= 0.63

= 0.996

= 552.293 (For fcm ≥ 45 MPa)

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 26

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Design and Construction of integrated structure consisting of Elevated Viaduct and 6 lane flyover (Double Deck system), Viaduct and
Elevated Ramps for viaduct and flyover Siding lines, Under Pass al Saket G. Elevated Ramp frem BRT comdor tu flyover and two lane
Name of underpass from MB road to BRT comidor and Four Elevated Stations viz. Sangam Wihar, Khanpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Saket G
Work (Excluding Architectural Finishing works of stations and PEB works of slations) from Chainage 1448000 m to 18760.00 m of Aern City
to Tugtakabad Comidor of Phase-IV of Delhi MRTS

Document LSSPL/DMRC/IB 850/DN-1

No Approved By SJ
Revision Date Description for Revision Checked By AJ
R2 17.01.2025 As per comments by IIT Roorkee Designed By NG
Title STRESSES DUE TO DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE
ANNEXURE-3 STRESSES DUE TO DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE

In order to understant the differential shrinkage it is first necesaary to Construction Stages

time t in
difference
days
Stage 1 Girder is aligned and Stressed on the ground 0
Stage 2 The girder is lifted and kept on the staging platform 2 2
Stage 3 The Deck slab is casted on the girder, from end to end expect the End Beam portion 9 7
Stage 4 End Beam is cast after shuttering and staging 21 12
Stage 5 Staging below the Girder is removed 28 7

Calculation for the total shrinkage strain which will occur during lifetime
t = 100 years
t = 36500 days age of concrete in days at the time considered
ts = 2 days age of concrete at the beginning of drying shrinkage
εca = 0.000075 As per Table 6.6 IRC:112-2011
εca(t) = 7.50E-05 Autogeneous shrinkage strain

Ac = 2.3 x 0.25
Ac = 0.575 sq.m
u = 5.1 m
ho = 0.225
εcd = 2.79E-04
kh = 0.825

εcd(t) = 2.29E-04 Drying shrinkage strain

εcs,∞ = 3.04E-04 Total shrinkage Strain

Calculation of Modulus of Elasticity of concrete with respect to time as per IRC:112-2011

fck = 50 N/mm2
t = 36500 days
t1 = 1 days Equation 6.3 IRC 112
S = 0.25 For Normal Portland Cement
Ecm = 35000 N/mm2 As per Table 6.5 IRC:112-2011
fcm = 60 N/mm2 As per Table 6.5 IRC:112-2011
βcc(t) = 1.2752 As per Eq. 6.3 of IRC:112-2011
fcm(t) = 76.51 N/mm2 As per Eq. 6.2 of IRC:112-2011
Ecm(t) = 37647.66 N/mm2 As per Eq. 6.10 of IRC:112-2011

DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE CALCULATION FOR IB 850- GIRDER

Now, the differential shrinkage strain will be the difference between the total shrinkage strain of cast in
situ deck slab and the shrinkage strain of the girder that takes place after the deck slab is cast.
Δεdiff = εcs (Cast in situ deck slab) – εcs (Precast Girder)
= 3.04E-04 - 0.00E+00
Differential shrinkage strain Δεdiff = 3.04E-04
Modulus of elasticity of concrete = 3.76E+07 kN/m2
Coefficient of creep = 2.224 for deck slab
Reduction factor to allow for creep = 0.40 IRC 112 Clause no. 6.4.2.4(4)(iii)
Differential shrinkage stress σdiff = 1.22E-04 x 3.76E+07
= 4592.46 kN/m2
Tensile force in slab due to differential shrinkage = 2640.66 kN

ECCENTRICITY = 0.2260 m
Moment = 596.79 Kn-m

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 27

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Ref: Prestressed Concrete Bridge using Eurocodes - Prab Bhatt

The stress in Slab shall be

At top of Slab = -1.22 Mpa (Compressive)
At bototm of slab = 0.36 Mpa (Tensile)

The stress in Beam shall be

At top of UHPFRC beam = -6.04 Mpa (Compressive)
At bototm of bottom of UHPFRC beam = 1.66 Mpa (Tensile)

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 28

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Design and Construction of integrated structure consisting of Elevated Viaduct and 6

lane flyover (Double Deck system), Viaduct and Elevated Ramps for viaduct and flyover
Siding lines, Under Pass al Saket G. Elevated Ramp frem BRT comdor tu flyover and two
lane underpass from MB road to BRT comidor and Four Elevated Stations viz. Sangam
Name of Work Wihar, Khanpur, Ambedkar Nagar and Saket G (Excluding Architectural Finishing works
of stations and PEB works of slations) from Chainage 1448000 m to 18760.00 m of
Aern City to Tugtakabad Comidor of Phase-IV of Delhi MRTS

Document No LSSPL/DMRC/IB 850/DN-1 Approved By SJ

Revision Date Description for Revision Checked By AJ
R2 17.01.2025 As per comments by IIT Roorkee Designed By NG
Title TEMPERATURE REVERSAL STRESSES
ANNEXURE-4 TEMPERATURE REVERSAL STRESSES

Calculation of Thermal Stresses in for IB 850 Girder

check for Temperature Reversal Condition

Grade of concrete 155 MPa

coefficient of expansion 1.100E-05
1.61
10.6
0.25
` 0.7 0.25
0.00
0.25
0
0.85 1.10 0 0.13
0.1
0.25
0.8
0.125 0.22
0.5 6.6

Zone Area A Y@ Top AY AY2 t0 C At AtY

1 1.61 x 0.25 0.403 0.125 0.050 0.006 0.700 0.282 0.035
2 1.61 x 0.25 0.403 0.083 0.034 0.003 4.554 1.833 0.153
3 0.6 x 0 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.700 0.000 0.000
4 0.6 x 0 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.396 0.000 0.000
5 0.6 x 0.25 0.150 0.333 0.050 0.017 0.350 0.053 0.017
6 0.25 x 0.25 0.025 0.797 0.020 0.016 0.400 0.010 0.008
7 0.1 x 0.095 0.048 0.928 0.044 0.041 2.505 0.119 0.110
8 0.1 x 0.095 0.048 0.943 0.045 0.042 2.505 0.119 0.112
9 0.5 x 0.125 0.063 0.943 0.059 0.056 2.505 0.157 0.148
10 0.5 x 0.125 0.063 0.963 0.060 0.058 2.048 0.128 0.123
Sum 1.200 0.362 0.238 2.700 0.707

Equation 1 ε ΣA - θ x ΣAY = At x α
1.2 ε - 0.36 θ = 3.0E-05

Equation 2 ε ΣAY - θ x ΣAY2 = AYt x α

0.36 ε - 0.24 θ = = 7.8E-06

Multiplying Eq. 1 x 0.238

0.2859 ε - 0.08619 θ = 7.1E-06

Multiplying Eq. 2 x 0.362

0.1309 ε - 0.08619 θ = 2.8E-06

Subtracted Equation 1 & 2

0.155 ε = 4.26E-06
ε = 2.75E-05
θ = 9.11E-06 rad/m
Modulus of elasticity Ec = 50000 kg/cm^2

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 29

LSSPL/]DMRC/IB 850 /DN-1 DESIGN NOTE FOR IB 850

Y Yθ t0C αt te= Ec( ε0-Yθ-αt) Location

tension 0 0.000E+00 10.600 1.2E-04 -4.455 top of deck slab
tension 0.125 1.139E-06 5.650 6.2E-05 -1.790
comp. 0.230 2.095E-06 1.492 1.6E-05 0.107 bottom of deck slab
comp. 0.500 4.555E-06 0.000 0.0E+00 0.805 web
comp. 1.000 9.110E-06 0.000 0.0E+00 0.577 web
comp. 1.500 1.367E-05 0.000 0.0E+00 0.349 web
comp. 1.750 1.594E-05 0.000 0.0E+00 0.235 web
comp. 2.000 1.822E-05 0.000 0.0E+00 0.121 web
comp. 2.250 2.050E-05 0.000 0.0E+00 0.007 web
tension 1.100 1.002E-05 6.600 7.3E-05 -3.099 bottom of soffit level

LONGSPAN STRUCTURES PVT. LTD PAGE: 30