0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views3 pages

LAS206 Presentation Assessment Rubric

The document is a marking rubric for the LAS206 course presentation assessment, outlining criteria for evaluation across various categories such as disciplinary knowledge, analysis and evaluation, originality, organization, clarity, PowerPoint slides, and nonverbal communication. Each category is graded on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Fail,' detailing specific expectations and performance indicators for students. The rubric serves as a guide for both students and assessors to ensure clarity in grading and expectations.

Uploaded by

mansouranthony77
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views3 pages

LAS206 Presentation Assessment Rubric

The document is a marking rubric for the LAS206 course presentation assessment, outlining criteria for evaluation across various categories such as disciplinary knowledge, analysis and evaluation, originality, organization, clarity, PowerPoint slides, and nonverbal communication. Each category is graded on a scale from 'Excellent' to 'Fail,' detailing specific expectations and performance indicators for students. The rubric serves as a guide for both students and assessors to ensure clarity in grading and expectations.

Uploaded by

mansouranthony77
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Presentation Assessment: Marking Rubric

Course: LAS206
Student Name:

Criteria % Excellent (87- Very good Good (70 - Pass (60- Fail (0-59)
100) (80 -86) 80) 70)

Disciplinar 35 • Student • Mostly • Generally • Only • Mostly


yKnowled demonstrates accurate. accurate and accurate inaccurat
ge full knowledge Includes includes most in a few e and
(more than almost all the of the areas and incomplet
required). information material missing e lacking
• Answered all needed to needed to more than many key
questions with gain a sound gain an two key elements
explanation understandin understandin elements and
and g of the topic. g of the topic. central to ideas.
elaborations. • Student • Able to the topic. • Poorly
answered all answer only • Mostly did researche
the basic not d with
questions, questions. answer many
but did not questions knowledg
elaborate. asked. e gaps.
• Student
cannot
answer
questions
about the
topic.
Analysis & 30 • Clear and • Most • Examples are • Mostly • Lack of
Evaluatio accurate examples generally weak connectio
n demonstration provided are connected to analysis, n of
of the directly main topic and lack ideas.
connection relevant to chosen. of proper • Examples
between the the analysis • Surface level support. missing.
philosophical provided. observations. • More than • No logical
text and case • Some • Some key 3 key transition
study/exampl analysis is evaluations evaluatio s or idea
e chosen. based on missing. ns coherenc
• Logical surface-level • Ideas are missing. y.
connection of observations vague. • Transition
ideas. and mostly between
• Ideas are delves into ideas/exa
supported by complexities mples are
evidence. of the main incoheren
• Attention to topic/theme t.
detail. chosen.
Originality 10 • Brings a high • Bring a good • Bring some • Little • Completel
level of amount of amount of originality y
originality and originality originality or unoriginal
an innovative and a fresh and creativity and
perspective in perspective perspective in their uncreativ
answering the to the field. to the perspecti e in their
question/choic • Engages with question ve. approach
e of topic & thought explored. • Deals to the
analysis. provoking • Considers slightly idea/ques
• Engages issues and problems. with tion at
impressively considers • Common problems hand.
with thought some interpretation and • Does not

1
Criteria % Excellent (87- Very good Good (70 - Pass (60- Fail (0-59)
100) (80 -86) 80) 70)
provoking problems. s. thought- consider
issues and provoking problems
nicely ideas. or
anticipates provoke
limitations/ much
future thought.
problems.
Organizati 10 • Excellent • Good • Adequate • Demonstr • Ideas are
on organization organizationa organization ates organised
which l skills. Some of ideas. serious/po randomly.
includes a ideas could More than 3 or • No effort.
clear thesis, have been re- ideas/elemen organisati
clear intent, organized ts could have onal skills.
follows better for been re-
subtopics as idea organized
presented, coherency/be differently for
clear topic tter better
sentences and explanation. coherency.
transitions
when
appropriate.
Clarity 5 • Clear purpose, • Has some • Attempt to • Poor • Purpose
and main success define main outlining and main
issue is identifying topic tackled, of main topic not
specifically main topic, and purpose. topic/issu clearly
outlined. and defining • Language e. defined.
• Language purpose. used is clear • The • Poor
used is clear • Language in general. language language
and carefully used is used is skills.
worded. mostly clear. sometime • The use
s clear. of slang,
inaccurat
e
vocabular
y,
grammar
mistakes
that
obstruct
meaning.

2
Criteria % Excellent (87- Very good Good (70 - Pass (60- Fail (0-59)
100) (80 -86) 80) 70)
PowerPoin 5 • Excellent use • Very good • Adequate use • Mediocre • Substand
t Slides + of slides to use of slides. of slides to use of ard use of
Submissio convey their • Great use of convey their slides to digital
n message. color, font, message. convey media to
• Color, font, graphics, or • Decent use of their convey
graphics, or effects. color, font, message. their
effects • Clear graphics, or • Unimpres message.
enhance the presentation effects. sive use • Clueless
project. style. • Layout is of color, use of
• Extremely • Adherence to appropriate font, color,
clear and some of the for topic. graphics, font,
understandabl structure of • Presentation or effects, graphics,
e presentation slides style is but not or effects.
style. outlined in mostly clear. terrible. • Presentati
• Use of visual the • Presentati on style is
aids such as presentation on style is poor, and
images, film guide. not very interferes
clips, etc. clear but with
• Adherence to the main ability to
the structure message follow/un
of slides still derstand
outlined in the comes the
presentation across. message.
guide. • No
submissio
n of
slides, or
late
submissio
n.
Nonverbal 5 • Maintaining • Frequently • Reads most • Reads • Student
Communi eye contact reading from of the most of reads all
cation with audience. notes. slides/notes. the the
• Seldom • Voice is clear. • Voice is low slides/not slides/not
returning to • Quick sometimes. es. es.
notes. recovery • Voice is • Volume is
• Voice is clear. from minor low. too low,
mistake. and
monotone
.

You might also like