Here is a step-by-step guide to performing a seismic simulation of high-voltage
instrument transformers using ANSYS, aligned with the IEEE 693 standard:
IEEE 693-Based Seismic Simulation in ANSYS for High-Voltage Instrument
Transformers
Step 1: Define the Objective
Simulate the seismic response of a high-voltage instrument transformer.
Evaluate structural integrity and dynamic behavior under IEEE 693 seismic levels
(Low, Moderate, High).
Step 2: Geometry Modeling
Use ANSYS Mechanical or ANSYS SpaceClaim to model:
Transformer tank
Core and windings (simplified if needed)
Bushings and porcelain/composite insulators
Support structure (if applicable)
Ensure accurate dimensions and mass distribution.
Step 3: Material Properties
Assign realistic material properties:
Steel for tank and core
Porcelain or composite for insulators
Copper for windings (if modeled)
Include nonlinear behavior if needed (e.g., cracking in porcelain).
Step 4: Meshing
Use fine mesh at stress concentration zones (e.g., bushing flanges, tank
corners).
Use coarser mesh in less critical areas to optimize computation time.
Perform mesh convergence study to ensure accuracy.
Step 5: Boundary Conditions
Fix the base of the transformer to simulate anchorage.
Apply gravity load to simulate self-weight.
Include contact definitions between bushings and tank, or insulators and
support.
Step 6: Seismic Input (Time History or Response Spectrum)
Use IEEE 693-defined Required Response Spectrum (RRS) or time history
data.
Apply seismic loads in X, Y, and Z directions (triaxial input).
Use base excitation method to simulate shake table conditions.
Step 7: Modal Analysis
Perform modal analysis to identify natural frequencies and mode shapes.
Ensure that the first few modes are within the range of seismic excitation.
Step 8: Transient Structural Analysis
Run transient dynamic analysis using time history input.
Monitor:
Displacements
Stresses
Accelerations at key points (e.g., top of bushings)
Step 9: Post-Processing
Evaluate:
Maximum stress vs. material yield strength
Displacement limits (especially at bushings)
Frequency shifts (if nonlinear behavior is modeled)
Identify potential failure zones.
Step 10: Validation and Reporting
Compare simulation results with IEEE 693 acceptance criteria:
No structural failure
Functional integrity maintained
Document:
Model setup
Input parameters
Results and interpretation
Compliance statement