Group Bedasa Abera (1) - Thesis Commented
Group Bedasa Abera (1) - Thesis Commented
March 2025
Nekemte, Wallaga, Oromia, Ethiopia
i
Declaration
We, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work entitled assessment of The Assessment The
Effect Of Leadership Style And Organizational Challenges On Business Management In
Case Of Study Of Dashan Bank Nekemte Branch is the result of our dedicated efforts. We affirm
that all sources and materials utilized in this study have been appropriately acknowledged. This
research has been conducted independently, with the exception of the valuable guidance and
suggestions from our research advisor, which have significantly enhanced the quality of our
work.
Researcher’s Name Date Signature
1) ___________________ ________________ ____________
2) ___________________ ________________ ____________
3) ___________________ ________________ ____________
4) ___________________ ________________ ____________
5) ___________________ ________________ ____________
6) ____________________ ___________________ __________
Adviser’s Name Date Signature
__________________ ____ ____________
Dep’t Name
------------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------------
Department council
--------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
First and foremost, praises and thanks to the God, the Almighty,
for his showers of blessings throughout my research work to
complete the research successfully. Next I will like to thank man y
people who have help me in the writing of the thesis and also
population of the organization un der the study who help me in
filling the questionnaires and provide essential information. I woul
d like to extend my heartfelt thanks to my academica Mr.
BEKELEDEBELA(MSc), for theirs wi llingness to provide me
with technical support, relevant materials, and for his invaluable
scientifc advice. Theirs dynamism, vision, sincerity, and
motivation have deeply inspired me. They have taught me the
methodology to carry out the research and to present the research
works as clearly as possible. It was great privilege and honor to
work and study under his guidance. I am extremely gratef
iii
Abstract
In this study, the effect of leadership style on organizational change management was explored in the case
of Dashen Bank. Through an exhaustive literature review, the author learned that the leadership style is one
of the leading factors in managing change in the organizations. However, there is controversy about the key
leadership style for establishing change in the organization. This research project is aimed at finding out
the effect of leadership styles on change management and the dominant predicting leadership style in the
case bank, with a view to enhancing the practice of appropriate leadership and change management. The
study used a descriptive and exploratory research design and used both convenience sampling and
proportional stratified random sampling for interviews and questionnaires respectively. The target
population of the study was 2084 and the sample size collected via questionnaires for further analysis was
252. The research also included the interview results of 6 senior managers of the bank. The qualitative data
was analyzed using content analysis and the data obtained through the questionnaires was analyzed using
SPSS version 21. The association between the independent variables (Transformational, Transactional,
Authoritarian, and Laissez faire leadership styles) and dependent variable (Change management) was
established using. However, the study found out that Laissez-faire leadership had a positive and
insignificant effect on change management. As the strength of the organization dwells much on the
transformational style of leadership, the study recommended that the bank's management apply more of that
and blend it with other leadership styles as needed in order to successfully manage change.
Key words: Transformational leadership, Transactional leadership, Autocratic leadership, Laissez faire
leadership, Change management.
iv
Contents
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM...................................................................................................2
1.3 Objective of the Study..........................................................................................................................3
1.3.1 General Objective..........................................................................................................................3
1.3.2 Specific Objective.........................................................................................................................3
1.4 Research Questions..............................................................................................................................3
1.5 Significance of the Study.....................................................................................................................3
1.6 Scope of the Study...............................................................................................................................4
1.7 Limitations of the Study.......................................................................................................................4
1, 8 Organization of the Research..............................................................................................................4
CHAPTER TWO...........................................................................................................................................6
2.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................6
2.2.1 Leadership Styles..........................................................................................................................6
2.1.1. Transformational Leadership Styles............................................................................................8
2.1.2. Autocratic Leadership style........................................................................................................8
2.1.3 Democratic Leadership style........................................................................................................8
2.2.2. Organizational Performance.........................................................................................................8
2.4 Conceptual Framework......................................................................................................................10
CHAPTER THREE......................................................................................................................................12
3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................12
3.2 Research Design.................................................................................................................................12
3.3 Research Approach............................................................................................................................13
3.4 Sampling Design................................................................................................................................13
3.4.1 Target population........................................................................................................................14
3.4.2, Sampling Technique...................................................................................................................14
3.4.3,Sample Size.................................................................................................................................14
3.5.2 ,Data Collection Tools.................................................................................................................14
3.6 Data Analysis Methods......................................................................................................................15
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................................16
CHAPTER FOUR..........................................................................................................................................17
4. TIME AND BUDGET SCHEDULE...............................................................................................................17
4.1. Tentative Time Schedule.................................................................................................................17
v
4.2. Cost Budget.....................................................................................................................................17
APPENDIX I: QUESTIONNAIRE..............................................................................................................19
vi
CHAPTEONE
1.1BackgroundoftheStudy
Employees who are satisfied with their jobs are more likely to perform at the maximum level.
One of the most effective strategies to boost corporate happiness is to choose a leadership style
that benefits both the corporation and its personnel. Some leadership styles exist, and diverse
scenarios are prevalent in this context. Some people combine styles to suit their needs. Extensive
job descriptions that highlight strategies of achievement are the first step in developing a culture
of accountability. According to Thomas (2002) leadership style is the aspect of a leader’s
personality that inspires subordinates to follow them. In addition, Alexander (2002) explains that
leadership styles are specific actions used by a leader to drive subordinates to fulfill the
organization goal. Bank supervisors occupy a unique role as theme manager or administrator in
change of the bank’s resources in order to fulfill banking objectives.
Leadership is a universal human phenomenon. The study of leadership is not a new phenomenon,
but it is an ancient art. The old civilizations of Egypt and Rome showed examples of leadership
practices. Regardless of the culture, leadership occurs universally among all people (Bass, 2001).
Leadership is one of the most pressing issues and one of the least understood concepts in the
corporate world. The history of leadership encompasses through several paradigm shifts and
voluminous body of knowledge. As a universal activity, leadership is fundamental for effective
organizational and social functioning. The very nature of leadership is its influencing process and
its resultant outcomes. Such process is determined by the leaders and followers’ characteristics,
dispositions, behavior perceptions, attributions and the context wherein the process of
influencing occurs. The moral purpose of leadership is to create an empowered follower that
leads to moral outcomes that are achieved through moral means.
1
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Leadership style cultivated itself as a significant determinant of workers' organizational
Performance together with normal skills familiar by supervisors at various level of progressive
system. Target reaction of individuals to leaders for the most part is identified with the worker’s
attributes and leader's qualities and demonstrated skills. Researchers recommended that a quality
relationship amongst worker and leader or its nonattendance remarkably affects self-regard of
employees in occupation. In like manner leadership styles should be explored to protect the
accomplishments of hierarchical objectives regarding satisfaction. Although correlations
between leadership styles and organizational performance has been studied in a wide variety of
arenas and in similarly extensive range of situations, few of these studies focus on this
relationship in the context of international non-governmental organizations in African context.
Most of the studies concentrate on leadership styles and employees ‘organizational performance.
Different from this absorption, this study had looked at the relationship between leadership styles
and organizational performance in the context of developing country, Ethiopia with specific
concern to Cooperative Bank of Oromia, Ethiopia and discovers the relationship of leadership
styles and organizational performance. Leaders need the ability to lead an organization to
achieve the objective set in the given period of time. However, many organizations have immoral
and unethical banking practices, high labor turnover and inability to meet basic required
obligations. This could be due to a lack of strong leadership. Many organizations' primary goal is
to meet their stated goals, necessitating the need for a skilled leader to effectively manage and
encourage their employees. Unfortunately, several businesses are unaware of their managers'
leadership styles. Similarly, I observed some Cooperative Banks of Oromia employees are not
active enough to serve their customers as they are expected to do. Based on this situation the
researcher is motivated to study the reason behind
this problem whether the leaders play their roll or not
2
1.3 Objective of the Study
3
Their career and achieving their vision. The study can provide information to Dashen Bank
Nekemte Branch on how their leadership style is affecting employees and can help to identify
which leadership style will be appropriate to be effective. It can be beneficial for leaders to
understand which types of leadership style impacts on organizational performance for a better
performance and how employees can also be motivated through proper leadership. It helps as a
reference to similar companies in identifying appropriate leadership styles that can improve
performance of the company and lead the company to success. Adoption of the appropriate style
will help induce trust and loyalty for the organization.
4
the methodology that was applied to achieve the research objectives including primary data and
method of analysis. Chapter four covers the analysis and presentation of data. This chapter
discusses the result obtained in accordance with the research questions. Finally Chapter five
deals with summary of findings, conclusion and recommendations
5
CHAPTER TWO
RELATED LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
In Accordance to the aim of the paper, this chapter is dedicated to present literatures found on the
Online web system and also some preliminary books as well. This Chapter reviews about
organizational performance, the concept of leadership style, different styles of leadership,
theories, empirical review and conceptual framework. Encompassing empirical reviews and
results of some findings will be presented. Finally, conceptual framework of the study will be
offered at the end of the chapter
Share one trait. They exert influence over others around them in order to maximize the value of
The organization's resources, particularly its most valuable and costly human resources and
Capital. This achievement can only be attained and most likely sustained in organizations that
useThe right leadership style or styles at the right moment. The employment of non-coercive
Influence to shape a group is also referred to as leadership. Despite the differences in definitions,
6
These concepts have at least three crucial implications. To begin with, leadership is a process
that Specific individuals engage in (leaders). It is a continuous activity in a company. Second, it
involves other people in the form of subordinates or employees who are influenced by the leader
due to their desire. As a result, subordinates solidify the leader's authority by facilitating the
leadership process. Finally, the achievement of a goal and objectives is the goal of leadership.
There have been a seemingly endless number of definitions produced, but there is one common
thread that runs through all of them: the concept of impact. As a result, leaders exert influence
over others to aid in the achievement of group and organizational goals. However, it should be
noted that using the right leadership style at the right moment is a key factor in achieving
organizational success.“A leadership style is defined as the set of features, traits, and behaviors
that he or she employs when interacting with subordinates” Mitonga-Monga and Coetzee (2012),
Mitonga-Monga &Coetzee. They define leadership as a pattern of managerial action that is
designed to integrate organizational or personal interests and impacts in order to achieve specific
objectives. Harris etal. (2007) have proposed that a leader's style might be described as the type
of interaction he or she uses to get people to work together toward a common purpose or
objective. The manner in which a leader leads is referred to as his or her leadership style. Some
leaders are more concerned with the task at hand than with the people with whom they work,
while others are more concerned with their subordinates' relationships than with the task at hand.
A leader’s style is usually defined by whether he prioritizes work completion or human
interactions.
According to Thomas (2002), leadership style is the aspect of a leader's personality that inspires
Subordinates to follow them. On the other hand, according to Alexander (2002), leadership styles
Are specific actions used by a leader to drive subordinates to fulfill the organization's goals.
Bank Supervisors occupy a unique role as theme manager or administrator in charge of the
bank's
Resources in order to fulfill banking objectives. Formulating goals and objectives, developing
structures, managing and motivating workers, and giving leadership are just a few of them. Mr.
Maxwell (2007) Marily, on the other hand, believes that delivering leadership is a critical aspect
of a leader's job. The leadership style that leaders use to fulfill the above duties will decide
whether or not they are able to complete the task at hand and achieve long-term organizational
goals, as well as whether or not they are able to build and maintain strong relationships with their
employees. Leadership styles can be classified into the following categories, according to
modern leadership styles: Harris et al. (2007) provide examples of leadership styles
7
:(1)Transformational leadership, (2) Transactional leadership (3)Democratic leadership, (4)
Laissez faire leadership and (5) Autocratic leadership.
8
objectives. The organizational performance involves three areas associated with the organization
–financial performance (return on investments, profits etc.), shareholder return economic value
added, total shareholder etc.) And the product/service market performance (market share, sales
etc.) (Gavrea, et al., 2011).Ireland, Cantens & Yasui (2011) explained performance as a dynamic,
requiring judgment and interpretation illustrated by using a causal model that describes how
current actions may affect future results. Performance measurement is basic to companies’
improvement as its measurements are used to control and keep track of how the company is
performing and whether objectives are met. In fact, performance may be understood differently
depend on the person involved in the assessment of the performance. Fu-Jin Wang et al. (2010)
illustrates that both Financial and non-financial factor of performance need to be considered at
the same time while Measurement because non-financial aspects such as employee morale and
product quality are very important for its long term operation. Hofman cited in Fu-Jin Wang et
al. (2010) also Stressed nonfinancial performance measures like customer satisfaction, product
quality or
Employee turnover are too relevant as they indicate the entity’s durable performance. Therefore,
in this study, the performance of the Bank was measured in terms of non financial performance
Measures such as employee job satisfaction, innovation and technology, learning and
Development and employee turnover. These non-financial performance measures are discussed
in the following section. Employee Job satisfaction; According to Kaliski as cited in Brikend
Aziri (2011), job Satisfaction is a worker’s sense of achievement and success on the job. In a
general word it can be perceived to have direct linkage with productivity and personal well-
being. Job satisfaction implies doing a job one enjoys, doing it well and being rewarded for one’s
efforts. Further Implication of job satisfaction goes to enthusiasm and happiness and accordingly
job satisfaction
is the key ingredient that leads to recognition, income, promotion, and the achievement of other
Goals that in turns lead to organizational achievement. Job satisfaction represents an
amalgamation of positive or negative feelings that workers have towards their work. Meanwhile,
when a worker employed in a company, brings with it the needs, desires and experiences which
determinates expectations that he has dismissed. Job satisfaction represents the extent to which
expectations are and match the real awards. Job satisfaction is closely linked to that individual’s
behavior in the work place Davis et al. (1985) cited in (Brikend Aziri, 2011)
9
2.4 Conceptual Framework
Leadership style is defined as the set of features, traits, and behaviors that he or she employs
when interacting with subordinates” Mitonga-Monga and Coetzee (2012), Mitonga-Monga
&Coetzee. They define leadership as a pattern of managerial activity aimed at integrating
organizational or personal interests and affect to achieve defined goals. The conceptual basis for
this study is based on Kurt Lewin's autocratic and democratic model's behavioral leadership
theory. In autocratic leadership, the leader makes decisions, tells employees what to do, and
closely supervises workers, whereas democratic leadership encourages participation in decisions,
works with employees to determine what to do, and does not closely supervise workers
(Koontzand Donnell (1993).According to Bass (1985), followers of transformational leadership
have faith in, appreciate, and respect for the leader, and are inspired to go above and beyond
what is asked of them. Organizational performance, according to Koontz and Donnell (1993), is
an organization’s capacity to meet goals such as high profit, good quality products, and a
significant market share. Based on the objectives of the research and review of existing literature
regarding the relationship between leadership style and organizational performance in case of
Cooperative Bank of Oromia, the study has developed the following framework that is expected
to explain the relationship between leadership style and organizational performance in case of
Cooperative Bank of Oromia in the study area. The following figure depicts the relationship
between the independent and dependent variables, employee’s satisfaction of the study
10
11
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
The previous chapter clearly identifies the knowledge gap which together with the problem
statement shown in chapter one necessitates the conduct of this research. This chapter provides
the details of the research methodology. While the study primary aim is to assess leaders Dashen
Bank Nekemte Branch hip style and analyze the impact of leadership style on organizational
performance in case of Cooperative Bank of Oromia. The research design and methodology
section will clearly define the research design, approaches of the study, population and sampling
design, data type and sources, data collection, data analysis methods finally data validity and
reliability method will be intensively presented.
12
3.3 Research Approach
Creswell (2003) discussed three research approaches, namely quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
Research approaches. In this research quantitative research approach were used so the following
Paragraph is briefly discussing the nature of research approach intend to be use. The study is
quantitative in nature which is generally associated with especially since it is used with
predetermined and highly structured data collection techniques under this study. Thus, the study
used explanatory methods approach as a design in methods in which the researcher collects
Quantitative data analyzes the results, and then uses the results to find conclusion and
recommendation. The study was quantitative where survey research is followed since it provides
quantitative or numeric description of trends, attitudes, or opinions of a population by studying
sample of that population that includes a cross-sectional study using survey questionnaires for
data collection with the intent of generalizing from a sample to a population (Fowler, 2008
13
3.4.1 Target population
A population may be described as items with the traits that one desires to study that can be a
Person, business enterprise, or different that researcher wish to attract medical inferences
Approximately (Kelley, okay., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J., 2003). The goal populations of
The study that I have a look at, turned into 55 managerial and clerical team of workers of dashen
Bank Nekemte Branch 2 branches in nekemte city Researcher selected this target population
due to their accessibility and excessive confidence of acquiring facts.
14
or disagreement to the sentences about the constructs under study.
15
CHAPTE FOUR
This chapter presents the findings, analysis and interpretation of the findings. The discussion of
the findings of this study is also presented in relation to previous leadership and change
management studies.
As described in the previous chapter, the sample size of the study was 336 staff of the bank.
Based on the past experience of the researcher, the distributed number was 24 more than the
sample size, for a total of 360 questioners. However, as shown in table 4.1, Out of the total
sample size, the valid questionnaires collected and used for further analysis were 252 (75
percent).
16
Source: Survey data (2021)
According to Bailey (1987), a response rate of 75 percent is considered valid. Similarly, Babbie
(1990), asserts that a response rate of 50 percent is considered to be adequate. Hence, the
response rate obtained by the study was 75%, which is sufficient to conduct the research.
17
4.3. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
This section provided demographic data such as sex, age group, educational qualification, work
experience, position/job designation and line of business of employees.
Female
24%
Male
76%
As figure 4.1, shows regarding the gender distribution of respondents, the survey had a 24
percent female response rate and a 76 percent male response rate. This suggests that all genders
were fairly represented in the study, relative to the ratio of female to male employed staff in the
organization. Hence, the findings can be concluded to be free of gender bias.
18
4.3.2. Age Distribution of the respondents
Graph [Link] the following graph depicts the age distribution of the respondents. As the response
[51-60] 0.4
Age Group
[41-50] 22.6
[31-40] 53.7
[20-30] 23.6
shows, 53.7 percent were between the ages of [31 and 40], 23.6 percent were between the ages of
[20 and 30], and 22.6 percent were between the ages of [41 and 50] years old. This suggests that
the sample is dominated by menials and followed by Gen X. However, the share of baby
boomers and Gen Z are null and few respectively.
The study tried to determine the respondents' academic qualifications in order to better
understand their qualifications and capacity to offer the information needed by the study.
Masters 41.7
Degree 56.3
Diploma 2.0
19
Accordingly, as graph 4.2 depicts, the majority (56%) had a bachelor's degree as their greatest
level of education, while around 42% had a master's degree, and 2% had diplomas.
Similarly, respondents were asked about their job experience, as graph 4.3 shows, 96 (38.7%)
replied they worked for the bank for 4 to 6 years, 52 (21%) replied they worked for more than 12
years, 40 (16.1%) replied they worked for 7-9 years, 39 (15.7%) replied they worked for 10 to 12
years, and the remaining 21 (8.5%) replied they worked for 1 to 3 years.
>12 21.0
Work Experience
[10-12] 15.7
[7-9] 16.1
[4-6] 38.7
[1-3] 8.5
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0
The result shows that most of the respondents have matured experience within the bank. Hence,
they are in a good position to respond to the research variables with more understanding.
The survey went on to ascertain the respondent's job designation, and as graph 4.4 shows, the
majority (73%) of the respondents’ were professionals, 13.1% were line managers, 11.9% were
middle managers, and 2% were senior managers. Hence, the response rate was represented by all
hierarchies of the bank.
20
Position classification of respondents in %
Professionals 73.0
Finally, in terms of working area assignment, as figure 4.2 shows, 60.3 percent of respondents
worked in the front office, directly interacting with customers, 25 percent worked in the middle
office, closely facilitating front office work processes, and the remaining 14.7 percent worked in
Back office
15%
Front office
Middle office 60%
25%
the back office, which serves as an enabler for all segments. Furthermore, the response rate was
well stratified to assess the case bank from a holistic perspective, instead of collecting one side
21
view of the research variables. Therefore, respondents represented all business lines which are
affected by the changes introduced by the bank.
This section describes statistical results for each dimension of leadership styles, which are
transformational, transactional, Autocratic Laissez-faire, and change management practice of the
bank in terms of percentage, frequency, mean, and standard deviation.
Rating scales
No Items 1 2 3 4 5 Mean St. dev
1 Leaders in Dashen Bank influence the 0.4 3.6 16.3 42.9 36.9 4.12 0.83
followers to accept the change.
2 Leaders in Dashen Bank increase 0.4 4.8 17.1 51.2 26.6 3.99 .816
motivation to change.
3 Leaders use intellectual stimulation to 1.2 7.2 27.1 43 21.5 3.76 .910
make change possible
4 Leaders always instill pride in staff 0.4 11.1 35.7 40.5 12.3 3.53 .863
after achieving a change.
5 Leaders in Dashen Bank articulate 3.6 12 32.7 43.4 8.4 3.41 .931
clearly the future.
6 Leaders in Dashen Bank inspire others 1.2 22 36.4 36 4.4 3.20 .875
to change.
7 Leaders build genuine trust between 3.2 19.9 45.4 27.1 4.4 3.10 .876
them and followers.
8 Leaders adjust and create the culture 4.4 27.4 40.5 23.8 4 2.96 .920
to meet the long term needs for
change.
9 Leaders develop skill of employees to 6.3 32.1 34.9 19 7.5 2.89 1.03
meet the requirement of change.
10 Leaders in the Bank seek different 5.2 34.7 38.2 17.5 4.4 2.81 .934
perspectives before initiating change.
Aggregate Score 3.73 0.65
22
To measure the effect of transformational leadership on change management, the study
employed different statements. The results are presented in table 4.2. The first statement is that
the leaders of Dashen bank influence the followers to accept the change. Accordingly, 36.9% of
respondents strongly agreed with the statement. The majority (42.9%) agreed with the statement
that leaders in the bank influence followers. 16.3% were neutral, 3.6% and 0.4% of respondents
disagreed and strongly disagreed with the statement respectively. The statement's mean was 4.12
with a standard deviation of 0.83.
For the second question, respondents were asked how leaders at Dashen Bank motivate
employees to change. Accordingly, 26.6 percent of respondents strongly agreed, 51.2 percent
agreed, 17.1 percent were indifferent, 4.8 percent disagreed and 0.4 percent strongly disagreed.
The statement's mean was 3.99 with a standard deviation of 0.816. Similarly, in the third
statement, respondents were asked to reply to leaders’ use of intellectual stimulation to facilitate
change. As a result, 21.5 percent strongly agreed, the majority of 43% and 27.1 % expressed
their agreement and neutrality with the statement respectively, and 7.2 % disagreed and 1.2 %
strongly disagreed. The statement's mean was 3.76 with a standard deviation of 0.910.
Regarding the statement that leaders instill pride in staff after achieving a change objective. 12.3
percent strongly agreed, 40.5 percent agreed, 35.7 percent were indifferent, 11.1 percent
disagreed, with this statement and 0.4 percent strongly disagreed. The mean of the statement was
3.53, with a 0.863 standard deviation.
In the fifth question, respondents were asked if the bank's leaders clearly articulated the future.
Consequently, 8.4% strongly agreed, 43.4% agreed with this statement, 32.2% were indifference,
12 % disagreed with the statement and 3.6 % strongly disagreed. The mean of the statement was
3.41, with a 0.931 standard deviation. The sixth statement is that leaders inspire others to change.
Consequently, 4.4 % strongly agreed with this assertion, 36% agreed, 36.4% were indifference,
22% disagreed and 1.2% strongly disagreed with the assertion. The mean of the statement was
3.20 with a standard deviation of 0.875.
With regard to question seven, leaders build genuine trust between them and their followers. 4.4
percent strongly agreed, 27.1 percent agreed, 45.4 percent were indifference, 19.9 percent
disagreed with the statement, and 3.2 percent strongly disagreed. The mean of the statement was
23
3.10, with a 0.876 standard deviation. Similarly, respondents were asked whether leaders adjust
and develop the culture to satisfy the long-term needs for change in the eighth statement. As a
result, 4% strongly agreed, 23.8 percent agreed, 40.5 percent of respondents were interference,
and
27.4 percent disagreed and 4.4 percent strongly disagreed. The mean of the statement was 2.96,
with a 0.920 standard deviation.
In response to the ninth question, respondents were asked if leaders develop employees to gain
the skills to meet the demands of change. In this regard, 7.5 percent strongly agreed, 19 percent
agreed,
34.9 percent were indifferent, 32.1 percent disagreed, and 6.3 percent strongly disagreed with
this assertion. The mean of the statement was 2.89, with a 1.030 standard deviation. For the final
question about this leadership style, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that leaders
in the Bank seek different perspectives before initiating change. Consequently, 4.4% strongly
agreed, 17.5% agreed, the majority (38.2%) was neutral, 34.7 % disagreed and 5.2 % strongly
disagreed with the statement. The statement had a mean of 2.81 and a standard deviation of
0.934.
The last response, in contrast to the findings of Achitsa, Y.A. (2013) at Equity Bank Limited in
Kenya, where the research found that the inclusion of staff in the bank's decision-making process
made a significant majority of interviewees feel involved in the change management process.
The mean of the statement was 3.21, with a 1.02 standard deviation. Similarly, in the second
question, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that leaders in the bank set clear
change goals. Accordingly, 8.2% of respondents strongly agreed with the statement, the majority
of 47.1% expressed their agreement, 27.9% were neutral, and 14.3% disagreed and 2.5%
24
strongly disagreed. The statement's mean was 3.44 with a standard deviation of 0.91.
25
Table 4.3. Descriptive response of Transactional Leadership Style
Rating scales
No Items Mean St. dev
1 2 3 4 5
1 Leaders in the Bank offer rewards for
6.9 19.4 23.8 45.6 4.4 3.21 1.02
achievement of change.
2 Leaders in Dashen Bank set clear
2.5 14.3 27.9 47.1 8.2 3.44 0.91
change goals.
3 The leaders in the Bank are
2 8.9 20.6 45.6 23 3.79 0.96
responsible for goal achievement.
4 Leaders motivate followers towards
4.9 19 26.3 35.2 14.6 3.36 1.09
achievement of change.
5 Leader develops a vision and sells the
6.5 17.3 18.5 43.1 14.5 3.42 1.12
vision to the followers.
6 Leaders in the Bank are interested in
creating conducive environment for 6.4 15.6 35.2 38.8 4 3.18 0.96
change.
Aggregate Score 3.39 0.75
Source: Survey Result (2021)
With regard to statement three, the leaders in the bank are responsible for goal achievement.
Accordingly, 23 percent strongly agreed, 45 percent agreed, 20.6 percent were indifferent, 8.9
percent agreed, and 2 percent strongly disagreed with this statement. The statement's average
was 3.79, with a 0.96 standard deviation. By the same token, respondents were asked to respond
to the assertion that leaders motivate followers towards achievement of change. According to the
results,
14.6 percent strongly agreed, 35.2 percent agreed, 26.3 percent were indifferent, 19 percent
disagreed, and 4.9 percent strongly disagreed. The mean of the statement was 3.36, with a 1.09
standard deviation.
In the fifth question, respondents were asked if the leader creates a vision and sells it to the
followers. As a result, 14.5 percent strongly agreed, 43.1 percent agreed, 18.5 percent were
neutral,
17.3 percent disagreed, and 6.5 percent strongly disagreed with this statement. The mean of the
statement was 3.42, with a 1.12 standard deviation. As a final question about this leadership
style, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that leaders in the Bank are interested in
creating a conducive environment for change. As a result, 4 percent strongly agreed, 38.8%
26
agreed, 35.2
27
percent were indifferent, 15.6 percent disagreed, and 6.4 percent strongly disagreed with the
statement. The statement had a mean of 3.18 and a standard deviation of 0.96.
To measure the effect of the autocratic leadership style on change management, the research
employed different items. The results are displayed in table 4.4. Accordingly, 20.6% of
respondents strongly agreed with the first statement that the leader‘s behavior in the bank focuses
Rating scales
No Items Mean St. dev
1 2 3 4 5
1 Leader‘s behavior in the bank
12.3 29 38.1 20.6 3.67 0.94
focuses on taking control.
2 Leader makes order of the employees
without offering much clarification 23.4 37.9 34.3 4.4 3.20 0.84
and dialogue.
3 The leader involves in
.8 33.6 45.2 17 3.3 2.88 0.81
implementation of projects.
4 Leaders in Dashen Bank are swift in
.8 33.9 50.6 12.2 2.4 2.82 0.74
handling activities.
5 Leader in Dashen Bank uses
2.4 22.7 28.7 36.3 10 3.29 1.00
punishment in case of failure.
6 Tight Leadership style is an effective
5.2 42.4 39.2 11.2 2 2.62 0.82
leadership style.
Aggregate Score 3.07 0.72
Source: Survey Result (2021)
on taking control, the majority of respondents (38%) agreed with this statement, 29% were
neutral with the statement and 12.3% disagreed with the statement. The statement's mean was
3.67 with a standard deviation of 0.94. Similarly, in the second question, respondents were asked
to reply to the statement leader's order of the employees without offering much clarification and
dialogue. Accordingly, 4.4 % of respondents strongly agreed with the statement, 34.3%
expressed their agreement, the majority (37.9%) were neutral with the statement and 23.4 %
disagreed with the statement. The statement's mean was 3.20 with a standard deviation of 0.84.
28
With regard to statement three, the leader is involved in the implementation of projects.
Accordingly, 3.3% of respondents strongly agreed, 17% agreed with this statement, the majority
of respondents (45.2%) were neutral about the statement, 33.6% disagreed and 0.8% strongly
disagreed. The statement’s mean was 2.82 with a standard deviation of 0.81. Likewise, in the
fourth question, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that leaders in the bank are
swift in handling activities. Accordingly, 2.4 % of respondents strongly agreed with the
statement, 12.2% expressed their agreement, the majority (50.6%) were neutral, 33.9% disagreed
and 0.8 % strongly disagreed with the statement. The statement's mean was 2.82 with a standard
deviation of 0.74.
Concerning the fifth statement, the leader of the bank uses punishment in case of failure.
Accordingly, 10% of respondents strongly agreed, the majority of respondents (36.3%) agreed
with this statement, 28.7% were neutral about the statement, 22.7% disagreed and 2.4 % strongly
disagreed. The statement's mean was 3.29 with a standard deviation of 1.00. As a final question
about this leadership style, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that a tight
leadership style is an effective leadership style. Consequently, 2% strongly agreed, 11.2% agreed
with the statement, 39.2% were neutral, the lion share (42.4%) disagreed and 5.2 % strongly
disagreed. The mean of the statement was 2.62 and the standard deviation was 0.82.
To evaluate the effect of laissez-faire leadership on change management, the study employed
different statements. The results are presented in table 4.5. The first statement is that leaders in
the bank avoid making decisions. Accordingly, 23.9% of respondents strongly agreed, the
majority of respondents (53%) agreed with this statement, 19.9% were neutral about the
statement and 3.2% of respondents disagreed with the statement. The statement's mean was 3.98
with a standard deviation of 0.75. Similarly, in the second question, respondents were asked to
reply to the statement leaders in the bank's delay in responding to urgent questions. Accordingly,
34.3% of respondents strongly agreed with the statement, the majority (39.8%) expressed their
agreement, 21.1% were neutral with the statement, 4% disagreed and 0.8% strongly disagreed.
The statement's mean was 4.03 with a standard deviation of 0.83.
With regard to statement three, leaders in the bank use passive management. Accordingly, 11.3%
of respondents strongly agreed, the majority of respondents (40.1%) agreed with this statement,
29
Table 4.5. Descriptive response of Laissez-faire Leadership Style
Rating scales
No Items Mean St. dev
1 2 3 4 5
1 Leaders in the bank avoid making
3.2 19.9 53 23.9 3.98 0.75
decisions.
2 Leaders delay in responding to urgent
.80 4 21.1 39.8 34.3 4.03 0.88
questions.
3 Leaders in the bank use passive
0.4 9.7 38.5 40.1 11.3 3.52 0.83
management.
4 The leader makes no attempt to help
9.6 40.8 43.2 6.4 3.46 0.75
in solving problems.
5 Leaders in the bank renounce their
2.8 14.5 41.1 37.5 4 3.25 .85
leadership.
6 Leader doesn‘t concern themselves
7.6 55 32.7 4.8 3.35 0.68
in the stimulation of subordinates.
Aggregate Score 3.60 0.57
Source: Survey Result (2021)
38.5% were neutral, and 9.7% of respondents disagreed and 0.4% strongly disagreed with the
statement. The statement’s mean was 3.52 with a standard deviation of 0.83. Likewise, in the
fourth question, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that the leader makes no
attempt to help in solving problems. Accordingly, 6.4 % of respondents strongly agreed with the
statement, the majority (43.2%) expressed their agreement, 40.8 % were neutral and 9.6%
disagreed with the statement. The statement's mean was 3.35 with a standard deviation of 0.68.
Concerning the fifth statement, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that leaders in
the bank renounce their leadership. Accordingly, 4% of respondents strongly agreed, 37.5%
agreed with this statement, line share of the respondents (41.1%) were neutral on the statement,
14.5% disagreed and 2.8 % strongly disagreed. The statement's mean was 3.25 with a standard
deviation of 0.85. As a final question about this leadership style, respondents were asked to reply
to the statement that leaders in the bank don‘t concern themselves with the stimulation of
subordinates. Consequently, 4.8% strongly agreed, 32.7% agreed with the statement, the
majority (55%) were neutral and 7.6% disagreed with the statement. The mean of the statement
was 3.35 and the standard deviation was 0.68.
30
4.4.5. Change Management
Finally, to evaluate change management, the research employed different items. The results are
displayed in table 4.6. Accordingly, 11.3% of respondents strongly agreed with the first
statement that there is ownership change in the bank. Accordingly, 34.3% agreed with this
statement, the majority (37.5%) were neutral about the statement, 14.9 % disagreed and 2%
strongly disagreed with the statement. The statement's mean was 3.38 with a standard deviation
of 0.94. Similarly, in the second question, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that
leaders in the bank are responsible for the change process. Accordingly, 21.7 % of respondents
strongly agree with the statement, the majority of respondents (54.9 %) expressed their
agreement, 9% were neutral with the statement, 9.4% disagreed and 4.9 % strongly disagreed.
The statement's mean was 3.79 with a standard deviation of 1.04.
Rating scales
No Items Mean St. dev
1 2 3 4 5
1 There is ownership of change in the
2 14.9 37.5 34.3 11.3 3.38 0.94
bank.
2 Leaders in the bank are responsible
4.9 9.4 9 54.9 21.7 3.79 1.04
for the change process.
3 Change helps Dashen bank to become
2.8 25.7 24.9 36.5 10 3.25 1.03
more effective.
4 Leaders develop skill of employees
1.6 20.2 16.1 40.3 21.8 3.6 1.08
to meet the change objectives.
5 Leaders seeks different perspectives
2.8 13.9 20.6 52.8 9.9 3.53 0.94
before initiating change
Aggregate Score 3.51 0.72
Source: Survey Result (2021)
With regard to statement three, change helps Dashen bank to become more effective.
Accordingly, 10% of respondents strongly agreed, the majority of respondents (36.5%) agreed,
24.9% were neutral about the statement, 25.7 % disagreed and 2.8% strongly disagreed. The
statement’s mean was 3.25 with a standard deviation of 1.03.
Concerning the fifth statement, leaders develop the skills of employees to meet the change
objectives. Accordingly, 21.8% of respondents strongly agreed, the majority of respondents
31
(40.3%) agreed with this statement, 16.1% were neutral about the statement, 20.2% disagreed
and 1.6% strongly disagreed. The statement's mean was 3.6 with a standard deviation of 1.08. As
a final question of this dimension, respondents were asked to reply to the statement that leaders
seek different perspectives before initiating change. Consequently, 9.9% strongly agreed, the
majority (52.8%) agreed with the statement, 20.6 % were neutral, 13.9% disagreed and 2.8 %
strongly disagreed. The mean of the statement was 3.53 and the standard deviation was 0.94.
Interviews were conducted to supplement and compare the information gathered via
questionnaires. The interviews in this study were intended because the interviewees provided
details about some specific areas of study. Accordingly, the interview is divided into three
sections. The first section presents the leadership styles practiced by Dashen Bank and the
attributes of each leadership style. The second section reveals the effectiveness of the practiced
leadership styles in change management, and the final section presents the best leadership styles
proposed by the interviewee for managing change in the bank.
The respondents of the interview were six senior managers of the bank who have matured
experience and knowledge of the research title. The interviewee's responses are denoted by
participant number (PT-1) for the first senior Manager, 2 for the second senior manage (PT-2),
and so on. The following is a summary of their responses.
The first question was targeted at identifying the leadership style adopted by the bank.
Accordingly, out of six respondents interviewed, three managers (PT 1-3) or 50% of respondents
revealed that the leadership style practiced in the bank was transformational leadership. The
main attributes they described for the claimed leadership style include: inspiring followers to
look beyond their own interests for the good of the team and the organization, influencing
followers, developing and communicating a vision, motivating employees specifically at the
commencement of the change initiative, trying to convince the participants of the change of the
need for the change, and acting as an agent of change even if somehow they lack consistency in
this regard. For a similar question, Participant 4 (PT-4), replied that the leadership style practiced
by the bank is Laissez faire and the attributes he has put for his claim are lack of determination,
focus, and tone setting at the top, thereby limiting buy-in by participants in pushing the
32
change towards the desired
33
objective. Likewise, participant 5, revealed the practiced style was transactional leadership and
his manifestation of his claim included that leaders are responsible for goal achievement, setting
clear change goals, and offering rewards for achievement of change. Finally, for the same
question, Participant 6, revealed the absence of a specific leadership style adopted by the bank,
and he substantiated his assertion by referring to the lack of a clearly stipulated style as a bank
and adding his own beliefs that leadership styles vary with the personalities of the leaders.
The second question the interviewees were asked to reply to the effectiveness of the leadership
style in change management at the bank. Accordingly, the majority of respondents (PT 1-3 and
Participant 5) stated that the bank's leadership style is producing positive results. The basic
elements of their positive perceptions include people management, motivation, employee
development programs, and some of the benefit packages as an encouraging practice of the
bank's leadership. Nevertheless, they have some doubts about change management sustainability.
They specifically specified their reservation by stating that in most of the change introduction
phases, the leadership team is fully involved and inspires others to implement it, and in the
process, they will disappear. Hence, they reflected the lack of sustainment of the momentum of
the change. Two participants, PT 4 and PT 6, revealed their reservations about the effectiveness
of the leadership style on change management and their arguments for their doubts include lack
of attention to the change management issues, absence of a well-defined process for managing
the change, lack of identifying the appropriate leadership style relevant for the business, delays
in projects, lack of proper communication channels on the change agenda, power distance, and
lack of professionals in the area, These are some of the issues expressed by the respondents.
The final question the interviewee was asked to reply to the best leadership style for managing
change in Dashen bank? Consequently, almost all the participants except participant 4
recommended the transformational type of leadership style as the best style for managing
change. They have justified their recommendation by expressing that a transformational
leadership style avoids lack of determination, focus, and tone setting. It encourages subordinates
to think outside the box, and propose innovative ideas in a competitive business, it emanates
from the change intent clarity, it tries to influence and motivate employees. On the contrary, for
the same question, Participant 4 revealed that if the change management practice of the bank is to
be effective, a flexible leadership style is prudent based on the change intent instead of a
one-fit for-all
34
prescriptive style. This is because, in some instances, a particular type of leadership may not be
appropriate for managing change.
The correlation matrix is used to determine the degree to which changes in one variable are
connected to changes in another. The correlation coefficient should be in the range of -1 to +1,
with -1 denoting perfect negative correlation, +1 denoting perfect positive correlation, and 0
denoting no connection (Kothari and Garg, 2014). These values indicate both the direction and
36
size of the relationship. According to Cohen (1988), coefficients of correlation (r) ranging from
0.10 to 0.29 may indicate a weak relationship, ranging from 0.30 to 0.49 may indicate a
moderate level of relationship, and (r) ranging from 0.50 to 1.00 may indicate a strong
relationship.
As Table 4.7 shows in the above table, there is a significant positive correlation between
transformational leadership style and change management at an r value of 0.713. There was also
a significant positive correlation between transactional leadership style and change management
at an r value of 0.576. There was a weak positive correlation between autocratic leadership and
change management at an r value of 0.149 and there was a positive correlation between the
Laissez-faire leadership style and change management at an r value of 0.169. The table shows
that the majority of the research factors had a positive impact on the dependent variable.
The purpose of normality testing is to determine whether a data set is well-modeled by a normal
distribution. The test is used to determine how likely a random variable in a data collection is to
be normally distributed. The significance tests and relationships between the variables are
distorted when study variables are not normally distributed (Grace, 2019). When the normality
assumption is violated, the explanation and implications are not valid or reliable (Razi and Wah,
2011). The reason for this is that regression analyses assume normal distributions. Various tests
can be used to check for normality. One of the methods used to test normality is called the
(probability– probability plot). The cumulative probability of a variable is plotted against the
cumulative probability of a given distribution in the graph. The variable is normally distributed if
values fall on the diagonal of the plot, but departures from the diagonal indicate deviations from
normality (Field, 2005).
This study adopted the probability–probability plot test and the findings are presented in
(Appendix 1). Thus, we can deduce that the assumption of a normally distributed error term was
not breached.
37
4.7.2. Multicollinearity Test
Multicollinearity is a statistical event in which two or more research variables are substantially
associated with each other in a multiple regression model. This indicates that one of the variables
is likely to be linearly projected from the others with a high degree of precision (Grace, 2019).
According to Gujarati (2011), if there is one or more such relationships among the regressors, we
call them multi-collinear or collinear. The standard errors increase as the multicollinearity
increases.
Coefficients a
Model Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance VIF
Transformational Leadership .640 1.563
Transactional Leadership .630 1.586
1
Autocratic Leadership .937 1.067
Laissez-faire Leadership .958 1.043
a. Dependent Variable: Change Management
38
4.1. Introduction
Comment: The introduction is clear but could benefit from a brief overview of the key findings
that will be discussed in this chapter.
4.2. Response Rate
Correction: "questioners" should be corrected to "questionnaires" for consistency.
Comment: Consider adding a brief explanation of why the response rate is significant in
research.
Table 4.1. Response Rate of the Study
Correction: Ensure consistency in terminology (e.g., "No of returned Response" should be
"Number of Returned Responses").
Comment: It might be helpful to clarify what "Front office," "Middle office," and "Back
office" mean in the context of the bank.
4.3. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
Comment: This section is well-organized but could use subheadings for better readability. For
example, use "4.3.1 Gender Distribution" instead of "4.3.1. Gender Distribution of the
respondents."
4.3.1. Gender Distribution of the Respondents
Correction: "the survey had a 24 percent female response rate and a 76 percent male response
rate" could be rephrased for clarity: "The survey recorded a response rate of 24% from
females and 76% from males."
4.3.2. Age Distribution of the Respondents
Correction: "As the response" appears to be an incomplete sentence. It should be rephrased or
completed.
Comment: Consider including a brief analysis of the implications of the age distribution
findings.
4.3.3. Academic Qualification
Correction: "the majority (56%) had a bachelor's degree as their greatest level of education"
could be rephrased to "The majority (56%) of respondents held a bachelor's degree, while
approximately 42% had a master's degree, and 2% held diplomas."
4.3.4. Work Experience of Respondents
Comment: It would be helpful to add a summary sentence that interprets the significance of
39
the work experience data.
4.4. Descriptive Statistics of the Study Variables
Comment: Introduce this section with a brief explanation of why descriptive statistics are
important for understanding the study variables.
4.4.1. Transformational Leadership
Correction: Ensure consistent formatting in the table. For example, "St. dev" should be
spelled out as "Standard Deviation" in the header.
Comment: Consider summarizing the key insights from the table after presenting it, rather
than just listing the results.
4.4.2. Transactional Leadership Style
Comment: Similar to the previous section, summarize the implications of the findings after
presenting the table.
4.4.3. Autocratic Leadership Style
Correction: "the majority of respondents (38%) agreed with this statement" should specify
what statement is being referred to for clarity.
4.4.4. Laissez-Faire Leadership
Comment: The analysis could be enhanced by discussing how laissez-faire leadership might
impact change management negatively or positively.
4.4.5. Change Management
Correction: In "the statement’s mean was 3.25 with a standard deviation of 1.03," consider
rephrasing for clarity: "The mean score for this statement was 3.25, with a standard deviation
of 1.03."
4.5. Qualitative Data Analysis
Comment: The introduction of qualitative data is good, but consider providing more context
on how qualitative data complements quantitative findings.
4.6. Inferential Statistics or Correlation of the Variables
Correction: "the correlation coefficient should be in the range of -1 to +1" could be rephrased
for clarity: "The correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to +1, where -1 indicates a perfect
negative correlation, +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation, and 0 indicates no
correlation."
Comment: Summarize the implications of the correlation findings for leadership and change
management.
40
4.7. Test for Assumptions of Regression Model
4.7.1. Normality Test
41
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1. Introduction
In this chapter, the study's findings on the effect of leadership styles on change management in
the case bank are carefully described; appropriate conclusions are taken from the findings and
the study attempts to advance pertinent recommendations. The dependent variable is change
management and the independent variables are transformational leadership style, transactional
leadership style, autocratic leadership and laissez-faire leadership style.
In a similar vein, the descriptive study findings for transactional items questions respondents
revealed that leaders of the bank develop and sell the vision to their followers, set clear change
42
goals, are responsible for goal achievement, create a conducive environment for change, and
offer rewards for achievement of change, all of which reveal a mean score of 3.18 and above,
which are positive and encouraged.
To establish the effect of Autocratic leadership on change management in the case bank, the
regression study revealed that autocratic leadership and change management had a significant
positive linear relationship. According to the findings, autocratic leadership has a significant
effect on change management.
On the same subject, the descriptive study findings for Autocratic leadership questions
respondents revealed that leaders of the bank focus on taking control, are swift in handling
activities, involved in implementation of projects, make orders without clarification and use
punishment in case of failure, all of which reveal a mean score of 3.18 and above, which is
positive and encouraged. However, the last item, the effectiveness of the autocratic leadership
style in change management, has a mean score of 2.6, which needs further effort to grab the full
benefit of the style in an appropriate context.
To determine the effect of laissez-fair leadership on change management in the case bank, the
regression study revealed that laissez-faire leadership and change management had a positive but
insignificant linear relationship. According to the findings, laissez-faire leadership has an
insignificant effect on change management.
43
5.3. Conclusion
The study found that the bank employed a variety of leadership styles in the change management
process. Transformational leadership's effect on change management is positive and significant.
Hence, transformational leadership caused change management to be smoothly implemented in
the bank. Based on the above findings, transformational leadership styles had the highest
predictor power for change management in Dashen Bank S.C.
The study also concluded that the transactional leadership style had an effect on the change
management of Dashen bank. According to the findings, the effect of transactional leadership on
change management is positive and significant.
Finally, the study concluded that the effect of the laissez-faire leadership style on change
management is positive but insignificant.
5.4. Recommendation
Based on the findings of the study to enhance the success of change management, the following
recommendations have been proposed to the case bank:
As per the finding of the study the bank employed a variety of leadership styles in the
change management process. However, as the effect of transformational leadership is
greater than the other styles which affect change management positively and significantly,
the bank recommended to strengthening the transformational style so as to affect the success
of change in a sustainable way.
Given the importance of proper leadership during the process of change management in an
organization, it is essential to employ proper leadership assessment in the leadership
recruitment process in order to identify transformative leaders so as to achieve the change
44
management objective. In line with this, the bank needs to direct its development investment
towards capacitating this leadership style to implement the change effectively.
The study found out that the mean score of leaders in developing the skills of employees to
meet the requirements of change is lower in transformation leadership questions. As training
and development improve employees' ability to do their job as well as help to facilitate the
effective implementation of the desired changes, the bank recommended to adequately train
all employees on the need for change whenever the bank introduces new initiatives, so as to
completely reap the benefits of changes.
Similarly the study found the limitedness of view involvement in the change process.
Hence, the leader recommended to participate employees to provide their perspectives on
the new change initiatives of the bank. This is because those who contribute their ideas early
in the change process will feel more ownership, act as change champions, reduce resistance
to change, and help to sustain change initiatives. In line with this, Dashen bank should craft
a structured communication approach to create an effective information flow that reduces
the lack of knowledge about the change agenda.
With regard to the change management office, in order to play the central role in change
facilitation and expedite the success of the change, the bank's change management office
requires prior focus on structural set up, assignment of trained professionals, and employee
development programs including exposure visits.
Last but not least, the bank needs use a variety of leadership styles during the change
management process, including transformational, transactional, and autocratic leadership
styles. This is because, in this study, though the dominant predictor is transformational
leadership, except for the laissez-faire leadership style, the other leadership styles were
proven to be effective in bringing about change in Dashen Bank S.C. Hence, among the
45
leadership
46
styles found to be significant, Dashen bank should employ different styles depending on the situation,
so as to reinforce the need for change.
The study investigated the effect of leadership styles on change management in the case of Dashen
Bank S.C. more of research can be done on how other leadership styles affect change
management in other banks within Ethiopia. Further research can also be done on how leadership
styles affect change management in the banking industry of the nation.
Some comments and suggestions for corrections and improvements to Chapter Five, focusing
on clarity, structure, and grammar:
5.1. Introduction
Comment: The introduction effectively sets the stage for the chapter. Consider briefly
summarizing the main findings that will be discussed in the summary.
5.2. Summary of Findings
Correction: In the phrase "the study revealed that transformational leadership and change
management had a significant positive relationship," consider rephrasing to "the study
revealed a significant positive relationship between transformational leadership and change
management."
Comment: The section is informative but could benefit from clearer transitions between the
different leadership styles. Consider using bullet points or subheadings for each leadership
style to enhance readability.
Example Structure:
Transformational Leadership:
Significant positive relationship with change management, but one area needs improvement.
Laissez-Faire Leadership:
49
REFERENCES
Achitsa, Y.A. (2013). Leadership and management of strategic change at equity bank limited
Kenya.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research.
New York: Free Press
Bass, B. &Riggio, R. (2006). Transformational leadership 2nd Ed. New York: Psychology Press.
Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Bailey, K.D. (1987) Methods o
Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Befekadu, Z. and Belayneh, K. (2020). The Link between Leadership Style, Organizational
Change Perceptions and Job Satisfaction at the Ethiopian Electric Utility. Ethiopian Journal of
the Social Sciences and Humanities (EJOSSAH): V. 16, No. 2
Bhal, K., & Dadhich, A. (2011). Impact of Ethical Leadership and Leader-Member Exchange on
Whistle Blowing: The Moderating Impact of the Moral Intensity of the Issue. Journal of
Business Ethics, 103(3), 485-496.
Bunmi. O (2007). Effect of Leadership Style on Job-Related Tension and Psychological Sense of
Community in Work Organizations: A Case Study of Four Organizations in Lagos State,
Nigeria, Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 4 (2).
Caldwell, C. and Hayes, L. (2007). Leadership, Trustworthiness, and the Mediating Lens.
Journal of Management Development, 26(3), 261–278.
Čater, T., Lang, R., & Szabo, E. (2013). Values and leadership expectations of future managers:
Theoretical basis and methodological approach of the GLOBE Student project. Journal for East
European Management Studies, 18(4), 442-462.
Cohen, J.W. (1988). Analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
50
Dahlan, A. N. (2009, August). The Critical Success Factors for the Effective Performance of Malaysian
Government Linked Companies. MA thesis. Malaysian: Southern Cross University.
Dashen Bank S.C. 24th Annual report for the year ended June 30, 2020. Davis and
51
AFRICA BEZA COLLEGE NEKEMTE CAMPUS
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
APPENDIX I: QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear respondent, we are management of student at Africa beza college and we are presently
carrying out are search work for my final thesis, on the topic of impact of leadership style on
organizational performance, a case study of Assessment The Effect Of Leadership Style And
Organizational Challenges On Business Management In Case Of Study Of Dashan Bank
Nekemte Branch You have been carefully chosen as one with capacity to help in gathering this
information that will contribute to the expected results of this research. All the information
provided will be treated with utmost confidentiality it deserves and it will strictly be used for
academic research.
Thanks for your anticipated cooperation.
NB: The information collected is only for academic purpose it could be promised that all
information you provide would be strictly confidential.
PART I. PERSONAL DATA
1. Which branch of the banks do you work for?
2. Are you a male or female?
3 . What is your age?
4. How long have you been in this bank?
5. What is your current grade or level?
6. What is your job designation or title?
PART II. Close-Ended Questionnaires
1. Leadership Style
1, Strongly Disagree 2, Dis Agree 3, Neuteral 4 Agree 5, Strongly Agree
AUTOCRATIC LEADERSHIP STYLE 5 4 3 2 1
The leader bestowed rewards and gives
punishments to motivate employees to
achieve organizational objectives.
2 The leader makes all the major decisions.
52
3, The leader doesn’t get too involved with
the team and doesn’t have conversations
with them frequently.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
STYLE
53
11 The leader encourages group
conversations.
12 There’s frequent and supportive
communication from the leader to the rest
of the staff
General comments
Title Page
- Title Formatting: Ensure the title is properly capitalized and formatted. Change to: "The Effect of Leadership Style and
Organizational Challenges on Business Management: A Case Study of Dashen Bank Nekemte Branch."
- Grammar: Change “ARESEARCH PAPER SUBMITTED TO DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT IN PARCIAL
FULFILIMENT FOR REQUIREMENT OF BACHILER OF ART DEGREE IN MANAGEMENT” to “A RESEARCH PAPER
SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
THE BACHELOR OF ARTS DEGREE IN MANAGEMENT.”
- Advisor Name: Correct “Advisor” and ensure proper formatting (e.g., “Advisor: Mr. Bekele Debela, MSc”).
- Spacing: Ensure consistent spacing between sections and names for better readability.
Declaration
- Title Capitalization: Change “Assessment of The Assessment The Effect Of Leadership Style And Organizational Challenges On
Business Management In Case Of Study Of Dashan Bank Nekemte Branch” to “The Effect of Leadership Style and
Organizational Challenges on Business Management: A Case Study of Dashen Bank Nekemte Branch.”
- Grammar: Change “We, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work entitled assessment of The Assessment The Effect Of
Leadership Style And Organizational Challenges On Business Management In Case Of Study Of Dashan Bank Nekemte Branch is
the result of our dedicated efforts” to “We, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work entitled 'The Effect of Leadership Style
and Organizational Challenges on Business Management: A Case Study of Dashen Bank Nekemte Branch' is the result of our
dedicated efforts.”
- Signature Section: Ensure that the signature lines are formatted consistently, and consider adding a line for the advisor's
signature and date.
Acknowledgment
- Clarity: Change “praises and thanks to the God, the Almighty” to “I would like to express my gratitude to God, the Almighty.”
- Grammar: Change “Next I will like to thank man y people who have help me” to “Next, I would like to thank many people who
have helped me.”
- Punctuation: Ensure proper punctuation throughout, especially at the end of sentences. For example, change “my academica Mr.
BEKELEDEBELA(MSc)” to “my academic advisor, Mr. Bekele Debela (MSc).”
- Clarity: The sentence “I am extremely gratef” is incomplete. Change it to “I am extremely grateful for all they have offered me.”
Abstract
- Clarity: Change “the effect of leadership style on organizational change management was explored in the case of Dashen Bank”
to “This study explores the effect of leadership style on organizational change management at Dashen Bank.”
- Grammar: Change “However, there is controversy about the key leadership style for establishing change in the organization” to
“However, there is controversy regarding the key leadership style that effectively facilitates change within organizations.”
- Clarity: The phrase “the dominant predicting leadership style in the case bank” should be rephrased for clarity, e.g., “the
dominant leadership style influencing change management at the bank.”
Contents
- Formatting: Ensure consistent formatting for headings and subheadings, including spacing and alignment. For example, use "1.2
Statement of the Problem" instead of "1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM."
- Chapter Numbering: Ensure that chapters are numbered correctly and consistently throughout.
54
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
- Clarity: Change “One of the most effective strategies to boost corporate happiness is to choose a leadership style that benefits
both the corporation and its personnel” to “Choosing a leadership style that benefits both the organization and its employees is one
of the most effective strategies to enhance workplace satisfaction.”
- Grammar: Change “According to Thomas (2002) leadership style is the aspect of a leader’s personality that inspires subordinates
to follow them” to “According to Thomas (2002), leadership style refers to the aspects of a leader’s personality that inspire
subordinates to follow.”
- Clarity: The phrase “the study of leadership is not a new phenomenon, but it is an ancient art” should be rephrased for clarity,
e.g., “The study of leadership is not a recent development; rather, it is an ancient practice.”
56
4.4 Descriptive Statistics of the Study Variables
- Comment: Introduce this section with a brief explanation of why descriptive statistics are important for understanding the study
variables.
5.3 Conclusion
- Clarity: Change “the study found that the bank employed a variety of leadership styles in the change management process” to
“The study found that the bank utilized various leadership styles in managing change.”
5.4 Recommendations
- Clarity: Number the recommendations for easier reference and clarity.
References
- Formatting: Ensure that all references are formatted consistently according to a specific citation style (e.g., APA, MLA).
- Completeness: Check that all cited works are included in the reference list, and ensure proper citation for all sources.
Appendix
- Clarity: Ensure that the introduction to the appendix is clear and concise.
- Formatting: Use consistent formatting for questions, ensuring clarity in response options.
57