Theory Z - Japanese Vs American Vision
Theory Z - Japanese Vs American Vision
The fundamental difference in organizational systems is neither in the formal structure nor in
the size nor centralization.
Lifetime employment:
The norm is that a Japanese company hires once a year. Those who join
the company has their job secured until they are 55 years old, at which point they must retire if not
they belong to the high administrative levels.
They receive an amount equivalent to about five years of salary. To understand better the
the system should analyze a bit of the history of Japanese companies up until before World War II.
World War. They were grouped in structures called Zaibatsu.
Bilateral monopoly does not occur in the West, as there is a distrust regarding having a single one.
supplier of some input. In Japan, that does not exist, which turns these monopolies into a
a factor that significantly increases productivity. Although the Zaibatsu ceased to exist after
of the War, its spirit was preserved.
Japanese companies finance their own social security system in which they do not participate.
directly the government. The employees who are retiring at the age that corresponds
to do it, they are being relocated to smaller companies, either in satellites or companies
adults as appropriate and continue to provide their services for another period. The chain
It is Bank-Companies. Large-Companies. Satellites. Only those that withdraw from companies. Satellites have nowhere to go.
to be relocated. On the other hand, the Ministry of Interior Industry and Commerce is the one who can locate
to its retired employees in a bank.
- There are many temporary employees, mostly women, who are laid off.
the bad times. These serve as a buffer to protect the work of men
they are lifetime employees.
The combination of these factors reduces uncertainty and allows male employees
enjoy your lifelong work. Other factors: Trust, Loyalty to the firm, Commitment of
Individual to their work. (They are based on Theory Z.)
Another fundamental difference of Japanese organizations lies in their approach to evaluation and
promotion. The evaluation process is extremely slow, taking up to 10 years for
An executive receives an important promotion. During that period, people at the same level
they will receive the same promotions and salary increases.
The slowness of the process hinders short-term corporate games (although it does not eliminate them).
completely). An attitude open to cooperation, performance, and evaluation is fostered,
well, it favors the possibility that the actual performance level will finally come to light. The
young executives are not attracted to building a career at the expense of others, nor to pressuring to
that decisions be made.
The distribution of physical spaces in a Japanese office supports that attitude towards the
performance evaluation. Huge rooms where everyone works together and everyone is
aware of what others do.
The slowness in the formal processes of evaluation and promotion seems completely unacceptable.
for North Americans, not only because they desire quick feedback and progress, but
because it seems to prevent important positions from being assigned to the most capable
principle. They also point out the incongruence between formal titles and real responsibilities: the
more skilled individuals quickly receive responsibilities, however, promotion only comes
when they have demonstrated more deeply what they are capable of doing. On the other hand, the
who have already proven their ability and contributed to success in the past are assured the title and a
better salary, despite the threat posed by someone younger.
How can young employees be encouraged to willingly accept these greater responsibilities?
without a proportional remuneration? Through the working groups. They belong to several groups
at the same time, it generates a strong sense of belonging and commitment that have an impact on their
behavior. The support and approval of their peers is a factor that affects
powerful attitudes, motivation and behavior, more than salary, promotions and control
hierarchical.
The Japanese organization only accepts young people who are still in the formative stage of
his life, makes them participate in multiple groups and, in this way, instills in them the feeling of
solidarity and camaraderie.
The transcendental thing then is not the reward or evaluation, but the subtle impression that it leaves.
individual among his peers, whom it is impossible to deceive.
3) Non-specialized professional paths (Trajectory)
The Japanese system does not have individuals with detailed knowledge of an industry.
specifically, rather uses the constant rotation of positions to ensure that its executives are high
level being experts in harmoniously relating each function, specialty, and office of the
company.
Studies conducted showed that in the USA, the trajectory of top executives indicates that they do not
they have performed more than two functions on average. This has the problem that, when
To develop a whole life in a specific area, one can lose sight of the needs.
global of a firm and focus on that specific field.
In the USA, one builds a career in various groups, but in the same specialty; in Japan, one
makes a career in various specialties, but in a single organization. Then, the executives
Japanese people are not worried about having to look for work as they have it secured. The
Japanese do not specialize in a specific field, they specialize in an organization, in
learn how to make a unique and specific business work as well as possible.
The most respected leaders are those in charge of the staff, a radically different situation.
opposite to that of American organizations.
Unlike the North American system, which is based on the establishment of specific objectives.
intended to evaluate performance, the basic control mechanism in Japanese companies
it is encompassed in a management philosophy that describes the objectives and procedures
aimed at achieving them.
The objectives represent the values of the owners, employees, customers, and authorities.
governmental. The procedures to achieve these objectives are determined by a
series of beliefs regarding the type of solutions that should be taken and that tend to yield good results
results in the industry or in the company. Those who manage to capture the essence of this philosophy of
values and beliefs, can infer a number of specific goals that fit the
changing conditions. These goals will be consistent among different individuals.
The most notable aspect: participation in the decision-making process. It is different from the style of
setting objectives in a participatory way. (No more than 10 people).
In the Japanese case, everyone who will be directly involved in the decision participates.
There can be many. Usually, a team of 3 people is in charge of talking with
everyone until a true consensus is reached. Despite the longer time required,
There is a greater likelihood that everyone will fully support the decision.
When an important decision must be made, the preparation of the proposal is entrusted to the
younger and less experienced person. In this way, vitality is not lost nor is it lost the
change process. Of course, the executives know what the best decisions may be and
the young man strives to the maximum to find them. The same values and beliefs are instilled.
mistakes generate, in addition, good ideas.
This process takes place within the framework established by a philosophy, beliefs, and a
harmonically shared values, which justifies why so many people participate fully and
effective results are achieved.
In Japan, no one has individual responsibility for a particular area, but rather a group does.
assume joint responsibility for tasks. A very important reason that justifies the
collective assignment of responsibility is that bottlenecks are avoided when one of the
employees cannot fulfill their part of the work.
Collective values
It is the aspect that seems most incomprehensible to Westerners: orientation towards values.
shared, especially the collective sense of responsibility.
Examples indicate that Japanese workers feel uncomfortable about the idea of acting.
individually to improve production. This collectivism is not a goal for which one has
neither a corporate goal to achieve, rather, it is a natural process that makes it so that not
nothing significant happens as a result of individual effort. Anything important is
it derives from a group effort.
Holism: an integrated whole has an independent reality and is greater than the sum of its parts.
The Japanese company forms inclusive relationships. A series of mechanisms provides the
social support and the necessary release to maintain emotional balance.
Social and economic life is integrated into a unique whole, then the relationship between individuals is
intimate. There are multiple bonds that unite them.
JAPANESE COMPANIES COMPARED TO NORTH AMERICAN ONES
( Type Z ) ( Type A )
A different tradition
Japan has a lifestyle that reflects the image of a nation whose inhabitants maintain a
homogeneity in terms of race, history, language, religion, and culture. They had to learn to
to survive and to work together in harmony. Thus arose a transcendent social value: the importance
of the individual as a human being, that is to say, to subordinate individual preferences to the well-being of the
group and know that personal needs will never take precedence over the interests of others.
---oo0oo---