0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views14 pages

SAP2000 NTC 2018 Beam-Column Analysis

The document presents a software verification example using SAP2000 for a wide flange member under combined compression and bending, following the Italian NTC-2018 design code. It details the geometry, material properties, loading conditions, and technical features tested, along with a comparison of results from the software and independent hand calculations, showing exact agreement. The conclusion confirms that the software's outputs align perfectly with the independent results.

Uploaded by

suncxo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views14 pages

SAP2000 NTC 2018 Beam-Column Analysis

The document presents a software verification example using SAP2000 for a wide flange member under combined compression and bending, following the Italian NTC-2018 design code. It details the geometry, material properties, loading conditions, and technical features tested, along with a comparison of results from the software and independent hand calculations, showing exact agreement. The conclusion confirms that the software's outputs align perfectly with the independent results.

Uploaded by

suncxo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000


REVISION NO.: 2

NTC 2018 Example 002

WIDE FLANGE MEMBER UNDER COMBINED COMPRESSION & BENDING

EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
In this example a continuous beam-column is subjected to factored axial load P =
1400 kN, y-axis bending moment My = 200 kN-m, and z-axis bending moment of
Mz = 100 kN-m. This example was tested using the Italian NTC-2018 steel frame
design code. The design capacities are compared with independent hand
calculated results.

GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING


Y-Axis Z-Axis
Z-Z
My,top
Mz,top

Y-Y
L P
A A
Mz,bot
My,bot Section A-A

L = 0.4 m

Material Properties Loading Design Properties


E = 210x103 MPa P = 1400 kN fy = 235 MPa
v = 0.3 Mz,top = 100 kN-m Section: 457x191x98 UB
G = 80769 MPa Mz,bot = -100 kN-m
My,top = 200 kN-m
My,bot = 0

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 1


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED


 Section compactness check (beam-column)
 Section compression capacity
 Section shear capacity along z & y axes
 Section bending capacity for y-y & z-z axes
 Member compression capacity for y-y & z-z axes
 Member bending capacity
 Interaction capacity, D/C, for y-y & z-z axes

RESULTS COMPARISON

Independent results are taken from hand calculations based on the CSI steel
design documentation contained in the file “[Link],” which is
available through the program “Help” menu.

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 2


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

Percent
Output Parameter SAP2000 Independent Difference

Compactness Class 2 Class 2 0.00%


Section Compression Resistance,
2,797.6 2,797.6 0.00%
Nc,Rd (kN)
Buckling Resistance in Compression,
2,797.6 2,797.6 0.00%
Nby,Rd (kN)
Buckling Resistance in Compression,
2,797.6 2,797.6 0.00%
Nbz,Rd (kN)
Section Plastic Bending Resistance,
499.1 499.1 0.00%
Mc,y,Rd (kN-m)
Section Plastic Bending Resistance,
84.8 84.8 0.00%
Mc,z,Rd (kN-m)
Section Bending Resistance Shear Reduced,
487.0 487.0 0.00%
MV,y,Rd (kN-m)
Section Bending Resistance Axially Reduced,
310.8 310.8 0.00%
MN,y,Rd (kN-m)
Section Bending Resistance Axially Reduced,
82.26 82.26 0.00%
MN,z,Rd (kN-m)
Member Bending Resistance,
499.095 499.095 0.00%
Mb,Rd (kN-m)
Section Shear Resistance,
756.6 756.6 0.00%
Vc,z,Rd (kN)
Section Shear Resistance,
984.7 984.7 0.00%
Vc,y,Rd (kN)
Interaction Capacity, D/C 2.044 2.044 0.00%

COMPUTER FILE: NTC 2018 EX002

CONCLUSION
The results show an exact comparison with the independent results.

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 3


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

HAND CALCULATION

Properties:
Material: S275 Steel
E = 210,000 MPa
G = 80,769 MPa
fy = 235 MPa
Section: 457x191x98 UB
A = 12,500 mm2
b = 192.8 mm, tf = 19.6 mm, h = 467.2 mm, tw = 11.4 mm, r = 10.2 mm
hw = h − 2t f = 467.2 − 2 • 19.6 = 428 mm

d = h − 2 ( t f + r ) = 467.2 − 2 • (19.6 + 10.2 ) = 407.6 mm

b − tw − 2r 192.8 − 11.4 − 2 • 10.2


=c = = 80.5 mm
2 2
Wpl,y = 2,230,000 mm3
Wpl,z = 379,000 mm3
ry = 191.3 mm
rz = 43.3331 mm
Iz = 23,469,998 mm4
I w 1.176 • 1012 mm 6
=
IT = 1,210,000 mm4
Member:
L = Lb = Lunbraced = 400 mm
Ky = 1.0, Kz = 1.0
Other:
1.05
γM 0 =

1.05
γM1 =

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 4


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

Loadings:
P = 1400 kN axial load
M z −1 = 100 kN-m
M z − 2 = −100 kN-m
M y −1 = 200 kN-m

M y − 2 = 0 kN-m

Results in the following internal forces:


N Ed = 1400 kN

M y , Ed = 200 kN-m

M z , Ed = 100 kN-m

Vz , Ed = 500 kN-m

Vy , Ed = 0 kN-m

Section Compactness:
235 235
=ε = = 1
fy 235

1  h 1 N Ed 
=
α − − ( t f + r ) , 0 ≤ α ≤1
c  2 2 tw f y 

1  467.2 1 ( −1, 400, 000 ) 


=
α  − • − (19.6 + 10.2
= )  1.141 > 1, so
407.6  2 2 11.4 • 235 
α =1.0

Localized Buckling for Flange:


For the tip in compression under combined bending & compression
9ε 9 • 1
λ cl .1 = = = 9
α 1

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 5


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

c 80.5
λe = = = 4.11
t f 19.6

λ e 4.11 < λ=
= cl .1 9
So Flange is Class 1 in combined bending and compression

Localized Buckling for Web:


α > 0.5, so
396ε 396 • 1
λ=
cl .1 = = 33.00 for combined bending & compression
13α − 1 13 • 1 − 1
d 407.6
λe = = = 35.75
tw 11.4
λ e 35.75 > =
= λ cl .1 33.00
456ε 456 • 1
λ=
cl .2 = = 38.00
13α − 1 13 • 1 − 1
λ e 35.75 < λ
= = cl .2 38.00
So Web is Class 2 in combined bending & compression.

Since Web is Class 2, Section is Class 2 in combined bending & compression.

Section Compression Capacity


Af y 12,500 • 235
N=
c , Rd N pl=
, Rd =
γM 0 1.05

N c , Rd = 2797.6 kN

Section Shear Capacity


Along z axis
η = 1.20 for fy ≤ 460 N/mm2, and (EC3-1-5 5.1(2), NTC § [Link].2.4)
η = 1.0 otherwise (EC3-1-5 5.1(2), NTC § [Link].2.4)

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 6


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

η = 1.0

Avz =A − 2bt f + t f ( tw + 2r ) ≥ η hwtw


= 12,500 − 2 • 192.8 • 19.6 + 19.6 (11.4 + 2 • 10.2 ) ≥ 1.2 • 428 • 11.4
= 5,565.5 mm 2 ≥ 5,855.04 mm 2
= 5,855.04 mm 2
fy 235
Vc , z , Rd
= = Avz • 5,855.04
γM 0 3 1.05 3

Vc , z , Rd = 756.567 kN

Along y axis
Avy =A − hwtw =12,500 − 428 • 11.4 =7, 620.8 mm 2

fy 235
Vc , y , Rd
= = Avy • 7, 620.8
γM 0 3 1.05 3

Vc , y , Rd = 984.7 kN

hw 428 72 235 72 235


== 37.5 < = 60
=
tw 11.4 η fy 1.2 235

So no shear buckling needs to be checked.

Section Bending Capacity


For y-y axis
W pl , y f y 2, 230, 000 • 235
M
= c , y , Rd M=
pl , y , Rd =
γM 0 1.05

M c , y , Rd = 499.1kN-m

For minor z-z axis

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 7


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

W pl , z f y 379, 000 • 235


M
= c , z , Rd M=
pl , z , Rd =
γM 0 1.05

M c , z , Rd = 84.8 kN-m

With Shear Reduction


For y-y axis
V=
Ed 500 kN > 0.5 • Vc ,=
Rd 378.3kN Shear Reduction is needed

Av = hwtw = 428.0 • 11.4 = 4,879.2 mm 2

2 2
 2VEd   2 • 500 
ρ
=  − 1=  − 1 = 0.1035
V   756.567 
 c , Rd 

 ρAv 2   0.1035 • 4879.22 


W −
 pl , y 4t  yk f 2, 230, 000 −  • 235
 w   4 • 11.4 
=M V , y , Rd = ≤ M c , y , Rd
γM 0 1.05

M V , y , Rd = 486.998 kN-m

For z-z axis


Vy , Ed = 0 kN < 0.5 • Vc , y , Rd No shear Reduction is needed

With Compression Reduction

N Ed 1400
=n = = 0.50
N pl , Rd 2797.6
A − 2bt f 12,500 − 2 • 192.8 • 19.6
=a = = 0.40 ≤ 0.5
A 12,500

For y-y axis

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 8


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

1− n 1 − 0.5
M N=
, y , Rd M pl , y , Rd = 499.1 •
1 − 0.5a 1 − 0.5 • 0.4
M N , y , Rd = 310.8 kN-m

For z-z axis


n<a
  n − a 2    0.5 − 0.4 2 
M N , z , Rd= M pl , z , Rd 1 −   = 84.8 • 1 −   
  1 − a     1 − 0.4  
M N , z , Rd = 82.26 kN-m

Member Compression Capacity:


Non-Dimensional Slenderness Ratio:
Steel is S235
h 467.2
= = 2.4 > 1.2
b f 192.8
and
=t f 19.6 mm < 40 mm

So we should use the Buckling Curve ‘a’ for the z-z axis and Buckling Curve ‘b’
for the y-y axis (NTC 2018, Table [Link]).

Y-Y Axis Parameters:


For buckling curve a, α =0.21 (NTC 2018, Table 4.2 VI)

K y = 1.00

Lcr , y 400
Lcr , y = 1 • 400 =
K y Ly = 400 mm, = 2.091
=
ry 191.3

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 9


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

π2 E π2 • 210, 000
=N cr , y = = 5,925, 691kN
 K y Ly  12,500 • ( 2.091)
2 2

A
 ry 
 
Af y 12,500 • 235
=
λy = = 0.022
N cr , y 5,925, 691

(
φ y 0.5 1 + α y λ y − 0.2 + λ= )  0.5 1 + 0.21( 0.022 − 0.2 ) + 0.0222 
2
= y
 
 
φ y =0.482

1 1
Stress Reduction
= Factor: χ y = = 1.0388
2 2
2
φy + φy − λ y 0.482 + 0.482 − 0.0222

χ y 1.0388 > 1.0, so=


= χ y 1.0

χ y Af y 1.0 • 12,500 • 235


N
= by , Rd =
γM1 1.05

Z-Z Axis Parameters:


For buckling curve b, α =0.34 (NTC 2018, Table 4.2 VI)

K z = 1.00
Lcr , z 400
Lcr , z = 1 • 400 =
K z Lz = 400 mm, = 9.231
=
rz 43.33

π2 E π2 • 210, 000
=N cr , z = = 304, 052 kN
 K z Lz  12,500 • ( 9.231)
2 2

A 
 rz 
Af y 12,500 • 235
=
λz = = 0.098
N cr , z 304, 052

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 10


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

( )
φ z 0.5 1 + α z λ z − 0.2 + λ=  0.5 1 + 0.34 ( 0.098 − 0.2 ) + 0.0982 
2
= z
  
 
φ z =0.488

1 1
Stress Reduction
= Factor: χ z = = 1.0362
2 2
2
φz + φz − λ z 0.488 + 0.488 − 0.0982

χ z 1.0362 > 1.0, so=


= χ z 1.0

χ z Af y 1.0 • 12,500 • 235


N
= bz , Rd =
γM1 1.05

N bz , Rd = 2, 797.6 kN

Member Bending Capacity:


h 467.2
= = 2.4 > 2
b f 192.8
So we should use the Buckling Curve ‘c’ for lateral-torsional buckling (NTC
2018, Table [Link]).
0.49
α LT =

0.4
λ LT ,0 =(default for rolled section)
β =0.75 (default for rolled section)

M B M=
= y −2 0, =
MA M
= y −1 200 kN-m
2 2
M M  0  0 
ψ 1.75 − 1.05 B + 0.3  B =
=  1.75 − 1.05 + 0.3  = 1.75
MA  MA  200  200 

Corrective Factor is determined from NTC 2018, Table 4.2 VIII


1 1
=kc = = 1.329
1.33 − 0.33ψ 1.33 − 0.33 • 1.75

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 11


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

π2 EI z  I w ( Lcr , z ) GIT 
2

M cr =
ψ + 
( Lcr , z )  z
2
 I π2 EI z 

π2 • 210, 000 • 23, 469,998  1.176 • 1012 4002 • 80, 769 • 1, 210, 000 
1.75 •
M cr =  + 2 
4002  23, 469,998 π • 210, 000 • 23, 469,998 

M cr = 119, 477, 445,900 N-mm

W pl , y f y 2, 230, 000 • 235


=
λ LT = = 0.066
M cr 119, 477, 445,900

( )
φ LT 0.5 1 + α LT λ LT − λ LT ,0 + βλ=  0.5 1 + 0.49 • ( 0.066 − 0.4 ) + 0.75 • 0.0662 
2
= LT
  

0.420
φ LT =

(
1 − 0.5 (1 − kc ) 1 − 2 λ LT − 0.8  = )
2
1 − 0.5 (1 − 1.329 ) 1 − 2 ( 0.066 − 0.8 )  =
2
f = 0.987
   

1 1  1 1
=χ LT ≤ 1.0 or 2 
f φ + φ 2 − βλ 2  λ LT
f 
LT LT LT

 1  1  1 1 
χ LT   ≤ 1.0 or 2 
 0.987  0.420 + 0.420 − 0.75 • 0.066
2 2
 0.066 0.987 

χ=
LT 1.2118 ≤ (1.0 or 230.9 )

so
1.0
χ LT =

fy 235
M b , Rd =
χ LT W pl , y 1.0 • 2, 230, 000 •
=
γM1 1.05

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 12


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

M b , Rd = 499.095 kN-m

Interaction Capacity: Compression & Bending


Section Bending & Compression Capacity
Formula NTC 4.2.38
2 5n 2 5•0.5
D  M y , Ed   M z , Ed   200   100 
=   +  =
 310.8  +  82.3  0.414 + 1.630
=
C  M N , y , Rd   M N , z , Rd 

D
= 2.044 (Governs)
C

Member Bending & Compression Capacity: Method B


k factors used are taken from the software, and determined from Method 2 in
Annex B of Eurocode 3.
k yy = 0.547

k yz = 0.479

k zy = 0.698

k zz = 0.798

Formula NTC C4.2.37


D N Ed M y , Ed M z , Ed
= + k yy + k yz
C χ y Af yk W f W pl , z f yk
χ LT pl , y yk
γM1 γM1 γM1

D 1, 400 200 100


= + 0.547 × + 0.479 ×
C 1×12,500 × 235 1×
2, 230, 000 × 235 379, 000 × 235
1.05 1.05 1.05
D
=0.5 + 0.22 + 0.56
C

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 13


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAP2000
REVISION NO.: 2

D
= 1.284
C

Formula NTC 4.2.38


D N Ed M y , Ed M z , Ed
= + k zy + k zz
C χ z Af yk W f W pl , z f yk
χ LT pl , y yk
γM1 γM1 γM1

D 1, 400 200 100


= + 0.698 × + 0.798 ×
C 1×12,500 × 235 1×
2, 230, 000 × 235 379, 000 × 235
1.05 1.05 1.05
D
=0.5 + 0.28 + 0.941
C
D
= 1.721
C

D
= 2.044 (Governs)
C

NTC 2018 Example 002 - 14

You might also like