Lignin-Derived Carbon Materials Review
Lignin-Derived Carbon Materials Review
Dedication ((optional))
Lignin is a highly abundant source of renew able carbon that can be consider ed as a valuable sustainable source of biobased
mater ials. By application specific pretreatments and manufacturing method, lignin can be converted to a variety of value adde d
carbon materials. How ever, the physical and chemical heterogenitites in lignin complicate its use as a feedstock. In this rev iew ,
lignin manufacturing process, effects of pretreatments and manufacturing methods on the properties of lignin, properties and
applications of various lignin der ived carbon mater ials such as carbon fibers, carbon mats, activated carbons, carbon films; a re
discussed.
1
[Link]
1. Introduction
2
The majority of lignin is an amorphous ther moplastic enzymes, w hich hydrolyze cellulose and produce lignin. The
poly mer and has a glass transition temperature ( Tg) in the produced lignin is then further purified.
melt- processeble temperature range at 50- 150 °C. Several The second method of lignin isolation uses chemical
other lignins possess Tg higher than 150 °C and a few reagents to isolate lignin from carbohydrates. Based on the
reported cases even indicates higher value of Tg than the reagents used, lignins generated in this process can be
degradation temperature depending on the lignin isolation broadly divided into tw o types, 1) sulfur containing lignins
and processing method.5, 29 For example, one study reports such as kraft lignin and, 2) non-sulfur containing lignins such
that the Tg of native hardw ood lignin is betw een 65 and 85 C as soda lignin and organosolv lignins. 28 It should be noted
while that of softw ood lignin is betw een 90 and 105 C. 18 In that sulfur-containing lignins are mor e commercially available
another example from our ow n previous study, solvent- worldw ide than the non-sulfur lignins. Some chemical pulping
extracted hardw ood lignin show ed Tg 108 C5 w hile Tg of processes are briefly described in the follow ing section.
softw ood Kraft lignin w as 153 C.29
3
[Link]
4. Effects of manufacturing processes on Table 1. Molecular w eight of lignin products obtained using
properties of lignin SEC.30
Lignin’s molecular w eight, physical and chemical properties Lignin type Mw Mw/Mn
largely depend on the source and the isolation methods of (g/mol)
the lignin. The combined impact of the pretreatment method Alcell Organosolv lignin 2390 2.9
Straw Organosolv lignin 8680 5.1
and the extraction procedure on the properties of lignin is
Soda lignin 8000 4.8
dominant over the effect of the lignin source. Different Aquasolv lignin 2600 3.1
researchers reported the effect of extraction procedure on Dioxane extracted Aquasolv solid lignin 7080 4.0
lignin’s molecular w eight. Wör meyer et al. studied an effect of
different pretreatment methods on the properties of rye straw Sun et al. studied the effect of extraction procedures on
lignin.30 They studied straw and Alcell organosolv lignin, soda the molecular w eight of w heat straw lignin. 31 In this study,
pulp lignin, and three Aquasolv lignins (obtained by a alkali lignins, ball- milled lignins, enzy me lignins and
organosolve lignins w ere prepared and molecular w eights of
combination of ther mal hydrolysis and enzy matic hydrolysis
these lignins w ere studied by SEC. The result show ed the
procedures) such as Aquasolv liquid (AL), Aquasolv solid alkali lignin, milled lignin, enzy me lignin and organosolv lignin
(AS) and dioxane extracted Aquasolv solid ( DAS) along w ith were composed of low er molecular w eight lignin fragments.
liquid hot w ater processed (LHW) (obtained by hydrother mal The MW of enzymatic lignin, ball- milled lignin, organosolv
process) lignins. They found the LHW and the DAS lignin lignin and alkali lignin w ere 2020, 1890, 1640 and 1400 g/mol,
contained the highest amount of acid insoluble lignin or solid respectively, w hich corresponded to the reducing contents of
associated polysaccharides in the isolated lignin fractions.
lignin follow ed in descending order by the soda, the
In another study, Toledano et al. explored the influence
organosolv, the AL and the AS lignins ( Figure 3). of extraction treatment on the olive tree pr uning lignin
Car bohydrate content w as high in both straw organosolv (7% structure.32 In this case, organosolv treatment, alkali
w/w) and AS (13.2%) lignins that makes the AS lignin less treatment and autohydrolysis treatment w ere performed to
suitable for various material applications. When molecular isolate lignin. Different processes produced lignin w ith varying
weights of all lignins using Size Exclus ion Chromatography concentration (g/L) such as organosolv lignin (55.5), auto-
(SEC) w ere compared, straw organosolv lignin w as found to hydrolysis lignin (0.59), alkali treated lignin (31.8) w ith purity
of 65.8%, 26.9% and 4.5% respectively. Autohydrolysis lignin
have the highest w eight-average molecular w eights ( Mw)
was found to have the low est Mw, w hile Organosolv lignin had
follow ed by the soda lignin, DAS and AL lignins (Table 1). the highest molecular w eight ( Table 2). Additionally,
The ther mal stability of these lignins by autohydrolysis lignin and organoosolv lignin w ere found to
ther mogravimetric analysis ( TGA) show ed comparable have higher contents of hydroxyl groups. Alkali treated lignin
degradation w ith increase of temperature ( Figure 4a), contained low er hydroxyl group content but high carboxyl
how ever, Tmds ( Temperature of maximum decomposition) of group indicating alkali treatment promoted oxidation reactions.
these lignins are varied. Interestingly, the AS lignin, DAS High carboxyl content can be related to more degradation in
lignin and LHW lignin’s solid residue based samples have lignin structure. Or ganos lv lignin w as found to have the
higher Tmds ( Figure 4b) than corresponding liquid fraction low est carboxyl group content.
based products. Also, solid residue based lignin samples In a recent w ork, Saito et al. prepared the high molecular
show ed different w eight loss trend than the liquid fraction weight lignin fraction via for maldehyde crosslinking, 5, 29 w hile
based samples. LHW lignin w as found to loose less w eight as-received lignin contained a significant amount of low
than other straw based lignin and degraded only at high molecular w eight fraction. The crosslinked high molecular
temperature. In a comparison study, Tmds of S lignin, DAS weight fraction of lignin show ed a much higher Tg than that of
lignin and LHW lignin w ere found to surpass the Tmd of as-received lignin.
novolac resin. These studies clearly show ed that the
pretreatment affects on the ther mal stability of the produced
lignin.
4
based solvent extracted lignin to a softw ood kraft lignin, the
yield of MeOH insoluble lignin increased to 50% 29 due to the
increased amount of high molecular w eight and MeOH
insoluble fraction in the softw ood Kraft lignin.
In the study of methanol fractionation of softw ood Kraft
lignin,29 the MeOH insoluble lignin show ed much higher Tg
(211 °C) than as-received lignin (153 °C) due to the removal
of a low molecular w eight (LMW) fraction, w hich appeared at
higher retention time in DMF SEC w ithout LiBr (Figure 5a),
while MeOH soluble lignin show ed an increased LMW
fraction and a low er Tg (117 °C) compared to the as-received
lignin (Table 3). The difference of Tg over the range of roughly
100 °C from the same batch of the sample is quite s ignificant
and no other conventional poly mers possess this kind of
characteristic. More importantly, the trend of these Tg values
agreed very w ell w ith the Fox equation using the LMW area
(a)
from RI peaks in SEC ( Figure 5a) converting to the w eight
fraction (Figure 5b), w hich indicates that the LMW lignin
oligomer fraction contributes to low ering its Tg, and the
estimated Tg of LMW fraction from the Fox equation w as -
89 °C. The Fox-equation-der ived Tg value of oligomeric lignin
was so low that it justified the plasticization effect by the LMW
lignin fraction. The capability to tailor the Tg of lignin is
extremely important for its processing in applications such as
carbon fiber precursors because it directly correlates to the
melt- processing temperature or the stabilization conditions
prior to carbonization.
The amount of LMW fraction also correlated w ell w ith
the char yield through a linear regression (Figure 5b), i.e. an
increase in the LMW fraction decreased its char y ield ( Table
3). High char yield of MeOH insoluble lignin is advantageous
for using lignin as a carbon precursor. Although the lignin
peak from SEC data from neat DMF most likely represents
both s ingle lignin molecules and lignin aggregates in DMF,
the data correlated very w ell w ith other physical properties
and the resulting significantly high PDI r ather represents
(b) heterogeneities existing in lignin sample. Single, monomodal
Figure 4. (a) TGA of Alcell organosolv lignin, straw peaks of these lignin samples obtained in the case of DMF
organosolv lignin, soda lignin and aquasolv liquid lignin.30 (b) SEC w ith LiBr (Table 3) indicates that the size of lignin
TGA of aquasolv solid lignin, dioxane extracted aquasolv corresponds to a single distribution, but combined results of
solid lignin and liquid hot w ater processed lignin. 30 DMF SEC both w ith and w ithout LiBr suggested that the
chemical structure and compositions among as -received,
Table 2. Functional group contents and Mw, Mn and MeOH insoluble, and MeOH soluble lignins are s ignificantly
polydispersity ( Mw/Mn) of alkali lignin (AL), hydrolysis altered. It should be noted that researchers tend to report low
lignin(HL) and organossolv lignin (OL). 32 lignin molecular w eight w ith single monomodal distribution,
similar to the data from RI detector in DMF SEC w ith LiBr in
Functional Alkali treated Hydrolysis Organosolv this study, how ever, absolute molecular w eight from light
Groups lignin lignin lignin scattering detector w as significantly higher and
Hydroxyl 2.62 ± 0.05 10.12± 0.18 9.81± 0.04 concentionally reported narrow er PDI does not reflect
Carbonyl 0.12±0.01 0.53± 0.01 0.24±0.01 property of lignin.
Carboxyl 6.57± 0.07 7.15±0.12 4.03± 0.08
Molecular Weight (g/mol)
Mw 10,900 3660 12,900
Mn 4930 2120 2250
Mw/Mn 2.21 1.73 5.74
5
[Link]
Resi Car bon fibers are high perfor mance mater ials w ith
dual salient properties of high stiffness, great tensile strengths,
Mn[b1]
Tg wt % Mn[a] PDI [ PDI [b Mw[b2] elevated temperature tolerance, low thermal expansion,
a] [g/mo 1]
[°C] at [g/mol]
l]
[g/mol] lightw eight, high flexibility, and high fatigue r esistance. 3, 10 -12,
1000 14-15, 22, 37-40
°C
These properties make carbon f ibers important
component in advanced compos ites for a variety of industries,
As-
receiv e including aerospace, civil engineering, automotive and w ind
d lignin 153 41 10,000 110 2,360 3.05 96,100 pow er applications. Many of these enhanced material
properties can be correlated to the or ientation of graphite
layers, w hich are mostly aligned parallel to the long axis of
MeOH the fiber. The properties of carbon fibers largely depend on
insolub 443,00
le
211 47
0
3.5 6,520 2.28 188,000 the precursor mater ials. Currently, carbon fibers are mainly
lignin manufactured from polyacrylonitrile ( PA N) precursor and to a
small extent from mesophase pitches, w hich make carbon
fibers expensive due to the high volatile price of the
MeOH petroleum based feedstoc k and corresponding pr ocessing
soluble 117 32 3,800 129 1,590 1.90 86,600 expenses.22, 39 Thus, there is a huge demand for a low cost
lignin
carbon fiber precursor material, w hich can be converted to
[a] decent quality carbon fiber.
DMF SEC w ithout LiBr, Determined from refractive index
detector
[b1]
DMF SEC w ith LiBr, Determined from refractive index
detector
[b2]
DMF SEC w ith LiBr, Determined from light scattering
detector
6
fibers had modest mechanical properties w ith moderate Table 6. Spinning temperature and Tg of pyrolytic, Alcell and
tensile strength. Uraki et al. w orked on the pr oduction of kraft lignins 44
carbon fibers from birchw ood derived organosolv lignin
obtained by aqueous acetic ac id pulping. 43 The fiber w as Lignin Spinning temperature Tg Mw
made by melt-spinning the clean and dr ied lignin. The (°C) (°C) (PDI)
produced carbon fibers w ith a 14 1 m diameter show ed Zone 1 Zone 2
tensile strength of about 0.035 GPa and modulus of about Kraft 170 202 131 1256
39.1 GPa. (2.2)
Kadla et al. reported pr eparation of carbon fibers from Alcell 130 158 77 790
various lignins.12, 14, 44 In their study, w hen Alcell lignin, (2.5)
hardw ood kraft lignin and softw ood kraft lignin w ere Pyrolytic 105 125 70 702
compared as lignin fiber precursor, it w as found that the (2.3)
softw ood kraft lignin could not be spun into lignin fiber,
charring occurred before melting. On the other hand, both Kubo reported the application of a variety of lignin –
Alcell and hardw ood kraft lignin w ere found to be melt- synthetic poly mer blends as precursor material for the
spinnable to make lignin fiber. Alcell lignin show ed low er production of carbon fiber. Fibers made from unmodified
spinning temperature than the hardw ood kraft lignin ( Table hardw ood kraft and organosolv lignin w ere found to be
4.). Kadla investigated the applicability of lignin– [Link] use of blends of lignin and synthetic poly mers such
polyethelene oxide ( PEO) blends as precursors for the as poly (ethylene terephth alate) ( PET), PEO and
production of carbon fibers. In this w ork, a blend of polypropy lene ( PP) w as found to reduce the brittleness and
commercially available unmodified kraft hardw ood lignin and show ed improved tenacity (Table 7).
polyethylene oxide ( PEO) w as used to make moderate
strength carbon fibers by ther mal spinning follow ed by Tabel 7. Mecahnical Properties of hardw ood kr aft lignin,
carbonization (Table 5). Use of PEO facilitated the fiber hardw ood kraft and PEO blend and Alcell lignin 14
spinninability but did not significantly alter the properties of
the fiber. In another w ork, this group made carbon fibers from Lignin Diameter Tensile- Modulus
bio-oil der ived pyrolytic lignin by ther mal spinning follow ed by (µm) strength (GPa)
carbonization. Pyrolytic lignin show ed melt spinnability at a (MPa)
low er temperature than other technical lignins ( Table 6). Hardw ood 46±8 605 41
Fibers generated in this process w ere found to have hollow Kraft
structures and these fibers w ere prone to fiber-fiber fusion
during ther mal stabilization probably due to low softening
Hardw ood 47±5 332 57
temperature.
kraft/ poly
propylene
Table 4. Spinning temperatures of lignin/polyethylene oxide
95/5
(PEO fiber) blends 14
Lignin/ PEO blend Hardw ood kraft Alcell lignin Hardw ood 31±5 669 84
lignin (°C) kraft/ poly
(°C) ethylene
100/ 0 195-228 138-165 terephthalate
95/ 5 189-198 153-172 95/5
87.5/ 12.5 191-200 138-172
75/ 25 150-182 120-157 In recent years, considerable research effort has
contributed to the production of carbon fiber from lignin at the
Oak Ridge Natio nal Laboratory ( ORNL). Baker et. al. at
ORNL investigated lignin and its blends as low -cost, high-
Tabel 5. Mecahnical Properties of carbon fibers from production volume feedstock for carbon fiber. They found
hardw ood kraft lignin, hardw ood kraft and PEO blend and difficulties in the melt spinning of as-received hardw ood kraft
Alcell lignin14 lignin, w here the melt spinning of organic-solvent-w ashed
hardw ood kraft lignin w as easily perfor med. 22 The carbon
Lignin Diameter Tensile- Modulus fibers obtained in this process show ed tensile strength of
(µm) strength (GPa) 0.517 GPa and also the yield of carbon fibers from starting
(MPa) lignin w as only moderate. Baker also w orked w ith Alcell lignin.
Hardw ood 46±8 422±80 40±11 They found that the increase of Tg and softening temperature
Kraft (Ts ) of Alcell lignin by use of a ther mal pretreatment could
enhance the tensile strength and yield of Alcell lignin der ived
carbon fiber. The tensile strength and obtained yield of
Hardw ood 46±3 396±47 38±5 ther mally pretreated lignin carbon fiber w ere 0.710 GPa and
kraft/ PEO 41%, r espectively, w hereas the original untreated lignin
(100K) 95/5 carbon fiber had tensile strength and yield of 0.338 GPa and
31%, respectively.
Hardw ood 63±7 339±53 33±53 At present, lignin carbon fibers w ith average tensile
kraft/ PEO strength as high as 1.07 GPa w ith moduli of 82.7 GPa can be
(600K) 95/5 prepared from modified lignin.22, 4 5 Synthesis of such higher
Alcell 31±3 388±123 40±14 performance lignin carbon fibers requires highly pure lignin
w ith tuned properties. Especially, contamination had a major
effect on the properties of carbon fibers. Based on their
research, the ORNL team described a general specification
of lignin for the production of carbon fiber (Table 8).
7
[Link]
Table 8. ORNL specification for lignin feedstock to be used susceptibility. Thus, in general, ther mo-stabilization is
as carbon fiber precursor.10, 37 performed in different stages w ith different heating rate. An
Specification Value example of such heating profile is first heating the lignin from
Lignin Content 99 (w eight %) room temperature to about 105 ºC at a rate of 1 ºC/min. 10
Ash Content < 0.1 (w eight %) The lignin fiber is then held at 105 ºC for 1 h to remove
Volatile Material Content <5% (at 250°C) (w eight %) moisture in the sample. Next, the lignin fiber is heated from
Particulate Matter Removal of all particulate 105 º C to 200 º C at a rate of 0.25 ºC/min. In the last step, the
matter > 1 µm in diameter lignin fiber sample is held at 200 º C for 24 h to further oxidize
and cross-link the lignin and raise Tg value. During ther mo-
Based on the precursor mater ials, tw o types of lignin stabilization, the oxygen content of the various lignins
carbon fibers are made, 1) carbon fibers from unmodified increases to a maximum and then decreased w ith increasing
lignin w here no additive is used, 2) carbon fibers from a blend temperature.12, 15 The slow er heating rate favors reactions
of lignin and additive, w hich are coextruded. In this review , that increase oxygen content at low temperatures and
the manufacturing process from unmodified lignin der ived decrease oxygen at higher temperature. At temperature
carbon fiber w ill be discussed as an example. The process to below 250C w ith a slow er heating rate, oxidation of lignin
produce carbon fiber from purified lignin can be divided into dominates. Due to the presence of oxygen in this stage,
three steps (Scheme 3); i) carbon fiber precursor spinning, ii) reactions such as autooxidation, variety of rearrangements
ther mal stabilization, and iii) carbonization. The process and radical coupling reactions occur in lignin, w hich
requires highly pure lignin to produce good quality carbon generates functional groups such as carbonyl groups on
fiber. Also, the lignin should have a narrow molecular w eight lignin. At this stage, breaking of aliphatic side chains,
distribution,22 w hich more likely mean requiring less methoxy groups, and -O-4 bonds occur. Thus, the relative
heterogeneous batch of lignin than actually narrow PDI as amount of aryl ether structures in lignin significantly
discussed in above section. This property facilitates an even decreases after thermo stabilization. At temperature above
increase in molecular w eight of the entire fiber dur ing the 250C, dehydration reaction, condensation, cross-linking and
ther mal stabilization that results in a more unifor mly elimination reactions dominate, w here w ater, CO and CO2
structured carbon fiber during carbonization. In some cases , are released from lignin through the for mation of keto, ester
lignin is w ashed and dried under vacuum prior to spinning and anhydride linkages.12
and ther mally pr etreated under vacuum for about 1h to It should be noted, the chemistries of ther mo
remove any volatile. stabilization of lignin and pitch based carbon fibers are quite
different.12, 15 In the lignin-based systems, slight w eight loss
occurrs during ther mal spinning and stabilization. These yield
losses are accompanied by an increase in molecular w eight,
which is the result of condensations and dehydrations in the
lignin macromolecule. In contrary, in case of pitch based fiber,
increase of w eight occurs during oxidative stabilization.
Dur ing the ther mo stabilization, alkyl components of pitch are
oxidized before dehydr ogenation and cyclization r eaction,
which increases the w eight. Lignin due to the presence of
oxidized side-chain, dur ing ther mo stabilization, undergoes
Schem e 3. Preparation of carbon fibers from lignin.
condensation reaction and releases w ater and consequently
6.1.1. Melt-spinning looses w eight.
The majority of lignin melts and flow s upon heating if Tg 6.1.3. Carbonization
is low enough.10 The spinning temperature is related to its Tg,
Ts , and molten viscosity of the lignin sample. For a material After the ther mo-stabilization pr ocess, the lignin fiber is
having low melting viscosity, a low spinning temperatur e is carbonized by heating the samples to 1000 ºC or higher. The
required. The ther mal spinning temperatur e of lignin should purpose of carbonization is to eliminate all elements except
be w ell below its decomposition or cross-linking carbon and graphitize the structure. Thus, in this step, the
temperature.10, 12, 22, 38 Thus, the spinning temperatures of majority of w eight loss occurs. With the increase of
different lignins vary w ith the lignin’s property. For example, carbonization temperature, the extent of oxygen-containing
the spinning temperatur e of Alcell lignin is 138-165 ºC functional groups such as carbonyl, carboxyl, methoxy
whereas; hardw ood kraft lignin required a temperature range groups decreases and a significant increase of aryl and
of 195-228 ºC.10 In both cases, these temperatures ar e low er condensed acyl carbons occurs. 10 These changes make the
than their corresponding ther mal decompos ition temperatures, carbon fiber more hydrophobic. To prevent lignin combustion
170 and 268 ºC, respectively. or any carbon fiber precursor combustion, this process
requires oxygen free atmosphere. Thus, carbonization
6.1.2. Therm o-stabilization process is generally carried out in Argon or Nitrogen
atmosphere w here a heating rate of 3-5 ºC/min is used in a
In the manufacturing of carbon fiber from lignin fiber, a batch mode and multiple processes at different temperature
ther mo-stabilization is used to make lignin fibers stable in a continuous mode. Similarly to the ther mo-stabilization,
tow ards high temperature, w hich prevents the fiber fusion the heating rate in carbonization has a major effect on the
during the carbonization step. 10, 12, 14-15 During ther mo- structure of the carbon fiber. In some cases, it w as found that
stabilization, lignin is cross-linnked to raise lignin softening slow heating rates resulted in highly br ittle and porous carbon
temperature. Reactions occurring during ther mo-stabilization fiber, w hile rapid heating rate pr oduced carbon fiber w ith less
step increase the Tg , changing the ther moplastic property of brittleness and more stable fiber structur e. Car bonization
lignin to ther mosetting. This transfor mation of ther moplasicity process changes the surface and porosity of carbon fibers to
to ther mosetting properties is necessary for lignin fibers to a large extent by releasing volatile components w hich in turn
maintain a fiber for m and prevents from softening and generates imperfections and defects on the surface of the
deformation during the carbonization step. fiber. SEM images of lignin based carbon fibers at different
The rate of heating of lignin fibers during ther mo- stages of preparation are show n in the Figure 6.11
stabilization has a profound effect on fiber stability and fusion
8
standing lignin-derived carbon fiber mat based electrodes
exhibited comparable electrochemical perfor mance to
commercial carbon-based anodes at a fraction of the
mater ials and processing costs. The tentative estimated costs
of lignin carbon fibers are $3/lb for monolithic, electrically
interconnected, self -supporting mats. This value is
significantly low er than the price of battery grade graphite
(a) (b) pow der ($12/lb for unprocessed battery grade graphite).
The compos itional and electrochemical character ization
show ed that carbonized lignin had a disordered nano-
crystalline microstructure. The carbonized mats cycle
reversibly in conventional aprotic organic electrolytes w ith
Coulombic efficiencies over 99.9%. Moreover, lignin carbon
fibers carbonized at 2000 °C can cycle reversibly in 1M LiPF 6
in propy lene carbonate, w hile irreversible lithium insertion
(c) (d) and extraction w as observed in more disordered LCFs ,
carbonized at 1000 °C w ith the s mallest nanoscal e graphitic
domains.
(e) (f)
9
[Link]
a
mater ial show ed resistivity comparable to the typical values Standard deviations in each case is specified inside
for graphite. parentheses 3
In a recent w ork, Wang et al. reported the use of lignin-
derived fused eletro-spun carbon fibrous mats as high
performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. 6 In this 6.3. Activated carbons
work, a nitr ogen- doped free-standing fused lignin fiber mat
was made from organosolv lignin-polyethylene oxide (90:10)
blend by electro-spinning follow ed by carbonization and
Activated carbons are highly porous materials w ith large
ther mal annealing in the presence of urea. The fused carbon
internal surface area. They can be effectively used as
fibers w ithout nitrogen doping exhibited high specific capacity
adsorbents in a w ide range of applications such as gas
up to 445 mAh/g at a current density of 30 mA/g and good
separation, catalyst support, filtration systems, and others. 23,
cyclic stability at different current rates. After thermal 25, 47
Due to lignin’s high carbon content and functionalized
annealing in the presence of urea, the charge capacity w as
phenolic structure, it can be considered as one of ideal
further improved to as high as 576 mAh/g and still maintained
precursors for activated carbons. Properties of activated
a good capacity of about 200 mAh/g even at a high current
carbons largely depend on quantity and nature of pores
rate of 2000 mA/g.
present in it. Pores can be divided into micropores ( pore
diameter below 2 nm), mesopores (por e diameter betw een 2-
50 nm), and macropores (pore diameter larger than 50 nm). 48
Porosity of activated carbon depends on the types of surface
functional groups present on the precursor and method of
activation. Lignin content of the feedstoc k controls the yield of
the char and corresponding activated carbon yield. The
microstructure of char and activated carbons also depends
on the lignin and cellulose contents of the biomass source.
According to the study of Gergova et al. , lignin-der ived char
had mor e total pore volume and higher BET surface area
compared to cellulose-based char.49 On the other hand, lignin
(a) chars had low reactivity than cellulosic chars and thus, it w as
easier to activate chars w ith high cellulos ic contents. It w as
also found that, activation of lignin produces mostly
micropores, w hile activation of cellulose produces a mixture
of pore size.
Traditionally, activated carbons can be div ided into tw o
types: pow dered activated carbon ( PA C) and granular
activated car bon ( GA C).47 Pow dered activated carbon ( PA C)
contains fine particles w ith less than 0.2 mm diameter and
thus, presents a large external surface area and relatively
small diffusional resistance. These properties of PA C result in
a very high adsorption capacity. On the other hand, granular
activated carbon ( GAC) has larger particle size of about 5
(b) mm in diameter, w ith s maller external surface area and
Figure 8. SEM images of a) carbon fiber made from phthalic adsorption capacity relative to PA C. How ever, GA C is more
anhydride modified lignin and b) microscale porosity of stable tow ards continuous contact processes.
phthalic anhydride modified lignin.3 Activated carbons are mainly prepared by physical and
chemical activations (Scheme 4).23, 25 In both cases, the
Table 9. BET surface areas and pore volumes of unmodified yields of the char depends on the lignin content of the starting
and modified lignins after oxidation and carbonization. a mater ial. In the physical activation, starting material is
carbonized and then the resulting char is activated using
Carbon BET Adsorbed carbon diox ide or steam. An application of a long activation
type Surface pore time produced carbons w ith relatively high microporosity and
area volume w ide micropore size distribution. In one case, w hen the
(m2 /g) (cm3/g) starting mater ial w as activated at 850 °C for 20 h in CO2, the
Phthalic 32.7230 0.0133 process produced activated carbons w ith surface area 1853
Anhydride (1.5566) (0.0009) m2/g w ith a micropore volume of 0.57 c m3/g. On the other
modified hand, the increase in the carbonization temperature only
generated moderate changes in the BET surface area and
Acetic 37.4293 0.0151 micropore volume of the carbon.
anhydride (1.2133) (0.0006) In the chemical activation, lignin is first activated by
modified impregnating different chemical reagents such as zinc
chloride (ZnCl2), phosphoric acid ( H3 PO 4) and then lignin is
Succinic 15.3236 0.0077
carbonized. During activation, the release of different
anhydride (1.8268) (0.0008)
substances from lignin generates pores on the surface and
modified
results in high surface area and poros ity in the produced
Maleic 6.3865 0.0018 carbon. In chemical activation, the ratio of lignin to
Anhydride (1.2363) (0.0007) impreganating r eagent and the activation temperature are
modified tw o most important parameters. Hayashi et al. studied the
effect of different parameters of the chemical activation on
Unmodified 8.1976 0.0042 the pr operties of the activated carbon. They reported that use
(0.7089) (0.003) of ZnCl2 as activating agents produced activated car bons w ith
surface area about 1000 m2/g. The surface area w as found
to be max imum w hen an impregnation ratio of lignin to ZnCl2
10
of 1:2.3, w as used. At a low temperature (generally <500 °C), The use of solvent extracted low er molecular w eight lignin
the surface area and microporos ity of the activated carbons fraction facilitated the controlling of the template synthesis of
increased w ith the increase in temperature. How ever, at a carbon. In this process, mesopor ous carbon w as synthesized
higher temperature ( >600°C), the surface area and by i) cross-linking lignin w ith for maldehyde using an acid or a
microporos ity of this mater ial decreased. At a high base catalyst in the presence of a surfactant ( Pluronic F127)
temperature, the carbon structure shrank and that in turn and ii) treating precross-linked lignin w ith ( Pluronic F127)
decreased the surface area and pore volume of the material. under acidic conditions. The portion of the surfactant reacted
Interestingly, w hen alkali metal compounds w ere used as w ith the hydroxyl groups of lignin and formed a miscible part
activating agents, activated carbons w ere found to have low while the other portion did not inter act and formed an miscible
surface area w hen the carbonization temperature w as below domain at the core of the resin. The product w as
500 °C. These compounds w ere found most effective above subsequently pyrolysed, w hich removed the surfactant and
800 °C in generating high surface area mostly due to the pore carbonized the mater ial simultaneously. When no activation
enlar gement. Authors noted that above 800 °C, the excess was used, mesoporous carbons made in this process w ere
enlar gement caused merging of pores, resulting in an found to have BET surface areas in the r ange of 205-418 m2
increase in mesopores and a decrease of micropore volume, /g.52 (Table 10) The synthesized carbons also exhibited
and of surface area. Fierro et al. show ed that w hen H3 PO 4 characteristic mesopores at a volume 2-6 times than that of
was used as the activating agent, low impregnation ratios micropores. Further, Saha et al. show ed the surface areas of
promoted the creation of micropores. 50 The acid/lignin ratios these mater ials could be further increased by incorporating
equal to or higher than 1.0 s lightly affected the pore size an activation step.53 Thus, w hen surfactant template lignin
distribution. Increasing impregnation times reduce d the BET derived mesoporous carbon w as physically and chemically
surface area and the total pore volume. Moreover, activated w ith CO2 and KOH, both surface area and total pore
impregnation times also affected the pore size distribution of volume of the mesoporous carbon increased.
the activated carbons.
11
[Link]
surface area of 1440 m2 /g. When KOH w as used, carbon electrical measur ements revealed the sensitivity of lignin
mater ials w ere found to have mainly microporosity w ith a tow ards aniline. AFM analysis show ed a decrease in the film
maximum surface area of 1407 m2/g. surface roughness after exposure to aniline.
7. Outlook
Table 10. Pore textural character istics of lignin der ived
carbons a
Lignin is the major constituent of biomass. The U.S.
Renew able Fuels Standard ( RFS) mandated to produce 16
Entry Pr eperation BET Mesopore Total
(Surfactant specific volume pore billion gallons of lignocellulosic biofuels (primarily EtOH) by
content surface (cm3/g) volume 2022.5 7 This decision inevitably generate enor mous amount
w t. %) area (cm3/g) of lignin as a co-product of biofuel manufacture. This
(m2/g) remarkable level of lignin production and availability is a
rather exciting opportunity to develop valuable use of lignin in
LMC- HCHO/acid 418 0.34 0.50 various applications. An application of lignin based carbon
1 (105) mater ials that fulfill consumer needs and maximize the
environmental sustainability is rapidly developing. All the
LMC- HCHO/acid 205 0.13 0.20 potential use of lignin-derived carbon materials described
2 (210)
here show a promising development and some of the novel
mater ials might be on a consumer market in near future.
LMC- 222 0.15 0.22
3 HCHO/base How ever, it should also be noted that further intensive
(160) research is needed to foster understanding the basic
chemistry and processing technology of lignin more efficiently
LMC- HCHO/base 214 0.17 0.19 to provide improved properties, value, service life and utility,
4 (160) which can offer better r enew able carbon based products. The
fostered know ledge for manufacturing lignin-based carbon
LMC- Precrossed 208 0.24 0.28 mater ials should also contribute to many other valued-added
5 lignin/THF applications of lignin. Good usage of lignin w ill help to
(116) achieve a clean and sustainable society.
12
5. T. Saito, R. H. Brow n, M. A. Hunt, D. L. Pickel, J. M. 29. T. Saito, J. H. Perkins, F. Vautard, H. M. Meyer, J.
Pickel, J. M. Messman, F. S. Baker, M. Keller and A. M. Messman, B. Tolnai and A. K. Naskar,
K. Naskar, Green Chemistry, 2012, 14, 3295-3303. ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 221-228.
6. S.-X. Wang, L. Yang, L. P. Stubbs, X. Li and C. He, 30. K. Wörmeyer, T. Ingram, B. Saake, G. Brunner and
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013, 5, I. Smirnova, Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102,
12275-12282. 4157-4164.
7. J. J. BOZELL and S. CHATTERJEE, Google 31. R. Sun, J. M. Law ther, W. B. Banks and B. Xiao,
Patents, 2013. Industrial Crops and Products, 1997, 6, 97-106.
8. G. Gellerstedt and G. Henriksson, Monomers, 32. A. Toledano, X. Erdocia, L. Serrano and J. Labidi,
Polymers and Composites Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy,
from Renewable Resources 2008. 2013, 32, 1187-1194.
9. J. Lora, in Monomers, Polymers and Composite 33. C. Sabornie and S. Tomonori, in Polymer
from Renewable Resources, eds. M. N. Belgacem Precursor-Derived Carbon, American Chemical
and A. Gandini, Elsevier, Oxford, UK; Amsterdam, Society, 2014, vol. 1173, ch. 7, pp. 153-168.
The Netherlands, 2008, ch. 10, pp. 225-241. 34. S. Chatterjee, E. B. Jones, A. Clingenpeel, A. M.
10. J. Luo, J. Genco, B. Cole and R. Fort, Mc Kenna, N. W. Mc Nutt, O. Rios, D. J. Keffer and A.
BioResources, 2011, 6, 4566-4605 Johs, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering,
2014, 2, 2002-2010.
11. D. A. Baker, N. C. Gallego and F. S. Baker, Journal 35. W. E. Tenhaeff, O. Rios, K. More and M. A.
of Applied Polymer Science, 2012, 124, 227-234. McGuire, Advanced Functional Materials, 2013, n/a-
12. J. L. Braun, K. M. Holtman and J. F. Kadla, Carbon, n/a.
2005, 43, 385-394. 36. O. R. N. Laboratory,
13. K. Sudo and K. Shimizu, Journal of Applied Polymer [Link] w [Link]/w atch?v=nLcZKGw S3zE.
Science, 1992, 44, 127-134. 37. F. S. Baker, W. L. Griffith and A. L. Compere, in
14. J. F. Kadla, S. Kubo, R. A. Venditti, R. D. Gilbert, A. Process Report, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
L. Compere and W. Griffith, Carbon, 2002, 40, 2005.
2913-2920. 38. J. F. Kadla, S. Kubo, R. D. Gilbert and R. A. Venditti,
15. T. Q. Hu, Chemical Modification, Properties and in Chemical, modification, properties, and usage of
Usage of Lignin, Kluw er Academic/ Plenum lignin, ed. T. Q. Hu, Kluw er Academmic/Plenum
Publishers, New York, 2002. Publishers, New York, 1 edn., 2002, ch. 7, pp. 121-
16. L. Serrano, A. Toledano, A. Garcia and J. Labidi, ed. 135.
R. J. Peterson, Nova Science Publishers Inc., New 39. X. Huang, Materials, 2009, 2, 2369-2403.
York, 2012, pp. 139-182. 40. M. Foston, G. A. Nunnery, X. Meng, Q. Sun, F. S.
17. P. Bhattacharya, P. H. Steele, E. B. M. Hassan, B. Baker and A. Ragauskas, Carbon, 2013, 52, 65-73.
Mitchell, L. Ingram and C. U. Pittman Jr, Fuel, 2009, 41. S. Ōtani, K. Yamada, T. Koitabashi and A.
88, 1251-1260. Yokoyama, Carbon, 1966, 4, 425-432.
18. P. Bhattacharya, E. B. Hassan, P. Steele, J. Cooper 42. K. Sudo, K. Shimizu, N. Nakashima and A.
and L. Ingram, BioResources, 2010, 5, 908-919. Yokoyama, Journal of Applied Polymer Science,
19. P. Bhattacharya, V. Penmetsa, P. Steele and B. 1993, 48, 1485-1491.
Mitchell, Journal of Forest Products and Industries 43. Y. Uraki, S. Kubo, N. Nigo, Y. Sano and T. Sasaya,
2013, 2, 47-57. Holzforschung, 1995, 49, 343-350.
20. V. K. Thakur, M. K. Thakur, P. Raghavan and M. R. 44. W. Qin and J. F. Kadla, Journal of Applied Polymer
Kessler, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, Science, 2012, 126, E204-E213.
2014, 2, 1072-1092. 45. C. D. Warren and A. K. Naskar, Presentation bat
21. A. Duval and M. Law oko, Reactive and Functional 2012 DOE hydrogen and fuel cells program and
Polymers. vehicle technologies program annual merit review
22. D. A. Baker and T. G. Rials, Journal of Applied and peer evaluation meeting, 2012.
Polymer Science, 2013, 130, 713-728. 46. I. Isaev, G. Salitra, A. Soffer, Y. S. Cohen, D.
23. Suhas, P. J. M. Carrott and M. M. L. Ribeiro Carrott, Aurbach and J. Fischer, J Power Sources, 2003,
Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98, 2301-2312. 119, 28-33.
24. P. H. Wesley and K. N. Amit, eds., Polymer 47. J. i. Hayashi, K. Muroyama, V. G. Gomes and A. P.
Precursor-Derived Carbon, American Chemical Watkinson, Carbon, 2002, 40, 630-632.
Society, 2014. 48. Y. Zhai, Y. Dou, D. Zhao, P. F. Fulvio, R. T. Mayes
25. G. S. Dhillon, F. Gassara, S. K. Brar and M. Verma, and S. Dai, Advanced Materials, 2011, 23, 4828-
in Lignin properties and applications in 4850.
biotechnology and bioenergy, ed. R. J. Paterson, 49. K. Gergova, N. Petrov and S. Eser, Carbon, 1994,
Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, 2012, ch. 32, 693-702.
1, pp. 1-34. 50. V. Fierro, V. Torne, D. Montane´ and J. Salvado´
26. C. Heitner, D. Dimmel and J. A. Schmidt, eds., presented in part at the Carbon Spain, 2003.
Lignin and Lignans, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 51. E. Gonzalez-Serrano, T. Cordero, J. Rodriguez-
Florida, 2010. Mirasol, L. Cotoruelo, J. J. Rodriguez and Water
27. S. E. Harton, S. V. Pingali, G. A. Nunnery, D. A. Res. , 2004, 38, 3043-3050.
Baker, S. H. Walker, D. C. Muddiman, T. Koga, T. 52. D. Saha, E. A. Payzant, A. S. Kumbhar and A. K.
G. Rials, V. S. Urban and P. Langan, ACS Macro Naskar, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2013,
Letters, 2012, 1, 568-573. 5, 5868-5874.
28. G. S. Dhillon, F. Gassara, S. K. Brar and M. Verma, 53. D. Saha, Y. Li, Z. Bi, J. Chen, J. K. Keum, D. K.
eds., Biotechmnological Application of Lignin: Hensley, H. A. Grappe, H. M. Meyer, S. Dai, M. P.
Sustainable Alternative to Non-Renewable Paranthaman and A. K. Naskar, Langmuir, 2014, 30,
Materials, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, 900-910.
2012. 54. S. Hu and Y.-L. Hsieh, Journal of Materials
Chemistry A, 2013, 1, 11279-11288.
13
[Link]
14
Entry for the Table of Contents (Please choose one layout)
Layout 1:
REVIEW
1. Introduction
2. Chemical composition and Sabornie Chatterjee, Tomonori Saito*
physical properties of lignin
3. Lignin extraction from Page No. 1 – Page No.13
various sources
3.1 Acid sulphite process Lignin-Derived Carbon Materials
3.2 Alkaline kraft process
3.3 Organosolv process
3.4 Soda pulping process
4. Effect of manufacturing
process on the properties of
lignin
5. Lignin production: from tree
to carbon material
precursors
6. Lignin derived carbon
materials
6.1 Structural carbon fibers ((Insert
6.1.1 Melt spinning
6.1.2 Thermo stabilization
6.1.3 Carbonization
6.2 Carbon fiber mats
6.3 Activated carbon
6.4 Lignin films
7. Outlook
15