See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: [Link]

net/publication/392165199

Drone-Assisted Mesh Networks: A Framework for Emergency Connectivity in

Remote and Low-Infrastructure Zones

Article in International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · May 2025
DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018

CITATIONS READS

0 39

1 author:

Priyangshu Sutradhar
Manipal Academy of Higher Education
1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Priyangshu Sutradhar on 29 May 2025.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal

ISSN: 2581-9429 Volume 5, Issue 9, May 2025 Impact Factor: 7.67

Drone-Assisted Mesh Networks: A Framework for

Emergency Connectivity in Remote and Low-
Infrastructure Zones
Priyangshu Sutradhar
Department Of Electronics and Computer Engineering
Manipal University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
ORCID - 0009-0007-4993-4874

Abstract: Secure communication in cases of emergencies is paramount for prompt disaster response
and public safety. Yet, network infrastructure in most rural and remote areas is either defective or
nonexistent, causing interference with effective communication. Mesh networking, in which devices
communicate directly without the need for centralized infrastructure, offers an effective solution to such
a predicament. This work examines the opportunities and challenges of deploying mesh networking
technology for emergency communication in low-connectivity environments, including rural and disaster
areas. Based on a review of the existing technologies, case studies of previous disasters, and an
examination of socio-technical considerations, the research emphasizes the possibilities for improving
resilience in communication systems through mesh networks. The paper also addresses adoption
barriers including technical constraints, power limits, awareness among users, and policy loopholes,
with suggestions for future research and practical implementations..

Keywords: Mesh Networking, Emergency Communication, Low-Connectivity Areas, Disaster

Resilience, Offline-First Mobile Applications, Rural Communication Systems

I. INTRODUCTION
During disasters and mass emergencies, communication networks tend to collapse first, particularly in remote and rural
areas. In these regions, there are usually not strong communication systems available, and the loss of cell towers and
internet connections during floods, earthquakes, or cyclones substantially impairs relief initiatives as well as
coordination among first responders [1]. In response to this issue, mesh networking technology is now a decentralized
and robust solution. It enables devices to talk directly with one another, creating a peer-to-peer network that can
function without centralized infrastructure or internet connectivity [2]. Mesh networks are self-healing and self-
configuring, making them especially well-suited to environments with poor infrastructure. When a node fails, the
network will automatically route data through other nodes available, keeping it connected. It has been demonstrated
successfully in affected areas of disasters and is increasingly becoming a viable solution for emergency communication
[3]. Offline-first mobile applications with mesh networking protocols, including Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Direct, are
turning out to be effective devices in situations where traditional networks are not available [4]. Despite the promise of
mesh networking, however, there remain significant challenges to installing these systems in low-connectivity contexts.
These range from technological issues such as range limitation, power drain, device compatibility, and data rates [5]. In
addition, the use of these systems is often impeded by socio-economic limitations, user ignorance, and the lack of
uniform implementation models [6]. Thus, though mesh networking offers a promising way forward to increasing
disaster resilience, it can only be effectively implemented by overcoming both technology and systemic obstacles. The
purpose of this paper is to examine the state of the art in mesh networking technologies for emergency communication,
to define challenges that exist, and to present opportunities for their deployment in low-infrastructure and rural areas.

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018 113

[Link]
 IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal

ISSN: 2581-9429 Volume 5, Issue 9, May 2025 Impact Factor: 7.67

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

Mesh networking has drawn significant interest in recent years with its self-healing, decentralized topology, which
makes it particularly suited for emergency communication systems where conventional infrastructure may not be
reliable or accessible. Mesh networks differ from those with centralized architecture because nodes can talk to each
other directly, generating dynamic topologies that will change as connectivity and node presence change [1]. One of the
most significant early uses was the Serval Project that made Android phones capable of creating mesh networks with
Wi-Fi during the Haiti earthquake of 2010. It supported emergency calls and messages without mobile masts or the
internet [2]. Likewise, after Hurricane Sandy, the Red Hook Initiative in Brooklyn deployed a community-owned mesh
network that provided basic communications to residents [3]. In an Indian context, researchers at IIT-BHU conceived a
drone-based mesh communication system for natural disasters in remote rural areas. The system used ad hoc
networking protocols to enable messages to be forwarded by drones and mobile phones even during total internet
disruptions [4]. Despite these encouraging applications, several technical and practical issues remain. Mesh networks
frequently experience low bandwidth, excessive power consumption, and interference, particularly in densely populated
or physically heterogeneous areas [5]. Additionally, device heterogeneity and lack of standardized deployment schemes
limit scalability and create barriers to adoption [6]. Security is another vital concern. Mesh networks, particularly those
used in ad hoc environments, are susceptible to attacks like message spoofing, route hijacking, and data interception
[7]. These issues require multidisciplinary solutions incorporating strong cryptographic techniques, fault-tolerant
routing algorithms, and adaptive network management strategies. On the opportunity front, advancements in low-power
communication protocols (e.g., Bluetooth Mesh, LoRa) and offline-first mobile app development frameworks are
enabling a new generation of lightweight, robust applications for rural and disaster zones [8]. The intersection of edge
computing and mesh networking is also being explored to enable real-time, local decision-making without dependency
on central servers or internet access [9]. In summary, mesh networking presents a promising yet underutilized
opportunity to transform emergency communication, particularly in low-connectivity or infrastructure-scarce
environments.

III. METHODOLOGY
This study takes a qualitative case study methodology to thoroughly explore the problems and prospects of mesh
networking technologies for emergency communication in low-connectivity environments. Case study is a research
methodology that is particularly suitable for exploratory studies where depth of context and comprehension of intricate
systems in live environments are essential [1]. This research combines secondary data sources, focusing on technical,
operational, and socio-technical aspects of mesh networking deployments applicable to emergency environments.
A. Research Design and Rationale: Due to the interdisciplinary and practical nature of emergency communication,
the case study approach allows for the unification of technical requirements with socio-economic and environmental
factors [2]. This method allows for capturing varied findings from varied implementations without having to collect
primary data, which could be expensive or impracticable in disaster sites [3]. Past research has used case studies
effectively in examining wireless mesh networks in disaster relief [4], vindicating the selection of this design.
B. Case Selection Criteria: We employed the purposive sampling strategy to choose cases with features necessary for
dealing with the research goals [5]. The standards were:
Emergency relevance: Cases in which mesh networks were implemented or prototyped specifically for crisis or disaster
communication.
Varied contexts: Coverage of rural and urban environments to demonstrate differing infrastructural issues.
Access to full secondary data: Ensuring analysis robustness and cross-case comparisons.
We chose the following cases:
The Serval Project (Haiti, 2010): A smartphone-based Wi-Fi mesh network deployed in the Haiti earthquake relief,
showing that decentralized communication is possible when cellular infrastructure is destroyed [6].
Red Hook Initiative Mesh Network (New York, 2012): Grassroots mesh networking to re-establish connectivity after
Hurricane Sandy, showcasing community mobilization and network self-governance [7].

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018 114

[Link]
 IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal

ISSN: 2581-9429 Volume 5, Issue 9, May 2025 Impact Factor: 7.67

Drone-Aided Mesh Network Prototype by IIT-BHU (India, 2024): UAV-aided mesh communication network aimed at
extending rural and hard-to-reach connectivity during emergencies [8]. This is a new type of solution for low-
connectivity settings in the Indian environment.
C. Data Collection Methods: The research is based on secondary data collection from:
 Peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings: For thoroughly reviewed technical and performance
information [9][10][11].
 Technical reports and white papers: By organizations and project groups, with advanced deployment
information and lessons learned [12].
 Media coverage and news articles: To analyze community effect, adoption difficulties, and public opinion
[13].
 Open-source documentation and repositories: To examine network designs, protocol implementations, and
system scalability [14].
 The review period is between literature from 2010 and 2025 to include both pathfinder projects and recent
developments.
D. Analytical Framework: Data analysis utilized a thematic content analysis across four dimensions, aligned with
methodologies in comparable IoT and mesh networking studies [15][16][17]:
 Technical Architecture: Network topologies, communication protocols (Wi-Fi mesh, Bluetooth Mesh, LoRa),
routing algorithms, and hardware configurations [18]. Awareness of design decisions facilitates the
identification of technical constraints and opportunities.
 Network Coverage and Resilience: Parameters like fault tolerance, dynamic routing, self-healing ability, and
signal reach were studied to quantify network strength in uncertain disaster situations [19].
 Scalability and Sustainability: Measurement of deployment simplicity, cost, energy use, and maintenance need
to judge feasibility for large-scale adoption [20][21].
 Socio-technical Impact: Analysis of user accessibility, cultural acceptability, community engagement, and
regulatory obstacles essential for effective rollout in rural and urban settings [22].
A comparative matrix was prepared to bring the findings together, emphasize shared concerns, and present best
practices that can be applied to emergency communication requirements in India and other low-connectivity areas.
E. Ethical Considerations: Since the research utilized publicly accessible secondary data without compromising
human subjects or sensitive data, there was no need for ethical clearance [23]. The research, nonetheless, upholds
intellectual property by properly citing sources and ensuring proper representation of findings.
F. Limitations: The dependence on secondary sources restricts management of data quality and depth, especially for
socio-cultural aspects involving ethnographic or participatory research techniques [24]. Additionally, inconsistencies in
documentation guidelines across cases can affect comparative analysis consistency [25]. The use of primary field
studies and stakeholder interviews in subsequent work is suggested to supplement these findings.

IV. CASE STUDY

In 2025, a new drone-based mesh networking system that could overcome the critical problem of communication
breakdown in disaster-hit and connectivity-lacking areas of India was designed by researchers at the Indian Institute of
Technology (IIT) BHU, Varanasi. The project sought to develop an infrastructure-independent, scalable solution that
can function properly without dependence on traditional mobile towers or satellite-based networks, both of which tend
to be shut down during natural disasters or in far-flung geographies. The suggested system, the Self-Sustaining
Transmission Mechanism (SSTM), employs autonomous drones with lightweight wireless transceivers that can create
an ad hoc mesh network to enable short-distance communication and far-distance message delivery [26].The SSTM
design relies on a store-and-forward model, much like delay-tolerant networks (DTNs), in which drones serve as flying
relay nodes that collect, hold, and forward data—like text messages or photos—between nodes until reaching its
destination recipient. When flying in situations where line-of-sight or direct connectivity is lost, drones modify their
flight streams using GPS-based navigation to actively preserve network integrity. In contrast to traditional fixed
Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018 115
[Link]
 IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal

ISSN: 2581-9429 Volume 5, Issue 9, May 2025 Impact Factor: 7.67

communication systems, this method provides continuous adjustment to terrain variance and obstruction, which is
particularly important in rural or disaster-recovery situations. The system incorporates a mobile app-based interface that
makes it possible for ground users to encode and decode messages, making it possible to use even with non-technical
populations [26]. For purposes of lowering deployment cost and optimizing energy efficiency, the drones were fitted
with low-power, miniaturized communication modules and rechargeable batteries. The project also incorporates edge-
level cryptographic security measures to maintain the confidentiality of data being sent, a critical necessity in
emergency situations where communication of sensitive information such as reports of injuries, GPS points, or damage
to infrastructure can impact rescue efforts. The IIT-BHU research group had the backing of funding agencies like TII-
UAE, the IDAPT-Hub Foundation, and India's Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), which indicates the
project's significance in national-level disaster preparedness as well as rural digital inclusion plans [26].This case study
illustrates how mesh networking, when combined with mobile UAVs, is able to overcome the infrastructural constraints
plaguing traditional emergency communication infrastructure. It is a viable direction for scalable, quick-deployment
technologies specific to low-resource and high-threat environments. For future research, the research group aims to
incorporate artificial intelligence for more efficient drone path planning and real-time monitoring of network health to
further amplify system resilience and reliability in critical operations [26].

V. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS

The study on mesh networking technology for emergency communications in low-connectivity regions brings out both
the technical possibility and socio-environmental importance of these systems. From the thorough literature survey and
the case study of IIT-BHU, several important findings come out on the efficiency, challenges, and scalability of mesh
networks, especially in rural and disaster-affected areas of India. Literature portrays that mesh networks have a huge
benefit in cases of failed or non-existent centralized infrastructure. It has been established from studies that
decentralized topologies can keep the lines of communication open by dynamically re-routing the data between existing
nodes, providing higher resistance to node failure and damage to infrastructure [1], [5], [27]. The combination of store-
and-forward functions and delay-tolerant networking, as it is done in the IIT-BHU drone-based system, proves that
mesh networking is not only feasible but also adjustable to Indian geographies and disaster scenarios [26], [28].One of
the primary findings inferred through the case study is the operational viability of a mobile, independent mesh network
independent of the internet.

Figure 1: Mesh Topology Diagram and Brief Explanation [34]

The IIT-BHU system utilizing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) created intermittent wireless connections between
isolated areas and was found to be able to send important information like text and images in real-time environments
[26]. This confirms the effectiveness of mesh-based communication systems in disaster situations, particularly when
integrated into mobile systems like drones. From a technical point of view, issues like signal propagation across terrain,
energy constraints in mobile devices, and real-time routing issues continue to be relevant. As mentioned in earlier
studies [6], [18], [29], latency and intermittent connectivity issues need to be tackled by means of intelligent path
planning and adaptive routing protocols. In addition, heterogeneity across devices and stacks of protocols usually
results in integration hurdles that may hinder wide-scale deployment unless standardized paradigms are designed [3],
[21], [30]. Security remains another dominant concern. Open and ad hoc nature of mesh networks exposes them to
various threats including packet sniffing, spoofing, and denial-of-service attacks. Literature advocates for built-in

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018 116

[Link]
 IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal

ISSN: 2581-9429 Volume 5, Issue 9, May 2025 Impact Factor: 7.67

encryption and secure authentication protocols as a necessity [4], [22], [31], and the IIT-BHU prototype partially
addresses this with onboard encryption but still lacks a comprehensive intrusion detection mechanism [26]. Socio-
technically, mesh technology adoption in rural India also holds important opportunities. Mesh networks, particularly
those integrated into low-cost platforms, can connect the communication divide between the urban and rural areas in the
event of emergencies. This is in tandem with India's Digital India initiative and goals of disaster resilience by the
National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) [32]. Further, local community engagement in maintaining and
running such systems could upscale participatory disaster response frameworks [33]. In conclusion, the investigation
demonstrates that although mesh networking holds a lot of promise in facilitating strong emergency communication, its
full potential can be harnessed only through specific technological innovation, stakeholder training, and policy-level
adoption. The IIT-BHU case study is a real-world confirmation of the theory and demonstrates a workable path for
further research from academia and the government in this area.

VI. CONCLUSION
This research paper discussed the vital contribution of mesh networking technologies in upgrading emergency
communication systems, especially in rural and low-connectivity regions where traditional infrastructure is unreliable
or nonexistent. From a critical analysis anchored in literature and the thorough case study of the mesh network built
using UAVs at IIT-BHU, it can be seen that mesh networks are a very robust and adaptable option that can maintain
communications in disaster situations and off-grid areas [5], [6], [26], [27]. The successful deployment of the IIT-BHU
system is an example of how unmanned aerial vehicles can be used to create ad hoc mesh networks with coverage over
difficult terrain and breaking the limitations of ground-based communication infrastructure [27].However, several
intrinsic challenges remain limiting the scope of mesh networking for emergency communication. Major technical
challenges involve routing protocol optimization to deal with the dynamic topology fluctuations introduced by mobile
nodes like drones, increasing energy efficiency to extend network duration, and maintaining secure and authenticated
communication to avoid unauthorized access and possible attacks [20], [21], [22]. Device, communication standard,
and environmental heterogeneities in addition also make it challenging to implement standardized security frameworks
and interoperability protocols [3], [4]. Solving these challenges is crucial to enhance the robustness, scalability, and
security of mesh networks for real-time emergency [Link] from technical issues, social and operational
considerations are key to mesh network deployment success. User training, local engagement, and the establishment of
proper policy and regulatory frameworks are needed to ensure adoption and sustainable operation [1], [24]. Emergency
communications solutions have to be user-focused, with accessibility and usability for technologically less literate
[Link] the future, research should focus on the creation of adaptive routing protocols that can intelligently adapt
to network topology and node availability changes with reduced latency and packet loss [2]. Furthermore, lightweight
cryptographic protocol designs and anomaly detection tools specific to the resource-limited mesh nodes are necessary
to protect network integrity [21], [22]. Extensive field testing under various disaster and environmental conditions will
yield valuable performance limitation and area for improvement insights [5].In addition, the integration of mesh
networking with new technologies like 5G, Internet of Things (IoT), and edge computing offers promising prospects to
greatly improve emergency communication systems [3], [4]. Integration with IoT appliances can provide real-time
monitoring of disaster areas, whereas 5G with high data throughput and low latency can accommodate more advanced
communication services for emergency [Link], promoting multi-sectoral partnerships between academia,
industry players, and government bodies will be essential to turn research breakthroughs into scalable, practical
solutions. Policymakers must prioritize architectures that promote innovation while maintaining security, privacy, and
fair access to emergency communications technology [23]. By so doing, mesh networking can become a cornerstone
technology that significantly enhances disaster resilience and saves lives.

REFERENCES
[1] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2014.
[2] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand
Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2013.
Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018 117
[Link]
 IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal

ISSN: 2581-9429 Volume 5, Issue 9, May 2025 Impact Factor: 7.67

[3] S. Burleigh, T. Fall, V. Cerf, B. T. Kelly, and D. Scott, “A survey of mobile mesh networks for disaster
communication,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 103, p. 102138, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2020.102138.
[4] P. Gardner-Stephen, “The Serval Project: Practical Wireless Ad-hoc Mobile Telecommunications,” Flinders
University, Adelaide, Australia, Tech. Rep., 2011. [Online]. Available: [Link]
[5] M. Palinkas, S. Horwitz, C. Green, J. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood, “Purposeful sampling for qualitative
data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research,” Adm. Policy Ment. Health, vol. 42, no. 5, pp.
533–544, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
[6] “Serval Project aids Haiti earthquake communications,” ABC News, Jan. 2011. [Online]. Available:
[Link]
[7] “Red Hook Wi-Fi,” Wikipedia. [Online]. Available: [Link]
[8] A. Sinha, “IIT-BHU’s drone-based system offers communication sans Net,” The Times of India, Feb. 2024.
[Online]. Available: [Link]
[9] A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A survey on
enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376,
Fourthquarter 2015, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.
[10] M. Conti, A. Dehghantanha, K. Franke, and S. Watson, “Internet of Things security and forensics: Challenges and
opportunities,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 78, pp. 544–546, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2017.07.060.
[11] E. Z. Tragos, V. Angelakis, A. Fragkiadakis, R. Neisse, and G. Baldini, “Enabling reliable and secure IoT-based
smart city applications,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 49, pp. 43–60, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2016.03.006.
[12] P. Gardner-Stephen, “Design and evaluation of the Serval Mesh: A delay-tolerant network for humanitarian aid,”
in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps), Anaheim, CA, USA, Dec. 2012, pp. 1240–1246, doi:
10.1109/GLOCOMW.2012.6477730.
[13] “IIT-BHU develops drone-based emergency mesh system for rural areas,” NDTV Gadgets, Feb. 2024. [Online].
Available: [Link]
[14] Serval Project GitHub Repository. [Online]. Available: [Link]
[15] A. Sharma and M. M. Rathore, “Disaster-resilient communication networks: A systematic review,” J. Netw.
Comput. Appl., vol. 160, p. 102633, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2020.102633.
[16] M. Lakshmanan, “Challenges in implementing mesh networks in rural India,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 57,
p. 102205, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2021.102205.
[17] B. Edge, M. Polastre, and M. Welsh, “Decentralized Edge-Enabled Mesh Networks for Emergency Response,”
IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2560–2573, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3098482.
[18] S. Burleigh, T. Fall, V. Cerf, B. T. Kelly, and D. Scott, “A survey of mobile mesh networks for disaster
communication,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 103, p. 102138, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2020.102138.
[19] M. Lakshmanan, “Challenges in implementing mesh networks in rural India,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 57,
p. 102205, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2021.102205.
[20] A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A survey on
enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376,
Fourthquarter 2015, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.
[21] M. Conti, A. Dehghantanha, K. Franke, and S. Watson, “Internet of Things security and forensics: Challenges and
opportunities,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 78, pp. 544–546, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2017.07.060.
[22] E. Z. Tragos, V. Angelakis, A. Fragkiadakis, R. Neisse, and G. Baldini, “Enabling reliable and secure IoT-based
smart city applications,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 49, pp. 43–60, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2016.03.006.
[23] J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand
Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2013.
[24] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2014.
[25] M. Palinkas, S. Horwitz, C. Green, J. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood, “Purposeful sampling for qualitative
data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research,” Adm. Policy Ment. Health, vol. 42, no. 5, pp.
533–544, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018 118
[Link]
 IJARSCT
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
International Open-Access, Double-Blind, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed, Multidisciplinary Online Journal

ISSN: 2581-9429 Volume 5, Issue 9, May 2025 Impact Factor: 7.67

[26] TNN, “IIT-BHU’s drone-based system offers communication sans net,” The Times of India, Feb. 2025. [Online].
Available: [Link]
net/articleshow/[Link]
[27] S. M. F. Hasan, M. J. A. Aziz, and M. R. Amin, “Mesh Network Protocols and Applications for Emergency
Communications: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 166235–166247, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024516.
[28] M. A. Bhuiyan, “Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Based Delay-Tolerant Mesh Networks for Disaster
Management,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 64–70, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2019.1800243.
[29] Y. Alshamrani et al., “Routing in Wireless Mesh Networks: Challenges and Solutions,” IEEE Wireless Commun.,
vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 92–99, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1109/MWC.2019.1800191.
[30] R. Roman, J. Zhou, and J. Lopez, “On the Features and Challenges of Security and Privacy in Distributed Internet
of Things,” Comput. Netw., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2266–2279, July 2013, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2012.12.018.
[31] Y. Zhang, W. Lou, and Y. T. Hou, “Improving Security and Performance of Wireless Mesh Networks,” IEEE
Netw., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 18–24, July–Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1109/MNET.2011.5957073.
[32] Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India, “Digital India Programme,” 2015.
[Online]. Available: [Link]
[33] N. Alam and M. Q. Mahmud, “Community Participation in Disaster Management: An Empirical Study of Rural
India,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 49, 101634, 2020, doi: 10.1016/[Link].2020.101634.
[34] Zenarmor, “What is Mesh Topology,” Zenarmor Docs. [Online]. Available:
[Link]

Copyright to IJARSCT DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-27018 119

[Link]

View publication stats