ruby-core

Well the reason is that arg is supposed to be a message, right? A message can be an arbitrary object. So if I pass e as a message, why it doesn't become a value of the message property?

[#22699] Re: [Bug #1248] e.exception(e) returns self — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/03/06

Hi,

[#22703] Re: [Bug #1248] e.exception(e) returns self — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2009/03/06

What should be the result of calling x.exception(Exception arg) and x.exception(Class arg) then? Currently both create a new exception of type x.class with message arg (unless arg == x).

[#22784] Unicode sensitive operations — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2009/03/09

What's the status of Unicode/culture-sensitive operations in Ruby 1.9.1?

[#22880] Re: Unicode sensitive operations — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/03/13

Hi,

[#24378] [Bug #1248](Rejected) e.exception(e) returns self — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1248 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#22697] [Bug #1250] String#to_r and String#to_c with float number — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #1250: String#to_r and String#to_c with float number

2 messages 2009/03/06

[#23040] [Bug #1250] String#to_r and String#to_c with float number — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/03/28

Issue #1250 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#22701] Re: [Bug #1248] e.exception(e) returns self — "Kurt Stephens" <kurt@...>

... Or to preserve orignal stack trace?

1 message 2009/03/06

[#22706] file_load_ok(path) returns true for dirs — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

with gemprelude adding a lot of directories to the load path, we're

4 messages 2009/03/07

[#22711] Re: file_load_ok(path) returns true for dirs — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/07

Hi,

[#22724] Re: file_load_ok(path) returns true for dirs — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/03/07

[#22734] Re: file_load_ok(path) returns true for dirs — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/08

Hi,

[#22715] [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Alexander Pettelkau <redmine@...>

Bug #1251: gsub problem

9 messages 2009/03/07

[#22882] [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Stephen Bannasch <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1251 has been updated by Stephen Bannasch.

[#22717] Re: [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/07

Alexander Pettelkau schrieb:

[#22716] Re: [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/03/07

HI,

[#22719] Re: [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto schrieb:

[#22878] Re: [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/03/13

Hi,

[#22883] Re: [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/03/13

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Fri Mar 13 12:47:48 +0200 2009:

[#22881] Re: [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto schrieb:

[#22722] [Bug #1251] gsub problem — Alexander Pettelkau <redmine@...> 2009/03/07

Issue #1251 has been updated by Alexander Pettelkau.

[#22723] [Bug #1252] [PATCH] Net::Telnet FailEOF — Brian Candler <redmine@...>

Bug #1252: [PATCH] Net::Telnet FailEOF

2 messages 2009/03/07

[#26010] [Bug #1252](Closed) [PATCH] Net::Telnet FailEOF — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/10/08

Issue #1252 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#22725] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1253: Fix MSVC Build Issues

13 messages 2009/03/07

[#22738] Re: [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/08

Hi,

[#22758] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/08

Issue #1253 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22768] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/09

Issue #1253 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22771] Re: [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2009/03/09

Hello,

[#22773] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/09

Issue #1253 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22767] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/03/09

Issue #1253 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#22769] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/09

Issue #1253 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22794] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1253 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22795] [Bug #1253](Closed) Fix MSVC Build Issues — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1253 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22797] [Bug #1253](Open) Fix MSVC Build Issues — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1253 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#22805] [Bug #1253] Fix MSVC Build Issues — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1253 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22810] [Bug #1253](Closed) Fix MSVC Build Issues — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1253 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22726] [Bug #1254] MSVC 2008 Compiler warnings — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1254: MSVC 2008 Compiler warnings

4 messages 2009/03/07

[#22854] [Bug #1254](Closed) MSVC 2008 Compiler warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/12

Issue #1254 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22862] [Bug #1254] MSVC 2008 Compiler warnings — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/12

Issue #1254 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22863] Unsubscribe — Abdullah Jibaly <amjibaly@...> 2009/03/12

[#22727] Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

Hi everyone,

14 messages 2009/03/08

[#22730] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2009/03/08

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Charlie Savage <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22754] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2009/03/08

> This works until you start linking third-party upstream source that

[#22757] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2009/03/08

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Charlie Savage <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22759] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2009/03/08

Hi Austin,

[#22761] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2009/03/08

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Charlie Savage <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22811] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/03/10

> Well, my hope was to *not* have to rebuild things like pdcurses傭ut

[#22815] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2009/03/10

Hi Roger,

[#22820] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/03/10

>> 2) It allows mingw built binaries to interop with VC ones--binaries

[#22762] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2009/03/08

[#22735] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/08

Hi,

[#22756] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2009/03/08

[#22728] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/03/08

Charlie Savage wrote:

[#22729] Re: Moving ruby 1.9.1 forward on windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/03/08

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22731] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — James Lee <redmine@...>

Bug #1255: += for large strings egrigiously slow

11 messages 2009/03/08

[#22747] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — James Gray <redmine@...> 2009/03/08

Issue #1255 has been updated by James Gray.

[#22749] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/03/08

Issue #1255 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22745] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — James Lee <redmine@...> 2009/03/08

Issue #1255 has been updated by James Lee.

[#22752] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — James Lee <redmine@...> 2009/03/08

Issue #1255 has been updated by James Lee.

[#22764] Re: [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/03/08

Excerpts from Marius M奪rnes Mathiesen's message of Sun Mar 08 20:40:02 +0200 2009:

[#22763] Re: [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/03/08

[#22765] Re: [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@...> 2009/03/08

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:40 PM, James Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22732] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/03/08

Issue #1255 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22775] [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — James Lee <redmine@...> 2009/03/09

Issue #1255 has been updated by James Lee.

[#22782] Re: [Bug #1255] += for large strings egrigiously slow — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/03/09

Hi,

[#22736] Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <ed.odanow@...>

Moin, moin!

13 messages 2009/03/08

[#22739] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/08

Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner schrieb:

[#22740] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/08

Hi,

[#22741] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/03/08

[#22742] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2009/03/08

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 16:57, James Coglan <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22743] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/03/08

2009/3/8 Nikolai Weibull <[email protected]>

[#22744] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — daz <[email protected]> 2009/03/08

James Coglan wrote:

[#22746] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/08

daz schrieb:

[#22753] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/03/08

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:

[#22755] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/08

Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:

[#22760] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zznmeb@...> 2009/03/08

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner

[#22774] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/03/09

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#22737] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 and tail recursion optimization — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/08

Moin,

[#22748] [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <redmine@...>

Feature #1256: Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented

7 messages 2009/03/08

[#22750] [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/03/08

Issue #1256 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22751] Re: [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/08

Shyouhei Urabe schrieb:

[#22766] Re: [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/09

Hi,

[#22785] Re: [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/09

Nobuyoshi Nakada schrieb:

[#22790] Re: [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/10

Hi,

[#22788] [Feature #1256] Add constant TAILRECURSION to let a program recognize if tail recursion optimization is implemented — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <redmine@...> 2009/03/09

Issue #1256 has been updated by Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner.

[#22772] Continuation#thread method — Brent Roman <brent@...>

1 message 2009/03/09

[#22783] Tool to extract non-RIPPER content from parse.y — daz <[email protected]>

1 message 2009/03/09

[#22786] [Feature #1257] Add Continuation#thread method — Brent Roman <redmine@...>

Feature #1257: Add Continuation#thread method

2 messages 2009/03/09

[#28373] [Feature #1257](Rejected) Add Continuation#thread method — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/02/28

Issue #1257 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#22789] 1152: profiler.rb is not thread-safe — James Abley <james.abley@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/03/09

[#22792] [Bug #1258] Fix callback-7 compiler warnings — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1258: Fix callback-7 compiler warnings

2 messages 2009/03/10

[#22808] [Bug #1258](Closed) Fix callback-7 compiler warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1258 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22793] [Bug #1259] Fix array.c compiler warnings — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1259: Fix array.c compiler warnings

2 messages 2009/03/10

[#22809] [Bug #1259](Closed) Fix array.c compiler warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1259 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22799] ANN: openssl-nonblock 0.2.0 — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

Announcing openssl-nonblock 0.2.0, now available at:

3 messages 2009/03/10

[#22800] Re: ANN: openssl-nonblock 0.2.0 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/10

In article <[email protected]>,

[#22801] Re: ANN: openssl-nonblock 0.2.0 — Tony Arcieri <tony@...> 2009/03/10

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Tanaka Akira <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22803] Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello and sorry for my being slow for this issue. It's OK now for me to pass

21 messages 2009/03/10

[#22847] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@...> 2009/03/11

Hi~

[#22848] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — daz <[email protected]> 2009/03/11

Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:

[#22857] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/12

Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote:

[#22816] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/03/10

[#22833] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/11

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#22845] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/11

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#22907] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/16

Hi,

[#22917] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/03/16

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#22910] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/16

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#23021] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/26

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#23023] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/03/26

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23031] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/27

Luis Lavena wrote:

[#23073] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/03/31

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23080] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/31

Luis Lavena wrote:

[#22919] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/03/17

[#22817] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/03/10

> Can you test latest 1.8.6 repository? want to do one last release of 1.8.6

[#22832] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/11

Roger Pack wrote:

[#22842] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/03/11

Looks like it was just fixed. Thank you nobu

[#22831] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/11

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#22840] Re: Relegate 1.8.6 to Engine Yard, part II — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/03/11

Hi,

[#22804] [Bug #1260] Fix win32.c compiler warnings — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1260: Fix win32.c compiler warnings

2 messages 2009/03/10

[#22821] [Bug #1260](Closed) Fix win32.c compiler warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1260 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22812] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Daniel Golle <redmine@...>

Bug #1261: cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR

8 messages 2009/03/10

[#22818] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Daniel Golle <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1261 has been updated by Daniel Golle.

[#22819] Re: [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/03/10

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Golle <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22813] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1261 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#22814] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Daniel Golle <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1261 has been updated by Daniel Golle.

[#22824] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Daniel Golle <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1261 has been updated by Daniel Golle.

[#22861] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Daniel Golle <redmine@...> 2009/03/12

Issue #1261 has been updated by Daniel Golle.

[#23065] [Bug #1261] cross-compiling Ruby extensions using mkmf doesn't fully respect DESTDIR — Daniel Golle <redmine@...> 2009/03/30

Issue #1261 has been updated by Daniel Golle.

[#22822] [Bug #1262] Heap Corruption in DL::Handle — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1262: Heap Corruption in DL::Handle

3 messages 2009/03/10

[#22836] [Bug #1262](Closed) Heap Corruption in DL::Handle — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/11

Issue #1262 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22823] [Bug #1262] Heap Corruption in DL::Handle — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/10

Issue #1262 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22826] [Bug #1263] SHGetFolderPath uses wrong calling convention in tempdir — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1263: SHGetFolderPath uses wrong calling convention in tempdir

2 messages 2009/03/10

[#22838] [Bug #1263](Closed) SHGetFolderPath uses wrong calling convention in tempdir — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/03/11

Issue #1263 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#22827] [Bug #1264] dl/test_win32 incorrect module name — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1264: dl/test_win32 incorrect module name

2 messages 2009/03/10

[#22913] [Bug #1264](Closed) dl/test_win32 incorrect module name — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/16

Issue #1264 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22828] [Bug #1265] test_import calls printf in different c runtime libraries — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1265: test_import calls printf in different c runtime libraries

4 messages 2009/03/10

[#22839] [Bug #1265](Closed) test_import calls printf in different c runtime libraries — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/03/11

Issue #1265 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#22851] [Bug #1265] test_import calls printf in different c runtime libraries — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/12

Issue #1265 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22920] [Bug #1265](Closed) test_import calls printf in different c runtime libraries — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/17

Issue #1265 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22829] [Bug #1266] relative_path broken on windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1266: relative_path broken on windows

4 messages 2009/03/10

[#23042] [Bug #1266] relative_path broken on windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/28

Issue #1266 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#23047] [Bug #1266](Closed) relative_path broken on windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/29

Issue #1266 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23048] [Bug #1266] relative_path broken on windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/29

Issue #1266 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22843] [Backport #1268] Test fix not backported from trunk to ruby_1_8 — Richard Brown <redmine@...>

Backport #1268: Test fix not backported from trunk to ruby_1_8

3 messages 2009/03/11

[#23134] [Backport #1268](Closed) Test fix not backported from trunk to ruby_1_8 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/04/06

Issue #1268 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22853] [Backport #1268](Closed) Test fix not backported from trunk to ruby_1_8 — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2009/03/12

Issue #1268 has been updated by Anonymous.

[#22846] [Bug #1271] Segfault problem — Daniel Durante <redmine@...>

Bug #1271: Segfault problem

4 messages 2009/03/11

[#22879] Re: [Bug #1271] Segfault problem — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/03/13

Hi,

[#22903] [Bug #1271] Segfault problem — Daniel Durante <redmine@...> 2009/03/15

Issue #1271 has been updated by Daniel Durante.

[#22914] Re: [Bug #1271] Segfault problem — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/03/16

what steps to run to get the segfault?

[#22849] [Bug #1272] Fix Compiler Warnings - gc, numeric, random, strftime, variable, vsnfprintf — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1272: Fix Compiler Warnings - gc, numeric, random, strftime, variable, vsnfprintf

1 message 2009/03/12

[#22850] [Bug #1273] Fix Compiler Warnings - pack.c — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1273: Fix Compiler Warnings - pack.c

1 message 2009/03/12

[#22852] [Bug #1274] Heap Corruption in float#to_s — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1274: Heap Corruption in float#to_s

2 messages 2009/03/12

[#22865] [Bug #1274](Closed) Heap Corruption in float#to_s — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/12

Issue #1274 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22855] [Bug #1275] IPAddr unnecessarily destroys information on creation — Christopher Smith <redmine@...>

Bug #1275: IPAddr unnecessarily destroys information on creation

2 messages 2009/03/12

[#24379] [Feature #1275] IPAddr unnecessarily destroys information on creation — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1275 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#22858] [Bug #1276] Incorrect freeing of memory in OpenSSL extension — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1276: Incorrect freeing of memory in OpenSSL extension

3 messages 2009/03/12

[#22866] [Bug #1276](Closed) Incorrect freeing of memory in OpenSSL extension — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1276 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#28370] [Backport #1276] Incorrect freeing of memory in OpenSSL extension — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/02/28

Issue #1276 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22859] [Bug #1277] Incorrect passing of file handle between runtime libraries in OpenSSL extension — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1277: Incorrect passing of file handle between runtime libraries in OpenSSL extension

6 messages 2009/03/12

[#22884] [Bug #1277] Incorrect passing of file handle between runtime libraries in OpenSSL extension — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1277 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22868] [Bug #1277] Incorrect passing of file handle between runtime libraries in OpenSSL extension — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1277 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22876] Re: [Bug #1277] Incorrect passing of file handle between runtime libraries in OpenSSL extension — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/13

Hi,

[#22885] [Bug #1277] Incorrect passing of file handle between runtime libraries in OpenSSL extension — Dave B <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1277 has been updated by Dave B.

[#22886] [Bug #1277] Incorrect passing of file handle between runtime libraries in OpenSSL extension — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1277 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22860] [Bug #1278] Fix compiler warnings in openssl extension — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1278: Fix compiler warnings in openssl extension

2 messages 2009/03/12

[#22867] [Bug #1278](Closed) Fix compiler warnings in openssl extension — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1278 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22864] [Feature #1279] Add DTrace Probes — Conrad Taylor <redmine@...>

Feature #1279: Add DTrace Probes

1 message 2009/03/12

[#22869] [Bug #1280] Fix Compiler Warnings - digest/iconv/json/socket/syck/zlib extensions — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1280: Fix Compiler Warnings - digest/iconv/json/socket/syck/zlib extensions

3 messages 2009/03/13

[#22875] [Bug #1280] Fix Compiler Warnings - digest/iconv/json/socket/syck/zlib extensions — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1280 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#26114] [Bug #1280](Closed) Fix Compiler Warnings - digest/iconv/json/socket/syck/zlib extensions — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2009/10/16

Issue #1280 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#22870] [Bug #1281] sdbm extension missing #include ruby.h — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1281: sdbm extension missing #include ruby.h

2 messages 2009/03/13

[#23024] [Bug #1281](Closed) sdbm extension missing #include ruby.h — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2009/03/26

Issue #1281 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#22871] [Bug #1282] tk extension uses old style c function declarations generating a bunch of warnings — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1282: tk extension uses old style c function declarations generating a bunch of warnings

2 messages 2009/03/13

[#24729] [Bug #1282](Closed) tk extension uses old style c function declarations generating a bunch of warnings — Hidetoshi Nagai <redmine@...> 2009/08/03

Issue #1282 has been updated by Hidetoshi Nagai.

[#22872] [Bug #1283] rb_f_throw return type — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1283: rb_f_throw return type

2 messages 2009/03/13

[#22877] [Bug #1283](Closed) rb_f_throw return type — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/13

Issue #1283 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22873] [Bug #1285] Fix Compiler Warnings - iseq and insns — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1285: Fix Compiler Warnings - iseq and insns

2 messages 2009/03/13

[#28933] [Bug #1285](Feedback) Fix Compiler Warnings - iseq and insns — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/24

Issue #1285 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#22874] [Bug #1284] Net::HTTP POST performance — Brian Candler <redmine@...>

Bug #1284: Net::HTTP POST performance

4 messages 2009/03/13

[#27249] [Bug #1284](Closed) Net::HTTP POST performance — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/12/20

Issue #1284 has been updated by Hiroshi NAKAMURA.

[#29222] [Backport #1284] Net::HTTP POST performance — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/02

Issue #1284 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#30639] [Backport #1284][Closed] Net::HTTP POST performance — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2010/06/07

Issue #1284 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#22887] [Bug #1287] $? not set after Open3::popen3 — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #1287: $? not set after Open3::popen3

2 messages 2009/03/14

[#22888] [Bug #1287](Rejected) $? not set after Open3::popen3 — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/03/14

Issue #1287 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#22891] Revert change 22893? — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

Nobu,

1 message 2009/03/14

[#22892] Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...>

Got tired of current ruby Time limitation, I have written this -

24 messages 2009/03/14

[#22949] Re: Ruby Time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/19

In article <9e19ed87-9d12-4f98-af3c-bd49a71b0bd4@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,

[#22974] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/20

[#23055] Re: Ruby Time — "Martin J. Dst" <duerst@...> 2009/03/29

I agree with Pavel. Japan also may be adapting daylight savings

[#23058] Re: Ruby Time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/29

In article <[email protected]>,

[#22977] Re: Ruby Time — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/20

valodzka wrote:

[#22981] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/21

> I bet you'll get tired of updating that database. There's a major difference

[#22987] Re: Ruby Time — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/22

valodzka wrote:

[#22991] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/22

> No, that's not all. You then have to beg every single website on this planet

[#23002] Re: Ruby Time — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/23

valodzka wrote:

[#23005] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/23

> I think you'd better try that anyway. Tips: don't forget Windows.

[#23018] Re: Ruby Time — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/03/25

valodzka wrote:

[#22985] Re: Ruby Time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/21

In article <b5d0a489-4613-4b63-9664-8627358b2dd9@g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,

[#22992] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/22

> I found a discussion in PHP.

[#23025] Re: Ruby Time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/26

In article <[email protected]>,

[#23035] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/27

> It solves the maintainance problem. Good.

[#23036] Re: Ruby Time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/27

In article <[email protected]>,

[#23044] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/28

> > Olson tz database uses 64 bit representation independently from time_t

[#23057] Re: Ruby Time — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/29

In article <eb859ef1-94e9-472f-ab23-19d9f00154a7@j39g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,

[#22982] Re: Ruby Time — daz <[email protected]> 2009/03/21

valodzka wrote:

[#23056] Re: Ruby Time — daz <[email protected]> 2009/03/29

daz wrote:

[#22934] Re: Ruby Time — mathew <meta@...> 2009/03/18

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 18:33, valodzka <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22973] Re: Ruby Time — valodzka <valodzka@...> 2009/03/20

[#22897] Re: Ruby Time — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/15

Hi,

[#22893] [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — David Martin <redmine@...>

Feature #1291: O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open

10 messages 2009/03/15

[#29062] [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/03/27

Issue #1291 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

[#29065] Re: [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2010/03/27

2010/3/27 Motohiro KOSAKI <[email protected]>:

[#22896] Re: [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/15

Hi,

[#22899] Re: [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/03/15

In article <[email protected]>,

[#29038] [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/03/26

Issue #1291 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

[#29039] [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...> 2010/03/26

Issue #1291 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.

[#29040] Re: [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — stygian23 <stygian23@...> 2010/03/26

How do I unsubscribe to this, as its currently flooding my work e-mail and I don't have the time to follow my intellectual curiosity.

[#29043] Re: [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2010/03/26

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 16:02, stygian23 <[email protected]> wrote:

[#29059] Re: [Feature #1291] O_CLOEXEC flag missing for Kernel::open — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2010/03/27

Hi,

[#22894] [Bug #1292] 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #1292: 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3

7 messages 2009/03/15

[#22895] Re: [Bug #1292] 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/15

Hi,

[#22898] Re: [Bug #1292] 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/03/15

> Seems extconf.rb failed to detect socklen_t. ould you show

[#22901] Re: [Bug #1292] 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/15

Hi,

[#22915] Re: [Bug #1292] 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3 — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/03/16

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22922] Re: [Bug #1292] 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/17

Hi,

[#23493] [Bug #1292] 1.8 compile time error with mingw gcc 4.3 — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/18

Issue #1292 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#22900] [Bug #1293] revision.h not correctly updated in common.mk — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1293: revision.h not correctly updated in common.mk

2 messages 2009/03/15

[#22906] [Bug #1293](Closed) revision.h not correctly updated in common.mk — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/16

Issue #1293 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22909] Which YAML::Syck types/methods are required by the spec? — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>

I assume that most of the types under YAML::Syck are supposed to be implementation details, right?

1 message 2009/03/16

[#22911] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Diego Suárez García <redmine@...>

Bug #1295: SEGFAULT in RHEL 4

8 messages 2009/03/16

[#23093] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Diego Suárez García <redmine@...> 2009/04/01

Issue #1295 has been updated by Diego Su叩rez Garc鱈a.

[#22912] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/03/16

Issue #1295 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22918] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Diego Suárez García <redmine@...> 2009/03/16

Issue #1295 has been updated by Diego Su叩rez Garc鱈a.

[#22940] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1295 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22950] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Diego Suárez García <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1295 has been updated by Diego Su叩rez Garc鱈a.

[#23476] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Muhammad Ali <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1295 has been updated by Muhammad Ali.

[#23482] [Bug #1295] SEGFAULT in RHEL 4 — Diego Suárez García <redmine@...> 2009/05/16

Issue #1295 has been updated by Diego Su叩rez Garc鱈a.

[#22916] [Bug #1296] [trunk/22981] 64-bit issues on trunk in ext/zlib — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Bug #1296: [trunk/22981] 64-bit issues on trunk in ext/zlib

5 messages 2009/03/16

[#30498] [Bug #1296][Feedback] [trunk/22981] 64-bit issues on trunk in ext/zlib — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/29

Issue #1296 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30499] Re: [Bug #1296][Feedback] [trunk/22981] 64-bit issues on trunk in ext/zlib — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/29

Hi,

[#30500] [Bug #1296] [trunk/22981] 64-bit issues on trunk in ext/zlib — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/05/29

Issue #1296 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30501] Re: [Bug #1296] [trunk/22981] 64-bit issues on trunk in ext/zlib — Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...> 2010/05/29

On 29 May 2010 23:30, Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22921] [Bug #1298] wrong value for Hash of Hash — Heesob Park <redmine@...>

Bug #1298: wrong value for Hash of Hash

3 messages 2009/03/17

[#24381] [Bug #1298] wrong value for Hash of Hash — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1298 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#24382] [Bug #1298](Closed) wrong value for Hash of Hash — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1298 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22924] [Bug #1299] Build failure on i586 — Jeroen van Meeuwen <redmine@...>

Bug #1299: Build failure on i586

4 messages 2009/03/17

[#23397] [Bug #1299] Build failure on i586 — Alexey Froloff <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1299 has been updated by Alexey Froloff.

[#23398] [Bug #1299] Build failure on i586 — Alexey Froloff <redmine@...> 2009/05/08

Issue #1299 has been updated by Alexey Froloff.

[#23401] [Bug #1299](Closed) Build failure on i586 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/09

Issue #1299 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22927] [Bug #1301] Poor RegExp Matching Performance — Andreas Grau <redmine@...>

Bug #1301: Poor RegExp Matching Performance

7 messages 2009/03/18

[#22953] [Bug #1301] Poor RegExp Matching Performance — Andreas Grau <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1301 has been updated by Andreas Grau.

[#22955] Re: [Bug #1301] Poor RegExp Matching Performance — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2009/03/19

Andreas Grau schrieb:

[#22936] Re: [Bug #1301] Poor RegExp Matching Performance — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2009/03/19

At 23:53 09/03/18, Andreas Grau wrote:

[#22929] [Bug #1301] Poor RegExp Matching Performance — Andreas Grau <redmine@...> 2009/03/18

Issue #1301 has been updated by Andreas Grau.

[#22930] Re: [Bug #1301] Poor RegExp Matching Performance — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/03/18

Excerpts from Marius M奪rnes Mathiesen's message of Wed Mar 18 17:43:04 +0200 2009:

[#22928] Re: [Bug #1301] Poor RegExp Matching Performance — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/03/18

Excerpts from Marius M奪rnes Mathiesen's message of Wed Mar 18 16:53:08 +0200 2009:

[#22933] [Bug #1302] Strange behavior of callcc — Christophe Calves <redmine@...>

Bug #1302: Strange behavior of callcc

5 messages 2009/03/18

[#22975] [Bug #1302] Strange behavior of callcc — Christophe Calves <redmine@...> 2009/03/20

Issue #1302 has been updated by Christophe Calves.

[#22957] [Bug #1302] Strange behavior of callcc — Christophe Calves <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1302 has been updated by Christophe Calves.

[#22958] [Bug #1302] Strange behavior of callcc — Christophe Calves <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1302 has been updated by Christophe Calves.

[#22962] Re: [Bug #1302] Strange behavior of callcc — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/20

Hi,

[#22935] 1.8.6 rdoc breaks when rdoc'ing 1.9 — James Britt <james.britt@...>

I'm running ruby 1.8.6 (2009-03-10 patchlevel 362) [i686-linux] and

5 messages 2009/03/18

[#22961] Re: 1.8.6 rdoc breaks when rdoc'ing 1.9 — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2009/03/19

On Mar 18, 2009, at 15:31, James Britt wrote:

[#22963] Re: 1.8.6 rdoc breaks when rdoc'ing 1.9 — James Britt <james.britt@...> 2009/03/20

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#22967] Re: 1.8.6 rdoc breaks when rdoc'ing 1.9 — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2009/03/20

On Mar 19, 2009, at 19:00, James Britt wrote:

[#22976] Re: 1.8.6 rdoc breaks when rdoc'ing 1.9 — James Britt <james.britt@...> 2009/03/20

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#22937] Ruby not to be a part of Google's 2009 Summer of Code? — Rocky Bernstein <rocky.bernstein@...>

The list of participating organizations for Google's 2009 Summer of Code has

5 messages 2009/03/19

[#23013] Re: Ruby not to be a part of Google's 2009 Summer of Code? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/03/24

Hi --

[#23015] Re: Ruby not to be a part of Google's 2009 Summer of Code? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2009/03/24

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 10:04 AM, David A. Black <[email protected]> wrote:

[#22938] Re: Ruby not to be a part of Google's 2009 Summer of Code? — Ben Bleything <ben@...> 2009/03/19

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Rocky Bernstein

[#22959] Re: Ruby not to be a part of Google's 2009 Summer of Code? — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2009/03/19

Am Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:14:56 +0900

[#22939] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Tomas Matousek <redmine@...>

Bug #1303: A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it

8 messages 2009/03/19

[#22945] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1303 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22946] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1303 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#22947] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1303 has been updated by Heesob Park.

[#22948] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Tomas Matousek <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1303 has been updated by Tomas Matousek.

[#22943] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1303 has been updated by Heesob Park.

[#22942] [Bug #1303] A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #1303 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#28995] [Feature #1303](Rejected) A name considered a local variable on RHS of an assignment that defines it — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/25

Issue #1303 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#22960] [Bug #1304] Kernel#system bug — Borislav Stanimirov <redmine@...>

Bug #1304: Kernel#system bug

6 messages 2009/03/19

[#22970] [Bug #1304] Kernel#system bug — Borislav Stanimirov <redmine@...> 2009/03/20

Issue #1304 has been updated by Borislav Stanimirov.

[#22972] [Bug #1304] Kernel#system bug — Heesob Park <redmine@...> 2009/03/20

Issue #1304 has been updated by Heesob Park.

[#22965] Re: [Bug #1304] Kernel#system bug — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/20

Hi,

[#22966] [Bug #1304] Kernel#system bug — Dave B <redmine@...> 2009/03/20

Issue #1304 has been updated by Dave B.

[#22980] [Bug #1304](Closed) Kernel#system bug — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/03/20

Issue #1304 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#22978] Ruby 1.9 bloc parameters — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/03/20

[#22979] Ruby 1.9 bloc parameters — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...>

Hi,

1 message 2009/03/20

[#22986] [Bug #1306] exception when exiting from IRB if test/unit is loaded — Dmitry Vazhov <redmine@...>

Bug #1306: exception when exiting from IRB if test/unit is loaded

4 messages 2009/03/21

[#22993] [Bug #1306] exception when exiting from IRB if test/unit is loaded — Dmitry Vazhov <redmine@...> 2009/03/22

Issue #1306 has been updated by Dmitry Vazhov.

[#23436] [Bug #1306](Closed) exception when exiting from IRB if test/unit is loaded — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/05/12

Issue #1306 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#24136] [Backport #1306](Closed) exception when exiting from IRB if test/unit is loaded — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/07/04

Issue #1306 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#22988] [Bug #1307] rb_w32_spawn broken - builds fail — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1307: rb_w32_spawn broken - builds fail

5 messages 2009/03/22

[#23001] [Bug #1307] rb_w32_spawn broken - builds fail — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/23

Issue #1307 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22994] Re: [Bug #1307] rb_w32_spawn broken - builds fail — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/22

Hi,

[#22996] [Bug #1307] rb_w32_spawn broken - builds fail — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/22

Issue #1307 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22999] Re: [Bug #1307] rb_w32_spawn broken - builds fail — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/23

Hi,

[#22989] [Bug #1308] bigdecimal debug code prevents tests from running — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1308: bigdecimal debug code prevents tests from running

4 messages 2009/03/22

[#29506] [Bug #1308] bigdecimal debug code prevents tests from running — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #1308 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29701] [Bug #1308] bigdecimal debug code prevents tests from running — Kenta Murata <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #1308 has been updated by Kenta Murata.

[#26974] [Bug #1308](Open) bigdecimal debug code prevents tests from running — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/12/01

Issue #1308 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#22990] [Bug #1309] dl tests — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1309: dl tests

5 messages 2009/03/22

[#22997] [Bug #1309] dl tests — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/22

Issue #1309 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22998] Re: [Bug #1309] dl tests — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/23

Hi,

[#23000] [Bug #1309] dl tests — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/23

Issue #1309 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#22995] Re: [Bug #1309] dl tests — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/22

Hi,

[#23006] [Bug #1311] YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — Noah Easterly <redmine@...>

Bug #1311: YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse

8 messages 2009/03/23

[#29391] [Bug #1311] YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/04/09

Issue #1311 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#23007] [Bug #1311] YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — Noah Easterly <redmine@...> 2009/03/23

Issue #1311 has been updated by Noah Easterly.

[#23019] [Bug #1311] YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — Dave B <redmine@...> 2009/03/25

Issue #1311 has been updated by Dave B.

[#25851] [Bug #1311] YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2009/09/29

Issue #1311 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#26719] [Bug #1311] YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — Dave B <redmine@...> 2009/11/12

Issue #1311 has been updated by Dave B.

[#28777] [Bug #1311] YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — Simone Carletti <redmine@...> 2010/03/19

Issue #1311 has been updated by Simone Carletti.

[#29942] [Bug #1311](Closed) YAML::dump creates strings YAML::load cannot parse — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/02

Issue #1311 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23008] Installing 1.9.1 — Ron Green <rongreen1@...>

1 message 2009/03/24

[#23009] [Bug #1312] String#rindex(Regexp, offset) doesn't seem to match greedily — David Ellis <redmine@...>

Bug #1312: String#rindex(Regexp, offset) doesn't seem to match greedily

2 messages 2009/03/24

[#23010] Re: [Bug #1312] String#rindex(Regexp, offset) doesn't seem to match greedily — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/24

Hi,

[#23011] [Bug #1313] gem install not working on windows server 2008 — David Winstanley <redmine@...>

Bug #1313: gem install not working on windows server 2008

2 messages 2009/03/24

[#23012] [Bug #1313] gem install not working on windows server 2008 — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2009/03/24

Issue #1313 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

[#23016] [Bug #1314] CGI doesn爿奏 properly handle empty arguments — Samu Voutilainen <redmine@...>

Bug #1314: CGI doesn૑t properly handle empty arguments

1 message 2009/03/24

[#23017] MBARI patches for 1.8 HEAD — Brent Roman <brent@...>

1 message 2009/03/25

[#23022] [Feature #1316] Phasor.rb: Complex number class using polar coordinates — Peter Hillerström <redmine@...>

Feature #1316: Phasor.rb: Complex number class using polar coordinates

1 message 2009/03/26

[#23026] [Bug #1317] Creating a range with strings — Ian Bailey <redmine@...>

Bug #1317: Creating a range with strings

5 messages 2009/03/26

[#23027] [Bug #1317] Creating a range with strings — Michael Selig <redmine@...> 2009/03/26

Issue #1317 has been updated by Michael Selig.

[#23030] Re: [Bug #1317] Creating a range with strings — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/03/27

2009/3/27 Michael Selig <[email protected]>:

[#23028] Re: [Bug #1317] Creating a range with strings — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2009/03/26

[#23029] Re: [Bug #1317] Creating a range with strings — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/03/27

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:56:01 +1100, Jim Deville <[email protected]>

[#23032] 1.8.6 release on 3/31 — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hello all.

2 messages 2009/03/27

[#23033] Re: 1.8.6 release on 3/31 — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...> 2009/03/27

2009/3/27 Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]>:

[#23037] [Bug #1318] Ri documentation missing for BasicObject methods instance_eval, method_missing, send — Ambrus Zsbán <redmine@...>

Bug #1318: Ri documentation missing for BasicObject methods instance_eval, method_missing, __send__

3 messages 2009/03/27

[#29761] [Bug #1318] Ri documentation missing for BasicObject methods instance_eval, method_missing, __send__ — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #1318 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29805] [Bug #1318](Closed) Ri documentation missing for BasicObject methods instance_eval, method_missing, __send__ — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2010/04/27

Issue #1318 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#23038] [Bug #1319] Fix compiler warnings in file.c — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1319: Fix compiler warnings in file.c

2 messages 2009/03/28

[#29762] [Bug #1319](Closed) Fix compiler warnings in file.c — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/23

Issue #1319 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#23039] [Bug #1320] sdbm.c compiler warnings — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1320: sdbm.c compiler warnings

4 messages 2009/03/28

[#30141] [Bug #1320](Closed) sdbm.c compiler warnings — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #1320 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#30142] [Bug #1320](Open) sdbm.c compiler warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #1320 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#30143] [Bug #1320](Closed) sdbm.c compiler warnings — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/05/11

Issue #1320 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23045] [Bug #1321] syck does not escape a plain scalar that starts with ` — Richard Brown <redmine@...>

Bug #1321: syck does not escape a plain scalar that starts with `

1 message 2009/03/28

[#23046] Back to ruby19.dll — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

Hi everyone,

1 message 2009/03/28

[#23049] Extending binding and set_trace_func in 1.9 — Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>

It's been quiet in ruby-core.

1 message 2009/03/29

[#23050] [Bug #1322] define_method scope bug — "coderrr ." <redmine@...>

Bug #1322: define_method scope bug

5 messages 2009/03/29

[#23216] [Bug #1322] define_method scope bug — "coderrr ." <redmine@...> 2009/04/15

Issue #1322 has been updated by coderrr ..

[#23217] [Bug #1322] define_method scope bug — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/04/15

Issue #1322 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#23279] Re: [Bug #1322] define_method scope bug — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/22

Hi,

[#23281] [Bug #1322](Closed) define_method scope bug — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/04/22

Issue #1322 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#23051] [Bug #1323] Sockets broken on windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1323: Sockets broken on windows

6 messages 2009/03/29

[#24380] [Bug #1323](Assigned) Sockets broken on windows — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2009/07/16

Issue #1323 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#24383] Re: [Bug #1323](Assigned) Sockets broken on windows — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2009/07/16

Hello,

[#24388] Re: [Bug #1323](Assigned) Sockets broken on windows — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/07/16

In article <[email protected]>,

[#24397] Re: [Bug #1323](Assigned) Sockets broken on windows — Heesob Park <phasis@...> 2009/07/17

2009/7/16 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:

[#24410] [Bug #1323](Closed) Sockets broken on windows — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/17

Issue #1323 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#23052] [Bug #1324] Imap Tests hanging — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1324: Imap Tests hanging

3 messages 2009/03/29

[#24412] [Bug #1324](Feedback) Imap Tests hanging — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2009/07/17

Issue #1324 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.

[#28638] [Bug #1324](Rejected) Imap Tests hanging — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/03/13

Issue #1324 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23053] [Bug #1325] fiber tests kill windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1325: fiber tests kill windows

6 messages 2009/03/29

[#26184] [Bug #1325] fiber tests kill windows — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2009/10/20

Issue #1325 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#26199] Re: [Bug #1325] fiber tests kill windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/10/21

Hi,

[#23511] [Bug #1325] fiber tests kill windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/05/20

Issue #1325 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#26428] [Bug #1325] fiber tests kill windows — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2009/10/30

Issue #1325 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#29742] [Bug #1325](Closed) fiber tests kill windows — _ wanabe <redmine@...> 2010/04/22

Issue #1325 has been updated by _ wanabe.

[#23054] [Bug #1326] Failing unit tests on windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1326: Failing unit tests on windows

4 messages 2009/03/29

[#23059] Re: [Bug #1326] Failing unit tests on windows — James Gray <james@...> 2009/03/29

On Mar 29, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Charlie Savage wrote:

[#23061] Re: Failing unit tests on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2009/03/29

Hi James,

[#24288] [Bug #1326] Failing unit tests on windows — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/07/12

Issue #1326 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23060] [Bug #1327] CSV unit test failures on windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...>

Bug #1327: CSV unit test failures on windows

4 messages 2009/03/29

[#23069] Re: [Bug #1327] CSV unit test failures on windows — James Gray <james@...> 2009/03/30

On Mar 29, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Charlie Savage wrote:

[#23071] Re: [Bug #1327] CSV unit test failures on windows — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2009/03/30

Hi James,

[#23070] [Bug #1327] CSV unit test failures on windows — Charlie Savage <redmine@...> 2009/03/30

Issue #1327 has been updated by Charlie Savage.

[#23062] [Bug #1331] YAML misformats hash with ruby object as key — Simon Chiang <redmine@...>

Bug #1331: YAML misformats hash with ruby object as key

1 message 2009/03/30

[#23063] [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Damjan Rems <redmine@...>

Bug #1332: Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version

11 messages 2009/03/30

[#26840] [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/20

Issue #1332 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#26884] Re: [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2009/11/24

Hello,

[#26505] [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/11/03

Issue #1332 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#26515] Re: [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2009/11/04

Hello,

[#26536] Re: [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2009/11/04

> Currently, we has implemented the newline conversion as a

[#26609] Re: [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/11/08

> Do you think the current transcode design is also the cause of

[#28090] [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/02/06

Issue #1332 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29532] [Bug #1332](Closed) Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #1332 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#29534] [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/04/15

Issue #1332 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#29538] Re: [Bug #1332] Reading file on Windows is 500x slower then with previous Ruby version — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/15

Hi,

[#23064] What all does -U do? — James Gray <james@...>

The -U switch isn't listed in Ruby's help (-h).

2 messages 2009/03/30

[#23101] Re: What all does -U do? — James Gray <james@...> 2009/04/01

On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:45 AM, James Gray wrote:

[#23066] Rubyspec - Google Summer of Code — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...>

(This message is being sent to several lists, I apologize if you get more than

1 message 2009/03/30

[#23067] [Bug #1334] ruby-1.9.1-p0 cannot install libs to /usr/lib/ruby/1.9 anymore with --program-suffix — Richard Brown <redmine@...>

Bug #1334: ruby-1.9.1-p0 cannot install libs to /usr/lib/ruby/1.9 anymore with --program-suffix

1 message 2009/03/30

[#23074] [Bug #1335] RubyGems 1.3.1 gem method will load all gems beginning with the given name — Hal Brodigan <redmine@...>

Bug #1335: RubyGems 1.3.1 gem method will load all gems beginning with the given name

2 messages 2009/03/31

[#23079] Re: [Bug #1335] RubyGems 1.3.1 gem method will load all gems beginning with the given name — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/03/31

[#23075] [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brian Ford <redmine@...>

Bug #1336: Change in string representation of Floats

37 messages 2009/03/31

[#23116] [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/04/04

Issue #1336 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23118] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/04/04

On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Roger Pack <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23120] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/04/05

brian ford wrote:

[#23143] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — gus <gus@...> 2009/04/06

Increasing the precision will not make any difference.

[#23145] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/04/07

In article <C5FF8E50.259E9%[email protected]>,

[#23128] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/04/06

I agree with Brian.

[#23129] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zznmeb@...> 2009/04/06

Neither behavior demonstrated above is "incorrect". What is incorrect

[#23123] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/04/05

[#23126] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Daniel Luz <dev@...> 2009/04/05

On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 15:23, Brent Roman <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23179] [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/04/11

Issue #1336 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23181] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/04/11

[#23186] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/12

Hi,

[#23187] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/04/13

[#23188] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/13

Hi,

[#23191] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2009/04/13

Excerpts from Yukihiro Matsumoto's message of Mon Apr 13 05:17:28 +0300 2009:

[#23203] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/04/14

[#23189] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/04/13

[#23199] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2009/04/14

Hi,

[#23201] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2009/04/14

[#23202] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2009/04/14

Gary Wright wrote:

[#23206] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2009/04/14

[#23221] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2009/04/16

Gary Wright:

[#23223] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2009/04/17

[#23224] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2009/04/17

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 03:14:20AM +0200, Gary Wright wrote:

[#23240] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2009/04/17

[#23222] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Daniel Luz <dev@...> 2009/04/16

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 14:28, Gary Wright <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23200] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/04/14

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#23180] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/04/11

Hi,

[#23182] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/04/11

[#23232] [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/04/17

Issue #1336 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23235] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2009/04/17

Hi,

[#23076] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2009/03/31

Hi,

[#23077] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/03/31

Hi,

[#23078] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/03/31

[#23084] Re: [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — brian ford <brixen@...> 2009/03/31

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Ryan Davis <[email protected]> wrote:

[#23198] [Bug #1336] Change in string representation of Floats — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/04/14

Issue #1336 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#23081] [Bug #1340] Demo — Dave Moore <redmine@...>

Bug #1340: Demo

4 messages 2009/03/31

[#23091] [Bug #1340] Demo — Dave B <redmine@...> 2009/04/01

Issue #1340 has been updated by Dave B.

[#23089] [Bug #1340] Demo — Joshua Ballanco <redmine@...> 2009/04/01

Issue #1340 has been updated by Joshua Ballanco.

[#23085] [Bug #1340] Demo — Dave B <redmine@...> 2009/03/31

Issue #1340 has been updated by Dave B.

[#23082] [Bug #1341] pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests — Graham Agnew <redmine@...>

Bug #1341: pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests

6 messages 2009/03/31

[#29702] [Bug #1341] pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #1341 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#30035] [Bug #1341] pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests — Graham Agnew <redmine@...> 2010/05/05

Issue #1341 has been updated by Graham Agnew.

[#30040] Re: [Bug #1341] pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/05/06

Hi,

[#26709] [Bug #1341] pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests — Christian Höltje <redmine@...> 2009/11/12

Issue #1341 has been updated by Christian H旦ltje.

[#30090] [Bug #1341] pthread_cond_timedwait failing in 1.9.1-p0 thread tests — Graham Agnew <redmine@...> 2010/05/07

Issue #1341 has been updated by Graham Agnew.