[#61822] Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014 — Zachary Scott <e@...>
I would like to request developers meeting around April 17 or 18 in this mo=
14 messages
2014/04/03
[#61825] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2014/04/03
It's good if we have a meeting then.
[#61826] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/03
Regarding openssl issues, I=E2=80=99ve discussed possible meeting time with=
[#61833] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2014/04/03
Hi,
[#61847] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/03
Martin Boテ殕et <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61849] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I will post summary of meeting on Google docs after the meeting.
[#61852] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/04/04
Zachary Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
[#61860] Re: Plan Developers Meeting Japan April 2014
— Zachary Scott <e@...>
2014/04/04
I=E2=80=99m ok with redmine, thanks for bringing up your concern!
[#62076] Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer. — Tomoyuki Chikanaga <nagachika00@...>
Hello,
7 messages
2014/04/17
[#62078] Re: Candidacy to 2.1 branch maintainer.
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <shibata.hiroshi@...>
2014/04/17
> And does anyone have counter proposal for 2.1 maintenance?
[ruby-core:62086] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9518] Objects in large arrays are leaked
From:
tarui@...
Date:
2014-04-18 09:57:48 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62086
Issue #9518 has been updated by Masaya Tarui.
Sorry for such a late response.
I agree.
At the first time, I was introduled for reducing minor GC's long time
by rescan of huge size array.
But in real case, if there are huge size array, there may be other huge data too.
No matter how it do, it have to take time.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9518: Objects in large arrays are leaked
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9518#change-46250
* Author: Charlie Somerville
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.0p0 (2013-12-25 revision 44422) [x86_64-darwin13.0]
* Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
a = [nil] * 131071
loop { a << Object.new; a.pop }
# process RSS stays stable
a = [nil] * 131072
loop { a << Object.new; a.pop }
# process RSS grows quickly and never falls
It seems to be related to this bit of code: https://github.com/github/ruby/blob/2.1/gc.c#L4764-4766
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/