[#85349] [Ruby trunk Bug#14334] Segmentation fault after running rspec (ruby/2.5.0/erb.rb:885 / simplecov/source_file.rb:85) — pragtob@...
Issue #14334 has been updated by PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer).
3 messages
2018/02/02
[#85358] Re: [ruby-cvs:69220] nobu:r62039 (trunk): compile.c: unnecessary freezing — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2018/02/03
[#85612] Why require autoconf 2.67+ — leam hall <leamhall@...>
Please pardon the intrusion; I am new to Ruby and like to pull the
6 messages
2018/02/17
[#85616] Re: Why require autoconf 2.67+
— Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2018/02/18
VGhpcyBjb3VsZCBoZWxwIHlvdSB0byBidWlsZCBSdWJ5IHdpdGggb2xkZXIgYXV0b2NvbmYgKDIu
[#85634] [Ruby trunk Bug#14494] [PATCH] tool/m4/ruby_replace_type.m4 use AC_CHECK_TYPES for HAVE_* macros — normalperson@...
Issue #14494 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2018/02/19
[#85674] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — matz@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
5 messages
2018/02/20
[#85686] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/20
[email protected] wrote:
[#85704] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/02/21
On 2018/02/20 18:06, Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:85491] Re: [ruby-cvs:69220] nobu:r62039 (trunk): compile.c: unnecessary freezing
From:
Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Date:
2018-02-10 01:02:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85491
On 2018/02/03 16:30, Eric Wong wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> https://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision&revision=62039 >> >> Log: >> compile.c: unnecessary freezing >> >> * compile.c (iseq_peephole_optimize): get rid of freezing >> dynamically created string to be duplicated immediately. > > We don't need to check for String#+@ redefinitions? Redefined method will be called. The only difference should be that the receiver is frozen or not. > Considering String#+@ and String#-@ look like syntax elements > and are relatively new; can get rid of redefinition check in > opt_str_uminus? If we add `opt_str_uplus`, it will consume TOS without operands, whereas `opt_str_uminus` has an operand but no stack. I think `opt_str_uminus` is misnamed (and `opt_str_freeze` too). Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>