[#85349] [Ruby trunk Bug#14334] Segmentation fault after running rspec (ruby/2.5.0/erb.rb:885 / simplecov/source_file.rb:85) — pragtob@...
Issue #14334 has been updated by PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer).
3 messages
2018/02/02
[#85358] Re: [ruby-cvs:69220] nobu:r62039 (trunk): compile.c: unnecessary freezing — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2018/02/03
[#85612] Why require autoconf 2.67+ — leam hall <leamhall@...>
Please pardon the intrusion; I am new to Ruby and like to pull the
6 messages
2018/02/17
[#85616] Re: Why require autoconf 2.67+
— Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2018/02/18
VGhpcyBjb3VsZCBoZWxwIHlvdSB0byBidWlsZCBSdWJ5IHdpdGggb2xkZXIgYXV0b2NvbmYgKDIu
[#85634] [Ruby trunk Bug#14494] [PATCH] tool/m4/ruby_replace_type.m4 use AC_CHECK_TYPES for HAVE_* macros — normalperson@...
Issue #14494 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2018/02/19
[#85674] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — matz@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
5 messages
2018/02/20
[#85686] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/20
[email protected] wrote:
[#85704] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/02/21
On 2018/02/20 18:06, Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:85670] [Ruby trunk Feature#14468][Rejected] Add Proc#dig
From:
matz@...
Date:
2018-02-20 06:09:47 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85670
Issue #14468 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
Status changed from Open to Rejected
The original intention for `dig` is a short-hand traversal of array-hash trees. I don't think it's normal to use `proc` objects as tree nodes.
Matz.
----------------------------------------
Feature #14468: Add Proc#dig
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14468#change-70462
* Author: bradleybuda (Bradley Buda)
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
Since Proc already responds to [], it would be cool if Procs could participate in a recursive dig. Like this:
Current Behavior:
~~~
obj = [
0,
{
a: ->(x) { x * 2 },
b: "c"
},
]
obj[1][:a][4] == 8 # true
obj.dig(1, :a, 4) == 8 # TypeError (Proc does not have #dig method)
~~~
Desired behavior:
~~~
obj.dig(1, :a, 4) == 8 # true
~~~
I am willing to implement this but I wanted to see if the devs think it is a good idea first. If there are no objections, I'll put together a patch.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>