'How India Exercises Right To Defend Itself Is Up To India,' Says EAM Jaishankar

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar asserted on Friday that India reserves the unequivocal right to defend itself against terrorism, emphasising that the manner of exercising this right lies solely with New Delhi.

Speaking at the inauguration of Shaastra 2026, the techno-entertainment festival at IIT-Madras in Chennai, he underscored that no external power can dictate India's defensive measures.

Jaishankar directly referenced India's challenging neighbourhood, particularly the western border, where a neighbour persists in sponsoring terrorism deliberately and unrepentantly. He affirmed that India will take whatever actions are necessary to protect its citizens, rejecting any interference in its strategic choices.

The Minister linked this stance to longstanding grievances, noting a decades-old water-sharing agreement that has been undermined by persistent cross-border terrorism. He argued that good neighbourliness cannot coexist with such aggression, stating plainly that one cannot demand resource sharing while perpetuating violence.

This position aligns with India's broader foreign policy philosophy of 'Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam'—the world is one family—yet Jaishankar clarified it does not imply naivety towards hostility. Instead, he portrayed India's approach as pragmatic problem-solving, maximising impact through competitiveness, strengths, and institutional leverage amid limited resources.

Turning to India's eastern neighbour, Jaishankar recounted his recent visit to Dhaka for the funeral of former Bangladesh Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia, just two days prior. He expressed India's instinct to extend kindness and assistance to neighbours who are not harmful, highlighting a policy of reciprocity.

Most of India's neighbours, he observed, now recognise that India's economic growth serves as a rising tide lifting the entire region. This realisation fosters mutual benefit, with Jaishankar conveying the same message during his Bangladesh trip ahead of their elections.

He expressed optimism that post-election stability in Bangladesh would enhance regional neighbourliness, building on India's supportive role. The remarks reflect New Delhi's dual-track diplomacy: firm resolve against threats on one flank and constructive engagement elsewhere.

Jaishankar's speech at Shaastra 2026 thus encapsulated India's neighbourhood policy evolution—from enduring provocations without retaliation to assertive self-defence, while nurturing ties with cooperative partners. This balance underscores a maturing strategic posture amid South Asia's complex geopolitics.

Based On ANI Report

Comments

Continue Reading

'We Did Not Ask 'Religion' of Terrorists, We Targeted Terror Not Civilians, Military Establishments' Says Defence Minister Rajnath Singh

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh invoked the successes of the 2016 surgical strikes, 2019 Balakot air strikes, and Operation Sindoor as evidence of India’s unwavering stance on national security and sovereignty.

Speaking at a Jain International Trade Community (JITO) event in Hyderabad on October 3, he clarified that the armed forces do not discriminate based on religion or identity, emphasizing, “When we responded to the Pahalgam terror attack, we did not ask the dharma of the terrorists—we targeted terror, not civilians or military establishments”.

Singh stressed that India’s growing military and economic capabilities serve defensive—not aggressive—purposes. The aim, he said, is to safeguard the country’s civilizational values and the humane, spiritual teachings inspired by Lord Mahavira, rather than to assert dominance over other nations.

He highlighted the exceptional growth in India’s defence sector exports, pointing out a surge from ₹600 crore in 2014 to over ₹24,000 crore today. Singh expressed confidence that India’s defence exports would exceed ₹50,000 crore by 2029, underlining the expanding global demand for Indian military hardware such as TEJAS fighter jets, Akash missiles, and Arjun tanks.

Singh described this progress as a testament to India’s journey towards self-reliance, referencing the recent government deal for the procurement of 97 Light Combat Aircraft from Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, with an indigenous content of more than 64 percent.

He stated that India’s manufacturing ecosystem now spans from “toys to tanks,” signalling rapid advancement towards making India a global manufacturing hub, positioned to eventually become the “factory of the world”.

Regarding economic growth, the Defence Minister noted that India currently ranks as the world’s fourth-largest economy. He projected that with a GDP of $7.3 trillion by 2030, India is set to become the third-largest economy globally.

Quoting International Monetary Fund (IMF) reports, Singh added that, by purchasing power parity (PPP), India is on track to become the world’s second-largest economy by 2038.

Singh also praised the impact of noted Jain personalities—including Dr. Vikram Sarabhai, Dr. DS Kothari, Dr. Jagdish Chandra Jain, and Dr. Meenakshi Jain—whose legacies, he said, continue to inspire the nation.

He lauded ongoing government efforts to preserve Jain heritage, including the return of more than 20 stolen Tirthankara idols from abroad and recognition of Prakrit (the language of Jain scriptures) as a Classical Language of India.

Urging citizens to be inspired by the teachings of Lord Mahavira, Singh concluded by appealing to national values of non-violence, truth, and Aparigraha (Non-Possessiveness), as India strives to become a developed nation by 2047.

Based On UNI Report

Comments

Continue Reading

Development Status of Longer-Range And Highly Advanced BrahMos-NG (Next Generation)

The BrahMos missile a flagship program, is advancing on two significant fronts: the development of an extended-range BrahMos missile and the next-generation, sleeker BrahMos-NG (Next Generation) variant.

Extended-Range BrahMos

Originally, the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile had its range capped at 290 km due to Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) restrictions. After India joined the MTCR in 2016, these limitations were lifted, enabling the program to push the missile’s range further. The first step was the BrahMos-ER (Extended Range), which increased the reach to 450 km.

Recent breakthroughs have seen the successful testing of a new BrahMos variant with an 800 km range, marking a historic leap in India’s strategic strike capabilities. This longer-range missile, sometimes referred to as BrahMos-LR, retains compatibility with existing launch platforms across the Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force, allowing for seamless integration and rapid deployment.

The extended range significantly enhances India’s ability to strike deep into adversary territory, including all of Pakistan and parts of Chinese-occupied Tibet, while allowing the Indian Navy to target enemy warships and land installations from safer stand-off distances. The missile maintains its hallmark supersonic speed (Mach 2.8–3), pinpoint accuracy, and low radar visibility, making it a formidable deterrent and first-strike option.

Key Features of The Deadly Supersonic Cruise Missile

Precision Strike: It can strike target points with exact accuracy, with a Circular Error Probability (CEP) of less than 1 meter.

Cross-Platform Launch: The missile can be launched from air, sea, and submarine platforms.

Special Feature: BrahMos is equipped with a reduced radar signature, boosting its stealth and endurance.

Heavy Warhead: It has the potential to carry a warhead of up to 300 kg and is capable of destroying strong structures or targets.

Advanced Guidance: The missiles are armed with INS and GPS for guidance and have an active radar seeker.

Quick Reaction: The high speed of the missile lessens the enemy's reaction time and gives it a strategic upper hand.

BrahMos-NG (Next Generation)

Parallel to the range extension, the BrahMos-NG is in advanced stages of development. This next-generation missile is a compact, lighter, and more versatile version of the original BrahMos. Weighing around 1.33–1.5 tonnes—about half the weight of the current air-launched BrahMos—the NG variant is designed for broader deployment across multiple platforms. While the current air-launched BrahMos is primarily mounted on the Sukhoi Su-30MKI, the BrahMos-NG will be suitable for other fighter jets including the indigenous TEJAS, MiG-29K, and potentially the Rafale. Its reduced size and weight mean that a Su-30MKI could carry up to four BrahMos-NG missiles, while the TEJAS could carry two, greatly increasing the firepower per sortie.

Despite its smaller size, the BrahMos-NG will retain a range of 290 km and achieve higher speeds (up to Mach 3.5), with a reduced radar cross-section for enhanced stealth. It will also incorporate advanced technologies such as an AESA radar seeker, improving accuracy and survivability against modern air defence systems. The missile is expected to be ready for flight testing by 2026, with production projected to begin between 2027 and 2028.

The first successful test of the 800 km variant, known as BrahMos-LR, was recently conducted in the Bay of Bengal, significantly enhancing India’s ability to strike deep targets and bolstering its deterrence posture. This extended range allows the Indian military to engage targets across Pakistan and even into Chinese-occupied territories, while maintaining compatibility with existing launch platforms.

Technologically, the BrahMos-NG will feature a reduced radar cross-section, making it harder for enemy air defences to detect and intercept. It will also be equipped with an AESA radar for improved targeting, and its speed will be slightly higher than the original, reaching up to Mach 3.5. The missile is expected to be ready for flight testing within a year and for induction within two to three years. The Indian Air Force has already indicated a requirement for 400 BrahMos-NG missiles, with production facilities being set up to meet this demand.

Operationally, the BrahMos missile has already demonstrated its effectiveness. During the recent confrontation with Pakistan, the Indian Air Force used the air-launched BrahMos from Su-30MKI jets to conduct precision strikes on Pakistani air bases, successfully evading Chinese-supplied air defence systems. This combat debut underscored the missile’s speed, accuracy, and strategic value, reinforcing its status as a primary deterrent weapon for the Indian armed forces.

Operational Impact And Recent Use

The BrahMos air-launched version has already proven its effectiveness in recent operations. During the May 2025 confrontation with Pakistan, the Indian Air Force deployed BrahMos missiles from Su-30MKI jets to strike Pakistani air bases with precision, reportedly evading interception by enemy air defences. This operational debut not only validated the missile’s deterrent value but also demonstrated India’s readiness to employ advanced strategic assets when required.

Strategic Significance

Both the extended-range BrahMos and the BrahMos-NG represent a substantial leap in India’s offensive and deterrent capabilities. The former broadens the strategic reach of Indian forces across all domains, while the latter promises greater flexibility and rapid response options for the Air Force. Together, these advancements ensure that BrahMos remains at the forefront of India’s missile arsenal, capable of shaping regional power dynamics and strengthening national security.

The development of the longer-range BrahMos and the sleeker BrahMos-NG is firmly on track, with both programs poised to deliver significant enhancements to India’s military capabilities within the next few years.

IDN

Comments

Continue Reading

India Planning Military Action In Next 24-36 Hours, Will Face Consequences: Pakistan Minister

On April 30, 2025, Pakistan’s Federal Minister for Information, Attaullah Tarar, publicly stated that Islamabad had “credible intelligence” indicating that India was preparing to launch military action against Pakistan within the next 24 to 36 hours.

Tarar accused the Indian government of planning an attack based on “baseless and concocted allegations” regarding Pakistan’s alleged involvement in the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 tourists and has sharply escalated tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.

The Pahalgam attack on April 22, 2025, marked one of the deadliest assaults on Indian civilians since the 2008 Mumbai attacks. India immediately blamed Pakistan-based militants for the attack, a charge that Islamabad has strongly denied. In response, India expelled Pakistani diplomats, suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, closed its borders, and revoked visas for Pakistani nationals. Pakistan retaliated by suspending the Simla Agreement, closing its airspace and trade routes to India, and expelling Indian diplomats.

Since the attack, there have been reports of armed skirmishes and exchanges of gunfire along the Line of Control (LoC), with both sides deploying additional military assets to the border regions. Security experts and international observers have warned that the situation is rapidly deteriorating, with both sides taking unprecedented steps to suspend longstanding agreements and diplomatic channels.

Minister Tarar emphasised that Pakistan had itself been a victim of terrorism and has always condemned it in all forms. He stated that Islamabad had offered a “credible, transparent and independent” investigation by a neutral commission of experts, but accused India of evading such a probe and instead choosing a confrontational path.

Tarar warned that any Indian military adventurism would be “responded to assuredly and decisively,” and that the responsibility for any escalation and its consequences would “squarely lie with India”. Pakistan has called for international attention, urging the global community to remain vigilant and to discourage any further escalation.

The United States and China have both called for restraint, with the US State Department confirming it is reaching out to both New Delhi and Islamabad to urge de-escalation. Analysts note that while India faces significant domestic pressure to respond forcefully to the Pahalgam attack, any military action risks triggering a rapid and dangerous escalation between the two nuclear-armed nations.

Pakistan’s claim of imminent Indian military action has intensified an already volatile situation, with both sides issuing strong warnings and taking steps that have dismantled key diplomatic safeguards. The international community is closely monitoring developments, aware that even a limited military exchange could spiral into a broader conflict.

PTI

Comments

Continue Reading

Knocking Knees: ‘We Will Make Them Pay’: Pakistan Defence Minister Threatens Retaliation If India Acts Across Border

Tensions between India and Pakistan have reached a dangerous high following the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed the lives of at least 26 people, mostly tourists, on April 22, 2025.

The attack, carried out by terrorists in the Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, has been described as one of the deadliest against Indian civilians in the region in decades. Eyewitnesses reported that the assailants specifically targeted non-Muslims, questioning victims about their religious identity before opening fire.

The Resistance Front, an offshoot of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, claimed responsibility for the massacre. Indian authorities have accused this group of operating as a proxy for Pakistan’s military intelligence, an allegation Islamabad has firmly denied.

In the immediate aftermath, India took a series of unprecedented diplomatic and economic measures: expelling Pakistani diplomats, suspending visas for Pakistani nationals, closing border crossings, and withdrawing from the Indus Waters Treaty. Pakistan responded by suspending the Shimla Agreement, closing its own borders and airspace to Indian traffic, and instituting a complete trade embargo. 

Diplomatic channels between the two nuclear-armed neighbours have all but collapsed, with both sides recalling their high commissioners and reducing embassy staff to bare minimums.

Amidst this escalating crisis, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif issued a stern warning during a press briefing, threatening retaliation if India undertakes any cross-border military action. Asif declared, “If India conducts acts of terrorism in our cities, it will be tit for tat - and we will make them pay,” further alleging that Pakistan had intelligence about potential Indian plans to target Pakistani cities.

He categorically denied any Pakistani involvement in the Pahalgam attack, stating, “There is absolutely no connection to us in this incident. We don’t support terrorism under any circumstances, and innocent people should not be the target anywhere in any local conflicts”.

Pakistan’s National Security Committee echoed Asif’s warnings, stating that any threat to Pakistan’s sovereignty would be met with “firm reciprocal measures in all domains,” and that any attempt to divert river waters would be considered an act of war and responded to with full force.

The Pakistani government has also highlighted what it calls India’s “systemic persecution of minorities” and accused New Delhi of exploiting the tragedy for political gain, while reiterating its support for the Kashmiri right to self-determination.

On the ground, military tensions have intensified, with both sides increasing troop deployments and reporting a spike in ceasefire violations along the Line of Control. International observers have expressed concern over the potential for miscalculation and further escalation between the two countries, both of which possess nuclear arsenals.

The Pahalgam terror attack has plunged India-Pakistan relations into one of their most volatile phases in recent history. With diplomatic ties severed, economic links cut, and both militaries on high alert, the threat of further escalation looms large, especially in light of Pakistan’s explicit warnings of retaliation against any Indian cross-border action.

Comments

Continue Reading

'Compromising India's Security': Congress Targets Centre Over U.S. Aid To Pakistan's F-16 Fleet

The Congress party in India has criticised the Modi government's diplomatic strategy following reports that the United States has allocated $397 million for the maintenance of Pakistan's F-16 fighter jet fleet.

This move by the Trump administration has raised concerns about the potential compromise of India's security interests, given Pakistan's historical use of F-16s against India.

The Congress party argues that this decision highlights a pattern of U.S. military support to Pakistan, which could undermine India's security, especially considering past instances where Pakistan has used F-16s against India.

The recent decision by President Donald Trump to allocate $397 million for Pakistan's F-16 fleet maintenance raises critical questions about the Modi government's diplomatic efficacy.

This move, reminiscent of the 2022 Biden administration's $450 million package for the same…

— Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 (@Pawankhera) February 25, 2025

The opposition party called for a reassessment of India's foreign policy priorities to safeguard national interests.

This move, similar to the Biden administration's $450 million package in 2022, underscores a pattern of U.S. military support to Pakistan. Khera argues that such actions could compromise India's security interests, especially considering Pakistan's past use of F-16s against India.

Pawan Khera, the media and publicity department head of the Congress party, highlighted that during the UPA years (2004–2014), India and the United States significantly strengthened their strategic and defence ties. Khera said this period saw advancements in several key areas, such as:

The UPA government focused on modernizing India's military capabilities through strategic partnerships with the US. This included major defence acquisitions such as the C-130J Super Hercules and the C-17 Globemaster III, which enhanced India's strategic airlift and rapid deployment capabilities.

The UPA era witnessed significant cooperation in technology transfer, which was crucial for upgrading India's defence systems. The Defence Framework Agreement of 2005 laid the groundwork for expanded defence cooperation, including technology transfer.

A landmark achievement during this period was the Indo-U.S. Civil Nuclear Deal in 2008. This agreement lifted a three-decade U.S. ban on nuclear trade with India, allowing access to civilian nuclear technology and fuel from the U.S. and other Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) countries. This move strengthened India's energy security and global standing.

Khera emphasised that these initiatives not only bolstered India's defence capabilities but also enhanced its global influence. He underscored the Congress party's approach of maintaining strategic autonomy, suggesting that this approach allowed India to navigate complex international relationships while safeguarding its national interests.

Additionally, Khera expressed concerns about India's defence negotiations, particularly the proposed acquisition of F-35 fighter jets from the U.S., which he criticized for being costly and operationally challenging. He noted that Russia's offer to produce advanced Su-57 jets in India could be a more viable alternative

Pawan Khera emphasised the need for a reassessment of India's foreign policy priorities to safeguard national interests. He pointed out that during the UPA years (2004-2014), India and the U.S. strengthened their strategic and defence cooperation, which bolstered India's defence capabilities and global influence.

Khera also questioned the Modi government's approach to defence negotiations, including the proposed purchase of F-35 fighter jets from the U.S., which he criticized as costly and operationally challenging.

The U.S. funding for Pakistan's F-16 fleet is part of a broader security-related exemption from a 90-day freeze on foreign aid. The funds are intended to ensure that Pakistan uses the jets for counter-terrorism operations and not against India, under strict oversight by a U.S.-backed monitoring program.

This development has sparked debate about the implications for India's security and the effectiveness of its diplomatic efforts with the U.S.

TOI News Network

Comments

Continue Reading

Donald Trump Reveals What PM Modi Said When A Country Threatened India

Washington: Former US President Donald Trump has revealed what Prime Minister Narendra Modi said when offered help in dealing with a country that threatened India and said the Indian leader remarked "I will do it, I will do it, I will do anything necessary". Trump made the remarks in a podcast called 'Flagrant' with comedians Andrew Schultz and Akash Singh.

Lavishing high praise on PM Modi, Trump described him "great", "a friend", "nicest human being" and a leader who is tough in dealing with India's adversaries when required.

Trump spoke about how PM Modi told him that India can deal with a threatening Pakistan after being offered US support. Trump imitated PM Modi's remarks and his tough tone and tenor on the question of dealing with the western neighbour who has been sponsoring cross-border terrorism.

"We have very good relationship. He is nicest human being but we had couple of occasions where somebody was threatening India. I said let me help. (Trump imitating PM Modi). 'I will do it, I will do it, I will do anything necessary. We have defeated them for hundreds of years'....Same country you can probably guess. I said wow what happened there," Trump said.without naming Pakistan.

Trump also said that before Narendra Modi assumed office as India's Prime Minister in 2014, there was instability due to frequent changes in the leadership.

"Before him they were replacing them (PMs) every year, it was very unstable. He came along, he's great, he's a friend of mine. On the outside he looks like he's your father he's the nicest...," said Trump, who is seeking re-election as US President.

Trump also talked about the success of 'Howdy Modi' event in Houston, Texas, in 2019 when he was the President.

"They filled up the stadium, it was beautiful like 80,000 people it was going crazy and we're walking around today....we were walking in the middle, waving to everybody," he said.

Trump also said he has very good relationship with PM Modi.

Trump spoke about his relationship with PM Modi around the 37 minute mark of 88 minute-long interview.

'Howdy Modi' was an Indian diaspora event in Houston, Texas in 2019. The event at NRG Stadium saw a huge crowd and showcased the relationship between the two countries. PM Modi and Trump addressed the gathering.

Trump has praised PM Modi earlier too and has described him a "fantastic man".

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed

Comments

Continue Reading

KNEES Are Knocking: Violation of Pakistan's Territorial Sovereignty To Be Met With Swift Response Says Army Chief Asim Munir

Mirage-2000 fighters were used by the IAF to strike deep inside Pakistani terror targets in Feb 2019

Islamabad: Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir on Monday warned that any provocation or violation of the country's territorial sovereignty would be met with a "swift and resolute response." Gen Munir, who visited the Line of Actual Control, offered Eid prayers with officers and soldiers on the occasion of Eid ul-Azha, The Express Tribune newspaper reported.

Addressing the troops, he said, "Pakistan has always supported peace and stability in the region; however, any provocation or violation of Pakistan's territorial sovereignty will be met with a swift and resolute response, with the full support of the nation, Insha Allah."

"As soldiers, we take pride in celebrating such festivities away from our homes and loved ones while on duty, ensuring the security of our country and fellow citizens," he said.

He also spoke about the Kashmir issue, the report said.

The Pakistani leadership on Monday urged people to promote the spirit of sacrifice, brotherhood and selflessness amidst various challenges faced by the cash-strapped country.

President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called for promoting the spirit of sacrifice, brotherhood and selflessness.

(With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

'People To Whom Message Was Intended, Hopefully Got It': Jaishankar On India's Response After Uri, Pulwama Attacks

New Delhi: Drawing a comparison of India's response after the 26/11 terror attacks and those in Uri and Pulwama, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that New Delhi showed that those behind these activities won't be safe even if they have crossed the border.

He was interacting with industrialists at an open discussion on Viksit Bharat @2047 in the national capital. The event was organized by PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PHDCCI).

Addressing the event, Jaishankar said, "Look at our response to 26/11 in Mumbai and look at our response to Uri and Balakot. I think nothing can tell you more clearly, more sharply, because, you know, at the end of the day, the armed forces are the same, the bureaucracy is the same, the intelligence is the same. So if you look at what are the structural inputs and responses of the system, it would be the same."

Jaishankar said that India's response after the Uri and Pulwama attacks sent a "clear, direct message" and the people to whom it was "hopefully got it."

"Something as big as 26/11 happened without a strong response from our side and that in many ways led to a feeling that this country can be punched and pushed...Uri and Balakot were meant to demonstrate that no, life will not go on and that there will be a price and don't think because you've done something and run away to that side, that you are safe there," the EAM said.

"You will not be safe there. It will not be safe across the Line of Control or international borders. So there was a clear, direct message out there and I think the people to whom that message was intended to be sent, hopefully got it," he added.

A group of heavily armed terrorists from the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba unleashed mayhem on the streets of Mumbai on November 26, 2008, spraying bullets on unarmed civilians at multiple key public installations in the city. The attacks left over 166 dead, including foreigners, and over 300 injured.

India carried out a surgical strike against terror camps in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoK) in response to an attack at an army base in Uri, Kashmir in 2016.

In 2019, after the Pulwama attack -- which killed over 40 Indian CRPF soldiers -- the Indian Air Force carried out an airstrike against Pakistani terror camps in Balakot.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed

Comments

Continue Reading

S Jaishankar Reminds On 'Non-Response' By Congress Govt To 26/11 Mumbai Attacks

S Jaishankar said that India gave a "clear message" against terrorism surgical strike

New Delhi: Reminding "non-response" to the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that India gave a 'clear message' against terrorism with the surgical strike and airstrikes after the terror attacks in Uri and Pulwama.

He said that the world was sympathetic with India after 26/11 but also wanted New Delhi not to create any 'tensions' with Islamabad. The EAM added that it was because India had not worked to "delegitimize terrorism" and convince the world that it is a danger for everyone globally.

Mr Jaishankar was speaking at an event titled 'India's Vishwabandhu Approach to Global Relations' at the Constitution Club in Mumbai on Monday.

"When 26/11 happened you all know what our response was or to be very frank, what our non-response was. But you also know that our response was very different in Uri and Balakot. And there was a reason. Because Uri was across the Line of Control and Balakot was across the international boundary," Mr Jaishankar said addressing the event.

"So the message was, if you come and do something here, you may be across the LoC, you may be across the international boundary- we will still come and get you there," he added.

A group of heavily armed terrorists from the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba unleashed mayhem on the streets of Mumbai on November 26, 2008, spraying bullets on unarmed civilians at multiple key public installations in the city. The attacks left over 166 dead, including foreigners, and over 300 injured.

India carried out a surgical strike against terror camps in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in response to an attack at an army base in Uri, Kashmir in 2016. In 2019, after the Pulwama attack -- which killed over 40 Indian soldiers -- the Indian Air Force carried out an airstrike against Pakistani terror camps in Balakot.

The EAM further said that India had not lobbied the world against terrorism and couldn't make them understand that anyone can be the victim of the menace.

"Now, I want you to think for a moment, about the reaction of the world. When 26/11 happened, everybody said yes very bad, we sympathize with you...but do not create tensions with Pakistan. Because we had not lobbied the world, we had not made the world understand what terrorism is, it is a danger for all...Today, it is my turn, tomorrow it will be yours," the EAM said.

Further elaborating why the world understood India's response in Uri and Balakot but was 'tense' after the 26/11 attacks, Mr Jaishankar said being a 'Vishwa Bandhu' a country can carry the world with its viewpoint.

"By the time from 2008, we had reached 2016 actually. We did Uri (surgical strikes) and the world said the Indians did what the Indians had to do. We did Balakot (Air strikes)...- Why was it that the world was understanding about Uri and Balakot, but the world was so tense, or I would say, indifferent on 26/11 because a lot of people sympathized with us, but stopped there," the EAM said.

"And the reason is that we had not made that effort to delegitimize terrorism, to convince the world...Being Vishwa Bandhu, if you are able to carry the world with your viewpoint, you are that much stronger, you have that ability," he added.

Earlier in the day, EAM Jaishankar also attended an interaction with investors, students, and social media influencers, wherein he emphasized that India needs a "strong and experienced" government

"A very productive day in Mumbai, interacting with investors, social media influencers, students and intellectuals. Stressed that in a turbulent and uncertain world, India needs a strong and experienced Government with the judgement and confidence to take the right calls. The last 10 years have laid the foundation for Viksit Bharat. Our choices now will ensure that we will progress towards that goal by 2047," Mr Jaishankar said in a social media post on X.

(With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

No Dossiers On Terror Now; Bharat Ghar Mein Ghus Ke Marta Hai: PM Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday said that unlike the practice during Congress regime of sending dossiers to Pakistan after the Mumbai terror attacks, the BJP-led government hits terrorists on their home turf.

“During the Congress regime, the news headlines were about India handing over another dossier to Pakistan about terror activities. “It used to be big news. Some of our friends in the media used to clap after any such dossier was sent,” Modi said at an election rally in Maharashtra's Latur.

“Today, India doesn't send dossiers. Aaj Bharat ghar mein ghus ke marta hai (Today, India kills terrorists on their home turf)," Modi said. “The headlines in Naya Bharat are: Mission LOC, India punishes Pakistan through surgical strikes,” Modi said.

Modi also claimed that the INDIA bloc has come up with a "formula" whereby the parties in the opposition alliance will get the PM's post for one year each if they come to power." With such a system, the good of the country cannot be expected, Modi said.

“Some people want to make the PM in instalments. They hey have decided to have a PM each year,” he said. Modi said Congress destroyed India's economy during its regime. Targeting Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Modi said, “When I speak of 'EK Bharat Shreshtha Bharat', the Prince of Congress suffers from fever”. “Those who looted the country are behind bars. Those who looted the country will have to pay back. And this is Modi's guarantee,” he said.

“The people of our country have always been hardworking and talented, but the Congress party committed the sin of crushing their dreams,” he said. The Congress thought about only one family, but Modi thinks about every family of Bharat, he said. “In 2014 and 2019, you gave us a huge mandate. We utilised it not to snatch anything from anyone, but to provide benefits and ensure welfare. Ours is a government that truly gives strength to social justice,” Modi said.

(With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

UPA Debated, Decided To Do Nothing After 2008 Attacks, Claims EAM S Jaishankar

S Jaishankar said India has some challenges at the borders and the key to defend them is not to just posture in public but to build infrastructure, support the military and create a system that will respond whenever the border is under threat

Hyderabad: The previous UPA government decided "not to do anything" after the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks with the justification that "it would cost more to attack Pakistan than not attacking it", External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar claimed on Tuesday.

Describing India as a voice of the 'Global South' (comprising about 125 countries), he said the countries of the Global South trust India to take up their cause and positions in the world.

Addressing a gathering at a talk on 'Foreign Policy the India Way: From Diffidence to Confidence', the minister said that the country has a moral obligation towards some of the countries, which were under colonial rule and could not recover, rebuild as quickly as India did.

"We are a voice of the Global South, which is about a 125 countries in the world. These countries trust India to take up their cause, their positions in the world," he said.

He said India has some challenges at the borders and the key to defend them is not to just posture in public but to build infrastructure, support the military and create a system that will respond whenever the border is under threat.

In the "defensive era", terrorism was accepted, he said, referring to the previous UPA tenure.

"After Mumbai (attacks), the national security advisor of the previous UPA government wrote (that) 'we sat, we debated. We considered all the options. Then we decided to do nothing. We decided to do nothing and the justification was we felt the cost of attacking Pakistan was more than the cost of not attacking Pakistan', " he claimed, adding, "I leave you to judge."

Talking about how the foreign policy moved from the times of "diffidence" to confidence, he said, "we moved from diffidence to confidence when we crossed that line of control. And, we did it again, when we crossed the boundary to go and hit Balakot".

The country now deals with the United States much more confidently than it used to deal before, he said.

Asked should the country be exporting BrahMos missiles to other countries as well, after the Philippines, he said it is a very good example how Make in India and defence has got the country an important contact.

"But, it's not just BrahMos. It would be other equipment as well. I think this is new area that India is entering. (PM) Modi ji has been very strongly motivating our defence producers saying we are good enough today to go out in the world. So, I am very confident that our defence exports will grow," he said.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed

Comments

Continue Reading

India Has Capability To Hit Its Targets Within And Across Border: Defence Minister

Kathua: Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Monday said India under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership has shown to the world that it has the power to hit its targets within and across the border in the aftermath of Uri and Pulwama terror attacks.

The terrorists attacked an army camp in the border town of Uri in September 2016, resulting in the killing of 19 soldiers. A fortnight later, the Indian Army carried out a surgical strike across the border and destroyed launch pads for terrorists.

In February 2019, over 40 CRPF personnel were killed in a suicide attack on their convoy by the terrorists in Pulwama district of south Kashmir. Twelve days after the attack, the Indian Air Force (AIF) destroyed the terrorist camp in Balakote, Pakistan.

Addressing an election rally in support of BJP candidate Jitendra Singh here, he said, “Earlier India was considered as a soft state…India has neither attacked any country nor occupied any foreign land which is its character.”

“But when Uri and Pulwama happened, India gave a strong message that we will not touch anyone but if touched by someone we will not leave them,” he added.

Singh, Union Minister of state in the Prime Minister’s office, is seeking his re-election for the third term from Udhampur parliamentary constituency which is going to polls in the first phase on April 19.

“We have the capability and power to hit (our targets) anywhere within and across our borders. The power of India increased in the world (after the surgical strikes),” he said, giving credit to Prime Minister Modi’s leadership.

Referring to the safe evacuation of over 22,500 Indian students in the midst of war between Ukraine and Russia in early 2022, he said the fighting between the two countries stopped for over four hours after Modi established contact with the presidents of the two countries and the US.

“The concerned parents of these students started demanding for the return of their wards from the war-torn country and the government facilitated their safe return (to their homes),” he said.

The senior BJP leader said there is hardly any person in the country who had not benefitted from the government schemes over the last 10 years.

“The corona vaccination was ensured to all citizens without any charge and it was possible only because of the strong leadership,” he said.

Later briefly talking to reporters, the defence minister exuded confidence in winning all the Lok Sabha seats from Jammu and Kashmir.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed

Comments

Continue Reading

'Uri Is Our Reply...': Jaishankar On India's Stance Against Cross-Border Terrorism Under PM Modi

Bikaner: External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday reaffirmed India's unwavering stance against cross-border terrorism, particularly highlighting Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership in handling security challenges.

Reflecting on past experiences, Jaishankar drew attention to how India's stance on cross-border terrorism before PM Modi's era, and underscored a notable shift since the Mumbai attacks in 2008, stating, "That era is now behind us. Since the Mumbai attacks on 26/11, we haven't witnessed any major terrorist incidents in our country. In today's India, be it any terrorist incident, Uri is our reply."

Jaishankar emphasised the criticality of security in border regions, acknowledging its paramount importance to every citizen.

"Security is a significant concern in these border districts, and it holds immense importance in the minds of every citizen," he said while addressing a press conference in Bikaner.

Highlighting the challenges faced on the northern borders, Jaishankar praised the dedication and resilience of India's armed forces. "Even in the northern borders, despite facing various hardships such as extreme weather conditions and pandemics, our forces stand firm, ready to confront any adversity," he asserted.

Jaishankar emphasised the transformative impact of PM Modi's leadership, drawing a clear distinction between the governance of the past and the present. "The difference lies in Modi ji. Earlier, PM Modi wasn't there, now PM Modi is here. That's why there's been a difference in the last 10 years," he explained.

Drawing from his extensive experience in government roles, Jaishankar highlighted the importance of strong leadership and clarity in decision-making. "When the system perceives strong leadership, there's clarity in directives, making it easier for us to articulate our stance and act decisively," he noted.

"It's easier for us to state our case, and even if we need to take some action, there's no doubt for us. We know that we have 100 per cent backing, and we don't hesitate to act," the EAM also said.

"I've been in government for 47 years, so I've seen many Prime Ministers; I've seen many administrations. But I can tell you that in the last 10 years, when I talk about foreign policy, if you go to other ministries, delve into different issues, look at governance, you'll see that when there's good governance, when there's leadership, when there's commitment, when there's a connection with the public, you see these results," Jaishankar added.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed

Comments

Continue Reading

Pakistan Says It Will Resolutely Safeguard Its Sovereignty; Criticises Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's Statement

"History attests to Pakistan's firm resolve and ability to protect and defend itself," the Foreign Office said in a statement while criticising India's ruling dispensation for resorting to hateful rhetoric for electoral gains. For long, Pakistan's establishment has been criticised for its practice of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings by international bodies

NEW DELHI: Pakistan on Saturday said it stands resolute in its intent and ability to safeguard its sovereignty, a day after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh made it clear that India will enter Pakistan if terrorists run away to the neighbouring nation after carrying out terror strikes in the country.

“Pakistan denounces the provocative marks made by India’s defence minister Rajnath Singh during a recent televised interview. On January 25th 2024 Pakistan had talked about extrajudicial killings by India,” according to a statement released by Pakistan's Foreign Office on Saturday.

Pakistan also said that they stood resolute in in their intent and ability to safeguard their sovereignty against any aggression.

Rajnath Singh had made the statement following a query on a story that appeared in the UK daily 'The Guardian' that wrote that the Indian government had killed 20 people in Pakistan since 2020 as a part of a broader plan to target “terrorists residing on foreign soil.

During a televised interview on Friday Singh said, “If any terrorist tries to disturb the country’s peace, we will give a befitting reply. If the terrorists run back to Pakistan ‘toh Pakistan main this ke maarenge’ (we will go there and kill them).”

Singh also reaffirmed that India had never attacked any country or tried to capture their territory. BUt if anyone threatens India or its peace, they will not be spared.

India hasn’t issued any official response yet on the Pakistan Foreign Office’s statement made on Saturday.

Meanwhile, it may be recalled that Pakistan had on 25th January this year accused India of killing two designated terrorists on their soil. India had categorically rejected these claims.

“The world knows, Pakistan has long been the epicentre of terrorism, organised crime and illegal transnational activities. India and many other countries have publicly warned Pakistan cautioning that it would be consumed by its own culture of terror and violence," said Randhir Jaiswal, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson on January 25th.

The two men Pakistan had then referred to were Shahid Latif, a designated terrorist who was the mastermind of the 2016 attack on Indian Air Force base in Pathankot, and Muhammad Riaz of the Lashkar-e-Taiba who was responsible for a terrorist attack in Rajouri in 2023, leaving seven dead, and injuring 13.

(With Inputs From Agencies)

Comments

Continue Reading

Pak Media: Pakistan Denounces 'Provocative' Remarks By Indian Defence Minister Over Assassination Campaign: Pak Foreign Office

In response to Union Defense Minister Rajnath Singh’s remarks on terrorism where he said that “If they [terrorists] run away to Pakistan, we will enter Pakistan to kill them (Pakistan mein ghus ke marenge),” Pakistan on April 6 said that the Indian government “habitually resorts to hateful rhetoric to fuel hyper-nationalistic sentiments, unapologetically exploiting such discourse for electoral gains.”

In an interview to a television channel Mr. Singh responded to a question on an article published in The Guardian that said India had carried out the execution of almost 20 terrorists since 2020 inside Pakistan. “If any terrorist tries to disturb the peace in Bharat, or tries to carry out terror activities in Bharat, we will give them a befitting reply (muh tod jawab),” he said.

Denouncing his remarks, Pakistan brought up their claims of “India’s campaign of extrajudicial and transnational assassinations on Pakistani soil” citing evidence they had provided in January this year.

“India’s assertion of its preparedness to extra-judicially execute more civilians, arbitrarily pronounced as “terrorists”, inside Pakistan constitutes a clear admission of culpability. It is imperative for the international community to hold India accountable for its heinous and illegal actions,” Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry said in a press release.

“India’s ruling dispensation habitually resorts to hateful rhetoric to fuel hyper-nationalistic sentiments, unapologetically exploiting such discourse for electoral gains,” it added.

In January, in response to Pakistan Foreign Secretary Muhammad Syrus Sajjad Qazi’s claims that India had carried out two extra-judicial killings, MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal had termed it Pakistan’s “latest attempt at peddling false and malicious anti-India propaganda.” Stating that Pakistan has long been the epicentre of terrorism, organised crime, and illegal transnational activities, the spokesperson added that to “blame others for its own misdeeds can neither be a justification nor a solution.”

The Ministry of External Affairs has declined to comment on whether Mr. Singh’s statement was at odds with the MEA position, as quoted in the article, that the allegations were false.

(With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

India Will Enter Pak To Kill Terrorists Who Flee There: Defence Minister

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's comments come a day after Britain's Guardian newspaper published a report alleging the Indian government killed 20 people in Pakistan since 2020 as part of a broader plan to eliminate terrorists living on foreign soil. India will enter Pakistan to kill anyone who escapes after trying a terror attack, Rajnath Singh said

New Delhi: India will enter Pakistan to kill anyone who escapes over the border after trying to carry out terrorist activities in the country, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh told CNN News18 on Friday.

Mr Singh's comments come a day after Britain's Guardian newspaper published a report alleging the Indian government killed 20 people in Pakistan since 2020 as part of a broader plan to eliminate terrorists living on foreign soil.

The foreign ministry did not respond to a Reuters' request for comment on the report, while Pakistan's foreign ministry refused to comment.

"If they run away to Pakistan, we will enter Pakistan to kill them," Mr Singh told the channel in response to a question about the report.

"India always wants to maintain good relations with its neighbouring countries... But if anyone shows India the angry eyes again and again, comes to India and tries to promote terrorist activities, we will not spare them," Mr Singh said.

Relations between the countries have worsened since a 2019 suicide bombing of a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) convoy in Jammu and Kashmir's Pulwama was traced to Pakistan-based terrorists, leading India to carry out an airstrike on a terrorist base in Pakistan.

Pakistan said earlier this year it had credible evidence linking Indian agents to the killing of two of its citizens on its soil.

India said it was "false and malicious" propaganda.

The report in the Guardian comes months after Canada and the US accused India of killing or attempting to kill Khalistani terrorists in those countries.

Canada said in September that it was pursuing "credible allegations" linking India to the death of a Sikh separatist leader shot dead in June - claims that India said were "absurd and motivated".

A top Canadian official said in January that India was cooperating in the matter and bilateral ties were improving.

The US similarly said in November that it had thwarted an Indian plot to kill a Sikh separatist leader and announced charges against a person it said had worked with India to orchestrate the attempted murder.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said India will investigate any information it receives on the matter.

(With Agency Inputs)

Comments

Continue Reading

'Uri And Balakot Sent Their Own Message': Jaishankar On India's Response To Cross-Border Terrorism

New Delhi: Calling the national security a complicated calculus in today's times, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar highlighted India's response to Chinese incursions at the Line of Actual control (LAC) and towards cross-border terrorism from Pakistan through its ferocious responses in Uri and Balakot.

India carried out a surgical strike against terror units in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in 2016 in response to an attack at an army base in Uri, Kashmir. In 2019, after the Pulwama attack -- which killed over 40 Indian soldiers -- the Indian Air Force carried out an airstrike against Pakistani terror camps in Balakot.

The EAM was giving the Pandit Hriday Nath Kunzru Memorial Lectures 2024 at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Convention Centre, on the topic of 'Bharat and the World'.

Addressing the event on Monday, Jaishankar said, "The calculus of national security has become much more complicated. Traditional methods of competing and pressuring are buttressed by new tools of influence and disruption. Here too, Bharat has pushed back with determination and fortitude."

He said that India has worked on developing border infrastructure, one of the aspect which the EAM said was "long neglected." He added that India's response to the cross-border terrorism were seen in the episodes of Uri and Balakot.

"When we were challenged on the LAC, with China, In the midst of COVID rapid and effective counter deployments were the appropriate answer. Seeking to rectify the long neglected of the border infrastructure. We have made the defence of the nation much more effective," Jaishankar said.

He added, "On the largest stage when it came to the Indo-Pacific. We held firmly to our decision to establish and take forward the Quad. On the Western Front, the long standing challenge of cross-border terrorism now elicits more befitting responses. Believe me, Uri and Balakot sent their own message."

Further, the EAM said that while 'Bharat' won't shy away from answering questions, it also has the courage to question the questioners.

"Economically, Bharat's answer is in greater Atmanirbharta. Politically, a more authentic and rooted representation that will contest the propaganda which will favour the compliant and discredit it. Bharat will never shy away from questions, but equally, Bharat has the courage to question the questioners," he said.

Jaishankar also highlighted how India stood with its stand of procuring cheaper oil from Russia for its domestic interests countering Western pressure.

"The world now looks more volatile and uncertain, demanding independent and confident thinking from us. We have seen that already when it came to our energy procurement choices. Bharat chose the interest of its domestic consumers while resisting international pressure," he further said.

This report is auto-generated from a syndicated feed

Comments

Continue Reading

'India Would Have Escalated Situation If Abhinandan Wasn't Released': Says Ex-Indian Envoy To Pak

WION's diplomatic correspondent Sidhant Sibal (right) with Ajay Bisaria

Ajay Bisaria, the former Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, has underscored the gravity of the February 2019 developments when it comes to India-Pakistan ties, stating, "There was a distinct probability that India would escalate the situation if Pakistan had not returned the captured Indian pilot or if he had come to harm. That was certainly a point which was clearly made by India."

Following the Pulwama terror attack in 2019, India conducted surgical strikes on Jaish-e-Mohammed terror camps near Balakot, leading to a dogfight between Indian and Pakistani air forces and the subsequent capture and later release of Indian IAF Pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthamanam by Pakistan.

Speaking to our diplomatic correspondent Sidhant Sibal, Bisaria further offered insights into the suggested path for Pakistan's interests, stating, "Pakistan's best bet for its own interest is to try to normalize the country." He has revealed several details of his tenure in Pakistan and ties between the two countries in his book "Anger Management". His book also gives account of Imran Khan's tenure and his view on India ties.

Here's the full interview:

Sidhant Sibal: Your tenure in Pakistan, India removing special status for J&K, if you can talk about that?

Ajay Bisaria: Well, I think that was perhaps the most interesting part of my tenure, that is my exit from Pakistan because it came somewhat abruptly. I had done just about 20 months at that point in Pakistan, and with India's decisions on Article 370 and the decisions by our parliament, I was asked to leave, so I had a 72 hour notice period, and on the fifth of August I was called in by the Pakistani foreign secretary for a demarche about what India had done, and expressing a great deal of concern. And of course, my response was that this was internal to India, Pakistan had no local standi in this situation. But after a point of time, Pakistan seemed to be running out of options on what it could do to express its anger about what India had done. And therefore, the position it took was to ask the Indian High Commissioner to leave and I therefore left Pakistan somewhat abruptly in three days.

Sidhant Sibal: Pulwama in February 2019, how close India, Pakistan were at war or something that was very dangerous for the region?

Ajay Bisaria: I wouldn't say war, but we will certainly be at a stage where the crisis could have escalated beyond what it went. Fortunately it de-escalated and we did not have any ugly situation at that point of time, but there was a distinct probability that India would escalate the situation if Pakistan had not returned the captured Indian pilot or if he had come to harm. That was certainly a point which was clearly made by India.

Sidhant Sibal: So since 2014, India has had a consistent policy towards Pakistan, one that links cross border terrorism. Do you think that this policy is the policy that should be or there should be some opening when it comes to talks as well?

Ajay Bisaria: I think India is always open for peace and for talks and so was the case even after 2014. Because you need to remember that 2014 and 15, Prime Minister Modi met Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif five times, the first time being even at the inauguration, the swearing in of Prime Minister Modi when Nawaz Sharif came and multiple meetings in the middle until Prime Minister Modi himself went to Pakistan in the end of 2015. So the deal breaker, which prevented this diplomacy from flowering, we had agreed at that point to have resumed dialogue, we were calling it a comprehensive dialogue, was terrorism. And I think that is the lesson that at least Pakistan must draw is that we come close to agreement to take forward matters, to do constructive diplomacy. India's leaders always take that initiative. But terrorism is a deal breaker. And you know it was exactly what happened. That 2016 was a terrible year in terms of terrorism, and that's why this relationship got frozen.

Sidhant Sibal: I can ask you to crystal-gaze when it comes to the India- Pakistan relationship. Do you think that there will be a time when there will be a normalization of the relationship?

Ajay Bisaria: I think I would look at it with cautious optimism. And if I was advising the Government of Pakistan or the Government of India, right now, I'm advising neither. I would say that Pakistan's best bet for its own interest is to try to normalize the country. And what would normalize mean , normalized would mean to reduce the hold of its army in the economy, to normalize the economy with economic reform, because that is the biggest danger to Pakistan, that it might just crumble as a state. It should normalize in the sense of not using terrorism as a weapon of state policy because this is what has made Pakistan's international reputation terrible and has many economic implications for it. So I think India will be happy to engage with a normalizing Pakistan and on India's side, India needs the strategic patience and the calibration to be able to deal with Pakistan's terrorism with force, but also have the flexibility to engage and understand Pakistan, particularly when it becomes hopefully more coherent as a policy unit, after the Pakistan elections.

Sidhant Sibal: So my final question to you is any anecdote you would like to share with our viewers, something that is a story that touched you and moved you in Pakistan?

Ajay Bisaria: Well, there are multiple stories and many of them find mentioned in my book, and these are not just my stories, but those of many of my predecessors and I think what is very heart warming in Pakistan is that despite the hostility, it can melt away in the evening over music and over, so I hosted at my residence in Pakistan several times, several evenings of music. And when our people, cultural artists from India didn't get permission, I would invite some singers from Lahore who were as good and as familiar with the same music as the songs of Lata Mangeshkar or Kishore Kumar and they would sing them. So I think that's what gives us hope in this relationship, that there is a lot of latent goodwill, also in the relationship apart from the ill.

Comments

Continue Reading

'Pakistan Spooked By Coercive Diplomacy' Former Diplomat Ajay Bisaria Reveals Why Pakistan Feared 'Qatal Ki Raat' Post Balakot

New Delhi: Former Diplomat Ajay Bisaria has talked about coercive diplomacy that took place after the Balakot strikes that resulted in Pakistan repatriating Wing Commander Abhinanadan whose flight had crash landed in Pakistan territory.

In an interview, Bisaria stated that Pakistan had a credible threat regarding India using missiles and it was amplified to them directly or through diplomats of other nations. He noted that then-Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan attempted to call PM Narendra Modi as the threat of force was very "credible to return the pilot" in order not to escalate the situation.

In his latest book, 'Anger Management: The Troubled Diplomatic Relationship between India and Pakistan, former Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan Ajay Bisaria claims that Pakistan had credible information on nine missiles India had prepared to launch into Pakistani territory. He has mentioned receiving a call from Pakistan's High Commissioner to Sohail Mahmood, who said that Imran Khan was keen to speak to PM Modi.

Asked about being contacted by Sohail Mahmood and Pakistan suspecting that India would launch a missile strike, he stated, "After Pulwama, India had taken action in Balakot and that was followed by Pakistan's operation which it called Swift retort in India and as a result of which an Indian pilot Abhinandan was captured, he fell in Pakistan and he was captured."

"So what I tried to do is present an account of the coercive diplomacy that took place after that, to get the pilot back and there was a very credible threat of force of the use of nine missiles and I've given an account of how that played out in Pakistan that Pakistan had this credible threat which was amplified to them through various means directly and also through other diplomats of other countries and as a result a of which Pakistan made the choice of returning the pilot, not wanting to escalate that conflict and being assured that if the pilot was not returned, there would be huge consequences and as a result of that, in trying to de-escalate the situation, the Prime Minister of Pakistan attempted to call the Prime Minister of India and the point also here is that the Prime Minister of Pakistan was then felt obliged to take a decision because the threat of force was very credible to return the pilot in order not to escalate the situation," he added.

On PM Modi's "Qatal Ki Raat" reference and the then Pakistan PM Imran Khan's attempt to make a phone call to PM Modi, Ajay Bisaria said "PM Modi did mention this in his speech. He did refer to this episode but Imran Khan also referred to this episode in his own speech in Parliament, that he had made an attempt to talk to the Indian PM. There was a conversation in Pakistan's parliament also, which has been reported by a Pakistan MP. He mentioned that both, then Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi and then Army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa came to brief the MPs and said there is a serious danger of the crisis escalating and India taking hard action and therefore, we should return the pilot..."

Further asked whether India was close to taking action, he said, "You know the thing about coercive diplomacy is that the threat of force should be credible which means that not just the adversary but you should believe yourself that you are going to use it now, whether or not it would have been used is a question that can be debated. But the point is that the use of force to get an outcome was successfully done."

Ajay Bisaria said he was in India right after the Pulwama attack. The former diplomat said he was part of the team in India that was monitoring the situation and dealing with it.

Asked about PM Modi's message to him, he stated, "Well, I was at that point in India right after the Pubama attack. I came to India so I was part of the team in India which was monitoring the situation and dealing with it. So the message I think that was going to Pakistan at that point was very clear that India was going to escalate the situation in case the pilot was not returned."

He said India was confident that the pilot would be returned as the consequences would have been serious and the message was sent loud and clear to Pakistan.

"We were confident that the pilot would be returned because the consequences would have been serious and this was a message that went loud and clear to Pakistan's system and Pakistan then reacted. So we were fairly sure that the pilot would be returned unharmed," he added.

Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthamanam, the IAF pilot was captured after his plane went down in Pakistani territory. These events unfolded a day after the Balakot airstrikes conducted by the Indian Air Force on terror hideouts in Pakistan on February 26, 2019. The strikes were in retaliation for a terrorist attack on Indian forces in Jammu and Kashmir's Pulwama on February 14, 2019.

Comments

Continue Reading