0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views1 page

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412 Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York in all respects regarding a case between Edward Serzysko and The Chase Manhattan Bank. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion published at 290 F. Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) that fully addressed the issues in the case.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views1 page

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412 Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York in all respects regarding a case between Edward Serzysko and The Chase Manhattan Bank. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion published at 290 F. Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) that fully addressed the issues in the case.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

409 F.

2d 1360

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,412


Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee,
v.
The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-RespondentAppellant.
Nos. 531, 532, Dockets 33096, 33097.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.


Argued April 22, 1969.
Decided May 20, 1969.

Arthur C. Fink, New York City (Fink, Weinberger & Levin, New York
City, and Walter Talmont, Hempstead, N.Y., on the brief), for plaintiffappellant-appellee.
A. Donald MacKinnon, New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy and Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for
defendant-respondent-appellant.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and
WYATT, District Judge.1
PER CURIAM:

We affirm in all respects the judgment of the District Court for the Southern
District of New York for the reason stated in the thorough and well reasoned
opinion of Judge Graven reported at 290 F.Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1968).

Sitting by designation

You might also like