0% found this document useful (0 votes)
202 views13 pages

Angle of Wall Friction Analysis

The document appears to be engineering calculations for a retaining wall project. It includes details of the wall geometry, soil properties, and calculations of forces, moments, and bearing pressures on the wall. The key results are that the total vertical force on the wall is 311.9 kN/m, the total moment is 576.7 kNm/m, and the calculated bearing pressures at the toe and heel of the wall foundation are 88.7 kN/m2 and 75.5 kN/m2, respectively.

Uploaded by

Ronaldo Hertez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
202 views13 pages

Angle of Wall Friction Analysis

The document appears to be engineering calculations for a retaining wall project. It includes details of the wall geometry, soil properties, and calculations of forces, moments, and bearing pressures on the wall. The key results are that the total vertical force on the wall is 311.9 kN/m, the total moment is 576.7 kNm/m, and the calculated bearing pressures at the toe and heel of the wall foundation are 88.7 kN/m2 and 75.5 kN/m2, respectively.

Uploaded by

Ronaldo Hertez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

1
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

2
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014

1000300 2400
3700 132 kN/m2
5.3 kN/m
4200

4550
200
500
350

2
44.4 kN/m
2 2
88.7 kN/m 75.5 kN/m

3800
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

3
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

4
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

5
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

6
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

7
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

8
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

9
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

10
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014

40 50
12 [Link]
horizontal @ 200 c/c
parallel to face of stem

10 dia.bars20
@[Link]
300 c/c @ 175 c/c
20 [Link] @
50 200 c/c
150
75 200 c/c
16 [Link] @
10 [Link]
transverse @ 200 c/c
in base
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

11
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014

RETAINING WALL CALCULATIONSRetaining wall analysis in accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum
dated February 2009 and the UK National Annex incorporating Corrigendum No.1Tedds calculation version 2.4.09Library
item: Analysis calculation titleRetaining wall detailsStem type; Cantilever with inclined front faceStem height; h
stem = 4200 mmStem thickness; tstem = 300 mmSlope length to front of stem;lslf = 100 mmAngle to rear face of
stem;  = 90 degAngle to front face of stem; f = 88.6 degStem density; stem = 24 kN/m3Toe
length; ltoe = 1000 mmHeel length; lheel = 2400 mmBase thickness; tbase = 350 mmBase density; 
base = 24 kN/m3Height of retained soil; hret = 3700 mmAngle of soil surface;  = 0 degDepth of cover; dcover =
500 mmLibrary item: Soil details outputDepth of excavation; dexc = 200 mmRetained soil propertiesSoil type; M
edium dense well graded sandMoist density; mr = 21 kN/m3Saturated density; sr = 23 kN/m3Characteristic
effective shear resistance angle; 'r.k = 30 degCharacteristic wall friction angle; r.k = 0 degBase soil
propertiesSoil type; Medium dense well graded sandMoist density; mb = 18 kN/m3Characteristic effective shear
resistance angle; 'b.k = 30 degCharacteristic wall friction angle; b.k = 15 degCharacteristic base friction
angle; bb.k = 30 degPresumed bearing capacity; Pbearing = 150 kN/m2Loading detailsVariable surcharge load; S
urchargeQ = 10 kN/m2 Calculate retaining wall geometryBase length; lbase = ltoe + lslf + tstem + lheel = 3800
mmMoist soil height; hmoist = hsoil = 4200 mmLength of surcharge load; lsur = lheel = 2400 mm - Distance to vertical
component; xsur_v = lbase - lheel / 2 = 2600 mmEffective height of wall; heff = hbase + dcover + hret = 4550 mm -
Distance to horizontal component; xsur_h = heff / 2 = 2275 mmArea of wall stem; Astem = hstem  (tstem +
lslf / 2) = 1.47 m2 - Distance to vertical component; xstem = (hstem  tstem  (ltoe + lslf + tstem / 2) + hstem  lslf /
2  (ltoe + 2  lslf / 3)) / Astem = 1224 mmArea of wall base; Abase = lbase  tbase = 1.33 m2 - Distance to vertical
component; xbase = lbase / 2 = 1900 mmArea of moist soil; Amoist = hmoist  lheel = 10.08 m2 - Distance to
vertical component; xmoist_v = lbase - (hmoist  lheel2 / 2) / Amoist = 2600 mm - Distance to horizontal component; x
moist_h = heff / 3 = 1517 mmArea of base soil; Apass = dcover  (ltoe + lslf  dcover / (2  hstem)) = 0.503 m2 -
Distance to vertical component;xpass_v = lbase - (dcover  ltoe  (lbase - ltoe / 2) + lslf  dcover2 / (2  hstem)  (lbase -
ltoe - lslf  dcover / (3  hstem))) / Apass = 503 mm - Distance to horizontal component; xpass_h = (dcover +
hbase) / 3 = 283 mmArea of excavated base soil; Aexc = hpass  (ltoe + lslf  hpass / (2  hstem)) = 0.301 m2 - Distance
to vertical component; xexc_v = lbase - (hpass  ltoe  (lbase - ltoe / 2) + lslf  hpass2 / (2  hstem)  (lbase - ltoe - lslf 
hpass / (3  hstem))) / Aexc = 502 mm - Distance to horizontal component; xexc_h = (hpass + hbase) / 3 = 217 mmUsing
Coulomb theoryActive pressure coefficient; KA = sin( + 'r.k)2 / (sin()2  sin( - r.k)  [1 + [sin('r.k + r.k) 
sin('r.k - ) / (sin( - r.k)  sin( + ))]]2) = 0.333Passive pressure coefficient; KP = sin(f - 'b.k)2 / (sin(f)2 
sin(f + b.k)  [1 - [sin('b.k + b.k)  sin('b.k) / (sin(f + b.k)  sin(f))]]2) = 4.769Library item: Calculated soil
props outputBearing pressure checkVertical forces on wallWall stem; Fstem = Astem  stem = 35.3 kN/mWall
base; Fbase = Abase  base = 31.9 kN/mSurcharge load; Fsur_v = SurchargeQ  lheel = 24 kN/mMoist retained
soil; Fmoist_v = Amoist  mr = 211.7 kN/mBase soil; Fpass_v = Apass  mb = 9.1 kN/mTotal; Ftotal_v = Fstem +
Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fpass_v + Fsur_v = 311.9 kN/mHorizontal forces on wallSurcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  SurchargeQ
 heff = 15.2 kN/mMoist retained soil; Fmoist_h = KA  mr  heff2 / 2 = 72.5 kN/mTotal; Ftotal_h = max(Fmoist_h +
Fsur_h - Ftotal_v  tan(bb.d), 0 kN/m) = 0 kN/mMoments on wallWall stem; Mstem = Fstem  xstem = 43.2
kNm/mWall base; Mbase = Fbase  xbase = 60.6 kNm/mSurcharge load; Msur = Fsur_v  xsur_v - Fsur_h 
xsur_h = 27.9 kNm/mMoist retained soil; Mmoist = Fmoist_v  xmoist_v - Fmoist_h  xmoist_h = 440.5 kNm/mBase soil; M
pass = Fpass_v  xpass_v = 4.6 kNm/mTotal; Mtotal = Mstem + Mbase + Mmoist + Mpass + Msur = 576.7
kNm/mCheck bearing pressureDistance to reaction; x = Mtotal / Ftotal_v = 1849 mmEccentricity of reaction; e
= x - lbase / 2 = -51 mmLoaded length of base; lload = lbase = 3800 mmBearing pressure at toe; qtoe = Ftotal_v /
lbase  (1 - 6  e / lbase) = 88.7 kN/m2Bearing pressure at heel; qheel = Ftotal_v / lbase  (1 + 6  e / lbase) = 75.5
kN/m2Library item: Bearing pressure common outputFactor of safety; FoSbp = Pbearing / max(qtoe, qheel) =
1.691PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressureLibrary item: Bearing FoS
outputPartial factors on actions - Table A.3 - Combination 1Permanent unfavourable action; G = 1.35Permanent
favourable action; Gf = 1.00Variable unfavourable action; Q = 1.50Variable favourable action; Qf =
0.00Library item; Load combination outputPartial factors for soil parameters – Table A.4 - Combination 1Angle of shearing
resistance; ' = 1.00Effective cohesion; c' = 1.00Weight density;  = 1.00Library item; Partial factors
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

12
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014

outputRetained soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle; 'r.d = atan(tan('r.k) / ') = 30 degDesign
wall friction angle; r.d = atan(tan(r.k) / ') = 0 degBase soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle; 
'b.d = atan(tan('b.k) / ') = 30 degDesign wall friction angle; b.d = atan(tan(b.k) / ') = 15 degDesign base
friction angle;bb.d = atan(tan(bb.k) / ') = 30 degLibrary item; Design shear resistance outputDesign effective
cohesion; c'b.d = c'b.k / c' = 0 kN/m2Using Coulomb theoryActive pressure coefficient; KA = sin( + 'r.d)2 /
(sin()2  sin( - r.d)  [1 + [sin('r.d + r.d)  sin('r.d - ) / (sin( - r.d)  sin( + ))]]2) = 0.333Passive pressure
coefficient; KP = sin(f - 'b.d)2 / (sin(f)2  sin(f + b.d)  [1 - [sin('b.d + b.d)  sin('b.d) / (sin(f + b.d) 
sin(f))]]2) = 4.769Library item: Calculated soil props outputSliding checkVertical forces on wallWall stem; Fstem =
Gf  Astem  stem = 35.3 kN/mWall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase  base = 31.9 kN/mMoist retained soil; F
moist_v = Gf  Amoist  mr = 211.7 kN/mBase soil; Fexc_v = Gf  Aexc  mb = 5.4 kN/mTotal; Ftotal_v =
Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 284.3 kN/mHorizontal forces on wallSurcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  Q 
SurchargeQ  heff = 22.7 kN/mMoist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr  heff2 / 2 = 97.8 kN/mTotal; F
total_h = Fmoist_h + Fsur_h = 120.6 kN/mCheck stability against slidingBase soil resistance; Fexc_h = Gf  KP 
cos(b.d)  mb  (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = 17.5 kN/mBase friction; Ffriction = Ftotal_v  tan(bb.d) = 164.1
kN/mResistance to sliding; Frest = Fexc_h + Ffriction = 181.7 kN/mFactor of safety; FoSsl = Frest / Ftotal_h =
1.507PASS - Resistance to sliding is greater than sliding forceLibrary item: Sliding check outputOverturning checkVertical
forces on wallWall stem; Fstem = Gf  Astem  stem = 35.3 kN/mWall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase 
base = 31.9 kN/mMoist retained soil; Fmoist_v = Gf  Amoist  mr = 211.7 kN/mBase soil; Fexc_v = Gf 
Aexc  mb = 5.4 kN/mTotal; Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 284.3 kN/mHorizontal forces on
wallSurcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  Q  SurchargeQ  heff = 22.7 kN/mMoist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G 
KA  mr  heff2 / 2 = 97.8 kN/mBase soil; Fexc_h = -Gf  KP  cos(b.d)  mb  (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = -17.5
kN/mTotal; Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fexc_h + Fsur_h = 103.1 kN/mOverturning moments on wallSurcharge load; Msur_OT
= Fsur_h  xsur_h = 51.8 kNm/mMoist retained soil; Mmoist_OT = Fmoist_h  xmoist_h = 148.4 kNm/mTotal; M
total_OT = Mmoist_OT + Msur_OT = 200.1 kNm/mRestoring moments on wallWall stem; Mstem_R = Fstem  xstem
= 43.2 kNm/mWall base; Mbase_R = Fbase  xbase = 60.6 kNm/mMoist retained soil; Mmoist_R = Fmoist_v 
xmoist_v = 550.4 kNm/mBase soil; Mexc_R = Fexc_v  xexc_v - Fexc_h  xexc_h = 6.5 kNm/mTotal; Mtotal_R
= Mstem_R + Mbase_R + Mmoist_R + Mexc_R = 660.7 kNm/mCheck stability against overturningFactor of safety; F
oSot = Mtotal_R / Mtotal_OT = 3.302PASS - Maximum restoring moment is greater than overturning momentLibrary item:
Overturning check outputPartial factors on actions - Table A.3 - Combination 2Permanent unfavourable action; G =
1.00Permanent favourable action; Gf = 1.00Variable unfavourable action; Q = 1.30Variable favourable action;
Qf = 0.00Library item; Load combination outputPartial factors for soil parameters – Table A.4 - Combination 2Angle of
shearing resistance; ' = 1.25Effective cohesion; c' = 1.25Weight density;  = 1.00Library item; Partial factors
outputRetained soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle; 'r.d = atan(tan('r.k) / ') = 24.8 degDesign
wall friction angle; r.d = atan(tan(r.k) / ') = 0 degBase soil propertiesDesign effective shear resistance angle; 
'b.d = atan(tan('b.k) / ') = 24.8 degDesign wall friction angle; b.d = atan(tan(b.k) / ') = 12.1 degDesign base
friction angle;bb.d = atan(tan(bb.k) / ') = 24.8 degLibrary item; Design shear resistance outputDesign effective
cohesion; c'b.d = c'b.k / c' = 0 kN/m2Using Coulomb theoryActive pressure coefficient; KA = sin( + 'r.d)2 /
(sin()2  sin( - r.d)  [1 + [sin('r.d + r.d)  sin('r.d - ) / (sin( - r.d)  sin( + ))]]2) = 0.409Passive pressure
coefficient; KP = sin(f - 'b.d)2 / (sin(f)2  sin(f + b.d)  [1 - [sin('b.d + b.d)  sin('b.d) / (sin(f + b.d) 
sin(f))]]2) = 3.365Library item: Calculated soil props outputSliding checkVertical forces on wallWall stem; Fstem =
Gf  Astem  stem = 35.3 kN/mWall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase  base = 31.9 kN/mMoist retained soil; F
moist_v = Gf  Amoist  mr = 211.7 kN/mBase soil; Fexc_v = Gf  Aexc  mb = 5.4 kN/mTotal; Ftotal_v =
Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 284.3 kN/mHorizontal forces on wallSurcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  Q 
SurchargeQ  heff = 24.2 kN/mMoist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr  heff2 / 2 = 88.9 kN/mTotal; F
total_h = Fmoist_h + Fsur_h = 113.1 kN/mCheck stability against slidingBase soil resistance; Fexc_h = Gf  KP 
cos(b.d)  mb  (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = 12.5 kN/mBase friction; Ffriction = Ftotal_v  tan(bb.d) = 131.3
kN/mResistance to sliding; Frest = Fexc_h + Ffriction = 143.8 kN/mFactor of safety; FoSsl = Frest / Ftotal_h =
1.271PASS - Resistance to sliding is greater than sliding forceLibrary item: Sliding check outputOverturning checkVertical
forces on wallWall stem; Fstem = Gf  Astem  stem = 35.3 kN/mWall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase 
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.

13
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date

S 10/8/2014

You might also like