0% found this document useful (0 votes)
404 views2 pages

Student Interview Rubric

This document provides a rubric for evaluating student interviews for a job position. It outlines 10 criteria for evaluation including appearance, greeting, communication, body language, posture, politeness, attitude, response to questions, integrity, and overall demonstration of interview skills. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 8, with descriptors provided for performance at each score level. The maximum possible total score is 80 points. Evaluators are to use this rubric to score interviewed students on their performance based on the 10 criteria.

Uploaded by

Kent
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
404 views2 pages

Student Interview Rubric

This document provides a rubric for evaluating student interviews for a job position. It outlines 10 criteria for evaluation including appearance, greeting, communication, body language, posture, politeness, attitude, response to questions, integrity, and overall demonstration of interview skills. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 1 to 8, with descriptors provided for performance at each score level. The maximum possible total score is 80 points. Evaluators are to use this rubric to score interviewed students on their performance based on the 10 criteria.

Uploaded by

Kent
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Job Interview Rubric: Provides a comprehensive rubric for evaluating job interviews, including criteria for appearance, greeting, communication, and other relevant factors.
  • Scoring Continuation: Continues the scoring rubric, explaining the point distribution for various criteria in the job interview evaluation.

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VI – Western Visayas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ROXAS CITY
District III Cluster 10
BAGO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Job Interview Rubric

- Each Interview Evaluator will need a score sheet

Student Name: ______________________________________________________ Date: _____________

Criteria 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 Score


Appearance Overall appearance is Appearance is Overall neat Overall appearance is
untidy somewhat untidy appearance very neat
(** This should
relate to the Choice in clothing is Choice in clothing is Choice in clothing is Choice in clothing is
core inappropriate for any job inappropriate (shirt acceptable for the appropriate for any job
concentration interview (torn, unclean, un-tucked, tee-shirt, type of interview interview
area and may wrinkled) too much jewelry, etc.)
be industry Well groomed (i.e. Very well groomed
specific) Poor grooming Grooming attempt is shirt tucked in, (hair, make-up, clothes
evident jewelry blends with pressed, etc.)
clothing, minimal
wrinkles) Overall appearance is
businesslike

Greeting Unacceptable behavior Used typical behavior Acceptable behavior, Professional behavior
and language and language – did well mannered, and language
modify behavior to fit professionalism (handshake, “hello”,”
Unfriendly and not the interview somewhat lacking thank you “, etc.)
courteous
Attempts to be Courteous to all Friendly and courteous
courteous to all in involved in interview to all involved in
interview setting interview

Communication Speaking is unclear – very Speaking is unclear – Speaking is clear with Speaks clearly and
difficult to understand lapses in sentence minimal mistakes in distinctly with no lapse
message of what is being structure and grammar sentence structure in sentence structure
said (i.e. mumbling) and grammar and grammar usage;
Volume is uneven speaks concisely with
Volume is inappropriate (varied) Volume is appropriate correct pronunciation
for interview (i.e. spoke
too loudly, too softly) Volume conveys
business tone

Body Language Fidgeted – (i.e., constant Fidgeted –(i.e., Minimal fidgeting No fidgeting;
movement of hands and movement of hands (i.e., occasionally consistently used
feet); none or very poor and feet frequently); shifting); average use physical gestures, facial
use of physical gestures, minimal use of of physical gestures, expressions and body
facial expressions and physical gestures, facial expressions and movements in a
body movements facial expressions and body movements in a manner which
detracted from the body movements in a manner which enhanced the interview
interview process manner which enhanced the process
enhanced the interview process
interview process

Posture and Eye Does not look at persons Sits up straight; Sits up straight, good Sits up straight,
Contact involved in the interview average posture; posture; establishes excellent posture; looks
process; keeps head establishes eye contact eye contact with relaxed and confident;
down; minimal eye with interviewers interviewers during establishes eye contact
contact; does not have during the interview the interview 80 -90% with interviewers
good posture; slouching 70 -80% of the time of the time during the interview
90-100% of the time
Politeness Several times, the student Student interrupted or Student interrupted Student never
interrupted or hurried the hurried the or hurried the interrupted or hurried
person doing the interviewer 3-5 times interviewer 1-2 times the interviewer and
interviewing; forgot to during the course of during the course of thanked them after the
thank person(s) the interview, thanked the interview, interview
the person after the thanked the person
interview after the interview
General Lack of interest and Somewhat interested Shows basic interest Appropriately
Attitude enthusiasm about the in the interview; shows in the interview; interested and
interview; passive and little enthusiasm shows some enthusiastic about the
indifferent enthusiasm interview process
Responses to Answers with “yes’ or Gives well-constructed Gives well- Gives well-constructed,
Questions “no” and fails to elaborate responses, but sounds constructed confident responses
or explain; talks negatively rehearsed or unsure responses, does not that are genuine
about past employers sound rehearsed,
student somewhat
hesitant or unsure
Candidate Responses are Responses are Responses are Responses are all
Integrity inconsistent or somewhat inconsistent generally consistent consistent
contradictory. No or contradictory
concrete or specific Concrete and specific Concrete and specific
examples used Concrete and specific examples often used examples are used
examples occasionally
Candidate provided no used Candidate provides Candidate provides
verifiable information for verifiable information verifiable information
claims, and/or claims may Candidate provides for most claims for all claims
be exaggerated or even some verifiable
appear manufactured information for claims
Overall Demonstration of poor Demonstrated limited Demonstrated Highly proficient;
Demonstration interview skills with little proficiency; limited average proficiency; appropriately utilized
of Interview confidence displayed demonstration of average interview skills in an
Skills competent interview demonstration of enthusiastic, motivating
skills in a generally competent interview and engaging manner
confident manner skills in a generally
confident manner
Total out of 80 points possible (10 topics x 8 max possible) Total

- ½ point scoring is appropriate for this section (i.e. 7.5, 6.5. 3.5, etc.)

You might also like