MH-60S Procurement and Budget Analysis
MH-60S Procurement and Budget Analysis
Description:
The Helicopter Combat Support (HC) mission of the MH-60S is to maintain forward deployed fleet sustainability through rapid airborne delivery of materials and personnel and to support amphibious
operations through search and rescue coverage. The primary roles of the aircraft are to conduct vertical replenishment (VERTREP), day/night ship-to-ship, ship-to-shore, and shore-to-ship external
transfer of cargo; internal transport of passengers, mail and cargo, vertical onboard delivery (VOD) ; airhead operations, and day/night search and rescue (SAR). Armed Helo and Organic Airborne
Mine Countermeasures (OAMCM) have been added as primary mission areas for the MH-60S, to be completed as block upgrades to the platform. The purpose of the Armed Helo program is to
provide Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR), Anti-Surface Warfare (SUW), and Force Protection (FP). The purpose of the OAMCM program is to ensure integration of five separate sensors into the
MH-60S helicopter. The AMCM mission will provide Carrier Battle Groups (CVBGs) and Amphibious Readiness Groups (ASGs) with an OAMCM capability. The aircraft secondary roles include
torpedo and drone recovery, noncombatant evacuation operations (NEO), SEAL and EOD support.
NOTE: FY2005 Program Funding does not match P-1 due to Database errors.
AIRFRAME/CFE
D. Remarks:
ENGINES
FY 2005 30 582 ARMY May-02 SS-FFP GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, LYNN,MA Mar-05 Mar-05 Yes N/A
FY 05 Advance Procurement for FY 06 ARMY May-02 SS-FFP GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, LYNN,MA Mar-05 Yes N/A
FY 2006 52 597 ARMY May-02 SS-FFP GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, LYNN,MA Mar-06 Mar-06 Yes N/A
FY 06 Advance Procurement for FY 07 ARMY May-02 SS-FFP GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, LYNN,MA Mar-06 Yes N/A
FY 2007 36 610 ARMY May-02 SS-FFP GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, LYNN,MA Mar-07 Mar-07 Yes N/A
FY 07 Advance Procurement for FY 08 ARMY May-02 SS-FFP GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, LYNN,MA Mar-07 Yes N/A
D. Remarks:
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
BUDGET PROCUREMENT HISTORY AND PLANNING EXHIBIT (P-5A) Weapon System A. DATE
Aircraft Procurement, Navy/Combat Aircraft (BA 1) MH-60S Vertical Replenishment (MYP) U1VR
Common Cockpit
FY 2005 15 1,519 NAVAIR Aug-03 SS/MYP Lockheed Martin, Owego, NY Dec-04 Mar-05 Yes N/A
FY 2005 for FY 2006 AP NAVAIR Aug-03 SS/MYP Lockheed Martin, Owego, NY Dec-04 Yes N/A
FY 2006 26 1,518 NAVAIR Aug-03 SS/MYP Lockheed Martin, Owego, NY Jan-06 Mar-06 Yes N/A
FY 2006 for FY 2007 AP NAVAIR Aug-03 SS/MYP Lockheed Martin, Owego, NY Jan-06 Yes N/A
FY 2007 18 1,879 NAVAIR Aug-03 SS/MYP Lockheed Martin, Owego, NY Dec-06 Mar-07 Yes N/A
FY 2007 for FY 2008 AP NAVAIR Aug-03 SS/MYP Lockheed Martin, Owego, NY Dec-06 Yes N/A
D. REMARKS
Airframe 05 N 15 0 15 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0
Airframe 06 N 26 0 26 2 2 2 20
Airframe 06 N 26 6 20 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 0
Airframe 07 N 18 0 18 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 0
DD Form 2445, JUL 87 Previous editions are obsolete P-1 SHOPPING LIST
311 / 244 ITEM NO 10 Exhibit P-21 Production Schedule
Engine 05 N 30 0 30 2 2 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 0
Engines 06 N 52 0 52 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 24
Engines 06 N 52 28 24 4 4 6 4 6 0
Engines 07 N 36 0 36 4 4 2 4 4 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 0
DD Form 2445, JUL 87 Previous editions are obsolete P-1 SHOPPING LIST
311 / 244 ITEM NO 10 Exhibit P-21 Production Schedule
Common Cockpit 05 N 15 0 15 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Common Cockpit 06 N 26 0 26 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12
Common Cockpit 06 N 26 14 12 2 2 3 2 3 0
Common Cockpit 07 N 18 0 18 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 0
DD Form 2445, JUL 87 Previous editions are obsolete P-1 SHOPPING LIST
311 / 244 ITEM NO 10 Exhibit P-21 Production Schedule
This package represents the procurement of 273 UH-60M BLACK HAWK aircraft, 116 MH-60S SEAHAWK and
144 MH-60R aircraft on a five year airframe contract over the period FY07-11. Adding the production of MH-
60R model aircraft to this contract, at a rate of 24-32 per year will further increase the economic benefits of this
multi-year contract. These exhibits are submitted as an update to the PB06 submission, which has been approved
by Congress, to reflect quantity changes within the FYDP. The Navy MH-60S aircraft are essentially the same
configuration as those procured on the FY02-06 joint multiyear contract with the UH-60L BLACK HAWK. The
Army UH-60M aircraft include the UH-60M baseline aircraft and the UH-60M Upgrade aircraft configuration.
All requirements for these aircraft are funded in the FY07 President’s Budget and will be included in the base
contract quantity. In the event of a significant delay in either service’s program, the multiyear contract will
include mechanisms which will allow for the award of a single service multiyear contract, which can be converted
to a multi-service multiyear contract at the Government’s discretion. An update will be provided 30 days prior to
the proposed contract award. The U.S. Army /Navy proposes the UH-60M BLACK HAWK/MH-60S SEAHAWK
and the MH-60R helicopter system (airframe) as a multiyear contract for FY07-11 since it satisfies each of the
elements of the criteria as indicated below:
(1) Based on a comparison of the estimated prices for five single year contracts to the estimated price
for one five year multiyear for the UH-60M airframe over the period FY07-11, there is a cost avoidance of
approximately $236.5 million for multiyear contracting over single year contracting. Based on a comparison of
P-1 Shopping List – Item No. 10
estimated prices for five single year contracts to the estimated price for one five year multiyear for the MH-60S
airframes over the period FY07-11, there is a cost avoidance of approximately $95.5 million for the multiyear
contracting for the MH-60S over single year contracting and there is a cost avoidance of approximately $74.3
million for the multiyear contracting for the MH-60R over single year contracting. The current UH-60M, MH-60S
and MH-60R budgets are based on a follow-on multiyear contract beginning in FY07.
(2) Where possible, alternate sources have been found for parts in order to encourage competition and
reduce costs. Alternate suppliers are interested in providing bids and making significant investments only as a
result of the long-term stability provided by the multiyear. Some components have minimum buy quantities,
which may not be met under single year procurements, driving up unit costs as the total cost is artificially high.
Multiyear procurement quantities will allow the prime contractor and subcontractors at all tiers to exceed
minimum order quantities resulting in reduced costs for these components. Typically suppliers will provide price
discounts to lock in business. Given a five year contract, suppliers will have greater total business and greater
stability. Therefore, they will be capable of finding innovative processes and be able to justify capital investments
necessary to reduce costs. Some of these cost reductions will be passed on to the customer in the form of price
reductions. In addition, to these types of process innovations and capital investments, competition is expected to
be greater based on larger purchase volumes.
(3) Administrative costs are reduced since there is only one proposal, negotiation, and purchase order
instead of a string of five single year procurement actions. These costs are reduced to the prime contractor, since
they have only one contract to negotiate with the government vice five. Prime contractor costs will also be
reduced, as subcontracts at all tiers will only be entered into once. Some suppliers include proposal preparation
and negotiation as a direct charge to the purchase order; in these cases a dollar for dollar reduction will be realized
as a result of the single proposal action. Additional administrative reduction is realized in production planning.
P-1 Shopping List – Item No. 10
Production line administrative processes will only be performed once, rather than five times under single year
procurement, resulting in significant cost avoidance.
(4) The transition to a product development process based on electronic data is complete. Product
data creation for new design is performed exclusively in a 3D CAD environment. Commitment to the constant
improvement of the design technology is continuing under the Lean Digital Product Development project. New
capabilities are being implemented of which many will be released during the new proposed multi year contract.
These activities are part of a multi-million dollar project aimed at increasing engineering productivity by at least
25%, reducing the cost of quality, and enabling design collaboration with suppliers. Once again the business base
created by the multiyear procurement justified the original investment and will be necessary for continued
significant investment in this critical area.
(5) The prime contractor sets the standard for the vendors that support his contract commitments and
as new processes and innovations are implemented at the prime facility, the vendors are encouraged to adopt those
elements that enhance their performance. The stability of long term commitments supported by multiyear
contracts provides the collateral required to support their financial investments.
(6) New training programs for first time subcontractors will be initiated on an as required basis,
especially in the highly skilled trades areas. Existing training programs for Sikorsky and its major subcontractors
will provide the ability to maintain a highly trained staff for a multiyear program, because it will allow a stable
employment base.
(7) Use of Vendor Multiyear Contracts: Subcontractors are receiving purchase orders for the total
quantity authorized for the prime contract.
P-1 Shopping List – Item No. 10
b. Stability of Requirement: The UH-60M BLACK HAWK is one of the core aviation programs and is
approved for procurement by the Army through FY11. The minimum need for the UH-60M BLACK HAWK is
not expected to decrease during the contemplated contract period, as the requirement for over 1800 replacement
aircraft will support a production line well into the 2020s. The Navy initiated its procurement of the MH-60S in
FY99, with a requirement to buy an average of 20 aircraft per year for a total of 271 aircraft. The MH-60S
SEAHAWK aircraft support U.S. Navy Helo Concept of Operations (CONOPS) and are approved for procurement
by the Navy through FY11. The Navy’s total MH-60S requirement is set forth in the Chief of Naval Operations
approved Navy Helo CONOPS plan of 2002 and is a key component in the modernization and recapitalization of
the Naval Helicopter force through 2020. The Navy initiated its new build procurement of MH-60R in FY04, with
a requirement to buy a total of 252 aircraft. The MH-60R aircraft supports U.S. Navy Helo CONOPS and are
approved for procurement by the Navy through FY14. The Navy’s total MH-60R requirement is set forth in the
Chief of Naval Operations approved Navy Helo CONOPS plan dated 24 September 2002 and is a key component
in the modernization and recapitalization of the Naval Helicopter force.
c. Stability of Funding: The funding for the UH-60M, MH-60S and MH-60R programs is stable. The
Army has consistently included funding for the BLACK HAWK in all budget submissions. Congressional action
has provided funds above the President’s Budget for UH-60 aircraft in the current multiyear contract in each of the
last five years. The Navy has consistently provided funding for the MH-60S program. The success of the prior
six multiyear contracts for the UH-60A/L and the prior multiyear contract for MH-60S has provided the
confidence in the programs to obtain full support by all levels of the budget process. The funding for MH-60R
program is consistent with an Independent Cost Estimate which supports the MS III funding decision. MS III
scheduled for 23 January 2006 supports entry into full rate production. The Navy and Congress has consistently
supported and provided funding for the MH-60R program.
d. Stable Configuration: The UH-60 will be in the thirty-first year and the MH-60S will be in the sixth year
of full-rate production in FY07 and will be produced in basically the same configurations that have been utilized
over the prior thirty years and six years respectively. There have been configuration changes during that period to
allow for changing mission requirements or to improve on the producibility or reliability of the system. Similar
configuration changes will be included under this contract, including bringing the UH-60M aircraft to the
upgraded UH-60M configuration. The MH-60R is the cornerstone of the CNO approved Helo CONOPS replacing
the aging SH-60B and SH-6F helicopters. The MH-60R aircraft is a derivative of the SH-60B/F/H platforms. The
MH-60R program is currently in its third year of Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) and will be in the second
year of full-rate production in FY07. The proposed contract will procure three distinct service configurations—
the Army UH-60M, the Navy MH-60S and the Navy MH-60R. Commonality between the three configurations is
substantial.
e. Realistic Cost Estimate: The procurement cost estimate for the UH-60M/MH-60S/MH-60R program is
realistic. The current procurement cost estimate is based on negotiated FY02-06 multiyear prices, UH-60M LRIP
proposal data and UH-60M contract experience (36 months on contract). The third prototype aircraft under this
contract is a new production UH-60M. The MH-60R procurement cost estimate is based on negotiated FY04-05
prices. The contract will be a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract with no unfunded cancellation ceiling.
f. National Security: As a principle element of the Defense Planning Guidance, the Department of the Navy
developed its Transformation Roadmap. The Roadmap describes the key naval concepts, capabilities, initiatives,
processes and programs that will guide the transformation efforts of the Navy. Naval transformation will support
joint transformation by delivering new military capabilities that will greatly expand the sovereign options
available to joint force commanders to project power, assure access, and protect and advance America’s interests
worldwide in the face of emergent threat technologies and strategies. One of these naval concepts is Sea Shield.
P-1 Shopping List – Item No. 10
Sea Shield permits the joint force to operate effectively despite adversary efforts to deny theater access to U.S.
forces. It achieves these goals by exploiting global sea control to defeat area denial threats including aircraft,
missiles, small littoral surface combatants, mines, and submarines. Concepts and capabilities are being developed
to counter the threats from quiet diesel submarines operating near the coast and mines in and beyond the surf zone.
Key components that will provide these capabilities are the MH-60 Seahawk aircraft. Section III of the Defense
Planning Guidance, FY 1999-2003, dated 2 July 1997, states that readiness and sustainability remain the top
priorities of the Department of Defense. A flexible vertical replenishment at-sea capability is vital to these
objectives.
$ in Millions $ in Millions
Army Navy
Inflation $24.6 $8.1
Vendor Procurement $159.6 $68.6
Manufacturing $25.1 $84.8
Other $27.2 $8.3
Total $236.5 $169.8
4. Advantages of the MYP: A Multi-service multiyear contract results in a significant cost avoidance ($406.3M)
over a single year approach, eliminates duplicative project management costs, maintains the capability to produce
additional aircraft to meet the needs of mobilization and FMS sales, and maintains an industrial base necessary to
meet the production requirements of current and future helicopter systems.
Implementation of this proposed MYP will yield a favorable impact on the industrial base. The stability afforded
by the use of a multiyear procurement will allow the prime contractor to enter into long term agreements with
suppliers, at every tier, which provide substantial cost avoidance.
Significant competition at the subcontractor level is expected as a result of the proposed five year FY07-11
airframe multiyear contracting strategy. Competitive bids are expected to be at an annual rate of approximately 45
percent. Every opportunity to encourage dual sourcing at the subcontractor level will be pursued. The first tier
subcontractor plan will be structured to encourage competition at the second tier supplier level, indicating full
utilization of small and disadvantaged businesses. While significant supplier downsizing and consolidation have
occurred due to a general reduction in spending, multiyear contracting will produce acceptable supplier pricing
due to the stable business base.
Production Capacity: Present tooling can produce approximately 17 aircraft per month by the prime contractor.
This capacity is more than adequate to accommodate the FY07-11 airframe multiyear contract requirements.
Annual Procurement
Gross Cost 669.319 858.907 1,262.920 1,182.933 864.923 4,839.002
Less PY Adv Procurement (77.991) (98.312) (154.347) (145.161) (105.969) (581.780)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 591.328 760.595 1,108.573 1,037.772 758.954 4,257.222
Advance Procurement
For FY07 77.991
For FY08 98.312
For FY09 154.347
For FY10 145.161
For FY11 105.969
Plus CY Adv Procurement 77.991 98.312 154.347 145.161 105.969 581.780
Weapon System Cost 77.991 689.640 914.942 1,253.734 1,143.741 758.954 4,839.002
Multiyear Procurement
Gross Cost (P-1) 632.542 813.780 1,206.245 1,129.509 820.386 4,602.462
Less PY Adv Procurement (77.991) (162.786) (192.605) (173.820) (121.881) (729.083)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 554.551 650.994 1,013.640 955.689 698.505 3,873.379
Advance Procurement
For FY07 77.991 77.991
For FY08 162.786 162.786
For FY09 15.109 177.496 192.605
For FY10 5.051 6.017 162.752 173.820
For FY11 2.899 2.960 3.022 113.000 121.881
Plus CY Adv Procurement 77.991 185.845 186.473 165.774 113.000 729.083
Weapon System Cost 77.991 740.396 837.467 1,179.414 1,068.689 698.505 4,602.462
Multiyear Savings($) (50.756) 77.475 74.320 75.052 60.449 236.540
Cancellation Ceiling-Funded
Cancellation Ceiling-Unfunded
Outlays
Annual 14.407 164.550 514.557 822.181 1049.688 1034.733 733.457 299.795 120.012 61.063 24.559 4,839.002
Multiyear 14.407 173.925 524.430 782.599 986.424 968.819 683.262 277.488 111.787 56.718 22.603 4,602.462
Savings (9.375) (9.873) 39.582 63.264 65.914 50.195 22.307 8.225 4.345 1.956 236.540
Remarks:
Annual Procurement
Gross Cost 587.560 578.190 769.510 730.560 780.060 3,445.880
Less PY Adv Procurement (123.830) (88.250) (115.580) (128.480) (131.900) (588.040)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 463.730 489.950 653.930 602.080 648.160 2,857.840
Advance Procurement
For FY07 122.470
For FY08 1.670 86.060
For FY09 115.580
For FY10 128.480
For FY11 131.900
Plus CY Adv Procurement 124.140 86.060 115.580 128.480 131.900 586.160
Weapon System Cost 124.140 549.790 605.530 782.410 733.980 648.160 3,444.000
Multiyear Procurement
Gross Cost (P-1) 573.460 562.150 748.350 708.780 757.630 3,350.370
Less PY Adv Procurement (115.300) (86.560) (113.350) (126.190) (129.540) (570.930)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 458.160 475.600 635.000 582.600 628.100 2,779.440
Advance Procurement
For FY07 113.940 113.940
For FY08 4.300 81.730 86.030
For FY09 2.600 2.890 107.860 113.350
For FY10 1.700 2.890 2.920 118.680 126.190
For FY11 1.600 2.890 2.920 1.560 120.570 129.540
Plus CY Adv Procurement 124.140 90.400 113.700 120.240 120.570 569.050
Weapon System Cost 124.140 548.560 589.300 755.240 703.160 628.100 3,348.490
Multiyear Savings($) 1.230 16.230 27.170 30.820 20.060 95.510
Cancellation Ceiling-Funded
Cancellation Ceiling-Unfunded
Outlays
Annual 27.680 172.260 390.700 580.240 676.850 704.100 530.580 249.850 62.930 32.610 16.200 3,444.000
Multiyear 27.680 171.980 386.590 567.340 654.390 678.760 512.150 241.770 60.730 31.400 15.700 3,348.490
Savings 0.270 4.110 12.900 22.470 25.330 18.430 8.080 2.200 1.210 0.500 95.510
Remarks:
Annual Procurement
Gross Cost 924.720 925.490 1,128.290 1,227.220 1,239.550 5,445.270
Less PY Adv Procurement (116.590) (118.150) (142.420) (171.960) (173.130) (722.260)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 808.130 807.340 985.870 1,055.260 1,066.410 4,723.010
Advance Procurement
For FY07 115.870
For FY08 1.730 116.080
For FY09 2.200 140.220
For FY10 1.100 7.150 163.710
For FY11 1.100 5.500 2.200 164.330
Plus CY Adv Procurement 117.600 120.480 152.870 165.910 164.330 721.200
Weapon System Cost 117.600 928.610 960.220 1,151.780 1,219.590 1,066.410 5,444.210
Multiyear Procurement
Gross Cost (P-1) 911.850 912.740 1,112.440 1,210.690 1,223.290 5,371.010
Less PY Adv Procurement (116.590) (114.550) (133.870) (176.910) (180.330) (722.260)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 795.260 798.190 978.570 1,033.780 1,042.950 4,648.760
Advance Procurement
For FY07 115.870 115.870
For FY08 1.730 112.480 114.210
For FY09 4.000 129.870 133.870
For FY10 2.000 13.000 161.910 176.910
For FY11 2.000 10.000 4.000 164.330 180.330
Plus CY Adv Procurement 117.600 120.480 152.870 165.910 164.330 721.200
Weapon System Cost 117.600 915.740 951.060 1,144.480 1,198.120 1,042.950 5,369.950
Multiyear Savings($) 12.870 9.150 7.300 21.470 23.460 74.250
Cancellation Ceiling-Funded
Cancellation Ceiling-Unfunded
Outlays
Annual 26.220 254.120 619.440 913.310 1050.810 1121.060 870.520 407.690 100.410 53.950 26.660 5,444.210
Multiyear 26.220 251.250 612.250 904.320 1039.930 1104.470 854.120 399.650 98.770 52.900 26.070 5,369.950
Savings 2.870 7.190 8.990 10.890 16.590 16.400 8.050 1.640 1.050 0.590 74.250
Remarks:
Annual AP scenario includes Common Cockpit and Mission Systems MPY EOQ
Quantities as represented in PB07 Budget.
All numbers are in millions, except where noted.
All savings projections are assumed.
Annual Procurement
Gross Cost 1,062.613 1,301.766 1,800.218 1,747.821 1,481.575 7,394.003
Less PY Adv Procurement (132.444) (118.405) (158.014) (165.511) (150.571) (724.955)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 930.179 1,183.361 1,642.204 1,582.320 1,331.004 6,669.048
Plus CY Adv Procurement 132.444 118.405 158.014 165.511 150.571 724.955
Contract Price 132.444 1,048.584 1,341.375 1,807.715 1,732.891 1,331.004 7,394.003
Multiyear Procurement
Gross Cost (P-1) 998.876 1,227.849 1,706.533 1,656.097 1,398.358 6,987.703
Less PY Adv Procurement (123.924) (177.589) (185.492) (196.820) (171.323) (855.148)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 874.952 1,050.260 1,521.041 1,459.277 1,227.035 6,132.565
Advance Procurement
For FY07 123.924 123.924
For FY08 2.630 174.959 177.589
For FY09 2.600 19.799 163.093 185.492
For FY10 1.700 8.841 14.787 171.492 196.820
For FY11 1.600 6.689 10.380 6.382 146.272 171.323
Plus CY Adv Procurement 132.444 210.288 188.260 177.874 146.272 855.138
Contract Price 132.444 1085.240 1238.520 1698.925 1605.539 1227.035 6,987.703
Multiyear Savings($) 0.000 (36.656) 102.855 108.790 127.342 103.969 406.300
Multiyear Savings (%) (total only) 5.49%
Cancellation Ceiling-Funded
Cancellation Ceiling-Unfunded
Outlays
Annual 28.120 271.175 764.023 1,229.381 1,542.633 1,584.570 1,171.791 514.443 164.688 85.337 37.842 7,394.003
Multiyear 28.120 277.400 762.606 1,167.889 1,446.019 1,476.736 1,086.766 476.016 152.623 78.732 34.796 6,987.703
Savings 0.000 (6.235) 1.427 61.472 96.624 107.834 85.025 38.437 12.065 6.605 3.046 406.300
Remarks: See remarks on individual service submissions.
Annual Procurement
Gross Cost 480.753 684.246 1,009.138 927.331 656.135 3,757.603
Less PY Adv Procurement (36.974) (38.505) (57.814) (50.371) (36.161) (219.825)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 443.779 645.741 951.324 876.960 619.974 3,537.778
Plus CY Adv Procurement 36.974 38.505 57.814 50.371 36.161 219.825
Contract Price 36.974 482.284 703.555 1,001.695 913.121 619.974 3,757.603
Multiyear Procurement
Gross Cost (P-1) 443.976 639.119 952.463 873.907 611.598 3,521.063
Less PY Adv Procurement (36.974) (102.979) (96.072) (79.030) (52.073) (367.128)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 407.002 536.140 856.391 794.877 559.525 3,153.935
Advance Procurement
For FY07 36.974 36.974
For FY08 102.979 102.979
For FY09 15.109 80.963 96.072
For FY10 5.051 6.017 67.962 79.030
For FY11 2.899 2.960 3.022 43.192 52.073
Plus CY Adv Procurement 36.974 126.038 89.940 70.984 43.192 367.128
Contract Price 36.974 533.040 626.080 927.375 838.069 559.525 3,521.063
Multiyear Savings($) (50.756) 77.475 74.320 75.052 60.449 236.540
Multiyear Savings (%) (total only) 6.29%
Cancellation Ceiling-Funded
Cancellation Ceiling-Unfunded
Outlays
Annual 6.830 106.705 367.783 627.401 827.843 824.340 589.241 241.563 96.638 49.197 20.062 3,757.603
Multiyear 6.830 116.080 377.656 587.819 764.579 758.426 539.046 219.256 88.413 44.852 18.106 3,521.063
Savings 0.000 (9.375) (9.873) 39.582 63.264 65.914 50.195 22.307 8.225 4.345 1.956 236.540
Remarks:
Annual Procurement
Gross Cost 268.430 306.610 404.390 417.260 428.670 1,825.370
Less PY Adv Procurement (54.980) (32.940) (42.620) (43.080) (44.000) (217.630)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 213.450 273.670 361.770 374.190 384.670 1,607.740
Plus CY Adv Procurement 54.980 32.940 42.620 43.080 44.000 217.630
Contract Price 54.980 246.390 316.290 404.850 418.190 384.670 1,825.370
Multiyear Procurement
Gross Cost (P-1) 254.330 290.570 383.230 395.490 406.250 1,729.860
Less PY Adv Procurement (46.460) (31.250) (40.390) (40.780) (41.640) (200.520)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 207.870 259.320 342.840 354.710 364.610 1,529.350
Advance Procurement
For FY07 46.460 46.460
For FY08 2.630 28.620 31.250
For FY09 2.600 2.890 34.900 40.390
For FY10 1.700 2.890 2.920 33.270 40.780
For FY11 1.600 2.890 2.920 1.560 32.670 41.640
Plus CY Adv Procurement 54.980 37.290 40.740 34.830 32.670 200.510
Contract Price 54.980 245.160 300.060 377.680 387.370 364.610 1,729.860
Multiyear Savings($) 1.230 16.230 27.170 30.820 20.060 95.510
Multiyear Savings (%) (total only) 5.23%
Cancellation Ceiling-Funded
Cancellation Ceiling-Unfunded
Outlays
Annual 12.260 76.940 184.920 290.070 357.840 389.730 304.430 145.160 35.480 18.920 9.620 1,825.370
Multiyear 12.260 76.660 180.810 277.160 335.380 364.400 286.000 137.090 33.280 17.710 9.120 1,729.860
Savings 0.000 0.270 4.110 12.900 22.470 25.330 18.430 8.080 2.200 1.210 0.500 95.510
Remarks:
Annual Procurement
Gross Cost 313.430 310.910 386.690 403.230 396.770 1,811.030
Less PY Adv Procurement (40.490) (46.960) (57.580) (72.060) (70.410) (287.500)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 272.950 263.950 329.110 331.170 326.360 1,523.530
Plus CY Adv Procurement 40.490 46.960 57.580 72.060 70.410 287.500
Contract Price 40.490 319.910 321.530 401.170 401.580 326.360 1,811.030
Multiyear Procurement
Gross Cost (P-1) 300.570 298.160 370.840 386.700 380.510 1,736.780
Less PY Adv Procurement (40.490) (43.360) (49.030) (77.010) (77.610) (287.500)
Net Procurement(=P-1) 260.080 254.800 321.810 309.690 302.900 1,449.280
Advance Procurement
For FY07 40.490 40.490
For FY08 43.360 43.360
For FY09 1.800 47.230 49.030
For FY10 0.900 5.850 70.260 77.010
For FY11 0.900 4.500 1.800 70.410 77.610
Plus CY Adv Procurement 40.490 46.960 57.580 72.060 70.410 287.500
Contract Price 40.490 307.040 312.380 393.870 380.100 302.900 1,736.780
Multiyear Savings($) 12.870 9.150 7.300 21.470 23.460 74.250
Multiyear Savings (%) (total only) 4.10%
Cancellation Ceiling-Funded
Cancellation Ceiling-Unfunded
Outlays
Annual 9.030 87.530 211.320 311.910 356.950 370.500 278.120 127.720 32.570 17.220 8.160 1,811.030
Multiyear 9.030 84.660 204.140 302.910 346.060 353.910 261.720 119.670 30.930 16.170 7.570 1,736.780
Savings 0.000 2.870 7.190 8.990 10.890 16.590 16.400 8.050 1.640 1.050 0.590 74.250
Remarks:
Multiyear Proposal
Then Year Cost 28.120 277.400 762.606 1167.889 1446.019 1476.736 1086.766 476.016 152.623 78.732 34.796 6987.703
Constant Year Cost 28.120 272.071 733.892 1102.121 1336.942 1338.398 967.298 417.128 131.418 66.660 29.028 6423.066
Present Value 28.036 265.009 697.983 1025.923 1218.412 1196.268 847.148 357.830 108.866 53.973 23.095 5822.553
Difference
Then Year Cost 0.000 (6.235) 1.427 61.472 96.624 107.834 85.025 38.437 12.065 6.605 3.046 406.300
Constant Year Cost 0.000 (6.102) 1.368 57.890 89.266 97.717 75.571 33.556 10.365 5.584 2.509 367.734
Present Value 0.000 (5.835) 1.551 53.848 81.328 87.179 65.839 28.532 8.552 4.493 1.982 327.459
Multiyear Proposal
Then Year Cost 6.830 116.080 377.656 587.819 764.579 758.426 539.046 219.256 88.413 44.852 18.106 3,521.063
Constant Year Cost 6.830 113.691 362.292 552.301 703.572 683.568 475.848 189.568 74.868 37.200 14.708 3,214.446
Present Value 6.746 109.519 340.373 506.073 628.782 595.798 404.518 157.190 60.546 29.343 11.315 2,850.203
Difference
Then Year Cost 0.000 (9.375) (9.873) 39.582 63.264 65.914 50.195 22.307 8.225 4.345 1.956 236.540
Constant Year Cost 0.000 (9.182) (9.472) 37.190 58.216 59.407 44.311 19.286 6.965 3.604 1.589 211.914
Present Value 0.000 (8.845) (8.899) 34.078 52.028 51.779 37.669 15.992 5.632 2.843 1.222 183.499
Remarks: Constant Year Dollars are Fiscal Year 2006. Inflation factors and outlay rates reflect January, 2006 OSD projections. Discount rate of 2.53% was applied to
the constant dollar outlays, and assumes uniform outlays throughout the fiscal year (midyear factors).
Multiyear Proposal
Then Year Cost 12.260 76.660 180.810 277.160 335.380 364.400 286.000 137.090 33.280 17.710 9.120 1729.860
Constant Year Cost 12.260 75.510 175.960 265.520 315.360 336.530 261.130 124.510 30.490 16.130 8.210 1621.600
Present Value 12.260 74.720 171.760 256.620 302.650 320.510 245.180 114.540 27.100 14.050 7.050 1546.450
Difference
Then Year Cost 0.000 0.270 4.110 12.900 22.470 25.330 18.430 8.080 2.200 1.210 0.500 95.510
Constant Year Cost 0.000 0.270 3.950 12.260 21.050 23.390 16.830 7.340 2.020 1.110 0.450 88.670
Present Value 0.000 0.270 3.910 11.950 20.270 22.280 15.800 6.750 1.790 0.960 0.390 84.370
Remarks:
Multiyear Proposal
Then Year Cost 9.030 84.660 204.140 302.910 346.060 353.910 261.720 119.670 30.930 16.170 7.570 1736.780
Constant Year Cost 9.030 82.870 195.640 284.300 318.010 318.300 230.320 103.050 26.060 13.330 6.110 1587.020
Present Value 9.030 80.770 185.850 263.230 286.980 279.960 197.450 86.100 21.220 10.580 4.730 1425.900
Difference
Then Year Cost 0.000 2.870 7.190 8.990 10.890 16.590 16.400 8.050 1.640 1.050 0.590 74.250
Constant Year Cost 0.000 2.810 6.890 8.440 10.000 14.920 14.430 6.930 1.380 0.870 0.470 67.150
Present Value 0.000 2.740 6.540 7.820 9.030 13.120 12.370 5.790 1.130 0.690 0.370 59.590
Remarks: