[#59462] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9342][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#clear does not notify waiting threads in Ruby 1.9.3 — "jsc (Justin Collins)" <redmine@...>

9 messages 2014/01/02

[#59466] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9343][Open] [PATCH] SizedQueue#max= wakes up waiters properly — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2014/01/02

[#59498] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9352][Open] [BUG] rb_sys_fail_str(connect(2) for [fe80::1%lo0]:3000) - errno == 0 — "kain (Claudio Poli)" <claudio@...>

10 messages 2014/01/03

[#59516] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9356][Open] TCPSocket.new does not seem to handle INTR — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

48 messages 2014/01/03

[#59538] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — "shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)" <shyouhei@...>

33 messages 2014/01/03
[#59541] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — Eric Wong <normalperson@...> 2014/01/04

Hi, I noticed a trivial typo in array.c, and it fails building struct.c

[#59582] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9362][Assigned] Minimize cache misshit to gain optimal speed — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2014/01/06

Intersting challenge.

[#59583] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9367][Open] REXML::XmlDecl doesn't use user specified quotes — "bearmini (Takashi Oguma)" <bear.mini@...>

12 messages 2014/01/06

[#59642] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9384][Open] Segfault in ruby 2.1.0p0 — "cbliard (Christophe Bliard)" <christophe.bliard@...>

11 messages 2014/01/08

[#59791] About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

A while ago I created a proof-of-concept that I intended to use in my

16 messages 2014/01/15
[#59794] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/15

On 15 Jan 2014, at 11:58, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59808] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/16

Em 15-01-2014 19:42, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59810] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/16

On 16 Jan 2014, at 02:15, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[#59826] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2014/01/17

Em 16-01-2014 19:43, Eric Hodel escreveu:

[#59832] Re: About unmarshallable DRb objects life-time — Eric Hodel <[email protected]> 2014/01/17

On 17 Jan 2014, at 04:22, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <[email protected]> =

[ruby-core:59618] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9372] Date function cweek reports innaccurately for the date December 30, 2013

From: duerst (Martin Dürst) <duerst@...>
Date: 2014-01-07 05:05:06 UTC
List: ruby-core #59618
Issue #9372 has been updated by duerst (Martin D端rst).


tadf (tadayoshi funaba) wrote:
> A period of time of seven days within a calendar year, starting on a
> Monday and identified by its ordinal number within the year; the first
> calendar week of the year is the one that includes the first Thursday
> of that year. In the Gregorian calendar, this is equivalent to the
> week which includes 4 January.

This may not yet be completely clear, because it says "within a [calendar] year" twice. The following quote, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_week_date, is even clearer:

"ISO week-numbering years have a year numbering which is approximately the same as the Gregorian years, but not exactly since an ISO week-numbering year (also called ISO year or week year informally) has 52 or 53 full weeks. That is 364 or 371 days instead of the usual 365 or 366 days."

It may be a good idea to add the following example (borrowed from cwyear) 
Date.new(2000,1,1).cweek         #=> 53, see Date#cwyear
Tadayoshi, I can do that if you are okay.

----------------------------------------
Bug #9372: Date function cweek reports innaccurately for the date December 30, 2013
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9372#change-44148

Author: pblesi (Patrick Blesi)
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee: tadf (tadayoshi funaba)
Category: 
Target version: 
ruby -v: 2.0.0p247
Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN


Date function cweek reports innaccurately for the date December 30, 2013.  The current week is reported as 1 instead of 53.


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread