[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, [email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83196] [Ruby trunk Bug#13992] Strange behaviour for kernel#integer method
From:
ivan.lasorsa@...
Date:
2017-10-10 11:04:51 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83196
Issue #13992 has been updated by Ursus (Ivan Lasorsa).
zverok (Victor Shepelev) wrote:
> Yes, it does. Leading zero designates octal number (base 8), which can't have digit "8" in it.
~~~ ruby
Integer('09', 10)
9
~~~
This works as expected. My fault thinking that 10 should be the default base
----------------------------------------
Bug #13992: Strange behaviour for kernel#integer method
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13992#change-67139
* Author: Ursus (Ivan Lasorsa)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 2.4.1
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I tried this one with ruby 2.3.1 and ruby 2.4.1.
~~~ ruby
Integer('04')
4
Integer('05')
5
Integer('08')
ArgumentError: invalid value for Integer(): "08"
Integer('09')
ArgumentError: invalid value for Integer(): "09"
~~~
Does this makes sense?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>