[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, [email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83516] [Ruby trunk Feature#2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library
From:
knu@...
Date:
2017-10-23 04:26:12 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83516
Issue #2348 has been updated by knu (Akinori MUSHA). Honestly, I have no idea if this library is or can become popular. SortedSet was originally meant to be an example implementation to show what it is like to implement a subclass of Set with an alternative data structure or an additional algorithm, because I designed Set with consideration so that it is easily extensible unlike stock container classes like Hash and Array. Actually I wrote two examples: SortedSet and RestrictedSet, and the latter was kept in the document as I was unsure if it was practically useful. So, it was not my point to promote rbtree as standard library, but just to show Hash is not the only possible backend for Set. ---------------------------------------- Feature #2348: RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/2348#change-67533 * Author: JEG2 (James Gray) * Status: Assigned * Priority: Normal * Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) * Target version: next minor ---------------------------------------- =begin The merits of this library have been discussed on Ruby core, with the strengths best summarized by this post: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/26602 RBTree has now been fixed to run on Ruby 1.9: http://github.com/skade/rbtree I think we should now give serious consideration to bringing it into the standard library. =end -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>