[#83096] File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?}) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
On 2017/10/04 8:47, [email protected] wrote:
5 messages
2017/10/04
[#83100] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/04
Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83105] Re: File.setuid? on IO (Re: [ruby-cvs:67289] normal:r60108 (trunk): file.c: release GVL in File.{setuid?, setgid?, sticky?})
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2017/10/04
On 2017/10/04 15:55, Eric Wong wrote:
[#83107] Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes? — Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
Hello,
9 messages
2017/10/04
[#83113] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/05
This has been requested countless times, then rejected each and every time.
[#83129] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Alberto Almagro <albertoalmagro@...>
2017/10/05
Sorry I didn't found it on the core mail list's archive.
[#83138] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2017/10/06
Ruby has not been made of popular votes so far. You have to show us
[#83149] Re: Alias Enumerable#include? to Enumerable#includes?
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2017/10/06
Alberto Almagro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#83200] [Ruby trunk Feature#13996] [PATCH] file.c: apply2files releases GVL — normalperson@...
Issue #13996 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2017/10/10
[ruby-core:83610] [Ruby trunk Feature#10183] An alternative name for method `class`
From:
tom@...
Date:
2017-10-30 03:56:46 UTC
List:
ruby-core #83610
Issue #10183 has been updated by wardrop (Tom Wardrop).
Came here to make a similar feature suggestion. Ideally `class` would be aliased as something such as `klass` which has become somewhat of a ruby idiom to avoid collision with the `class` keyword. Though I'd also be interested to discuss the possibility of introducing shorter syntax for `self.`, such as some kind of single-character prefix. Some examples:
```ruby
self.class::MYCONST
klass::MYCONST # alias of #class method
$class::MYCONST # special global
~class::MYCONST # tilda prefix shouldn't clash with any existing syntax rules
```
----------------------------------------
Feature #10183: An alternative name for method `class`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10183#change-67632
* Author: sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
The method `class` is special in that it always has to have an explicit receiver in order to avoid crash with the keyword `class`. But this is very inconvenient. I have seen so many
self.class
in codes. I propose that there should be an alternative name for this method so that it can be used with an implicit receiver, and the method name `class` should be gradually depricated.
As for the name, I have no clear idea. I can only think of `klass`, but perhaps someone else might come up with a better name.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>