dev-cpp-users Mailing List for Dev-C++

Yes, of course your solution is the "ultimate" way of writing it.

The important thing about the two ways of using division is to point out
problems with truncation errors where multiple integer divisions are used.

/Per W

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Reuven R. wrote:

> (ticks2/CLOCKS_PER_SEC-ticks1/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
> became
> (((ticks2-ticks1)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
> so why not go a bit further and...
> ((ticks2-ticks1)<CLOCKS_PER_SEC)
> ?;)
>
> =====
> http://www.mia.org.il/petition/index1.html
> http://hungersite.com
>
> in case, ur wondering, about the first link -
> http://www.terror-victims.israel.net/mainh.swf
>
> and who'd thought that we'll need http://www.petitiononline.com/rjw23/ ,eh?
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

Andre Macario Barros wrote:
> My (new) questions/considerations are:
>=20
> A) How to update the windres.exe? Is it the same way I did (Full
>    Dev earliest version new install)?

Go to http://www.mingw.org and get the latest version of "binutils" from =
the=20
downloads page.

> B) Where do I find on Mingw documentation or in Dev documentation
>    any tutorial about editing and compiling resource files?

About editing, there is some info in the Win32 API reference, and general=
ly on=20
the net. About compiling, type "windres --help" in a command prompt, and =
it will=20
print it's usage info, but Dev-Cpp uses windres correctly, so you don't r=
eally=20
need that.

--
Greets,
   Bal=E1zs

(ticks2/CLOCKS_PER_SEC-ticks1/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
became
(((ticks2-ticks1)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
so why not go a bit further and...
((ticks2-ticks1)<CLOCKS_PER_SEC)
?;)

=====
http://www.mia.org.il/petition/index1.html
http://hungersite.com

in case, ur wondering, about the first link -
http://www.terror-victims.israel.net/mainh.swf

and who'd thought that we'll need http://www.petitiononline.com/rjw23/ ,eh?


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Guess what. I normally _always_ test things before sending out answers.
Why do you think I said that one machine stepped with 10ms granularity,
and another with 15.625ms? Anyway, the program always endied after >=
CLOCKS_PER_SEC ticks.

/Per W

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:

> XXXXXXXXX
>
> Sorry
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
> To: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
> Cc: <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 3:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] time - try this,
>
>
> CAN YOUI JOKERS STOP LOOKING AT THE ##### CODE ANF JUSTR TRY THE %$%%%t% THING, i DON'T ASJFOPE MUCG
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
> To: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
> Cc: <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] time - try this,
>
>
> If you do
>
> ((ticks2 - ticks1) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC) < 1
>
> (observe difference before division) there is no possibility that you can
> get an answer less than 1000. If you do two divisions, you might get into
> problems because of the round-off errors you introduce.
>
> While you have to divide the value from clock() with CLOCKS_PER_SEC to get
> seconds, there is no guarantee that the value returned by clock() can
> assume all possible values, i.e. if CLOCKS_PER_TICK is 1000, it is still
> possible that the only values you can get are 32, 64, 96 etc if the actual
> clock only counts in 32ms resolution. In real life, most of the time,
> clock() steps with a non-integer number of ticks because the underlying hw
> might tick on a frequency that is
>
> For Posix compliance, CLOCKS_PER_SEC should _always_ be 1000000 i.e.
> microsecond resolution, even of the real computer clock can't tick once
> every us.
>
> On one of my machines - WinXP, P4 HT - the possible steps are 15.625ms,
> i.e. I get the values 15,31,62,78,... for a total of 64 values/second.
>
> On another machine using Linux, clock() steps exactly exactly every 10ms,
> but since the resolution is in us, the possible values increases with
> 10000 at a time.
>
> /Per W

XXXXXXXXX

Sorry







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
To: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
Cc: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] time - try this,


CAN YOUI JOKERS STOP LOOKING AT THE ##### CODE ANF JUSTR TRY THE %$%%%t% THING, i DON'T ASJFOPE MUCG 




  


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
To: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
Cc: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] time - try this,


If you do

((ticks2 - ticks1) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC) < 1

(observe difference before division) there is no possibility that you can
get an answer less than 1000. If you do two divisions, you might get into
problems because of the round-off errors you introduce.

While you have to divide the value from clock() with CLOCKS_PER_SEC to get
seconds, there is no guarantee that the value returned by clock() can
assume all possible values, i.e. if CLOCKS_PER_TICK is 1000, it is still
possible that the only values you can get are 32, 64, 96 etc if the actual
clock only counts in 32ms resolution. In real life, most of the time,
clock() steps with a non-integer number of ticks because the underlying hw
might tick on a frequency that is

For Posix compliance, CLOCKS_PER_SEC should _always_ be 1000000 i.e.
microsecond resolution, even of the real computer clock can't tick once
every us.

On one of my machines - WinXP, P4 HT - the possible steps are 15.625ms,
i.e. I get the values 15,31,62,78,... for a total of 64 values/second.

On another machine using Linux, clock() steps exactly exactly every 10ms,
but since the resolution is in us, the possible values increases with
10000 at a time.

/Per W

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:

> Hi Malcolm
> I just tried it again and got 990 then 1040
>
> I wonder why? I have a Pentium 4, 2GHz, "GenuineIntel" (according to the control panel.) windows 98se
>
> >From Eric
>
>
>
> We are all here on earth to help others;
> what on earth the others are here for I don't know!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Malcolm Nealon"
> To: <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] time - try this,
>
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> On 29 December 2004, 11:11:18, you wrote:
>
> > #include<time.h>
> > #include<stdio.h>
>
> > int main(void)
> > {
> >   clock_t ticks1, ticks2;
>
> >   ticks1=clock();
> >   ticks2=ticks1;
> >   while((ticks2/CLOCKS_PER_SEC-ticks1/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
> >     ticks2=clock();
>
> >   printf("Took %ld ticks to wait one second.\n",ticks2-ticks1);
> >   printf("This value should be the same as CLOCKS_PER_SEC which is %ld.\n",CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
> >   return 0;
> > }
>
> This produces 1000
>
>
>    while(((ticks2-ticks1)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
>      ticks2=clock();
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Malcolm
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

CAN YOUI JOKERS STOP LOOKING AT THE ##### CODE ANF JUSTR TRY THE %$%%%t% THING, i DON'T ASJFOPE MUCG 




  


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Per Westermark" <pw...@ia...>
To: "Eric" <eri...@cl...>
Cc: <dev...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] time - try this,


If you do

((ticks2 - ticks1) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC) < 1

(observe difference before division) there is no possibility that you can
get an answer less than 1000. If you do two divisions, you might get into
problems because of the round-off errors you introduce.

While you have to divide the value from clock() with CLOCKS_PER_SEC to get
seconds, there is no guarantee that the value returned by clock() can
assume all possible values, i.e. if CLOCKS_PER_TICK is 1000, it is still
possible that the only values you can get are 32, 64, 96 etc if the actual
clock only counts in 32ms resolution. In real life, most of the time,
clock() steps with a non-integer number of ticks because the underlying hw
might tick on a frequency that is

For Posix compliance, CLOCKS_PER_SEC should _always_ be 1000000 i.e.
microsecond resolution, even of the real computer clock can't tick once
every us.

On one of my machines - WinXP, P4 HT - the possible steps are 15.625ms,
i.e. I get the values 15,31,62,78,... for a total of 64 values/second.

On another machine using Linux, clock() steps exactly exactly every 10ms,
but since the resolution is in us, the possible values increases with
10000 at a time.

/Per W

On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Eric wrote:

> Hi Malcolm
> I just tried it again and got 990 then 1040
>
> I wonder why? I have a Pentium 4, 2GHz, "GenuineIntel" (according to the control panel.) windows 98se
>
> >From Eric
>
>
>
> We are all here on earth to help others;
> what on earth the others are here for I don't know!
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Malcolm Nealon"
> To: <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 12:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] time - try this,
>
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> On 29 December 2004, 11:11:18, you wrote:
>
> > #include<time.h>
> > #include<stdio.h>
>
> > int main(void)
> > {
> >   clock_t ticks1, ticks2;
>
> >   ticks1=clock();
> >   ticks2=ticks1;
> >   while((ticks2/CLOCKS_PER_SEC-ticks1/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
> >     ticks2=clock();
>
> >   printf("Took %ld ticks to wait one second.\n",ticks2-ticks1);
> >   printf("This value should be the same as CLOCKS_PER_SEC which is %ld.\n",CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
> >   return 0;
> > }
>
> This produces 1000
>
>
>    while(((ticks2-ticks1)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC)<1)
>      ticks2=clock();
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Malcolm
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users

Hi Andre,

I had the same problem few times ago; the problem was on the PATH. Be sur=
e
that you don't have an old version of WINDRES (cygwin perhaps?) and that
the  actual program that is executed is the one provided by DEVCPP.

Hope that this will help you.

Kind regards,

>
> Dear Users,
>
>    A few days ago I=B4ve post a message about a parse error in a
> resource file during the attempt to compile a windows C program.
>
>    I received 3 recommendations:
>       1-to update my WINDRES;
>       2-to begin with a "empty" project (not windows
>         project);
>       3-to include a #include <windows.h> inside the
>         resource file;
>
>    Thanks for all of you.
>
> My actions were:
> 1-I had Dev 4.9.8.0 / gcc 3.2. I uninstalled it and installed
>   Dev 4.9.9.1 / gcc 3.3 (thinking that the WINDES.EXE would be
>   updated automatically with the new mingw 3.3 package)
>
>   The version of WINDRES.EXE was the same,  2.13.90, and the parse
>   error message continued to be presented;
>
> 2-I made a test with an empty project and the parse error continued
>   to be presented;
>
> and...
>
> 3-I put a #include <windows.h> inside the resource file, the parse
>   error was solved for that example I showed to you, the poppad2.c,
>   but for the next example, the problem appeared again!
>
> My (new) questions/considerations are:
>
> A) How to update the windres.exe? Is it the same way I did (Full
>    Dev earliest version new install)?
> B) Where do I find on Mingw documentation or in Dev documentation
>    any tutorial about editing and compiling resource files?
> C) Any other help?
>
> Regards
> Andre Barros
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>

Dear Users,

   A few days ago I=B4ve post a message about a parse error in a=20
resource file during the attempt to compile a windows C program.

   I received 3 recommendations:
      1-to update my WINDRES;
      2-to begin with a "empty" project (not windows
        project);
      3-to include a #include <windows.h> inside the=20
        resource file;

   Thanks for all of you.

My actions were:
1-I had Dev 4.9.8.0 / gcc 3.2. I uninstalled it and installed
  Dev 4.9.9.1 / gcc 3.3 (thinking that the WINDES.EXE would be=20
  updated automatically with the new mingw 3.3 package)

  The version of WINDRES.EXE was the same,  2.13.90, and the parse
  error message continued to be presented;

2-I made a test with an empty project and the parse error continued
  to be presented;

and...

3-I put a #include <windows.h> inside the resource file, the parse
  error was solved for that example I showed to you, the poppad2.c,
  but for the next example, the problem appeared again!

My (new) questions/considerations are:

A) How to update the windres.exe? Is it the same way I did (Full
   Dev earliest version new install)?
B) Where do I find on Mingw documentation or in Dev documentation
   any tutorial about editing and compiling resource files?
C) Any other help?=20

Regards
Andre Barros

I've seen an issue where if you place an escaped quote in the form:
a_string = (string)"\"";  
then the class browser doesn't see any items below the escaped quote.  This does not happen if you place the same form in the header file!  Go figure.

Tom Strickland <str...@ne...> wrote:
Have you tried changing your class view mode? (right click in the class browser and select View mode from the menu)
Tom

"Daniel Datcu" wrote:

>Hello
>Does anybody know why the class browser in Dev-C++ doesn't show all the classes ?
>Thanks alot
>




Alfred P. Reaud